Next Article in Journal
Groundwater Storage Change Estimation Using Combination of Hydrogeophysical and Groundwater Table Fluctuation Methods in Hard Rock Aquifers
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the Application of Ultrasound in Bioleaching and Insights from Sonication in (Bio)Chemical Processes
Article Menu
Issue 1 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Resources 2018, 7(1), 4;

A Model-Based Framework to Evaluate Alternative Wildfire Suppression Strategies

Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Lab, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula, MT 59801, USA
Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
Pyrologix, Limited Liability Company (LLC), Missoula, MT 59802, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 August 2017 / Revised: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 20 December 2017 / Published: 3 January 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [2264 KB, uploaded 3 January 2018]   |  


The complexity and demands of wildland firefighting in the western U.S. have increased over recent decades due to factors including the expansion of the wildland-urban interface, lengthening fire seasons associated with climate change, and changes in vegetation due to past fire suppression and timber harvest. In light of these changes, the use of more wildland fire on the landscape could reduce fuels and form barriers to the spread of future fires while performing forest restoration in some areas. However, the risks, costs and benefits of changing fire response strategy have not been quantified. Here, we identify gaps regarding the ability to simulate alternative wildfire suppression strategies, due to a number of factors including limited data collected on fireline construction, as well as synergies between firefighting resources and resource effectiveness. We present a fire management continuum: at one end lies full suppression of all fires under all circumstances, and at the opposite end lies no suppression of any fires regardless of location or time in season, with a wide array of managed fire options falling in between. Next, we demonstrate the proof-of-concept using a stochastic fire simulation model, FSim, to simulate two alternative fire suppression strategies close to opposite ends of this continuum for the Sierra National Forest of California: (1) business-as-usual, which equates to nearly full fire suppression; and (2) full suppression of human-caused fires and no suppression actions on lightning-caused fires. Results indicate that fire management strategy can substantially affect the number of large fires and landscape burn probabilities, both of which were shown to increase under the second scenario. However, temporal feedbacks are expected to play an important role: we show that increases in burned area substantially limit ignition potential and the extent of subsequent fires within the first five to ten years, especially under the second scenario. While subject to current data gaps and limitations in fire modeling, the methodology presented here can be used to simulate a number of alternative fire suppression strategies, including decisions to suppress or not suppress fires based on location, time of season or other factors. This method also provides basic inputs needed to estimate risks, costs and benefits of various alternative suppression strategies in future work. In future work, uncertainties resulting from current limitations in knowledge can be addressed using techniques such as scenario planning in order to provide land managers with a set of possible fire outcomes. View Full-Text
Keywords: fire reintroduction; lightning fire; human-caused fire; fire feedbacks; forest restoration; uncertainty; risk; socioecological systems; wildfire suppression; FSim fire reintroduction; lightning fire; human-caused fire; fire feedbacks; forest restoration; uncertainty; risk; socioecological systems; wildfire suppression; FSim

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Riley, K.L.; Thompson, M.P.; Scott, J.H.; Gilbertson-Day, J.W. A Model-Based Framework to Evaluate Alternative Wildfire Suppression Strategies. Resources 2018, 7, 4.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Resources EISSN 2079-9276 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top