E-Commerce Revolution: How the Pandemic Reshaped the US Consumer Shopping Habits: A PACF and ARIMA Approach
Abstract
1. Introduction
- How did US consumer shopping habits evolve across pre-, during, and post-COVID-19 periods, as revealed by time series analyses of retail trade sales?
- How do PACF and ARIMA models capture seasonality, stationarity, and lagged correlations in e-commerce categories, and what insights do they provide for forecasting future trends?
- Are there statistically significant differences in e-commerce sales between pandemic phases, as identified through inferential tests, and how do these differences vary across retail categories and subcategories?
- From a theoretical standpoint, our research demonstrates how and in what direction the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped US consumer shopping habits, and therefore, all commerce theory must be rewritten according to the new trends and behaviors.
- From a practical perspective, based on secondary data, quarterly registrations, about traditional and e-commerce in the US by applying complex statistical and econometrical methods, we demonstrate that the PACF, ARIMA model (combined with other specific methods as inferential statistics, regression model, etc.) and some specific graphical representations could particularly emphasize the changing behavior over time for a different type of commerce under the influence of particular time and conditions.
2. Literature Review
2.1. E-Commerce of Furniture and Home Furnishings
2.2. E-Commerce of Electronics and Appliances
2.3. E-Commerce of Building Materials and Garden Equipment
2.4. E-Commerce of Clothing and Clothing Accessories
2.5. E-Commerce of General Merchandise
2.6. E-Commerce of Food and Beverages
2.7. E-Commerce of Health and Personal Care
2.8. E-Commerce of Sporting Goods, Musical Instruments, and Books
2.9. E-Commerce of Miscellaneous Goods and Gasoline Stations
3. Materials and Methods
- Total retail trade (TRT);
- Motor vehicle and parts (MVP);
- Furniture, building materials, and electronics (FBME);
- Clothing and general merchandise (CGM);
- All other (AO);
- Nonstore retailers (NSR).
- FBME:
- ○
- Furniture and home furnishings (FHF);
- ○
- Electronics and appliances (EA);
- ○
- Building materials, garden equipment, and supplies (BMGES);
- CGM:
- ○
- Clothing and clothing accessories (CCA);
- ○
- General merchandise (GM);
- AO:
- ○
- Food and beverage (FB);
- ○
- Health and personal care (HPC);
- ○
- Sporting goods, hobbies, musical instruments, and books (SGHMIB);
- ○
- Miscellaneous including gasoline stations (MGS).
- PACF charts were employed to determine whether the data from the time series are stationary or not and to formally check for unit roots. The SPSS software does not offer the possibility of directly applying the Dickey–Fuller test, the formal test for establishing the presence and nature of stationarity. However, the PACF is sufficient to determine the nature and presence of non-stationarity. By applying PACF, the standard errors are calculated too. Since data is quarterly, we opted for multiple quarter-type periods (more precisely 16 periods) as the maximum number of lags (9 quarters for pre-pandemic and 7 quarters for during the pandemic and we want to demonstrate that the buying behavior for the post-pandemic is correlated with the e-commerce buying behaviors during the pandemic).
- For non-stationary time series, a transformation of the data based on a differentiating correction was applied (as opposed to a log transformation). For the research data, we opted for differencing, as it proved more effective than the log format in SPSS, because the log scale flattens out the more pronounced patterns. The research data show some seasonality in sales for certain categories [95]. In addition, we use this transformation to build the ARIMA models.
- The Autocorrelations Function (ACF) charts were used to establish the ARIMA type of model for each type of commerce, namely (a) TSNSS and (b) TEC.
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of E-Commerce Evolution in Pre-, During, and -Post-COVID-19 Pandemic
4.2. Testing Similarities or Differences Among E-Commerce Sales in Pre-, During, and Post-Pandemic Periods
- For TRT, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1 and 5, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest a first-order differencing as the remedy. The first-lag partial autocorrelation and the 5th-lag autocorrelation are above the critical limit. The meaning of the first-lag and 5th-lag partial autocorrelations implies that the TRT at time “t” is correlated with its value at time “t−1” but also with time “t−5”.
- For the MVP, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lag 1, with the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that first-order differencing is the remedy.
- For FBME, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1, 2, 4 (at the limit), and 5, while all the other PACF coefficients fall between the horizontal lines, within a 95% confidence interval. These aspects also state the existence of non-stationarity for this time series and suggest first-order differencing as the remedy. The first-lag, the second-lag partial autocorrelation, and the 5th-lag autocorrelation are above the critical limit, the 4th being at the limit. The meaning of these lag values for partial auto-correlations implies that FBME at time “t” is correlated with its value at time “t−1” and time “t−2”, time “t−4”, and with time “t−5”.
- For CGM, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 4 and 5, while all the rest of the PACF coefficients fall between the horizontal lines. With a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest a 4th-order differencing as the remedy. The fourth-lag partial autocorrelation and the 5th-lag autocorrelation are above the critical limit. The meaningfulness of the 4th and 5th lags’ partial autocorrelations implies that the CGM at time “t” is correlated not only with its value at time “t−4” but also with time “t−5” for clothing and general merchandise.
- For AO, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1 and 5, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that first-order differencing is the remedy. The first-lag partial autocorrelation and the 5th-lag autocorrelation are above the critical limit. The meaningfulness of the first-lag and 5th-lag partial autocorrelations implies that AO sales at time “t” are correlated with its value at time “t−1” but also with time “t−5”.
- For NSR, the partial autocorrelation coefficients are statistically significant for lag 1, with the rest of the PACF coefficients lying between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also reveal the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest first-order differencing as the remedy.
- For TRT, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1 and 5, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also demonstrate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest a first-order differencing as the remedy. The first-lag partial autocorrelation and the 5th-lag autocorrelation are above the critical limit. The meaning of the first-lag and 5th-lag partial autocorrelations implies that the TRT at time “t” is correlated with its value at time “t−1” but also with time “t−5”.
- For the MVP, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lag 1, with the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest first-order differencing as the remedy.
- For FBME, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lag 1 and at the limit for lag 5; all the rest of the PACF coefficients are between the horizontal lines. With a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that first-order differencing is the remedy. The first lag is above the critical limit, and the 5th lag has an autocorrelation at the limit. The meaning of these lag values for partial auto-correlations implies that FBME at the time “t” is correlated with its value at the time “t−1”.
- For CGM, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1, 4, and 5 (at the limit), while all the other PACF coefficients fall between the horizontal lines, within a 95% confidence interval. These aspects also denote the existence of non-stationarity for this time series and reveal first-order differencing as the remedy. The first-lag, the fourth-lag partial auto-correlation, and the 5th-lag auto-correlation are above the critical limit. The meaningfulness of the 1st, 4th, and 5th lags’ partial autocorrelations implies that the CGM at time “t” is correlated with its value at time “t−1” and “t−4”, but also with time “t−5” for clothing and general merchandise.
- For AO, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant at lags 1 and 5 (at the limit), with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines, within a 95% confidence interval. These aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest first-order differencing as the remedy. The first-lag partial autocorrelation is above the critical limit, and the 5th-lag autocorrelation is at the limit. The meaning of the first-lag partial autocorrelations denotes that AO sales at time “t” are correlated with their value at time “t−1” but also with time “t−5”.
- For NSR, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1 and 5, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines of a 95% confidence interval. These aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that first-order differencing is the remedy.
- During the pandemic, compared with pre-pandemic, the biggest percentage increase goes to AO (195.3%), followed by FBME (189.2%), CGM (187.5%), TRT (169.5%), NSR (161.3%), and with the minimum for MVP with 140.9%;
- Post-pandemic, compared with during the pandemic, for all the types of e-commerce, the increase was registered with the biggest percent for NSR (120.8%), followed by TRT (114.8%), and the minimum for FBME (100.7%);
- Post-pandemic, compared with pre-pandemic time, the hierarchy is quite different from comparison during the pandemic with pre-pandemic, as follows: AO (208.9%), CGM (206.2%), NSR (195%), TRT (194.6%), FBME (190.4%), and the minimum increase for MVP with 156.5%.
- During the pandemic, compared with pre-pandemic and post-pandemic times, the highest increase was registered by FB (334%), followed by BMGES (229.7%), GM (215.8%), SGHMIB (178.6%), FHF (177.1%), HPS (161%), with the minimum for MGS with 130.1%.
- In the post-pandemic period, compared to during the pandemic, FHS, EA, and SGHMIB recorded declines.
- For FHF, BMGES, food FB, and MGS, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lag 1, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that first-order differencing is the remedy. The first lag is above the critical limit and the autocorrelation. The meaning of these lag values for partial auto-correlations implies that for these sub-types of e-commerce, at time “t” is correlated with its value at time “t−1”;
- For EA, all the PACF values are inside the critical limits with a 95% confidence interval;
- For CCA, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 4 and 5, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines. Within a 95% confidence interval, these aspects also indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series, suggesting that the fourth-order and fifth-order differencing are the remedies. The fourth-lag (positive) and fifth-lag (negative) are above the critical limit and autocorrelation. The meaning of these lag values for partial auto-correlations outlines that for CCA at time “t” is correlated with its value at time “t−4” and “t−5”;
- For GM and SGHMIB, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 1, 4, and 5; all the rest of the PACF coefficients fall between the horizontal lines with a 95% confidence interval. These aspects also indicate the presence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that fourth-order and fifth-order differencing are the remedies. The first-lag, fourth-lag (positive), and fifth-lag (negative) are above the critical limit and autocorrelation. The meaning of these lag values for partial auto-correlations implies that for GM and SGHMIB, at the time “t” is correlated with its value at the time “t−1”, “t−4”, and “t−5”;
- For HPC, the partial auto-correlation coefficients are statistically significant for lags 2 and 4, with all the rest of the PACF coefficients falling between the horizontal lines within a 95% confidence interval. These aspects indicate the existence of non-stationarity in this time series and suggest that the 4th-order and 5th-order differencing are the remedies. The second-lag and 4th-lag (positive) are above the critical limit and autocorrelation. The meaning of these lag values for partial auto-correlations implies that HPC at the time “t” is correlated with its value at the time “t−2” and “t−4”.
4.3. Testing the Seasonality of Consumer Buying Behavior Between Classical and E-Commerce Stores
- The time series without transformations (Figure 15a,c,e,g,I,k) and
- With transformations (Figure 15b,d,f,h,j,l));
- For difference (1) and seasonal difference (1, period 4) or (in the case of total retail trade) with transformations for difference (5) and seasonal difference (1, period 4) according to the PACF results from previous figures.
5. Discussion
- Pandemic boost. The pandemic dramatically boosted non-store retailer sales, reinforcing the importance of e-commerce;
- Lasting impact. Sales remain elevated post-pandemic, suggesting a lasting increase in online shopping demand;
- Fast adoption: The rapid shift to darker colors during the pandemic indicates that consumers quickly pivoted to online shopping.
6. Conclusions
- Data due to aggregated retail trade data, which can mask variations across different sectors, regions, or store types (e.g., physical stores vs. e-commerce), and the seasonally adjusted and external factors (e.g., economic shocks, pandemics) may still distort the results;
- Time framework limitations. The period analyzed may not be long enough to capture long-term trends or structural changes, which limits the robustness of the conclusions. Short-term fluctuations might dominate the results, making it hard to infer persistent patterns;
- Unobserved factors, such as market competition, consumer behavior, or global economic conditions, may also influence the results.
- The results of this study demonstrate that the COVID-19 pandemic had a profound and lasting impact on US consumer shopping behavior. Time series analyses revealed that e-commerce sales experienced a significant and rapid increase during the pandemic, with growth rates exceeding 150–200% in most categories compared to pre-pandemic levels. Importantly, post-pandemic sales did not return to pre-pandemic baselines but remained at elevated levels, confirming a structural shift in consumer preferences.
- PACF and ARIMA analyses highlighted clear patterns of seasonality and lagged correlations across different categories, indicating that consumer behaviors developed during the pandemic continue to shape current market dynamics. The ARIMA models provided robust evidence of persistence in e-commerce adoption, reinforcing the predictive value of these econometric tools for future retail forecasting.
- Inferential statistics (Kruskal–Wallis tests) confirmed statistically significant differences between pre-, during, and post-pandemic phases across all major retail categories and subcategories. Categories such as food and beverage, general merchandise, and non-store retailers recorded the strongest and most sustained growth, while furniture, electronics, and clothing displayed heterogeneous recovery patterns.
- Overall, the findings emphasize that the pandemic acted not merely as a temporary disruption but as a structural accelerator of digital commerce, fundamentally reshaping US retail trade and embedding e-commerce as a permanent consumer habit.
- To extend the analyzed time frame, namely for a long-term period by taking into consideration the economic recovery periods, changes in consumer habits, or technological adoption;
- To focus on the sectoral analysis to identify where changes are most significant;
- To apply other predictive models based on ML and use granular data to account for seasonality and market dynamics;
- To explore the role of e-commerce and digital transformation in retail trade growth and stability, especially in times of disruption
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ACF | Autocorrelation Function |
AI | Artificial intelligence |
AO | All other |
AR | Augmented reality |
ARIMA | Autoregressive integrated moving average |
B2C | Business-to-consumer |
BMGES | Building materials, garden equipment, and supplies |
CCA | Clothing and clothing accessories |
CGM | Clothing and general merchandise |
DL | Deep learning |
EA | Electronics and appliances |
eS | E-satisfaction |
eSQ | E-service quality |
EU | European Union |
EV | Electric vehicle |
eWOM | Electronic word-of-mouth |
FB | Food and beverage |
FBME | Furniture, building materials, and electronics |
FHF | Furniture and home furnishings |
GM | General merchandise |
HPC | Health and personal care |
IoT | Internet of Things |
MGS | Miscellaneous including gasoline stations |
ML | Machine learning |
MVP | Motor vehicle and parts |
NSR | Nonstore retailers |
PACF | Partial autocorrelation function |
SGHMIB | Sporting goods, hobbies, musical instruments, and books |
TEC | Total e-commerce |
TRT | Total retail trade |
TSNSS | Total store and non-store sales |
WR | Webrooming |
References
- Adebayo, T.S.; Awosusi, A.A.; Rjoub, H.; Panait, M.; Popescu, C. Asymmetric Impact of International Trade on Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions in MINT Nations. Energies 2021, 14, 6581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.M.; Gortoescu, I.A.; Tanase, M.R. Artificial Intelligence—Powered Video Content Generation Tools. Rom. J. Pet. Gas Technol. 2024, V (LXXVI), 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Santos, V.F.; Sabino, L.R.; Morais, G.M.; Gonçalves, C.A. E-Commerce: A Short History Follow-up on Possible Trends. Int. J. Bus. Adm. 2017, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rădulescu, I.G.; Dumbrăvescu, B.; The National and International Dimension of Electronic Commerce. Aspects of e-commerce Development in France and Romania. Pet. Gas Univ. Ploiești Bull. Econ. Sci. Ser. 2009, LXI, 19–35. Available online: https://upg-bulletin-se.ro/old_site/archive/2009-1/3.%20Radulescu_Dumbravescu.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Bhatti, A.; Akram, H.; Basit, H.M.; Khan, A.U.; Naqvi, S.M.R.; Bilal, M. E-commerce trends during COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Future Gener. Commun. Netw. 2020, 13, 1449–1452. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmed-Khan-67/publication/342736799_E-commerce_trends_during_COVID-19_Pandemic/links/5f04603c458515505091c291/E-commerce-trends-during-COVID-19-Pandemic.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Jones, K. The Pandemic Economy: What Are Shoppers Buying Online During COVID-19? Available online: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/shoppers-buying-online-ecommerce-COVID-19/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
- Redda, E.H. Initial impact assessment of COVID-19 on retailing: Changing consumer behaviour and retail trade sales. J. Contemp. Manag. 2021, 18, 22–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inoue, Y.; Hashimoto, M. Changes in consumer dynamics on general e-commerce platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study of the Japanese market. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panasenko, S.; Ramazanov, I.; Seifullaeva, M.; Stolyarova, A.; Mayorova, E.; Nikishin, A. Assessment of the current state of commodity circulation in the Russian Federation. Nexo Rev. Científica 2022, 35, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sijabat, E.A.S.; Hidayati, H.A. Corporate Resilience and Competitiveness Relying on System Digitalization Through Ambidextrous Innovation. J. Teknol. Dan Manaj. 2024, 22, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Gerea, A.E.; Bold, R.A. Innovative Project Management Tool with Azure Services. J. Electr. Eng. Electron. Control Comput. Sci. 2023, 9, 25–30. Available online: https://jeeeccs.net/index.php/journal/article/view/353/256. (accessed on 16 May 2025).
- Gu, S.; Ślusarczyk, B.; Hajizada, S.; Kovalyova, I.; Sakhbieva, A. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2263–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, H.B.; Sablani, S.; Gogate, P.; Annapure, U.; Casanova, F.; Nayik, G.A.; Alaskar, K.; Sarwar, N.; Raina, I.A.; Ramniwas, S.; et al. Factors governing consumers buying behavior concerning nutraceutical product. Food Sci. Amp; Nutr. 2023, 11, 4988–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Roldán, G.; Carrión-Bósquez, N.; García-Umaña, A.; Ortiz-Regalado, O.; Medina-Miranda, S.; Marchena-Chanduvi, R.; Llamo-Burga, M.; López-Pastén, I.; Veas González, I. Digital Social Influence and Its Impact on the Attitude of Organic Product Consumers. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Li, X.; Zhu, S.; Wang, M. Retail Service, Pricing, and Channel Selection Strategies for Fashion Products in a Two-Stage Decision Model. Mathematics 2025, 13, 2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Shen, T.; Chen, X. Seeing Is Believing: The Impact of AI Magic Mirror on Consumer Purchase Intentions in Medical Aesthetic Services. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bumgardner, M.S.; Nicholls, D.L. Sustainable Practices in Furniture Design: A Literature Study on Customization, Biomimicry, Competitiveness, and Product Communication. Forests 2020, 11, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thatavarthi, N.L.S. Enhancing Customer Experience in Furniture Retail through Full Stack E-commerce Platforms. J. Technol. Innov. 2021, 2, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Le, T.D.; Tran, K.T.; Nguyen, D.P.; Quach, K.V.; Le, L.T.T.; Quach, L.-D. Augmented Reality System in Furniture Sales Management Simulation in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Information Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 23–25 February 2024; pp. 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojala, A.; Rollins, M.; Fraccastoro, S.; Gabrielsson, M. The Internationalization of B2B Digital Platform Providers: The Role of Cross-National Distance and Digital Characteristics. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2020; pp. 4652–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.M. Convergence Catalysts: Exploring the Fusion of Embedded Systems, IoT, and Artificial Intelligence. In Engineering Applications of AI and Swarm Intelligence; Yang, X.-S., Ed.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, J.; Wang, M.; Zeng, X.; Qu, W.; Vassiliadis, V.S. Mass personalization strategy under Industrial Internet of Things: A case study on furniture production. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 50, 101439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hristova, Y. The Second-Hand Goods Market: Trends and Challenges. Izv. J. Union Sci. Varna. Econ. Sci. Ser. 2019, 8, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrache, B.G.; Ismana-Ilisan, C.M.; Cretoiu, R. The Opinions and Preferences of the European Buyers on the Furniture and Furniture Accessories Market. Ann. Spiru Haret Univ. Econ. Ser. 2019, 19, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, C.; Liu, W.; Fei, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, Z. Influencing Factors of Online Furniture Purchase Behavior Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. BioResources 2023, 18, 2857–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Więcek-Janka, E.; Łukaszewicz, S.; Raczak, M.; Cruz Sanchez, Z. Influence of Product Cards Construction and Contents on Customer Purchase Intentions. Study Based on Example of Household Appliances in Online Store. Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Poznańskiej 2020, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.M.; Paraschiv, N. Comparative analysis among frequency sampling algorithm applied in microwave measurements. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing, Sinaia, Romania, 10–12 October 2018; pp. 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cahyanaputra, M.; Jimmy, Y.; Annas, M. Factors Affecting Purchase Intention and Purchase Behaviour Electronic Products (Home Appliance) in Online Transaction. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Economics, Business, and Entrepreneurship, Lampung, Indonesia, 7 October 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, C.; Lin, B. Do consumers concern about energy saving in purchasing energy-efficient home appliances? Evidence from online e-commerce review. Energy Policy 2024, 193, 114277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, H. Exploring energy-saving refrigerators through online e-commerce reviews: An augmented mining model based on machine learning methods. Kybernetes 2021, 51, 2768–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svobodová, Z.; Rajchlová, J. Strategic Behavior of E-Commerce Businesses in Online Industry of Electronics from a Customer Perspective. Adm. Sci. 2020, 10, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbos, R.-A.; Bunea, O.-I.; Breazu, A. Influence of online consumer reviews on the sales of large household appliances: A survey in Romania. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 25, 2503–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lup, P.S.; Negrea, R.; Gabriela, P. Testing the Trust Dimensions of Romanian Consumers in Ecommerce for Electronic and Household Appliances. Acta Tech. Napocensis. Ser. Appl. Math. Mech. Eng. 2021, 64, 265–274. [Google Scholar]
- Debadutta, D.; Raja, R.T. Effects of E-Commerce on Purchasing Building Materials for Sustainable Building. Dogo Rangsang Res. J. 2019, 9, 289–293. Available online: https://www.journal-dogorangsang.in/no_1_jan-april_20/37.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2025).
- Stancu, A. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on International Agricultural Trade in European Countries. In Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Trade; Erokhin, V., Tianming, G., Andrei, J.V., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 263–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saputra, R.H.; Waziana, W.; Sari, D.N. Implementation of E-Commerce For Building Materials And Cement Products As A Strategy to Deal With The Omicron Variant Pandemic. J. Intell. Bus. Technol. Sci. 2021, 2, 106–112. Available online: https://journal.sracademicpublishing.org/index.php/JIBTec/article/view/21 (accessed on 18 May 2025).
- Mulyawan, B.; Vionelsy; Sutrisno, T. Product recommendation system on building materials shopping using FP-Growth algorithm. In Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference of the Applications of Technology and Engineering, Jakarta, Indonesia, 3–4 August 2020; p. 12144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.M. Comparative Analysis of Object Classification Algorithms: Traditional Image Processing Versus Artificial Intelligence—Based Approach. Rom. J. Pet. Gas Technol. 2023, IV (LXXV), 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blancaflor, E.; Pinili, M.V.; Zamora, S.L.; Santos, S.A. Design of an Online Community-Driven Marketplace portal for Cultivated Plants with Learning Materials Integration. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Modern Educational Technology, Macau, China, 24–26 May 2022; pp. 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soegoto, E.S.; Badria, S.G. E-Commerce on Fashion Business. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities. New Era, the Trend towards Global Challenge after COVID-19 Pandemic, Bandung, Indonesia, 17 December 2020; pp. 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guercini, S.; Bernal, P.M.; Prentice, C. New marketing in fashion e-commerce. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2018, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Tajuddin, R.B.M. Optimization Strategies of Virtual Presence on Fashion User Behavior in Live Streaming E-Commerce. In Digitalization and Management Innovation II; Dwyer, R.J., Ed.; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 376, pp. 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, C.; Lee, D.; Lim, H. Development of Fashion Product Retrieval and Recommendations Model Based on Deep Learning. Electronics 2020, 9, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, L.; Ismail, N.A.; Yongfa, L.; Chong, C.W.; Zhang, Y.Y. Critical Evaluation of Cultural Differences Between the UK and China Markets for Fashion Clothing: Identifying Links Between Marketing Communications Necessary for Success in Both Countries. J. Sci. Rep. 2022, 5, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giasi, W.R.; Rahardja, C.; Anandya, D. Factors Affecting Fashion Product Customer Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Management, Surabaya, Indonesia, 19–21 May 2022; pp. 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-Prados, A.; Muñoz-Leiva, F.; Prados-Peña, M.B. The role of customer brand engagement in the use of Instagram as a “shop window” for fashion-industry social commerce. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2022, 26, 495–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Hoque, M.T.; Rushan, M.R.I.; Rahman, M.I. Millennials’ purchasing behavior toward fashion clothing brands: Influence of brand awareness and brand schematicity. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2021, 25, 153–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Paraschiv, N. Frequency sampling algorithm applied in microwave measurements based on extreme points. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Iasi, Romania, 28–30 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idrees, S.; Vignali, G.; Gill, S. 3D Body Scanning with Mobile Application: An Introduction to Globalise Mass-Customisation with Pakistani Fashion E-Commerce Unstitched Apparel Industry. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference and Exhibition on 3D Body Scanning and Processing Technologies, Online, 17–18 November 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linus, H.B.; Gisip, I.A.; Guililing, H. Brand Loyalty of Millennials to Online Fashion Brands; E-commerce Sites in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2022, 12, 2261–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Park, J.; Glovinsky, P.L. Customer involvement, fashion consciousness, and loyalty for fast-fashion retailers. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2018, 22, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triani, M.; Hasan, D.G.; Susanto, Y.B. Analyzing Organization Culture’s Role on Digital Transformation During Pandemic Era: An Ethnographic Study. Indones. J. Multidiscip. Sci. 2023, 2, 4023–4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X. Countermeasures on the Upgrading and Transformation of the Traditional General Merchandise Industry in the Internet age. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development, Sanya, China, 18–20 January 2019; pp. 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Li, F.; Feng, J.; Xu, S. Research on Location Selection of General Merchandise Store Based on Machine Learning. In Advances in Swarm Intelligence, ICSI 2023, Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Luo, W., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 13969, pp. 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M. New Algorithm to Prevent Online Test Fraud Based on Cognitive Services and Input Devices Events. In Proceedings of the Third Emerging Trends and Technologies on Intelligent Systems, ETTIS 2023, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems,C-DAC, Noida, India. Online, 23–24 February 2023; Noor, A., Saroha, K., Pricop, E., Sen, A., Trivedi, G., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; Volume 730, pp. 207–219. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, B.; Yang, S.; Hu, B.; Zhang, Z.; He, Y.; Huang, K.; Zhou, J.; Fang, Y. Gaia: Graph Neural Network with Temporal Shift aware Attention for Gross Merchandise Value Forecast in E-commerce. In Proceedings of the IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 9–12 May 2022; pp. 3320–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsmadi, A.A.; Shuhaiber, A.; Al-Okaily, M.; Al-Gasaymeh, A.; Alrawashdeh, N. Big data analytics and innovation in e-commerce: Current insights and future directions. J. Financ. Serv. Mark. 2023, 29, 1635–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffy, E.W.; Lo, A.; Hall, M.G.; Taillie, L.S.; Ng, S.W. Prevalence and demographic correlates of online grocery shopping: Results from a nationally representative survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 3079–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rummo, P.E.; Ali, S.H.; Kranick, J.; Thorpe, L.E.; Yi, S.S. Online Grocery Shopping Behaviors and Attitudes Among Asian Americans. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2023, 25, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alaimo, L.S.; Fiore, M.; Galati, A. How the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, S.; Hamadneh, N.N. Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subekti, R.; Viana Praningtyas, E.R.; Anggya Anggraini, P.A. Increasing Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention on Contemporary Food and Beverages Through E-commerce. Terbuka J. Econ. Bus. 2023, 4, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Paraschiv, N. Frequency sampling algorithm applied in microwave measurements based on step-size control method. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Ploiesti, Romania, 30 June–2 July 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasbi, I.; Syahputra, S.; Syarifuddin, S.; Wijaksana, T.I.; Farías, P. The impact of discount appeal of food ordering application on consumer satisfaction in Southeast Asia. J. East. Eur. Cent. Asian Res. 2022, 9, 978–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salqaura, S.A.; Sipayung, R.C.; Amelia, W.R.; Royani, I.; Alfifto. Conceptualizing Halal Product in the Context of Culinary in the Digital Era: E-Commerce and RideHailing Based. Int. J. Res. Rev. 2023, 10, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidayah, I.N.; Rohmah, N.F.; Saifuddin, M. Effectiveness of Digital Platforms as Food and Beverage Marketing Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Airlangga J. Innov. Manag. 2021, 2, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaniago, N.C.; Saputra, A.J.; Calosa, A.R.; Dewi, A.K.; Akuan, M.F.; Kholifah, N.; Bangsawan, S. Digital Marketing Design and Content Development at Nutrihub Lampung. Devot. J. Corner Community Serv. 2022, 1, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazi, S.; Attar, R.W.; Adam, N.A.; Hajli, N. Consumers’ social self-identity drivers on social commerce platforms-based food and beverage. Br. Food J. 2023, 125, 3050–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Zhu, Z.; Qaim, M.; Fan, S.; Tian, X. E-commerce improves dietary quality of rural households in China. Agribusiness 2023, 39, 1495–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, X.; Lv, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, C.; Li, H.; Ploeger, A. Factors influencing young adults’ organic food purchase intention on fresh food e-commerce platforms. Br. Food J. 2024, 126, 4277–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris-Lagoudakis, K. Online shopping and the healthfulness of grocery purchases. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2022, 104, 1050–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Bold, R.-A.; Gerea, A.-E. A Comprehensive Patient Triage Algorithm Incorporating ChatGPT API for Symptom-Based Healthcare Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the Emerging Trends and Technologies on Intelligent Systems. ETTIS 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Noida, India, 27-28 March 2024; Noor, A., Saroha, K., Pricop, E., Sen, A., Trivedi, G., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025; Volume 1073, pp. 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilong, W.; Wenkai, Z.; Zecheng, L. A Study of Consumer Purchase Intentions in E-Commerce Live Broadcast for Eye Health Products Based on Product and Host Discourse Attributes. In E-Business. Digital Empowerment for an Intelligent Future. WHICEB 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Tu, Y., Chi, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 481, pp. 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, K.Y.; Yuen, S.T.; Tan, O.K.; Minh Trang, P.T.; Lertatthakornkit, T.; Tee, P.K. The determinants of purchase decision towards among generation z via tiktok for health products of small and medium entrepreneurs. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.L.; Duong, Q.N. Analyzing the Influencers affecting Gen Z Customer’ Purchasing Behaviour on e-Commerce and Cosmetics in Vietnam. J. Adv. Res. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2024, 35, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarjono, H.; Soleiman, M.R.; Sugi, G.; Yohanes, H.; Silviya, I. Examining Purchase Intent in Indonesian E-commerce Cosmetics. In Proceedings of Ninth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, ICICT 2024 2024, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Yang, X., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adawiyah, S.R.; Purwandari, B.; Eitiveni, I.; Purwaningsih, E.H. The Influence of AI and AR Technology in Personalized Recommendations on Customer Usage Intention: A Case Study of Cosmetic Products on Shopee. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Ma, S.; Cao, L. The influence of confirmatory psychology on consumers’ purchase of sports goods on an e-commerce platform. J. Sport Psychol. 2023, 32, 20–28. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9114124 (accessed on 20 May 2025).
- Onete, C.B.; Sava, Ș.; Budz, S.; Chița, S.D. The Impact of COVID-19 on Online Consumer Behavior for Sports Equipment: A Trend Analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th BASIQ International Conference on New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, Constanța, Romania, 8–10 June 2023; pp. 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaopeng, H.; Lee, O.; Ahn, J. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Large Musical Instruments Online. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2021, 99, 5748–5761. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y. Design and Realization of the Campus Second-hand Musical Instrument Trading Platform Based on Java. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science, Changchun, China, 23–26 September 2021; pp. 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, K.; Singh, T. Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Amazon Books Sales: Empirical Evidence from India. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2793–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, Y.; Li, Q.; Xiao, Y. Click-through conversion rate prediction model of book e-commerce platform based on feature combination and representation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 238, 122276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomas, J.P.; Ancheta, C.; Deocadiz, N.; Marzoña, R. Sentiment Analysis on Medical Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Shops Customer Reviews. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering, Osaka, Japan, 25–27 October 2022; pp. 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.M.; Ariciu, A.V. Unlocking Customer Sentiment Insights with Azure Sentiment Analysis: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis. Rom. J. Pet. Gas Technol. 2023, IV (LXXV), 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; Han, X. The influence of price value on purchase intention among patients with chronic diseases in medical e-commerce during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1081196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halli, S.; Kaya, C.; Arslanli, K.Y. Sustainability factors affecting caregivers’ toy preferences: An evaluation of e-commerce best sellers in Turkey. J. Consum. Behav. 2024, 23, 1114–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, X.-Q.; Chiu, T.-P. Toys for Kidult: The Cross-Cultural Study of Customers’ Behavior Process of Designer Toys Online Visual Merchandise Display. In HCI International 2023 Posters, HCII 2023, Communications in Computer and Information Science; Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 1835, pp. 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Wang, J. The Influence of the TikTok Live Stream on Consumers’ Willingness of Buying Jewelry Products in China Based on SOR Model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture, Dalian, China, 21–23 June 2024; pp. 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarinkamar, S.; Rahimi Nik, A.; Heydari, A. A Conceptual Framework on Webrooming Behavior of Luxury Customers (The Case of Gold and Jewelry). Int. J. Digit. Content Manag. 2024, 5, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadykov, M.A. Factors of Digitalization Development on Gas Station Market Using Online Channels Example. In Digital Technologies in the New Socio-Economic Reality, ISCDTE 2021, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Ashmarina, S.I., Mantulenko, V.V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 304, pp. 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suditu, S.; Stoica, M.E.; Cristescu, T. Factors Influencing the Enhancement of Energy Efficiency in the Oil and Gas Industry. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education—MSE 2019 “Trends in New Industrial Revolution”, Sibiu, Romania, 5–7 June 2019; p. 10007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Paraschiv, N. Increased speed in microwave measurements based on spline interpolation model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Development and Application Systems, Suceava, Romania, 19–21 May 2016; pp. 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The United States Census Bureau. Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales. 2024. Available online: https://www.census.gov/retail/ecommerce.html (accessed on 15 December 2024).
- Lütkepohl, H. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, J.D. Time Series Analysis; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Enders, W. Applied Econometric Time Series, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Box, G.E.P.; Jenkins, G.M.; Reinsel, G.C.; Ljung, G.M. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 8th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gujarati, D.N.; Porter, D.C. Basic Econometrics, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Tsay, R.S. Analysis of Financial Time Series, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Paraschiv, N. Frequency sampling algorithm applied in microwave measurements. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing, Sinaia, Romania, 19–21 October 2017; pp. 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabor, M.R.; Dorgo, L.A. Neural networks versus Box Jenkins method for turnover forecasting: A case study on the Romanian organization. Transform. Bus. Econ. 2017, 16, 187–210. [Google Scholar]
- Klimek, P. ARIMA control charts for financial data. In Proceedings of the Finance and the Performance of Firms in Science, Education and Practice, Online, 25–26 April 2013; pp. 358–368. [Google Scholar]
- Veiga, C.P.D.; Veiga, C.R.P.D.; Puchalski, W.; Coelho, L.D.S.; Tortato, U. Demand forecasting based on natural computing approaches applied to the foodstuff retail segment. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 31, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zou, H.; Su, J.; Li, L.; Chaudhry, S. An ARIMA-ANN Hybrid Model for Time Series Forecasting. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2013, 30, 244–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourbonnais, R.; Usunier, J.-C. Pratique de la Prevision des Ventes, Conception de Systemes, 2nd ed.; Economica: Paris, France, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez, P.; Teixeira, J.; Ferreira, J.; Azevedo, S.G. Modelling Tourism Demand: A Comparative Study Between Artificial Neural Networks And The Box-Jenkins Methodology. Rom. J. Econ. Forecast. 2008, 5, 30–50. [Google Scholar]
- Newbold, P. The Principles of the Box-Jenkins Approach. Oper. Res. Quaterly 1975, 26, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pecican, E.Ş. Econometrics for Economists, Theory and Applications, 3rd ed.; Economica: Bucharest, Romania, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Pecican, E.Ş. Econometrie; ALL: Bucharest, Romania, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Isaic-Maniu, A.; Pecican, E.Ș.; Stefanescu, D.; Vodă, V.G.; Wagner, P. Dictionary of General Statistics; Economica: Bucharest, Romania, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Rosel, J.; Jara, P.; Arnau, J. Geometrical Interpretation of the Mean and the Constant in a Box-Jenkins Time Series Model. Qual. Quant. 2002, 36, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, C.-M.; Cărbureanu, M. A Comparative Analysis of Sorting Algorithms for Large-Scale Data: Performance Metrics and Language Efficiency. In Proceedings of the Emerging Trends and Technologies on Intelligent Systems, ETTIS 2024, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Noida, India, 27–28 March 2024; Noor, A., Saroha, K., Pricop, E., Sen, A., Trivedi, G., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025; Volume 1073, pp. 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrei, T.; Bourbonnais, R. Econometrie; Economica: Bucharest, Romania, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Batchelor, R. Box-Jenkins Analysis, Lecture Notes; ESCP-EAP: Paris, France, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Boosarawongse, R.; Co, H.C.; Feng, P. Box-Jenkins vs. Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Commodity Prices Forecasting the Export Prices of Thai Rice. In Proceedings of the International DSI/Asia and Pacific DSI, Bangkok, Thailand, 11–15 July 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, P.; Chandra, A.; Kaushik, S.C. Forecasts using Box–Jenkins models for the ambient air quality data of Delhi City. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 157, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmani, V.; Kordrostami, E. Price sensitivity and online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Consum. Mark. 2023, 40, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, V.; Liu, O.; Barbole, K.V.; Xu, Q.A.; Gao, X.J.; Tabrizi, W. Customer Behavioral Trends in Online Grocery Shopping During COVID-19. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2023, 31, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pollák, F.; Markovič, P.; Vavrek, R.; Konečný, M. Return to the New Normal: Empirical Analysis of Changes in E-Consumer Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Behav. Sci. 2022, 12, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stângaciu, A.; Țimiraș, L.; Zaiț, L.; Nichifor, B.; Danu, M.; Harja, E. The EU E-Commerce Market in a Pandemic Context—Linking Demographic Factors and Territorial Convergence. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2024, 25, 21–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Song, Y. Mobile Shopping during COVID-19: The Effect of Hedonic Experience on Brand Conspicuousness, Brand Identity and Associated Behavior. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tao, H.; Sun, X.; Liu, X.; Tian, J.; Zhang, D. The Impact of Consumer Purchase Behavior Changes on the Business Model Design of Consumer Services Companies Over the Course of COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 818845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gortoescu, I.A.; Tănase, R.M.; Rosca, C.-M. Soluție inteligentă pentru reciclarea alimentară. Bul. AGIR 2024, XXIV, 45–49. Available online: https://www.agir.ro/buletine/3357.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
- Tyrväinen, O.; Karjaluoto, H. Online grocery shopping before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analytical review. Telemat. Inform. 2022, 71, 101839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, W.; Oh, G.E.; Cho, H. Impact of COVID-19 on consumers’ impulse buying behavior of fitness products: A moderated mediation model. J. Consum. Behav. 2022, 21, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namin, A.; Ketron, S. Driving a difference: The role of the COVID-19 pandemic in U.S. consumers’ information search behaviors and purchasing of Japanese automobiles. J. Prod. Amp; Brand Manag. 2023, 32, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, W.M.; Qu, M.; Nunualvuttiwong, C.; Ngamcharoenmongkhon, K. Environmental Concerns, Sustainable Consumption, and COVID-19 Fear in Online Consumers: A Research Exploration. Theor. Pract. Res. Econ. Fields 2023, 14, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Schiaroli, V.; Fraccascia, L. Is COVID-19 changing sustainable consumer behavior? A survey of Italian consumers. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 30, 1477–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agnani, D.; Bavkar, A.; Salgar, S.; Ahir, S. Predicting E-commerce Sales & Inventory Management using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the ITM Web of Conferences, Navi Mumbai, India, 7–8 April 2022; p. 03040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Null Hypothesis | Sig.a,b | Decision |
---|---|---|
TSNST of TRT distribution is normal with a mean of 1,547,999 and a standard deviation of 219,447.423. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of TRT distribution is normal with a mean of 208,986 and a standard deviation of 62,670.002. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TSNST of MVP distribution is normal with a mean of 344,722 and a standard deviation of 44,812.723. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of MVP distribution is normal with a mean of 12,331 and a standard deviation of 2557.195. | 0.006 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TSNST of FBME distribution is normal with a mean of 185,621 and as standard deviation of 26,484.213. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of FBME is normal with a mean of 22,903 and a standard deviation of 6838.045. | 0.002 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of FHF distribution is normal with a mean of 4007 and a standard deviation of 1034.854. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of EA distribution is normal with a mean of 12,836 and a standard deviation of 2817.257. | 0.060 | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of BMGES distribution is normal with a mean of 7166 and a standard deviation of 2798.002. | 0.005 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TSNST of CGM distribution is normal with a mean of 297,223 and a standard deviation of 46,831.792. | 0.189 | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of CGM distribution is normal with a mean of 37,184 and a standard deviation of 13,427.570. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of CCA distribution is normal with a mean of 14,946 and a standard deviation of 4387.663. | 0.008 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of GM distribution is normal with a mean of 22,237 and a standard deviation of 9224.068. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TSNST of AO distribution is normal with a mean of 537,347 and a standard deviation of 67,287.733. | 0.006 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of AO distribution is normal with a mean of 14,840 and a standard deviation of 4780.193. | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of FB distribution is normal with a mean of 5801 and a standard deviation of 2705.310. | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of HPS distribution is normal with a mean of 1988 and a standard deviation of 664.160. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of SGHMIB distribution is normal with a mean of 3000 and a standard deviation of 897.134. | 0.068 | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of MGS distribution is normal with a mean of 4191 and a standard deviation of 685.983. | 0.002 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TSNST of NSR distribution is normal with a mean of 183,086 and a standard deviation of 48,914.977. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TEC of NSR distribution is normal with a mean of 121,728 and a standard deviation of 36,456.889. | 0.200 c | Retain the null hypothesis. |
TSNSS/TEC | TRT | MVP | FBME | CGM | AO | NSR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSNSS | N | Valid | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Mean | 1,547,999.36 | 34,4721.88 | 185,620.52 | 297,223.28 | 537,347.32 | 183,086.36 | ||
Median | 1,540,531.00 | 341,507.00 | 185,875.00 | 303,170.00 | 505,910.00 | 186,214.00 | ||
Std. Deviation | 219,447.423 | 44,812.723 | 26,484.213 | 46,831.792 | 67,287.733 | 48,914.977 | ||
Minimum | 1,214,805 | 267,945 | 138,049 | 230,762 | 443,823 | 114,152 | ||
Maximum | 1,892,581 | 414,552 | 228,052 | 393,257 | 640,567 | 276,657 | ||
TEC | N | Valid | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Mean | 208,986.12 | 12,331.12 | 22,903.24 | 37,183.60 | 14,840.24 | 121,727.92 | ||
Median | 224,757.00 | 12,847.00 | 25,793.00 | 38,268.00 | 16,753.00 | 129,825.00 | ||
Std. Deviation | 62,670.002 | 2557.195 | 6838.045 | 13,427.570 | 4780.193 | 36,456.889 | ||
Minimum | 111,690 | 8172 | 12,727 | 16,394 | 7523 | 66,813 | ||
Maximum | 32,2862 | 15,840 | 33,469 | 62,779 | 21,869 | 19,2843 |
FHF | EA | BMGES | CCA | GM | FB | HPS | SGHMIB | MGS | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Valid | 19 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Missing | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Mean | 4006.53 | 12,835.65 | 7166.40 | 14,946.28 | 22,237.32 | 5800.58 | 1987.76 | 3000.04 | 4191.48 | |
Median | 4196.00 | 12,592.50 | 8471.00 | 15,088.00 | 22,826.00 | 7225.50 | 1947.00 | 3131.00 | 4476.00 | |
Std. Deviation | 1034.854 | 2817.257 | 2798.002 | 4387.663 | 9224.068 | 2705.310 | 664.160 | 897.134 | 685.983 | |
Minimum | 2478 | 7385 | 2748 | 8489 | 7905 | 1417 | 1042 | 1703 | 3152 | |
Maximum | 5662 | 18,622 | 10,916 | 23,320 | 39,469 | 8868 | 3429 | 4601 | 5082 |
Null Hypothesis | Sig. | Decision |
---|---|---|
TSNSS of TRT distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis |
TSNSS of MVP distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis |
TSNSS of FBME distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis |
TSNSS of CGM distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | 0.003 | Reject the null hypothesis |
TSNSS of AO distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis |
TSNSS of NSR distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis |
Null Hypothesis | Sig. | Decision |
---|---|---|
TEC of TRT distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of MVP distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of FBME distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of FHF distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | 0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of EA distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | 0.010 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of BMGES distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of CGM distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of CCA distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | 0.004 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of GM distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of AO distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of FB distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of HPS distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of SGHMIB distribution is the same across categories Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of MGS distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
TEC of NSR distribution is the same across categories of Pre/during/post COVID-19 | <0.001 | Reject the null hypothesis. |
Types of E-Commerce | Pre- Pandemic | During Pandemic | During/Pre (%) | Post-Pandemic | Post/During (%) | Post/Pre (%) | [Post/Pre (%)—During/Pre (%)]/During/Pre (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 = 2/1 | 4 | 5 = 4/2 | 6 = 4/1 | 7 = (6 − 3)/3 |
TRT | 136,107.22 ± 21,275.280 | 230,756.29 ± 28,057.793 | 169.5 | 264,932.67 ± 28,780.271 | 114.8 | 194.6 | 14.8 |
MVP | 9355.78 ± 656.498 | 131,85.57 ± 1706.253 | 140.9 | 14,641.89 ± 630.953 | 111.0 | 156.5 | 11.0 |
FBME | 14,538.33 ± 1942.593 | 27,506.14 ± 3312.669 | 189.2 | 27,688.11 ± 2293.299 | 100.7 | 190.4 | 0.7 |
CGM | 22,847.56 ± 6480.572 | 42,848.14 ± 8977.690 | 187.5 | 47,113.89 ± 8259.925 | 110.0 | 206.2 | 10.0 |
AO | 8945.56 ± 1382.249 | 17,468.57 ± 1585.802 | 195.3 | 18,690.67 ± 1714.561 | 107.0 | 208.9 | 7.0 |
NSR | 80,420.00 ± 11,667.197 | 129,747.86 ± 14,719.021 | 161.3 | 156,798.11 ± 18,141.907 | 120.8 | 195.0 | 20.8 |
Sub-Types of E-Commerce | Pre- Pandemic | During Pandemic | During/Pre (%) | Post-Pandemic | Post/During (%) | Post/Pre (%) | [Post/Pre (%)—During/Pre (%)]/During/Pre (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 = 2/1 | 4 | 5 = 4/2 | 6 = 4/1 | 7 = (6 − 3)/3 |
FHF | 2844.71 ± 368.231 | 5038.67 ± 560.008 | 177.1 | 4566.11 ± 544.636 | 90.6 | 160.5 | −9.4 |
EA | 9011.50± 1817.399 | 14,174.71 ± 2571.558 | 157.3 | 13,493.78± 812.084 | 95.2 | 149.7 | −4.8 |
BMGES | 3688.89 ± 564.288 | 8472.29 ± 795.451 | 229.7 | 9628.22 ± 882.289 | 113.6 | 261.0 | 13.6 |
CCA | 10,853.22 ± 2764.693 | 169,60.57 ± 3519.601 | 156.3 | 17,472.67 ± 3353.004 | 103.0 | 161.0 | 3.0 |
GM | 11,994.33 ± 3752.069 | 25,887.57 ± 5476.962 | 215.8 | 29641.22 ± 5226.094 | 114.5 | 247.1 | 14.5 |
FB | 2183.63 ± 922.325 | 7293.29 ± 496.574 | 334.0 | 7854.67 ± 577.312 | 107.7 | 359 | 7.7 |
HPS | 1338.22 ± 298.615 | 2155.00 ± 450.125 | 161.0 | 2507.22 ± 528.692 | 116.3 | 187.4 | 16.3 |
SGHMIB | 2022.11 ± 319.015 | 3612.29 ± 560.741 | 178.6 | 3501.78 ± 624.393 | 96.9 | 173.2 | −3.1 |
MGS | 3387.56 ± 180.084 | 4408.00 ± 410.900 | 130.1 | 4827.00 ± 173.738 | 109.5 | 142.5 | 9.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Popescu, C.; Gabor, M.R.; Stancu, A. E-Commerce Revolution: How the Pandemic Reshaped the US Consumer Shopping Habits: A PACF and ARIMA Approach. Systems 2025, 13, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090802
Popescu C, Gabor MR, Stancu A. E-Commerce Revolution: How the Pandemic Reshaped the US Consumer Shopping Habits: A PACF and ARIMA Approach. Systems. 2025; 13(9):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090802
Chicago/Turabian StylePopescu, Catalin, Manuela Rozalia Gabor, and Adrian Stancu. 2025. "E-Commerce Revolution: How the Pandemic Reshaped the US Consumer Shopping Habits: A PACF and ARIMA Approach" Systems 13, no. 9: 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090802
APA StylePopescu, C., Gabor, M. R., & Stancu, A. (2025). E-Commerce Revolution: How the Pandemic Reshaped the US Consumer Shopping Habits: A PACF and ARIMA Approach. Systems, 13(9), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090802