Next Article in Journal
Ornithine Aminotransferase, an Important Glutamate-Metabolizing Enzyme at the Crossroads of Multiple Metabolic Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Glutamine-Glutamate Cycle Flux Is Similar in Cultured Astrocytes and Brain and Both Glutamate Production and Oxidation Are Mainly Catalyzed by Aspartate Aminotransferase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epiphytic Terrestrial Algae (Trebouxia sp.) as a Biomarker Using the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) System

by
Asmida Ismail
1,*,
Sarah Diyana Marzuki
1,
Nordiana Bakti Mohd Yusof
1,
Faeiza Buyong
2,
Mohd Nizam Mohd Said
3,
Harinder Rai Sigh
1 and
Amyrul Rafiq Zulkifli
1
1
School of Biology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
2
School of Chemistry and Environment, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
3
School of Environmental and Natural Resources, Faculty of Science & Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2017, 6(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6010019
Submission received: 15 July 2016 / Revised: 28 February 2017 / Accepted: 28 February 2017 / Published: 7 March 2017

Abstract

:
The increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has caused significant environmental changes, particularly to the lower plants such as terrestrial algae and lichens that alter species composition, and therefore can contribute to changes in community landscape. A study to understand how increased CO2 in the atmosphere will affect algal density with minimal adjustment on its natural ecosystem, and the suitability of the algae to be considered as a biomarker, has been conducted. The current work was conducted in the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) system located in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia. CO2 was injected through special valves located along the ring surrounding specimen trees where 10 × 10 cm quadrats were placed. A total of 16 quadrats were randomly placed on the bark of 16 trees located inside the FACE system. This system will allow data collection on the effect of increased CO2 without interfering or changing other parameters of the surrounding environment such as the wind speed, wind direction, humidity, and temperature. The initial density Trebouxia sp. was pre-determined on 1 March 2015, and the final density was taken slightly over a year later, on 15 March 2016. The exposure period of 380 days shed some light in understanding the effect of CO2 on these non-complex, short life cycle lower plants. The results from this research work showed that the density of algae is significantly higher after 380 days exposure to the CO2-enriched environment, at 408.5 ± 38.5 × 104 cells/cm2, compared to the control site at 176.5 ± 6.9 × 104 cells/cm2 (independent t-test, p < 0.001). The distance between the trees and the injector valves is negatively correlated. Quadrats located in the center of the circular ring recorded lower algal density compared to the ones closer to the CO2 injector. Quadrat 16, which was nearing the end of the CO2 valve injector, showed an exceptionally high algal density—2-fold higher than the average density at 796 ± 38.5 × 104 cells/cm2. In contrast, Quadrat 9, which was located in the center of the ring (lower CO2 concentration), recorded only 277 ± 38.5 × 104 cells/cm2, which further supports the previous claim. Based on the data obtained, this study provides useful data in understanding the positive effect of CO2 on algal density, in a natural environment, and suggests the use of epiphytic terrestrial algae as a biomarker.

1. Introduction

Global warming and climate instability, as predicted, are critical and are currently one of the most discussed issues among scientists around the globe. It has been reported that the cause of these problems are directly associated with air pollutants, especially greenhouse gases that are concentrated in the atmosphere. Among pollutants, anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) is found to be one of the most important causes of the global warming and climate instability issue [1]. This is supported by a report released by the World Bank [2] stating that carbon dioxide (CO2) is responsible for 59% of greenhouse gases. Mass efforts are being made to discover methods to understand the elevated CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, and the problem is still unsolved. Therefore, a number of possible solutions have been suggested, and one of them is the use of microalgae. In Moreira’s and Pires’ study [3], microalgae were utilized to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. This is because algae are able to convert CO2 released into organic carbon through photosynthesis, which leads to the production of large amounts of biomass [4]. Despite the fact that algae may be used to reduce air pollution, there is paucity of literature on the mid- to long-term effect of CO2 on algae—whether they can adapt and survive in the CO2-rich environment for a certain period or if the CO2 conversion process can only take effect during short-term exposure. This paper will addresses the ability of epiphytic terrestrial algae as mid- to long-term biomarkers. Biomarkers are defined as quantitative measures of changes in the biological system that can be related to exposure to the toxic effects of environmental chemicals [5,6].
The Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) system is a method used by ecologists and plant biologists in a specified area to measure the effect of raised CO2 concentration in plant growth responses. Researchers believe that measuring the effect of elevated CO2 using FACE is a better way to estimate how plant growth will change in the future as the CO2 concentration rises in the atmosphere. Another benefit that FACE offers is that it allows the effect of elevated CO2 on plants that cannot be grown in small spaces, such as trees, to be measured. Epiphytic terrestrial algae are believed to grow better in habitats with higher CO2 concentration. They are known to have the ability to fix the CO2 3–5-fold more than typical trees and crops [7]. In areas with high pollution levels, the growth rate of algae is better, allowing for their colonization on the bark of trees to be highly visible. The aim of this study was to observe the mid-term changes of algal density in a CO2-enriched environment using the FACE system.
The objectives of this study are listed as follows:
(1)
to study the mid-term exposure of increased CO2 on changes in the density of epiphytic terrestrial algae using the FACE system;
(2)
to assess the relationship between algal density and the distance from the CO2 source.

2. Methodology

2.1. Site and Environmental Parameter Description

This research work was conducted in the custom-made Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) system (Figure 1) located in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, Malaysia. The system covers an area of 55 m2, consisting of plants of different species. The quadrats were placed on Barringtonia racemosa, a common tree found in Southeast Asia. This system is a unique way to observe the long-term effect of CO2 in an open laboratory environment, which also uses the same injection method. The parameters surrounding the environment are in the environments’ natural state, i.e., the parameters are not being changed in any way. The environmental parameters recorded were the wind speed, the wind direction, humidity, and temperature. This system allows other parameters to take place around it naturally while adjusting the level of CO2 according to the settings in the FACE system. Thus, this system allows researchers to study the effect of CO2 on plants and the living organisms in it without changing their natural conditions.
The features contained in the FACE system are Xbee wireless sensors, a sensor data sender, a CO2 scheduler, and a Real Time Clock (RTC) for a date and clock display and a sensor data timestamp. Xbee wireless sensors support four sensor nodes which measure the temperature, humidity, and CO2 (EZ sensor nodes) and 1 sensor node which measure the wind speed (WS sensor node). The sensor data sender relays the data to the server immediately after the data is received by SCP. The data will be stored at the Cloud server database and can be viewed remotely from desktops or android devices (Figure 2). The CO2 scheduler controls the opening and closing of the valves (where the CO2 are being injected) into the area.
In this system, the CO2 gas will be injected at one-hour intervals if wind speed is below 15 km/h. There are three valves available in the system. Valve 1 will be in operation for 5 min at the RTC hour, Valve 2 will be in operation for 5 min after 10 min at the RTC hour, and Valve 3 will be active for 5 min after 20 min at the RTC hour. Only one valve will be active at any given time. However, it can also be opened simultaneously using the manual push button. During the injection process, a buzzer will go off to indicate that the process is taking place. The date and time on the LCD can be set up using the menu and keypad.

2.2. Systematic Algal Collection and Quantification

Sixteen trees of the Barringtonia racemosa inside the FACE ring were randomly selected, and three quadrats measuring 10 × 10 cm each were placed on the bark of the trees. The experimental layout is illustrated as Figure 3. For the control group, a total of nine quadrats were placed on trees located on the opposite side of the predominant wind, 300 m away from the FACE system. The algal cells inside the quadrats, namely the Trebouxia sp., were swabbed to obtain the initial algal density on 1 March 2015. The algal swab contained a mixture of algal species, but since more than 95% are of Trebouxia sp., only this species was quantified. The algae in the quadrats were then exposed to the CO2 injection through the FACE system for 380 days while quadrats of the control group remained in their natural environment. The density of the algae after the exposure period was collected and quantified on 15 March 2016. The algae were swabbed using wet cotton wool before being stored in 60 mL sterile specimen tubes containing 30 mL of distilled water. The bottles were then stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C. The tube containing algae was shaken vigorously to detach clumpy cells for the quantification process. Ten μL of the sample liquid was then pipetted onto a hemocytometer, ready for algal cell quantification and cell observation under a digital light microscope at 40× magnification. The total of number of cells per mL was calculated using the following formula:
Total number of algal cells in a mL = number of cells counted/10 µL × 1.0 × 104 mL.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Density of Algae after CO2 Exposure

Figure 4 shows the density of the epiphytic terrestrial algae collected in both control and FACE sampling sites after 380 days of CO2 injection. Significantly higher density of epiphytic terrestrial algae was recorded inside the FACE system (408.5 ± 38.5 × 104 cells/cm2) as compared to the control site (176.5 ± 6.9 × 104 cells/cm2 (independent t-test, p < 0.001)).
This data implies that the epiphytic terrestrial algae density was affected by the presence of the injected CO2 gas molecules. The impact of the CO2 molecules on the growth of the epiphytic terrestrial algae is significant as the density of algae in the FACE system was somewhat double that of the control site. CO2 is found to be essential for algal photosynthetic activity. Packer [8] stated that algae absorb the extra CO2 present in the atmosphere due to CO2 injection, capturing it into its biomass and hence increasing in its growth. Besides that, increased external CO2 concentration steepens the diffusion gradient for photosynthetic uptake and has been shown to stimulate growth and development in hundreds of photosynthetic organisms [9]. Thus, the abundance CO2 gas available in the air allows more gas to be absorbed into the algal cells and used for the photosynthesis process. The mid-term exposure of acidic CO2 on the epiphytic terrestrial algae is more beneficial than it is harmful, according to the finding. This indicates that epiphytic terrestrial algae are not negatively affected by the mid-term exposure of acidic CO2, thus enabling them as a possible mid- to long-term biomarker. This finding was in agreement with previous studies conducted by other studies [10,11,12].

3.2. The Relationship between Algal Density and the Distance of CO2 Source

Figure 5a shows the density of epiphytic terrestrial algae collected in quadrats located in the FACE system. Based on the figure below, the density of the algae is not uniform throughout the quadrats. Bearing in mind that the FACE system works by taking into account the direction of the prevailing wind, the wind direction and other parameters are thus not being manipulated. Quadrat 16, which is located on the outer area closer to the CO2 injection, shows remarkably high algal density (796 ± 38.5 × 104 cells/cm2), while the quadrat with the lowest density was Quadrat 9 (farthest from the CO2 injection) with only 277 ± 38.5 × 104 cells/cm2. Quadrat 1, Quadrat 2, Quadrat 5, Quadrat 8, and Quadrat 10 showed significantly higher algal density compared to other quadrats. This can be best explained by the position of the quadrats in the FACE system (refer to Figure 3). Concurrently, quadrats with significantly higher algal density were located closer to the outer ring of the system; meanwhile, quadrats with lower algal density were positioned farther from the CO2 injection ring.
As the CO2 gas is injected and dispersed into the air, the quadrats near the ring have better access towards the gas compared to the quadrats placed in the center. In other words, the distance of the algae on the quadrats near the ring to the CO2 source is “shorter” compared to the algae on the quadrats in the middle. The short distance between the algae and the CO2 source has lower CO2 gas dispersal, causing the area to have a higher concentration of CO2 compared to the center of the ring where the algae are able to maximize their CO2 absorbance. Therefore, the higher CO2 absorbance rate increases the rate of photosynthesis of the algae and thus increases their growth. This study was in line with previous studies, which showed that algal density increased as the concentration of CO2 increased [13,14]. The findings collected in this research work prove that the distance between the quadrat and the CO2 source does play important roles in determining the density of algal cells.

4. Conclusions

The conclusion drawn from this study is epiphytic terrestrial algae, particularly of Trebouxia sp., can be considered a good mid- to long-term biomarker for rising CO2 concentration. This can be seen as CO2 considerably triggers higher algal density when the surrounding area contained high CO2 concentration. CO2, as one of the growth factors for epiphytic terrestrial algae, promotes algal growth, therefore supporting the hypothesis that shorter distances between algae and CO2 sources favor the algae.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank members of the Tropical Ecophysiology Research Group (UKM) and staff of the Phycology and Aquatic Plant Laboratory (UKM) for their assistance and guidance upon completing this project. This work was funded under PRI 100-RMI/PRI 16/6/2 (4/2015) and 600-RMI/FRGS 5/3 (145/2013) supported by Ministry of Education, Malaysia, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia and Yayasan Sime-Darby-UKM (ZF-2015-031).

Author Contributions

Asmida Ismail, Principal investigator who oversees the project and responsible in manuscript preparation and corrections; Sarah Diyana Marzuki and Nordiana Bakti Mohd Yusof, Postgraduate students who helped with data analyses; Faeiza Buyong, Senior lecturer in Environmental Technology who looks into the environmental aspects of the manuscript; Mohd Nizam Mohd Said, Professor and team member who initiates the FACE system; Harinder Rai Sigh, Senior lecturer who advises on the data analyses and proofread the manuscript; Amyrul Rafiq Zulkifli, Postgraduate student who carried out the field experiment, data construction and data analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heidari, H.; Katircioğlu, S.T.; Saeidpour, L. Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2015, 64, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Bank Group. The Little Green Data; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moreira, D.; Pires, J.C.M. Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: Negative carbon dioxide emission path. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Farrelly, D.J.; Everard, C.D.; Fagan, C.C.; McDonnell, K.P. Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 712–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Biomarkers and Risk Assessment: Concepts and Principles; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993; p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  6. Peakall, D.B.; Walker, C.H. The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (3). Vertebrates Ecotoxicol. 1994, 3, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bischoff, H.W.; Bold, H.C. Some soil algae from enchanted rock and related algae species. In Phycological Studies; University of Texas: Austin, TX, USA, 1963; Volume 44, pp. 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  8. Packer, M. Algal capture of carbon dioxide; biomass generation as a tool for greenhouse gas mitigation with reference to New Zealand energy strategy and policy. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 3428–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghannoum, O.; von Caemmerer, S.; Ziska, L.H.; Conroy, J.P. The growth response of C4 partial pressure: A reassessment. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Whitton, B.A.; Kelly, M.G. Use of algae and other plants for monitoring rivers. Aust. J. Ecol. 1995, 20, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, M.B.; Tripathi, R.D.; Rai, U.N.; Pal, A.; Siugh, S.P. Physico-chemical characteristics and pollution level of Lake Nainital (U.P. India): Role of macrophytes and phytoplankton in biomonitoring and phytoremediation of toxic metl ions. Chemosphere 1999, 39, 2171–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Volterra, L.; Conti, M.E. Algae as biomarkers, bioaccumulators and toxin producers. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 13, 92–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, X.; Gao, K. Characterization of diurnal photosynthetic rhythms in the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum grown in synchronous culture under ambient and elevated CO2. Funct. Plant Biol. 2004, 31, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, K.; Aruga, Y.; Asada, K.; Kiyohara, M. Influence of enhanced CO2 on growth and photosynthesis of the red algae Gracilaria sp. and G. chilensis. J. Appl. Phycol. 1993, 5, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Quadrats on trees in the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) system; inner (2 m, 400 ppm), middle (4 m, 440 ppm) and outer (5 m, 630 ppm). (b) Overall layout design of the FACE system.
Figure 1. (a) Quadrats on trees in the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) system; inner (2 m, 400 ppm), middle (4 m, 440 ppm) and outer (5 m, 630 ppm). (b) Overall layout design of the FACE system.
Biology 06 00019 g001
Figure 2. System block of the sensors and working diagram of the FACE.
Figure 2. System block of the sensors and working diagram of the FACE.
Biology 06 00019 g002
Figure 3. The position of 10 × 10 cm quadrats in the CO2 ring injection of the FACE system.
Figure 3. The position of 10 × 10 cm quadrats in the CO2 ring injection of the FACE system.
Biology 06 00019 g003
Figure 4. The density of Trebouxia sp. recorded from the control and FACE sampling sites after 380 days. Error bars represent standard error of means (SEM).
Figure 4. The density of Trebouxia sp. recorded from the control and FACE sampling sites after 380 days. Error bars represent standard error of means (SEM).
Biology 06 00019 g004
Figure 5. (a) Density of epiphytic terrestrial algae of 16 quadrats placed in the ring of the FACE system. (b) Mean algal density based on the distance and concentration from CO2 injection to quadrats placement. 2 m, inner = 400 ppm; middle, 4 m = 440 ppm; 5 m, outer = 600 ppm. All error bars represent standard error of means (SEM).
Figure 5. (a) Density of epiphytic terrestrial algae of 16 quadrats placed in the ring of the FACE system. (b) Mean algal density based on the distance and concentration from CO2 injection to quadrats placement. 2 m, inner = 400 ppm; middle, 4 m = 440 ppm; 5 m, outer = 600 ppm. All error bars represent standard error of means (SEM).
Biology 06 00019 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ismail, A.; Marzuki, S.D.; Mohd Yusof, N.B.; Buyong, F.; Mohd Said, M.N.; Sigh, H.R.; Zulkifli, A.R. Epiphytic Terrestrial Algae (Trebouxia sp.) as a Biomarker Using the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) System. Biology 2017, 6, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6010019

AMA Style

Ismail A, Marzuki SD, Mohd Yusof NB, Buyong F, Mohd Said MN, Sigh HR, Zulkifli AR. Epiphytic Terrestrial Algae (Trebouxia sp.) as a Biomarker Using the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) System. Biology. 2017; 6(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ismail, Asmida, Sarah Diyana Marzuki, Nordiana Bakti Mohd Yusof, Faeiza Buyong, Mohd Nizam Mohd Said, Harinder Rai Sigh, and Amyrul Rafiq Zulkifli. 2017. "Epiphytic Terrestrial Algae (Trebouxia sp.) as a Biomarker Using the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) System" Biology 6, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6010019

APA Style

Ismail, A., Marzuki, S. D., Mohd Yusof, N. B., Buyong, F., Mohd Said, M. N., Sigh, H. R., & Zulkifli, A. R. (2017). Epiphytic Terrestrial Algae (Trebouxia sp.) as a Biomarker Using the Free-Air-Carbon Dioxide-Enrichment (FACE) System. Biology, 6(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6010019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop