Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Could Education for Sustainable Development Benefit from a Systems Thinking Approach?
Previous Article in Journal
Close the Loop! System Dynamics Modelling in Service Design
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systemic Semantics: A Systems Approach to Building Ontologies and Concept Maps
Article

Conceptualizing Shadow IT Integration Drawbacks from a Systemic Viewpoint

1
Institute for Process Control (kips), Konstanz University of Applied Sciences, Alfred-Wachtel-Str. 8, D-78462 Konstanz, Germany
2
Faculty of Computer Science, Augsburg University of Applied Sciences, An der Hochschule 1, D-86161 Augsburg, Germany
3
Department of Information Systems, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Silbermannstr. 2, D-09599 Freiberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2018, 6(4), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6040042
Received: 30 October 2018 / Revised: 23 November 2018 / Accepted: 29 November 2018 / Published: 3 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Systems Thinking)
Business units are increasingly able to fuel the transformation that digitalization demands of organizations. Thereby, they can implement Shadow IT (SIT) without involving a central IT department to create flexible and innovative solutions. Self-reinforcing effects lead to an intertwinement of SIT with the organization. As a result, high complexities, redundancies, and sometimes even lock-ins occur. IT Integration suggests itself to meet these challenges. However, it can also eliminate the benefits that SIT presents. To help organizations in this area of conflict, we are conducting a literature review including a systematic search and an analysis from a systemic viewpoint using path dependency and switching costs. Our resulting conceptual framework for SIT integration drawbacks classifies the drawbacks into three dimensions. The first dimension consists of switching costs that account for the financial, procedural, and emotional drawbacks and the drawbacks from a loss of SIT benefits. The second dimension includes organizational, technical, and level-spanning criteria. The third dimension classifies the drawbacks into the global level, the local level, and the interaction between them. We contribute to the scientific discussion by introducing a systemic viewpoint to the research on shadow IT. Practitioners can use the presented criteria to collect evidence to reach an IT integration decision. View Full-Text
Keywords: shadow IT; IT integration; IT integration drawbacks; application integration; path dependency; path biography; switching costs shadow IT; IT integration; IT integration drawbacks; application integration; path dependency; path biography; switching costs
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Huber, M.; Zimmermann, S.; Rentrop, C.; Felden, C. Conceptualizing Shadow IT Integration Drawbacks from a Systemic Viewpoint. Systems 2018, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6040042

AMA Style

Huber M, Zimmermann S, Rentrop C, Felden C. Conceptualizing Shadow IT Integration Drawbacks from a Systemic Viewpoint. Systems. 2018; 6(4):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6040042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huber, Melanie, Stephan Zimmermann, Christopher Rentrop, and Carsten Felden. 2018. "Conceptualizing Shadow IT Integration Drawbacks from a Systemic Viewpoint" Systems 6, no. 4: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6040042

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop