Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Therapeutic Potential of Traditionally-Used Natural Plant Extracts to Inhibit Proliferation of a HeLa Cell Cancer Line and Replication of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (hRSV)
Previous Article in Journal
Prospects and Current Challenges of Extracellular Vesicle-Based Biomarkers in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Typical Marine Ecological Disasters in China Attributed to Marine Organisms and Their Significant Insights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cloning and Functional Analysis of a Zeaxanthin Epoxidase Gene in Ulva prolifera

by
Hongyan He
1,†,
Xiuwen Yang
1,†,
Aurang Zeb
1,
Jiasi Liu
1,
Huiyue Gu
1,
Jieru Yang
1,
Wenyu Xiang
2 and
Songdong Shen
1,*
1
School of Biology & Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215101, China
2
Suzhou Industrial Park Environmental Law Enforcement Brigade, Suzhou 215021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2024, 13(9), 695; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090695
Submission received: 8 August 2024 / Revised: 26 August 2024 / Accepted: 29 August 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biology, Ecology and Management of Aquatic Macrophytes and Algae)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The xanthophyll cycle plays an important role in plants’ responses to abiotic stress. Zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) contributes to the xanthophyll cycle and the biosynthesis of abscisic acid (ABA) and carotenoids. The biological function of ZEP has been extensively studied in higher plants but has not been reported in Ulva prolifera. In this study, the relative content of xanthophylls was determined in U. prolifera. We also cloned and analyzed a ZEP gene from U. prolifera, namely UpZEP. The expression and biological function of the UpZEP gene were examined. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for understanding the high-salt resistance of U. prolifera.

Abstract

The xanthophyll cycle is a photoprotective mechanism in plants and algae, which protects the photosynthetic system from excess light damage under abiotic stress. Zeaxanthin is considered to play a pivotal role in this process. In this study, the relative content of xanthophylls was determined using HPLC-MS/MS in Ulva prolifera exposed to different salinities. The results showed that high-salt stress significantly increased the relative content of xanthophylls and led to the accumulation of zeaxanthin. It was speculated that the accumulated zeaxanthin may contribute to the response of U. prolifera to high-salt stress. Zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) is a key enzyme in the xanthophyll cycle and is also involved in the synthesis of abscisic acid and carotenoids. In order to explore the biological function of ZEP, a ZEP gene was cloned and identified from U. prolifera. The CDS of UpZEP is 1122 bp and encodes 373 amino acids. Phylogenetic analysis showed that UpZEP clusters within a clade of green algae. The results of qRT-PCR showed that high-salt stress induced the expression of UpZEP. In addition, heterologous overexpression of the UpZEP gene in yeast and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii improved the salt tolerance of transgenic organisms. In conclusion, the UpZEP gene may be involved in the response of U. prolifera to high-salt stress and can improve the high-salt tolerance of transgenic organisms.

1. Introduction

Green tides are a marine ecological anomaly that usually occur in eutrophicated estuaries, inner bays and urban dense coastal zones [1]. Under certain environmental conditions, green seaweed rapidly grows and propagates, accumulating in piles and thus causing green tides [2]. The first large-scale outbreak of green tides occurred in France, followed by the United States, Japan and China [3]. In recent years, green tides have increasingly become a global environmental concern because of the rising severity, geographical scale and frequency of macroalgal blooms [4]. Since 2007, green tides have been breaking out along the Yellow Sea coast every year. Green tides cover a wide area and have a large influence, seriously threatening the ecological safety of China [3,5]. The common species causing green tide disasters in China are Ulva, Cladophora and Chaetomorpha, with Ulva prolifera being the predominant species [6,7].
U. prolifera grows in nearshore ponds, estuaries and intertidal zones, where the environment is very complex and susceptible to abiotic stresses, such as salt stress, light stress and temperature stress [8]. To cope with abiotic stress, U. prolifera has evolved numerous defense mechanisms [9,10]. Salt stress is one of the abiotic stresses that restricts the growth and development of U. prolifera [11,12]. In general, both too high and too low salinity have adverse effects on photosynthesis, respiration and other physiological activities of U. prolifera [11]. In order to understand how U. prolifera responds to salt stress, biochemical and physiological response mechanisms have been extensively investigated [12,13]. Under salt stress, the photosynthetic performance of U. prolifera decreases, and the expression levels of several stress-resistance protein-related genes, such as heat shock protein and tubulin, are significantly up-regulated. These play an important role in sustaining life activities [12]. U. prolifera can also cope with high-salt stress by enhancing non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) [13]. Moreover, U. prolifera cells accumulate carbohydrates, such as glucose and fructan, under salt stress, with their main functions being osmotic protection and scavenging reactive oxide species (ROS) [14]. Interestingly, U. prolifera has salinity-dependent morphological variations; it has more branches under low salinity conditions and longer branches under high salt conditions [15].
In general, plants capture and use light energy efficiently. However, under environmental stress, plants can absorb excess light energy, which can lead to the destruction of the photosystem [16]. To avoid destroying the photosystems, plants have evolved a variety of photoprotection strategies, among which the xanthophyll cycle is considered an important photoprotection mechanism [17]. The xanthophyll cycle involves three components: violaxanthin, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin. When plants receive excess light energy, zeaxanthin is produced through two de-epoxidation reactions under the action of violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE). Conversely, when light energy is insufficient, violaxanthin is produced by two epoxidation reactions under the action of zeaxanthin epoxidase, with antheraxanthin serving as the intermediate product in both the de-epoxidation and epoxidation reactions [18]. The xanthophylls are uniformly distributed in the thylakoid membrane, where they bind to the light-harvesting complex (LHC), which changes its conformation, leading to the dissipation of excess light energy [19]. Zeaxanthin, a xanthophyll with strong antioxidant activity, is widely used in feed, cosmetics, food and medical treatment [20]. Moreover, zeaxanthin can eliminate ROS generated by photosynthesis, such as triplet oxygen, singlet oxygen and superoxide anion, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the photosystem [21].
Zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) is a bi-functional monooxygenase that epoxidizes zeaxanthin to antheraxanthin and then further to violaxanthin. This epoxidation reaction not only contributes to the xanthophyll cycle but also to the biosynthesis of abscisic acid (ABA) and carotenoids [22,23]. Several reports have suggested that ZEP plays an important role in plant growth, development and abiotic stress resistance [24]. Under abiotic stress, plants can regulate the content of carotenoids and other secondary metabolites by regulating the expression of the ZEP gene, thereby removing excessive ROS caused by abiotic stress. The expression of ZEP in tobacco and tomato roots significantly increased under drought stress [25,26]. The expression of ZEP in Arabidopsis thaliana roots was up-regulated under drought stress, and the content of ABA in roots and leaves also increased [27]. In addition, overexpression of a ZEP gene from Medicago sativa in tobacco significantly improved its salt tolerance [28]. The high expression of ZEP genes involved in ABA synthesis in Brassica napus increased drought tolerance [29]. These studies demonstrate that higher plants respond to abiotic stress by up-regulating ZEP gene expression.
The biological function of ZEP has been extensively studied in higher plants but has not been reported in U. prolifera. Here, the HPLC-MS/MS technique was employed to determine the relative contents of lutein, violaxanthin, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin in U. prolifera cultivated under normal and high-salt conditions. Then, a ZEP gene was cloned and analyzed from U. prolifera, and the expression of the UpZEP gene was analyzed using qRT-PCR. In addition, to detect the function of the UpZEP gene, it was heterologously overexpressed in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which provided scientific insight into the high-salt resistance of U. prolifera.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Alga Material and Treatment

U. prolifera was collected from the coast of Qingdao, China (36°48′39.75″ N; 121°38′10.88″ E). Pure lines were obtained through genetic and morphological identification and were cultured in our laboratory. These lines were then cultured in distilled seawater supplemented with Von Stosch’s Enriched (VSE) medium under conditions of 20 ± 1 °C, a light intensity of 120 µmol photons m−2·s−1 and a photoperiod of 12 L:12 D [30]. After 15 d of cultivation, the thalli with healthy growth and similar lengths were selected and placed in a constant temperature light incubator for high-salt stress (50‰) treatment at different time points, with other culture conditions remaining unchanged.
The C. reinhardtii wild-type (WT) strain was provided by Dr. Yingjuan Wang (College of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi’an, China) and was cultivated in Tris-acetate-phosphate (TAP) medium under the following conditions: a light intensity of 50–60 μmol photons m−2·s−1, a photoperiod of 12 L:12 D and 21 ± 1 °C. High-salt treatment was performed in 120 mM sodium chloride at different time points. The cell growth rate was assessed by measuring OD750.

2.2. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) Analysis

The frozen U. prolifera samples were pulverized in liquid nitrogen. About 0.5 g of the powder was aliquoted into a tube and 5 mL of acetone was added. After ultrasonication in a water bath for 15 min, the sample was centrifuged. The upper phase was collected, and the precipitate was repeatedly extracted until it was colorless. The resulting sample solution was dried with nitrogen gas. The dry extracts were dissolved in 25 mL of methanol and then filtered through a 0.22 μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane filter. All the samples were analyzed using HPLC-MS/MS.
We employed an Agilent 1290 high performance liquid chromatograph in tandem (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an AB Qtrap6500 mass spectrometer (Allen-Bradley, Milwaukee, WI, USA)to quantify lutein, zeaxanthin, violaxanthin and antheraxanthin contents. The samples were injected into a CORTECS UPLC C18+ column (1.6 μm, 2.1 mm × 75 mm) and maintained at 35 °C. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and mobile phase B consisted of methanol. The column was eluted at a flow rate of 450 µL/min, with the gradient elution profile starting at 10% A and 90% B for 3 min. The proportion of mobile phase B was then increased to 100%, and mobile phase A was decreased to 0%. Finally, the initial mobile phase proportions were restored within 4 min to equilibrate the column for a further 2 min. The samples were then analyzed using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) in the positive mode under the following conditions: ion source temperature TEM (transmission electron microscopy), 380 °C; curtain gas, 40 Psi; nebulizer gas (Gas1), 50 Psi; auxiliary heating gas (Gas2), 55 Psi; and collision gas CAD (collision activated dissociation), medium. The parameters for the MS analysis of xanthophylls are listed in Table S1. The relative contents of xanthophylls were quantified by integrating and comparing peak areas with those of the matrix-matched calibration curve.

2.3. RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

The total RNA was extracted from U. prolifera and C. reinhardtii using TRIzol reagents (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by reverse-transcription into cDNA using the Hifair™ II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). Then, the levels of transcripts were detected using the Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Low Rox Plus) (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2. The 18Sr RNA and Tubulin were used as the internal reference genes for U. prolifera and C. reinhardtii, respectively. All the samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the 2−ΔΔCT method was used to determine the transcript levels.

2.4. Full-Length of the UpZEP Gene Cloning and Bioinformatics Analysis

The sequence of the ZEP gene was obtained from the U. prolifera genome [31]. The full-length sequences and coding DNA sequences (CDS) of the UpZEP gene were amplified using the genomic DNA and cDNA from U. prolifera as templates, respectively. The primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 and are listed in Table S2. The physicochemical properties of the UpZEP protein were analyzed using the Prot Param program [32]. To analyze the phylogenetic relationship, ZEP protein sequences from representative Plants, Chlorophyta, Bacillariophyta, Rhodophyta and Cyanobacteria were downloaded from NCBI. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW2.1, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbors-joining method with MEGA6 (Bootstrap value = 1000). The Newick tree was exported from MEGA6 and improved using the Evolview website (https://evolgenius.info//evolview-v2 (accessed on 26 July 2024)).

2.5. C. reinhardtii Transformation and Screening of Positive Clones

We used the pChlamy-3 vector, an expression vector containing the Hsp70A-Rbc S2 fusion promoter, to explore the function of the UpZEP gene. The FAD (flavin adenine dinucleotide) domain coding sequences of the UpZEP gene were amplified to construct the recombinant vector pChlamy-3_UpZEP. Then, the pChlamy-3_UpZEP recombinant expression vector was transformed into C. reinhardtii using the “glass bead transformation method”, and monoclonal algal colonies were selected on hygromycin-B-containing medium (50 mg mL−1). The hygromycin-B-resistant and wild-type strains of C. reinhardtii were randomly selected, genomic DNA was extracted and the UpZEP gene sequences were amplified using gene-specific primers (Table S2).

2.6. Functional Characterization via Heterologous Expressions of the UpZEP Gene in Yeasts

The FAD domain coding sequences of the UpZEP gene were recombined into the pYES2 vector. The recombinant plasmid pYES2-UpZEP was transformed into the S. cerevisiae strain INVSc1 (Coolaber, Beijing, China), and yeast cells harboring pYES2-UpZEP were selected on SD-Ura medium (Coolaber, Beijing, China). Single colonies were picked and transferred into liquid SD-Ura medium, then grown overnight at 200 rpm in a shaker at 30 °C. An aliquot of 1 mL of the suspension was centrifuged, resuspended in 100 µL of ddH2O and added to SG-Ura medium (Coolaber, Beijing, China) containing different concentrations of NaCl to observe growth.

2.7. Measurement of Chlorophyll Contents in C. reinhardtii

The samples were dissolved in 95% ethanol and crushed using an ultrasonic homogenizer. Then, they were placed in a dark environment at 4 °C for 24 h, and the absorbance values at OD665 and OD649 were measured. The contents of chlorophyll were calculated using the following equations:
Chl. a = 13.95 × OD665 − 6.88 × OD649
Chl. b = 24.96 × OD649 − 7.32 × OD665
Total chlorophyll = Chl. a + Chl. b

2.8. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were conducted using Tukey’s test with GraphPad Prism software. Statistical significance was indicated by p-values of p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, marked as *, **, *** and ****, respectively. Three biological replicates were performed for all experimental treatments. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3. Results

3.1. Determination of Relative Content of Xanthophylls in U. prolifera

The relative contents of xanthophylls in U. prolifera grown under different salinity conditions were tested using HPLC-MS/MS technology. The results indicated the presence of several kinds of xanthophylls in U. prolifera, such as lutein (L), zeaxanthin (Z), antheraxanthin (A) and violaxanthin (V), with lutein and zeaxanthin being the main components. Compared to the control group (25‰), the relative contents of lutein, zeaxanthin and violaxanthin increased significantly (p < 0.05) under high-salt stress (50‰), whereas the content of antheraxanthin remained unchanged (Figure 1A–D). Under high-salt stress (50‰), the content of de-epoxidized xanthophylls increased significantly (p < 0.05) compared to the control group (25‰), resulting in the xanthophyll cycle being in a de-epoxidation state ([Z/(V + A + Z)]; [(Z + 0.5A)/(V + A + Z)]) (Figure 1E,F).

3.2. Full-Length Cloning and Characterization of the UpZEP Gene

We amplified the full-length sequence and CDS of the U. prolifera gene using PCR (Figure S1). After a BLAST search, the gene was identified as the ZEP gene and named UpZEP. The full-length sequence of the UpZEP gene is 1609 bp, containing three exons and two introns, with a CDS of 1122 bp, encoding 373 amino acids. The ProtParam tool was used to analyze the properties of the protein, revealing that the molecular mass of the UpZEP protein is about 41.37 kDa, and the theoretical isoelectric point is 5.68.
The UpZEP protein sequences were aligned with ZEP proteins from A. thaliana, Oryza sativa, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Haematococcus lacustris and C. reinhardtii. As shown in Figure 2, the amino acid sequence of UpZEP exhibits high homology with their ZEPs. Furthermore, there are two highly conserved regions, which were predicted to be the FAD domain and the FHA (fork head-associated) domain, respectively. This suggests that UpZEP likely performs the same role as other ZEPs, catalyzing epoxidation using NADPH and FAD as cofactors [33].
In order to further investigate the evolutionary relationship of UpZEP, MEGA 6 software was used to construct a phylogenetic tree of ZEPs from several Plants, Chlorophyta, Rhodophyta, Bacillariophyta and Cyanobacteria using the neighbor-joining method. The results showed that UpZEP clustered with other Chlorophyta ZEPs in a single branch, with UpZEP being most closely related to the ZEP of D. tertiolecta (Figure 3). UpZEP and other Chlorophyta ZEPs were evolutionarily closer to the ZEPs of land plants. These results suggest that the function of UpZEP may be similar to the ZEPs of Chlorophyta and land plants.

3.3. Expression Levels of the UpZEP Gene under High-Salt Stress

In order to investigate the expression patterns of the UpZEP gene under high-salt stress (50‰), the expression of the UpZEP gene was analyzed at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h under different salinity conditions. The internal reference gene used was 18Sr RNA. Compared to the control group (25‰), high-salt stress (50‰) significantly induced the expression of the UpZEP gene (p < 0.01). The gene expression reached maximum at 24 h, then decreased at 48 h but remained significantly higher than in the control group (25‰) (p < 0.01) (Figure 4).

3.4. Functional Characterization via Heterologous Expressions of the UpZEP Gene in Yeast

To investigate whether heterologous overexpression of the UpZEP gene affects high-salt tolerance in yeast, the recombinant vector pYES2-UpZEP was transformed into S. cerevisiae INVSc1 strains. Yeasts transformed with pYES2-UpZEP (experimental group) and those with empty pYES2 (control group) were respectively cultured on SG-Ura medium with different salinities. The results showed that both strains could grow on SG-Ura medium containing 0 M, 0.5 M and 1 M NaCl. On the SG-Ura medium with 0 M NaCl, there was no difference in the biomass between the two groups. On the SG-Ura medium with 0.5 M and 1 M NaCl, the biomass of the strains in the experimental group increased significantly compared to the control group; however, on the SG-Ura medium with 1.3 M NaCl, the control strains showed no growth, whereas the experimental strains were able to grow (Figure 5).

3.5. Validation of C. reinhardtii Transformation and UpZEP Gene Expression Levels under High-Salt Stress

To further explore the biological function of the UpZEP gene in vivo, we generated a transgenic C. reinhardtii strain with heterologous overexpression of the UpZEP gene. Then, the phenotype, physiological parameters and gene expression patterns of transgenic C. reinhardtii were analyzed and compared to the wild-type. Firstly, the overexpression vector pChlamy-3-UpZEP was constructed and transformed into C. reinhardtii using the “glass bead transformation method”. Then, hygromycin-B-resistant monoclonal algal colonies were obtained and screened using PCR amplification with special primers (Table S2). The selected monoclonal colonies produced target bands of the expected size, whereas the wild-type colonies did not produce bands, suggesting that UpZEP was successfully integrated into the genome of C. reinhardtii (Figure 6A).
To explore the expression patterns of the UpZEP gene in the transgenic C. reinhardtii strain, algae cultured under normal conditions were used as the control group, and strains cultured under 120 mM NaCl conditions were used as the experimental group. The expression levels of the UpZEP gene at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h in the two groups were detected using a qRT-PCR assay. Tubulin was used as the internal reference gene. The results showed that the transgenic C. reinhardtii exhibited a short adaptation period under high-salt stress. At 24 h, there was no significant difference in UpZEP gene expression between the two groups. However, compared to the control group, the UpZEP transcription level in the experimental group was significantly increased (p < 0.01) and showed an upward trend at 48 h and 72 h, indicating that the UpZEP gene was induced by high-salt stress (Figure 6B).

3.6. Analysis of High-Salt Stress Tolerance in Transgenic C. reinhardtii

In order to explore the high-salt stress resistance of C. reinhardtii containing the UpZEP gene, wild-type and transgenic C. reinhardtii strains were cultured under 120 mM NaCl for 6 d. The color of transgenic C. reinhardtii changed from light green to dark green, whereas the wild-type did not change color. The transgenic C. reinhardtii appeared greener than the wild-type (Figure 7A). Additionally, biomass was measured using OD750 light absorption values (Figure 7B). The results showed that the biomass of transgenic C. reinhardtii was higher than that of the wild-type after 1 d of exposure to 120 mM NaCl. The corresponding phenotypic observations and biomass measurements were consistent, indicating that the UpZEP gene enhanced the salt tolerance of C. reinhardtii.
Simultaneously, the wild-type and transgenic C. reinhardtii strains were cultured under 120 mM NaCl for 0, 1, 2 and 3 d, and the chlorophyll content was measured. The transgenic C. reinhardtii had a short adaptation period under high-salt stress. At 1 d, there was no significant difference in chlorophyll content between the transgenic and wild-type strains; however, the chlorophyll content of transgenic C. reinhardtii was significantly higher compared to the wild-type strains at 2 and 3 d (Figure 7C).

4. Discussion

Under abiotic stress, the decreased growth rate of plants and algae is often associated with reduced photosynthesis [34]. This decline in photosynthesis in plants and algae will lead to an increase in excess light energy. If the excess excitation energy is not dissipated in time, this will lead to the accumulation of ROS, resulting in oxidative damage [16]. To avoid or minimize this photoinhibition damage, plants have evolved a variety of protective mechanisms, with carotenoids playing an important role in plant photoprotection [17]. Carotenoids dissipate excess light energy through NPQ, which is mediated by zeaxanthin [13,17]. In plants and algae, carotenoids are synthesized and accumulated in the thylakoid membrane, especially within the LHC [18]. Carotenoids are classified into carotenes and xanthophylls, and α-and β-carotene can be converted into xanthophylls. Seaweeds, a special class of marine plants, each have their own unique carotenoid composition [35]. In this study, we analyzed the carotenoids of U. prolifera, a dominant green tide species in China. The results showed that the carotenoids of U. prolifera are mainly lutein and zeaxanthin, and salt stress induced an increase in the contents of lutein, zeaxanthin and violaxanthin. In our previous study, we also found that low-light and high-salt stress promoted carotenoid synthesis [36]. In addition, carotenoid synthesis is induced by copper stress in Ulva compressa [37]. Collectively, these findings suggest that abiotic stress commonly promotes the synthesis and accumulation of carotenoids in Ulva. Under abiotic stresses, such as light stress, salinity stress and nitrogen deprivation, the carotenoid content also increased in D. salina, which is thought to be a strategy for resisting abiotic stress [38]. In this study, the carotenoid content increased under high-salt stress, indicating that their important role in the salt tolerance of U. prolifera.
Lutein is considered to be a xanthophyll involved in NPQ and acts as a direct quencher of chlorophyll a [38]. However, zeaxanthin is an allosteric modulator of non-photochemical energy dissipation [39]. In U. pertusa, accumulated zeaxanthin protects the thylakoid membrane and enhances thermal quenching during desiccation [40]. Slow zeaxanthin accumulation in U. prolifera under high-light stress is considered atypical for NPQ [41]. In this study, high-salt stress significantly increased the relative content of xanthophylls, leading to the accumulation of zeaxanthin, which may have a positive effect on the high-salt stress response of U. prolifera. The xanthophyll cycle significantly contributes to photoprotection in plants [19]. Violaxanthin and antheraxanthin, the epoxidation products of zeaxanthin, are the key precursors of carotenoids and also participate in the xanthophyll cycle. The catalytic function of ZEP has diversified through plant evolution [42]. The ZEP gene exists widely in photosynthetic eukaryotes. At present, the ZEP gene has been identified in several plants and algae. The genome of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum harbors three ZEP genes, but only one ZEP gene is involved in NPQ [43]. Nannochloropsis oceanica contains two ZEP genes [44], and one ZEP gene has been identified in D. tertiolecta [33]. In this study, the UpZEP gene was cloned from U. prolifera. The amino acid sequence of UpZEP exhibited high homology with other ZEPs, and the UpZEP protein contained FAD and FHA domains, indicating that UpZEP is a typical ZEP protein. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the UpZEP clustered into a clade with ZEPs from green algae, and most closed to D. tertiolecta. Although red algae has no xanthophyll cycle, it has a ZEP gene that is not the same as that in terrestrial plants and other algae. This ZEP introduces an epoxide group into zeaxanthin and produces antheraxanthin instead of violaxanthin, indicating that the ZEP gene of red algae is relatively primitive. At the same time, this also indicates that ZEP first only catalyzed the transformation of zeaxanthin into antheraxanthin during the evolutionary process, and later acquired the ability to catalyze antheraxanthin into violaxanthin [42].
The ZEP gene is involved in the synthesis of carotenoids and ABA and plays a vital role in plant responses to abiotic stress [22,23]. In D. tertiolecta, with increasing salinity, the expression of the ZEP gene increased gradually [45]. In this study, UpZEP gene expression was up-regulated under high-salt stress, which is consistent with that of D. tertiolecta under salt stress, indicating that UpZEP gene expression was induced by salt stress in U. prolifera. However, down-regulation of the ZEP gene is thought to be associated with chilling sensitivities in rice [46]. Hoang et al. [47] proposed that the reversible down-regulation of ZEP gene expression plays an indispensable role in plants, and this reversible down-regulation mechanism is a common mechanism in plants under various light conditions at room temperature. Considering the existence of these opposite expression patterns, the role of the UpZEP gene U. prolifera under salt stress warrants further in-depth research.
Cao et al. reported that overexpression of the ZEP gene from Medicago sativa enhanced the tolerance of transgenic tobacco to low-light stress [28]. Overexpression of the alfalfa ZEP gene conferred drought and salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco [29]. Park et al. [48] found that overexpression of the AtZEP gene made transgenic A. thaliana plants grow more vigorously under salt and drought stress. In this study, the UpZEP gene was transformed into yeast cells and was overexpressed. The results showed that UpZEP transgenic yeast exhibited growth on SG-Ura medium containing 1.3 M NaCl, whereas the empty pYES2 vector transgenic yeast strain did not, indicating that overexpression of the UpZEP gene enhances salt tolerance in yeast. Meanwhile, the UpZEP gene was heterogeneously overexpressed in C. reinhardtii. Transcription level analysis showed that the UpZEP gene expression level was significantly up-regulated under high-salt stress, indicating that the gene was induced by salt stress. Under continuous salt stress, transgenic C. reinhardtii had a higher survival rate and chlorophyll content than the wild-type. These results suggest that the UpZEP gene enhances plant salt tolerance. As a euryhaline marine organism, the discovery of the Ulva salt-tolerant gene will be useful for breeding salt-tolerant crops in the future. For example, functional expression of an animal type-Na+-ATPase gene from the red seaweed Porphyra yezoensis increases salinity tolerance in rice plants [49].

5. Conclusions

The current study analyzed the relative content of xanthophylls in U. prolifera under different salinity conditions. We found that high-salt stress significantly increased the relative content of xanthophylls. A ZEP gene was cloned and identified from U. prolifera, and the UpZEP gene expression was significantly induced by high-salt stress. Moreover, heterologous overexpression of the UpZEP gene in yeast and C. reinhardtii increased their tolerance to salt. These results provide a new perspective for studying the resistance mechanisms of U. prolifera to high-salt stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13090695/s1. Table S1 Mass spectrometry analysis parameters. Table S2 Primers and sequences used in this experiment. Figure S1 Gel electrophoresis of the cloned product of the UpZEP gene. (A) PCR products of full-length sequence of UpZEP gene; (B) PCR products of CDS of UpZEP gene.

Author Contributions

Methodology, investigation, data curation and writing—original draft, H.H.; methodology, formal analysis and writing—review and editing, X.Y.; methodology, A.Z.; data curation, J.L.; methodology, H.G.; software, J.Y.; resources, W.X.; conceptualization, formal analysis and funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant number 42276100) and the project was funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. There were no conflicts of interest in this study.

References

  1. Smetacek, V.; Zingone, A. Green and golden seaweed tides on the rise. Nature 2013, 504, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cui, J.; Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Q.; Chen, L.; Yu, K.; He, P. Adaptability of free-floating green tide algae in the Yellow Sea to variable temperature and light intensity. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 101, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ye, N.; Zhang, X.; Mao, Y.; Liang, C.-W.; Xu, D.; Zou, J.; Zhuang, Z.-M.; Wang, Q.-Y. ‘Green tides’ are overwhelming the coastline of our blue planet: Taking the world’s largest example. Ecol. Res. 2011, 26, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Z.; Xiao, J.; Fan, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, D. Who made the world’s largest green tide in China?—An integrated study on the initiation and early development of the green tide in Yellow Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2015, 60, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; He, P.; Li, H.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; Jiao, F.; Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Shi, X.; Su, R.; et al. Ulva prolifera green-tide outbreaks and their environmental impact in the Yellow Sea, China. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Yu, K.; Chen, Q.; He, Q.; Han, W.; Chen, L.; Cao, J.; Shi, D.; He, P. Growth characteristics and reproductive capability of green tide algae in Rudong coast, China. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, J.; Jiang, P.; Liu, Z.; Wei, W.; Lin, H.; Li, F.; Wang, J.; Qin, S. The yellow sea green tides were dominated by one species, Ulva (Enteromorpha) prolifera, from 2007 to 2011. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 58, 2298–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiao, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, C.; Jiang, M.; Li, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Fan, S.; Zhang, X. Effect of temperature, salinity and irradiance on growth and photosynthesis of Ulva prolifera. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2016, 35, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, X.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qu, T.; Jiang, Y.; Tang, X.; Wang, Y. Cooperation between photosynthetic and antioxidant systems: An important factor in the adaptation of Ulva prolifera to abiotic factors on the sea surface. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, H.; Gao, G.; Zhong, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, J. Physiological acclimation of the green tidal alga Ulva prolifera to a fast-changing environment. Mar. Environ. Res. 2018, 137, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, M.; Lin, J.; Zhou, S.; Zhong, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, N. Salinity mediates the effects of nitrogen enrichment on the growth, photosynthesis, and biochemical composition of Ulva prolifera. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 19982–19990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhuo, J.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Shi, M.; Huan, L.; Wang, G. Transcriptomic analysis of Ulva prolifera in response to salt stress. Water 2022, 15, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, Z.; Gao, S.; Wang, G.; Cock, M. High salt stress in the upper part of floating mats of Ulva prolifera, a species that causes green tides, enhances non-photochemical quenching. J. Phycol. 2019, 55, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luo, M.; Liu, F. Salinity-Induced oxidative stress and regulation of antioxidant defense system in the marine macroalga Ulva prolifera. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2011, 409, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, G.; Zhong, Z.; Zhou, X.; Xu, J. Changes in morphological plasticity of Ulva prolifera under different environmental conditions: A laboratory experiment. Harmful Algae 2016, 59, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Demmig-Adams, B.; Adams, W. Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature: Uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species. Planta 1996, 198, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fernández-Marín, B.; Roach, T.; Verhoeven, A.; García-Plazaola, J.I. Shedding light on the dark side of xanthophyll cycles. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1336–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Demmig-Adams, B.; Adams, W. The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jahns, P.; Holzwarth, A.R. The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2012, 1817, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Croce, R.; Cinque, G.; Holzwarth, A.; Bassi, R. The Soret absorption properties of carotenoids and chlorophylls in antenna complexes of higher plants. Photosynth. Res. 2000, 64, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Welc, R.; Luchowski, R.; Kluczyk, D.; Zubik-Duda, M.; Grudzinski, W.; Maksim, M.; Reszczynska, E.; Sowinski, K.; Mazur, R.; Nosalewicz, A.; et al. Mechanisms shaping the synergism of zeaxanthin and PsbS in photoprotective energy dissipation in the photosynthetic apparatus of plants. Plant J. 2021, 107, 418–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hieber, A.; Bugos, R.; Yamamoto, H. Plant lipocalins: Violaxanthin de-epoxidase and zeaxanthin epoxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 2000, 1482, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jia, K.-P.; Mi, J.; Ali, S.; Ohyanagi, H.; Moreno, J.C.; Ablazov, A.; Balakrishna, A.; Berqdar, L.; Fiore, A.; Diretto, G.; et al. An alternative, zeaxanthin epoxidase-independent abscisic acid biosynthetic pathway in plants. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Audran, C.; Liotenberg, S.; Gonneau, M.; North, H.; Frey, A.; Tap-Waksman, K.; Vartanian, N.; Marion-Poll, A. Localisation and expression of zeaxanthin epoxidase mRNA in Arabdopsis in response to drought stress and during seed development. Funct. Plant Biol. 2001, 28, 1161–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schwarz, N.; Armbruster, U.; Iven, T.; Brückle, L.; Melzer, M.; Feussner, I.; Jahns, P. Tissue specific accumulation and regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase in Arabidopsis reflect the multiple functions of the enzyme in plastids. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thompson, A.; Jackson, A.; Parker, R.; Morpeth, D.R.; Burbidge, A.; Taylor, I.B. Abscisic acid biosynthesis in tomato: Regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase mRNAs by light/dark cycles, water stress and abscisic acid. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 42, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, N.; Fang, W.; Han, H.; Sui, N.; Li, B.; Meng, Q.W. Overexpression of zeaxanthin epoxidase gene enhances the sensitivity of tomato PSII photoinhibition to high light and chilling stress. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chang, L.; Zhang, T.; An, J.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Sha, X.; Hu, T.; et al. MsZEP, a novel zeaxanthin epoxidase gene from alfalfa (Medicago sativa), confers drought and salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 35, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jahns, P.; Latowski, D.; Strzalka, K. Mechanism and regulation of the violaxanthin cycle: The role of antenna proteins and membrane lipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2009, 1787, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, H.; Yang, J.; He, Y.; Yang, X.; Fu, C.; Zhang, D.; Dong, J.; Zeb, A.; Qu, J.; Shen, S. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen of Ulva prolifera is involved in the response to temperature stress. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2024, 42, 1227–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, Y.; Ma, Y.; Du, Y.; Shen, S. Differential gene expression for carotenoid biosynthesis in a green alga Ulva prolifera based on transcriptome analysis. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Bairoch, A.; Wilkins, M.R.; Duvaud, S.; Appel, R.D. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, M.; Kang, J.; Kang, Y.; Kang, B.S.; Jin, E. Loss of function in zeaxanthin epoxidase of Dunaliella tertiolecta caused by a single amino acid mutation within the substrate-binding site. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vecchi, V.; Barera, S.; Bassi, R.; Dall’Osto, L. Potential and challenges of improving photosynthesis in algae. Plants 2020, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Takaichi, S. Carotenoids in algae: Distributions, biosyntheses and functions. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1101–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, Y.; Ye, Y.; Shen, S. Effects of light and salinity on carotenoid biosynthesis in Ulva prolifera. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2020, 39, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rodríguez, F.-E.; Laporte, D.; González, A.; Mendez, K.N.; Castro-Nallar, E.; Meneses, C.; Huidobro-Toro, J.P.; Moenne, A. Copper-Induced increased expression of genes involved in photosynthesis, carotenoid synthesis and C assimilation in the marine alga Ulva compressa. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ruban, A.; Berera, R.; Ilioaia, C.; van Stokkum, I.H.M.; Kennis, J.T.M.; Pascal, A.A.; van Amerongen, H.; Robert, B.; Horton, P.; van Grondelle, R. Identification of a mechanism of photoprotective energy dissipation in higher plants. Nature 2007, 450, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Johnson, M.; Pérez-Bueno, M.; Zia, A.; Horton, P.; Ruban, A. The zeaxanthin-independent and zeaxanthin-dependent qE components of nonphotochemical quenching involve common conformational changes within the photosystem II antenna in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1061–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Campbell, D.; Xie, X.; Gao, S.; Gu, W.; Pan, G.; Wang, G. Desiccation induces accumulations of antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin in intertidal macro-alga Ulva pertusa (Chlorophyta). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, S.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, G.; Cock, M. Slow zeaxanthin accumulation and the enhancement of CP26 collectively contribute to an atypical non-photochemical quenching in macroalga Ulva prolifera under high light. J. Phycol. 2020, 56, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dautermann, O.; Lohr, M. A functional zeaxanthin epoxidase from red algae shedding light on the evolution of light-harvesting carotenoids and the xanthophyll cycle in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Plant J. 2017, 92, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Eilers, U.; Dietzel, L.; Breitenbach, J.; Büchel, C.; Sandmann, G. Identification of genes coding for functional zeaxanthin epoxidases in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 192, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, M.; Ding, W.; Pan, Y.; Hu, H.; Liu, J. Zeaxanthin epoxidase is involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis and light-dependent growth of the marine alga Nannochloropsis oceanica. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2023, 16, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, M.; Kang, Y.; Jin, E. Gene expression analysis of zeaxanthin epoxidase from the marine microalga Dunaliella tertiolecta in response to light/dark cycle and salinity. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 1453–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, H.; Hoang, M.; Jeon, Y.; Wu, G.; Lee, C. Differential down-regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidation in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars with different chilling sensitivities. J. Plant Biol. 2017, 60, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hoang, M.; Kim, H.; Zulfugarov, I.; Lee, C. Down-Regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidation in vascular plant leaves under normal and photooxidative stress conditions. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 63, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Park, H.-Y.; Seok, H.-Y.; Park, B.-K.; Kim, S.H.; Goh, C.H.; Lee, B.H.; Lee, C.H.; Moon, Y.H. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ZEP enhances tolerance to osmotic stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 375, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kishimoto, M.; Shimajiri, Y.; Oshima, A.; Hase, A.; Mikami, K.; Akama, K. Functional expression of an animal type-Na+-ATPase gene from a marine red seaweed Porphyra yezoensis increases salinity tolerance in rice plants. Plant Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relative content of xanthophylls in U. prolifera. (A) Lutein content; (B) Zeaxanthin content; (C) Violaxanthin content; (D) Antheraxanthin content; (E) De-epoxidation state, Z/(V + A + Z); (F) De-epoxidation state, (Z + 0.5A)/(V + A + Z). Zeaxanthin, Z; Violaxanthin, V; Antheraxanthin, A. 25‰, control group; 50‰, high-salt stress. Values are means ± SD (n = 3; compared with 25‰, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test). All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Figure 1. Relative content of xanthophylls in U. prolifera. (A) Lutein content; (B) Zeaxanthin content; (C) Violaxanthin content; (D) Antheraxanthin content; (E) De-epoxidation state, Z/(V + A + Z); (F) De-epoxidation state, (Z + 0.5A)/(V + A + Z). Zeaxanthin, Z; Violaxanthin, V; Antheraxanthin, A. 25‰, control group; 50‰, high-salt stress. Values are means ± SD (n = 3; compared with 25‰, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test). All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Biology 13 00695 g001
Figure 2. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of UpZEP with other ZEPs. The residues that are identical in more than 80% of all the sequences are shaded in gray. The conserved residues are shaded in black. The FAD domain is indicated with a black underline, and the FHA domain is indicated with a red underline. The species and corresponding GenBank accession number are as follows: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (AAO48940.1); Dunaliella tertiolecta (AZK89898.2); Haematococcus lacustris (GFH20616.1); Oryza sativa (BAB39765.1); Arabidopsis thaliana (AAG38877.1).
Figure 2. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of UpZEP with other ZEPs. The residues that are identical in more than 80% of all the sequences are shaded in gray. The conserved residues are shaded in black. The FAD domain is indicated with a black underline, and the FHA domain is indicated with a red underline. The species and corresponding GenBank accession number are as follows: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (AAO48940.1); Dunaliella tertiolecta (AZK89898.2); Haematococcus lacustris (GFH20616.1); Oryza sativa (BAB39765.1); Arabidopsis thaliana (AAG38877.1).
Biology 13 00695 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of ZEPs from several Plants, Chlorophyta, Rhodophyta, Bacillariophyta and Cyanobacteria. The neighbor-joining method was used to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees using the MEGA6 software (Bootstrap value = 1000). UpZEP refers to U. prolifera. The GenBank IDR is shown right after each species name.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of ZEPs from several Plants, Chlorophyta, Rhodophyta, Bacillariophyta and Cyanobacteria. The neighbor-joining method was used to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees using the MEGA6 software (Bootstrap value = 1000). UpZEP refers to U. prolifera. The GenBank IDR is shown right after each species name.
Biology 13 00695 g003
Figure 4. Expression levels of the UpZEP gene under different salinity conditions at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h. The 25‰ condition represents the control group and the 50‰ condition represents high-salt stress. The values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3; compared with 25‰, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 4. Expression levels of the UpZEP gene under different salinity conditions at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h. The 25‰ condition represents the control group and the 50‰ condition represents high-salt stress. The values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3; compared with 25‰, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Biology 13 00695 g004
Figure 5. Verification experiment of yeast phenotypes. Yeast strains transformed with empty vector pYESR2 were used as the control group. Yeast strains transformed with recombinant vector pYESR2-UpZEP were used as the experimental group. Transformants of pYESR2 and pYESR2-UpZEP were grown in SG-Ura medium supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl.
Figure 5. Verification experiment of yeast phenotypes. Yeast strains transformed with empty vector pYESR2 were used as the control group. Yeast strains transformed with recombinant vector pYESR2-UpZEP were used as the experimental group. Transformants of pYESR2 and pYESR2-UpZEP were grown in SG-Ura medium supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl.
Biology 13 00695 g005
Figure 6. Validation of transgenic C. reinhardtii and the expression pattern of the UpZEP gene under high-salt stress. (A) Validation of transgenic UpZEP-positive clones using gel electrophoresis: 1, wild-type C. reinhardtii; 2, transgenic UpZEP-positive C. reinhardtii. (B) Expression levels of the UpZEP gene under high-salt stress. CK, control group; NaCl, 120 mM. The values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3; compared with CK, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Figure 6. Validation of transgenic C. reinhardtii and the expression pattern of the UpZEP gene under high-salt stress. (A) Validation of transgenic UpZEP-positive clones using gel electrophoresis: 1, wild-type C. reinhardtii; 2, transgenic UpZEP-positive C. reinhardtii. (B) Expression levels of the UpZEP gene under high-salt stress. CK, control group; NaCl, 120 mM. The values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3; compared with CK, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Biology 13 00695 g006
Figure 7. The biomass and chlorophyll content in C. reinhardtii under high-salt stress. Transgenic and wild-type (WT) C. reinhardtii phenotypes (A), biomass measurements (B) and chlorophyll content (C). WT, control group. The values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3; compared with WT, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, Student’s t-test).
Figure 7. The biomass and chlorophyll content in C. reinhardtii under high-salt stress. Transgenic and wild-type (WT) C. reinhardtii phenotypes (A), biomass measurements (B) and chlorophyll content (C). WT, control group. The values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3; compared with WT, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, Student’s t-test).
Biology 13 00695 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, H.; Yang, X.; Zeb, A.; Liu, J.; Gu, H.; Yang, J.; Xiang, W.; Shen, S. Cloning and Functional Analysis of a Zeaxanthin Epoxidase Gene in Ulva prolifera. Biology 2024, 13, 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090695

AMA Style

He H, Yang X, Zeb A, Liu J, Gu H, Yang J, Xiang W, Shen S. Cloning and Functional Analysis of a Zeaxanthin Epoxidase Gene in Ulva prolifera. Biology. 2024; 13(9):695. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090695

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Hongyan, Xiuwen Yang, Aurang Zeb, Jiasi Liu, Huiyue Gu, Jieru Yang, Wenyu Xiang, and Songdong Shen. 2024. "Cloning and Functional Analysis of a Zeaxanthin Epoxidase Gene in Ulva prolifera" Biology 13, no. 9: 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090695

APA Style

He, H., Yang, X., Zeb, A., Liu, J., Gu, H., Yang, J., Xiang, W., & Shen, S. (2024). Cloning and Functional Analysis of a Zeaxanthin Epoxidase Gene in Ulva prolifera. Biology, 13(9), 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090695

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop