Next Article in Journal
Digital Twin Integration for Workforce Training: Transforming SMEs in the Ornamental Stone Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Systems Developmental Dependency Analysis for Scheduling Decision Support: The Lunar Gateway Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
iEVEM: Big Data-Empowered Framework for Intelligent Electric Vehicle Energy Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Method for Selecting Architecture Alternatives and Reconfiguration Options Towards System-of-Systems Resilience
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering

1
Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Mälardalen University, SE-721 23 Västerås, Sweden
2
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-164 29 Kista, Sweden
Systems 2025, 13(2), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020119
Submission received: 5 December 2024 / Revised: 8 February 2025 / Accepted: 11 February 2025 / Published: 13 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue System of Systems Engineering)

Abstract

Systems-of-systems are often characterized as systems where the constituent parts have some independence from the whole. Recent research has aimed at clarifying in more detail what this independence means. It has shown that independence requires the constituent systems to be agents that observe the system-of-systems from within and construct internal models of it as a basis for decisions. This view on observers as parts of the system-of-systems parallels development in the field of second-order cybernetics several decades ago, yet the connection between that field and systems-of-systems has not been explored previously. This paper, therefore, summarizes key concepts from second-order cybernetics, including the subtopic autopoiesis. It then discusses what the implications are on systems-of-systems engineering through the identification of 17 concerns. These concerns relate to the physical topology, behavior, and control of the system-of-systems. This paper shows how these concerns directly relate to the theoretical concepts of second-order cybernetics and autopoiesis, and thereby, opens the door to further exploitation of this theoretical foundation.
Keywords: systems-of-systems; second-order cybernetics; autopoiesis systems-of-systems; second-order cybernetics; autopoiesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Axelsson, J. Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering. Systems 2025, 13, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020119

AMA Style

Axelsson J. Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering. Systems. 2025; 13(2):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Axelsson, Jakob. 2025. "Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering" Systems 13, no. 2: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020119

APA Style

Axelsson, J. (2025). Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering. Systems, 13(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop