This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
From Frameworks to Implementation: Comparing Academic and Media Discourse on Climate-Resilient Supply Chains
by
Seungkwon Joo
Seungkwon Joo
and
Seung Jun Lee
Seung Jun Lee *
Chung-Ang Business School, College of Business and Economics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(12), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121057 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 October 2025
/
Revised: 17 November 2025
/
Accepted: 20 November 2025
/
Published: 23 November 2025
Abstract
This study examines the evolution of environmental discourse in supply chain management (SCM) research from 2004 to 2024, systematically comparing scholarly trajectories with media narratives to identify critical implementation gaps at the theory–practice interface. Following PRISMA guidelines, we employ structural topic modeling on 6586 academic articles and 384,190 media articles (2019–2023) within the SPAR-4-SLR protocol, we document substantial growth in sustainability scholarship—from fewer than 200 publications in 2004 to over 700 in 2024—with research emphasis shifting from compliance-oriented frameworks toward strategic integration models. Systematic comparison reveals significant misalignments: six domains—community-based sustainability initiatives, climate adaptation strategies, plastic reduction mandates, food security resilience, event-driven crisis responses, and sustainable product design—receive substantially greater media emphasis than scholarly investigation, constituting what we characterize as the implementation knowledge gap. This gap reflects disconnection between theoretically sophisticated academic frameworks emphasizing long-term strategic integration and practitioner concerns prioritizing acute operational challenges, rapid regulatory compliance, and grassroots sustainability mechanisms. Our findings demonstrate that, while academic research remains theoretically robust, it insufficiently captures short-term adaptation imperatives, community-level integration mechanisms, and sector-specific resilience strategies that climate volatility demands. By establishing a transferable analytical framework integrating media discourse with academic literature, this study advances sustainable supply chain management theory through reconceptualizing implementation challenges as central research concerns while generating actionable imperatives for aligning scholarship, policy interventions, and industrial strategies toward climate-resilient supply chain systems.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Joo, S.; Lee, S.J.
From Frameworks to Implementation: Comparing Academic and Media Discourse on Climate-Resilient Supply Chains. Systems 2025, 13, 1057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121057
AMA Style
Joo S, Lee SJ.
From Frameworks to Implementation: Comparing Academic and Media Discourse on Climate-Resilient Supply Chains. Systems. 2025; 13(12):1057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121057
Chicago/Turabian Style
Joo, Seungkwon, and Seung Jun Lee.
2025. "From Frameworks to Implementation: Comparing Academic and Media Discourse on Climate-Resilient Supply Chains" Systems 13, no. 12: 1057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121057
APA Style
Joo, S., & Lee, S. J.
(2025). From Frameworks to Implementation: Comparing Academic and Media Discourse on Climate-Resilient Supply Chains. Systems, 13(12), 1057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121057
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.