Next Article in Journal
Clermont Preferred Future: Stakeholder Reflections on a Community Foresight and Planning Initiative
Next Article in Special Issue
A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Studies to Assess the Property Value Effects of Low Impact Development
Previous Article in Journal
Resource Use of Wind Farms in the German North Sea—The Example of Alpha Ventus and Bard Offshore I
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ecosystem Effects from Nutrient and Pesticide Pollutants: Catchment Care as a Solution

Benefit Transfer: A Review of Methodologies and Challenges

Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Woodin Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2013, 2(4), 517-527;
Received: 2 August 2013 / Revised: 12 September 2013 / Accepted: 11 October 2013 / Published: 21 October 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecosystem Service Valuation, Its Measurement and Uses)
For policy makers, regulators and natural resource managers, the resources necessary for original empirical resource valuations are often unavailable. A common alternative to original valuation studies is the practice of benefit transfer—the use of an empirical value estimate or estimates from a previous study or studies for application in a similar context. In order to reduce the error inherent in applying values from one parcel of land to another, researchers commonly use meta-analysis, or the “study of studies”, to provide a more thorough and statistically valid value estimate for use in a benefit transfer. In the practice of benefit transfer, much emphasis has been placed on improving the validity of values for transfer, but fewer studies have focused on the appropriate application of the established estimates. In this article, several often disregarded concerns that should be addressed when practicing benefit transfer are identified. A special focus is placed on spatial considerations and the recent progress that has been made to incorporate spatial trends. Geographic information systems (GIS) are advocated as a useful tool for incorporating the spatial aspects of benefit transfer. Consensuses and trends in the literature are acknowledged, and areas of potential improvement are highlighted. View Full-Text
Keywords: non-market valuation; benefit transfer; ecosystem services; meta-analysis non-market valuation; benefit transfer; ecosystem services; meta-analysis
MDPI and ACS Style

Boutwell, J.L.; Westra, J.V. Benefit Transfer: A Review of Methodologies and Challenges. Resources 2013, 2, 517-527.

AMA Style

Boutwell JL, Westra JV. Benefit Transfer: A Review of Methodologies and Challenges. Resources. 2013; 2(4):517-527.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boutwell, James L., and John V. Westra 2013. "Benefit Transfer: A Review of Methodologies and Challenges" Resources 2, no. 4: 517-527.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop