Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Projects’ Prospects in the Economic and Technological Development of the Oil and Gas Complex in the Republic of Mozambique
Previous Article in Journal
Predictability and Impact of Structural Reinforcement on Unplanned Dilution in Sublevel Stoping Operations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research Progress of Mine Ecological Restoration Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Importance, Strategies, and Future Prospects of Mine Ecological Restoration

College of Ecology and Environment, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
Resources 2025, 14(7), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14070105 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 June 2025 / Revised: 18 June 2025 / Accepted: 25 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mine Ecological Restoration)

1. Introduction

For a long time, mining has been a critical industry, providing essential resources for development and progress [1]. However, the environmental consequences of mining are profoundly devastating [2,3], including the destruction of habitats [4], soil degradation [5], water pollution [6], and loss of biodiversity [7]. As countries around the world increasingly recognize the urgency of coping with climate change and biodiversity loss, mine ecological restoration has gained importance [8]. This editorial aims to discuss the importance of mine ecological restoration, outline successful restoration strategies, and highlight challenges and future directions in this vital field.

2. The Need for Mine Ecological Restoration

2.1. Environmental Impacts of Mining

Mining operations can cause significant environmental degradation [9,10]. Vegetation clearance, soil disturbance, and landscape alterations induce soil erosion [11], aquatic sedimentation [12], and habitat loss. Additionally, mining-derived contaminants (e.g., heavy metals [13] or acid mine drainage [14]) leach into surrounding ecosystems, resulting in invasive contamination [15,16,17,18].

2.2. Biodiversity Loss

The biodiversity crisis represents a critical global challenge. Mining activities pose a threat to ecosystems and species [19], and many plants and animals fail to adapt to mining-induced disturbances [20], leading to population declines and extinction [21]. The loss of biodiversity not only impacts the environment but also undermines the resilience of ecosystems and their ability to provide essential services [22].

2.3. Climate Change Considerations

As the global research community grapples with climate change, the role of mining in greenhouse gas emissions must be addressed [23]. Ecological restoration can play a critical role in carbon sequestration, helping to mitigate climate impacts while promoting healthy ecosystems. The recovery of degraded land enhances carbon stocks [24], directly supporting carbon mitigation goals.

3. Principles of Ecological Restoration

3.1. Definition and Objectives

Ecological restoration is formally defined as facilitating the recovery of degraded, damaged, or destroyed ecosystems. Its core objectives are to reconstitute structural integrity, functional processes, and biodiversity, thereby enhancing ecosystem resilience and sustainability [25].

3.2. Community Engagement

Ecologically effective restoration requires community participation [26]. Engaging stakeholders, including indigenous communities, local residents, and organizations, is essential for understanding local ecosystems and ensuring that restoration is culturally and ecologically appropriate. Community engagement fosters a sense of ownership and stewardship, which is crucial for the long-term success of restoration projects.

3.3. Scientific Research and Monitoring

Restoration must be grounded in scientific research [27,28,29,30]. Understanding the ecological dynamics of the affected area is critical for designing effective restoration strategies [31]. Monitoring [32] and evaluation [33] are also vital to assess the success of restoration, allowing for adaptive management and continuous improvement.

4. Successful Restoration Strategies

4.1. Reforestation and Afforestation

Reforestation involves replanting trees in deforested areas, while afforestation entails establishing forests in previously non-forested areas. Both practices facilitate habitat restoration, soil quality improvement, and carbon sequestration [34]. Successful examples include the restoration of mined land via native tree planting [35,36], which has led to improved biodiversity and ecosystem services.

4.2. Soil Restoration Techniques

Restoring soil health is fundamental to ecological restoration. Techniques such as soil amendment with organic matter [37], erosion control measures [38], and the introduction of mycorrhizal fungi [39] can enhance soil fertility and promote plant growth [40]. Biomass undergoes thermochemical conversion under limited or anaerobic conditions, generating a carbon-rich solid substance called biochar [41,42,43]. Biochar and its modified materials are recognized as significant soil amendments. These approaches have revitalized degraded soils in post-mining landscapes.

4.3. Wetland Restoration

Wetlands also play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity and hydrological cycles [44]. Mining activities frequently degrade these ecosystems, yet targeted restoration initiatives can rehabilitate their ecological functions. Creating artificial wetlands or restoring natural wetlands can improve water filtration, provide habitats for wildlife [45], and enhance local hydrology.

4.4. Native Species Reintroduction

Reintroducing native species is vital for rebuilding ecosystem resilience. In the mining industry, this may involve re-establishing native flora and fauna that have been displaced. Successful reintroduction programs require careful planning [46], including habitat assessment and monitoring to ensure species viability.

5. Challenges in Mine Ecological Restoration

5.1. Financial Constraints

One significant challenge in mine ecological restoration is the lack of funding [47,48]. Restoration projects often require substantial investment, yet many mining companies may prioritize short-term profits over long-term ecological health. Governments and regulatory bodies must provide financial support to ensure that companies allocate resources for restoration.

5.2. Regulatory Frameworks

The regulatory framework surrounding mining and restoration can be complex and inconsistent. Effective policies and regulations are necessary to ensure that mining companies are held accountable for their environmental impacts [49]. Clear guidelines and incentives for restoration practices can help drive progress in this area.

5.3. Climate Change Adaptation

As climate change continues to alter ecosystems, future climate scenarios must be considered for effective restoration [50]. Selecting appropriate species [51], designing resilient landscapes, and integrating adaptive management practices are crucial to ensure the long-term success of restoration projects [52].

5.4. Knowledge Gaps

Despite advances in restoration science [53,54], significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the most effective strategies for different ecosystems and mining contexts [55]. Continued research and collaboration between scientists, practitioners, and policymakers are essential to develop evidence-based restoration practices [56].

6. Future Prospects

6.1. Integrated Approaches

The future of mine ecological restoration lies in multidimensional frameworks integrating ecological, socioeconomic, and governance dimensions [57]. Collaborative efforts between mining companies, governments, and local communities enable the development of holistic restoration strategies with environmental and societal co-benefits.

6.2. Technological Innovations

Emerging technologies, such as remote sensing [58,59] and ecological modeling [60], can enhance restoration efforts. These tools enable more accurate assessments of ecosystem conditions and facilitate adaptive management. Additionally, biotechnological advancements may aid in soil remediation and species reintroduction [61].

6.3. Education and Capacity Building

Investing in education and capacity building is critical for the success of restoration initiatives [62]. Training local communities and stakeholders in restoration techniques and ecological principles fosters resilience and empowers individuals to take part in the restoration process.

7. Conclusions

Mine ecological restoration is an important requirement for sustainable development. While mining plays an essential role in society, its environmental impacts cannot be overlooked. Through effective restoration practices, we can rehabilitate damaged ecosystems [63,64], support biodiversity [65], and contribute to climate change mitigation. Progressive pathways necessitate transdisciplinary collaboration, technological innovation, and institutional commitment to ensuring the integrity of ecosystems. Prioritizing regenerative mining transitions will lead to both the restoration of land and a sustainable and resilient future.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2023JJ31010, 2024JJ7094, 2025JJ70604) and the Key Project of Scientific Research Project of the Hunan Provincial Department of Education (23A0225). This research was also funded by the Hunan Province Environmental Protection Research Project (HBKYXM-2023038) and the Scientific Research Foundation for Talented Scholars of CSUFT (2020YJ010).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the participants who devoted their free time to participating in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xiang, Y.; Gong, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Chen, J.; Liang, H.; Chen, Y.; Fu, X.; Su, R.; Luo, Y. Research Progress of Mine Ecological Restoration Technology. Resources 2025, 14, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, M.S. Ecological restoration of mineland with particular reference to the metalliferous mine wasteland in China: A review of research and practice. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 357, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stephanie, W.A.; Li, J. Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of mining for post-mined land restoration and land-use: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 279, 111623. [Google Scholar]
  4. Osterhout, M.J.; Stewart, K.M.; Wakeling, B.F.; Schroeder, C.A.; Blum, M.E.; Brockman, J.C.; Shoemaker, K.T. Effects of large-scale gold mining on habitat use and selection by American pronghorn. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 921, 170750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Su, R.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Chen, R.; Wang, J. Application for ecological restoration of contaminated soil: Phytoremediation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 13124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, L.; Tang, L.; Zhang, X.; Hou, Z.; Haris, M.; Luo, J.; Yang, Y. Mine waste water self-purification (arsenic) in neutral hydrogeochemical ecosystem: A case study from V-Ti-Fe mine tailings. Geochemistry 2023, 83, 125947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Puche, A.G.; Driver, E.M.; Propper, C.R. Review: Abandoned mines as a resource or liability for wildlife. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 921, 171017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Su, R.; Ou, Q.; Wang, H.; Dai, X.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Y.; Yao, H.; Ouyang, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z. Organic–inorganic composite modifiers enhance restoration potential of Nerium oleander L. to lead–zinc tailing: Application of phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 56569–56579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, M.; Wang, Q. Rock dynamics in deep mining. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2023, 33, 1065–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Michał, H.; Bogumił, N.; Paweł, S. Evaluating indicators of hydrologic alteration to demonstrate the impact of open-pit lignite mining on the flow regimes of small and medium-sized rivers. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 157, 111295. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao, R.; Ai, N.; Liu, G.; Liu, C.; Qiang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, T.; Zang, K. The Coupling Relationship between Herb Communities and Soil in a Coal Mine Reclamation Area after Different Years of Restoration. Forests 2022, 13, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, X.; Ning, Z.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, P. A novel calculation method of subsidence waterlogging spatial information based on remote sensing techniques and surface subsidence prediction. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 335, 130366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hou, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, J.; Wei, Q.; Zang, L.; Zhao, X. Environmental contamination and health risk assessment of potentially toxic trace metal elements in soils near gold mines—A global meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 330, 121803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, K.; Zhu, M.; Wen, J. The impact of microbial community structure changes on the migration and release of typical heavy metal (loid)s during the revegetation process of mercury-thallium mining waste slag. Environ. Res. 2024, 251, 118716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Passarelli, I.; Mora-Silva, D.; Arguello Guadalupe, C.; Carrillo Arteaga, T.; Ureta Valdez, R.; Orna Puente, L.M.; Tobar Ruiz, M.G.; Ati-Cutiupala, G.; Sanchez-Salazar, M.; Straface, S.; et al. Risks to Human Health from the Consumption of Water from Aquifers in Gold Mining Areas in the Coastal Region of Ecuador. Resources 2024, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Passarelli, I.; Mora-Silva, D.; Jimenez-Gutierrez, M.; Logroño-Naranjo, S.; Hernández-Allauca, D.; Valdez, R.U.; Avalos Peñafiel, V.G.; Tierra Pérez, L.P.; Sanchez-Salazar, M.; Tobar Ruiz, M.G.; et al. Hg pollution in groundwater of andean region of ecuador and human health risk assessment. Resources 2024, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alghamdi, S.A.; El-Zohri, M. Phytoremediation characterization of heavy metals by some native plants at anthropogenic polluted sites in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Resources 2024, 13, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gomes, P.C.S.; Rochinha, I.d.S.P.; Paiva, M.H.R.d.; Santiago, A.d.F. Performance of different macrophytes and support media in constructed wetlands for high turbidity reduction from mine spoil rainwater. Resources 2024, 13, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aska, B.; Franks, D.M.; Stringer, M.; Sonter, L.J. Biodiversity conservation threatened by global mining wastes. Nat. Sustain. 2024, 7, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Clarke, V.C.; Silva, J.M.; Claassens, S.; Siebert, S.J. Crinum bulbispermum, a Medicinal Geophyte with Phytostabilization Properties in Metal-Enriched Mine Tailings. Plants 2023, 13, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Su, R.; Xie, T.; Yao, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Dai, X.; Wang, Y.; Shi, L.; Luo, Y. Lead responses and tolerance mechanisms of Koelreuteria paniculata: A newly potential plant for sustainable phytoremediation of Pb-contaminated soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kattel, G.R. Climate warming in the Himalayas threatens biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services in the 21st century: Is there a better solution? Biodivers. Conserv. 2022, 31, 2017–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rim, K.; David, R.; Laurence, G.; Nicolas, B. Stability of carbon pools and fluxes of a Technosol along a 7-year reclamation chronosequence at an asbestos mine in Canada. Ecol. Eng. 2023, 186, 106839. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, G.; Su, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. Tree-level landscape transitions and changes in carbon storage throughout the mine life cycle. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 166896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Y.; Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Wang, F.; Dong, Y.; Wu, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Tran, L.S.P.; Li, W. Multi-objective ecological restoration priority in China: Cost-benefit optimization in different ecological performance regimes based on planetary boundaries. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 356, 120701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lei, K.; Pan, H.; Lin, C. A landscape approach towards ecological restoration and sustainable development of mining areas. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, R.; Ou, Q.; Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; Dai, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, L. Comparison of phytoremediation potential of Nerium indicum with inorganic modifier calcium carbonate and organic modifier mushroom residue to lead-zinc tailings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, T.; Chen, Y.; Su, R.; Liu, H.; Yao, H. Mechanism of lead-zinc enrichment and resistance of spent mushroom compost to Lead-Zinc slag in Koelreuteria paniculata. Environ. Sci. 2022, 43, 4687–4696. [Google Scholar]
  29. He, L.; Su, R.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, P.; Du, L.; Cai, B.; Zhang, A.; Zhu, H. Integration of manganese accumulation, subcellular distribution, chemical forms, and physiological responses to understand manganese tolerance in Macleaya cordata. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2022, 29, 39017–39026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Wu, Y.; Su, R.; Du, L.; Liu, Z. Mushroom residue modification enhances phytoremediation potential of Paulownia fortunei to lead-zinc slag. Chemosphere 2020, 253, 126774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, Q.; Wang, J.; Jing, Z. Tempo-spatial changes of ecological vulnerability in resource-based urban based on genetic projection pursuit model. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guan, Y.; Zhou, W.; Bai, Z.; Cao, Y.; Wang, J. Delimitation of supervision zones based on the soil property characteristics in a reclaimed opencast coal mine dump on the Loess Plateau, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 772, 145006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Shang, K. Evaluation of mine ecological environment based on fuzzy hierarchical analysis and grey relational degree. Environ. Res. 2024, 257, 119370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Baez, S.E.L.; Boeni, A.F.; Valderrama, P.D.; Rodrigues, R.R. Attention needed in forest carbon projects: An analysis of initiatives in Colombia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 574, 122354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, T.; Wu, M.; Duan, C.; Li, S.; Liu, C. The effect of different restoration approaches on vegetation development in metal mines. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yuan, C.; Wu, F.; Wu, Q.; Fornara, D.A.; Petr, H.; Peng, Y.; Zhu, G.; Zhao, Z.; Yue, K. Vegetation restoration effects on soil carbon and nutrient concentrations and enzymatic activities in post-mining lands are mediated by mine type, climate, and former soil properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 879, 163059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Du, T.; Wang, D.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, Z. Optimizing the formulation of coal gangue planting substrate using wastes: The sustainability of coal mine ecological restoration. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 143, 105669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wong, M.H. Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2003, 50, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, B.D.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Duan, J.; Xiao, X.Y.; Smith, S.E. Effects of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on growth and metal uptake by four plant species in copper mine tailings. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 147, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiao, D.; Peng, S.; He, H.; Xu, X.; Keita, M.; Gigena, M.L.; Zhang, Y. Mechanisms of microbial diversity modulation of mineral black clay to achieve ecological restoration of open-pit mine dump. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Su, R.; Xue, R.; Ma, X.; Zeng, Z.; Li, L.; Wang, S. Targeted improvement of narrow micropores in porous carbon for enhancing trace benzene vapor removal: Revealing the adsorption mechanism via experimental and molecular simulation. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2024, 671, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luo, Y.; Gong, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Huang, S.; Su, R.; Ma, X.; Yan, W. The impact of neglected potassium in KOH-activated porous carbon on CO2 capture and CO2/N2 selectivity: Experimental and molecular simulation studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 681, 161571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Luo, Y.; Fang, M.; Wang, H.; Dai, X.; Su, R.; Ma, X. Revealing the adsorption mechanisms of methanol on lithium-doped porous carbon through experimental and theoretical calculations. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gao, J.; Deng, G.; Jiang, H.; Ma, Q.; Wen, Y.; He, C.; Guo, Y.; Cao, Y. Water quality management of micro swamp wetland based on the “source-transfer-sink” theory: A case study of Momoge Swamp Wetland in Songnen Plain, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 446, 141450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sebastián-González, E.; Green, A.J. Reduction of avian diversity in created versus natural and restored wetlands. Ecography 2016, 39, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carvalho, A.C.; Pereira, I.M.; Lima, A.O.d.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Rech, A.R.; Siqueira, W.K.; Fernandes, G.W. Reintroduction of native species in an ecological restoration program from a quartzite area of campos rupestres. Plant Soil 2024, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, X.; Gu, X.; Wang, Q.; Gao, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X. Production scheduling optimization considering ecological costs for open pit metal mines. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dong, Z.; Bian, Z.; Jin, W.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, C.; Guan, D. An integrated approach to prioritizing ecological restoration of abandoned mine lands based on cost-benefit analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 924, 171579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Shang, J.; Niu, W. Research on the impacting mechanism and enhancement strategies for the effect of safety regulation in Chinese coal mine. Resour. Policy 2024, 91, 104918. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bulovic, N.; McIntyre, N.; Trancoso, R. Climate change risks to mine closure. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 465, 142697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Capichoni, M.J.; Flexa, d.C.A.; Sanjuan, d.M.S.P.; Mota, d.S.G.; Frois, C.C.; Silvio, R.; Markus, G. Species selection for optimizing mine land rehabilitation: Integrating functional traits with the minimum set prioritization technique. Ecol. Eng. 2023, 194, 107039. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao, W.; Wu, S.; Chen, X.; Shen, J.; Wei, F.; Li, D.; Liu, L.; Li, S. How would ecological restoration affect multiple ecosystem service supplies and tradeoffs? A study of mine tailings restoration in China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 153, 110451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. An, S.; Yuan, L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, D. Ground subsidence monitoring in based on UAV-LiDAR technology: A case study of a mine in the Ordos, China. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 2024, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sihan, P.; Nisha, B.; Shijia, W.; Asa, G.; Mohammadmehdi, S.; Yi, P. Mapping vertical distribution of SOC and TN in reclaimed mine soils using point and imaging spectroscopy. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 158, 111437. [Google Scholar]
  55. Spanidis, P.M.; Pavloudakis, F.; Roumpos, C. Knowledge gaps in mining operations: Empirical evidence from the greek lignite mining industry. Mater. Proc. 2023, 15, 15. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kragt, M.E.; Ana, M. Identifying industry practice, barriers, and opportunities for mine rehabilitation completion criteria in western Australia. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 287, 112258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hwang, Y.K.; Díez, Á.S.; Lotz, R.I. The effects of critical mineral endowments on green economic growth in Latin America. Resour. Policy 2024, 98, 105355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meng, D.; Bao, N.; Tayier, K.; Li, Q.; Yang, T. A remote sensing based index for assessing long-term ecological impact in arid mined land. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2024, 22, 100364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gong, B.; Shu, C.; Han, S.; Cheng, S.-G. Mine Vegetation Identification via Ecological Monitoring and Deep Belief Network. Plants 2021, 10, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Song, L.; Qiao, J.; Zhang, F.; Kong, X.; Li, H.; Luan, S.; Zhang, Q.; Kang, Z.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Z. An ecological remediation model combining optimal substrate amelioration and native hyperaccumulator colonization in non-ferrous metal tailings pond. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 322, 116141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bashir, Z.; Raj, D.; Selvasembian, R. A combined bibliometric and sustainable approach of phytostabilization towards eco-restoration of coal mine overburden dumps. Chemosphere 2024, 363, 142774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Stella, d.l.T.; Citlalli, M. Primate Conservation Efforts and Sustainable Development Goals in Ecuador, Combining Research, Education and Capacity Building. Animals 2022, 12, 2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Z.; Luo, K.; Zhao, Y.; Lechner, A.M.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Q.; Sha, W.; Wang, Y. Modelling regional ecological security pattern and restoration priorities after long-term intensive open-pit coal mining. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Santin, L.H.; Gagen, E.J.; Erskine, P.D. Setting restorative goals with a regional outlook: Mine-rehabilitation outcomes influence landscape connectivity. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 357, 120778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gastauer, M.; Pinheiro, T.; Caldeira, C.F.; Ramos, S.J.; Coelho, R.R.; Fonseca, D.S.; Tyski, L.; Cardoso, A.L.d.R.; Neto, C.d.S.C.; Guimarães, L.; et al. Large-scale forest restoration generates comprehensive biodiversity gains in an Amazonian mining site. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 443, 140959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, R. The Importance, Strategies, and Future Prospects of Mine Ecological Restoration. Resources 2025, 14, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14070105

AMA Style

Su R. The Importance, Strategies, and Future Prospects of Mine Ecological Restoration. Resources. 2025; 14(7):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14070105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Rongkui. 2025. "The Importance, Strategies, and Future Prospects of Mine Ecological Restoration" Resources 14, no. 7: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14070105

APA Style

Su, R. (2025). The Importance, Strategies, and Future Prospects of Mine Ecological Restoration. Resources, 14(7), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14070105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop