Next Article in Journal
Pressure Wave Propagation Optimization Models for Supply Chain Risk Mitigation
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Carbon Production Strategies of Manufacturing Firms Under Free-Riding and Technology Spillovers: A Moran Process Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AI-Based Model for Maintaining Good Healthcare Quality Against Cybersecurity Risks

by
Abdullah M. Algarni
1,* and
Vijey Thayananthan
2
1
Computer Science Department, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Computer Engineering, Institute of Inner City Learning, Birmingham Campus, University of Wales, Birmingham B1 2RA, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(3), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030315
Submission received: 4 February 2026 / Revised: 10 March 2026 / Accepted: 14 March 2026 / Published: 17 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Artificial Intelligence and Digital Systems Engineering)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has strong potential in health monitoring systems to support high-quality healthcare while mitigating cybersecurity risks. AI-based solutions for health and wellness applications, particularly for cardiovascular disease monitoring, are being explored to address complex healthcare challenges and improve patient outcomes. The integration of quantum and AI-based techniques is also gaining attention for enhancing future healthcare applications and communication technologies. Purpose: The primary objective is to improve cardiac care by accurately predicting symptoms and mitigating cyber-risks that threaten digital health integrity. By leveraging Integrated Quantum Networks (IQNs) and AI-driven protocols, this research aims to reduce the prevalence/incidence of non-communicable diseases by 50% by 2035 through proactive prevention and superior treatment management. Method: The framework utilizes AI-based techniques and AI-quantum-enhanced sensors and IQN to build a secure, proactive monitoring system. This theoretical framework integrates high-precision data collection with robust risk management systems to protect against vulnerabilities in digital health infrastructure. These components work in tandem to ensure that sensitive medical data remain resilient against emerging cyber threats. Anticipated Results and Conclusions: The system is expected to improve cybersecurity resilience, system performance, and energy efficiency (EE), supporting the development of secure and advanced future healthcare applications.

1. Introduction

Over the past decade, the healthcare sector has undergone a rapid digital transformation, fueled by advancements in technologies such as Electronic Health Records (EHRs), cloud computing, the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), telemedicine platforms, and data-driven clinical decision support systems [1,2,3]. These innovations have significantly enhanced healthcare delivery and patient outcomes by facilitating real-time health monitoring, increasing operational efficiency, and ensuring the accessibility of medical services regardless of time or location [4]. However, this growing reliance on interconnected digital infrastructures has simultaneously expanded the attack surface, escalating security and privacy threats while exposing healthcare environments to high-risk vulnerabilities [5].
Healthcare organizations have become primary targets for cyberattacks due to the critical nature of medical services and the high value of sensitive patient data facilitated by communication networks [6,7]. Various threats—including ransomware, data breaches, insider threats, Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, and vulnerabilities within Internet of Things (IoT) medical devices—have caused significant operational disruptions, financial and reputational losses, and, in extreme cases, direct hazards to patient safety [8,9,10]. Consequently, research indicates that the healthcare sector continues to experience the highest data breach costs compared to all other industries, driven by regulatory fines, system outages, and extensive recovery efforts [11]. Maintaining robust cybersecurity while providing high-quality healthcare has therefore emerged as a critical imperative for modern medical institutions.
Conventional security techniques in healthcare environments primarily rely on rule-based systems, intrusion detection systems (IDSs), encryption mechanisms, and access control policies [12]. While these methods are effective at identifying known threats, they often prove inadequate against sophisticated and dynamic attack vectors, such as zero-day exploits and Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) [13]. Furthermore, the high false-alarm rates associated with static security solutions can lead to “alert fatigue”, ultimately resulting in delayed incident responses [14]. These limitations underscore the urgent need for intelligent, adaptive security frameworks capable of autonomously responding to an evolving threat landscape.
AI and Machine Learning (ML) have emerged as transformative technologies for enhancing cybersecurity capabilities across diverse domains [15]. AI-based models excel at real-time anomaly detection, complex pattern recognition, and the processing of vast volumes of heterogeneous data [16]. These methodologies have been successfully deployed in cybersecurity applications for behavioral analysis, malware classification, intrusion detection, and predictive threat intelligence [17,18,19]. Compared to conventional methods, AI-driven security systems offer superior detection accuracy, adaptive learning capabilities, and automated response mechanisms, enabling a more proactive defense posture.
Within the healthcare sector, AI is increasingly being investigated to address security challenges unique to medical environments [20]. AI-based solutions have been proposed for monitoring unauthorized access to EHRs, detecting behavioral anomalies in IoMT devices, and safeguarding healthcare networks against sophisticated cyberattacks [21]. However, securing healthcare systems presents distinct challenges, including stringent regulatory and legal frameworks—such as HIPAA and GDPR—the extreme sensitivity of medical data, and the requirement for high system transparency and reliability [22]. Furthermore, security mechanisms must not disrupt clinical workflows or jeopardize system availability, as delays or failures in healthcare delivery can have potentially fatal consequences for patient safety.
The AI-based diagnostic agents mentioned in Figure 1 for remote patient monitoring can be improved when a quantum enhancement layer is considered. However, data privacy and security challenges remain significant concerns in AI-driven healthcare systems [23]. In addition, biases cannot be fully monitored, as human behavior depends on complex mental conditions influenced by both internal and external risks.
Although wearables and sensors for cardiac biomarker detection are currently available, AI-based quantum proactive systems represent a superior paradigm for future digital health applications. Global environmental conditions and modern lifestyles are driving an increase in cardiovascular issues, necessitating the speed and precision offered by quantum sensors, quantum routing, and IQN. According to [24,25,26], identifying cardiorespiratory issues requires advanced techniques to enhance monitoring accuracy. This research proposes an integrated framework utilizing AI-based diagnostic agents and quantum protocols to monitor cardiac health proactively, potentially alleviating the clinical burden and hospital waiting lists. By leveraging the latest approaches—including blockchain, risk management, and quantum cryptography—this model aims to minimize both medical and cybersecurity risks [27,28,29,30].
Furthermore, the transition to AI-driven management must address both direct clinical challenges and indirect factors such as regulatory compliance and non-clinical risks [31,32,33,34,35]. A critical balance must be maintained between rigorous security and system usability; while inadequate protection invites threats, excessive restrictions can impede clinical productivity [36,37]. Current research often prioritizes threat detection in isolation, but this proposal focuses on a holistic framework that preserves operational efficiency and service continuity. This is particularly vital for Assistive Technology (AT), where individuals with disabilities rely on secure, uninterrupted healthcare facilities. By deploying lightweight, real-time AI-based diagnostic agents supported by Explainable AI (XAI), this research provides localized data processing with minimal latency, ensuring that the transformative potential of quantum technology is both transparent and safe for diverse user groups.
In this research, we managed our analysis according to the following two questions:
  • How are good health and well-being managed alongside machine life?
  • Does modern technology protect the environmental conditions that allow us to maintain good health and well-being?
The aim of this research is to improve existing proactive systems used in cardiovascular disease analysis. These improvements can be achieved through AI-based quantum technology, which enhances the performance of cardiac measurements and the accuracy of predictions in various environmental conditions. The specific objectives of this research include:
  • Learning the potential cardiac risks, future cardiac attacks, and cardiac symptoms associated with technology-based lifestyles and the mental conditions of busy environments; exploring the extent to which users and service providers can utilize AI-based quantum proactive systems for cardiovascular diseases.
  • Building an efficient theoretical framework for an AI-based quantum proactive system that provides early predictions on IQN-based services between users’ devices, specifically for those using wearables and continuous monitoring facilities.
  • Developing AI-based quantum algorithms and solutions using AI, quantum routing, and sensor technologies while ensuring that these techniques are secure, cost-effective, and have low energy consumption with maximum energy efficiency (EE).
  • Maintaining AI-based quantum proactive systems and wearable and monitoring devices for cardiovascular diseases while addressing environmental challenges during healthcare service delivery.
In this study, AI-based components were categorized into two functional categories: (i) AI-based diagnostic agents, responsible for real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, feature analysis, and predictive modeling; and (ii) AI-based healthcare treatment agents, responsible for treatment planning, therapy optimization, and personalized healthcare decision support. This distinction ensures architectural clarity and functional separation within advanced AI-enabled healthcare systems.
The rest of this paper presents a framework for secure AI and quantum-based healthcare communication and monitoring systems, organized into seven sections. Section 2 provides a literature review of the cybersecurity risks, AI-based healthcare communication, and emerging quantum technologies in digital health, while Section 3 introduces the proposed AI–quantum framework for proactive healthcare monitoring, integrating AI analytics, quantum sensors, and Integrated Quantum Networks (IQN) to ensure resilient security and performance efficiency. Section 4 evaluates the system’s cybersecurity resilience and energy efficiency using healthcare risks, including an analysis of vulnerabilities within the architecture. Section 5 offers a comparative analysis of human-centric approaches, traditional AI, and the proposed model, followed by Section 6, which highlights current challenges within the AI–quantum ecosystem. Finally, Section 7 concludes the study and outlines future research directions for developing adaptive healthcare systems that provide personalized treatment based on real-time patient health conditions.

2. Literature Review

AI has become a pivotal facilitator in modern healthcare, optimizing operational efficiency while providing sophisticated cybersecurity. As clinical reliance on interconnected digital infrastructures grows, safeguarding sensitive data and ensuring service continuity are paramount. Unlike conventional static defenses, AI-driven security systems offer real-time threat identification and automated response capabilities. By analyzing evolving system behaviors and non-linear attack patterns, these intelligent frameworks mitigate complex cyber threats while preserving healthcare quality, system availability, and patient safety.

2.1. Integration of AI-Based Models and Quantum Sensors to Maintain Good Healthcare

The foundational objective of integrating AI into the medical domain is the enhancement of operational quality, precision, and service delivery. Reference [38] provides an early foundational analysis of this trajectory, accurately predicting the contemporary shift toward highly interconnected and data-intensive systems. In this synergistic environment, the convergence of AI, ML, and advanced imaging creates an ecosystem where technologies interact to amplify their collective efficacy. This improvement is increasingly specialized to address individual diseases; for instance, cardiac disease requires dedicated devices and management systems where AI must accurately diagnose pain and determine infection rates to ensure the patient’s immune system and overall wellness are preserved. This evolution is most evident in the development of sophisticated diagnostic tools that bridge the gap between hospital and home care. For instance, reference [24] presents a portable wearable cardiorespiratory sensor integrated with smartphone technology for real-time monitoring. By utilizing advanced materials like plastic optical fiber, this AI-based device enhances early diagnostics, setting a precedent for future innovations in IQN and quantum sensing.
Maintaining operational quality often relies on the ability to monitor chronic conditions without compromising patient comfort or data accuracy. Reference [39] introduced a secure, AI-enabled integration of the IoT and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) to assist clinicians in diagnosing conditions like diabetes and heart disease. Similarly, reference [40] reviewed digital health technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors, which demonstrated that quality is maintained through comprehensive telehealth and data synthesis. To further these efficiencies, modern sensors—specifically quantum sensors—are now enabling service providers to maintain a broader spectrum of care, including mental health. Through applications in advanced MRI and quantum magnetometers for brain imaging and drug development, these sensors enhance the facility to maintain wellness against security risks while utilizing resource mapping to analyze specific risks related to mental healthcare.
Furthermore, the application of AI in specialized fields such as ophthalmology and respiratory medicine illustrates the breadth of this operational revolution. Reference [41] examined the transformative potential of AI in global ophthalmology, noting that AI-assisted imaging has already achieved significant advancements in detection precision. In acute care, Baral and Roy [26] proposed a hybrid framework that integrates quantum principles with classical AI to enhance pneumonia detection via chest X-rays. This proactive detection strategy is critical for reducing mortality rates, yet it highlights a persistent challenge: contemporary AI-driven cybersecurity solutions frequently prioritize detection efficacy at the expense of maintaining holistic healthcare quality, often failing to account for clinical workflow efficiency [42]. Consequently, maintaining quality requires a balance where security measures do not introduce friction into time-critical diagnostic processes or patient throughput.
Table 1 summarizes the upcoming quantum and AI-based sensing technologies that improve healthcare quality and cybersecurity. The technologies are divided into four categories: quantum dots, quantum sensing, quantum imaging, and quantum resonance, with each contributing to safe and intelligent healthcare monitoring. Quantum dot-based systems, such as aspirin-based carbon dots, nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots, and quantum dot–DNA bioconjugates, allow for reliable communication, data validation, and real-time physiological monitoring via wearable pulse oximeters. Quantum sensing technologies, such as magnetic-field and nanodiamond sensors, increase diagnostic accuracy and help cure neurodegenerative illnesses. Meanwhile, quantum imaging technologies like 3D quantum imaging and SQUIDs improve medical imaging accuracy and validity. Under quantum resonance, the Nvision Polarizer monitors brain function via neuron-level quantum interactions. Collectively, these technologies boost healthcare systems by combining quantum intelligence, data security, and diagnostic efficiency, resulting in a resilient and adaptable AI-powered healthcare infrastructure.

2.2. Advanced AI and Security Models for Mitigating Cybersecurity Risks

As healthcare quality becomes increasingly dependent on digital integrity, the development of robust models to mitigate cybersecurity risks has become paramount. Reference [43] provides a comprehensive analysis of the diverse cyber threats targeting the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and proposes a robust intrusion detection system (IDS) utilizing Deep Learning (DL) models. These technological defenses must account for the fact that healthcare delivery is highly individualized; service quality often varies according to the specific disease, the affected area of the human body, and the specific nursing protocols implemented in public or private organizations. While traditional systems might miss non-linear attack patterns, DL models ensure the continuity of reliable services even as nursing activities modernize and integrate with digital systems. To manage the complexities of distributed data, reference [44] proposes the MUSE framework, which utilizes a hierarchical approach to secure data across multi-cloud environments. This is critical because, as nurses handle sensitive infection rate data and patient-specific metrics, vulnerabilities such as data breaches or cyber-attacks that manipulate infection data have emerged as significant threats to maintaining high-quality care.
The integration of blockchain technology serves as a critical component in many of these defensive models, acting as an immutable ledger for sensitive logs. Reference [45] proposes a unique framework that synergizes AI, IoT, and blockchain to cultivate smarter and more resilient e-health data applications. This holistic approach uses blockchain for decentralized trust and AI for proactive threat detection, effectively mitigating vulnerabilities found in standalone solutions. Similarly, reference [46] introduces the BICS-AI framework, a lightweight solution designed specifically for the IoMT to ensure that security protocols do not impede high-speed medical data transmission. These models are further bolstered by reference [47], which delineates a “triple threat” defense strategy—leveraging AI for detection, blockchain for integrity, and IoMT for patient connectivity.
The growing healthcare attack surface is further contextualized by recent IoT security research. A comprehensive five-year study [48] categorized vulnerabilities into device-level, communication-layer, and cloud/middleware threats, along with data manipulation, botnet-based DDoS, and privacy risks. These categories directly align with IoMT infrastructures, where healthcare hubs and wearable sensors operate in dispersed environments.
Furthermore, contemporary detection techniques—including blockchain-enabled trust frameworks, hybrid signature–behavioral models, and AI-driven intrusion detection—underscore the necessity of integrating quantum-enhanced security with AI analytics. By aligning the healthcare attack surface with recognized IoT threat taxonomies and defense models, such approaches can be grounded in a robust, verified cybersecurity foundation that addresses the practical feasibility and resilience required in medical environments.
Beyond classical models, the field is shifting toward quantum-level security. References [32,33] examined the dual nature of innovation in digital health, advocating for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and specialized quantum image encryption as definitive safeguards. These frameworks provide “unbreakable” encryption for telemedicine and radiology, ensuring that diagnostic assets like MRIs remain confidential and tamper-proof. This is supported by references [34,35], which focused on optimizing IQN to improve system performance and energy efficiency while reducing latency in healthcare AI environments. Specialized applications also exist in oncology and pharmaceuticals; reference [30] introduced a quantum network-driven deep learning framework to enhance predictive accuracy in testicular cancer management, while reference [31] explored how the intersection of blockchain and quantum computing (QC) can secure the pharmaceutical supply chain. Additionally, reference [49] leveraged blockchain to ensure the integrity of medical imaging. Finally, reference [50] utilized a CMTL algorithm within an Edge of Things (EoT) architecture, overcoming the problem of limited labeled medical security data.
Reference [51] enhanced the resilience of cybersecurity solutions within AT and AI-based assistive systems by advocating for the comprehensive implementation of secure AI-based diagnostic agents within AT and assistive systems, as shown in Figure 2. This model demonstrates that risk assessment procedures can be seamlessly integrated into AI-driven assistive management systems to identify cyber threats targeting users during e-learning activities, particularly for visually impaired individuals.
An AI-based healthcare treatment agent for assistive management enhances the overall healthcare quality when assistive users’ links and communication channels are risk-free. This means that cyber-attacks and related threats should be minimized using quantum technologies such as quantum sensors. Quantum algorithms and techniques allow healthcare service providers to handle more monitoring activities according to the types of health issues.

2.3. Governance, Risk Management, and the Ethics of AI-Based Healthcare Quality

Maintaining healthcare quality requires not only technical solutions but also robust governance and ethical frameworks to manage the sociotechnical risks associated with AI. Reference [52] introduced a novel framework focused on quantified risk assessment for IoMT systems, enabling healthcare providers to systematically measure and rank cybersecurity threats. This metric-driven methodology is essential because, as reference [53] observes, existing government initiatives are often insufficient to protect the decentralized attack surface of modern medical devices. The literature suggests that a critical lag exists between technological adoption and security research; a bibliometric analysis in reference [54] revealed significant research gaps in organizational structures, human behavior, and strategic management. These gaps often result in successful assaults on medical infrastructure that lead to delayed treatments and financial losses.
The regulatory landscape plays a vital role in balancing innovation with security. Reference [55] provides a critical legal and technical synthesis of the cybersecurity landscape, contrasting implementation challenges with the EU’s evolving regulatory framework, including the AI Act and Medical Device Regulation (MDR). These laws establish stringent requirements for risk management and transparency in “Software as a Medical Device”. Similarly, reference [23] investigated the tension between rapid innovation and data protection laws within India’s digital health infrastructure, identifying systemic barriers such as legal ambiguities and infrastructure constraints. To proactively identify these threats, reference [56] employed advanced text mining techniques to analyze cybercrime in digital healthcare, identifying common threat actors and their targeting strategies.
The human-centric aspect of healthcare remains a primary ethical concern. Reference [57] conducted a qualitative investigation into public perceptions of AI, revealing that while patients value accelerated diagnostics, they are deeply concerned about algorithmic bias, privacy, and the potential for systemic errors. This highlights that the integration of AI remains constrained by sociotechnical barriers, where the “black-box” nature of advanced models hinders the clinical trust necessary for widespread adoption [48,57]. To address these risks holistically, reference [58] advocates for a multi-layered framework that integrates technical encryption with organizational strategies like employee training and incident response plans. Furthermore, the future of healthcare defense is likely to involve self-adaptive AI capable of autonomously adjusting parameters to meet evolving threats without human intervention [59]. By bridging the gap between technical exploits and legislative oversight, these frameworks ensure that AI-based models remain resilient, ethical, and patient-centered, thereby preserving the ultimate quality of care.

2.4. Research Gaps in Recent Studies

Despite considerable progress in AI-driven healthcare cybersecurity, most research remains siloed, focusing on discrete elements such as intrusion detection, blockchain-based data integrity, or cloud security. A cohesive AI-quantum proactive framework—one that integrates adaptive risk mitigation, bias control, and quantum-enhanced sensing—remains significantly under-explored.
To ground our methodology, we provide a comparative analysis (Table 2) that categorizes the existing literature by research focus and critical findings. This analysis offers an interpretive evaluation of the primary literature, highlighting technical deficiencies, contradictions, and controversies within the field. By identifying these specific weaknesses and research bottlenecks, we reinforce the theoretical and methodological foundations of our study. These identified gaps directly inform our proposed framework, which leverages quantum-enhanced sensing and optimization to resolve existing limitations in performance, resilience, and healthcare delivery quality.
Although an integrated framework combining AI and quantum technology is expected to address both current and future demands in healthcare applications, the proactive monitoring system within the proposed framework can further enhance healthcare quality, including cardiac care, through improved or optimized AI and quantum technologies. As planned, we were unable to analyze empirical data obtained from quantum sensors that detect quality-related issues in healthcare. Therefore, we proposed a theoretical framework using a qualitative approach, which provides new directions for future simulations on quantum computers and related hardware.
Instead of relying on a practical testbed and simulations at this stage, the study focuses on theoretical evidence to support the proposed model. For instance, the theoretical results indicate performance improvements when a larger number of qubits is utilized. Such evidence can help reduce complexity during the optimization of accuracy and calibration in healthcare devices.
In Figure 1, the quantum enhancement layer functions as a computational accelerator that improves the decision-making process and explores additional solution options under uncertainty, including variable conditions such as weather. Although the figure illustrates the main concept, further improvements to the agent can be achieved through the following aspects:
  • Hybrid quantum architecture: Quantum modules handle optimization tasks to improve computational quality and system performance.
  • Learning efficiency: For AI agents, the enhancement layer integrates advanced AI algorithms to improve learning capabilities through machine learning techniques, particularly reinforcement learning and probabilistic models. This supports users and trainees in understanding emerging healthcare challenges and related applications.
  • Faster optimization: AI agents in healthcare development improve technical performance by efficiently solving optimization problems related to resource allocation and healthcare management.
  • Energy optimization and scalability: The quantum enhancement layer can be conceptually viewed as a cognitive accelerator that supports neural-inspired processing and energy-efficient computation. It enables faster reasoning, broader exploration of solution spaces, and improved handling of uncertainty, such as identifying optimal states and system configurations.

3. Proposed Research

The proposed techniques and methodologies within this research aim to enhance and maintain robust healthcare security across all operational environments. By leveraging AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents, researchers can develop specialized models tailored to diverse healthcare services. This approach integrates AI techniques with quantum algorithms and sensors to provide a high-performance yet low-cost solution. Specifically, this research focused on security and risk mitigation through the implementation of secure AI quantum sensors and IQN. By introducing comprehensive risk management and assessment protocols, the proposed theoretical framework establishes a proactive AI-quantum system for cardiac monitoring, ensuring the integrity of health and wellness applications. The integration of quantum sensors into this AI-based model represents the primary technical advancement and core methodology of the system, emphasizing the role of the framework in proactive monitoring, risk reduction, and the improvement of healthcare quality KPIs through AI and quantum-enhanced techniques.
As illustrated in Figure 3, states of 0 and 1 are in different locations because the state changes and properties are explained in the quantum principle. State changes of 0 and 1 allow healthcare service providers to monitor healthcare extremely accurately. Quantum sensors can be modified according to types of healthcare monitoring. Furthermore, the quantum bits (Qubits) can be represented as given below.
Qubit can be 0, 1, or a superposition of both, but it allows us to represent probabilities for both states simultaneously. To store the large healthcare data, qubits will be better because a single qubit does not store two bits. Furthermore, it holds information about two states (0 and 1), but collapses to just one bit (0 or 1) when measured.
The real power is exponential when many qubits are used rather than binary bits (digital representation). A 64-qubit quantum computer can process 36 billion bytes of information in each step of computation.
Classical AI systems in healthcare and cardiac care typically rely on binary bits (0 and 1) during information processing. In contrast, qubits enhance the computational space exponentially by enabling the simultaneous representation of 0 and 1 through superposition. This capability allows mathematical models to efficiently explore multiple features in healthcare and cardiac care applications in parallel.
This is a matrix equation:
A B = a 11 B a 12 B a 1 n B a 21 B a 22 B a m 1 a m n B
Using a matrix equation, a single quantum bit can be written as:
0 = 0 = 1 0 = [ 1 0 ] T
Double qubits (2 qubits) can also be written as:
00 = 0 0 = 1 0 1 0 = [ 1 0 0 0 ] T
In 2 qubits, four possible computational states exist: 00, 01, 10, and 11. In a three-qubit system, eight possible combinations can be formed, starting from 000 and extending to all permutations of the binary states. Triple-qubit (three-qubit) systems can be represented and organized using the corresponding matrix equation described above.
000 = 0 0 0 = 1 0 1 0 1 0 = [ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] T
Quantum routing, based on fundamental quantum principles such as superposition, entanglement, and interference, enables the dynamic selection of optimal computational paths for analyzing healthcare and cardiac care data. Comparing classical AI approaches with quantum-enhanced techniques, including quantum routing, demonstrates potential improvements in the accuracy of cardiac symptom prediction in the following aspects:
  • High-dimensional computation and data representation: Quantum-based techniques can model complex and nonlinear relationships in cardiac symptom prediction, such as correlations among blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and ECG patterns.
  • Quantum architecture with hybrid techniques: Hybrid quantum–classical models enable improved prediction and detection of heart-related conditions and identification of subtle risk patterns in cardiac data. Examples include quantum–classical dual neural networks and other integrated architectures.
  • Optimization of accuracy across KPIs: To enhance predictive performance in evaluating heart disease-related KPIs, quantum optimization methods—such as quantum-inspired genetic algorithms or quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNNs)—can be applied.
Table 3 shows the healthcare quality, and when quantum techniques were considered, some healthcare features used as examples provided the expected numerical values, which allow researchers to analyze the security and risks.
To improve the quality of healthcare against the cybersecurity risks, the quantum principle (Figure 4) enhances the possibilities of finding solutions in many directions concurrently or in parallel. Furthermore, theoretical healthcare requirements may be considered when healthcare service providers analyze the specific type of healthcare through these AI-based model components.
All types of healthcare signals obtained from devices, services, and attackers have to be considered to analyze the quality of healthcare, as in Figure 4. Quantum principles are important steps in order to improve the healthcare performance metrics according to the types of health issues and diseases. Although quantum principles enhance the robustness of the healthcare system, adaptive quantum techniques (AQTs) improve the quality of healthcare communication channels and devices. Here, AQT includes adaptive quantum algorithms with adaptive quantum circuits, adaptive quantum control, etc. Furthermore, AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents can be built to improve the healthcare quality issues simultaneously according to the types of healthcare monitoring.

3.1. Problem Statement

Maintaining high-quality healthcare remains a continuous challenge due to various risks affecting healthcare systems under different conditions. Healthcare service providers must ensure consistent service quality despite threats such as cyber-attacks, system biases, accidental errors, and human behavioral factors. These risks reduce the effectiveness of healthcare services and management worldwide, where achieving good health and well-being continues to face challenges caused by environmental conditions, disasters, and technological limitations.
Healthcare research often addresses specific technical issues within short timeframes; however, maintaining long-term healthcare quality and wellness using modern technologies such as AI and quantum approaches remains a major challenge. This research focused on minimizing and preventing risks related to cardiac issues, associated symptoms, and monitoring problems, including cybersecurity risks affecting proactive infection prediction and disease detection systems.
Assistive Technology (AT) also requires continuous improvement because vulnerabilities in modern digital health technologies can negatively affect overall healthcare quality and wellness. Furthermore, continuous exposure to modern technology may contribute to mental stress and depression, which can impact overall well-being. Although quantum technology offers potential solutions for improving mental health and digital healthcare systems, its side effects have not yet been fully validated through comprehensive experimentation.
Additionally, maintaining healthcare quality may not be achievable in all regions, particularly in high-risk environments such as war zones or resource-limited regions. While quantum and AI technologies may reduce some challenges, they may not fully address all individual and environmental healthcare constraints.
The following examples illustrate potential problems and improvements:
Cardiac monitoring → continuous detector → traditional approach → 75% quality

                → Quantum approach→ 90% quality
 Assistive users → assistive communication technology → AI approach → 85% quality

                 → Quantum approach → 94% quality
Mental healthcare → Neuron analyzer → sensor approach → 65% quality
      ↓
                          → Quantum sensor approach → 92% quality
Elderly healthcare → Wearable technology → AI approach → 75% quality
    ↓
                     → Proposed approach → 95% quality
Although healthcare remains a primary global concern, maintaining good health and well-being continues to face significant challenges exacerbated by environmental stressors and natural disasters. It is also noted that the continuous or excessive use of modern technology can induce mental stress and depression, negatively impacting overall well-being. The velocity of thought (VoT) is proportional to the synthesis of all observed inputs (A)—ranging from essential knowledge to extraneous data—and behaviors, as processed through the five bodily senses. To maintain cognitive integrity, physical health, and healthcare resilience against security risks, the human body must prioritize constructive knowledge and positive behavioral patterns during the thought process. Risks, vulnerabilities, and cyberattacks often originate from the negative cognitive outputs dependent on VoT. As the accumulation of detrimental data increases, a high VoT can lead individuals to make hasty, suboptimal decisions, as expressed in Equation (1):
V o T i = 1 i = N A + i = 1 i = N B 1 + i = 1 i = N B n
In Equation (1), A represents the set of all observed inputs collected by the human body through the five senses. These inputs also generate all good and bad thoughts, but risks influenced by behaviors, ranging from B 1 to B n —and the total number of active neurons ( N ).
This research, which can be completed within a six-month timeframe, addresses specific technical limitations of current medical technologies. A central challenge explored in this study is the maintenance of wellness through advanced technologies such as AI and quantum approaches. Specifically, the research focuses on minimizing and preventing risks associated with cardiac monitoring, including cybersecurity vulnerabilities in proactive systems and the accurate prediction of infections. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for improvement in AT, as modern vulnerabilities can undermine the overall quality of digital healthcare. While these technological solutions may mitigate challenges in many contexts, their efficacy remains limited in high-risk environments, such as war zones or regions with extreme poverty, where the risks to health management are exceptionally high.
While integrating quantum technology is a novel approach to addressing mental and physical healthcare improvements, its potential side effects have not yet been thoroughly tested. Although Quantum Computing (QC) has not yet reached full-scale commercial development, early research suggests that it will provide exponential speedups for complex healthcare challenges—such as molecular simulation, genomics, and precision medicine—despite its current limitations in practical, real-world adoption. This relationship is represented in Equation (2):
M = π · ( 2 n 2 3 ) · P r
The quantum calculation is considered with Grover’s algorithm (GA), which optimizes the steps used in the existing algorithm. Here, M is the number of optimized searches. When searches are reduced, the overall performance will be optimized with reasonable complexity. To calculate optimized M, the probability P r is used in Equation (2).
According to Equation (1), scientific accuracy depends on the number of neurons involved in neural activity. Although all parameters used in Equation (1) are defined, the final KPIs will depend on the number of neurons participating in the thought process. Table 4 provides examples of biases based on human behavior that may influence this thought process. By analyzing biometrics and behavioral patterns, AI techniques may support more accurate decision-making, suggesting that when behavior is negative, the associated thought processes may also be negatively influenced, and vice versa.
The speed of the thought process is expected to become an important KPI in the future, as some biases and cyberattacks can occur within fractions of a second. AI-related biases may also emerge as future challenges, potentially resulting from negative behaviors and thoughts that influence neural activities and neuron interactions.
AI-based bias refers to systematic, unfair, and prejudicial outcomes produced by artificial intelligence systems that favor or disadvantage certain groups of people based on characteristics such as race, gender, age, or socioeconomic status.
When the number of neurons involved in neural activity is estimated, it becomes possible to approximate the energy associated with thought and the Value of Thought (VoT). A thought is expected to propagate within a fraction of a microsecond from the originating neurons to the destination node (i.e., the final neuron involved in the neural activity) that executes the thought.
In Equation (1), engaging a greater number of neurons in a specific behavior contributes to the formation of a thought. However, some thoughts occur slowly, while others occur more quickly. In this context, the VoT (slow, quick, or faster) depends on the KPIs of neural activity and the energy consumed by neurons during the process.
When cardiovascular KPIs are considered for analyzing the performance of cardiac care and other healthcare services, the proposed framework can enhance the accuracy of KPI evaluation.
To further elaborate on the mathematical model and formulas, an additional study should be included in the reference list. The parameters used in its simulations can be adopted to improve the model’s accuracy through optimization techniques.
According to [61], the optimization of energy released from neurons should be analyzed in relation to the number of neurons involved in the thought process. For example, if two individuals have equal physical characteristics (i.e., identical inputs), the energy associated with their cognitive processes can still differ depending on the neural activity involved. In this context, the number of neurons participating in the thought process becomes a key parameter.
Assume that the first-person experiences minimal cognitive activity and therefore expends little neural energy within a fixed hour. In contrast, the second person engages in complex problem-solving tasks and consequently expends more neural energy during the same period. Neural activity is a real physiological process that contributes to the biological basis of thought and behavior. Thoughts emerge from patterns of neural activity, which involve electrically and chemically driven communications between neurons that enable overall brain function.
When a larger number of neurons are involved in a specific behavior compared with other behaviors, the VoT for that behavior increases. This indicates that the individual can think more rapidly and execute decisions more effectively in complex situations.

3.2. Proposed Model

Healthcare is a fundamental priority for all families, particularly as the behavioral and health management needs of the elderly must be addressed when they face mobility or functional challenges, even in the absence of chronic disease. Health management strategies and clinical activities are rapidly modernizing, influenced by factors such as technological integration, age-related immunological changes, and the management of long-term illnesses. Regarding technological solutions, healthcare hubs are increasingly utilized for self-managed care. Furthermore, these hubs can be integrated into smart home environments, allowing elderly individuals to manage age-related health conditions with greater autonomy and comfort. In smart home environments, healthcare hubs rely on wearable monitoring devices that enhance care facilities through secure, AI-driven communication channels and emerging network architectures like the IQN.
AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents are increasingly deployed across healthcare clinics because they provide disease-specific intelligent services. These models can operate under diverse environmental conditions while maintaining strong healthcare security and resilience against cyber threats. The proposed research technique integrates AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents with quantum cybersecurity mechanisms. The combination of AI and quantum technologies provides efficient healthcare solutions to mitigate risks caused by cyber-attacks and system biases during active healthcare communication. The proposed model incorporates the following quantum-enabled components:
  • Quantum algorithms: They revolutionize healthcare solutions with maximum security and high quality. Furthermore, it enhances the healthcare facilities with drug discovery, medical imaging, molecular modelling, personalized medicine, etc. They allow healthcare researchers to analyze the complex datasets and support the quantum computers, which are faster than traditional computers. These algorithms may be used: Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) for molecular simulation, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for treatment planning, and Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE).
  • Quantum optimization: Leverages quantum algorithms like Grover’s algorithm for search optimization and improves imaging quality and ensures faster diagnostics with optimized procedures.
  • Quantum machine learning (QML): Utilizes quantum computing for accelerating ML algorithms by leveraging quantum superposition and entanglement.
  • Quantum neural network architectures: Includes Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) and secure Quantum Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNNs), which are effective for handling variable-length input sequences and processing temporal data from wireless sensors with nonlinear characteristics. Communication using quantum network integration and emerging algorithms remains an active research area.
Quantum sensors offer significant potential for supporting individuals facing mental health challenges. By integrating an Integrated Quantum Network (IQN) with AI-based models and quantum sensors, communication between users and service providers can be implemented with high efficiency. This combination of AI, quantum sensing, and IQN infrastructure ensures robust healthcare delivery while mitigating security risks. Consequently, this research proposes the use of AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents with quantum sensors and IQNs to maintain high-quality healthcare across all environmental conditions and situational contexts.

3.3. Methodology

By leveraging specific digital healthcare technologies, this research designs and develops medical solutions tailored to cardiac issues. Within the proposed theoretical framework, AI-based diagnostic agents are integrated for feature management to analyze cardiac measurements during continuous monitoring. The research focuses on constructing this theoretical framework using IQNs, quantum sensors, and associated technologies to provide robust cardiac analysis.
The Enhanced Adaptive Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (EABOA) [62] is employed to optimize feature selection in heterogeneous healthcare sensor environments. It is particularly effective in wireless sensor architectures, where high-dimensional, redundant, and noisy data can reduce detection accuracy and increase computational overhead.
EABOA maximizes the selection of critical cardiac features collected from wearable and quantum sensors. By adaptively balancing exploration and exploitation, it improves global search capability and accelerates convergence. Additionally, eliminating irrelevant or manipulated features enhances real-time anomaly detection, reduces latency, and strengthens cybersecurity resilience. Overall, integrating EABOA into the AI analytics layer supports robust performance through efficient feature management and improved model convergence across diverse healthcare monitoring scenarios.
A combination of selected quantum protocols and AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents, derived from established proactive systems, is proposed to enhance response times and the accuracy of cardiac measurements across diverse environmental conditions. This approach utilizes AI-driven quantum algorithms to improve system performance while remaining cost-effective. The integration of these techniques improves the efficiency of feature management and the control of core healthcare functions.
Healthcare communication between users, service providers, and wearable monitoring devices relies on secure communication channels managed by AI-based diagnostic agents and emerging architectures such as IQN. Consequently, this research utilizes AI-based quantum sensors and routing networks within an IQN framework to enhance security through intelligent, automated continuous monitoring.
The efficacy of AI-based quantum proactive systems depends on efficient architectural design and implementation. A reliable framework infrastructure is essential to improving the overall reliability of digital health systems. To implement these approaches, a theoretical framework will be developed, incorporating specialized cardiac knowledge and technological methodologies established in prior works [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. This development will be executed through the specific phases and tasks outlined in the following methodology.
In prediction tasks, AI and quantum sensors can be integrated with specific AI models and experimental designs. In this study, we considered theoretical steps that enable conventional designs to incorporate quantum techniques and algorithms. Predictions can potentially be achieved with higher accuracy, as quantum sensors exploit quantum effects (e.g., superposition, entanglement, and quantum coherence) to measure physical quantities with ultra-high sensitivity in healthcare environments. To evaluate the quality of healthcare or cardiovascular care, AI techniques can be combined with quantum sensors to enhance performance in the following ways:
  • AI models (e.g., CNN, RNN, etc.): The proposed model can denoise quantum sensor outputs, correct drift, and calibration errors, and extract weak signals embedded in noise when healthcare devices are operational.
  • Invisible AI patterns: AI-related biases may arise because such patterns are not easily detectable by humans. For example, within neural activity measurements, energy accuracy may be influenced by subtle gravitational anomalies, minor magnetic field variations, or micro-scale changes in biological or material properties.
Proactive monitoring systems depend on data flows obtained from quantum sensors when healthcare environments are actively used for clinical and operational activities. For example, proactive risk prediction can be implemented based on predicted data derived from previous actions and historical observations. Through the AI analytics layer, final decisions and treatment actions can be supported by insights generated from proactive risk prediction models.
Adaptive calibration is essential as a preventive measure and can be continuously monitored through proactive monitoring systems, particularly when multiple healthcare devices are deployed within healthcare organizations. Proactive monitoring systems that integrate quantum sensors with AI analytics techniques can enhance decision-making and improve treatment outcomes. Furthermore, such systems enable proactive symptom prediction by leveraging quantum sensing properties. These systems are particularly suitable for deployment in high-risk environments such as healthcare facilities, defense systems, and power grids.

4. Results

According to the security risks, which include human behavior and their biases, human health and wellness are being affected. Furthermore, this kind of risk creates mental depression and bad behavior through the uncontrollable mind and thoughts. The major goal of this research is to improve health and wellness by addressing human behaviors and mental depression that creates the cardiac issues and related symptoms. Regardless of whoever has cardiac issues, they need cardiac monitoring of behaviors that include mental health and depression problems (cyber-risks of proactiveness in accurately predicting infections, etc.).

4.1. Quality Based on Security Resilience

As illustrated in Figure 5, the qubits dominated the quality of the healthcare and accuracy of the devices used in the types of healthcare according to the diseases affected during the patients’ lives.
Furthermore, the analysis of neuronal communication and its associated quantum energy ( E q ) enables researchers to collect the empirical data necessary for this framework, as expressed in Equation (3):
E q = h v
In Equation (3), h represents Planck’s constant and v denotes the velocity of light or photons; here, it is represented as the VoT. This relationship is developed in Equation (4):
N q = 2 n
Suppose that there are N q number of states in the GA calculation, each state is defined by the length of n, or the states are represented by the n-bit binary strings Equation (4).
The primary goal of the proposed project is to analyze cardiac symptoms using AI and quantum technologies through the proposed framework. This research focused on measuring prediction signals and symptom severity levels related to cardiac conditions in real-time. These measurements are expected to benefit patients, medical surgeons, and healthcare service providers by supporting more accurate monitoring and decision-making.
Compared with existing AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents, the proposed research framework is expected to provide greater benefits. The integration of AI and quantum technologies can improve the speed of remote measurements when wearable continuous monitoring devices are used, even across distant or remote locations.
Using quantum theory and principles, many risks during healthcare activities can be detected when multiple quantum sensors are deployed to measure processing accuracy. As shown in Figure 6, processing accuracy can be improved when the proposed technique is applied to complex healthcare monitoring scenarios. Additionally, AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents were incorporated in Figure 6 to maintain high healthcare quality while mitigating cybersecurity risks originating from multiple sources, including system biases.
Processing performance depends on multiple stages of healthcare activities, as each stage involves various monitoring, communication devices, and sensors. Even when robotic systems are deployed instead of human operators, processing-related risks must be considered to maintain and improve overall healthcare quality.
It aims to achieve several objectives, including advancing the essential science necessary to comprehend and formulate foundational AI and quantum principles for the design and architecture of such systems, as well as implementing these principles in particular practical applications. The proposal approach may enhance predictive metrics beyond the existing features utilized in conventional proactive systems. The operational capabilities of essential predictive scenarios utilizing AI-driven quantum preemptive systems and wearable continuous monitoring devices for autonomous healthcare services can be expanded. AI-driven quantum technologies, including quantum sensors, can be combined with various systems utilized by individuals with physical disabilities.

4.2. Cybersecurity Resilience Against the Energy Efficiency (EE)

Energy efficiency (EE) resilience enables organizations to maintain their daily operations through proactive prevention and detection strategies. Figure 7 presents the percentage of improvement that impacts the quality of healthcare and cardiac care. Quantum techniques can be utilized to measure neuron energy and neural activity, which may influence human behavior and AI-related biases. Both energy efficiency and cybersecurity resilience can be enhanced when the proposed framework is implemented in the healthcare sector.
According to the proposed framework, cybersecurity (CS) resilience improves as energy efficiency increases across different methods, and it becomes stable when energy efficiency reaches 100%.

5. Discussion and Analysis

According to the theoretical results, sensor and quantum data validation still rely on AI-based healthcare treatment agents responsible for decision-making processes. However, attacks generated using AI techniques can alter healthcare data obtained from sensors, which can reduce healthcare quality. To prevent false-positive diagnoses during healthcare processing, validation techniques based on quantum approaches should be applied. Quantum principles help ensure that AI decisions are based on untampered ground-truth data. To support further validation, independent verification using AI models is encouraged, allowing researchers to access suitable ground-truth models [63].
  • Superposition Principle: Artificial super intelligence (ASI) may generate novel scientific hypotheses or AI models for healthcare solutions, potentially improving healthcare quality.
  • Entangled Realities: ASI reasoning may represent complex, interconnected logical processes that help understand complex healthcare conditions, including brain-related disorders.
The results indicate that maintaining high-quality healthcare depends on managing risks associated with AI and modern technologies such as quantum sensors. Many risks emerge from biases introduced during different stages of AI-based models. These biases can lead to inequitable healthcare outcomes, reduced trust, and ethical and legal challenges. The proposed model aims to identify biases that create risks during healthcare services involving AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents and quantum sensors. Since healthcare services depend on disease type and long-term illness conditions, addressing bias while balancing fairness and performance remains essential and is considered within the proposed model.
Integration of AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents in healthcare provides significant advancements but also introduces risks such as misdiagnosis and inequitable outcomes caused by biased algorithms. AI systems often rely on non-representative datasets, leading to biased decision-making. For example, Obermeyer highlighted that a healthcare algorithm disproportionately favored White patients over Black patients because healthcare cost was used as a proxy for healthcare needs, indirectly embedding racial bias in predictions [35].
Organ sensors are used to measure internal biological data, enabling healthcare providers to determine appropriate treatment and medication. These sensors are essential for advancing healthcare and future medicine by supporting rapid decision-making and improving disease understanding.
As healthcare services increasingly rely on multiple communication links and emerging technologies such as IQN, the frequency and diversity of cyberattacks targeting healthcare systems are expected to increase.

5.1. Traditional AI and Proposed Models

Table 5 presents a comparison between human-based approaches, traditional AI methods, and the proposed model, highlighting healthcare feature support for long-term diseases and chronic illnesses.
The results of the proposed work in digital healthcare systems are expected to provide the following utilization and impact:
  • Theoretical and Technical Foundations: The proposed framework establishes theoretical and technical foundations for improving cardiac-related measurements. This framework is expected to encourage researchers to explore AI-based quantum technologies in other specialized cardiac healthcare applications within digital health.
  • Practical Monitoring Tools: The development of practical AI-based quantum monitoring tools supports the implementation of the proposed framework by applying validated AI algorithms and quantum communication protocols.
  • Protocol Extensions: Extensions of existing software-based protocols related to cardiac healthcare, including traditional routing and quantum routing protocols, can support dynamically changing time response requirements alongside varying risk and security levels. These capabilities are particularly important in critical and harsh digital healthcare environments and can improve the efficiency of proactive healthcare systems.
Regarding the AI-based quantum proactive system in digital health, selected technical innovations and research outcomes will be disseminated through academic publications (journals and conferences), industry events, trade shows, trade magazines, specialized project workshops, and contributions to relevant standardization bodies. The potential for patent filing based on specific project outcomes will also be explored.
The analysis and discussion of the results highlight processing-related risks when different technologies are deployed across healthcare activities. At the same time, the proposed approach supports maintaining appropriate healthcare quality levels under varying operational conditions.

5.2. Quality in Healthcare Management

Improving healthcare quality requires effective risk minimization using both existing and proposed techniques. In the proposed model, we demonstrate that consistent levels of data can be monitored throughout the healthcare processing stages. Based on the observed data from different technologies, minimum risk levels were identified, as technical biases and errors were optimized through the integration of AI and quantum technologies.
Quantum and AI technologies can significantly contribute to the reduction in non-communicable diseases (NCDs) over time. The following evidence-based strategies aim to reduce the NCD rate by 50% or more by 2035.
The theoretical model proposed in this research may stimulate further healthcare research activities worldwide. Its impact is particularly strong in addressing NCDs through improvements in healthcare quality, including early detection, prevention, personalized treatment, and drug discovery.
The integration of AI agents, quantum sensors, and explainable AI (XAI) enhances both medical and administrative healthcare applications. These technologies improve quality assurance and support systematic approaches in healthcare management. To promote global standardization in healthcare, the adoption of a recommended and unified healthcare framework is essential.

6. Challenges

In future healthcare sectors, emerging quantum technologies, including quantum sensing and quantum imaging, are expected to enhance diagnostic accuracy and detection capabilities under various conditions. Quantum approaches may allow healthcare providers to scan and detect multiple symptoms simultaneously. However, the use of quantum sensors across different healthcare applications may present challenges for users who lack expertise in quantum technologies. Optical sensing technologies, including quantum dot sensors, are rapidly advancing. The integration of quantum sensing with AI is creating new opportunities in autonomous healthcare systems, complex nerve system diagnostics, and miniaturized monitoring devices.
Meeting user requirements remains a future challenge, particularly as laser-based sensors continue to evolve through advancements in quantum technology, material science, and computational algorithms.
  • Quantum XAI (QXAI) for healthcare: Ethical privacy, security, bias in quantum AI models, and trust in AI-based healthcare systems remain major challenges. Mental healthcare solutions require higher transparency to identify biases and errors through glass-box approaches rather than black-box models. While conventional XAI can support some healthcare monitoring tasks, QXAI is expected to improve future healthcare system security, robustness, and quality.
  • QXAI in quantum key distribution (QKD): QKD provides ultra-secure data encryption for healthcare applications. Based on quantum mechanical principles, QKD enables secure communication for healthcare service providers across various environments and operational conditions.
  • Quantum decoherence: Quantum decoherence represents the difficulty of maintaining stable quantum states when high-sensitivity quantum sensors are deployed in complex healthcare environments. When quantum systems lose their quantum properties, wearable quantum sensors may become less effective, potentially increasing security risks under environmental disturbances.
Quantum technologies provide promising solutions for biomedical sensing challenges. Although quantum computing and quantum sensing are different technologies, each provides specific advantages and challenges depending on healthcare application requirements. Researchers aim to use quantum computing to enhance AI capabilities while applying AI techniques to overcome quantum computing limitations.
Quantum-driven healthcare innovations also introduce regulatory challenges. Although quantum computing promises exponential performance improvements for applications such as molecular simulation, genomics, and precision medicine, real-world adoption remains limited. Major healthcare applications are emerging in drug discovery, imaging, and disease modeling, supported by collaborations between technology companies and research institutions. However, challenges including hardware instability, high costs, talent shortages, and regulatory readiness must be addressed before large-scale hospital deployment.

6.1. Quantum Computing in Healthcare Beyond 2030

Healthcare increasingly relies on connected medical devices integrated with smart homes and healthcare hubs. Quantum processors are expected to solve complex healthcare problems based on patient medical conditions. Compared to classical computing, AI-based models integrated with quantum processors are expected to enhance healthcare services beyond 2030:
  • Drug usage: Time management, drug scheduling, and dosage frequency can be optimized using quantum sorting algorithms in advanced healthcare services.
  • Disease modeling: Real-time disease modeling is a major challenge, especially for immune-related conditions. Quantum computing is expected to improve processing speed for faster healthcare decision-making.

6.2. Organs’ Sensation Risks and Quantum Sensors

Risks may occur when organ sensors are used to monitor biological organ functions under varying environmental conditions. These risks must be detected using quantum sensors, especially for patients relying on artificial organs and implantable monitoring devices. Organ-on-a-Chip (OoC) sensors are micro-scale devices integrated into microfluidic chips that replicate organ behavior to study disease, test drug toxicity, and model human physiology. Patients with organ disorders require continuous monitoring using OoC technologies. The integration of quantum and AI technologies introduces new research opportunities in developing future healthcare monitoring devices and systems.

6.3. Mental Healthcare with Neuron Communication

Mental healthcare remains a major global challenge due to technological, behavioral, and lifestyle factors. Brain communication and neural function monitoring are essential components of mental healthcare. Quantum communication and energy-related biological processes must be carefully managed. Neurons communicate through electrical and chemical signaling mechanisms. When neural activity and associated quantum-level biological processes are disrupted, mental health conditions may worsen.

6.4. AI-Based Models and Their Applications with Possible Challenges

AI algorithms are optimized to improve prediction accuracy while minimizing computational complexity. However, maintaining healthcare quality while managing system complexity will remain a major challenge as healthcare technologies continue to evolve.

7. Conclusions and Future Work

AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents for maintaining high-quality healthcare while mitigating cybersecurity risks demonstrate strong potential for next-generation digital health systems. Emerging technologies such as quantum sensors, quantum computing (QC), and advanced healthcare device deployment methods are expected to significantly enhance healthcare services, monitoring accuracy, and system resilience.
The integration of AI and quantum technologies can address major healthcare challenges, including medical diagnosis, predictive analytics, and healthcare administration. By combining intelligent data analytics with quantum-enabled processing and sensing, healthcare systems can improve service quality while reducing security risks, operational biases, and system vulnerabilities.
Healthcare systems generate massive volumes of heterogeneous medical data across multiple disease domains. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) integrated with AI-based diagnostic agents and AI-based healthcare treatment agents provides powerful capabilities for discovering hidden patterns, improving predictive modeling, and enabling real-time healthcare decision support.
The development of secure healthcare information infrastructures using QML and Integrated Quantum Networks (IQNs) represents an important emerging research direction. Quantum computing can accelerate drug discovery, optimize molecular simulations, and improve treatment safety, supporting faster and more reliable therapeutic development.
Additionally, QC combined with Machine Learning can enhance predictive disease diagnosis, optimize drug distribution systems, and improve healthcare resource management. These capabilities will support personalized medicine, early disease detection, and improved patient outcomes.
Future work should focus on advancing secure AI–quantum healthcare architectures, addressing evolving cybersecurity threats, and improving scalability and real-world deployment. Adaptive AI–quantum healthcare systems will enable personalized treatment strategies and proactive monitoring, particularly for chronic and long-term disease management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.A. and V.T.; data curation, V.T.; funding acquisition, A.M.A.; investigation, A.M.A. and V.T.; methodology, V.T.; resources, A.M.A. and V.T.; supervision, A.M.A.; validation, A.M.A. and V.T.; writing—original draft, A.M.A. and V.T.; writing—review and editing, A.M.A. and V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, grant number IPP: 597-611-2025.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical and financial support provided by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
APTAdvanced Persistent Threat
AQTAdaptive Quantum Techniques
ASIArtificial Super Intelligence
ATAssistive Technology
CPSCyber-Physical Systems
DLDeep Learning
DoSDenial-of-Service
EABOAEnhanced Adaptive Butterfly Optimization Algorithm
EEEnergy Efficiency
EHRElectronic Health Record
EoTEdge of Things
GAGrover’s Algorithm
IDSIntrusion Detection System
IoMTInternet of Medical Things
IoTInternet of Things
IQNsIntegrated Quantum Networks
MDRMedical Device Regulation
MLMachine Learning
NCDnon-communicable disease
OoCOrgan-on-a-Chip
QAOAQuantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
QCQuantum Computing
QCNNQuantum Convolutional Neural Network
QKDQuantum Key Distribution
QMLQuantum Machine Learning
QPEQuantum Phase Estimation
QRNNQuantum Recurrent Neural Network
QubitsQuantum Bits
QXAIQuantum XAI
SQUIDSuperconducting Quantum Interference Device
VoTVelocity of Thought
VQEVariational Quantum Eigensolver
XAIExplainable AI

References

  1. Islam, S.M.R.; Kwak, D.; Kabir, M.H.; Hossain, M.; Kwak, K.-S. The internet of things for health care: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 2015, 3, 678–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shickel, B.; Tighe, P.J.; Bihorac, A.; Rashidi, P. Deep EHR: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques for electronic health record (EHR) analysis. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2017, 22, 1589–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haleem, A.; Javaid, M.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens. Int. 2021, 2, 100117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eric, T. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again; Basic Books: Hachette UK; London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Das, A.K.; Wazid, M.; Kumar, N.; Khan, M.K.; Choo, K.-K.R.; Park, Y. Design of secure and lightweight authentication protocol for wearable devices environment. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2017, 22, 1310–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhosale, K.S.; Nenova, M.; Iliev, G. A study of cyber attacks: In the healthcare sector. In 2021 Sixth Junior Conference on Lighting (Lighting); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Algarni, A.M.; Thayananthan, V. Digital Health: The Cybersecurity for AI-based healthcare communication. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 5858–5870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kruse, C.S.; Frederick, B.; Jacobson, T.; Monticone, D.K. Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technol. Health Care 2017, 25, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McLeod, A.; Dolezel, D. Cyber-analytics: Modeling factors associated with healthcare data breaches. Decis. Support Syst. 2018, 108, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Conti, M.; Dehghantanha, A.; Franke, K.; Watson, S. Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 78, 544–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. IBM Security. Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025, the AI Oversight Gap; IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shojaei, P.; Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E.; Chow, Y.-W. Security and privacy of technologies in health information systems: A systematic literature review. Computers 2024, 13, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khraisat, A.; Gondal, I.; Vamplew, P.; Kamruzzaman, J. Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges. Cybersecurity 2019, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Axelsson, S. The base-rate fallacy and the difficulty of intrusion detection. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. (TISSEC) 2000, 3, 186–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Merlano, C. Enhancing cyber security through artificial intelligence and machine learning: A literature review. J. Cybersecur. 2024, 6, 89–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xin, Y.; Kong, L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Gao, M.; Hou, H.; Wang, C. Machine learning and deep learning methods for cybersecurity. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 35365–35381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buczak, A.L.; Guven, E. A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015, 18, 1153–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Shim, M.; Choi, E. CNN-based network intrusion detection against denial-of-service attacks. Electronics 2020, 9, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chalapathy, R.; Khoa, N.L.D.; Chawla, S. Robust deep learning methods for anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 3507–3508. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pise, A.A.; Almuzaini, K.K.; Ahanger, T.A.; Farouk, A.; Pant, K.; Pareek, P.K.; Nuagah, S.J. Enabling artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) healthcare architectures and listing security issues. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 8421434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arefin, S.; Simcox, M. AI-Driven Solutions for Safeguarding Healthcare Data: Innovations in Cybersecurity. Int. Bus. Res. 2024, 17, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sendelj, R.; Ognjanovic, I. Cybersecurity challenges in healthcare. In Achievements, Milestones and Challenges in Biomedical and Health Informatics; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Athens, Greece, 2022; pp. 190–202. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chintala, S. Data privacy and security challenges in AI-driven healthcare systems in India. J. Data Acquis. Process. 2022, 37, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Teng, C.; Kumar, S.; Li, X.; Min, R. Wearable cardiorespiratory sensor for real-time monitoring with smartphone integration. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2023, 73, 7000710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anbazhagu, U.V.; Priyadharshini, K.; Deepajothi, S.; Haripriya, M.P.; Banu, E.A. Quantum Computing in Healthcare Using AI-Driven Medical Technologies. In Modern SuperHyperSoft Computing Trends in Science and Technology; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 367–398. [Google Scholar]
  26. Baral, B.; Roy, T.D. Integrating Quantum Principles with Classical Transfer Learning Approaches for Pneumonia Detection from Chest Radiographs. In 2024 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems (ICSES); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1042–1049. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tripathi, A.; Rathore, R. AI in Disease Surveillance—An Overview of How AI Can Be Used in Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Detection in Real-World Scenarios. In AI in Disease Detection: Advancements and Applications; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 337–359. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chehimi, M.; Elhattab, M.; Saad, W.; Vardoyan, G.; Panigrahy, N.K.; Assi, C.; Towsley, D. Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted entanglement distribution in fso quantum networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2025, 24, 3132–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gobinath, A.; Rajeswari, P.; Kumar, S.N.; Anandan, M. Quantum Robotics in Health Care: Innovations and Applications. In The Quantum Evolution; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2025; pp. 211–225. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yadavalli, N.; Ponnaluri, V.D.N.S.; Allagadda, K.K.R.; Vysyaraju, P.R.; Srinivas, P.V.V.S.; Rama Krishna Rao, T.K. Quantum Networks-Driven Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Testicular Cancer Risk Factors Advancing Precision Medicine. In AI and Quantum Network Applications in Business and Medicine; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 157–172. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bommala, H.; Raja, J.; Latha, P.; Thilagam, T.; Valarmathi, P.; Sudhakar, M. Blockchain for Pharmaceutical Data Management and Quantum Computing Innovations. In AI-Powered Advances in Pharmacology; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 201–234. [Google Scholar]
  32. Prakash, K.A.; Gowda, D.; Kottala, S.Y.; Dudi, B.; Mohammed, S.A. Quantum Cryptography and Healthcare Security: Safeguarding Patient Data in Medical Systems. In Advancing Cyber Security Through Quantum Cryptography; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 197–230. [Google Scholar]
  33. Prajapat, S.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, P. Quantum image encryption protocol for secure communication in healthcare networks. Clust. Comput. 2025, 28, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ranjith, J.; Mahantesh, K.; Tilak Babu, S.B.G.; Ashok Kumar, N.; Rama Prasad, M.V.; Hariram, V. Optimising AI Network Resource Allocation in Healthcare with Quantum-Inspired Techniques. In AI and Quantum Network Applications in Business and Medicine; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 101–118. [Google Scholar]
  35. Flöther, F.F. Early quantum computing applications on the path towards precision medicine. In Implementation of Personalized Precision Medicine; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 83–96. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ishikawa, K.; Ohmichi, H.; Umesato, Y.; Terasaki, H.; Tsukuma, H.; Iwata, N.; Tanaka, T.; Kawamura, A.; Sakata, K.; Sainohara, T.; et al. The guideline of the personal health data structure to secure safety healthcare: The balance between use and protection to satisfy the patients’ needs. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  37. Rostami, M.; Burleson, W.; Koushanfar, F.; Juels, A. Balancing security and utility in medical devices? In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Design Automation Conference; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pistorius, C. Developments in emerging digital health technologies. DeltaHedron Innov. Insight 2017, 1, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramasamy, L.K.; Khan, F.; Shah, M.; Prasad, B.V.V.S.; Iwendi, C.; Biamba, C. Secure smart wearable computing through artificial intelligence-enabled internet of things and cyber-physical systems for health monitoring. Sensors 2022, 22, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klonoff, A.N.; Lee, W.-A.; Xu, N.Y.; Nguyen, K.T.; DuBord, A.; Kerr, D. Six digital health technologies that will transform diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2023, 17, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tan, T.F.; Thirunavukarasu, A.J.; Jin, L.; Lim, J.; Poh, S.; Teo, Z.L.; Ang, M.; Chan, R.V.P.; Ong, J.; Turner, A.; et al. Artificial intelligence and digital health in global eye health: Opportunities and challenges. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e1432–e1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kelly, B.S.; Quinn, C.; Belton, N.; Lawlor, A.; Killeen, R.P.; Burrell, J. Cybersecurity considerations for radiology departments involved with artificial intelligence. Eur. Radiol. 2023, 33, 8833–8841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaisakhkrishnan, K.; Ashok, G.; Mishra, P.; Kumar, T.G. Guarding Digital Health: Deep learning for attack detection in Medical IoT. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, 235, 2498–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gupta, L.; Salman, T.; Ghubaish, A.; Unal, D.; Al-Ali, A.K.; Jain, R. Cybersecurity of multi-cloud healthcare systems: A hierarchical deep learning approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022, 118, 108439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ikharo, B.; Obiagwu, A.; Obasi, C.; Hussein, S.U.; Akah, P. Security for internet-of-things enabled e-health using blockchain and artificial intelligence: A novel integration framework. In 2021 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering and Applied Science (ICMEAS); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alshehri, M. Blockchain-assisted cyber security in medical things using artificial intelligence. Electron. Res. Arch. 2023, 31, 708–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ameen, A.H.; Mohammed, M.A.; Rashid, A.N. Dimensions of artificial intelligence techniques, blockchain, and cyber security in the Internet of medical things: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. J. Intell. Syst. 2023, 32, 20220267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yadulla, A.R.; Yenugula, M.; Kasula, V.K.; Konda, B.; Thumma, B.Y.R. Comprehensive Analysis of IoT Security: Threats, Detection Methods, and Defense Strategies. J. Internet Things 2025, 7, 19–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miriam, H.; Doreen, D.; Robin, C.R.R. Secured Cyber Security Algorithm for Healthcare System Using Blockchain Technology. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2023, 35, 1889–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chakraborty, C.; Nagarajan, S.M.; Devarajan, G.G.; Ramana, T.V.; Mohanty, R. Intelligent AI-based healthcare cyber security system using multi-source transfer learning method. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Algarni, A.M.; Thayananthan, V. Cybersecurity for Analyzing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Assistive Technology and Systems in Digital Health. Systems 2025, 13, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ksibi, S.; Jaidi, F.; Bouhoula, A. A comprehensive study of security and cyber-security risk management within e-Health systems: Synthesis, analysis and a novel quantified approach. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2023, 28, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thomasian, N.M.; Adashi, E.Y. Cybersecurity in the internet of medical things. Health Policy Technol. 2021, 10, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jalali, M.S.; Razak, S.; Gordon, W.; Perakslis, E.; Madnick, S. Health care and cybersecurity: Bibliometric analysis of the literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e12644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Biasin, E.; Kamenjašević, E.; Ludvigsen, K.R. Cybersecurity of AI medical devices: Risks, legislation, and challenges. In Research Handbook on Health, AI and the Law; Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.: Cheltenham, UK, 2024; pp. 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bertl, M. News analysis for the detection of cyber security issues in digital healthcare: A text mining approach to uncover actors, attack methods and technologies for cyber defense. Young Inf. Sci. 2019, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  57. Musbahi, O.; Syed, L.; Le Feuvre, P.; Cobb, J.; Jones, G. Public patient views of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A nominal group technique study. Digit. Health 2021, 7, 20552076211063682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Arafa, A.; Sheerah, H.A.; Alsalamah, S. Emerging digital technologies in healthcare with a spotlight on cybersecurity: A narrative review. Information 2023, 14, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Radanliev, P.; De Roure, D. Advancing the cybersecurity of the healthcare system with self-optimising and self-adaptative artificial intelligence (part 2). Health Technol. 2022, 12, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Thayananthan, V. Analysis of Quantum Computing and Trellis Coding based on PUM Codes. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2021, 30, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Van Chien, T.; Duc, B.T.; Tung, N.X.; Nguyen, V.D.; Khalid, W.; Chatzinotas, S.; Hanzo, L. Single-and Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization for Next-Generation Networks in the Generative AI and Quantum Computing Era. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2601.02175. [Google Scholar]
  62. Dontu, S.; Vallabhaneni, R.; Addula, S.R.; Pareek, P.K.; Hussein, R.R. Enhanced adaptive butterfly optimizer based feature selection for protecting the data in industry based WSN. In 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Algorithms for Computational Intelligence Systems (IACIS); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  63. Qian, Y.; Lin, Y.-C.; Hejazi, S.; Clarke, K.; Watson, K.; Chen, X.; Kumbella, N.-M.; Quimbo, J.; Dinizulu, A.; Henin, S.; et al. Quantum Sensing MRI for Noninvasive Detection of Neuronal Electrical Activity in Human Brains. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2601.16423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The health organization ecosystem.
Figure 1. The health organization ecosystem.
Systems 14 00315 g001
Figure 2. Functional components of a wearable assistive system designed for educational settings. Reprinted from Ref. [51].
Figure 2. Functional components of a wearable assistive system designed for educational settings. Reprinted from Ref. [51].
Systems 14 00315 g002
Figure 3. The representation of qubits for quantum computing. Reprinted from Ref. [60].
Figure 3. The representation of qubits for quantum computing. Reprinted from Ref. [60].
Systems 14 00315 g003
Figure 4. The AI-based proposed model for maintaining good healthcare against cybersecurity risks.
Figure 4. The AI-based proposed model for maintaining good healthcare against cybersecurity risks.
Systems 14 00315 g004
Figure 5. Quantum computing and complexity in healthcare performance.
Figure 5. Quantum computing and complexity in healthcare performance.
Systems 14 00315 g005
Figure 6. Healthcare quality against cybersecurity risks.
Figure 6. Healthcare quality against cybersecurity risks.
Systems 14 00315 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of the proposed model with the existing mode.
Figure 7. Comparison of the proposed model with the existing mode.
Systems 14 00315 g007
Table 1. All identified quantum sensing technologies.
Table 1. All identified quantum sensing technologies.
Name of
Sensing Technology
Technology
Classification
Description
Aspirin-based carbon dotQuantum dotsAll connections must be active and available, accessible in all environmental conditions
Nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dotQuantum dotsAuthorized hubs and systems should be used to set the secure communication links on time
Quantum dot–DNA bioconjugateQuantum dotsAI-based healthcare data and DNA must be validated for robustness of cybersecurity
Wearable pulse oximeterQuantum dotsHealthcare wearable devices are set for pulse monitoring
Magnetic-field quantum sensorsQuantum sensingSensors in healthcare enhance the sensing of each magnetic field or wave related to health issues
Nanodiamond quantum sensingQuantum sensingNanotechnology in healthcare supports the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases
Quantum 3D imagingQuantum imagingQuantum-based healthcare depends on quantum imaging for validating the identification
Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)Quantum imagingAI-based healthcare devices, including SQUID, are used to improve the accuracy of healthcare solutions
NVision PolarizerQuantum resonanceQuantum energy in neurons supports the treatment of brain function, which affects healthcare
Table 2. Comparative analysis of AI and cybersecurity approaches in healthcare.
Table 2. Comparative analysis of AI and cybersecurity approaches in healthcare.
Ref.Focused ResearchCritical AnalysisComments
[38]Foundational analysis of interconnected healthcare trajectories.Correctly predicted data-intensive shifts but lacks specific cybersecurity mechanisms for high-velocity data.Justifies the need for high-performance architectural designs in healthcare.
[39,53]AI-enabled IoT/CPS and IoMT cybersecurity challenges.Robust in connectivity; however, lacks proactive risk prediction and adaptive defense modeling for evolving threats.Motivated the inclusion of AI-based diagnostic agents for adaptive intrusion detection.
[40,41]AI-driven clinical transformation in diabetes and global eye health.Primary focus is on clinical outcomes; limited emphasis on cybersecurity robustness or infrastructure protection.Highlighted the necessity of integrating “security-by-design” within AI clinical applications.
[42,55]Regulatory considerations and legal risks of AI medical devices.Strong focus on policy and risk; however, lacks implementation-level technical cybersecurity frameworks.Supports the inclusion of regulatory-aware governance within the AI–quantum framework.
[43,50]Deep learning and transfer learning for IoMT attack detection.High detection accuracy but remains largely reactive; lacks integration with holistic healthcare infrastructures.Reinforced the need for multi-layered, proactive threat intelligence and diagnostic agents.
[45,46,47,48,49]Blockchain–AI integration for healthcare data integrity.Excellent decentralized integrity; however, scalability and latency overhead remain significant practical barriers.Motivated a hybrid layer using optimization to reduce computational overhead.
[51]Security analysis of AI-based assistive technologies (AT).Identifies critical AT vulnerabilities but lacks predictive, self-healing security modeling.Encouraged the inclusion of specialized protection for assistive healthcare devices.
[54,56]Bibliometric and text-mining analysis of cybersecurity trends.Provides macro-level landscape insights; lacks a functional implementation or technical framework.Validated identified research gaps and justified the proposed unified AI–quantum model.
[57]Public perception and ethics of AI in healthcare.Addresses trust and ethical concerns but does not explore technical cybersecurity depth or resilience.Reinforced the importance of transparency and bias mitigation in healthcare treatment agents.
[58,59]Emerging technologies and self-adaptive AI for cybersecurity.Introduces self-optimization but lacks integration with quantum sensing or unified architectural governance.Directly inspired our proactive, adaptive AI–quantum integrated architecture.
Table 3. Good healthcare requirements.
Table 3. Good healthcare requirements.
Healthcare QualityQuantum
Dots
Quantum
Sensing
Quantum
Imaging
Quantum
Resonance
Diagnostic accuracy (>90%)91909295
Reliability of diagnosing tools (>99%)99.499.699.799.9
Security, risks and privacy
(>95%)
99979698.2
Duration of the infection rate (<10 m/s)5 ms2 ms3 ms1 ms
Healthcare risk values (<1%)2010149
Monitoring time in healthcare (<1 ms)0.10.50.70.3
Table 4. Example of statistical validation.
Table 4. Example of statistical validation.
Biometrics Based on ThoughtsAssume That Possible Used Neuron in a Specific BehaviorBias Based on the Observed BiometricsScientific Accuracy with KPIs
Gait (hand or leg veins)10,000HighFastest thought
Voice (levels of sound)500LowVery slow thought
Face (eye and iris movement)1000MediumAverage speed of thought
Table 5. Comparison of human approach, traditional AI, and proposed model.
Table 5. Comparison of human approach, traditional AI, and proposed model.
Features in HealthcareHuman (Clinician)Traditional AI DeploymentProposed Model
Accessible primary and personalized healthcare functionsPersonalized patient care, complex health conditionsAI enables personalized treatment plans by analyzing patient data with reasonable security and quality according to the medical history, genetics, and lifestyle factorsA combination of AI and quantum principles provides efficient and secure accessibility when personalized data are considered
Context awareness and healthcare assistantsPatients’ history with health administrative tasksThe patients’ administrative burdens and context awareness are simplified with minimized errors, allowing them to focus more on patient careAI algorithms allow researchers to validate the quantum sensor data of patients’ private history
Decision-making for maintaining good health against security risksExperience of good healthcare in different conditionsAlthough decision-making depends on the accuracy of AI algorithms, the quality of the data is important because inaccurate or biased data can result in incorrect predictions, which can have serious consequences in a healthcare settingThe proposed approach in this model provides maximum security in healthcare, where quantum sensors reduce biases in decision-making
Administrative issues of healthcare servicesCost analysis against the security risksAI can streamline administrative issues, reduce healthcare errors, and improve the quality of services, which facilitates preventive care of all types of long-term diseases and illnessesAI must ensure security risks in healthcare services, but some complex services involved with biases need to be removed. Here, quantum techniques improve the healthcare quality in all services
Users’ language and translationEnabling healthcare with multiple usersAI algorithms and AI-based translation tools support patients who are struggling to understand the general healthcare procedures. AI personal agents or assistants may be used for translating data when AI-based agents also enhance the translation facilitiesAI-based agents enhance the quantum procedures that are used in all types of programming translations, which include the users’ languages
Role of healthcare with wearable devicesManual settings with wearable health technologiesAI algorithms allow wearable devices to check the calibration of the devices incorporated with the sensors and devices connected to the wearable devicesWith enhanced quantum precision medicine to wearable health technologies and quantum algorithms, the future of IQN in healthcare is poised for significant progress
Intelligent approach of digital healthcare and surgerySetting automation approaches in healthcare hubs and surgeryAlthough the AI algorithms and robotic systems improve the quality of healthcare, setting automation and real-time surgical navigation become more affordable and accessible in healthcare facilities worldwideThese quantum techniques and developments will further reduce recovery times, minimize surgical risks, and improve overall patient care and privacy issues
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Algarni, A.M.; Thayananthan, V. AI-Based Model for Maintaining Good Healthcare Quality Against Cybersecurity Risks. Systems 2026, 14, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030315

AMA Style

Algarni AM, Thayananthan V. AI-Based Model for Maintaining Good Healthcare Quality Against Cybersecurity Risks. Systems. 2026; 14(3):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Algarni, Abdullah M., and Vijey Thayananthan. 2026. "AI-Based Model for Maintaining Good Healthcare Quality Against Cybersecurity Risks" Systems 14, no. 3: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030315

APA Style

Algarni, A. M., & Thayananthan, V. (2026). AI-Based Model for Maintaining Good Healthcare Quality Against Cybersecurity Risks. Systems, 14(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop