You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Yanxi Zhao1,2,3,
  • Dengpan Xiao1,2,3,* and
  • Huizi Bai1,*
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Michael H. Böhme Reviewer 2: Ekrem Ozlu

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

interesting paper but needs improvements. please find my comments in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I find that rather than placing comments, authors preferred to ignore most of the suggestions from reviewers. I would suggest authors carefully go over comments provided in the previous round. 

Author Response

We have revised the paper. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

please find my comments on the attached file. these comments must be done before acceptance.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We have revised the paper. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx