Next Article in Journal
New Insights on Mitochondria-Targeted Neurological Drugs
Next Article in Special Issue
Unveiling Key Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk in Psoriasis Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Previous Article in Journal
Terpenoids Associated with the Resistance of Poplar to Canker Disease as Revealed by Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Analyses
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Graph-Based Deep Learning Framework with Gating and Omics-Linked Attention for Multi-Omics Integration and Biomarker Discovery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening Candidate Genes for Body Size Traits in Dongfeng Sika Deer Bucks Based on Genome-Wide Association Analysis

1
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China
2
Heilongjiang Academy of Land Reclamation Sciences, Harbin 150038, China
3
School of Life Sciences and Technology, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China
4
College of Animal Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
5
Inner Mongolia Genhe Forest Industry Co., Ltd., Genhe 022350, China
6
Daqing Municipal Agricultural and Rural Social Service Center, Daqing 163311, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2026, 15(3), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030227
Submission received: 27 December 2025 / Revised: 21 January 2026 / Accepted: 23 January 2026 / Published: 26 January 2026

Simple Summary

The aim of this study was to screen candidate genes associated with body size traits in Dongfeng sika deer stags by genome-wide association analysis. Sika deer is one of the most important deer species in China, and the body size trait directly affects its meat production performance and reproductive efficiency. However, research on body size traits of sika deer is still limited. To address this issue, we sequenced the whole genome of 266 adult Dongfeng sika deer stags and screened for genetic markers associated with nine body size traits by genome-wide association analysis. A total of 774 genetic loci with significant association with body size traits were detected, and four candidate genes that could positively regulate the development of body size were identified after further analysis. The results of this study provide new genetic markers and a theoretical basis for investigating the genetic mechanism of body size and meat production traits in sika deer, and provide an important reference for selecting and breeding better sika deer populations. Ultimately, this could help improve the economic benefits of deer farming through scientific breeding strategies.

Abstract

This study aimed to screen candidate genes related to body size traits in Dongfeng sika deer bucks by genome-wide association analysis. A total of 266 adult Dongfeng sika deer underwent 20× whole-genome resequencing. Genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) was performed using a mixed linear model (MLM), and gene annotation was conducted on SNP loci. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were subsequently conducted to identify biological functions and pathways associated with body size regulation. The GWAS results screened 774 SNP sites significantly associated with body size. Functional enrichment analysis further identified that four genes—CDH4, TSHR, SLC23A2, and RIMS1—were potentially associated with body size traits. This study provides a reference basis for subsequent functional exploration of candidate genes.

1. Background

The Sika deer (Cervus nippon) is a member of the class Mammalia, order Artiodactyla, family Cervidae, and genus Cervus. It is among the most abundant, diverse deer species in China, and represents one of the earliest domesticated deer in the country. In recognition of its genetic and economic importance, it was listed in the National Catalogue of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources in 2020 [1]. Over the years, extensive breeding programs have been carried out, including Shuangyang sika deer, Xifeng sika deer, Aodong sika deer, Siping sika deer, Xingkaihu sika deer, Dongfeng sika deer, Dongda sika deer, and Changbaishan sika deer, which have been cultivated [2]. Among these sika deer, the Dongfeng sika deer is characterized by its purebred status, stable genetic performance, good disease resistance, high tolerance, and excellent production performance [3]. In recent years, China has mainly focused on breeding antlered sika deer, while less research has been conducted on breeding meat sika deer. However, with the increasing use of livestock and the expansion of the venison market, interest in improving sika deer meat yield has grown substantially among breeders. As a major economic trait in the production of sika deer, genetic selection for body size is the main goal of meat sika deer breeding, and at the same time, body size has a direct relationship with productivity and fitness, which has a decisive impact on the efficiency of meat sika deer production.
The Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) approach is an effective tool for identifying genetic markers linked to economically important traits in plants and animals. By detecting marker loci associated with phenotypic variation, GWAS facilitates marker-assisted selection. This, in turn, enables the improvement of livestock breeds, enhancement of production performance, and optimization of economic efficiency. Currently, GWAS has become one of the most important tools for research in livestock population genetics and gene mining of economically important traits [4]. The Mixed Linear Model (MLM) in the GEMMA software (v0.98.5) can correct for both population structure and individual relatedness and reduce computational time. For instance, Li [5] identified 16 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci associated with four growth traits, including buck body weight, buck body height, doe body slant length, and doe hip height, and annotated 15 candidate genes influencing growth and body development. Excellent body size traits can improve livestock production performance. Excellent body size traits can improve the production performance of livestock and increase the economic benefits of farmers, and therefore have always been an important parameter in breeding work [6]. Despite its importance, research on body size traits in sika deer remains limited. To date, there have been few comprehensive studies aimed at screening genes associated with body size in this species. At present, research on sika deer mainly focuses on differentiation among sika deer, equids, and their hybrids [7,8], reproductive physiology [1], transcriptomic sequencing of genes involved in antler growth [9,10,11], and selection signals for reproductive traits [12]. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying body size variation in the Dongfeng sika deer remain largely unexplored, and systematic investigations at both quantitative and molecular genetic levels are still lacking. This study aims to identify SNPs and associated candidate genes significantly linked to body size traits in male Dongfeng sika deer through genome-wide association analysis. The aim of this study was to screen the SNP loci and candidate genes that were significantly associated with the body size trait of Dongfeng sika deer bucks by the MLM based on genome-wide association analysis, so as to provide a reference for the subsequent investigation of the function of the candidate genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Animals and Sample Collection

In 2024, we selected 266 five-year-old Dongfeng sika deer bucks from the Dongfeng County Dongfeng Sika Deer Seed Source Co. deer farm (Dongfeng, China). All selected animals were in good body condition and under consistent feeding management. A single surveyor used measuring rods and tape measures to take phenotypic measurements, including body height (HT), body length (BL), chest circumference (WS), chest depth (CC), head length (HL), frontal width (FW), pipe circumference (PC), tail length (WC), and antler shank distance (JB). All measurements were conducted and recorded in accordance with the “Technical Specification for Determination of Productive Performance of Antlered Deer” (NY/T1179-2006). Data points lying outside the range of the mean ± 3 standard deviations were treated as outliers and excluded prior to statistical analysis. Jugular blood samples were collected from each animal and stored at −80 °C for subsequent molecular analyses.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Library Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Sevin Biological Reagent Kit (model SD011, Sevenbio Innovation (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The purity and integrity of DNA samples were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the OD260/OD280 ratio, which ranged from 1.7 to 1.9. Qualified DNA samples were sent to the Smartgenomics Technology Institute (Tianjin, China) for sequencing. DNA was randomly fragmented to approximately 350 bp using a Covaris ultrasonicator (Covaris, LLC, Woburn, MA, USA). The resulting fragments underwent end-repair, A-tailing, adapter ligation, purification, and PCR amplification for library construction. After quality assessment, sequencing was performed according to the library’s effective concentration and data output requirements.

2.3. Genotype Quality Control and Principal Component Analysis

In the data preprocessing stage, the raw reads generated by sequencing were quality controlled using fastp (v0.20.0), with filtering criteria including: trimming of splice sequences, elimination of read pairs with a number of ambiguous bases (N) greater than 5 in single-ended reads, and elimination of read pairs with a percentage of low-quality bases (Q ≤ 15) greater than 40%. The post-QC Clean reads were compared to the reference genomes of homologous species using Senticon software (v202112) with default parameters, and sorted and de-weighted using Samtools. Based on the processed comparison results, Sentieon was used to perform initial screening for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the following criteria: sequencing depth support of not less than 4, comparison quality value of not less than 40, and genotype quality value of not less than 5.
Population-level genotypic data were rigorously filtered at multiple levels to obtain high-quality datasets for association analysis: genotypes with genotype quality values (GQ) greater than 20 and depth of coverage greater than 5 were retained; filtration was performed using PLINK (v1.90) to retain only bi-allelic loci. Loci with a missing-genotype rate exceeding 20% were removed, ensuring that at least 80% of the population was genotyped at each SNP. Variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.05, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) p-values greater than 1 × 10−6. Principal component analysis was performed using GCTA (1.94.1) software, and the first 2 principal components were used as covariates in subsequent association analyses to eliminate the effect of population structure on the analysis. After the above process, a total of 27,127,458 high-quality SNPs were considered for further analysis.

2.4. Genome-Wide Association Analysis

This study conducted genome-wide association analysis between body size traits and SNP loci of Dongfeng sika deer bucks, using the mixed linear model (MLM) in GEMMA v0.98.5. To account for potential confounding effects, population genetic structure was included as fixed effects in the model, while the kinship matrix among individuals served as random effects. The significance threshold was set at −log10(P) = 7.5. The mixed linear model used was:
y = + + + e
y is the phenotypic trait, X is the association matrix of fixed effect vectors, and α is the fixed effect vector; Z is the SNP genotype indicator variable, and β is the effect vector of SNPs; W is the design matrix of polygenic effect vectors, and μ is the microeffective polygenic effect vector obeying the normal distribution μ~N(0, Kσg2), where K is the genomic kinship matrix and σg2 is the additive genetic variance; e is the random residuals, obeying e~N(0, Iδe2), where I is the unit matrix and δe2 is the residual variance.

2.5. Multiple Testing Hypotheses

Significant SNP loci were identified using the Bonferroni correction method. Linkage disequilibrium pruning was performed on SNPs via PLINK to determine the number of independent markers (N). The threshold of significance at the genomic level was defined as 0.05/N, while the threshold of significance at the latent level was set at 1/N, with N being the total number of SNPs. In this study, the threshold was set at 7.5 (P = 1/N). The genome-wide significance threshold was set at 7.5 (P = 1/N), and significant loci associated with body size traits were selected.

2.6. Enrichment Analysis of Annotated Genes

The window was set to 100 kb, the step size was 10 kb, and the analysis was performed with a sliding 50% overlap region. The Fst values were sorted from largest to smallest, and the top 5% regions with a high degree of differentiation were used as strong candidate regions. Haplotype analysis was performed on the remaining variant loci, and the haplotypes were defined according to the linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern. After multiple comparisons of phenotypic values between different haplotypes, haplotypes whose genes exhibited significant variation were retained as the final candidate gene set. Candidate genes were annotated within a 0.1 Mb window upstream and downstream of significant SNP loci using ANNOVAR software (v20191024). Functional annotation and pathway enrichment analyses of these candidate genes were performed using the Metascape platform and the KOBAS online tool.

2.7. Data Statistics

Body size trait data were organized in Excel, the coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) was calculated, and the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 26.0.

3. Results

3.1. Measurement Statistics of Body Size Traits

Statistical analysis of body size traits in 266 Dongfeng sika deer bucks was conducted, and the results are shown in Table 1. Correlation analysis revealed the relationship between traits related to body size of 266 Dongfeng sika deer bucks, and the results are shown in Figure 1. The coefficients of variation for the measured traits ranged from 4.71% to 28.40%, with chest circumference exhibiting the highest coefficient of variation, indicating a wide phenotypic dispersion; head length also showed substantial variability and suggests greater potential for genetic improvement.

3.2. Results of Principal Component Analysis

The results of principal component analysis (PCA) are presented in Figure 2. Figure 2A indicates some stratification within the population. To determine the optimal number of principal components (PCs) to retain, we employed a combined approach using a scree plot and the Kaiser criterion. The scree plot (Figure 2B) exhibited a typical decreasing trend, with the first three PCs having eigenvalues of 2.42, 1.85, and 1.32. A clear inflection point was observed after the third PC. Cumulatively, these first three PCs explained 54.03% of the total variance, sufficiently capturing the major structure of the data. Therefore, the first three principal components were retained in this study for subsequent group structure analysis and GWAS covariate correction to eliminate the influence of group stratification effects on the results of correlation analysis and to improve the accuracy of the results.

3.3. GWAS Results of Body Size Traits of Dongfeng Sika Deer Bucks

The density map of SNP and principal component analysis distribution after quality control is presented in Figure 3. Genome-wide association analysis for 9 body size traits using the GEMMA model is shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, and selected SNP loci associated with these traits are summarized in Table 2. Detailed information on the SNPs associated with body length (BL) and the loci of SNPs associated with other body size traits are provided in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, respectively. After quality control of the genotyping data from the 266 Dongfeng sika deer bucks using PLINK v1.90, a total of 27,127,458 high-quality SNPs were retained for GWAS. A total of 774 significant SNP loci (−log10P = 7.5) were screened in the GWAS analysis of Dongfeng sika deer bucks. Chest circumference and head length had the highest number of associated loci, 664 and 94, respectively, and the number of significant loci for the rest of the traits ranged from 0–7, including 6 for body slant length, 1 for frontal breadth, 2 for tube circumference, and 7 for antler shank spacing, while no significant loci were found for body height, breast depth and tail length. In the gene annotation, some loci were not found within 100 kb upstream and downstream of mCerEla1.1 (annotated version Release 100) of the horse deer (Cervus elaphus) genome, and were labeled as none, whose functions need to be further investigated.

3.4. Functional Annotation of Candidate Genes

Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed on the candidate genes, and the results are presented in Figure 6, Table 3 and Table 4. The GO enrichment analysis showed that the candidate genes were enriched in three major categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). Among the significantly enriched GO terms, 10 were strongly associated with growth and developmental regulation. In particular, the CDH4, TSHR, SLC23A2, and RIMS1 genes are putative candidate genes derived from these enrichment results; these genes were annotated to be associated with the positive regulation of developmental and growth processes. The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis identified 15 signaling pathways, none of which reached the threshold for statistical significance (corrected p < 0.05). However, the MAPK signaling pathway was found to be enriched in the MAP3K20 gene, which has been reported to be involved in the regulation of growth and development [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], and this finding suggests that this pathway may be a potential direction that deserves in-depth validation in Merganseria spp. However, its specific role in this study is still speculative and needs to be confirmed by future expression analysis and functional experiments.

4. Discussion

The identification of candidate genes associated with economically important traits at the genome-wide level has become an important tool in animal breeding. Among available methods, selection signal detection provides an effective means to rapidly and accurately identify genomic regions under selection pressure and localize functional gene variants that may influence specific traits [20]. This approach ensures that genetic variations among populations and screen candidate genes for superior traits can be screened and identified. This will provide a lot of reliable basic data for the subsequent validation of candidate genes related to body size traits in sika deer.
GWAS plays an important role in the study of complex traits in plants and animals, especially in livestock and poultry breeding. Analyzing genetic diversity in livestock and poultry helps elucidate gene-trait relationships and underlying genetic architecture, enabling the effective identification of trait-associated SNPs and the localization of corresponding genomic regions [21,22]. Body size in livestock and poultry serves as a direct indicator of overall growth and development and correlates strongly with production performance, disease resistance, and the animals’ ability to adapt to environmental conditions [23]. Li [5] identified 16 SNP loci associated with four body size traits—buck body weight, buck body height, doe body slant length, and doe hip height—and annotated 15 candidate genes. In this preliminary study, a total of 774 SNP loci were identified as significantly associated with body size traits across nine phenotypic measurements in Dongfeng sika deer bucks. GO enrichment analysis revealed four candidate genes involved in the positive regulation of developmental and growth processes. Although no pathways reached the statistical significance threshold in the KEGG enrichment analysis, the MAPK signaling pathway, in which MAP3K20 was enriched, was notably associated with growth and development. This research differs from previous studies in that it enriches the genetic marker library and functional gene resources for a specific group of Dongfeng sika deer bucks, advancing from broad-spectrum exploration to precise, deep excavation, and Data support for further subsequent validation. Based on the identified genes (CDH4, TSHR, SLC23A2, RIMS1) and the MAPK pathway associated with MAP3K20, the results provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying body size regulation in sika deer. These findings align with known developmental pathways in other Artiodactyla species and can be echoed in the mechanism of body size regulation in Artiodactyls. Collectively, this study provides a basis for the future integration of genetic resources and the development of a breeding technology chain.
The CDH4 (Cadherin 4, calcineurin gene) was first isolated from chicken retina and identified as a retinal cadherin gene. As a member of the calmodulin family, CDH4, like other family members, functions in different tissue developmental and physiological processes by mediating calcium-dependent adhesion to cell surfaces. The functions of the cadherin family are evolutionarily conserved across species. In the nervous system, CDH2 and CDH4 expression accompany the development of neuronal synapses in the chicken brain [24]. In epithelial and reproductive tissues, the high concentration of calreticulin in bovine oviduct epithelial cells and gametes supports the conserved role of the calreticulin family in regulating physiological functions through cell–cell interactions [25]. In addition, CDH4 has been reported to regulate epithelial cell proliferation [26] and to play an important role in the embryonic and postnatal development of multiple tissues and organs [27]. Functionally, CDH4 is involved in cell adhesion and proliferation—processes critical for the development of body, skeletal, and other size-related tissues. Consistently, in our study, phenotypic variation among Dongfeng sika deer bucks, particularly in chest circumference and body slant length, likely stems from developmental differences in pectoral muscles and trunk bones. This alignment strongly supports the relevance of CDH4’s biological role to the observed traits. Furthermore, CDH4 was significantly enriched in the “positive regulation of growth” GO term in this study. Taken together, these observations suggest that CDH4 is a key candidate gene influencing body size traits in sika deer and may serve as a theoretical reference for understanding the molecular mechanisms governing growth and development in this species.
TSHR (thyrotropin receptor) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and belongs to the leucine-rich repeat subfamily (LGR family). It serves not only as a characteristic transmembrane receptor on the surface of thyroid follicular cells but also functions as a regulatory marker in adult stem cells, where it contributes to tissue growth and differentiation [28]. Its core function is to initiate the growth, proliferation, and differentiation of thyroid cells by binding TSH. This interaction activates phospholipase C and protein kinase A signaling cascades via the second messenger cAMP, establishing a regulatory axis of “receptor–signaling pathway–cellular response” that directly governs thyroid development and thyroid hormone synthesis [29,30]. The thyroid gland is a key regulator of growth and metabolism. It indirectly affects skeletal development and overall body size by controlling growth rate, neurodevelopment, and whole-body metabolism. These effects are closely linked to variations in body height and body length among Dongfeng sika deer bucks. Recent studies have shown that TSHR expression is not limited to thyroid cells but is also widely expressed in lymphocytes, adipocytes, myofibroblasts, and gonads [31,32] and that TSHR deficiency leads to severe growth retardation and intestinal dysplasia in mice [33]. This cross-species functional validation reinforces the extensive and indispensable functions of TSHR in regulating growth and tissue differentiation. It provides strong support for the hypothesis that TSHR influences body size traits in sika deer through a dual mechanism involving thyroid hormone regulation and synergistic expression across multiple tissues. Consequently, this study’s findings validate TSHR as a critical candidate gene for body size traits in sika deer and lay the foundation for future functional validation and molecular breeding strategies.
SLC23A2 (Solute Carrier Family 23 Member 2) encodes the sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 2 (SVCT2), which plays a crucial role in regulating the transport and utilization of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) within the body. SVCT2 is essential for maintaining vitamin C homeostasis in tissue cells and contributes to the modulation of several physiological and pathological processes [34]. Experimental deletion of SLC23A2 in mice leads to a marked reduction in SVCT2 expression in the brain, accompanied by downregulation of multiple associated proteins and brain-derived neurotrophic factors, and upregulation of Ionized Calcium Binding Adaptor Molecule 1 (Ibal). These alterations result in elevated oxidative stress and inflammation-related indices, including changes in glutathione levels and reduced vitamin C concentration in brain tissues. Such evidence indicates that SLC23A2 is indispensable for fetal brain development and provides a robust model for investigating the physiological functions of vitamin C in neural development [35]. These findings not only highlight the indispensable function of SLC23A2 in fetal brain maturation but also elucidate its broader regulatory mechanism operating through the “vitamin C transport–oxidative stress/inflammation modulation–tissue development” axis. Moreover, SLC23A2-mediated vitamin C transport appears to influence antioxidant equilibrium and myofibrillar protein synthesis within myoblasts. Therefore, the enrichment of SLC23A2 in the present study suggests its potential association with body size traits and can be further verified at the pathway and molecular levels, thereby providing a direction for exploring the specific mechanisms underlying the association between genes and traits.
RIMS1 (Regulating Synaptic Membrane Exocytosis 1) encodes a protein belonging to the RAS gene superfamily, primarily functioning in the regulation of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. This process is crucial for neurotransmitter release and underpins several neurophysiological activities, including modulation of voltage-gated calcium channels and regulation of long-term synaptic plasticity, thereby providing a multidimensional molecular basis for trait association. In terms of tissue-specific functions, the RIMS1 protein plays a vital role in retinal synapses by precisely modulating neurotransmitter release to ensure accurate transmission of light signals from photoreceptor cells to downstream neurons [36], underscoring the necessity of this gene for the maintenance of physiological functions in specific tissues. Studies have shown that while the brain structure of RIMS1-knockout mice appears normal under microscopy, these animals exhibit severe growth retardation and premature death [37]. Short et al. [38] also demonstrated that de novo mutations in RIMS1 were directly associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, revealing that they cause disease through, among other things, abnormalities in synaptic transmission and are associated with developmental delay. These findings collectively highlight the central role of RIMS1 in neuroregulation, growth, and overall development. The link between RIMS1 and animal body size may stem from its indirect effect on neuromuscular balance. This could involve regulating nutrient metabolism and muscle growth rate. This study’s finding that RIMS1 is associated with body size traits in Dongfeng sika deer bucks supports this idea. Therefore, these results provide compelling evidence for RIMS1 as a potential candidate gene linked to growth-related body measurements.
MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) is a serine/threonine protein kinase widely distributed in eukaryotic cells that can be activated by extracellular signals and regulates growth and body measurements through a tertiary signaling cascade of “MKKK–MKK–MAPK”. The classical MAPK pathways include JNK, p38 MAPK, and ERK, corresponding to the three core subfamilies of ERK, JNK/SAPK, and p38 MAPK in mammals, and are involved in inflammation, oxidative regulation, muscle development, and various disease processes [13,14,15,16,17,18]. MAP3K20 (also known as ZAK/MLTK) is a key upstream regulator of the MAPK signaling pathway [39,40]. It activates the JNK and p38 MAPK cascades by phosphorylating the downstream MEK and functions in a tissue-specific manner. In skeletal muscle, MAP3K20 promotes protein synthesis and myofibrillar growth through the PTEN/AKT and mTORC1 axes. Experimental evidence shows that muscle-specific knockdown of MAP3K20 leads to a marked decrease in skeletal muscle mass and strength in mice, whereas its overexpression protects muscle tissue from atrophy. Beyond its role in muscle biology, MAP3K20 is also implicated in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and regulating lipid metabolism [19]. In this study, enrichment analysis linked MAP3K20 and other MAPK pathway genes to body size traits in sika deer. Although the association identified by this study through enrichment analysis between MAP3K20, MAPK pathway signaling network-related genes, and the body size traits of sika deer did not reach statistical significance, prior evidence linking MAP3K20 and the MAPK pathway to growth and developmental processes suggests a biologically relevant relationship. Given the well-documented role of this pathway and MAP3K20 in animal growth and development [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], the presence of these elements in the enriched list not only highlights potential directions for further research but also implies that this pathway and its related genes may exert a functional role in the regulation of body size in sika deer. The lack of statistical significance may stem from the polygenic and micro-effect nature of body size traits, where the cumulative influence of numerous genes may not be sufficient to reach the genome-wide threshold. Moreover, MAP3K20, while a key upstream activator within the MAPK cascade, may indirectly influence body size through “signaling pathway–mediated tissue development,” thereby exerting a weaker effect than downstream effector genes that directly regulate growth. Other genes within the MAPK pathway may also exhibit small or non-significant effects, making it difficult for combined association signals from individual loci to surpass the statistical threshold. This study provides a reference for further exploring the mechanism of the MAPK pathway’s role in body ruler traits in sika deer.
Furthermore, the candidate genes identified through enrichment analysis include CDH4, TSHR, SLC23A2, and RIMS1, all of which are positive regulatory functions in growth and development. At present, no direct correlation between these candidate genes and the body size trait of sika deer has been reported; their known involvement in growth-related mechanisms in other species supports their potential biological relevance. Thus, these genes provide a valuable reference framework for subsequent functional validation studies aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying body size variation in this species.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 774 SNP loci significantly associated with 9 body size traits in Dongfeng sika deer bucks were identified by genome-wide association analysis. Four potential candidate genes, CDH4, TSHR, SLC23A2, and RIMS1, were screened by functional enrichment analysis for their positive regulatory functions in growth and development. This study provides a reference basis for subsequent functional exploration of candidate genes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology15030227/s1, Table S1: SNP information based on MLM analysis, associated with BL; Table S2: Loci of SNPs associated with some body size traits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang) and X.Z.; methodology, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang); software, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang); investigation, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang) and X.Z.; resources, L.Z., Z.Z., Y.Z. (Yao Zhao), W.Q., G.G., H.B. and H.H.; data curation, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang); writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang); writing—review and editing, Y.Z. (Yan Zhang) and X.Z.; L.Z., Z.Z., Y.Z. (Yao Zhao), W.Q., G.G., H.B., P.D. and H.H.; Visualization, H.H.; supervision, H.H.; project administration, L.Z., W.Q. and G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Beidahuang Group’s Seed Industry Innovation and Development Project (Grant No. 2022ZY0102-02-02), the Key Laboratory of Tarim Animal Husbandry Science and Technology Corps (Grant No. HS202501), and the Science and Technology Program of Inner Mongolia Sen Gong Group (Grant No. GSKJ-2023001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experiments and procedures were carried out following the Scientific and Technological Ethics Committee of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University (Approval No. DWKJXY2022085).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff at the deer farms for their assistance in animal management and sample collection. We are grateful to/thank Smartgenomics Technology Institute (Tianjin, China) for their help in sequencing and/or bioinformatics analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Guanghui Gai was employed by the company Inner Mongolia Genhe Forest Industry. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Du, P.Z.; Wang, J.Y.; Xu, D.Y.; Long, Y.T.; Han, H.S. Relationship between reproductive hormone levels and fecundity during timed insemination in sika deer. J. Econ. Zool. 2024, 28, 226–230+238. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wei, G.Q.; Xue, J.L.; Liu, S.X.; Duan, J.L.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.K. Conservation and utilization of germplasm resources of Sika deer in China. J. Jilin Agric. Univ. 2022, 44, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jian, B.Q.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Li, H.B.; Zhu, L.M.; Deng, X.D. Current situation of the development of sika deer industry in Dongfeng County and countermeasures and suggestions. Spec. Wild Econ. Anim. Plant Res. 2023, 45, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, F.H.; Gao, G.; Qian, Y.; Liu, L.N.; Zhu, H.J.; Qu, L.; Zhang, L. Genome-wide association analysis of fleece fineness traits in white velvet goats in northern Shaanxi. Chin. J. Anim. Sci. 2025, 61, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.D. Genome-Wide Selection of Body Weight and Other Traits in Sika Deer. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.; Duan, D.D.; Xue, Y.H.; Han, X.; Wang, K.J.; Qiao, R.M.; Li, X.L.; Li, X.J. An association study on imputed whole-genome resequencing from high-throughput sequencing data for body traits in crossbred pigs. Anim. Genet. 2022, 53, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fan, H.H.; Wang, T.J.; Dong, Y.M.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.T.; Xing, X.M. Validation of SNP molecular markers specific for horse deer. Chin. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2021, 48, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fan, H.H.; Wang, T.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.T.; Dong, Y.M.; Zhang, R.R.; Wang, H.L.; Shang, L.Y.; Xing, X.M. Development and validation of a 1 K sika deer (Cervus nippon) SNP Chip. BMC Genom. Data 2021, 22, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xing, H.H.; Guo, M.Y.; Han, R.B.; Zhang, F.R.; Li, H.P. Expression analysis of the MEF2C gene in the apical velvet skin tissue of Meihua antler at different growth stages. J. Econ. Zool. 2022, 26, 79–84, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, M.Y.; Han, R.B.; Xing, H.H.; Zhang, F.R.; Li, H.P. Gene cloning and expression analysis of KGF in the apical velvet skin tissue of Sika deer. J. China Agric. Univ. 2022, 27, 154–161. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun, J.Y.; Zhang, F.R.; Guo, M.Y.; Han, R.B.; Xia, Y.L.; Li, H.P. Differential DNA methylation of NGF gene in apical velvet skin tissues of Meihua deer antlers at different growth stages. J. Econ. Zool. 2022, 26, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, H.P. A Study on the method for calculating marginal benefits of breeding objective traits in Sika deer. For. Sci. 2006, 42, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  13. Farkhondeh, T.; Mehrpour, O.; Buhrmann, C.; Pourbagher-Shahri, A.M.; Shakibaei, M.; Samarghandian, S. Organophosphorus Compounds and MAPK Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, B. Exploring the Mechanism of Tension-Regulated Autophagy in Delaying Disc Degeneration Based on the MAPK/ERK/mTOR Pathway. Doctoral Dissertation, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.B. Regulation of Autophagy by mTOR Signaling Pathway. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1206, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, X.Y. Effects of Baicalin on ROS/MAPK Signaling Pathway Mediating Inflammatory Responses in Mouse Intestine and IPEC-J2 Cells. Master’s Thesis, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haque, M.A.; Jantan, I.; Harikrishnan, H.; Ghazalee, S. Standardized extract of Zingiber zerumbet suppresses LPS-induced pro-inflammatory responses through NF-kappaB, MAPK and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways in U937 macrophages. Phytomedicine 2019, 54, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brennan, C.M.; Emerson, C.P., Jr.; Owens, J.; Christoforou, N. p38 MAPKs—Roles in skeletal muscle physiology, disease mechanisms, and as potential therapeutic targets. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e149915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tang, P.; Virtue, S.; Goie, J.Y.G.; Png, C.W.; Guo, J.; Li, Y.; Jiao, H.; Chua, Y.L.; Campbell, M.; Moreno-Navarrete, J.M.; et al. Regulation of adipogenic differentiation and adipose tissue inflammation by interferon regulatory factor 3. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 3022–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, T.; Jin, M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, Z.; Wei, C. Whole-genome scanning for selection signatures reveals candidate genes associated with growth and tail length in sheep. Animals 2024, 14, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ma, L. 301 Methods of genome-wide association studies and their applications in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, J.; Gao, Z.; Lu, Y.; Li, M.; Hong, J.; Wu, J.; Wu, D.; Deng, W.; Xi, D.; Chong, Y. Application of GWAS and mGWAS in livestock and poultry breeding. Animals 2024, 14, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zheng, X.T. Determination of body weight and body size of newborn fawns of Northeastern red deer (Cervus nippon). Spec. Sci. Exp. (Spec. Sci. Exp.) 1984, 1+4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Inuzuka, H.; Redies, C.; Takeichi, M. Differential expression of R- and N-cadherin in neural and mesodermal tissues during early chicken development. Development 1991, 113, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Caballero, J.N.; Gervasi, M.G.; Veiga, M.F.; Dalvit, G.C.; Perez-Martínez, S.; Cetica, P.D.; Vazquez-Levin, M.H. Epithelial cadherin is present in bovine oviduct epithelial cells and gametes, and is involved in fertilization-related events. Theriogenology 2014, 81, 1189–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosenberg, P.; Esni, F.; Sjödin, A.; Larue, L.; Carlsson, L.; Gullberg, D.; Takeichi, M.; Kemler, R.; Semb, H. A potential role of R-cadherin in striated muscle formation. Dev. Biol. 1997, 187, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmitz, C.; Wacker, I.; Hutter, H. The Fat-like cadherin CDH-4 controls axon fasciculation, cell migration, and hypodermis and pharynx development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 2008, 316, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, H. Molecular Mechanism of TSHR (G558R) Mutation Regulating Heat Stress Response in Chickens. Master’s Thesis, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pierce, J.G.; Parsons, T.F. Glycoprotein hormones: Structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1981, 50, 465–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wilson, B.; Raghupathy, E.; Tonoue, T.; Tong, W. TSH-like actions of dibutyryl-cAMP on isolated bovine thyroid cells. Endocrinology 1968, 83, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Davies, T.; Marians, R.; Latif, R. The TSH receptor reveals itself. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abe, E.; Marians, R.C.; Yu, W.; Wu, X.B.; Ando, T.; Li, Y.; Iqbal, J.; Eldeiry, L.; Rajendren, G.; Blair, H.C.; et al. TSH is a negative regulator of skeletal remodeling. Cell 2003, 115, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peng, L.; Luan, S.; Shen, X.; Zhan, H.; Ge, Y.; Liang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhong, X.; et al. Thyroid hormone deprivation and TSH/TSHR signaling deficiency lead to central-associated intestinal dysplasia. Life Sci. 2024, 345, 122577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zanon-Moreno, V.; Ciancotti-Olivares, L.; Asencio, J.; Sanz, P.; Ortega-Azorin, C.; Pinazo-Duran, M.D.; Corella, D. Association between a SLC23A2 gene variation, plasma vitamin C levels, and risk of glaucoma in a Mediterranean population. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 2997–3004. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Cao, B.; Xia, Y.; Cai, Z.X.; Wang, Z.Y.; Tang, C.; Song, Y.H. Construction of a Brain-specific SLC23A2 Gene Knockout Mice Model. Neuroscience 2023, 524, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lazaro-Guevara, J.M.; Garrido-Lopez, K.M.; Soberanis, L.S.R.; Sandoval-Vargas, M.A.; Flores-Robles, B.J.; Téllez-Arreola, J.L. Discovery of a novel missense mutation in the RIMS1 gene potentially enhances the severity of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) caused by RP1 mutation in humans. Gene Rep. 2025, 39, 102156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castillo, P.E.; Schoch, S.; Schmitz, F.; Südhof, T.C.; Malenka, R.C. RIM1α is required for presynaptic long-term potentiation. Nature 2002, 415, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Short, P.J.; McRae, J.F.; Gallone, G.; Sifrim, A.; Won, H.; Geschwind, D.H.; Wright, C.F.; Firth, H.V.; FitzPatrick, D.R.; Barrett, J.C. De novo mutations in regulatory elements in neurodevelopmental disorders. Nature 2018, 555, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nordgaard, C.; Vind, A.C.; Stonadge, A.; Kjøbsted, R.; Snieckute, G.; Antas, P.; Blasius, M.; Reinert, M.S.; Del Val, A.M.; Bekker-Jensen, D.B.; et al. ZAKβ is activated by cellular compression and mediates contraction-induced MAP kinase signaling in skeletal muscle. EMBO J. 2022, 41, e111650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rey, C.; Faustin, B.; Mahouche, I.; Ruggieri, R.; Brulard, C.; Ichas, F.; Soubeyran, I.; Lartigue, L.; De Giorgi, F. The MAP3K ZAK, a novel modulator of ERK-dependent migration, is upregulated in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 2016, 35, 3190–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Matrix of body size traits of Dongfeng sika deer bucks: The color gradient corresponds to the strength and direction of the Pearson correlation coefficient (ranging from −0.27 to 1.0; red indicates a positive correlation, blue a negative correlation).
Figure 1. Matrix of body size traits of Dongfeng sika deer bucks: The color gradient corresponds to the strength and direction of the Pearson correlation coefficient (ranging from −0.27 to 1.0; red indicates a positive correlation, blue a negative correlation).
Biology 15 00227 g001
Figure 2. Principal component analysis: (A) principal component analysis. (B) Scree plot showing the eigenvalues (y-axis) of the first nine principal components (x-axis): number 1 to 9: body height (HT); body length (BL); chest circumference (WS); chest depth (CC); head length (HL); frontal width (FW); pipe circumference (PC); tail length; and antler shank distance (JB).
Figure 2. Principal component analysis: (A) principal component analysis. (B) Scree plot showing the eigenvalues (y-axis) of the first nine principal components (x-axis): number 1 to 9: body height (HT); body length (BL); chest circumference (WS); chest depth (CC); head length (HL); frontal width (FW); pipe circumference (PC); tail length; and antler shank distance (JB).
Biology 15 00227 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap of SNP distribution: The different colors in the right measurement represent the number of SNPs within the 0.1 Mb window size.
Figure 3. Heatmap of SNP distribution: The different colors in the right measurement represent the number of SNPs within the 0.1 Mb window size.
Biology 15 00227 g003
Figure 4. Dongfeng Sika Deer QQ Diagram: (A) body height (HT). (B) body length (BL). (C) chest circumference (WS). (D) chest depth (CC). (E) head length (HL). (F) frontal width (FW). (G) pipe circumference (PC). (H) tail length (WC). And (I) antler shank distance (JB). Blue dots in the figure represent SNP loci that do not reach the suggestive significance level, while red dots represent SNP loci that reach the suggestive significance level or genome-wide significance level.
Figure 4. Dongfeng Sika Deer QQ Diagram: (A) body height (HT). (B) body length (BL). (C) chest circumference (WS). (D) chest depth (CC). (E) head length (HL). (F) frontal width (FW). (G) pipe circumference (PC). (H) tail length (WC). And (I) antler shank distance (JB). Blue dots in the figure represent SNP loci that do not reach the suggestive significance level, while red dots represent SNP loci that reach the suggestive significance level or genome-wide significance level.
Biology 15 00227 g004
Figure 5. Manhattan plot of genome-wide association study: (A) body height (HT). (B) body length (BL). (C) chest circumference (WS). (D) chest depth (CC). (E) head length (HL). (F) frontal width (FW). (G) pipe circumference (PC). (H) tail length (WC). And (I) antler shank distance (JB), The black dashed line represents the genome-wide significance threshold after Bonferroni correction.
Figure 5. Manhattan plot of genome-wide association study: (A) body height (HT). (B) body length (BL). (C) chest circumference (WS). (D) chest depth (CC). (E) head length (HL). (F) frontal width (FW). (G) pipe circumference (PC). (H) tail length (WC). And (I) antler shank distance (JB), The black dashed line represents the genome-wide significance threshold after Bonferroni correction.
Biology 15 00227 g005aBiology 15 00227 g005bBiology 15 00227 g005c
Figure 6. Bubble plot of candidate genes enrichment analysis: (a) GO gene functional annotation. (b) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.
Figure 6. Bubble plot of candidate genes enrichment analysis: (a) GO gene functional annotation. (b) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.
Biology 15 00227 g006
Table 1. Statistics of Body Measurements.
Table 1. Statistics of Body Measurements.
TraitMaximumMinimumMeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of Variation (%)
Body Height, cm12192108.505.875.41
Body Length, cm12791105.674.984.71
Chest Circumference, cm1405797.1927.6028.40
Chest Depth, cm543947.133.086.54
Head Length, cm412130.763.1310.17
Frontal width, cm151012.981.199.16
Pipe Circumference, cm19.5910.700.817.57
Tail length, cm20615.422.0213.10
Antler shank distance, cm12710.080.979.60
Table 2. SNPs loci associated with the body size trait.
Table 2. SNPs loci associated with the body size trait.
TraitChromosomeLocation, bpGenotypep-ValueProximity Gene
Body HeightChr2937,719,498A/G7.32 × 10−24RIC1
Chr2551,359,020G/C7.00 × 10−24none
Body LengthChr2515,274,058G/C7.63 × 10−24LOC122684034, LOC122683960
Chr2712,003,186G/T7.82 × 10−24RTTN
Chest CircumferenceChr06105,298,383G/A24.53 × 10−23none
Chr0898,463,587G/A28.35 × 10−23none
Chr102,576,269C/T31.67 × 10−22LOC122702151
Chr136,800,873G/A26.68 × 10−23UBE3A, LOC122707019
Chr142,063,506A/G34.55 × 10−23LOC122708028
Chr2065,299,752A/C22.78 × 10−23S1PR1, OLFM3
Chr2455,874,319G/C42.92 × 10−23ERC2
Chr2453,493,952G/A23.62 × 10−23TRNAW-CCA, LOC122683393
Chr2452,547,833G/T22.82 × 10−23FHIT
Chr28852,575T/C20.38 × 10−23LOC122685417
Chr29716,609T/C24.64 × 10−23LOC122686330
Chr33149,895,086T/C22.81 × 10−23none
Chest DepthChr0518,303,189T/C6.70 × 10−23none
Chr209,754,766T/C7.45 × 10−23none
Head LengthChr142,063,506A/G10.37 × 10−23LOC122708028
Chr33149,895,086T/C10.84 × 10−22none
Chr2455,874,319G/C12.20 × 10−23ERC2
Chr2349,007,055G/A9.07 × 10−22BMP2, LOC122681619
Chr2631,522,038G/A9.46 × 10−23LOC122684220
Chr283,389,441G/T7.81 × 10−23LOC122685417
Chr3211,106,917T/C8.20 × 10−23LOC122688080
Chr102,576,269C/T8.97 × 10−23LOC122702151
Frontal WidthChr301,835,247C/T7.68 × 10−24LOC122686995
Pipe CircumferenceChr2441,986,106G/C7.78 × 10−24FOXP1
Chr2622,876,437C/T7.80 × 10−23ARFGEF3
Tail LengthChr0131,765,591T/A7.24 × 10−24none
Chr1180,720,780G/A7.34 × 10−24SLC8A1
Shank DistanceChr0370,147,010A/G7.89 × 10−24none
Chr2056,254,868A/G7.83 × 10−24LRIF1, LOC122676741
Chr2349,421,440A/G7.72 × 10−24TRNAW-CCA, LOC122681873
Table 3. GO-enriched pathways related to body size trait in Sika Deer.
Table 3. GO-enriched pathways related to body size trait in Sika Deer.
GO IDMolecular Functionp-ValueGene CountGeneForm
GO:0034330cell junction organization0.000110CHRNAL/CDH4/EPHA3/NRXN3/GABRA5/RIMA1/ADGRB3d/ERC2/CDH18/CDH26BP
GO:0050890cognition0.00067MME/NRXN3/SORCS3/GPR155/LINS1/GABRA5/ADGRB3BP
GO:0016239positive regulation of macroautophagy0.00583SPTLC2/TRIM13/SNX7BP
GO:0018108peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation0.00613AGTRLA/EPHA3/LRRK1BP
GO:0048639positive regulation of developmental growth0.00724CDH4/TSHR/SLC23A2/RIMS1BP
GO:0016342catenin complex0.00023CDH4/CDH18/CDH26CC
GO:0099634postsynaptic specialization membrane0.00085CHRNAL/SORCS3/GLRA3/GABRA5/ADGRB3CC
GO:0030695GTPase regulator activity0.00018GDI2/ARHGEF3/ARHGAP18/DOCK2/GOPC/ADGRB3/DENND6A/ARFGEF3MF
GO:0016758hexosyltransferase activity0.00464GBE1/AGL/POMT2/GALNTL6MF
GO:0008238exopeptidase activity0.00503MME/CTSZ/SCRN3MF
Table 4. KEGG enrichment pathway analysis results.
Table 4. KEGG enrichment pathway analysis results.
PathwayDatabaseInput NumberBackground Numberp-ValueCorrected p-ValueGene
Starch and sucrose metabolismKEGG PATHWAY1331.641.01GBE1
Propanoate metabolismKEGG PATHWAY1361.611.01HIBCH
Neuroactive ligand-receptor interactionKEGG PATHWAY23721.591.01GLRA3, CHRNA1
beta-Alanine metabolismKEGG PATHWAY1381.591.01HIBCH
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationKEGG PATHWAY1521.450.97HIBCH
Non-small cell lung cancerKEGG PATHWAY1661.350.96FHIT
Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosisKEGG PATHWAY1941.210.94DOCK2
Small cell lung cancerKEGG PATHWAY11001.180.94FHIT
Metabolic pathwaysKEGG PATHWAY315401.080.94HIBCH, GBE1, FHIT
Carbon metabolismKEGG PATHWAY11271.080.94HIBCH
Purine metabolismKEGG PATHWAY11411.040.94FHIT
Yersinia infectionKEGG PATHWAY11411.040.94WIPF1
Chemokine signaling pathwayKEGG PATHWAY11880.920.86DOCK2
EndocytosisKEGG PATHWAY12690.770.74WIPF1
MAPK signaling pathwayKEGG PATHWAY13050.730.73MAP3K20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Qian, W.; Gai, G.; Bai, H.; Du, P.; Han, H. Screening Candidate Genes for Body Size Traits in Dongfeng Sika Deer Bucks Based on Genome-Wide Association Analysis. Biology 2026, 15, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030227

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhao L, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Qian W, Gai G, Bai H, Du P, Han H. Screening Candidate Genes for Body Size Traits in Dongfeng Sika Deer Bucks Based on Genome-Wide Association Analysis. Biology. 2026; 15(3):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yan, Xinyuan Zhang, Lieping Zhao, Zhen Zhang, Yao Zhao, Wenxi Qian, Guanghui Gai, Huixin Bai, Peize Du, and Huansheng Han. 2026. "Screening Candidate Genes for Body Size Traits in Dongfeng Sika Deer Bucks Based on Genome-Wide Association Analysis" Biology 15, no. 3: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030227

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, L., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Qian, W., Gai, G., Bai, H., Du, P., & Han, H. (2026). Screening Candidate Genes for Body Size Traits in Dongfeng Sika Deer Bucks Based on Genome-Wide Association Analysis. Biology, 15(3), 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop