Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Ecological Footprint at the Micro-Scale—How It Can Save Costs: The Case of ENPRO
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Saving Estimation of Athens Trolleybuses Considering Regenerative Braking and Improved Control Scheme
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Ecological Footprint of Ecotourism Packages: A Methodological Proposition
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Implications of Land-Grabbing on the Ecological Balance of Brazil

Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College, D02 PN40 Dublin 2, Ireland
Ecodynamics Group, Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80210, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2018, 7(3), 44;
Received: 25 May 2018 / Revised: 19 July 2018 / Accepted: 27 July 2018 / Published: 31 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological Footprint Assessment for Resources Management)
In the global free-market, natural resource scarcity and opportunities for preserving the local environment are fostering international purchasing of large extensions of land, mainly for agricultural use. These land transactions often involve land cover change (i.e., through deforestation) or a shift from extensive or traditional to intensive agricultural practices. In Brazil, the land appropriation by foreign investors (i.e., the so-called “land-grabbing”) is affecting natural capital availability for local communities to a different extent in the very different territorial entities. At the same time, Brazilian investors are purchasing land in other countries. Ecological footprint accounting is one appropriate lens that can be employed to visualize the aggregated effect of natural capital appropriation and use. The aim of this paper is to provide a first estimate on the effect of land-grabbing on the ecological balance of Brazil through calculating the biocapacity embodied in purchased lands in the different states of Brazil. The results show that Brazil is losing between 9 to 9.3 million global hectares (on a gross basis, or a net total of 7.7 to 8.6 million of global hectares) of its biocapacity due to land-grabbing, when considering respectively a “cropland to cropland” (i.e., no land-cover change) and a “total deforestation” scenario. This represents a minimum estimate, highlighting the need for further land-grabbing data collection at the subnational scale. This analysis can be replicated for other countries of the world, adjusting their ecological balance by considering the biocapacity embodied in international transactions of land. View Full-Text
Keywords: land-grabbing; Brazil; biocapacity; ecological footprint; decoupling; natural capital; sustainability land-grabbing; Brazil; biocapacity; ecological footprint; decoupling; natural capital; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Coscieme, L.; Niccolucci, V.; Giannetti, B.F.; Pulselli, F.M.; Marchettini, N.; Sutton, P.C. Implications of Land-Grabbing on the Ecological Balance of Brazil. Resources 2018, 7, 44.

AMA Style

Coscieme L, Niccolucci V, Giannetti BF, Pulselli FM, Marchettini N, Sutton PC. Implications of Land-Grabbing on the Ecological Balance of Brazil. Resources. 2018; 7(3):44.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coscieme, Luca; Niccolucci, Valentina; Giannetti, Biagio F.; Pulselli, Federico M.; Marchettini, Nadia; Sutton, Paul C. 2018. "Implications of Land-Grabbing on the Ecological Balance of Brazil" Resources 7, no. 3: 44.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop