Next Article in Journal
Feasibility of Biomass Briquette Production from Municipal Waste Streams by Integrating the Informal Sector in the Philippines
Previous Article in Journal
Access and Benefit Sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Protocol: What Can Some Numbers Tell Us about the Effectiveness of the Regulatory Regime?

Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy

Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe 76133, Germany
Institute for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Economics group, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau 76829, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Lindsay C. Stringer
Resources 2017, 6(1), 10;
Received: 23 December 2016 / Revised: 3 February 2017 / Accepted: 13 February 2017 / Published: 21 February 2017
In view of the increasing depletion of fossil fuel resources, the concept “bioeconomy” aims at the gradual replacement of fossil fuels by renewable feedstock. Seen as a comprehensive societal transition, the bioeconomy is a complex field that includes a variety of sectors, actors, and interests and is related to far-reaching changes in today’s production systems. While the objectives pursued—such as reducing dependence on fossil fuels, mitigating climate change, ensuring global food security, and increasing the industrial use of biogenic resources—are not generally contentious, there is fierce controversy over the possible pathways for achieving these objectives. Based on a thorough literature review, the article identifies major lines of conflict in the current discourse. Criticism of the prevalent concept refers mainly to the strong focus on technology, the lack of consideration given to alternative implementation pathways, the insufficient differentiation of underlying sustainability requirements, and the inadequate participation of societal stakeholders. Since today it cannot be predicted which pathway will be the most expedient—the one already being taken or one of the others proposed—this paper suggests pursuing a strategy of diversity concerning the approaches to shape the bioeconomy, the funding of research topics, and the involvement of stakeholders. View Full-Text
Keywords: bioeconomy; implementation pathways; lines of conflict; sustainability criteria bioeconomy; implementation pathways; lines of conflict; sustainability criteria
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Priefer, C.; Jörissen, J.; Frör, O. Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy. Resources 2017, 6, 10.

AMA Style

Priefer C, Jörissen J, Frör O. Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy. Resources. 2017; 6(1):10.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Priefer, Carmen, Juliane Jörissen, and Oliver Frör. 2017. "Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy" Resources 6, no. 1: 10.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop