Next Article in Journal
Changes in Competitors, Stress Tolerators, and Ruderals (CSR) Ecological Strategies after the Introduction of Shrubs and Trees in Disturbed Semiarid Steppe Grasslands in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia
Previous Article in Journal
Evidence of Considerable Shifts in Catch Composition in the Artisanal Spiny Lobster Fishery in Kenya
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/biology12121478
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolutionary Plasticity in Insular Lizard, Adapting over Reproduction, Metabolism, and Color Variation

by
Domenico Fulgione
1,
Valeria Maselli
1,*,
Eleonora Rivieccio
2,
Serena Aceto
1,
Marco Salvemini
1 and
Maria Buglione
1
1
Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Humanities Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(12), 1478; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121478
Submission received: 24 October 2023 / Revised: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 27 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Zoology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The recent debate on the theory of evolution focuses on various aspects that arise following the evidence of the advancement of knowledge in genetics and molecular biology. In particular, some researchers are inclined to introduce an extended evolutionary theory involving this hypothesis. Many theoretical hypotheses are based on the ever-increasing knowledge of phenotypic plasticity as well as epigenetic mechanisms. In particular, plasticity increases the complexity of the selection–phenotype–genotype interaction, and the collection of cases deriving from empirical experiments helps understand its role. The case of the blue lizard on islets is particularly intriguing due to the speed of its evolution and the modulation of the genome that make these populations a model of plasticity. We have highlighted the adaptive role of regulation of the genome in tissues such as the brain and testis. This would happen because the phenotype adapted to island life is characterized by inter-individual and sexual interaction behaviors that are controlled by genes differentially expressed in these two districts.

Abstract

The Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) living on islets exhibits a melanic skin coloration and a suite of adaptive traits lacking in nearby mainland populations. On islets, the unpredictable environmental conditions and highly fluctuating population densities are believed to have produced reversed island syndrome (RIS). Several physiological, behavioral, and life-history changes based on the RIS could result from positive selection on increased activity of melanocortins. We hypothesize that phenotypes on islets are the product of a plastic variation depending on the regulation of specific genes. Focusing on control systems that determine the insular-adapted phenotype, we demonstrated that reproductive markers, involved in the hypothalamus–hypophysis–gonadal axis, and metabolism markers, flags for hypophysis-melanocortin receptors, are all up-regulated in island lizards under the RIS. This behavior, combined with the observed limited variation in the mitochondrial genome, agrees with the hypothesis that plasticity enables populations to persist in novel environmental conditions and that over time, natural selection will “fine-tune” the population to the environment by modifying the phenotype under selection. We believe that analysis of the transcriptome and the single gene expression, such that all the variations observed in the island populations, can be useful to shed light on evolutionary plasticity as a process affecting animals’ populations in general.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) is a lacertid that includes several species endemic to Mediterranean islands [1]. Some of them living on islets sometimes exhibit a clear melanic skin coloration lacking in nearby lizard populations living both on the mainland and on large islands, which generally show a wild-type coloration with a white abdomen and green spots on the dorsal side (Figure 1A,B).
In lizards, morphological and chromatic morphs are rather common [2,3,4], and lizards’ skin coloration is exactly what mainly attracts taxonomists. In the past, in some old investigations, these different chromatic variants were attributed to various, and sometimes bizarre, reasons, such as the Sun’s power, the type of rocks, and diet, linked to the environmental conditions of the islet [5]. Nowadays, a total of 52 subspecies are named [6,7,8]. Some of them live on islets close to the mainland, which houses the nominal species. These divergent phenotypes occur despite the occasional passage of individuals in this narrow stretch of sea, which is highly probable, as suggested by the natural and anthropic materials observable on the facing banks of the island and mainland.
Previous studies on the wall lizards, in addition to the analysis of skin melanization [9], show the variation in a wide range of characteristics, including skull shape and sexual dimorphism [10,11], egg size and plasma dihydrotestosterone levels [12], microbiota [13], and immunocompetence [14], providing more and more evidence to support the hypothesis that insular lizards resort to a precise adaptive strategy, named Reversed Island Syndrome (RIS) [10]. Lizards living on islets close to the mainland exhibit a suite of traits, including higher food intake rates, increased aggressiveness, strong sexual dimorphism, and more resource allocation into reproduction compared to mainland relatives. The features would be the answer to the environmental variations, which can be severe and unpredictable for animals restricted on an islet, affecting population size and determining an unforeseeable mortality schedule. In particular, in this scenario, the individuals investing in reproduction and expressing sexually selected traits should have higher fitness and better survival [15]. Furthermore, shifting efforts from growth towards reproduction may be a winning strategy under resource limitations and/or conspecific competition [16]. We define the theory “RIS” considering that these observed traits are opposite to high population densities, gigantism, decreased fecundity, reduced territoriality, aggressiveness, delayed sexual maturity, and reduced energy expenditure traditionally involved in island syndrome (IS) [17,18,19,20,21].
The phenotypic variations observed under RIS are manifested in a short evolutionary time [22]. Indeed, Buglione and co-workers estimated the time of the coalescent lineage in mainland-island lizard populations using mtGenomes, showing a low mitochondrial mutation rate in island lizards despite the conspicuous phenotypic changes. In addition, transcriptome analyses showed significant differential gene expression between islet and mainland lizard populations [22]. However, these results differ from those of other island lizard populations, suggesting that island-species-specific characteristics can play a relevant role [23].
The knowledge of the molecular and regulatory mechanisms linking environmental influences, functional variation, and the development and evolution of new phenotypes in the wild is still limited [24,25]. Here, we present empirical evidence to corroborate the plasticity hypothesis in island lizards. First of all, we analyze the whole transcriptome of the brain and testis of lizards on the islet and mainland to highlight patterns of expression that differentiate these populations. Then we focus on some indicators of the pathways underlying the behaviors observed in the island lizards, including reproduction, color variations, and metabolism that are generally linked to the melanocortin system as well as to the hypothalamus–hypophysis–gonadal (HHG) axis [26,27,28].
We demonstrate that analysis of the transcriptome and the expression of single genes, such that all the variations observed in the island populations of P. siculus, can be helpful to shed light on evolutionary plasticity as a process affecting animal populations in general.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Samples

In this study, we have considered the nominal population P. s. siculus (Rafinesque-Schmaltz 1810), typically characterized by a white abdomen and a green back (Figure 1A) living on the mainland (Punta Campanella, South Italy), and a melanic island population, P. s. coeruleus (Eimer 1872), showing a blue coloration on the abdomen and other RIS traits (Figure 1B), endemic to Scopolo Faraglione of Capri (South Italy, approximately 0.76 ha, 40°320 N, 14°150 E). We used two adult male lizards for each population, aged according to snout-vent length (SVL), which is correlated with age [29], and tried to minimize the impact on the populations by using lizards that died accidentally during sampling.
The animals were kept according to the authorization by the Ministry of the Environment and Protection of Land and Sea (also known as MATTM) (prot. 4363/2015). Experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments, University of Naples Federico II (ID: 2013/0096988), according to Italian law.

2.2. RNA Isolation

In this study, we analyzed RNA-seq data for mainland and island lizards derived from [30].
The RNA was isolated from the brain and testis tissues of island and mainland lizards. RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kits (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Libraries were 2 × 100 paired-end sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.3. Transcriptome Analyses

The quality of raw sequencing reads was evaluated using FastQC software (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ accessed on 15 September 2023), followed by trimming of low-quality reads and Illumina adapters using Trimmomatic (v0.33) [31]. The high-quality reads were used as input to perform de novo transcriptome assembly using Trinity (v2.1.1) [32], as described in [33].
The quality of the assembled transcriptome was assessed by the BUSCO v3 pipeline [34], and the level of chimeric transcripts was determined by standalone BLASTn analysis using as a reference the P. muralis genome dataset [35].
Transcript annotation was performed using Annocript [36].

2.4. Differential Gene Expression between Populations

Transcript-level quantification in the testis and brain of each sample was performed by RSEM software [37] and the Bowtie aligner [38], implemented in the Trinity software package. Differential gene expression was conducted using the edgeR software [39], and the Gene Ontology enrichment analysis (p < 0.05) was performed using Annocript [33,36].

2.5. Verification of Differentially Expressed Genes by Real-Time PCR

To verify the accuracy of the RNA-seq data, we selected the differentially expressed gene encoding the gonadotropin-releasing hormone II receptor-like (GnRH-R2) and confirmed its expression level by real-time PCR.
We designed primers (Table 1) based on GnRH-R2 sequences of P. muralis and P. raffonei (XM_028709494, XM_028709495, XM_053368156, and XM_053368157) obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database.
Starting from 500 ng of total RNA extracted from the brain and testis of the island and mainland P. siculus samples, the first-strand cDNA was obtained using the QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR and sequencing of the GnRH-R2 gene fragment were performed to validate gene expression. Additionally, the expression of the housekeeping actin gene [9] (Table 1) was determined to check the cDNA integrity and used as a control for its constitutive and stable expression in most cells and tissues.
Gene fragments were amplified by touch-down PCR in a final volume of 20 μL, with 0.2 μL of Pfu DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 4 μL of 4× Tris buffer with MgCl2, 1.6 μL of dNTPs (each dNTP 2.5 μM), 0.2 μL of 50 μM of each primer, and 100 ng of cDNA template under the following conditions: an initial denaturing step of 98 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 10 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 55–63 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; and a final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C. The amplification products from P. siculus were gel excised, cleaned up using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA), and sequenced. Chromatograms were assembled using the software Geneious Prime 14, and sequences were analyzed with GenBank BLASTn and BLASTx (BLAST, basic local alignment search tool) to confirm the identity of the fragments. All sequence data generated in this study were deposited in GenBank.
Additionally, we performed real-time PCR on P. siculus samples in a Rotor-Gene Q cycler (Qiagen, USA) using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, USA). The reaction was prepared in a final volume of 25 μL, with 50 ng of cDNA, 1 mM of each primer, and 12.5 μL of QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (2×). The PCR cycling profile consisted of a cycle at 95 °C for 5 min, 40 three-step cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, at 60 °C for 20 s, and at 72 °C for 20 s. The actin gene was used to normalize the relative expression (Table 1). At the end of each test, a melting curve analysis was done (plate read every 0.5 °C from 55 to 95 °C) to determine the formation of the specific products. Each sample was tested and run in technical duplicates.
Relative quantification analysis was conducted using the 2−(∆∆Ct) method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). Relative mRNA fold change in gene expression was compared, setting y = 1. Statistical significance of the differential expression was assessed using a Kruskal–Wallis test, and data with p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Paired-end sequencing of the RNA extracted from the P. siculus brain and testis produced 285,765,062 raw reads. After a quality check, we assembled 239,063,200 high-quality reads and generated a reference transcriptome (Table 2).
An overall analysis of the gene expression pattern of the brain and testis showed two gene clusters for which a clear difference is observed in the up- and down-regulated genes, both considering population and tissues (Figure 2). Cluster 1 shows generalized up-regulation in the brain, whereas genes of Cluster 2 behave in the opposite way (Figure 2).
Differentially expressed genes are detected both in brain and testis samples. Considering the latter, the analysis showed 11,778 genes differentially expressed between mainland and island lizards, with 4500 up-regulated and 7278 down-regulated in the island population compared to the mainland population (Figure 3A). The analysis of the testis transcriptome showed the total number of genes differentially expressed between mainland and island lizards to be 7120, with 2283 up-regulated and 4837 down-regulated in the island population compared to the mainland population (Figure 3B).
Among the significantly up-regulated genes (FDR < 0.005, p < 0.02) that emerged from analyzing the island brain samples, the GO enrichment revealed functional classes of biological processes (BP) belonging to translation, mitochondrial activity, glucose homeostasis, and transcription regulation. In contrast, among the significantly down-regulated genes (FDR < 0.005, p < 0.02), the enriched GO terms belong to cell adhesion, learning, synaptic transmission, and nervous system development. No GO-significantly enriched categories were found among the testis differentially expressed genes.
To reveal a possible role of the genes involved in the HHG axis in the strategy based on adaptive plasticity, we focused on 14 differentially expressed genes in the brain and testis of island and mainland lizards, as more intuitively shown in the heat map (Table 3 and Figure 4).
The clustering relationship between the populations was close for both tissues, and most of the gene expression patterns between the populations were very different. Some genes that were highly expressed in insular lizards showed low expression levels in the mainland population, and vice versa (Figure 4). All these genes are significantly up-regulated in the brain tissue of the island population, with a logFC ranging from ~2 to 5, while some of them (TCDD-inducible poly ADP-ribose polymerase, protein/nucleic acid deglycase DJ-1, neurabin-2, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone II receptor) are also up-regulated in the testis of insular lizards (logFC from ~3 to 7).
The differentially expressed genes detected through in silico and real-time PCR analyses trace a phenotypic profile in agreement with observations on the RIS of island populations.
The reproductive investment, observed in behaviors and hormone levels of insular lizards, can be corroborated by a significant differential expression in the GnRH-R2 gene (Figure 5A), which is interestingly correlated to higher male dihydrotestosterone levels (Figure 5B), as already assessed in our previous analyses. Following this correlation, we can also interpret the expression of the Eukaryotic elongation factor 2 gene (EF2) that in the testes plays a role in meiosis useful for sperm production (Figure 4), as well as the expression of the DJ-1 gene, which acts as a regulatory subunit of a 400 kDa RNA-binding protein complex and also modulates androgen receptor-dependent transcriptional activity by binding and blocking transcriptional repressors, such as PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription)xa and DJBP (DJ-1-binding protein) [40,41] (Figure 4).
Behavioral observations of hungry and voracious lizards, both in experimental contexts and in the wild, are linked to genes controlling food intake, such as leptin (Figure 5C) and neuropeptide Y (Figure 5D), and also to the melanocortin level. Indeed, the pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) gene is differentially expressed in the brain tissue of island and mainland samples, showing a significant logFC 3.7. This indicates that the POMC gene is approximately 13-fold more expressed in the brains of island lizards than in those of mainland ones (Figure 5E). Accordingly, the plasma concentration of MSH (melanocyte-stimulating hormone) is higher in island lizards (Figure 5F).

4. Discussion

The debate on phenotypic plasticity inevitably explores the limits of action we give to evolution by natural selection. For this reason, the discussion has been variously articulated, showing opposing points of view: traditional standard evolutionary theory (SET) and extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) [42,43]. There is no need to divide over which of the two processes should be considered predominant, and to appropriately address these topics, it is crucial to collect empirical evidence on species or populations that express plastic variations by defining the magnitude of the selection and the timing of the change [22]. In particular, the phenotypic variations based on the structural changes of the genomes, or on modulations of gene expression, are widely understudied in the evolutionary and ecological genomics of natural populations [44]. From an evolutionary point of view, this leads to a knowledge gap in our understanding of the molecular mechanism of adaptation.
In this scenario, our results are both useful for understanding the involvement of differential expression in natural populations under selection and answering the appropriate question: What are the adaptive traits that respond to natural selection? Indeed, sometimes divergent phenotypes are characterized by a series of more or less related traits that are differently responsible for coping with selection pressure.
Our lizards show phenotypes adapted to insular life and, at the same time, manifest marked skin melanization [9]. The latter, although very striking, does not seem to be a direct response to selection; instead, it is a spandrel [10], which derives from more effective adaptive traits involved in breeding, metabolism, immunity, and growth [10,12,13,14].
In this work, we highlighted how the insular phenotype is regulated by a set of differentially expressed genes and their correlation to reproductive investment and the rapid exploitation of fleeting energetic resources on an island [30].
Focusing on the control systems that determine the insular-adapted phenotype, we demonstrated that the reproductive markers involved in the HHG axis and the metabolism markers—all signals involved in hypophysis-melanocortin receptors—are all up-regulated in insular lizards.
The products that are involved in the pathway of these systems are GNRH (which activates the production of sex hormones) [45] and the POMC gene, which produces the melanocortins (α-, β-, and γ-MSH and AdrenoCorticoTropic Hormone) [28]. They are both up-regulated in the island lizards’ brains if compared to the mainland lizards.
Similarly to GNRH, over 14 genes involved in the reproductive system are up-regulated in the brain and testis. This pattern is correlated to high testosterone levels during the whole year and to a large inventory of pre-mating reproductive behaviors [10,12].
Differential expression of POMC, up-regulated in the island lizards’ brains, can be interpreted considering the aggressive behaviors, pronounced food intake, and melanization of the skin.
The propensity of lacertids to adapt, both plastically and quickly, to environmental modification has been widely observed. For example, Eremias multiocellata, exposed to increased temperature variability, produces offspring characterized by higher metabolic and growth rates [46]. Yet, hatchling Anolis sagrei in terraria with broad available surfaces, after only 5 months, develops relatively longer hindlimbs compared to lizards living on narrow surfaces [47]. This finding suggests phenotypic plasticity is not related to one specific trait but leads to the production of several phenotypes that are appropriate to particular environments.
Our experimental evidence is particularly important because it defines a set of phenotypical traits useful to face the selective pressure of insular environments. Furthermore, the modulation of these characteristics would make the lizards persistent in the selective insular conditions, waiting for a random mutation that makes their genomes structurally suitable to face the selection [48].
Different known mechanisms act interactively to regulate gene expression in order to keep it in tune with physiological adjustments to the environment [49,50]. Among these, the role of endocrine hormones and DNA methylation has received, and is receiving, special attention in the context of developmental plasticity (see [51,52]).
Our evidence agrees with Baldwin’s hypothesis [53], which affirms that plasticity enables populations to persist in novel environmental conditions and that over time, natural selection will “fine-tune” the population to the environment by modifying the range or average phenotype of the plastic response [53,54,55].

5. Conclusions

The populations of small islands, placed close to the mainland, are an extraordinary evolutionary model to investigate the short-term solutions useful to deal with natural selection.
The first formulation of the RIS hypothesis for these populations suggested that, in an unpredictable environment, it was crucial to invest in reproduction and, consequently, in metabolism to anticipate the advent of the next generation. The striking pigmentation is just a consequence of this adaptation. With this contribution, we have provided evidence to better investigate the development of these adaptations.
Here, we highlighted that the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal and pituitary-melanocortin pathways were the root of all the adaptive phenotypic variations. Furthermore, the adaptive pathways involving metabolism, reproduction, and color are based on the differential expression of key genes. Although this consideration does not completely clarify this matter, it traces the line of investigation to delve deeper, and also suggests that the phenomenon is based on the species’ plasticity, which will probably be fixed by structural changes. The persistence of lizard populations on small islands recalls the theme of the colonization of new environments due to the plastic properties of the populations. Future investigations may also clarify this intriguing aspect.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.F., V.M. and M.B.; data curation, D.F., V.M., E.R., S.A., M.S. and M.B.; formal analysis, V.M., E.R., S.A. and M.B.; investigation, D.F., V.M. and M.B.; methodology, D.F., S.A. and M.B.; project administration, D.F.; resources, D.F. and M.B.; supervision, D.F.; validation, V.M. and M.B.; visualization, D.F. and M.B.; writing—original draft, D.F., V.M., E.R., S.A., M.S. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, D.F., V.M., E.R., S.A., M.S. and M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by Program of Funding of University Research (FRA) 2022 of University of Naples Federico II, principal investigator Maria Buglione PG/2023/0117399 del 29/09/2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animals were kept according to the authorzation by the Ministry of the Environment and Protection of Land and Sea (also known as MATTM) (prot. 4363/2015). Experimental procedures were approved by the Ethica Comittee for Animal Experiments, University of Naples Federico II (ID: 2013/0096988), and according to Italian law.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

RNA-seq data for mainland and island lizards were deposited in NCBI BioProject PRJNA320862 and PRJNA1041776. Nucleotide sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number OR818494.

Acknowledgments

We thank the municipality of Capri (Capri Island, Naples, Italy) for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnold, E.N. Relationships of the Palaearctic Lizards Assigned to the Genera Lacerta, Algyroides and Psammodromus (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. 1973, 25, 291–366. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sacchi, R.; Scali, S.; Pupin, F.; Gentilli, A.; Galeotti, P.; Fasola, M. Microgeographic Variation of Colour Morph Frequency and Biometry of Common Wall Lizards. J. Zool. 2007, 273, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vercken, E.; Massot, M.; Sinervo, B.; Clobert, J. Colour Variation and Alternative Reproductive Strategies in Females of the Common Lizard Lacerta Vivipara. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arnold, N. Collins Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Britain and Europe; Collins; New edition; Harper Collins: London, UK, 2002; ISBN 978-0-00-219964-3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Eimer, T. Untersuchungen über das Variiren der Mauereidechse: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie von der Entwicklung aus Constitutionellen Ursachen, Sowie zum Darwinismus; Nicolai (R. Stricker): Berlin, Germany, 1881. [Google Scholar]
  6. Podnar, M.; Mayer, W.; Tvrtković, N. Phylogeography of the Italian Wall Lizard, Podarcis Sicula, as Revealed by Mitochondrial DNA Sequences: Phylogeography of the Italian Wall Lizard. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Amori, G.; Angelici, F.; Frugis, S.; Gandol, G.; Groppali, R.; Lanza, B.; Relini, G.; Vicini, G. Vertebrata. In Checklist Delle Specie Della Fauna d’Italia; Calderini: Bologna, Italy, 1993; Volume 110, ISBN 88-7019-770-0. [Google Scholar]
  8. Corti, C.; Lo Cascio, P.; Böhme, W. The Lizards of Italy and Adjacent Areas; Frankfurt Contributions to Natural History/Frankfurter Beiträge zur Naturkunde; Edition Chimaira: Totnes, UK, 2002; Volume 14, ISBN 978-3-930612-68-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fulgione, D.; Lega, C.; Trapanese, M.; Buglione, M. Genetic Factors Implied in Melanin-based Coloration of the Italian Wall Lizard. J. Zool. 2015, 296, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raia, P.; Guarino, F.M.; Turano, M.; Polese, G.; Rippa, D.; Carotenuto, F.; Monti, D.M.; Cardi, M.; Fulgione, D. The Blue Lizard Spandrel and the Island Syndrome. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bruschi, S.; Cipolla, R.; Corti, C.; Nappi, A. Notes on the Morphology of Podarcis sicula coerulea Compared to Other Nearby Islands and Mainland Populations of P. sicula. In Proceedings of the Atti del 6° Congresso Nazionale della Societas Herpetologica Italica; Stilgrafica: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Monti, D.M.; Raia, P.; Vroonen, J.; Maselli, V.; Van Damme, R.; Fulgione, D. Physiological Change in an Insular Lizard Population Confirms the Reversed Island Syndrome: Physiology in Insular Lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 2013, 108, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Buglione, M.; Ricca, E.; Petrelli, S.; Baccigalupi, L.; Troiano, C.; Saggese, A.; Rivieccio, E.; Fulgione, D. Gut Microbiota Plasticity in Insular Lizards under Reversed Island Syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baeckens, S.; Van Damme, R. Immunocompetence and Parasite Infestation in a Melanistic and Normally-Coloured Population of the Lacertid Lizard, Podarcis Siculus. Amphib.-Reptil. 2018, 39, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shuster, S.M.; Wade, M.J. Mating Systems and Strategies; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-0-691-20688-2. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cooper, W.E.; Dimopoulos, I.; Pafilis, P. Sex, Age, and Population Density Affect Aggressive Behaviors in Island Lizards Promoting Cannibalism. Ethology 2015, 121, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lack, D. Competition for Food by Birds of Prey. J. Anim. Ecol. 1946, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adler, G.H.; Levins, R. The Island Syndrome in Rodent Populations. Q. Rev. Biol. 1994, 69, 473–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Blondel, J. Evolution and Ecology of Birds on Islands: Trends and Prospects. Vie Milieu 2000, 50, 205–220. [Google Scholar]
  20. McNab, B.K. Minimizing Energy Expenditure Facilitates Vertebrate Persistence on Oceanic Islands. Ecol. Lett. 2002, 5, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Postma, E.; Van Noordwijk, A.J. Gene Flow Maintains a Large Genetic Difference in Clutch Size at a Small Spatial Scale. Nature 2005, 433, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Buglione, M.; Petrelli, S.; Maselli, V.; Trapanese, M.; Salvemini, M.; Aceto, S.; Di Cosmo, A.; Fulgione, D. Fixation of Genetic Variation and Optimization of Gene Expression: The Speed of Evolution in Isolated Lizard Populations Undergoing Reverse Island Syndrome. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rotger, A.; Tenan, S.; Igual, J.; Bonner, S.; Tavecchia, G. Life Span, Growth, Senescence and Island Syndrome: Accounting for Imperfect Detection and Continuous Growth. J. Anim. Ecol. 2023, 92, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lewis, J.J.; Reed, R.D. Genome-Wide Regulatory Adaptation Shapes Population-Level Genomic Landscapes in Heliconius. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Verta, J.-P.; Jones, F.C. Predominance of Cis-Regulatory Changes in Parallel Expression Divergence of Sticklebacks. eLife 2019, 8, e43785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Coraggio, F.; Valiante, S.; Scudiero, R.; Laforgia, V.; Andreuccetti, P.; Agnese, M. PACAP and PAC1 Receptor in the Reproductive Cycle of Male Lizard Podarcis Sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 205, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Agnese, M.; Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Coraggio, F.; Valiante, S.; Scudiero, R.; Laforgia, V.; Andreuccetti, P. The VIP/VPACR System in the Reproductive Cycle of Male Lizard Podarcis sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 205, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ducrest, A.; Keller, L.; Roulin, A. Pleiotropy in the Melanocortin System, Coloration and Behavioural Syndromes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Meiri, S. Length–Weight Allometries in Lizards. J. Zool. 2010, 281, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Trapanese, M.; Buglione, M.; Maselli, V.; Petrelli, S.; Aceto, S.; Fulgione, D. The First Transcriptome of Italian Wall Lizard, a New Tool to Infer about the Island Syndrome. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A Flexible Trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-Length Transcriptome Assembly from RNA-Seq Data without a Reference Genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Petrella, V.; Aceto, S.; Musacchia, F.; Colonna, V.; Robinson, M.; Benes, V.; Cicotti, G.; Bongiorno, G.; Gradoni, L.; Volf, P.; et al. De Novo Assembly and Sex-Specific Transcriptome Profiling in the Sand Fly Phlebotomus perniciosus (Diptera, Phlebotominae), a Major Old World Vector of Leishmania Infantum. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Waterhouse, R.M.; Seppey, M.; Simão, F.A.; Manni, M.; Ioannidis, P.; Klioutchnikov, G.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO Applications from Quality Assessments to Gene Prediction and Phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Andrade, P.; Pinho, C.; Pérez i de Lanuza, G.; Afonso, S.; Brejcha, J.; Rubin, C.-J.; Wallerman, O.; Pereira, P.; Sabatino, S.J.; Bellati, A.; et al. Regulatory Changes in Pterin and Carotenoid Genes Underlie Balanced Color Polymorphisms in the Wall Lizard. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 5633–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Musacchia, F.; Basu, S.; Petrosino, G.; Salvemini, M.; Sanges, R. Annocript: A Flexible Pipeline for the Annotation of Transcriptomes Able to Identify Putative Long Noncoding RNAs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2199–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate Transcript Quantification from RNA-Seq Data with or without a Reference Genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Langmead, B.; Trapnell, C.; Pop, M.; Salzberg, S.L. Ultrafast and Memory-Efficient Alignment of Short DNA Sequences to the Human Genome. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor Package for Differential Expression Analysis of Digital Gene Expression Data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takahashi, K.; Taira, T.; Niki, T.; Seino, C.; Iguchi-Ariga, S.M.M.; Ariga, H. DJ-1 Positively Regulates the Androgen Receptor by Impairing the Binding of PIASxα to the Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 37556–37563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Niki, T.; Takahashi-Niki, K.; Taira, T.; Iguchi-Ariga, S.M.M.; Ariga, H. DJBP: A Novel DJ-1-Binding Protein, Negatively Regulates the Androgen Receptor by Recruiting Histone Deacetylase Complex, and DJ-1 Antagonizes This Inhibition by Abrogation of This Complex. Mol. Cancer Res. 2003, 1, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Pigliucci, M.; Müller, G.B. Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. In Evolution—The Extended Synthesis; Pigliucci, M., Müller, G.B., Eds.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-262-51367-8. [Google Scholar]
  43. Laland, K.; Uller, T.; Feldman, M.; Sterelny, K.; Müller, G.B.; Moczek, A.; Jablonka, E.; Odling-Smee, J.; Wray, G.A.; Hoekstra, H.E.; et al. Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? Nature 2014, 514, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hill, M.S.; Vande Zande, P.; Wittkopp, P.J. Molecular and Evolutionary Processes Generating Variation in Gene Expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 22, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rosati, L.; Agnese, M.; Di Lorenzo, M.; Barra, T.; Valiante, S.; Prisco, M. Spermatogenesis and Regulatory Factors in the Wall Lizard Podarcis Sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2020, 298, 113579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, L.; Sun, B.; Cao, P.; Li, X.; Du, W. Phenotypic Plasticity May Help Lizards Cope with Increasingly Variable Temperatures. Oecologia 2018, 187, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Losos, J.B.; Creer, D.A.; Glossip, D.; Goellner, R.; Hampton, A.; Roberts, G.; Haskell, N.; Taylor, P.; Ettling, J. Evolutionary Implications of Phenotypic Plasticity in the Hindlimb of the Lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 2000, 54, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Price, T.D.; Qvarnström, A.; Irwin, D.E. The Role of Phenotypic Plasticity in Driving Genetic Evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Babu, M.M.; Luscombe, N.M.; Aravind, L.; Gerstein, M.; Teichmann, S.A. Structure and Evolution of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yu, H.; Gerstein, M. Genomic Analysis of the Hierarchical Structure of Regulatory Networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14724–14731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Moczek, A.P.; Sultan, S.; Foster, S.; Ledón-Rettig, C.; Dworkin, I.; Nijhout, H.F.; Abouheif, E.; Pfennig, D.W. The Role of Developmental Plasticity in Evolutionary Innovation. Proc. R. Soc. B 2011, 278, 2705–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gilbert, S.F.; Epel, D. Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2009; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  53. Baldwin, J.M. A New Factor in Evolution (Continued). Am. Nat. 1896, 30, 536–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Simpson, G.G. The Baldwin Effect. Evolution 1953, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. West-Eberhard, M.J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; ISBN 978-0-19-512234-3. [Google Scholar]
Biology 12 01478 g001
Figure 1. Study area and lizard phenotypes. The insets showed the geographical location of Scopolo, Faraglione of Capri (South Italy). (A) Lizard (Podarcis siculus siculus) showing a wild-type phenotype on mainland and (B) island lizard (Podarcis siculus coeruleus) with a blue melanic phenotype on Scopolo. Photos by Domenico Fulgione.
Figure 1. Study area and lizard phenotypes. The insets showed the geographical location of Scopolo, Faraglione of Capri (South Italy). (A) Lizard (Podarcis siculus siculus) showing a wild-type phenotype on mainland and (B) island lizard (Podarcis siculus coeruleus) with a blue melanic phenotype on Scopolo. Photos by Domenico Fulgione.
Biology 12 01478 g001
Biology 12 01478 g002
Figure 2. Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in the brain and testis of lizards from mainland and island lizards.
Figure 2. Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in the brain and testis of lizards from mainland and island lizards.
Biology 12 01478 g002
Biology 12 01478 g003
Figure 3. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes from (A) the brain and (B) testis of island and mainland lizards. Negative values of logFC (fold changes) represent down-expressed genes, whereas positive values represent up-expressed genes in island samples. Red dots indicate differentially expressed genes with FDR (false discovery rate) < 0.005 and logFC > |2|.
Figure 3. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes from (A) the brain and (B) testis of island and mainland lizards. Negative values of logFC (fold changes) represent down-expressed genes, whereas positive values represent up-expressed genes in island samples. Red dots indicate differentially expressed genes with FDR (false discovery rate) < 0.005 and logFC > |2|.
Biology 12 01478 g003
Biology 12 01478 g004
Figure 4. Heatmap of 14 selected genes involved in the hypothalamus–hypophysis–gonadal axis. The gene expression in each sample is reported as log2 of the reads TMM.
Figure 4. Heatmap of 14 selected genes involved in the hypothalamus–hypophysis–gonadal axis. The gene expression in each sample is reported as log2 of the reads TMM.
Biology 12 01478 g004
Biology 12 01478 g005
Figure 5. Differential gene expression and plasmatic hormone levels indicative of phenotypic processes that reflect differences between island and mainland lizard populations. (A) qRT-PCR of the GNRH gene; (B) plasma levels of the dihydrotestosterone hormone (modified from [12]); (C) differential TMM expression of the gene for Leptin in brain; (D) differential TMM expression of the NPY gene in the brain; (E) differential TMM expression of the POMC gene in brain; (F) plasma levels of MSH hormone (modified from [12]).
Figure 5. Differential gene expression and plasmatic hormone levels indicative of phenotypic processes that reflect differences between island and mainland lizard populations. (A) qRT-PCR of the GNRH gene; (B) plasma levels of the dihydrotestosterone hormone (modified from [12]); (C) differential TMM expression of the gene for Leptin in brain; (D) differential TMM expression of the NPY gene in the brain; (E) differential TMM expression of the POMC gene in brain; (F) plasma levels of MSH hormone (modified from [12]).
Biology 12 01478 g005
Table 1. Primer pairs used to test differential gene expression of the selected gene by real-time PCR.
Table 1. Primer pairs used to test differential gene expression of the selected gene by real-time PCR.
GenePrimer NameSequence Primer 5‘-3‘Amplicon Size (bp)
GnRH-R2GNRH_1524FGTCAATGGAAACCCAACGGC166
GNRH_1689RATGTTGAAGCAGGCGGAAGA
ActinACTINA_PS_RGATCTGGCACCACACCTTCT104
ACTINA_PSC_FTCTTTTCTCTGTTGGCTTTGG
Table 2. Statistics on reference transcriptome.
Table 2. Statistics on reference transcriptome.
Transcripts FPKM > 1373.072
%GC45.04
Average contig length821.89
N50 (bp)1577
Assembled bases (Mbp)307
Table 3. Candidate gene involved in hypothalamus–hypophysis–gonadal axis differentially expressed in the brain and testis of island and mainland lizards.
Table 3. Candidate gene involved in hypothalamus–hypophysis–gonadal axis differentially expressed in the brain and testis of island and mainland lizards.
GeneDescription
GATA3Trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor GATA-3
PAD-DJ-1Parkinsonism associated deglycase
PITX3Pituitary homeobox 2-like
HS71Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein-like isoform X1
tilBLeucine rich repeat containing 6
GnRH-RType 3/II gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor
TRIP4Thyroid hormone receptor interactor 4
STAT3Signal transducer and activator of transcription
EF2Eukaryotic elongation factor 2
RWDRWD domain containing 1
PG4platelet glycoprotein 4 isoform X2
POUPOU domain protein
LEB-1Isoform 6 of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1
Neurabin-2Neurabin-2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fulgione, D.; Maselli, V.; Rivieccio, E.; Aceto, S.; Salvemini, M.; Buglione, M. Evolutionary Plasticity in Insular Lizard, Adapting over Reproduction, Metabolism, and Color Variation. Biology 2023, 12, 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121478

AMA Style

Fulgione D, Maselli V, Rivieccio E, Aceto S, Salvemini M, Buglione M. Evolutionary Plasticity in Insular Lizard, Adapting over Reproduction, Metabolism, and Color Variation. Biology. 2023; 12(12):1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fulgione, Domenico, Valeria Maselli, Eleonora Rivieccio, Serena Aceto, Marco Salvemini, and Maria Buglione. 2023. "Evolutionary Plasticity in Insular Lizard, Adapting over Reproduction, Metabolism, and Color Variation" Biology 12, no. 12: 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop