Next Article in Journal
An Optimization on the Neuronal Networks Based on the ADEX Biological Model in Terms of LUT-State Behaviors: Digital Design and Realization on FPGA Platforms
Previous Article in Journal
Advances on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilms for the Production of Added-Value Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum

by
Chou Khai Soong Karlson
1,
Siti Nurfadhlina Mohd Noor
2,
Norzulaani Khalid
1,3 and
Boon Chin Tan
1,*
1
Center for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
2
Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics (IMEN), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
3
Institute of Biological Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(8), 1127; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081127
Submission received: 9 July 2022 / Revised: 23 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 27 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Flavonoids are natural compounds in plants. They play a critical role in plant growth and pathogen defense. Due to their health benefits, flavonoids have gained much attention as potent therapeutic agents. However, the low abundance of flavonoids in nature has limited their exploitation. Hence, this study aimed to enhance flavonoid production by silencing the cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H) enzyme using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference (CRISPRi) technology. Our results showed that the C4H-silenced tobacco cells had a lower NtC4H expression level compared to wild-type. This was concurred by the flavonoid analysis, where the accumulation of C4H’s substrate in the C4H-silenced cells was significantly higher than in the wild-type. Our findings provide valuable insight into the future development of CRISPRi to manipulate plant metabolite biosynthesis.

Abstract

Flavonoids are an important class of natural compounds present in plants. However, despite various known biological activities and therapeutic potential, the low abundance of flavonoids in nature limits their development for industrial applications. In this study, we aimed to enhance flavonoid production by silencing cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H), an enzyme involved in the branch point of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway, using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference (CRISPRi) approach. We designed three sgRNAs targeting the promoter region of NtC4H and cloned them into a CRISPRi construct. After being introduced into Nicotiana tabacum cell suspension culture, the transformed cells were sampled for qPCR and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses. Sixteen of 21 cell lines showed PCR-positive, confirming the presence of the CRISPRi transgene. The NtC4H transcript in the transgenic cells was 0.44-fold lower than in the wild-type. In contrast, the flavonoid-related genes in the other branching pathways, such as Nt4CL and NtCHS, in the C4H-silenced cells showed higher expression than wild-type. The upregulation of these genes increased their respective products, including pinostrobin, naringenin, and chlorogenic acid. This study provides valuable insight into the future development of CRISPRi-based metabolic engineering to suppress target genes in plants.

1. Introduction

Flavonoids constitute one of the largest groups of secondary metabolites in plants, encompassing more than 6000 identified compounds [1,2]. Their chemical structure consists of a C6-C3-C6 carbon framework, formed by two aromatic rings and a heterocyclic ring containing one oxygen atom [3]. Flavonoids can be broadly categorized into the following six major subgroups: anthocyanins, chalcones, flavones, flavonols, flavandiols, and proanthocyanidins [4]. Many flavonoids have been shown to play important roles in plants. These include giving color and fragrance to flowers [5], attracting pollinators in fruit for seed dispersal [6], growth and development in seedlings [7], signaling during nodulation and auxin transport [8], as well as protecting plants against abiotic stress (e.g., UV radiation, drought, and salt stress) and biotic stress (e.g., insects and herbivores) [9,10]. The protective effects of plant-derived flavonoids against stress are achieved via the secretion or production of specific flavonoids that act as insect/herbivore repellents, phytoalexins, and reactive oxygen species scavengers [11].
Flavonoids have been shown to exhibit various therapeutic properties, including antibacterial [12], anti-herpes [13], antioxidant [14], anti-inflammatory [15], anti-ulcer [16], anti-cancer [17], anti-aging [18], and anti-diabetic [19]. Besides, flavonoids (panduratin A and 4-hydroxypanduratin A) extracted from Boesenbergia rotunda (medicinal ginger) possess inhibitory activity against Dengue NS2b/3 protease of the dengue virus serotype 2 (DEN-2) [5,20]. This discovery could lead to the potential development of antiviral drugs against dengue since an efficacious antiviral drug has yet to be developed.
In plants, flavonoids are biosynthesized via the general phenylpropanoid pathway (Figure 1), where the processes are tightly regulated by enzymatic reactions [21]. Phenylalanine (synthesized from the shikimate pathway) is the first precursor in the phenylpropanoid pathway. It can be converted to trans-cinnamic acid through a deamination reaction by phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL). Later, trans-cinnamic acid could be converted to p-coumaric acid and cinnamoyl CoA by cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H) and 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL), respectively (Figure 1). Next, chalcone synthase (CHS) catalyzes p-coumaroyl CoA or cinnamoyl CoA by condensing malonyl CoA (derived from acetyl-CoA catalyzed by acetyl-CoA carboxylase) at a ratio of 1:3 to form the chalcone precursor. Chalcone isomerase (CHI) then catalyzes the isomerization of chalcone to flavanones, which can be further modified by several enzymes, such as hydroxylases and methyltransferases, to generate various classes of flavonoids.
Flavonoids are naturally produced in low quantities and are insufficient to meet industrial demands. Furthermore, flavonoid production in plants could be influenced by various factors, such as soil type [22] and climate conditions [23], hindering their potential as valuable candidates for therapeutic applications. However, with a better understanding of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway and the development of genome editing tools, it has become possible to increase flavonoid production through metabolic engineering approaches. Metabolic engineering approaches can be used to (i) increase the activity of rate-limiting enzyme(s) in upstream pathways, (ii) overexpress the first committed enzyme in the pathway, (iii) block the competing pathways downstream of branch points, and (iv) create sink compartments [24]. For instance, increasing the activity of the rate-limiting enzyme (such as CHS) enhanced the flavonoid production in Glycyrrhiza uralensis [25]. Similarly, overexpressing the flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (F3′H) in poplar increased the accumulations of epigallocatechin, gallocatechin, and catechin [26].
In this study, we aimed to enhance flavonoid production by silencing C4H, a cytochrome P450-dependent hydroxylase enzyme (CYP73). We hypothesized that silencing the C4H gene in the branching pathway could shift the metabolic flux to the 4CL route. To test our hypothesis, we used the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference (CRISPRi) to silence NtC4H in Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) and determine its flavonoid production. The CRISPRi silencing system exploits the deactivated variants of the Cas9 enzyme (dCas9), guided by a sgRNA, to form a dCas9/sgRNA complex that is incapable of cleaving DNA but retains its ability to specifically bind to the DNA [27]. This technology has recently gained immediate attention due to the sequence-specific transcriptional regulation it can offer. In this work, we designed three sgRNAs to target the promoter region of NtC4H. These sgRNAs were assembled into a CRISPRi vector and introduced into N. tabacum suspension cells via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. The flavonoids in the C4H-silenced tobacco cells were harvested for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Establishment of Cell Suspension Culture

In vitro N. tabacum L. plantlets obtained from the Plant Biotechnology Research Laboratory, Universiti Malaya were used as explants for callus induction. Under sterile conditions, leaves from N. tabacum were cut into 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm segments and cultured on the callus induction medium containing Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium [28], 0.1 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 0.1 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BAP), 3% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.2% (w/v) Gelrite®. The cultures were incubated at 26 ± 2 °C in darkness until friable whitish calli appeared on the leaf explants. To establish cell suspension cultures, the generated N. tabacum calli (~ 0.5 g) were transferred to a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL TLM [MS basal medium supplemented with 1 mg/L 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 0.04 mg/L kinetin, and 3% (w/v) sucrose] for 21 days. The pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. The cell suspension cultures were agitated at 80 rpm on a rotary shaker and sub-cultured every 14 days by replacing the old medium with a fresh liquid medium at a ratio of 1:4. All cultures were incubated at 26 °C in a growth room under a 16-h light and 8-h dark cycle with a light intensity of 31.4 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by cool fluorescent lights.

2.2. sgRNA Design

The promoter region of the NtC4H gene in N. tabacum was located using the plant promoter prediction program (TSSP) [29]. A 25 nucleotide-specific DNA binding region together with protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence (NGG) at the predicted promoter region were designed for both the template and non-template strands of NtC4H using the sgRNA designation program (CRISPOR) [30]. Three sgRNAs with the highest predicted efficiency score and the lowest off-target mismatch were selected and flanked with EPS3I (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) restriction site.

2.3. Cloning of sgRNAs into Expression Vectors

The construction of the CRISPRi vector containing the three sgRNAs involved a three-step cloning method, illustrated in Figure 2. The first step involved the cloning of the tobacco sgRNA expression vectors (pYPQ131c, pYPQ132c, and pYPQ133c (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA; Table 1) that contained the sgRNAs as inserts. Prior to transformation, sgRNA expression vectors were first digested with BglII and SalI followed by EPS3I to obtain linearized sgRNA expression vectors. Annealing of the previously designed forward and reverse sgRNA oligos (100 μM) was performed using the T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). Subsequently, the annealed sgRNAs were diluted with double-distilled water (ddH2O) at a ratio of 1:200. sgRNA expression vectors and sgRNAs (inserts) were ligated by T4 DNA ligase (NEB) at room temperature for 1 h to generate three expression vectors, gRep1-TN, gRep2-TN, and gRep3-TN; Table 2). Expression vectors were heat-shock transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α [31]. The plasmids from positive colonies were isolated and sequenced using the following primer-specific sequences: 5′-CAA GCC TGA TTG GGA GAA AA-3′ and 5′-GCC AGT GTG ATG GAT ATC TG-3′ to confirm the sgRNA sequence in their respective expression vectors.

2.4. Golden Gate Assembly of Multiple sgRNAs

The second cloning procedure used the Golden Gate Assembly Kit (NEB) to assemble all three sgRNAs into the sgRNA entry vector (Figure 2). The Golden Gate reaction was set up in a 10 μL reaction volume containing 100 ng of each gRNA expression vector (gRep1-TN, gRep2-TN, and gRep3-TN), 1 μL T4 DNA ligase buffer, 100 ng of Golden Gate recipient vector (pYPQ143; Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA; Table 1), 0.5 μL BsaI (NEB), and 0.5 μL T4 DNA ligase. The Golden Gate reaction was performed using the following cycling parameters: 10 cycles; 37 °C for 5 min, 16 °C for 10 min, 50 °C for 5 min, and 80 °C for 5 min to produce the sgRNA entry vector (pGGA3-TN; Table 1). After transforming into E. coli, the plasmids from positive colonies were isolated and sequenced using the following primer-specific sequences: 5′-CGG CCA GTC TTA AGC TC-3′ and 5′-TAT CAG CTG GAT GGC AAA T-3′ to confirm the presence of all three sgRNAs in the sgRNA entry vectors (pGGA3-TN).

2.5. CRISPRi Vector Construction

The final cloning step involved an LR recombination reaction where the validated sgRNA entry vector (pGGA3-TN) and the dCas9 entry vector (pYPQ153; Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) were cloned into the plant expression vector (pMDC32-Ubi1; Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA), generating the final CRISPRi vector (pCTN) (Figure 2, Table 1). The reaction was catalyzed by the LR Clonase enzyme mix (Invitrogen, Watertown, MA, USA). The plasmids from positive colonies were sequenced using the following primer-specific sequences: 5′-AGA CTA GTA AGG GCA AAT TC-3′ and 5′-GCG GAT AAC AAT TTC ACA CAG G-3′ and transformed into A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404.

2.6. Plant Transformation

A. tumefaciens harboring pCTN containing nptII and hpt genes was used to infect N. tabacum cell suspension cultures, according to Shumin et al. [32]. The 4-day-old N. tabacum cell suspension culture (5 mL) was mixed with the A. tumefaciens culture (100 μL) and co-cultivated at 28 °C in darkness for 3 days without shaking. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with 15 mL TLM supplemented with 300 mg/L cefotaxime (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) and 100 mg/L carbenicillin (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands). The N. tabacum cells were then resuspended and plated on selection agar TSM (TLM supplemented with 300 mg/L cefotaxime, 100 mg/L carbenicillin, 30 mg/L hygromycin B, 2% (w/v) Gelrite®). After 5–6 weeks of culture, the generated calli were transferred to TSM for propagation. A single colony of callus was selected to be propagated on liquid TSM to obtain a single cell line. The transformation efficiency was calculated and expressed as the number of positive regenerants per total number of independent transformation events.

2.7. PCR Amplification

Total genomic DNA from putatively transformed cells was isolated according to the modified procedures by Doyle and Doyle [33]. For PCR analysis, 100 ng total DNA was added to a 20 μL PCR containing 10 μL GoTaq® Master Mixes (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 0.1 μM of each primer pair: 5′-AGA CTA GTA AGG GCA AAT TC-3′ and 5′-GCG GAT AAC AAT TTC ACA CAG G-3′. PCR amplification was performed in a thermal cycler with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated on 1.0% agarose gel using electrophoresis and analyzed using a Gel-Pro imager and analyzer (Micro Lambda, Fremont, CA, USA). The product of the pCTN fragment (~405 bp) was confirmed by sequencing.

2.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated from N. tabacum cells based on a modified protocol described by Toni et al. [34]. cDNA was synthesized from 100 ng total RNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT master mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was carried out using SensiFast SYBR green master mix (Bioline, London, UK) and normalized to the endogenous EF1α and LF25 gene expression. The qPCR primer pairs were designed with PrimerQuest Tool (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA), targeting NtC4H (Accession No: MW260510), Nt4CL (Accession No: D43773), NtCHS (Accession No: KF927021), and NtCHI (Accession No: KJ730247) genes (Table 3). qPCR conditions were optimized for primer specificity, annealing temperature, and concentration. Each sample was tested in triplicate, and reaction mixtures were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR assays were performed using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR machine (ABI, Los Angeles, CA, USA) with the following cycling conditions: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 20 s, and run at 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 20 s for 40 cycles. The relative quantification of the gene expression level was calculated using ABI 7500 System Sequence Detection software v1.2 (ABI, Los Angeles, CA, USA).

2.9. Extraction of Metabolites

The transformed N. tabacum cells were freeze-dried for about 2 days. About 500 mg of cells were extracted using 5 mL methanol. The mixture was sonicated for 5 min at 37 kHz before incubating at 4 °C overnight. The extraction process was repeated twice. The methanol extracts were evaporated and partitioned with an equal volume of ethyl acetate (EA) and water. The EA fractions were evaporated to dryness, and the crude extracts were dissolved in methanol. All samples were filtered through a 0.45 mm PTFE filter before being analyzed by LC-MS.

2.10. LC-MS Analysis

The methanol extracts from putative transformed and untransformed cells were analyzed using the Agilent A6490 LC-MS system coupled with a triple quadrupole mass detector. The separation was carried out using a reversed-phase Eclipse plus C 18 column (1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) with corresponding solvent A [0.1% formic acid (FA; Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) in water] and solvent B [0.1% FA in acetonitrile (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA)]. The solvent gradient started at 95% of solvent A for 11 min and decreased to 40% for 2 min. At the 13th min, the solvent gradient was reduced to 5% A for 6 min before increasing to 95% on the 19th min. The reaction was run for 20 min at a flow rate of 0.2 mL per min. Mass spectra were acquired in multiple reactions monitoring with positive electrospray ionization mode. The concentration of analytes was determined by interpolating the relative peak areas for each analyte to the internal standard peak area in the sample on the spiked calibration curve. An internal standard, collidine, was used to compensate for losses during sample processing and instrumental analysis. The content of flavonoids in each sample was quantified in ng/mL.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data from qPCR and LC-MS analyses were presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Data analysis of the flavonoid-related gene expression and the differences in compound accumulation in wild-type and C4H-silenced cells were compared using paired t-tests. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Introducing the CRISPRi Silencing Vector into N. tabacum

The sgRNAs in the gRep1-TN, gRep2-TN, and gRep3-TN vectors were assembled into the sgRNA entry vector (pYPQ143), generating a gRNA entry vector (pGGA3-TN) (Supplementary Figure S1a). The positive clones were confirmed by sequencing (Supplementary Figure S1b). Both the pGGA3-TN and pYPQ153 vectors were subsequently cloned into pUMDC32-Ubi1, producing the final CRISPRi expression vector, pCTN. PCR amplification and sequencing confirmed the presence of a 405 bp fragment that contained the three sgRNAs in the pUMDC32-Ubi1 vector (Figure 3a; Supplementary Figure S2). Finally, the pCTN plant expression vector was transformed into an N. tabacum cell suspension culture, in which 16 out of 21 showed an expected amplicon size of 405 bp (Figure 3b).

3.2. Gene Expression of the C4H-Silenced Cells

The C4H transcript level for the transformed cell lines was significantly reduced by 0.44-fold compared to wild-type lines (Figure 4a). In addition, after silencing NtC4H, the downstream flavonoid-related gene expression of Nt4CL, NtCHS, and NtCHI was altered. In C4H-silenced cells, the expression level of Nt4CL and NtCHS was 2.62- and 1.64-fold, respectively, higher than in the wild-type cell line (Figure 4b,c). However, there was no statistically significant difference in NtCHI expression between the wild-type and the C4H-silenced cells (Figure 4d).

3.3. LC-MS Analysis of Flavonoids in the C4H-Silenced Cells

The accumulation of several flavonoids in wild-type and C4H-silenced cells was analyzed using LC-MS. As expected, the accumulation of cinnamic acid in the C4H-silenced cells was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in the wild-type (Figure 5a). However, there was no significant difference in the product of the C4H enzyme, i.e., p-coumaric acid, between wild-type and C4H-silenced cells (Figure 5b). The downstream flavonoid products, namely, pinostrobin, naringenin, chlorogenic acid, and kaempferol, have also been determined. We found that the C4H-silenced cells produced a significantly higher (p < 0.05) concentration of chlorogenic acid, pinostrobin, and naringenin compared to the wild-type, with a total amount of 1799.69 ng/mL, 384.19 ng/mL, and 597.53 ng/mL, respectively (Figure 5c–f). The kaempferol was an exception, where no significant difference between the wild-type and the C4H-silenced cells was observed.

4. Discussion

4.1. The CRISPRi System Is a Powerful Tool for Silencing C4H

Metabolic engineering approaches have been demonstrated as an effective way of increasing the production of flavonoids [35]. While the application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for manipulating the metabolite biosynthetic pathways in microorganism cells, such as bacteria and fungi, has become a widely used technique [36,37,38], the use of this technology for the same purpose in plants is scarce. In this study, we demonstrated how a CRISPRi silencing approach could be used to silence our target gene, i.e., NtC4H, and determine if the silenced gene could affect flavonoid production. To achieve this goal, we first constructed the CRISPRi vector and introduced it into N. tabacum cell suspension cultures. We used cell suspension cultures since they are easy for transformation and harvesting, and suitable for studying complex processes at the molecular and cellular levels in controlled conditions [39].
Our results show that the C4H-silenced cells had a lower expression of NtC4H than the wild-type, suggesting that the CRISPRi approach effectively reduces the NtC4H transcript. The low C4H expression in the transformed cell lines also indicates that the designed sgRNAs efficiently targeted the promoter of the NtC4H, and three sgRNAs could increase the gene silencing efficiency. Similar findings have also been reported by Lowder et al. [40], where the author found that their dCas9-based transcriptional system, together with three sgRNA cassettes, could increase the AtPAP1 transcript by 2- to 7-fold in the transgenic Arabidopsis. CRISPRi can be used to repress the transcription of endogenous genes in plants [27], and its effectiveness has been demonstrated in Arabidopsis, rice, and tobacco. For example, Lowder et al. [40] employed a PCO-dCas9-3X synthetic transcriptional repressor to suppress the AtCSTF64 gene in Arabidopsis. The authors showed that this dCas9 construct could decrease almost 60% of the AtCSTF64 transcript level. In the past, RNA interference (RNAi) that uses small RNA molecules to inhibit the translation of the target proteins was commonly used to manipulate plant metabolite biosynthesis. For instance, Sykes et al. [41] attempted to silence the expression of C4H in the hybrid eucalyptus (Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis) using RNAi. The authors found that the C4H-silenced cells showed a 0.22-fold lower C4H transcript level than the control. Similarly, Kumar et al. [42] reported that the antisense technique decreased the C4H expression in N. tabacum by a 0.23-fold reduction in the transgenic lines. However, despite its efficiency in regulating gene expression, RNAi is hindered by its inconsistency, incompleteness of knockdowns, and the potential for non-specificity in gene targeting [43]. In comparison, our findings show that the CRISPRi approach is more straightforward and efficient in knocking down NtC4H than conventional gene-knockdown strategies.

4.2. The Flavonoid-Related Genes Were Upregulated in the C4H-Silenced Cells

We found that the lower expression of the NtC4H increased Nt4CL, NtCHS, and NtCHI transcripts, although the enhancement was not significant for NtCHI. C4H is an important enzyme in converting cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid at the second step in the phenylpropanoid pathway. Silencing this gene increased the competing enzyme transcript of Nt4CL, located at another branch point in the phenylpropanoid pathway, next to NtC4H. The 4CL enzyme exists in different isoforms and is produced depending on the needs of the plants [44]. This enzyme is essential for flavonoid and monolignol biosynthesis in plants [45]. For example, Yang et al. [46] show that overexpressing 4CL in Rehmannia glutinosa significantly increased flavonoid production. Similarly, the correlation between enhanced 4CL expression and flavonoid biosynthesis has been reported in rice [47], cottonwood [48], barley [49], and soybean [50].
The CHS enzyme catalyzes p-coumaroyl-CoA (a product from 4CL) and three malonyl-coenzyme A (CoA) thioesters to form the specific chalcones [51]. Overexpressing this gene in soybean increased flavonoid production, such as liquiritigenin, isoliquiritigenin, and isoliquiritin [52]. However, the expression of NtCHI was not influenced by silencing NtC4H, probably due to the distance of CHI from the C4H in the pathway. CHI catalyzes the formation of flavanone through an intramolecular cyclization reaction, converting the bicyclic chalcone into tricyclic (2S)-flavanone [52]. It is noteworthy that our results should be interpreted with caution because most enzymes are transcriptionally regulated in a coordinated manner. Furthermore, the regulatory mechanisms controlling their expression are complex and have yet to be fully understood.

4.3. The Flavonoid Production Was Altered in the C4H-Silenced Cells

Enhancement of trans-cinnamic acid in the C4H-silenced cells may be correlated with the knockdown of NtC4H. This observation was in agreement with the previous study by Kumar et al. [53], where the authors showed that downregulating the C4H expression had increased the accumulation of cinnamic acid in Artemisia annua. In our case, the silencing of the competing enzyme, NtC4H, may have diverted most of the intermediates and boosted metabolic flux to the 4CL route. As shown in our metabolic analysis, the C4H-silenced cells produced a higher accumulation of pinostrobin (via the 4CL route) than naringenin (via the C4H route). This finding was supported by our qPCR analysis, where the expression of Nt4CL was upregulated. Similar findings were reported by Gifford et al. [54], where more pinocembrin was detected (via the 4CL route) after silencing the C4H in Datisca glomerata. However, despite reducing NtC4H expression, the accumulation of naringenin in the C4H-silenced cells was higher than in the wild-type. This might be due to the hydroxylation of CoA esters of cinnamoyl-CoA to coumaroyl-CoA by cinnamoyl-CoA 4-hydroxylase [55]. Furthermore, Liu et al. [56] reported that pinocembrin could be converted to naringenin through hydroxylation without altering pinocembrin-related gene expression.
Interestingly, chlorogenic acid increased (about 6-fold) when NtC4H expression was reduced, suggesting a possible metabolic flux diversion to the UDP-glucose:cinnamate glucosyltransferase (UGCT) pathway. UGCT catalyzes cinnamic acid to form cinnamoyl D-glucose and ultimately chlorogenic acid [57] (Figure 6). Chlorogenic acid is a major phenolic compound in plant metabolism as they are the precursor for lignin biosynthesis [58]. Besides, they are also actively involved in the plant’s defense mechanism against herbivores or pathogens [59] and protection against UV radiation [60]. Transcriptomic analysis by Xu et al. [61] revealed that 4CL and C4H are highly associated with enhanced chlorogenic acid accumulation in sweet potatoes, indicating the involvement of the early enzymes of phenylpropanoid metabolism in chlorogenic acid biosynthesis.

5. Conclusions

This study examined the effects of NtC4H silencing in N. tabacum cell suspension cultures using the CRISPRi system. The reduction of NtC4H expression in the transgenic cells has upregulated their Nt4CL and NtCHS expression, causing the accumulation of pinostrobin via an alternate route. Besides, the NtC4H silencing might also divert the metabolic flux to chlorogenic acid synthesis. Hence, further research should profile the metabolites due to NtC4H silencing and examine the metabolic flux diversion using stable isotope tracers, such as 13C- and 15N-labelled substrates. In conclusion, the CRISPRi system could be used to silence NtC4H, and suppressing this gene could alter the flavonoid-related gene expression and production in N. tabacum.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11081127/s1, Figure S1: Sequencing of sgRNA sequence in (a) gRNA expression vectors (gRep1-TN, gRep2-TN, and gRep3-TN) and (b) gRNA entry vectors (pGGA3-TN). Sequence highlighted indicates the sgRNA sequences; Figure S2: The 405 bp sequence from the sequencing of CRISPRi vector, pCTN. Sequence from dCas9 plasmid highlighted in orange; Sequences of gRNA highlighted in blue; Sequences from plant expression vector highlighted in green.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.C.T.; investigation, C.K.S.K.; formal analysis, C.K.S.K. and B.C.T.; writing—original draft, C.K.S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.N.M.N., N.K., and B.C.T.; supervision, S.N.M.N., N.K., and B.C.T.; funding acquisition, B.C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2018/STG03/UM/01/2 and FRGS/1/2018/STG03/UM/02/2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mutha, R.E.; Tatiya, A.U.; Surana, S.J. Flavonoids as natural phenolic compounds and their role in therapeutics: An overview. Futur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liew, Y.J.M.; Lee, Y.K.; Khalid, N.; Rahman, N.A.; Tan, B.C. Enhancing flavonoid production by promiscuous activity of prenyltransferase, BrPT2 from Boesenbergia Rotunda. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lou, H.; Hu, L.; Lu, H.; Wei, T.; Chen, Q. Metabolic engineering of microbial cell factories for biosynthesis of flavonoids: A review. Molecules 2021, 26, 4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yuan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Meng, M.; Wang, J.; Lin, J. Tissue-specific transcriptome for Dendrobium officinale reveals genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. Genomics 2020, 112, 1781–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tan, B.C.; Tan, S.K.; Wong, S.M.; Ata, N.; Rahman, N.A.; Khalid, N. Distribution of flavonoids and cyclohexenyl chalcone derivatives in conventional propagated and in vitro-derived field-grown Boesenbergia rotunda(L.) Mansf. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2015, 2015, 451870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dudek, B.; Warskulat, A.-C.; Schneider, B. The occurrence of flavonoids and related compounds in flower sections of Papaver nudicaule. Plants 2016, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dong, N.Q.; Lin, H.X. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant–environment interactions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mierziak, J.; Kostyn, K.; Kulma, A. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules 2014, 19, 16240–16265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, S.; Wu, F.; Li, Y.; Qian, Y.; Pan, X.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Fu, C.; Lin, H.; et al. NtMYB4 and NtCHS1 are critical factors in the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and are involved in salinity responsiveness. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shojaie, B.; Mostajeran, A.; Ghannadian, M. Flavonoid dynamic responses to different drought conditions: Amount, type, and localization of flavonols in roots and shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Turk. J. Biol. 2016, 40, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shah, A.; Smith, D.L. Flavonoids in agriculture: Chemistry and roles in, biotic and abiotic stress responses, and microbial associations. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Udomthanadech, K.; Vajrodaya, S.; Paisooksantivatana, Y. Antibacterial properties of the extracts from some Zingibereous species in Thailand against bacteria causing diarrhea and food poisoning in human. Int. Transact. J. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, N.; Kong, Y.; Zu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Meng, R.; Liu, X.; Efferth, T. Activity investigation of pinostrobin towards herpes simplex virus-1 as determined by atomic force microscopy. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chiang, M.; Kurmoo, Y.; Khoo, T.-J. Chemical and cell-based antioxidant capacity of methanolic extracts of three commonly edible plants from Zingiberaceae Family. Free Radic. 2016, 7, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Isa, N.M.; Abdelwahab, S.I.; Mohan, S.; Abdul, A.B.; Sukari, M.A.; Taha, M.M.E.; Syam, S.; Narrima, P.; Cheah, S.C.; Ahmad, S.; et al. In Vitro anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of boesenbergin A, a chalcone isolated from Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) (fingerroot). Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2012, 45, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Abdelwahab, S.I.; Mohan, S.; Abdulla, M.A.; Sukari, M.A.; Abdul, A.B.; Taha, M.M.; Syam, S.; Ahmad, S.; Lee, K.H. The methanolic extract of Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) Mansf. and its major compound pinostrobin induces anti-ulcerogenic property In Vivo: Possible involvement of indirect antioxidant action. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheah, S.-C.; Appleton, D.R.; Lee, S.-T.; Lam, M.-L.; Hadi, A.H.A.; Mustafa, M.R. Panduratin A inhibits the growth of A549 cells through induction of apoptosis and inhibition of NF-KappaB translocation. Molecules 2011, 16, 2583–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, D.U.; Chung, H.C.; Kim, C.; Hwang, J.K. Oral intake of Boesenbergia pandurata extract improves skin hydration, gloss, and wrinkling: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2017, 16, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vinayagam, R.; Xu, B. Antidiabetic properties of dietary flavonoids: A cellular mechanism review. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Amelia, F.; Iryani; Sari, P.Y.; Parikesit, A.A.; Bakri, R.; Toepak, E.P.; Tambunan, U.S.F. Assessment of drug binding potential of pockets in the NS2B/NS3 Dengue virus protein. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 349, 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M.; Tanabe, M. KEGG: Integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D545–D551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Shi, H.; Wu, J.; Cao, F. Alternative partial root-zone irrigation enhances leaf flavonoid accumulation and water use efficiency of Ginkgo biloba. New For. 2015, 47, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hernandez, I.; Alegre, L.; Munne-Bosch, S. Drought-induced changes in flavonoids and other low molecular weight antioxidants in Cistus clusii grown under Mediterranean field conditions. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24, 1303–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Farré, G.; Blancquaert, D.; Capell, T.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Christou, P.; Zhu, C. Engineering complex metabolic pathways in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 187–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, Y.-C.; Hou, J.-M.; Tian, S.-K.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Li, W.-D.; Liu, Y. Overexpressing chalcone synthase (CHS) gene enhanced flavonoids accumulation in Glycyrrhiza uralensis hairy roots. Bot. Lett. 2019, 167, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Y.; Wang, T.; Xin, Y.; Wang, G.; Xu, L.A. Overexpression of the GbF3’H1 gene enhanced the epigallocatechin, gallocatechin, and catechin contents in transgenic Populus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 998–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Karlson, C.K.S.; Mohd-Noor, S.N.; Nolte, N.; Tan, B.C. CRISPR/dCas9-based systems: Mechanisms and applications in plant sciences. Plants 2021, 10, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Murahige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shahmuradov, I.A.; Umarov, R.K.; Solovyev, V.V. TSSPlant: A new tool for prediction of plant Pol II promoters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, e65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Concordet, J.-P.; Haeussler, M. CRISPOR: Intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W242–W245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Green, M.R.; Sambrook, J. Cloning and transformation with plasmid vectors. In Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 157–260. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shumin, Z.; Yanxia, C.; Bang, Z.; Wei, Z. Optimization of BY2 cell suspension as a stable transformable system. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2014, 42, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  34. Toni, L.S.; Garcia, A.M.; Jeffrey, D.A.; Jiang, X.; Stauffer, B.L.; Miyamoto, S.D.; Sucharov, C.C. Optimization of phenol-chloroform RNA extraction. MethodsX 2018, 5, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rostami, Z.; Fazeli, A.; Hojati, Z. The isolation and expression analysis of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase and chalcone synthase genes of Scrophularia striata under different abiotic elicitors. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, C.; Lv, G.; Tu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Duan, Y.; Zeng, B.; He, B. Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in the synthesis of secondary metabolites in filamentous fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cho, S.; Shin, J.; Cho, B.-K. Applications of CRISPR/Cas system to bacterial metabolic engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, M.M.; Wong, F.T.; Wang, Y.; Luo, S.; Lim, Y.H.; Heng, E.; Yeo, W.L.; Cobb, R.E.; Enghiad, B.; Ang, E.L.; et al. CRISPR–Cas9 strategy for activation of silent Streptomyces biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moscatiello, R.; Baldan, B.; Navazio, L. Plant cell suspension cultures. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 953, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lowder, L.G.; Zhang, D.; Baltes, N.J.; Paul, J.W.; Tang, X.; Zheng, X.; Voytas, D.F.; Hsieh, T.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, Y. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 971–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sykes, R.W.; Gjersing, E.L.; Foutz, K.; Rottmann, W.H.; Kuhn, S.A.; Foster, C.E.; Ziebell, A.; Turner, G.B.; Decker, S.R.; Hinchee, M.A.W.; et al. Down-regulation of p-coumaroyl quinate/shikimate 3′-hydroxylase (C3′H) and cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) genes in the lignin biosynthetic pathway of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis leads to improved sugar release. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kumar, S.; Omer, S.; Chitransh, S.; Khan, B.M. Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase downregulation in transgenic tobacco alters transcript level of other phenylpropanoid pathway genes. Int. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Res. 2012, 3, 545–557. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mamta, B.; Rajam, M.V. RNAi technology: A new platform for crop pest control. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zha, J.; Wu, X.; Gong, G.; Koffas, M.A.G. Pathway enzyme engineering for flavonoid production in recombinant microbes. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2019, 9, e00104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Biala, W.; Jasinski, M. The phenylpropanoid case-It is transport that matters. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yang, Y.H.; Yang, M.R.; Chen, J.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Li, R.F. Two 4-coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase genes involved in acteoside and flavonoids biosynthesis in Rehmannia glutinosa. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 185, 115117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, H.; Li, Y.; Feng, S.; Zou, W.; Guo, K.; Fan, C.; Si, S.; Peng, L. Analysis of five rice 4-coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase enzyme activity and stress response for potential roles in lignin and flavonoid biosynthesis in rice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 430, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, C.; Zang, Y.; Liu, P.; Zheng, Z.; Ouyang, J. Characterization, functional analysis and application of 4-Coumarate: CoA ligase genes from Populus trichocarpa. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 302, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, M.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, P.; Han, Y.; Gu, Z.; Yang, R. NaCl treatment on physio-biochemical metabolism and phenolics accumulation in barley seedlings. Food Chem. 2020, 331, 127282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, X.; Fang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Yan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, P.; Zhang, S. Overexpression of a soybean 4-coumaric acid: Coenzyme A ligase (GmPI4L) enhances resistance to Phytophthora sojae in soybean. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 46, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nabavi, S.M.; Samec, D.; Tomczyk, M.; Milella, L.; Russo, D.; Habtemariam, S.; Suntar, I.; Rastrelli, L.; Daglia, M.; Xiao, J.; et al. Flavonoid biosynthetic pathways in plants: Versatile targets for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 38, 107316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yin, Y.C.; Zhang, X.D.; Gao, Z.Q.; Hu, T.; Liu, Y. The research progress of chalcone isomerase (CHI) in plants. Mol. Biotechnol. 2019, 61, 32–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kumar, R.; Vashisth, D.; Misra, A.; Akhtar, M.Q.; Jalil, S.U.; Shanker, K.; Gupta, M.M.; Rout, P.K.; Gupta, A.K.; Shasany, A.K. RNAi down-regulation of cinnamate-4-hydroxylase increases artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Gifford, I.; Battenberg, K.; Vaniya, A.; Wilson, A.; Tian, L.; Fiehn, O.; Berry, A.M. Distinctive patterns of flavonoid biosynthesis in roots and nodules of Datisca glomerata and Medicago spp. revealed by metabolomic and gene expression profiles. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rastogi, S.; Kumar, R.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Shanker, K.; Gupta, M.M.; Nagegowda, D.A.; Shasany, A.K. 4-coumarate: CoA ligase partitions metabolites for eugenol biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 1238–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Liu, Y.; Wu, L.; Deng, Z.; Yu, Y. Two putative parallel pathways for naringenin biosynthesis in Epimedium wushanense. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 13919–13927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Payyavula, R.S.; Shakya, R.; Sengoda, V.G.; Munyaneza, J.E.; Swamy, P.; Navarre, D.A. Synthesis and regulation of chlorogenic acid in potato: Rerouting phenylpropanoid flux inHQT-silenced lines. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Volpi, E.S.N.; Mazzafera, P.; Cesarino, I. Should I stay or should I go: Are chlorogenic acids mobilized towards lignin biosynthesis? Phytochemistry 2019, 166, 112063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kundu, A.; Vadassery, J. Chlorogenic acid-mediated chemical defence of plants against insect herbivores. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Petrulova, V.; Ducaiova, Z.; Repcak, M. Short-term UV-B dose stimulates production of protective metabolites in Matricaria chamomilla leaves. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 90, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, J.; Zhu, J.; Lin, Y.; Zhu, H.; Tang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, X. Comparative transcriptome and weighted correlation network analyses reveal candidate genes involved in chlorogenic acid biosynthesis in sweet potato. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway in plants.
Figure 1. Phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway in plants.
Biology 11 01127 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of the three-step cloning procedure for CRISPRi vector, pCTN, construction using Golden Gate assembly and Gateway LR reaction. Step 1 shows the cloning of individual gRNAs into a series of gRNA expression vectors (pYPQ131c, pYPQ132c, and pYPQ133c) that contain their own promoter. Step 2 involves the assembly of multiple gRNA expression vectors into one Golden Gate recipient vector, pYPQ143 (for three gRNA expression cassettes). Step 3 involves the final assembly of dCas9 vector and gRNA cassette into a single T-DNA binary vector (pMDC32-Ubi1) through Gateway recombination. LB, left border; RB, right border; spec, spectinomycin resistance marker; tet, tetracycline resistance marker; kan, kanamycin resistance marker; GOI, gene of insert.
Figure 2. Illustration of the three-step cloning procedure for CRISPRi vector, pCTN, construction using Golden Gate assembly and Gateway LR reaction. Step 1 shows the cloning of individual gRNAs into a series of gRNA expression vectors (pYPQ131c, pYPQ132c, and pYPQ133c) that contain their own promoter. Step 2 involves the assembly of multiple gRNA expression vectors into one Golden Gate recipient vector, pYPQ143 (for three gRNA expression cassettes). Step 3 involves the final assembly of dCas9 vector and gRNA cassette into a single T-DNA binary vector (pMDC32-Ubi1) through Gateway recombination. LB, left border; RB, right border; spec, spectinomycin resistance marker; tet, tetracycline resistance marker; kan, kanamycin resistance marker; GOI, gene of insert.
Biology 11 01127 g002
Figure 3. Representative gel electrophoresis image of PCR verification on the short fragment between gRNA entry vector (pGGA3) and the plant expression vector (pUMDC32-Ubi1) in (a) CRISPRi vector, pCTN, and (b) Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harbouring pCTN. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder H3 RTU (GeneDireX, Taiwan, China); Lane -, PCR negative control using double-distilled water as DNA template; Lane +, PCR positive control using plasmid pCTN; Lanes C1–C4, Escherichia coli transformed with pCTN; Lanes B1 and B2, A. tumafaciens transformed with plasmid pCTN.
Figure 3. Representative gel electrophoresis image of PCR verification on the short fragment between gRNA entry vector (pGGA3) and the plant expression vector (pUMDC32-Ubi1) in (a) CRISPRi vector, pCTN, and (b) Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harbouring pCTN. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder H3 RTU (GeneDireX, Taiwan, China); Lane -, PCR negative control using double-distilled water as DNA template; Lane +, PCR positive control using plasmid pCTN; Lanes C1–C4, Escherichia coli transformed with pCTN; Lanes B1 and B2, A. tumafaciens transformed with plasmid pCTN.
Biology 11 01127 g003
Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of flavonoid-related key enzymes in wild type (WT) and transgenic CRISPRi cell lines of Nicotiana tabacum. (a) Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase, (b) 4-coumarate ligase, (c) chalcone synthase, and (d) chalcone isomerase. Data represent the means of three biological replicates (n = 3). Error bars are standard deviation (±SD). Asterisk (*) represents significant differences at p < 0.05 according to paired t-test.
Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of flavonoid-related key enzymes in wild type (WT) and transgenic CRISPRi cell lines of Nicotiana tabacum. (a) Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase, (b) 4-coumarate ligase, (c) chalcone synthase, and (d) chalcone isomerase. Data represent the means of three biological replicates (n = 3). Error bars are standard deviation (±SD). Asterisk (*) represents significant differences at p < 0.05 according to paired t-test.
Biology 11 01127 g004
Figure 5. Concentration of selected compounds in wild type (WT) and transgenic CRISPRi cell lines of Nicotiana tabacum cell suspension cultures. (a) Cinnamic acid, (b) p-coumaric acid, (c) chlorogenic acid, (d) naringenin, (e) pinostrobin, and (f) kaempferol. Data represent the means of three biological replicates (n = 3). Error bars are standard deviation (±SD). Asterisk (*) represents significant differences at p < 0.05 according to paired t-test.
Figure 5. Concentration of selected compounds in wild type (WT) and transgenic CRISPRi cell lines of Nicotiana tabacum cell suspension cultures. (a) Cinnamic acid, (b) p-coumaric acid, (c) chlorogenic acid, (d) naringenin, (e) pinostrobin, and (f) kaempferol. Data represent the means of three biological replicates (n = 3). Error bars are standard deviation (±SD). Asterisk (*) represents significant differences at p < 0.05 according to paired t-test.
Biology 11 01127 g005
Figure 6. The proposed biosynthesis pathway of flavonoid in the C4H-silenced cells of Nicotiana tabacum. The dotted arrows show the potential diversion of metabolic flux. Alphabet in red indicates reduced expression, whereas alphabet in green indicates enhanced gene expression. PAL, phenylalanine ligase; C4H, cinnamate-4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; UGCT, UDP-glucose:cinnamate glucosyltransferase; HCGQT, hydroxycinnamoyl glucose:quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase; CC4H, cinnamoyl-CoA 4-hydroxylase. The enzymes for 4-hydroxylation of cinnamoyl-CoA have not been demonstrated yet. Hence, CC4H is indicated in brackets showing their potential role.
Figure 6. The proposed biosynthesis pathway of flavonoid in the C4H-silenced cells of Nicotiana tabacum. The dotted arrows show the potential diversion of metabolic flux. Alphabet in red indicates reduced expression, whereas alphabet in green indicates enhanced gene expression. PAL, phenylalanine ligase; C4H, cinnamate-4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; UGCT, UDP-glucose:cinnamate glucosyltransferase; HCGQT, hydroxycinnamoyl glucose:quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase; CC4H, cinnamoyl-CoA 4-hydroxylase. The enzymes for 4-hydroxylation of cinnamoyl-CoA have not been demonstrated yet. Hence, CC4H is indicated in brackets showing their potential role.
Biology 11 01127 g006
Table 1. List of plasmids for Escherichia coli transformation.
Table 1. List of plasmids for Escherichia coli transformation.
PlasmidBackboneBacterial Antibiotic ResistanceConcentration of
Antibiotics (mg/L)
Remarks
gRep1-TNpYPQ131cTetracycline51st gRNA expression vector for tobacco
gRep2-TNpYPQ132cTetracycline52nd gRNA expression vector for tobacco
gRep3-TNpYPQ133cTetracycline53rd gRNA expression vector for tobacco
pGGA3-TNpYPQ143Spectinomycin100gRNA entry vector for tobacco
pdCas9pYPQ153Spectinomycin100dCas9 entry vector
pCRi-0pMDC32-Ubi1Kanamycin50Plant destination vector/
CRISPRi empty vector
pCTNpMDC32-Ubi1Kanamycin50CRISPRi vector
Table 2. gRNA sequences cloned into their respective expression vector.
Table 2. gRNA sequences cloned into their respective expression vector.
gRNAgRNA Sequence (5′-3′)Expression VectorPlasmid
G1F-TNGTG TGC GTT AAT ATT AAC GGA GAG TTG GpYPQ131cgRep1-TN
G1R-TNAAA CCC AAC TCT CCG TTA ATA TTA ACG C
G2F-TNGTG TGC CTC ACA CTT TCT TAT CTT ATG GpYPQ132cgRep2-TN
G2R-TNAAA CCC ATA AGA TAA GAA AGT GTG AGG C
G3F-TNGTG TGG AGA AAA GAA ACT TGG GAG TTG GpYPQ133cgRep3-TN
G3R-TNAAA CCC AAC TCC CAA GTT TCT TTT CTC C
Table 3. qPCR primer pairs for flavonoid-related genes.
Table 3. qPCR primer pairs for flavonoid-related genes.
GenePrimer NamePrimer Sequence (5′-3′)
EF1αK-EF1aF
K-Efa1R
CCCTTGGTGTCAAGCAAATG
GGTAGGAAGAAACCTCCTTCAC
LF25K-L25F
K-L25R
AAAGCTGATCCGTCCAAAAA
GACAGCCTTGGCAACCTTAG
C4HK-C4H F
K-C4H R
GGAAGAAGCCCGAAGAGTTTAG
CTCCTCCTACCAACACCAAATG
4CL4CL-F
4CL-R
GGTTACACACTGGCGACATTGG
GGAACTTCTCCTGCTTGCTCATC
CHSK-CHS_TN F
K-CHS_TN R
CCTTTGTTCGAGCTTGTCTCTG
GCCCAGGAACATCTTTGAGTAAG
CHIK-CHI_TN F
K-CHI_TN R
ATCCAGTGATTGAGGAGAAACC
TCAGGCTCAGTTGACAAAGG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karlson, C.K.S.; Mohd Noor, S.N.; Khalid, N.; Tan, B.C. CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Biology 2022, 11, 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081127

AMA Style

Karlson CKS, Mohd Noor SN, Khalid N, Tan BC. CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Biology. 2022; 11(8):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karlson, Chou Khai Soong, Siti Nurfadhlina Mohd Noor, Norzulaani Khalid, and Boon Chin Tan. 2022. "CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum" Biology 11, no. 8: 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081127

APA Style

Karlson, C. K. S., Mohd Noor, S. N., Khalid, N., & Tan, B. C. (2022). CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Biology, 11(8), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop