Next Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Positive Hospitalized Cancer Patients during the Italian Outbreak: The Cohort Study in Reggio Emilia
Previous Article in Journal
Biocontrol Potential of Purified Elicitor Protein PeBL1 Extracted from Brevibacillus laterosporus Strain A60 and Its Capacity in the Induction of Defense Process against Cucumber Aphid (Myzus persicae) in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Norpa Signalling and the Seasonal Circadian Locomotor Phenotype in Drosophila
Open AccessFeature PaperReview

Circadian Photoentrainment in Mice and Humans

Sleep & Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RF, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2020, 9(7), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9070180
Received: 9 June 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 5 July 2020 / Published: 21 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Clocks)
Light around twilight provides the primary entrainment signal for circadian rhythms. Here we review the mechanisms and responses of the mouse and human circadian systems to light. Both utilize a network of photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (pRGCs) expressing the photopigment melanopsin (OPN4). In both species action spectra and functional expression of OPN4 in vitro show that melanopsin has a λmax close to 480 nm. Anatomical findings demonstrate that there are multiple pRGC sub-types, with some evidence in mice, but little in humans, regarding their roles in regulating physiology and behavior. Studies in mice, non-human primates and humans, show that rods and cones project to and can modulate the light responses of pRGCs. Such an integration of signals enables the rods to detect dim light, the cones to detect higher light intensities and the integration of intermittent light exposure, whilst melanopsin measures bright light over extended periods of time. Although photoreceptor mechanisms are similar, sensitivity thresholds differ markedly between mice and humans. Mice can entrain to light at approximately 1 lux for a few minutes, whilst humans require light at high irradiance (>100’s lux) and of a long duration (>30 min). The basis for this difference remains unclear. As our retinal light exposure is highly dynamic, and because photoreceptor interactions are complex and difficult to model, attempts to develop evidence-based lighting to enhance human circadian entrainment are very challenging. A way forward will be to define human circadian responses to artificial and natural light in the “real world” where light intensity, duration, spectral quality, time of day, light history and age can each be assessed. View Full-Text
Keywords: circadian; entrainment; human; melanopsin (OPN4); mouse; photoreceptor circadian; entrainment; human; melanopsin (OPN4); mouse; photoreceptor
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Foster, R.G.; Hughes, S.; Peirson, S.N. Circadian Photoentrainment in Mice and Humans. Biology 2020, 9, 180.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop