Driving Green Transformation in Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: The Role of Digital Technologies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses
2.1. Literature Review
2.2. Research Hypotheses
2.2.1. The Impact of Digital Technologies on Corporate Green Transformation
2.2.2. The Mediating Role of Green Innovation in the Relationship Between Digital Technologies and Corporate Green Transformation
2.2.3. The Mediating Role of the Market Environment in Corporate Green Transformation
3. Research Design
3.1. Sample and Data Sources
3.2. Model Specification
3.3. Variable Measurement
3.3.1. Dependent Variable: Green Transformation Degree (GTP)
3.3.2. Independent Variable: Digital Technology Application Degree (DT)
3.3.3. Mediating Variables: Green Innovation (GI) and Market Environment (ME)
3.3.4. Control Variables
4. Empirical Results Analysis
4.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis
4.2. Benchmark Regression Results
4.3. Endogeneity Test
4.4. Mechanism Verification
4.4.1. Mediating Effect of Green Innovation
4.4.2. Mediating Effect of Market Environment
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, B.; Song, P. Driving force mechanism of the core green technology innovation of equipment manufacturing enterprises towards industry 5.0 in China. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 1404378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S.; Zhang, N.; Ullah, K.; Gao, S. Enhancing digital innovation for the sustainable transformation of manufacturing industry: A pressure-state-response system framework to perceptions of digital green innovation and its performance for green and intelligent manufacturing. Systems 2022, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Liu, Y. The Influence of digital innovation ecosystem of high-end equipment manufacturing on the intelligent maturity of enterprise—An empirical study on the sonfiguration of the “Three-Layer Core-Periphery” structure. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2024, 30, 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, Q.; Gao, X. How does the digital transformation of corporates affect green technology innovation? An empirical study from the perspective of asymmetric effects and structural breakpoints. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 428, 139245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebauer, H.; Fleisch, E.; Lamprecht, C.; Wortmann, F. Growth paths for overcoming the digitalization paradox. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, C.; Yang, Y.; Wu, T. Research on the impact of digital transformation on green development of manufacturing enterprises. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 10, 1045328. [Google Scholar]
- Liakhovych, G.; Kupchak, V.; Borysiak, O.; Huhul, O.; Halysh, N.; Brych, V.; Sokol, M. Innovative human capital management of energy enterprises and the role of shaping the environmental behavior of consumers of green energy based on the work of smart grids. Propos. Represent. 2021, 9, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Nutakor, F.; Minlah, M.K.; Li, J. Can digital transformation drive green transformation in manufacturing companies?—Based on socio-technical systems theory perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, S.; Yimamu, N.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Irfan, M.; Hao, Y. Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 1847–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Hong, J.; Zhu, K.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, D. Dynamic capability matters: Uncovering its fundamental role in decision making of environmental innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chmita, H.; Becker, B. From Sustainable Development to the Green Transformation—A Rough Guide; Briefing Paper; IDS: Brighton, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kemp, R. Eco-innovation: Definition, measurement and open research issues. Econ. Political 2010, 27, 397–420. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.T.; Li, Z.D.; Tang, F.C. The effect of carbon price volatility on firm green transitions: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed firms. Energies 2022, 15, 7456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wu, S.S. Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 153, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Xiong, W. The impact of digital transformation on corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022, 19, 12846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Nie, C. Digital technology innovation and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from a sample of listed firms in China. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2024, 31, 3836–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Chen, Y.; Luan, F. Air pollution, water pollution, and robots: Is technology the panacea. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 330, 117170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, G.; He, L.Y.; Lin, X. Robot adoption and energy performance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Energy Econ. 2022, 107, 105837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acemoglu, D.; Restrepo, P. Robots and jobs, evidence from US labor markets. J. Political Econ. 2020, 128, 2188–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandberg, J.; Holmström, J.; Lyytinen, K. Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: Evidence from the process automation industry. MIS Q. 2020, 44, 129–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Dong, J.Q.; Fabian, N.; Haenleinc, M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mubarak, M.F.; Tiwari, S.; Petraite, M.; Mubarik, M.; Raja Mohd Rasi, R.Z. How industry 4. 0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance? Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2021, 32, 1007–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Liu, F.; Ren, X. Firms’ digitalization in manufacturing and the structure and direction of green innovation. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 335, 117525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Porter, M.E.; Heppelmann, J.E. How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2015, 93, 96–114. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, J.X.; Li, L.X.; Zhao, J.S. How does fintech prompt corporations toward ESG sustainable development? Evidence from China. Energy Econ. 2024, 131, 107387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.; Nie, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, H. Digital transformation and low-carbon technology innovation in manufacturing firms: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 263, 108969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usai, A.; Fiano, F.; Petruzzelli, A.M.; Paoloni, P.; Briamonte, M.F.; Orlando, B. Unveiling the Impact of the Adoption of Digital Technologies on Firms ‘Innovation Performance. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajli, N. Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, S.; Santarius, T.; Pohl, J. Digitalization and energy consumption: Does CT reduce energy demand? Ecol. Econ. 2020, 176, 106760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhar, P. The carbon impact of artificial intelligence. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020, 2, 423–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.; Wang, F.; Deng, F.; Xiang, X. Impact of digital transformation on enterprise carbon intensity: The moderating role of digital information resources. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Zhang, L.; Peng, L.; Zhou, H.; Hu, F. Enterprise pollution reduction through digital transformation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprisess. Technol. Soc. 2024, 77, 102520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Guo, F. Digital transformation and environmence: Evidence from Chinese based enterprises. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2023, 30, 1816–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.; Jiang, K.; Zhang, J. Environmental benefits of enterprise digitalization in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 197, 107082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, R.; Gupta, L. An integrated AI framework for managing organizational risk and climate change concerns in B2B market. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2024, 117, 173–187. [Google Scholar]
- Foss, N.J.; Saebi, T. Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? J. Manag. 2017, 43, 200–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhong, N.; Tu, X.; Jia, J.; Wang, J. Tackling environmental challenges in pollution controls using artificial intelligence: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 25, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bo, Q.; Liu, H.; Zheng, J. Research on the mechanism of the green innovation of enterprises empowered by digital technology from the perspective of value co-Creation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, T.; Appolloni, A.; Chen, J. How does corporate digital transformation affect carbon productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 31425–31445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, L.; Li, Z. Corporate digitalization and green Innovation: Evidence from textual analysis of firm annual reports and corporate green patent data in China. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2024, 33, 3936–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.Y.; Xu, Y.B. Digital economy, industrial structure upgrading and green in-novation efficiency of family enterprises. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2024, 20, 479–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, X.; Li, Y.; Ren, S.; Wu, H.; Hao, Y. The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter? J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Y.; Xu, K.; Shan, Y.G. Leveraging corporate digitalization for green technology innovation: The mediating role of resource endowments. Technovation 2024, 133, 102999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrington, T.; Alizadeh, A. On the impact of digitalization on R&D. Res.-Technol. Manag. 2017, 60, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D. How does digitalization influence innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises in emerging countries? The perspective of dual innovation synergy. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024, 33, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 4333–4355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S.; Yu, Y. An adoption-implementation framework of digital green knowledge to improve the performance of digital green innovation practices for industry 5.0. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, M.S.; Ma, S.S.; Wang, Y.; Tian, Q. Impact of technology-enabled product eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. Technovation 2023, 128, 102853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Qi, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Pang, Y. Environmental decentralization and carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 123193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasiri, M.; Ukko, J.; Saunila, M.; Rantala, T. Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies. Technovation 2020, 96, 102121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y. The impact of digital transformation on firm’s financial performance: Evidence from China. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2024, 124, 2021–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galindo Martín, M.A.; Castaño Martínez, M.S.; Méndez Picazo, M.T. Digital transformation, digital dividends and entrepreneurship: A quantitative analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable Type | Variable Name | Variable Symbol | Variable Definition |
---|---|---|---|
Dependent Variable | Green Transformation Degree | GTP | Comprehensive evaluation of the enterprise’s economic and environmental performance |
Independent Variable | Digital Technology Application Degree | DT | Natural logarithm of the frequency count of digital technology-related terms in the annual report plus 1 |
Mediating Variable | Green Innovation | GI | Assessment outcomes regarding the green innovation efficiency of enterprises |
Market Environment | ME | Provincial marketization index obtained from the China Marketization Index Database | |
Control Variable | Enterprise Size | Size | Natural logarithm of total assets at the end of the year |
Enterprise Leverage Ratio | Lev | Ratio of total assets to total liabilities | |
Growth Potential | Grow | Growth rate of operating income | |
Ownership Concentration | Shrcr | Percentage of shares held by the largest shareholder | |
Dual Role | Presmn | 1 if the chairman and CEO roles are combined, otherwise 0 | |
Listing Age | Age | Natural logarithm of the number of years since the enterprise was listed | |
Industry | Industy | Controls for industry factors | |
Year | Year | Controls for year factors |
Variable | GTP | DT | GI | ME | Size | Lev | Grow | Shrcr | Presmn | Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTP | 1.000 | |||||||||
DT | 0.145 *** | 1.000 | ||||||||
GI | 0.380 *** | 0.164 *** | 1.000 | |||||||
ME | 0.237 *** | 0.188 *** | 0.249 ** | 1.000 | ||||||
Size | 0.149 *** | 0.180 ** | 0.165 *** | 0.050 ** | 1.000 | |||||
Lev | 0.117 *** | 0.019 | 0143 *** | 0.100 ** | 0.550 *** | 1.000 | ||||
Grow | −0.040 ** | 0.051 *** | −0.048 *** | −0.129 *** | −0.062 *** | −0.054 *** | 1.000 | |||
Shrcr | −0.113 *** | −0.085 *** | −0.109 *** | −0.078 *** | −0.031 * | −0.039 ** | 0.001 | 1.000 | ||
Presmn | 0.0131 | 0.070 *** | −0.033 ** | 0.118 *** | −0.095 *** | −0.070 *** | −0.020 | 0.042 *** | 1.000 | |
Age | 0.322 *** | 0.169 *** | 0.325 *** | 0.135 *** | 0.528 *** | 0.426 *** | −0.032 * | −0.159 *** | −0.136 *** | 1.000 |
Mean | 0.583 | 1.875 | 0.584 | 10.23 | 22.14 | 0.397 | 0.299 | 29.53 | 0.336 | 2.351 |
S.D. | 0.186 | 1.407 | 0.190 | 1.305 | 1.156 | 0.178 | 0.793 | 13.27 | 0.472 | 0.493 |
Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) |
---|---|---|---|
GTP | GTP | GTP | |
DT | 0.023 *** (6.68) | 0.014 *** (3.72) | 0.150 *** (4.25) |
Size | −0.005 (−1.29) | −0.008 * (−1.88) | |
Lev | −0.010 (−0.66) | 0.011 (0.84) | |
Grow | −0.008 (−1.69) | −0.009 * (−1.89) | |
Shrcr | −0.001 *** (−4.32) | −0.001 *** (−4.48) | |
Presmn | 0.019 ** (3.05) | 0.018 ** (2.70) | |
Age | 0.122 *** (15.86) | 0.125 *** (12.88) | |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ind | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Constant | 0.563 *** (94.56) | 0.454 *** (5.04) | 0.512 *** (5.44) |
Observations | 3810 | 3810 | 3429 |
R2 | 0.028 | 0.124 | 0.107 |
Variable | Heckman Two-Step Method | Instrumental Variable Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result Equation | Selection Equation | |||
DT | 0.011 *** (2.90) | 0.168 * (1.85) | 0.018 *** (4.50) | |
IV | 0.836 *** (104.90) | |||
IMR | −0.316 | |||
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ind | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Constant | 0.534 (3.86) | −12.041 (−3.57) | −0.889 *** (−5.85) | 0.528 *** (5.86) |
Observations | 3886 | 3902 | 3429 | 3429 |
Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
GI | GTP | ME | GTP | |
DT | 0.017 *** (6.26) | 0.009 *** (3.28) | 0.146 *** (6.25) | 0.010 ** (3.09) |
GI | 0.289 *** (12.79) | |||
ME | 0.026 *** (11.88) | |||
Control Variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ind | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Constant | 0.426 *** (6.93) | 0.332 *** (4.24) | 11.823 *** (10.25) | 0.140 *** (1.94) |
Observations | 3810 | 3810 | 3810 | 3810 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xu, W.; Xu, J.; Zhang, W. Driving Green Transformation in Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: The Role of Digital Technologies. Systems 2025, 13, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050332
Xu W, Xu J, Zhang W. Driving Green Transformation in Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: The Role of Digital Technologies. Systems. 2025; 13(5):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050332
Chicago/Turabian StyleXu, Weiyang, Jianzhong Xu, and Wei Zhang. 2025. "Driving Green Transformation in Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: The Role of Digital Technologies" Systems 13, no. 5: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050332
APA StyleXu, W., Xu, J., & Zhang, W. (2025). Driving Green Transformation in Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: The Role of Digital Technologies. Systems, 13(5), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050332