Next Article in Journal
Carbon Regulations and Second-Hand Ship Prices: An Empirical Analysis of Emission Intensity Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Metacybernetics: Aspect Traits and Fractal Patterns in Higher-Order Cybernetics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Evolution and Functional Differentiation of the Global Container Port Network: A Systems Perspective (2014–2024)

School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(5), 498; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050498
Submission received: 10 March 2026 / Revised: 13 April 2026 / Accepted: 20 April 2026 / Published: 1 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Supply Chain Management)

Abstract

Port competition is increasingly shaped by network structures and differentiated functional roles rather than isolated capacity-based comparisons. This study investigates the structural evolution and functional differentiation of the global container port network from a systems perspective by integrating port-cluster identification with role-based functional evaluation. A CONCOR-based approach is employed to delineate structurally cohesive port clusters, while the rank-sum ratio (RSR) method is used to assess ports’ dominant functional roles, including High-Efficiency core, Bridge-Control, and free-form bridging functions. Based on a comparative analysis of network data for 2014 and 2024, the results reveal a transition from a relatively dispersed and multi-polar configuration toward a more concentrated and hierarchical system. Three recurrent spatial structures are identified, reflecting differentiated patterns of trunk connectivity, corridor organisation, and adaptive network flexibility. Functionally, core hubs have expanded their coverage of mainline services, Bridge-Control ports have become increasingly concentrated at strategic chokepoints and transition zones, and free-form bridging ports have enhanced routing flexibility by linking structurally non-overlapping subnetworks. These findings advance understanding of the evolving structure and interdependence of global port competition and provide insights for system-level coordination, cluster-based governance, and coordinated infrastructure planning.
Keywords: container port network; structural evolution; functional differentiation; maritime transport network; port clusters; complex networks; CONCOR; rank-sum ratio container port network; structural evolution; functional differentiation; maritime transport network; port clusters; complex networks; CONCOR; rank-sum ratio

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Yue, J.; Huang, Q. Structural Evolution and Functional Differentiation of the Global Container Port Network: A Systems Perspective (2014–2024). Systems 2026, 14, 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050498

AMA Style

Li Y, Yue J, Huang Q. Structural Evolution and Functional Differentiation of the Global Container Port Network: A Systems Perspective (2014–2024). Systems. 2026; 14(5):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yan, Jiafei Yue, and Qingbo Huang. 2026. "Structural Evolution and Functional Differentiation of the Global Container Port Network: A Systems Perspective (2014–2024)" Systems 14, no. 5: 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050498

APA Style

Li, Y., Yue, J., & Huang, Q. (2026). Structural Evolution and Functional Differentiation of the Global Container Port Network: A Systems Perspective (2014–2024). Systems, 14(5), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop