Next Article in Journal
Introduced Western Honeybees Dramatically Reduce the Abundance of Wild Bees in Alpine Meadows, Eastern Tibet Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
Phylogeography of Scarturus williamsi and Climate Change Impacts: Genetic Diversity and Projected Habitat Loss in Anatolia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Limitations of the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry Model in Estimating the Maximum Electron Transport Rate: Evidence from Four C3 Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Regulation of Light Absorption and Energy Dissipation in Sweet Sorghum Under Climate-Relevant CO2 and Temperature Conditions

1
Institute of Biotechnodogy, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
College of Safety Engineering and Emergency Management, Nantong Institute of Technology, Nantong 226002, China
3
Math & Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, China
4
School of Life Sciences, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
5
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Current address: New Quality Productivity Research Center, Guangdong ATV College of Performing Arts, Zhaoqing 526631, China.
Biology 2025, 14(9), 1185; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091185
Submission received: 23 June 2025 / Revised: 27 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 3 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Stress Physiology: A Trait Perspective)

Simple Summary

Climate change is driving increases in both atmospheric CO2 and temperature, posing challenges for plant growth and productivity. In this study, we examined how sweet sorghum, an important bioenergy crop, optimizes sunlight utilization under these future climatic conditions. Plants were cultivated under different combinations of CO2 concentration and temperature, and their light absorption and energy-use patterns were evaluated. We found that elevated CO2 enhanced light capture and improved its use for photosynthetic growth, whereas higher temperatures activated the plant’s protective mechanisms, enabling the safe dissipation of excess energy as heat. These coordinated strategies illustrate the inherent resilience of sweet sorghum. Our findings provide insights for the development of crop varieties capable of sustaining high yields and contributing to food and bioenergy security under climate change.

Abstract

Understanding how environmental factors regulate photosynthetic energy partitioning is crucial for enhancing crop resilience in future climates. This study investigated the light-response dynamics of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) leaves under combinations of CO2 concentrations (250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1) and temperatures (30 °C and 35 °C), using integrated chlorophyll fluorescence measurements and mechanistic photosynthesis modeling. Our results revealed that elevating CO2 from 250 to 550 μmol mol−1 significantly increased the maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) by up to 57%, and enhanced the effective light absorption cross-section (σ′ik) by 64% under high light and elevated temperature (35 °C), indicating improved photochemical efficiency and light-harvesting capability. Concurrently, these adjustments reduced PSII down-regulation. Increased temperature stimulated thermal dissipation, reflected in a rise in non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) by 0.13–0.26 units, accompanied by a reduction in the number of excited-state pigment molecules (Nk) by 20–33%. The strongly coordinated responses between quantum yield (ΦPSII) and σ′ik highlight a dynamic balance among photochemistry, heat dissipation, and fluorescence. These findings elucidate the synergistic photoprotective and energy-partitioning strategies that sweet sorghum employs under combined CO2 enrichment and heat stress, providing mechanistic insights for optimizing photosynthetic performance in C4 crops in a changing climate.

1. Introduction

Photosynthesis is a fundamental physiological process essential for biomass production in plants. It has been widely reported that 90–95% of crop yield derives from photosynthesis, with the remaining 5–10% relying on nutrient uptake through the root system [1,2]. The process begins with the absorption of light energy by light-harvesting pigment–protein complexes located on the thylakoid membranes within chloroplasts. When photons are absorbed, antenna pigments transition from the ground state to an excited state, an unstable condition that requires rapid energy dissipation [3]. Under normal physiological conditions, most of this excitation energy is transferred among chlorophyll molecules via resonance and ultimately reaches the reaction centers P680 (photosystem II, PSII) and P700 (photosystem I, PSI) [4,5]. Excited P680 initiates water splitting, leading to charge separation and triggering the electron transport chain to generate NADPH, together with ATP synthesis driven by the proton gradient. These energy carriers fuel CO2 fixation in the Calvin cycle.
However, not all absorbed light energy is utilized for photochemical reactions. Excited pigment molecules may also dissipate excess energy as heat or emit chlorophyll fluorescence [4,6]. The partitioning of excitation energy among photochemistry, fluorescence, and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) is dynamically regulated by environmental conditions such as light intensity [7], temperature, water availability, CO2 concentration [8], and nutrient status [9]. This flexible allocation is a key adaptive mechanism that allows plants to sustain efficient photosynthesis and avoid photodamage [7,10]. Light-harvesting pigment molecules are central to this regulation, functioning as the primary sensors of light stress [11]. Alterations in their functional state serve as early signals for photoprotective activation, ultimately determining the upper limits of light-use efficiency [5,12]. A detailed understanding of the absorption properties of these pigments is therefore essential for clarifying the dynamic regulation of excitation energy distribution, and has significant implications for improving photosynthetic efficiency and crop yield potential.
Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), a C4 graminaceous crop, is valued for its strong environmental adaptability and high stem sugar content, making it an important resource for bioenergy, animal feed, sugar production, and the food industry [13,14]. Its deep root system and tolerance to drought and salinity allow it to grow on marginal lands across Asia, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Major producers include China, India, the United States, Brazil, and several African nations. Sweet sorghum typically grows to 1.2–4 m in height and achieves stem yields of 47.4–52.1 t ha−1 year−1, juice extraction rates of 59–65.4%, juice sugar content of 16.1–19.5 °Brix, and grain yields of 1.8–5.0 t ha−1 [15]. According to FAO statistics, global sorghum production reached 57 million tons in 2023 [16], demonstrating its bioeconomic potential. However, the escalating impacts of climate change, particularly the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global temperatures, pose significant challenges to the photosynthetic capacity and growth dynamics of sweet sorghum. Despite its inherent C4 advantages under high light and temperature, prolonged exposure to combined CO2 enrichment and heat stress may disrupt photosynthetic enzyme systems, impair stomatal regulation, and alter carbon–nitrogen metabolism. These disruptions can ultimately affect growth duration, sugar accumulation, and yield stability.
Building upon our previous research, which characterized the leaf-scale gas exchange responses (net photosynthetic rate An, stomatal conductance gS, transpiration rate Tr, and water-use efficiency WUE) of sweet sorghum to varying light, CO2, and temperature [13], this study delves deeper into the underlying photobiological mechanisms. Our earlier work established how these environmental factors affect the overall carbon and water flux, but did not address the molecular-scale processes governing light energy absorption, transfer, and dissipation. Plants exposed to elevated CO2 and high-temperature conditions often experience reduced photochemical efficiency [8]. Although increased CO2 may enhance carbon assimilation, excessive heat stress destabilizes thylakoid membranes and disrupts electron transport [17]. This, combined with inhibited RuBisCO activity and reduced regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, decreases the consumption of energy equivalents (ATP and NADPH) within CO2 fixation [17,18]. As a result, plants must dissipate excess excitation energy and rely on alternative electron sinks to maintain redox balance and photoprotection. Light-harvesting pigment molecules respond dynamically to these abiotic stresses by modulating energy capture and allocation. For example, elevated CO2 can reduce chlorophyll content per unit leaf area in Oryza sativa L. [19] and decrease the intrinsic light absorption cross-section (σik) in Glycine max L. (Merr.) [20], thereby lowering the risk of over-excitation under strong light. Similarly, high temperatures accelerate reorganization of light-harvesting complexes, enhancing non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) via activation of the xanthophyll cycle and PsbS protein aggregation [12]. These adjustments minimize reactive oxygen species by channeling excess energy into heat dissipation while maintaining basal electron transport for carbon assimilation [18]. The capacity to dynamically adjust σik, NPQ, and excitation lifetime is thus essential for maintaining stable photosynthesis under fluctuating environments. Yet, quantitative characterization of these mechanisms in C4 species remains limited.
Chlorophyll fluorescence techniques provide a non-invasive, sensitive, and real-time method for assessing the photosynthetic status of plants under environmental stress [4,6]. In this study, a LI-6800 portable photosynthesis system equipped with a fluorescence chamber was used to measure light response curves of the electron transport rate (J), the effective quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII), and NPQ in sweet sorghum leaves under various combinations of CO2 concentration and temperature. By integrating these datasets with leaf chlorophyll content and applying photosynthetic mechanistic models developed by Ye et al. [21], we quantified key molecular-scale parameters, including the total number of antenna pigment molecules in the measured leaf (N0), their eigen-absorption cross-section (σik), the minimum average excited-state lifetime (τmin), effective light energy absorption cross-section (σ′ik), and the number of excited-state pigment molecules (Nk). The aim of this study was to clarify how environmental factors regulate excitation energy capture and transfer in sweet sorghum, and to reveal its light-response dynamics under climate-relevant CO2 and heat stress conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Seedlings of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench, KFJT-1) were propagated following methods established in earlier work [13]. After germination, the seedlings were relocated to plastic containers and cultivated in a growth chamber (RDN-1000E-4, Ningbo Dongnan Instrument Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China) under controlled environmental conditions. These conditions included a light intensity of 350 μmol photons m−2 s−1, a consistent temperature of 25 °C, and a photoperiod of 16 h of light followed by 8 h of darkness. When seedlings developed eight fully expanded leaves, uniformly growing, healthy plants were selected for subsequent measurements.

2.2. Light Response Measurement

Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured using an LI-6800 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) equipped with a LI-6800-01A fluorometer chamber. Measurements were conducted on clear days between 8:30–11:30 AM and 2:00–5:30 PM using automated protocols. Leaves were carefully clamped in the chamber and exposed to 1800 μmol photons m−2 s−1 photon flux density (I) for 40 min to activate photosynthetic enzymes. The light response was then determined by stepwise decreases in irradiance, starting at 2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and progressing through 1800, 1600, 1400, 1200, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 150, 100, 50, 25, and finally 0 μmol photons m−2 s−1. At each irradiance level, data were recorded after 2–3 min of stabilization. To ensure accuracy, the system automatically calibrated the reference and sample chambers before recording. Measurements were carried out under two leaf temperatures (30 °C and 35 °C) to simulate normal and heat-stress conditions associated with climate change. CO2 concentrations in the chamber were set to 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1, supplied from an external gas cylinder through the injection module. The mixed-gas flow rate was regulated at 500 μmol s−1 by the LI-6800 system. Each measurement was performed in triplicate to minimize variability and ensure data reliability. After completion, the same leaves were collected for chlorophyll quantification.

2.3. Chlorophyll Quantification

For pigment analysis, a 1 cm2 section from the previously measured leaf area was excised, weighed, and chopped into approximately 1 mm2 fragments. Samples were immersed in 5 mL of 80% acetone within sealed test tubes and kept in darkness at low temperature for 24 h to ensure complete extraction, aided by gentle intermittent shaking. After decolorization, the mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min to obtain a clear supernatant. Chlorophyll concentration per leaf area unit (mg m−2) was calculated from absorbance readings at 663 nm and 645 nm according to Wellburn’s method [22].

2.4. Model Fitting and Computational Analysis

2.4.1. JI Mechanistic Model

Ye et al. [21] proposed a mechanistic framework for modeling the JI relationship, providing a biophysically grounded alternative to empirical models such as the negative exponential and non-rectangular hyperbolic functions [23].
This model describes the sequence of events in photosynthesis—from light capture through energy transfer—based on the properties of pigment–protein complexes. The governing equation is:
J = α e 1 β e I 1 + γ e I I  
where αe denotes the initial slope of the JI curve, while βe and γe are parameters accounting for biophysical interactions, including the degeneration of energy levels in photosynthetic pigments (ground and excited states), the occupation probabilities of photochemistry, heat loss, and fluorescence emission, and the rates of photochemical efficiency and heat dissipation. The model is implemented in the Photosynthesis Model Simulation Software (PMSS, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an, China) (http://www.zipiao.tech/, in Chinese/English version, accessed on 11 August 2024) to fit experimental JI data and extract parameter estimates.
By integrating leaf chlorophyll content into the JI model, we can estimate additional pigment-related traits, including the total number of pigment molecules per leaf (N0), their eigen-absorption cross-section (σik), and the minimum average excited-state lifetime (τmin) [24].
The saturation light intensity (Isat) is derived by setting the first derivative of Equation (1) to zero:
I s a t = ( β e + γ e ) β e 1 γ e  
Subsequently, the maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) can be calculated as:
J m a x = α e β e + γ e β e γ e 2  

2.4.2. Mechanistic Models for ΦPSII, σ′ik, and Nk

ΦPSII reflects the efficiency with which absorbed photons are converted into chemical energy. Building on the link between J and ΦPSII, Yang et al. [23] developed mechanistic models for ΦPSII, the effective light energy absorption cross-section of antenna pigment molecules (σ′ik), and the number of excited-state pigment molecules (Nk) as functions of I. These relationships are defined as follows:
Φ P S I I = Φ P S I I m a x 1 β e 1 I 1 + γ e 1 I  
where Φ P S I I m a x = α e α β , with α = 0.5 representing the partitioning of absorbed light between PSII and PSI [25], and β = 0.84 the assumed leaf absorptance [26]. When I = 0 μmol photons m−2 s−1, βe1 and γe1 equal βe and γe in Equation (1), and ΦPSII = ΦPSIImax. However, their values differ when I > 0. Equation (4) incorporates the quantitative relationship between ΦPSII and the intrinsic characteristics of light-harvesting pigment molecules [23].
Light absorption efficiency per unit pigment, σ′ik, varies with light intensity as:
σ ik = 1 β e I 1 + γ e I σ ik  
Combining Equations (4) and (5) gives:
Φ P S I I = Φ P S I I m a x σ ik σ ik  
Under stable environmental conditions and fixed species traits, ΦPSII shows a direct proportionality to σ′ik.
Meanwhile, Ye [24] proposed that, at any given I, the total pigment pool (N0) is partitioned into excited-state (Nk) and ground-state pigments (Ni):
N k =   1 1 g i g k β e I 1 + γ e I N 0  
and
N i = ( 1 1 1 g i g k β e I 1 + γ e I ) N 0  
These equations illustrate that both Nk and Ni dynamically respond to light intensity. As I increases, Nk rises while Ni decreases, indicating a reciprocal relationship. In complete darkness (I = 0), all pigment molecules remain in the ground state (Nk= 0, Ni = N0).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All parameters are reported as means ± SE from three biological replicates. Two-way ANOVA was used to test treatment effects, and paired-sample t-tests (p < 0.05) were applied to compare model outputs with observed data. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2) obtained from SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. J–I Response Curves Under Different CO2 and Temperature Conditions

The electron transport rate (J) in sweet sorghum leaves exhibited typical light-response patterns under all six combinations of ambient CO2 and temperature (Figure 1). J increased rapidly with rising I before reaching a plateau at high light. At 30 °C (Figure 1A,B), the J–I curves under low (250 μmol mol−1) and ambient CO2 (410 μmol mol−1) were similar, with no significant increase in J. In contrast, elevated CO2 (550 μmol mol−1) significantly increased J across the irradiance gradient (Figure 1C), resulting in higher Jmax and Ie-sat values (Table 1). At 35 °C (Figure 1D–F), J increased progressively with CO2 enrichment, and the J–I curves shifted upward. Under low CO2 (250 μmol mol−1), a slight decline in J was observed beyond light saturation at both temperatures (Figure 1A,D), indicating PSII dynamic down-regulation. However, this decline was absent under elevated CO2 (Figure 1C,F), suggesting that high CO2 mitigates photoinhibition and improves electron transport capacity under heat stress. Model-simulated Jmax and Ie-sat closely matched measured data (R2 > 0.997), with no significant differences between fitted and observed values (p > 0.05).
Table 1 quantitatively confirms these trends. At 30 °C, Jmax rose from 133.63 ± 3.30 μmol electrons m−2 s−1 (250 μmol mol−1 CO2) to 184.82 ± 5.49 μmol electrons m−2 s−1 (550 μmol mol−1 CO2). Similarly, Ie-sat increased from 1280.03 ± 48.99 μmol photons m−2 s−1 to 1800.00 ± 0.00 μmol photons m−2 s−1, demonstrating enhanced light utilization under elevated CO2. At 35 °C, Jmax increased from 142.20 ± 1.92 mol electrons m−2 s−1 to 223.57 ± 5.06 μmol electrons m−2 s−1 across the same CO2 gradient, while Ie-sat rose from 1400.02 ± 63.24 μmol photons m−2 s−1 to 2000.00 ± 0.00 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Integration of chlorophyll content data (425.90 ± 1.67 mg m−2) into the JI model revealed a decline in the eigen-absorption cross-section (σik) with rising CO2, especially at 35 °C (from 2.58 ± 0.05 × 10−21 m2 to 2.16 ± 0.09 × 10−21 m2). This suggests down-regulation of pigment light absorption to prevent over-excitation. The minimum excited-state lifetime (τmin) also decreased significantly, implying faster energy dissipation and turnover. In line with these changes, the number of pigment molecules per unit area (N0) decreased with elevated CO2, particularly under heat stress.

3.2. ΦPSII–I Response Curves Under Different CO2 and Temperature Conditions

As shown in Figure 2, ΦPSII decreased non-linearly with increasing I. The mechanistic model reproduced the observed PSII–I responses well, although some deviations occurred at maximum ΦPSIIPSIImax) (Table 1). Temperature exerted minimal influence on the light response of ΦPSII. At a fixed CO2, ΦPSIII curves at 30 °C and 35 °C were nearly identical, with similar ΦPSIImax values (Table 1). In contrast, CO2 enrichment strongly enhanced ΦPSII at all light levels. At low CO2 (250 μmol mol−1), ΦPSII dropped rapidly as I increased (Figure 2A,D). With increasing CO2, this decline slowed markedly (Figure 2B,E). At 550 μmol mol−1 CO2, ΦPSII remained above 0.2 even at 2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (Figure 2C,F), indicating sustained PSII functionality under high light and elevated CO2.

3.3. σ′ik–I Response Curves Under Different CO2 and Temperature Conditions

Antenna pigment molecules absorb incoming light and transition into higher energy states. The effective absorption cross-section of antenna pigments (σ′ik) quantifies their photon-capturing efficiency under varying irradiances. As shown in Figure 3, σ′ik in sweet sorghum decreased steadily with increasing I.
The σ′ikI curves exhibited similar trends to the ΦPSIII curves (Figure 2A–F), indicating a strong correlation between light absorption and photosynthetic efficiency. Elevated temperatures significantly increased σ′ik, especially under ambient (Figure 3E) and high (Figure 3F) CO2 conditions. For example, at 1800 μmol photons m−2 s−1, the temperature-induced increase in σ′ik was only 4.5% at 250 μmol mol−1 CO2, but reached 33.8% and 21.1% at 410 μmol mol−1 and 550 μmol mol−1 CO2, respectively. CO2 enrichment also altered the response pattern of σ′ik to I. At 250 and 410 μmol mol−1 CO2, σ′ik decreased non-linearly with I (Figure 3A,B,D,E). In contrast, at 550 μmol mol−1, σ′ik showed approximately linear decline (Figure 3C,F). Overall, raising CO2 from 250 to 550 μmol mol−1 increased σ′ik by 41.8% at 30 °C and 64.3% at 35 °C under high irradiance of 1800 μmol photons m−2 s−1.

3.4. NPQ–I and Nk–I Response Curves Under Different CO2 and Temperature Conditions

Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) functions as a key photoprotective mechanism that prevents photooxidative damage by dissipating excess excitation energy as heat. As shown in Figure 4, NPQ increased non-linearly with irradiance and approached saturation under high light across all treatments.
Elevated temperatures significantly enhanced NPQ. CO2 concentration exerted a dual effect. NPQ decreased when CO2 increased from 250 to 410 μmol mol−1, but rose again as CO2 was further elevated to 550 μmol mol−1. For instance, at 1800 μmol m−2 s−1, increasing CO2 from 250 to 410 μmol mol−1 reduced NPQ by 0.05 (30 °C) and 0.06 (35 °C) (Figure 4A,B,D,E). Conversely, elevating CO2 from 410 to 550 μmol mol−1 increased NPQ by 0.06 (30 °C) and 0.19 (35 °C) (Figure 4B,C,E,F).
NPQ is closely linked to the de-excitation of pigment molecules in the excited state (Nk). Figure 5 presents the NkI curves. Under low CO2 (250 μmol mol−1), Nk increased non-linearly with I at two temperatures (Figure 5D). Raising CO2 from 250 to 410 μmol mol−1 had little effect at 30 °C (Figure 5A,B), but at 35 °C, Nk decreased significantly, showing an almost linear increase with I (Figure 5D,E). This trend became more pronounced at 550 μmol mol−1 CO2 (Figure 5C,F). Overall, both elevated temperature and CO2 significantly reduced Nk. At 1800 μmol photons m−2 s−1, increasing CO2 from 410 to 550 μmol mol−1 lowered Nk by about 33% at 30 °C and ~20% at 35 °C, indicating enhanced dissipation of excitation energy under these conditions.

4. Discussion

This study extends our previous work on sweet sorghum, which characterized leaf-scale gas exchange responses (e.g., An, gs, and WUE) to light, CO2, and temperature [13]. Here, by integrating chlorophyll fluorescence with a mechanistic biophysical model, we elucidated the molecular-scale mechanisms underlying those leaf-level responses. Our findings reveal how sweet sorghum coordinates CO2 availability, temperature, and irradiance to sustain photosynthetic function, thereby providing a mechanistic explanation for previously observed physiological patterns.

4.1. Regulation of Electron Transport and Light Utilization

Previous studies have shown that elevated CO2 enhances photosynthetic rates in C4 plants by improving phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPcase) efficiency and reducing photorespiratory losses [8,27,28]. Sales et al. [27], for instance, reported increased Jmax in maize and sorghum under elevated CO2, though they did not quantify changes in light-saturation dynamics. Our results confirm and extend these findings. Elevated CO2 not only boosted Jmax (by 57% at 35 °C) but also increased the saturation irradiance (Ie-sat), thereby improving the capacity to exploit high irradiance efficiently. This led to greater consumption of ATP and NADPH in carbon assimilation, consistent with the observed increase in Jmax (223.57 ± 5.06 μmol electrons m−2 s−1 at 35 °C/550 μmol mol−1 CO2 vs. 142.20 ± 1.92 μmol electrons m−2 s−1 at 35 °C/250 μmol mol−1 CO2).
Dynamic down-regulation of PSII is an adaptive reduction in photochemical efficiency triggered by supra-saturating irradiance, mediated largely through energy-dependent quenching (qE) and sustained NPQ [29,30]. This mechanism protects the electron transport chain by dissipating excess energy and maintaining redox balance [31]. In our study, photoinhibition and PSII down-regulation were pronounced under low CO2, but were strongly suppressed under elevated CO2. Although high temperature typically disrupts the electron transport chain and induces redox imbalance, particularly under combined high light and heat stress [18,32], our results indicate that elevated CO2 partially alleviates this inhibition at 35 °C. Specifically, the upward shift in the J–I curve and sustained J under high CO2 suggest improved plastoquinone (PQ) turnover and redox balance, delaying photoinhibition. The significant increase in Jmax under elevated CO2, even at 35 °C, reflects enhanced consumption of ATP and NADPH by the Calvin cycle. This increased metabolic demand likely prevents over-reduction of electron carriers such as the PQ pool and ferredoxin by providing an efficient sink for photosynthetic products. In contrast, elevated temperature alone intensified excitation pressure, as evidenced by increased NPQ and decreased Nk in the present study. However, the synergistic effect between high CO2 and temperature appeared to mitigate this effect through stimulated carbon assimilation, which consumed more reductants and helped maintain linear electron flow. Thus, sweet sorghum appears to exploit elevated CO2 to stabilize electron transport and counteract heat-induced stress, reducing reliance on photoprotective energy dissipation.

4.2. Regulation of Excitation Energy Allocation and Photoprotection via Antenna Pigment Dynamics

Our findings demonstrate that elevated CO2 and temperature significantly alter antenna pigment behavior, leading to improved regulation of excitation energy. Specifically, the eigen-absorption cross-section (σik) and minimum excited-state lifetime (τmin) decreased under elevated CO2, suggesting faster excitation turnover and reduced risk of over-excitation—consistent with previous findings in Glycine max [20].
Importantly, the mechanistic model employed in this study allowed in vivo quantification of the effective light absorption cross-section (σ′ik), providing a direct link to the efficiency of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII). Unlike empirical models [33,34,35,36,37], our approach reveals that ΦPSII and σ′ik exhibit strong co-regulation. CO2 enrichment significantly increased σ′ik—by up to 64% under high light and temperature—and maintained ΦPSII above 0.2 even at 2000 µmol m−2 s−1. These results support the view that elevated CO2 enhances excitation energy capture per pigment molecule, potentially through improved antenna organization and reduced exciton loss [12,38,39].
Elevated temperature also amplified σ′ik, especially under ambient and high CO2 (e.g., a 33.8% rise at 410 μmol mol−1 CO2), suggesting thermally induced reorganization of antenna complexes. Declines in ΦPSII with irradiance paralleled reductions in σ′ik, reflecting a dynamic trade-off between photochemistry, thermal dissipation, and fluorescence. Recent spectroscopic work by Leiger et al. [40] reinforces this interpretation, demonstrating that the red-tail absorption of chlorophyll a—linked to the Qy transition—is thermally activated and diminishes under cooling, implying that pigment optical properties are highly sensitive to vibrational coupling and protein–environment interactions. This supports the idea that elevated temperature modulates σ′ik through altered vibronic states, thereby enhancing energy dissipation capacity.
In addition, NPQ was enhanced by both rising temperature and CO2. For instance, at 35 °C, NPQ increased by 0.19 units when CO2 rose from 410 to 550 μmol mol−1, suggesting a CO2-enhanced non-radiative energy dissipation under heat stress. This pattern aligns with previous findings that thermal and pH shifts promote NPQ through activation of the xanthophyll cycle and conformational changes in LHCII–PsbS complexes [12,41]. In addition, our study contributes a novel mechanistic insight by quantifying Nk, the number of pigment molecules in the excited state. Nk serves as a key indicator of excitation pressure, determining the allocation of energy between photochemical quenching and photoprotective dissipation pathways [21,42]. This often-overlooked parameter decreased significantly under elevated CO2 and temperature—by approximately 33% at 30 °C and 20% at 35 °C—establishing a strong inverse relationship with NPQ. These results support the hypothesis that the dissipation of excess excitation energy via NPQ originates from the deactivation of excited pigment states, thereby lowering ROS risk and safeguarding PSII under stress [41].
Together, these pigment-level adjustments highlight a finely tuned regulatory system in which sweet sorghum modulates excitation energy allocation in response to CO2 and thermal conditions, balancing carbon fixation with dynamic photoprotection. This finely tuned regulation at the molecular level contributes to the crop’s robust adaptation to climate-related stresses.

4.3. Implications for Climate Resilience in C4 Crops

Our findings underscore the plasticity of sweet sorghum’s photosynthetic machinery in adjusting to simultaneous CO2 and temperature stress. The combined enhancements in Jmax, σ′ik, and NPQ, along with reductions in Nk, illustrate how the species dynamically balances energy use and dissipation. This plasticity has important breeding implications. Selection for genotypes that maintain high σ′ik and stable ΦPSII under heat and CO2 enrichment may improve resilience and yield. Moreover, the mechanistic parameters identified here (σ′ik, Nk, τmin) can serve as physiological markers in high-throughput phenotyping pipelines. However, it is important to note that the responses reported in this study reflect short-term acclimation to sudden changes in CO2 and temperature, as the plants were not pre-adapted to these stress conditions. While these immediate mechanistic responses are highly informative for understanding the initial biophysical adjustments of photosynthesis, they may differ from long-term adaptations that involve changes in gene expression, leaf morphology, and nutrient allocation. For instance, long-term exposure to elevated CO2 can lead to photosynthetic acclimation via carbohydrate accumulation and nitrogen dilution [14]. Therefore, field studies employing Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) or open-top chambers are essential to validate these mechanisms under realistic conditions where plants undergo full developmental and biochemical acclimation over seasons. The integration of this mechanistic model with canopy-level photosynthesis and crop growth models could greatly enhance our ability to predict crop performance under variable climate scenarios.

5. Conclusions

This study provides quantitative evidence that sweet sorghum actively modulates its photosynthetic light-use strategy under conditions of elevated CO2 and temperature. Through mechanistic modeling, we demonstrated that elevated CO2 enhances effective light absorption capacity (σ′ik) and electron transport rate (Jmax), while high temperature activates photoprotective mechanisms such as NPQ, accompanied by a reduction in excited-state pigment pool size (Nk). These coordinated adjustments stabilize PSII efficiency (ΦPSII) under high irradiance, thereby minimizing photoinhibition and strengthening photosynthetic resilience. The tight coupling between ΦPSII and σ′ik underscores a fine-tuned regulatory mechanism that balances light harvesting with energy dissipation. Our findings also highlight the utility of mechanistic models for deciphering biophysical responses of C4 crops to combined abiotic stress. The identified parameters—σik, Nk, τmin—offer potential biomarkers for screening and selecting genotypes with enhanced photosynthetic plasticity. Overall, sweet sorghum exhibits a remarkable capacity to optimize its photosynthetic apparatus under climate-relevant stressors, highlighting its potential contribution to future food and bioenergy security. Future research should validate these mechanisms under field conditions and assess their long-term impacts on biomass production and sugar yield. Integrating these mechanistic traits into breeding programs and crop modeling frameworks will be essential for developing climate-resilient C4 crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.-H.L. and X.-L.Y.; methodology, L.-H.L., X.-L.Y. and Z.-P.Y.; software, X.-L.Y. and Z.-P.Y.; validation, J.-J.L. and L.-H.L.; formal analysis, J.-J.L. and L.-H.L.; investigation, L.-H.L. and X.-L.Y.; resources, X.-L.Y.; data curation, L.-H.L. and X.-L.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-J.L. and L.-H.L.; writing—review and editing, J.-J.L., L.-H.L., X.-L.Y. and C.-W.Z.; visualization, J.-J.L. and L.-H.L.; supervision, C.-W.Z. and X.-L.Y.; project administration, C.-W.Z. and X.-L.Y.; funding acquisition, X.-L.Y. and Z.-P.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32260063) and the Gansu Provincial Technology Innovation Guidance Program (Grant No. 25CXNA025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Croce, R.; Carmo-Silva, E.; Cho, Y.B.; Ermakova, M.; Harbinson, J.; Lawson, T.; McCormick, A.J.; Niyogi, K.K.; Ort, D.R.; Patel-Tupper, D.; et al. Perspectives on improving photosynthesis to increase crop yield. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 3944–3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leister, D. Enhancing the light reactions of photosynthesis: Strategies, controversies, and perspectives. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ooms, M.D.; Dinh, C.T.; Sargent, E.H.; Sinton, D. Photon management for augmented photosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Porcar-Castell, A.; Tyystjärvi, E.; Atherton, J.; van der Tol, C.; Flexas, J.; Pfündel, E.E.; Moreno, J.; Frankenberg, C.; Berry, J.A. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: Mechanisms and challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4065–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Derks, A.; Schaven, K.; Bruce, D. Diverse mechanisms for photoprotection in photosynthesis. Dynamic regulation of photosystem II excitation in response to rapid environmental change. BBA-Bioenergetics 2015, 1847, 468–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Baker, N.R. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wimalasekera, R. Effect of light intensity on photosynthesis. In Photosynthesis, Productivity and Environmental Stress; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Salman, Y.; Ghannoum, O.; Cano, F.J. Elevated [CO2] negatively impacts C4 photosynthesis under heat and water stress without penalizing biomass. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 2875–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.; Qiao, Y.; Tian, Z.; Liu, H.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, C.; Dong, W.; Gu, L. Influence of fertilization on the dynamics of energy use in wheat. Plant Phenomics 2025, 7, 100063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, Y.; Wu, J.; Tian, Y.; Zha, T.; Jia, X.; Bourque, C.P.A.; Wu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, M. Light energy partitioning and photoprotection in an exotic species (Salix Psammophila) grown in a semi-arid area of northwestern China. Forests 2018, 9, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, Q.; Wang, Y.; Qu, M.; Ort, D.R.; Zhu, X.-G. The impact of modifying photosystem antenna size on canopy photosynthetic efficiency—Development of a new canopy photosynthesis model scaling from metabolism to canopy level processes. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2946–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Navakoudis, E.; Stergiannakos, T.; Daskalakis, V. A perspective on the major light-harvesting complex dynamics under the effect of pH, salts, and the photoprotective PsbS protein. Photosynth. Res. 2023, 156, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, X.-L.; Ma, X.-F.; Ye, Z.-P.; Yang, L.-S.; Shi, J.-B.; Wang, X.; Zhou, B.-B.; Wang, F.-B.; Deng, Z.-F. Simulating short-term light responses of photosynthesis and water use efficiency in sweet sorghum under varying temperature and CO2 conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1291630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Asadi, M.; Eshghizadeh, H.R. Response of sorghum genotypes to water deficit stress under different CO2 and nitrogen levels. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2021, 158, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tan, T.; Yu, J.; Shang, F. 2.58-Biorefinery Engineering. In Comprehensive Biotechnology, 2nd ed.; Moo-Young, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Burlington, VT, USA, 2011; pp. 815–828. [Google Scholar]
  16. FAO. World Food and Agriculture–Statistical Yearbook 2023; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cai, C.; Li, G.; Yang, H.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Struik, P.C.; Luo, W.; Yin, X.; Di, L.; Guo, X.; et al. Do all leaf photosynthesis parameters of rice acclimate to elevated CO2, elevated temperature, and their combination, in FACE environments? Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 1685–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pan, C.; Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Shi, K. Elevated CO2 improves photosynthesis under high temperature by atenuating the functional limitations to energy fluxes, electron transport and redox homeostasis in tomato leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moynul Haque, M.; Hamid, A.; Khanam, M.; Biswas, D.K.; Karim, M.A.; Khaliq, Q.A.; Hossain, M.A.; Uprety, D.C. The effect of elevated CO2 concentration on leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen contents in rice during post-flowering phases. Biol. Plantarum 2006, 50, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ye, Z.P.; Stirbet, A.; An, T.; Robakowski, P.; Kang, H.J.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, F.B. Investigation on absorption cross-section of photosynthetic pigment molecules based on a mechanistic model of the photosynthetic electron flow-light response in C3, C4 species and cyanobacteria grown under various conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1234462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ye, Z.P.; Suggett, J.D.; Robakowski, P.; Kang, H.J. A mechanistic model for the photosynthesis-light response based on the photosynthetic electron transport of photosystem II in C3 and C4 species. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wellburn, A.R. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 144, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, X.L.; An, T.; Ye, Z.W.; Kang, H.J.; Robakowski, P.; Ye, Z.P.; Wang, F.B.; Zhou, S.X. Modeling light response of effective quantum efficiency of photosystem II for C3 and C4 crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1478346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ye, Z.P. Nonlinear optical absorption of photosynthetic pigment molecules in leaves. Photosynth. Res. 2012, 112, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Krall, J.P.; Edwards, G.E. Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Physiol. Plant. 1992, 86, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ehleringer, J.J.O. Leaf absorptances of Mohave and Sonoran desert plants. Oecologia 1981, 49, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sales, C.R.G.; Wang, Y.; Evers, J.B.; Kromdijk, J. Improving C4 photosynthesis to increase productivity under optimal and suboptimal conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 5942–5960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, X.; Liu, R.; Li, C.; Zhang, H.; Slot, M. Contrasting responses of two C4 desert shrubs to drought but consistent decoupling of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance at high temperature. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 209, 105295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ivanov, A.G.; Sane, P.V.; Hurry, V.; Oquist, G.; Huner, N.P. Photosystem II reaction centre quenching: Mechanisms and physiological role. Photosynth. Res. 2008, 98, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruban, A.V. Nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: Mechanism and effectiveness in protecting plants from photodamage. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 1903–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johnson, M.P.; Goral, T.K.; Duffy, C.D.; Brain, A.P.; Mullineaux, C.W.; Ruban, A.V. Photoprotective energy dissipation involves the reorganization of photosystem II light-harvesting complexes in the grana membranes of spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1468–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yan, K.; Chen, P.; Shao, H.; Shao, C.; Zhao, S.; Brestic, M. Dissection of photosynthetic electron transport process in sweet sorghum under heat stress. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baly, E.C.C. The kinetics of photosynthesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1935, 149, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Farquhar, G.D.; Wong, S.C. An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1984, 11, 191–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thornley, J.H.M. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology; Academic Press: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  36. Silsbe, G.M.; Kromkamp, J.C. Modeling the irradiance dependency of the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis. Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth. 2012, 10, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smyth, T.J.; Pemberton, K.L.; Aiken, J.; Geider, R.J. A methodology to determine primary production and phytoplankton photosynthetic parameters from Fast Repetition Rate Fluorometry. J. Plankton Res. 2004, 26, 1337–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Ahammed, G.J.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, G.Q.; Sun, Z.H.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.H.; Xia, X.J.; Yu, J.Q.; Shi, K. Carbon dioxide enrichment alleviates heat stress by improving cellular redox homeostasis through an ABA-independent process in tomato plants. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duffy, C.D.P.; Ruban, A.V. Dissipative pathways in the photosystem-II antenna in plants. J. Photoch. Photobio. B 2015, 152, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Leiger, K.; Linnanto, J.M.; Freiberg, A. Establishment of the Qy absorption spectrum of chlorophyll a extending to near-infrared. Molecules 2020, 25, 3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Szabó, I.; Bergantino, E.; Giacometti, G.M. Light and oxygenic photosynthesis: Energy dissipation as a protection mechanism against photo-oxidation. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vasil’ev, S.; Orth, P.; Zouni, A.; Owens, T.G.; Bruce, D. Excited-state dynamics in photosystem II: Insights from the x-ray crystal structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8602–8607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Response curves of electron transport rate (J) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Figure 1. Response curves of electron transport rate (J) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Biology 14 01185 g001
Figure 2. Response curves of effective quantum efficiency (ΦPSII) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35° C (panels DF).
Figure 2. Response curves of effective quantum efficiency (ΦPSII) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35° C (panels DF).
Biology 14 01185 g002
Figure 3. Response curves of effective absorption cross-section of pigment molecules (σ′ik) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Figure 3. Response curves of effective absorption cross-section of pigment molecules (σ′ik) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Biology 14 01185 g003
Figure 4. Response curves of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Figure 4. Response curves of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Biology 14 01185 g004
Figure 5. Response curves of excited-state pigment molecules (Nk) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Figure 5. Response curves of excited-state pigment molecules (Nk) to irradiance (I) in sweet sorghum under CO2 concentrations of 250, 410, and 550 μmol mol−1 at 30 °C (panels AC) and at 35 °C (panels DF).
Biology 14 01185 g005
Table 1. Photosynthetic parameters derived from JI curves and ΦPSIII response curves of sweet sorghum under varying ambient CO2 concentration (Ca) and leaf temperature (TLeaf) conditions.
Table 1. Photosynthetic parameters derived from JI curves and ΦPSIII response curves of sweet sorghum under varying ambient CO2 concentration (Ca) and leaf temperature (TLeaf) conditions.
Photosynthetic ParametersTLeaf = 30 °CTLeaf = 35 °C
Ca = 250 μmol mol−1Ca = 410 μmol mol−1Ca = 550 μmol mol−1Ca = 250 μmol mol−1Ca = 410 μmol mol−1Ca = 550 μmol mol−1
FittedMeasuredFittedMeasuredFittedMeasuredFittedMeasuredFittedMeasuredFittedMeasured
α0.262
± 0.020 ab
0.261 ± 0.013 ab0.252 ± 0.005 ab0.278
± 0.004 a
0.246 ± 0.016 ab0.232
± 0.009 b
Jmax (μmol electron m−2 s−1)135.46
± 3.53 c
133.63
± 3.30 c
134.67
± 5.05 c
133.84
± 5.52 c
184.27
± 5.93 b
184.82
± 5.49 b
141.48
± 6.46 c
142.20
± 1.92 c
179.55
± 8.72 b
179.88
± 8.45 b
223.16
± 4.90 a
223.57
± 5.06 a
Ie-sat (μmol photons m−2 s−1)1412.1
± 43.4 d
1280.0
± 48.9 d
1515.0
± 33.3 cd
1600.0
± 63.2 c
1795.7
± 16.5 b
1800.0
± 0.0 b
1411.4
± 17.6 d
1400.0
± 63.2 d
1665.4
± 154.8 bc
1666.7
± 176.4 bc
1896.5
± 28.9 ab
2000.00
± 0.00 a
σik
(×10−21 m2)
2.43
± 0.19 ab
2.42
± 0.12 ab
2.33
± 0.06 ab
2.58
± 0.05 a
2.28
± 0.14 b
2.16
± 0.09 b
τmin (ms)7.83
± 0.71 a
8.65
± 0.61 a
5.14
± 0.52 b
7.88
± 0.62 a
4.68
± 0.44 b
2.93
± 0.23 c
N0 (×1016 m2)17.09
± 0.06 a
17.10
± 0.07 a
13.99
± 0.09 b
17.09
± 0.06 a
13.29
± 0.12 b
13.51
± 0.96 b
ΦPSIImax0.569
± 0.029 b
0.573
± 0.026 b
0.590
± 0.018 a
0.601
± 0.013 a
0.599
± 0.003 b
0.623 ± 0.005 ab0.562
± 0.018 b
0.573
± 0.015 b
0.587
± 0.018 b
0.604
± 0.015 ab
0.626
± 0.009 a
0.646
± 0.011 a
R2
(JI curves)
0.9970
± 0.0006
0.9979
± 0.0005
0.9994
± 0.0001
0.9972
± 0.0007
0.9975
± 0.0018
0.9996
± 0.0001
R2
(ΦPSIII curves)
0.9945
± 0.0014
0.9932
± 0.0023
0.9889
± 0.0034
0.9895
± 0.0039
0.9900
± 0.0031
0.9770
± 0.0009
Parameters include the maximum electron transport rate (Jmax), saturation irradiance (Ie-sat), total number of pigment molecules in the measured leaf (N0), eigen-absorption cross-section of pigment molecules (σik), minimum average lifetime of pigment molecules in the excited state (τmin), and the maximum effective quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSIImax). All values are presented as means ± SE. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between fitted and measured values within each treatment.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.-J.; Liu, L.-H.; Ye, Z.-P.; Zhang, C.-W.; Yang, X.-L. Regulation of Light Absorption and Energy Dissipation in Sweet Sorghum Under Climate-Relevant CO2 and Temperature Conditions. Biology 2025, 14, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091185

AMA Style

Li J-J, Liu L-H, Ye Z-P, Zhang C-W, Yang X-L. Regulation of Light Absorption and Energy Dissipation in Sweet Sorghum Under Climate-Relevant CO2 and Temperature Conditions. Biology. 2025; 14(9):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jin-Jing, Li-Hua Liu, Zi-Piao Ye, Chao-Wei Zhang, and Xiao-Long Yang. 2025. "Regulation of Light Absorption and Energy Dissipation in Sweet Sorghum Under Climate-Relevant CO2 and Temperature Conditions" Biology 14, no. 9: 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091185

APA Style

Li, J.-J., Liu, L.-H., Ye, Z.-P., Zhang, C.-W., & Yang, X.-L. (2025). Regulation of Light Absorption and Energy Dissipation in Sweet Sorghum Under Climate-Relevant CO2 and Temperature Conditions. Biology, 14(9), 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14091185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop