Next Article in Journal
Distributed Multistatic Sky-Wave Over-The-Horizon Radar Based on the Doppler Frequency for Marine Target Positioning
Next Article in Special Issue
Straightforward Heterogeneous Computing with the oneAPI Coexecutor Runtime
Previous Article in Journal
Control and Validation of a Reinforced Power Conversion System for Upcoming Bioelectrochemical Power to Gas Stations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of OpenMP Master–Slave Implementations for Selected Irregular Parallel Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Electronics
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/electronics10121471
Review Report
electronics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Performance Evaluations of Distributed File Systems for Scientific Big Data in FUSE Environment

Electronics 2021, 10(12), 1471; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121471
by Jun-Yeong Lee 1, Moon-Hyun Kim 1, Syed Asif Raza Shah 2, Sang-Un Ahn 3, Heejun Yoon 3 and Seo-Young Noh 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2021, 10(12), 1471; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121471
Submission received: 14 May 2021 / Revised: 7 June 2021 / Accepted: 15 June 2021 / Published: 18 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Performance Computer Architectures and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript titled "Performance evaluations of distributed file systems for scientific big data on FUSE environment" investigates and benchmark various distributed file systems such as Ceph, GlusterFS, Lustre, and EOS for the data-intensive environment. The distributed file systems under RAIN structure and FUSE as an accessing environment are configured in this study. The manuscript is well-written however the grammatical revision of the manuscript is necessary. The comments below are suggested by the reviewer for improvement of the manuscript:

  1. The main contribution of the research needs to be represented in the "related work" section. The authors should explain the main reason for using this method by referring to the advantages and disadvantages of previous studies.
  2. The "Background" section should be written before the "related work" section. Or the authors can move this section to the end and call it "Appendix" as the section includes the definition of some technical phrases. 
  3. Please change the title of section 4 to "The experimental setup". 
  4. In figure 17, the EOS results for 128K indicate almost the same values for 1 to 4 threads. How do the authors explain it? Can only 1 thread be used instead of 4 as the achieved results are equal?
  5. In the "conclusion" section, the reviewer's suggestion is to add a sentence about the best "Distributed Layout" based on the achieved results?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper surveys various distributed file systems such as Ceph, GlusterFS, Lustre and EOS for data-intensive 12 environments. This discussed topic is hot and important. The structure of this paper is well-organized, which is easy to follow. Overall, this paper is a good-quality paper, which will raise wide interests. Congrats! Only one minor issue is that the format of the manuscript and reference should be unified and follow the journal template.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop