Next Article in Journal
MetaGaAP: A Novel Pipeline to Estimate Community Composition and Abundance from Non-Model Sequence Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Anaphase A: Disassembling Microtubules Move Chromosomes toward Spindle Poles
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Consequences of Chromosome Segregation Errors in Mitosis and Meiosis
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Biology 2017, 6(1), 13;

Mechanisms of Chromosome Congression during Mitosis

Chromosome Instability & Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde—i3S, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
Cell Division Group, Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Cell Division Laboratory, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: J. Richard McIntosh
Received: 1 October 2016 / Revised: 7 January 2017 / Accepted: 28 January 2017 / Published: 17 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Mitotic Chromosome Segregation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3964 KB, uploaded 17 February 2017]   |  


Chromosome congression during prometaphase culminates with the establishment of a metaphase plate, a hallmark of mitosis in metazoans. Classical views resulting from more than 100 years of research on this topic have attempted to explain chromosome congression based on the balance between opposing pulling and/or pushing forces that reach an equilibrium near the spindle equator. However, in mammalian cells, chromosome bi-orientation and force balance at kinetochores are not required for chromosome congression, whereas the mechanisms of chromosome congression are not necessarily involved in the maintenance of chromosome alignment after congression. Thus, chromosome congression and maintenance of alignment are determined by different principles. Moreover, it is now clear that not all chromosomes use the same mechanism for congressing to the spindle equator. Those chromosomes that are favorably positioned between both poles when the nuclear envelope breaks down use the so-called “direct congression” pathway in which chromosomes align after bi-orientation and the establishment of end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments. This favors the balanced action of kinetochore pulling forces and polar ejection forces along chromosome arms that drive chromosome oscillatory movements during and after congression. The other pathway, which we call “peripheral congression”, is independent of end-on kinetochore microtubule-attachments and relies on the dominant and coordinated action of the kinetochore motors Dynein and Centromere Protein E (CENP-E) that mediate the lateral transport of peripheral chromosomes along microtubules, first towards the poles and subsequently towards the equator. How the opposite polarities of kinetochore motors are regulated in space and time to drive congression of peripheral chromosomes only now starts to be understood. This appears to be regulated by position-dependent phosphorylation of both Dynein and CENP-E and by spindle microtubule diversity by means of tubulin post-translational modifications. This so-called “tubulin code” might work as a navigation system that selectively guides kinetochore motors with opposite polarities along specific spindle microtubule populations, ultimately leading to the congression of peripheral chromosomes. We propose an integrated model of chromosome congression in mammalian cells that depends essentially on the following parameters: (1) chromosome position relative to the spindle poles after nuclear envelope breakdown; (2) establishment of stable end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments and bi-orientation; (3) coordination between kinetochore- and arm-associated motors; and (4) spatial signatures associated with post-translational modifications of specific spindle microtubule populations. The physiological consequences of abnormal chromosome congression, as well as the therapeutic potential of inhibiting chromosome congression are also discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: mitosis; microtubule; kinetochore; mitotic spindle; polar ejection forces; Kinesin; Dynein; CENP-E; Chromokinesin; chromosome; tubulin code mitosis; microtubule; kinetochore; mitotic spindle; polar ejection forces; Kinesin; Dynein; CENP-E; Chromokinesin; chromosome; tubulin code

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Maiato, H.; Gomes, A.M.; Sousa, F.; Barisic, M. Mechanisms of Chromosome Congression during Mitosis. Biology 2017, 6, 13.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Biology EISSN 2079-7737 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top