Next Article in Journal
The Role of TLR2 in Infectious Diseases Caused by Mycobacteria: From Cell Biology to Therapeutic Target
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation of Bacillus sp. A5.3 Strain with Keratinolytic Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/biology11020245
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of the External Morphology of the Sternal Glands for Hornets in the Genus Vespa

by
Heather R. Mattila
1,*,
Gard W. Otis
2,
Johan Billen
3,
Lien T. P. Nguyen
4 and
Satoshi Shimano
5
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02841, USA
2
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Zoological Institute, University of Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, Box 2466, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
4
Insect Ecology Department, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam
5
Science Research Center, Hosei University, Fujimi, Tokyo 102-8160, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(2), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020245
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 27 January 2022 / Accepted: 28 January 2022 / Published: 5 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Behavioural Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Hornets are a group of 22 species of highly social wasps in the genus Vespa. These conspicuous insects construct large nests that are maintained by one or more queens and their offspring. Unlike other insects, many species of social wasps have glands on the underside of their abdomen called the van der Vecht and Richards glands. Documented uses for these glands by workers of some hornet species include producing pheromones for nestmate recruitment during group attacks on prey and chemical defense of nests against ants. We confirmed that these glands were present in nine hornet species. To examine differences among species in gland morphology, we used scanning electron microscopy to image the external surface of worker bodies around the glands. Accounting for differences in body size, we found that giant hornets and their close relatives had comparatively larger glands than the other species, some of which had glands that were approximately half as large. Differences among species are best explained by how hornets hunt and not by the likelihood that their nesting habitat increases exposure to ant predation. However, more information about how hornet workers use their sternal glands is necessary to permit further interpretation of their comparative gland morphology.

Abstract

Many social wasps in the speciose subfamilies Polistinae and Vespinae have two sternal glands—the van der Vecht gland and the Richards gland—that are not found in other insects. The presence of these glands has been confirmed in only 6 of 22 hornet species (genus Vespa) and images of their fine structure have not been produced. Here; we characterize the external morphology associated with both glands for workers of nine Vespa species using scanning electron microscopy. All hornets had similar gland configurations; although gland-associated external features differed among species. Scaled for size, glands were equivalently sized for the giant hornets (V. mandarinia and V. soror) and their closest phylogenetic relatives (V. tropica and V. ducalis). Relative size of gland-associated structures was reduced by half for V. simillima; V. velutina; and V. affinis workers. The remaining species (V. crabro and V. analis) had intermediately sized features. Differences among species in external gland structure were best explained by selective pressures related to predatory behavior, rather than defense of nests against ants. However, a lack of information about how Vespa workers use their van der Vecht and Richards glands limits a comparative interpretation of the function of their external gland morphology.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Vespa Linnaeus, 1758 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Vespinae) is a biologically diverse genus of 22 species of hornets that share many morphological, behavioral, and ecological traits (Figure 1) [1,2,3,4]. These conspicuous insects are mostly restricted to Asia, although two species have natural distributions that extend to parts of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East [5]. All hornets form eusocial colonies with morphologically differentiated castes of reproductives and workers [1,6]. In general, overwintered foundresses of both temperate and tropical species establish nests in the spring or early summer and rear their first generation of workers. Thereafter, workers assume most duties related to nest construction, foraging, and brood care, including rearing new reproductives toward the end of the annual cycle [1,2,6]. The nests, initiated by queens either above or below ground depending on the species, are expanded by the workers. Hornets forage from plants and fungi [1] and can even be important pollinators [7,8], but they are better known as voracious predators of arthropod prey that adults feed to their larvae [1,6,9]. Most hornets hunt solitarily, although giant hornets are well known for hunting in groups [1,2,6,9,10,11,12,13].
The collective behaviors of hornets and other social wasps, most of which are in the subfamilies Vespinae (to which Vespa belongs) and Polistinae [15,16], are supported in part by exocrine glands and their secretions (reviewed by [17]). Of particular interest are the social functions and morphological features of two sternal glands that, unlike other exocrine glands, are found in some species of vespids only (reviewed by [17,18]). They are the van der Vecht gland, located on the sixth metasomal (=terminal) sternite, and the Richards gland, located on the fifth metasomal (=penultimate) sternite. When present, these glands tend to be well developed and clearly discernible, and are often associated with external cuticular modifications that are presumably related to how gland products are used [17,18]. Following the standard classification by Noirot and Quennedey [19], there are two categories of insect glands: class 1 glands are formed by a single layer of epithelial cells and class 3 glands are formed by bicellular units, each unit comprised of a secretory cell and a duct cell (an initial classification also included class 2, which was later recognized as homologous to oenocytes [20,21]). Both the van der Vecht and Richards glands are class 3 glands [18,19], the ducts of which open to external pores at the anterior margin of each sternite. Pores of the van der Vecht gland occur in two lateral clusters, while external configuration of the Richards gland is more variable across vespids [22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
These two sternal glands have been examined extensively among the polistines, primarily because both gland occurrence and social behaviors vary broadly within this speciose subfamily (reviewed by [17,18]). Gland presence, morphology, and function have been reported to a lesser extent within the vespines (reviewed by [17,26,28]). Across species examined to date in both subfamilies, females have a van der Vecht gland if they found nests independently, but the gland is absent in most species that found nests as swarms [17,18,22,23,25,28,29,30,31,32]. An important function of gland secretions is to protect unguarded nests from ant predation. Gland products repel ants and foundresses rub their glands on nest petioles in the species that have been studied [31,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Additionally, secretions from the van der Vecht gland have been found to play a role in queen dominance in Polistes [44,45] and nestmate recruitment in the giant hornets V. mandarinia and V. soror [11,32]. It has been more difficult to identify a general function that correlates well with gland presence for the Richards gland [26]. Depending on the species, its secretions are involved in swarm guidance [25,46,47], ant repellency [31,41], and attraction between reproductives [48]. Like the van der Vecht gland, the Richards gland occurs widely across the polistines and vespines, but is absent or poorly defined in many species [17,18,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,49,50,51].
This study presents a comparison of the external morphology associated with the sternal glands of 9 of the 22 hornet species in the genus Vespa. At present, the structure and function of hornets’ glands have not been extensively explored, even though they likely facilitate their ecological success as social insects and their impact as pests to humans and predators of economically important pollinators [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Published information about sternal gland structure has been limited to drawings of the van der Vecht and Richards glands for V. crabro, V. tropica, and V. affinis [29,31], and of the van der Vecht gland only for V. analis [30]. Recently, we completed a microscopic analysis of the internal and external fine structure of both glands for the giant hornet V. soror [32]. In the present study, we extend that work to an examination via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the external features associated with the van der Vecht and Richards glands of V. affinis, V. analis, V. crabro, V. ducalis, V. mandarinia, V. simillima, V. tropica, and V. velutina. These hornets share genus-related commonalities, but are also characterized by species-specific traits that can be tied to sternal gland function. For instance, the giant hornets V. soror and V. mandarinia recruit nestmates to prey colonies using secretions of the van der Vecht and possibly other gastral exocrine glands [11,32]. Other species-specific behaviors may also benefit from social communication facilitated by sternal glands. For instance, these species differ in their distributions and nesting habits [1,2], and thus their risk of exposure to ant predation [9,60,61]. Additionally, many V. simillima, V. crabro, and V. velutina colonies undergo nest relocation during their annual cycles [1,2,6,9,62,63,64,65,66,67], for which orientation mechanisms are unknown.
Our goal is to characterize the external fine structure of the van der Vecht and Richards glands for workers of nine species within the genus Vespa (Figure 1), and then consider similarities and differences in gland-associated morphology in the context of the hornets’ natural histories. Notably, seven of these species have been detected or become established after accidental introduction to continents outside of their natural ranges [5,68,69], highlighting the need for greater understanding of basic aspects of their social biology. Our study shows that hornet workers of all the species we examined have well-developed sternal glands, but that species vary in the expression of gland-associated features. We provide a detailed exploration of the external sternal gland structure within the genus Vespa, and consider the selective pressures that have shaped these exocrine glands as they support group living within this important clade of predatory social wasps.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Worker Specimens

Specimens of Vespa workers were acquired from several sources for imaging via SEM; Table 1 summarizes their collection information. None of the hornets we imaged are considered endangered in the countries in which the specimens originated, so special collection permits were not required for this study. We studied a total of nine species, with 1–5 specimens per species. Generally, variation within species in gland presence has not been observed previously [25,26,28]; our recent examination of the sternal glands of 25 V. soror specimens supports this expectation [32].

2.2. SEM Imaging

The fifth and sixth metasomal sternites were carefully removed from the gasters of specimens of each species. Pinned specimens were either relaxed in a humidifier or soaked in 80% ethanol prior to dissection. Specimens were dissected, dried if needed, and sputter coated prior to imaging with a scanning electron microscope. V. affinis, V. analis, V. mandarinia, V. simillima, V. soror (specimens collected in 2020), and V. velutina were imaged via a JEOL–JCM-6000PLUS microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). V. crabro workers from Belgium were imaged with a JEOL-JSM-6360 microscope. Images of the remaining specimens were taken with an FEI Quanta FEG 250 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). In all cases, external structures of sternites were imaged across a range of magnifications to allow the size of gland-associated structures to be estimated (see next section).

2.3. Image Analysis

Features of the fifth and sixth metasomal sternites for the nine Vespa species were quantified using ImageJ image analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). To get accurate estimates of the size of sternal features, our general approach was to measure each feature in multiple images per specimen across a range of angles and magnifications. Within a single image, length and area measurements were calibrated using the image’s embedded scale (ImageJ: set scale and measure functions). Each area estimate for an image was an average based on triplicate measures taken from that image. All size estimates for a single feature made across multiple images of a specimen were averaged and, if we had more than one specimen per species, average values per specimen were averaged across specimens within a species. Using this approach, one to eight images were used to estimate the size of each sternal feature per species. For some of the larger hornets, composite sternal images were created using multiple images from the same specimen.
We quantified several sternite features, as indicated in Figure S1. The area of cuticle covered with pore openings, from which glandular secretions are emitted, was estimated for each sternite (Richards gland: single anterior band of pores; van der Vecht gland: both lateral pore clusters combined). We also determined the area on the sixth sternite of the hyaline region, which contains the sternal brush between paired pore clusters (demarcated posteriorly by a depression in the cuticle). For both sternites, we calculated the percentage of the sternite’s area (from its anterior margin to the posterior margin of the smooth cuticle; see Figure S1) that was covered by pores. We made the same comparison for the area of the hyaline region relative to the area of the sixth sternite. Mean pore diameter for each gland was estimated from multiple high-magnification images per species (ImageJ: straight line tool; measured range 68–110 pores per gland per species, pooled across specimens as images permitted).
We also estimated the number of external pores per gland per species, which reflects the number of internal bicellular glandular units per gland [18,19,20]. We confirmed this gland classification in V. soror [32] and assumed that glandular cells were similarly structured throughout Vespa, as other authors have reported for polistine species (e.g., [25]). For the van der Vecht gland, we estimated total number of pore openings per specimen by counting pores in images that fully captured each gland cluster (ImageJ: multi-point tool and grid function). There was minimal overlap between the pore clusters and sternal brush, and pores among setae were counted when visible. In some cases, pores adjacent to the sternal brush could not be counted because the cluster was partially obscured (e.g., by a folded intersegmental membrane or debris). However, we had clear views of at least one cluster per specimen, so in these cases we counted pores in the unobstructed cluster and then doubled that count to estimate total number of pore openings per specimen. For the Richards gland, we calculated the total number of pore openings per specimen by multiplying gland area by average pore density (pores/μm2); the latter was estimated from a range of two to nine high-magnification images taken across each specimen’s band of pores.
Finally, for the sixth sternite, we assessed the length of the setae of the sternal brush for each specimen relative to sternite size by dividing the hyaline region into quarters from side to side, then measuring the maximum length from the anterior margin of the sternite to the tip of the longest setae in each quadrant (ImageJ: straight line tool; see Figure S1). These values were averaged and compared to the length of the sternite at the midline for each specimen (to the posterior margin of the smooth cuticle). These calculations were performed for multiple images per specimen as available, and then averaged for each species across available specimens.

2.4. Statistics

We had only one specimen for some species, so statistical analyses were limited to avoid pseudoreplication. The only exception was for pore diameter, which was treated as an experimental unit by sampling pores across different images within a species, as image availability and specimen condition permitted. Pore diameter was compared among species using one-way ANOVAs for each gland; data were log transformed to improve normality and means were separated using Tukey HSD tests. Trait values were correlated using Spearman rank-order correlations. Significance for all tests was set at α = 0.05. Tests were conducted using SAS (version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

All Vespa specimens that we examined had obvious van der Vecht and Richards glands, although there were differences among species in the details of their external features. Below, we highlight these patterns.

3.1. Structure of the van der Vecht Gland among Vespa Species

All workers had paired clusters of van der Vecht gland pores on either side of a medial sternal brush (Figure 2). However, the size of the aforementioned gland features varied greatly across species (Table 2). There was a five-fold difference between species with the smallest and largest glands based on number of pore openings per specimen (range 1200–5900 pores per gland across species; Table 2), which directly reflected number of glandular units internally. Pore number was strongly and positively associated with differences in sternite size among the nine focal species, with gland size increasing with hornet size (Figure 3a; Spearman correlation: r = 0.83, p = 0.005). In specimens of all species, pore openings at the inner margins of the pore clusters overlapped slightly with short setae at the lateral edges of the sternal brush, but were absent among longer, more central setae (Figure 4).
One of the most obvious differences among species was the extent of development of the sternal brush (Figure 2). In absolute terms, the giant hornets (V. soror and V. mandarinia) had the largest sternal brushes, with long setae that extended beyond the boundaries of the large hyaline regions from which they originated. However, giant hornets also had the largest sternites (Table 2). When scaled to account for sternite size, six species had a similar proportion (~40%) of the anterior part of their sternite occupied by gland-associated structures (i.e., pores and the hyaline region; Figure 2a–e,i and Figure 5a). Almost all of these species (i.e., V. soror, V. mandarinia, V. tropica, V. ducalis, V. crabro) also had long setae that extended beyond the cuticular depression that marked the posterior margin of the hyaline region (Figure 2a–e, Table 2). The exception was V. analis (Figure 2i, Table 2). In contrast, three species—V. affinis, V. simillima, and V. velutina—had modest external structures associated with their van der Vecht glands that covered less than 20% of the anterior part of their sternites (Figure 2f–h and Figure 5a; Table 2). For these species, the sternal brush was relatively small, with shorter and sparser setae compared to the more elaborate sternal brushes of the other species. All species had a depression that held the sternal brush, which likely creates a reservoir for gland secretions, as both internal and external ultrastructure has suggested for V. soror [32], although storage capacity would be relatively reduced by the small size of the hyaline region in these latter three species (Figure 2f–h).
At a fine scale, there was variability both across species and within specimens of the same species in the texture of the cuticle around pore openings of the van der Vecht gland; Figure 4 and Figure 6 highlight some of these differences. The cuticular surface of V. tropica and V. ducalis had scale-like projections surrounding anterior pore openings, especially approaching the midline (e.g., Figure 6c,d). Less sculptured, wave-like topography was observed for V. affinis, V. simillima, V. velutina, and V. analis, with some pores opening into shallow depressions (Figure 6f–i). The majority of species had some or most pores surrounded by smooth cuticle (e.g., Figure 6a,b), with the exception of V. crabro, for which most pores opened into the bases of sharply articulated pits (Figure 4e and Figure 6e). The diameter of pore openings differed among species (Table 2; one-way ANOVA: F8,1012 = 226.8, p < 0.0001) and correlated strongly with gland area (Figure 3b; Spearman correlation: r = 0.88, p = 0.002), dividing broadly into species with large pore openings (the giant hornets V. soror and V. mandarinia and their close relatives V. tropica and V. ducalis, i.e., the tropica taxonomic group [3,4,14]) and species with relatively smaller pore openings (V. crabro, V. affinis, V. simillima, V. velutina, and V. analis).

3.2. Structure of the Richards Gland among Vespa Species

The general configuration of the Richards gland was similar among Vespa species; all workers had a well-defined region of pores that opened to the cuticle in a continuous band along the anterior margin of the fifth metasomal sternite (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Other than pore openings, this region was relatively featureless, with few cuticular modifications among the specimens that were examined (Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9). All workers had pore openings that were on the same plane as the surrounding cuticle (Figure 9c,d,f), and these pores tended to be located at the anterior edge of the band. However, depending on the species, this transitioned toward the posterior edge of the band to either individual openings that sat at the base of a cuticular depression (Figure 9e,g,h) or pores that clustered in shared depressions (Figure 9a,b,i) that may serve as mini-reservoirs into which secretions accumulate. Figure 9 highlights differences among species in the nature of these depressions, where they occurred. All workers had short, bristly setae that were thinly distributed at the anterior margin of the band of pores (e.g., Figure 8a and Figure 9c,f,i).
The biggest difference among species was the size of their Richards glands, which was reflected in a range from only 1600 pores for V. affinis to 15,000 to 21,000 pores for the giant hornets V. soror and V. mandarinia, respectively (Table 3). Differences in pore number resulted from some key differences among species. Firstly, pore number increased strongly with sternite size (Table 3; Figure 3c; Spearman correlation: r = 0.95, p < 0.0001), so larger species tended to have larger Richards glands. Secondly, although the proportion of the fifth sternite that the Richards gland occupied was not starkly different among species, the giant hornets and their close relatives (V. tropica and V. ducalis) had >15% of their fifth sternites covered with pores, whereas the remaining species had ~10% coverage of their sternites by pores (Figure 5b). Moreover, some species had more sparsely distributed pores within gland boundaries. For instance, there were noticeable differences in pore density for V. affinis and V. velutina (Figure 8f,h) compared to the giant hornets, as well as V. tropica, and V. ducalis (Figure 8a–d). Lastly, we found that pore size increased across species as gland area increased (Figure 3d; Spearman correlation: r = 0.88, p = 0.002). Pore diameter was largest in the giant hornets and their close relatives (Figure 3d; Table 3; one-way ANOVA: F8,1043 = 392.4, p < 0.0001).

4. Discussion

All workers of the nine Vespa species that we examined in this study showed prominent external evidence of sternal glands on their fifth and sixth metasomal (=penultimate and terminal) sternites. While information about how Vespa workers use these glands is limited (as discussed below), their substantial size suggests that their function is important. The basic features of these glands were similar across species and in line with configurations reported for both glands in surveys of other vespids [17,18,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Externally, the van der Vecht gland in all Vespa species consisted of paired clusters of pore openings on either side of a medial sternal brush at the anterior of the sixth metasomal sternite. The Richards gland always presented as an uninterrupted band of pore openings along the anterior margin of the fifth metasomal sternite. We did not have live specimens or specimens that were preserved in a way that permitted an examination of the internal cell structure of either gland (in contrast to our detailed study of V. soror [32]). However, external pores are indirect evidence of class 3 gland structure, with each pore leading to a duct cell that provides passage for the products of the single secretory cell with which it interfaces [19,25,70]. Our recent histological examination of V. soror workers confirmed the association between external pores and these bicellular glandular units [32]. It is possible that class 1 glandular cells were also present—they have been noted in other vespids [23,25,27]—but these would not be detectable from external SEM images only. Our work supports statements about the ubiquity of the van der Vecht gland throughout the Vespinae [2,31] and expectations that the same is true for the Richards gland within Vespa based on previous examination of two species (V. crabro and V. orientalis [22,26]. In fact, until recently, details about the presence of one or both glands had been available for five Vespa species only, with drawings of the position of external features published for four of those species [22,29,30,31]. Our work extends our understanding of the external morphology of these glands for almost half of the members of the genus (this study, [32]).
There were notable trends in the external features of both sternal glands across species. In general, larger hornets had larger glands, represented by more pore openings, as well as larger gland-related features, such as wider pore diameter and increased size of the hyaline region and sternal brush. Size matters, as it has widely been assumed that larger gland features are indicative of increased functionality when gland morphology is compared across castes or species [23,71,72,73,74,75]. However, body parts may or may not scale proportionally across species when workers differ in size. For instance, the giant hornets V. mandarinia and V. soror had the largest gland features relative to most other Vespa species, but these two species are also the largest hornets. When scaled to sternite size, ~40% of the anterior sternite of many species, including the giant hornets, was covered by the elaborate external features of the van der Vecht gland. However, three species (V. affinis, V. simillima, and V. velutina) had markedly smaller gland features that covered only half that area (i.e., ~20% of the anterior sternite). Differences among species were not as stark for the Richards gland: a modest increase in relative gland coverage was limited to only the giant hornets and their phylogenetically close relatives, V. tropica and V. ducalis. This same clade of hornets, plus V. crabro, also had similarly elaborated sternal brushes associated with the van der Vecht gland, with dense setae that extended beyond the posterior margin of the hyaline region. In contrast, the relatively poorly developed gland-associated features of V. affinis, V. simillima, and V. velutina were matched by comparatively less numerous, smaller, and thinly distributed pores of the Richards gland. V. crabro and V. analis were generally intermediate, with a mix of both relatively prominent and reduced features.
These broad trends align in many ways with our current understanding of the phylogeny for Vespa (Figure 1) [4]. The ‘tropica group’ (giant hornets and their closest relatives) is a consistently resolved clade based on both molecular data and morphological (non-glandular) traits of both males and females (Figure 1, [3,4,14]). When gland traits were compared across species in our study, workers from this lineage—V. soror, V. mandarinia, V. tropica, and V. ducalis—regularly grouped together based on their relatively large sternal glands (e.g., pore number, area, and diameter; size of hyaline region and sternal brush). At the other end of the spectrum, the relatively undersized sternal gland features that united V. velutina and V. simillima mirror their repeatedly resolved, close phylogenetic relationship (Figure 1) [3,4,14,64]. The remaining species in our study—V. crabro, V. affinis, and V. analis—shifted in their alignment with these two previously mentioned groups of hornets depending on which gland features were considered. For example, V. analis had a large hyaline area, but short setae in its sternal brush and a small number of pores for its van der Vecht gland, uniting it generally but not uniformly with the other species with relatively small van der Vecht glands. However, the features of V. analis’s Richards gland approached the relatively large size of the specimens in the tropica group. Interestingly, this lack of clear fit echoes the varying position of V. analis in the Vespa phylogeny as the genus has been revised over time, as well as its current placement in a monotypic clade (Figure 1) [3,4,14].
A natural question emerges from our comparative approach: do interspecific differences in external gland features reflect differences in species-specific functionality? There are two documented uses of the sternal glands within Vespa. The first is the use of the van der Vecht gland by the giant hornets V. mandarinia and V. soror for nestmate recruitment during group attacks on social insect prey [11,32]. Secondly, there is an association across the Vespidae broadly between the presence of the van der Vecht gland and nest founding by independent foundresses [28], as well as an ability of secretions from foundresses and workers to repel ants, demonstrated mostly by studies of polistines [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,43]. In Vespa, Matsuura ([76,77] in [42]) briefly noted that foundresses of aerial-nesting species rub their gasters on nest petioles when colonies are workerless and nest envelopes are incomplete. However, subsequent observations suggest that this protection is employed beyond these specific circumstances. Makino [42] observed a V. analis foundress rubbing her gaster on the pedicel of a nest after the nest envelope was completed. Furthermore, Martin [31] demonstrated ant repellency from the secretions of both the van der Vecht and Richards glands of workers and queens for species with different nesting sites: V. affinis, which nests aerially in open spaces [2,78], and V. tropica, which nests above or below ground in enclosed cavities [1,2,9,65,79].
These observations suggest that secretions from either gland could potentially be used by Vespa workers for nest defense, and that repellency is conceivably helpful beyond the pre-emergence period (when workers are present) and under diverse nesting scenarios. In contrast to Matsuura’s observations of foundresses, we did not find strong evidence in workers that an aerial nesting habit was linked to comparatively more developed external sternal gland morphology. V. affinis, V. analis, and V. velutina (to a lesser degree) are reliable aerial nesters [1,2,9,31,64,67,78,80], yet gland structures for workers of these species did not suggest increased functionality relative to other species (i.e., their glands were comparatively small, particularly pore number for the van der Vecht gland). In contrast, the four species in the tropica group had universally well-developed sternal gland features, but all of them construct nests underground (although above ground occasionally for the giant hornets and more commonly for V. tropica and V. ducalis, [1,2,9,12,65,78,79,81,82,83]). Ant predation pressure is expected to be greater at ground level compared to above ground in vegetation [60], which could contribute to selection for well-developed sternal glands in this lineage. However, a more important selective pressure for this group is probably the foraging behavior of workers (see below) because the remaining species—V. crabro and V. simillima—also regularly nest underground [1,2,9,64,78], but do not show clear affiliation with the oversized gland morphology of the tropica group. In general, how much hornet species vary in the need for anti-ant defenses after the founding stage is unclear, as is the nature of those defenses. Large workers may easily deflect ants from nests through physical means alone. A chemical defense could be important for species with relatively small colonies, like those of V. ducalis, which has a maximum mean of 15 workers present at maturity in Japan, and are similarly small in China and Taiwan [79]. Furthermore, lack of reports of worker participation in ant defense may be a result of the inherent difficulty of making these observations in enveloped or underground nests, leading to conclusions that only queens of aerial, not-yet-enveloped nests use sternal glands for this purpose [42,76,77].
If a function of either sternal gland in Vespa workers is to secrete ant-defense chemicals, it is possible that, rather than nesting habit, geographic location may exert greater influence on gland features. Predation pressure from ants is considered a major selective force that drives nesting biology in social wasps [84], and this pressure increases as latitude decreases in both the Americas and Asia [60,61]. In Asian Polistes, observed increases in ant predation with decreasing latitude are paired with a latitudinal gradient in gastral rubbing behavior by foundresses [61]. How these observations extend to Vespa workers remains unclear, but if sternal glands contribute to ant defense (as in [31]), we can make some predictions. For example, V. crabro and V. simillima workers, which are restricted to temperate zones, should have reduced gland structures compared to subtropical or tropical Vespa species such as V. soror, V. tropica, V. ducalis, and V. affinis. However, this was not always the case. Of the giant hornets, the more southerly V. soror should have relatively larger glands than V. mandarinia that originate from more northern locations, which was also not the case. Interestingly, intraspecific trends for specimens from geographically widespread locations were suggestive. Gland features of the V. mandarinia worker from Taiwan were appreciably larger than those of the specimen from Japan, as were the features of the V. velutina workers from Taiwan and Vietnam compared to the specimens from France, where they have been recently introduced from a more northerly region in China [85] (Table S1). More in-depth sampling is necessary to explore the intriguing possibility of intraspecific differences in gland features along latitudinal gradients.
Based on the information that is available about these nine Vespa species, hunting behavior better explains comparative gland morphology than defense of nests against ants. A well-documented use of the van der Vecht gland within Vespa is for recruitment by giant hornet workers of nestmates during group attacks on colonies of other social insects. Both V. mandarinia and V. soror workers rub their gasters on the surfaces of prey nests during the early stages of an attack [11,12,13,32]. Field observations suggest that the Richards and other gastral glands may also be involved in this behavior [32]. The most well-supported explanation for the substantial size of the giant hornets’ sternal glands is their use for this purpose. However, the closely related species V. tropica and V. ducalis have similarly sized gland features. V. tropica, while often considered a solitary hunter [9,79], has also been reported to attack prey wasp colonies in groups of nestmates. In Japan, Sakagami and Fukushima [86] observed that V. tropica workers return to prey nests with one or two nestmates after an initial attack by one hornet. Seeley et al. [87] described a half-hour group attack in Thailand by three V. tropica workers that resulted in the forced abandonment of an A. florea nest, which the hornets subsequently plundered. In Vietnam, we also observed the assembly of V. tropica nestmates at the nest of honey bee prey; in one instance, three V. tropica workers performed oral trophallaxis on an A. cerana bee hive. Polistine wasps are considered the species’ main prey [9,86], which is the case for V. ducalis too [79]. Presumably, hunting in groups may improve the success of attacks on other colonies of social insect prey, as it does for giant hornets. Observations such as these have prompted speculation that V. tropica workers use pheromone communication for nestmate recruitment in the field [86], which would be an intriguing explanation for their well-developed sternal glands.
Another scenario in which pheromone-mediated recruitment by hornet workers could be important is during nest relocation. Of the species that we studied, V. crabro, V. simillima, and V. velutina relocate nests to secondary locations when they outgrow their original nest locations, at high rates of up to 56%, 90%, and 70% of colonies, respectively [1,2,6,9,62,63,64,65,66,67]. Scout workers settle at candidate nest sites and are visited by other workers; they accumulate over days at a preferred site and are eventually joined by the queen. The signals that coordinate this process are unknown [6], but it is hypothesized that chemical communication may facilitate these moves, which can involve travel up to 200 m from the original nest [1]. In some polistines, secretions from the Richards gland are used to guide swarm movement [46,47], although Richards glands are not found in all swarming species [26]. If sternal glands play a signaling role during nest relocation in V. simillima, V. velutina, or V. crabro, it is not manifested as relatively larger Richards glands compared to hornet species that do not construct secondary nests. Giant hornets have the largest Richards glands (scaled for size), but they excavate their nest cavities to accommodate growth rather than undergoing nest relocation. We are unable to make inferences about what drives selection for the Richards gland in Vespa workers, primarily because there is so little information available about how and when they use this gland. To date, evidence is limited to the attraction of V. velutina males to Richards gland secretions from gynes [48]. This mystery is not restricted to this genus only. Decades since it was first described by Richards [49], a broad purpose for this eponymous gland remains elusive, despite it being as large or many times larger than the van der Vecht gland in all hornet workers that were examined. The Richards gland must have an important function, but we do not yet understand how hornets use it.

5. Conclusions

While workers of all Vespa species that we examined had van der Vecht and Richards glands in similar configurations, these glands varied in the extent to which they were expressed externally. These differences persisted even when interspecific size differences were considered. Nevertheless, it was difficult to tie differences in morphology to the selective pressures that various subgroups of these species face, aside from hefty gland features that support group-hunting in the giant hornets (and possibly close relatives in their clade). For the most part, this effort was stymied by a lack of information about the use of sternal glands by hornet workers, a problem that extends to exocrine gland function for social wasps generally [43]. Moreover, many authors have highlighted how difficult it is to observe the behavior of defensive hornets within their well-fortified nests [1,6,42]. Future fieldwork that can overcome these barriers and focus on the social contexts that we have outlined may illuminate the selective pressures that have shaped sternal gland morphology in the hornets. This research would be complemented by studies of the chemistry and internal fine structure of the pheromone-producing glands within Vespa (e.g., [54]).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11020245/s1, Figure S1: Measurements taken from specimens, with images of V. velutina as an example; Table S1: Size of features associated with the van der Vecht and Richards glands for workers of the same species, but from different geographical locations; Excel File S1: Data and code from the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.R.M. and G.W.O.; methodology, H.R.M., G.W.O., J.B., L.T.P.N. and S.S.; formal analysis, H.R.M.; investigation, H.R.M., G.W.O., J.B. and S.S.; data curation, H.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.R.M.; writing—review and editing, H.R.M., G.W.O., J.B., L.T.P.N. and S.S.; visualization, H.R.M. and J.B.; funding acquisition, H.R.M., G.W.O., L.T.P.N. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration (to G.W.O., H.R.M., and L.T.P.N.: grant number 9338-13), a bilateral grant agreement between the Bulgarian Academy of Science and the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (to L.T.P.N.: grant number QTBG01.01/21-22), the Asahi Glass Foundation (to S.S.), the Tokyo Metropolitan University Fund for TMU Strategic Research (SS collaborator and grant leader: Noriaki Murakami, FY2020–22), and Wellesley College (to H.R.M.: Department of Biological Sciences, McNair Scholars Program, Provost’s Office).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data and statistical codes are provided as Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to our colleagues who provided us with hornet specimens for this project: Jung-Tai Chao, Sheng-Shan Lu, Shuhei Nomura, Masato Ono, Steven Paiero and Adrien Perrard. In Vietnam, sample collection was assisted by Quan Viet Phung, Nhung Van Ly, Hai Minh Tran, and Xuat Van Pham. We thank Elyse Roach (Molecular and Cellular Imaging Facility, University of Guelph) and Alex Vrijdaghs (University of Leuven) for assistance with imaging. We greatly appreciate conversations with Holly Downing and Robert Jeanne about the terminology and biology of wasp glands and with Adrien Perrard about the Vespa phylogeny we cited. Erica Maul and Sophia Peña (Wellesley College) contributed to a review of the literature.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Matsuura, M.; Yamane, S. Biology of the Vespine Wasps; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer, M.E. Vespine Wasps of the World: Behaviour, Ecology and Taxonomy of the Vespinae; Siri Scientific Press: Manchester, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Perrard, A.; Pickett, K.M.; Villemant, C.; Kojima, J.; Carpenter, J. Phylogeny of hornets: A total evidence approach (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Vespinae, Vespa). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2013, 32, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Perrard, A.; Lopez-Osorio, F.; Carpenter, J.M. Phylogeny, landmark analysis and the use of wing venation to study the evolution of social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Vespinae). Cladistics 2016, 32, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smith-Pardo, A.H.; Carpenter, J.M.; Kimsey, L. The diversity of hornets in the genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Vespinae), their importance and interceptions in the United States. Insect Syst. Divers. 2020, 4, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matsuura, M. Vespa and Provespa. In The Social Biology of Wasps; Ross, K.G., Matthews, R.W., Eds.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 232–262. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brodmann, J.; Twele, R.; Francke, W.; Luo, Y.; Song, X.; Ayasse, M. Orchid mimics honey bee alarm pheromone in order to attract hornets for pollination. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1368–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Wei, W.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; Wei, X.; Lu, W.; Zheng, X. Diversity, daily activity patterns, and pollination effectiveness of the insects visiting Camellia osmantha, C. vietnamensis, and C. oleifera in South China. Insects 2019, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Matsuura, M. Comparative biology of the five Japanese species of the genus Vespa (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Bull. Fac. Agric. Mie Univ. 1984, 69, 1–131. [Google Scholar]
  10. Matsuura, M.; Sakagami, S.F. A bionomic sketch of the giant hornet, Vespa mandarinia, a serious pest for Japanese apiculture. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VI Zool. 1973, 19, 125–162. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ono, M.; Igarashi, T.; Ohno, E.; Sasaki, M. Unusual thermal defence by a honeybee against mass attack by hornets. Nature 1995, 377, 334–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, J.X.Q. A note on Vespa soror (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Entomol. Bull. 2009, 1, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mattila, H.R.; Otis, G.W.; Nguyen, L.T.P.; Pham, H.D.; Knight, O.M.; Phan, N.T. Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Archer, M.E. A phylogenetic study of the species of the genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespinae). Entomol. Scand. 1993, 24, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bank, S.; Sann, M.; Mayer, C.; Meusemann, K.; Donath, A.; Podsiadlowski, L.; Kozlov, A.; Petersen, M.; Krogmann, L.; Meier, R.; et al. Transcriptome and target DNA enrichment sequence data provide new insights into the phylogeny of vespid wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata: Vespidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 116, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Piekarski, P.K.; Carpenter, J.M.; Lemmon, A.R.; Lemmon, E.M.; Sharanowski, B.J. Phylogenomic evidence overturns current conceptions of social evolution in wasps (Vespidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 2097–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Downing, H.A. The function and evolution of exocrine glands. In The Social Biology of Wasps; Ross, K.G., Matthews, R.W., Eds.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 540–569. [Google Scholar]
  18. da Silva, M.; Noll, F.B.; Billen, J. Sternal exocrine glands in neotropical social wasps. In Neotropical Social Wasps; Prezoto, F., Nascimento, F.S., Barbosa, B.C., Somavilla, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 213–234. [Google Scholar]
  19. Noirot, C.; Quennedey, A. Fine structure of insect epidermal glands. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1974, 19, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noirot, C.; Quennedey, A. Glands, gland cells, glandular units: Some comments on terminology and classification. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 1991, 27, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  21. Billen, J.; Šobotník, J. Insect exocrine glands. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2015, 44, 399–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Landolt, P.J.; Akre, R.D. Occurrence and location of exocrine glands in some social Vespidae (Hymenoptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1979, 72, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Post, D.C.; Jeanne, R.L. Morphology of the sternal glands of Polistes fuscatus and P. canadensis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Psyche 1980, 87, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jeanne, R.L.; Post, D.C. Richards’ gland and associated cuticular modifications in social wasps of the genus Polybia Lepeletier (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Polistinae, Polybiini). Insectes Sociaux 1982, 29, 280–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jeanne, R.L.; Downing, H.A.; Post, D.C. Morphology and function of sternal glands in polistine wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Zoomorphology 1983, 103, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smith, A.R.; O’Donnell, S.; Jeanne, R.L. Evolution of swarm communication in eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Insect Behav. 2002, 15, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Samacá, E.; Billen, J.; Sarmiento, C.E. Morphology of the fifth sternal glands of Neotropical social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Polistinae). Invertebr. Biol. 2013, 132, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Smith, A.R.; O’Donnell, S.; Jeanne, R.L. Correlated evolution of colony defence and social structure: A comparative analysis in eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 2001, 3, 331–344. [Google Scholar]
  29. Heselhaus, F. Die Hautdrüsen der Apiden und verwandter Formen. Zool. Jahrbücher Abt. Anat. Ontog. Tiere 1922, 43, 369–464. [Google Scholar]
  30. Van der Vecht, J. The terminal gastral sternite of female and worker social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. C 1968, 71, 411–422. [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin, S.J. Colony defence against ants in Vespa. Insectes Sociaux 1992, 39, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mattila, H.R.; Shimano, S.; Otis, G.W.; Nguyen, L.T.P.; Maul, E.R.; Billen, J. Linking the morphology of sternal glands to rubbing behavior by Vespa soror (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) workers during recruitment for group predation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2021, saab048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jeanne, R.L. Chemical defense of brood by a social wasp. Science 1970, 168, 1465–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hermann, H.R.; Dirks, T.F. Sternal glands in polistine wasps: Morphology and associated behavior. J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 1974, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  35. Turillazzi, S.; Ugolini, A. Rubbing behaviour in some European Polistes (Hymenoptera Vespidae). Monit. Zool. Ital. 1979, 13, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  36. Post, D.C.; Jeanne, R.L. Colony defense against ants by Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Wisconsin. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1981, 54, 599–615. [Google Scholar]
  37. Litte, M. Social biology of the Polistine wasp Mischocyttarus labiatus: Survival in a Colombian rain forest. Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. 1981, 327, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kojima, J. Defense of the pre-emergence colony against ants by means of a chemical barrier in Ropalidia fasciata (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Jap. J. Ecol. 1983, 33, 213–233. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kojima, J. The ant repellent function of the rubbing substance in an Old World polistine, Parapolybia indica (Hymenoptera Vespidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1992, 4, 183–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Keeping, M.G. Rubbing behavior and morphology of van der Vecht’s gland in Belonogaster petiolata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Insect Behav. 1990, 3, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dani, F.R.; Cannoni, S.; Turillazzi, S.; Morgan, E.D. Ant repellent effect of the sternal gland secretion of Polistes dominulus (Christ) and P. sulcifer (Zimmermann) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Makino, S. Gastral rubbing on nest pedicel by the founding queen of the hornet Vespa analis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Sociobiology 2010, 56, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jeanne, R.L. The evolution of exocrine gland function in wasps. In Natural History and the Evolution of Paper Wasps; Turillazzi, S., West-Eberhard, M.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 144–160. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dani, F.R.; Cervo, R.; Turillazzi, S. Abdomen stroking behaviour and its possible functions in Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Behav. Process. 1992, 28, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dapporto, L.; Santini, A.; Dani, F.R.; Turillazzi, S. Workers of a Polistes paper wasp detect the presence of their queen by chemical cues. Chem. Senses 2007, 32, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Naumann, M.G. Swarming behavior: Evidence for communication in social wasps. Science 1975, 189, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jeanne, R.L. Chemical communication during swarm emigration in the social wasp Polybia sericea (Olivier). Anim. Behav. 1981, 29, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wen, P.; Cheng, Y.-N.; Dong, S.-H.; Wang, Z.-W.; Tan, K.; Nieh, J.C. The sex pheromone of a globally invasive honey bee predator, the Asian eusocial hornet, Vespa velutina. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Richards, O.W. The biology of the social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Biol. Rev. 1971, 46, 183–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Turillazzi, S. Tegumental glands in the abdomen of some European Polistes (Hymenoptera Vespidae). Monit. Zool. Ital. 1979, 13, 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  51. Da Silva, M.; Noll, F.B.; Billen, J. Morphology of Richards’ gland in the swarm-founding wasp Protonectarina sylveirae (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Acta Zool. 2015, 96, 530–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Makino, S.; Yamane, S.; Ban, T.; Kunou, I. The Japanese hornet Vespa simillima Smith, an important nuisance pest in urban areas (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Jap. J. Sanit. Zool. 1981, 32, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Matsuura, M. Ecological study on Vespine wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) attacking honeybee colonies: I. Seasonal changes in the frequency of visits to apiaries by vespine wasps and damage inflicted, especially in the absence of artificial protection. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1988, 23, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ono, M.; Terabe, H.; Hori, H.; Sasaki, M. Insect signalling: Components of giant hornet alarm pheromone. Nature 2003, 424, 637–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Choi, M.B.; Martin, S.J.; Lee, J.W. Distribution, spread, and impact of the invasive hornet Vespa velutina in South Korea. J Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2012, 15, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Monceau, K.; Bonnard, O.; Thiéry, D. Vespa velutina: A new invasive predator of honeybees in Europe. J. Pest. Sci. 2014, 87, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cini, A.; Cappa, F.; Petrocelli, I.; Pepiciello, I.; Bortolotti, L.; Cervo, R. Competition between the native and the introduced hornets Vespa crabro and Vespa velutina: A comparison of potentially relevant life-history traits. Ecol. Entomol. 2018, 43, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Fedele, E.; Gervasini, E.; De Jesus Cardoso, A.; La Notte, A.; Vallecillo Rodriguez, S.; Tsiamis, K.; Maes, J. Invasive Alien Species Impact on Ecosystem Services; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  59. Barbet-Massin, M.; Salles, J.-M.; Courchamp, F. The economic cost of control of the invasive yellow-legged Asian hornet. NeoBiota 2020, 55, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jeanne, R.L. A latitudinal gradient in rates of ant predation. Ecology 1979, 60, 1211–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kojima, J. A latitudinal gradient in intensity of applying ant-repellent substance to the nest petiole in paper wasps (Hymeno-ptera: Vespidae). Insectes Sociaux 1993, 40, 403–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Archer, M.E. Secondary nests of Vespa crabro L. (Hym., Vespidae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 1984, 120, 125. [Google Scholar]
  63. Archer, M.E. Secondary nests of the hornet, Vespa crabro (L.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), produce queens. Proc. Trans. Br. Entomol. Nat. Hist. Soc. 1985, 18, 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  64. Archer, M.E. Taxonomy, distribution and nesting biology of the Vespa bicolor group (Hym., Vespinae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 1994, 130, 149–158. [Google Scholar]
  65. Archer, M.E. Taxonomy, distribution and nesting biology of species of the genera Provespa Ashmead and Vespa Linneaus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 2008, 144, 69–101. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pawlyszyn, B. Nest relocation in the British hornet Vespa crabro gribodoi Bequaert (Hym., Vespidae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 1992, 128, 203–205. [Google Scholar]
  67. Rome, Q.; Muller, F.J.; Touret-Alby, A.; Darrouzet, E.; Perrard, A.; Villemant, C. Caste differentiation and seasonal changes in Vespa velutina (Hym.: Vespidae) colonies in its introduced range. J. Appl. Entomol. 2015, 139, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kimsey, L.S.; Carpenter, J.M. The Vespinae of North America (Vespidae, Hymenoptera). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2012, 28, 37–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Kozak, P.; Otis, G.W. New honey bee pests in North America: A guide to Asian hornets that affect honey bees. Bee Cult. 2020, 148, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  70. Billen, J. Exocrine glands and their key function in the communication system of social insects. Formos. Entomol. 2011, 31, 75–84. [Google Scholar]
  71. Dapporto, L.; Petrocelli, I.; Turillazzi, S. Incipient morphological castes in Polistes gallicus. Zoomorphology 2011, 130, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Petrocelli, I.; Turillazzi, S. Comparative morphology of Van der Vecht’s organ in Polistes social parasites: Host ecology and adaptation of the parasite. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2013, 109, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Petrocelli, I.; Turillazzi, S. The morphology of Van der Vecht’s organ as a tool to measure caste dimorphism in Polistes paper wasps: A comparative approach. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2013, 51, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. De Souza, A.R.; Petrocelli, I.; Lino-Neto, J.; Santos, E.F.; Noll, F.B.; Turillazzi, S. Ontogenic caste differences in the Van der Vecht organ of primitively eusocial neotropical paper wasps. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. De Souza, A.R.; Baptista, C.F.; Lino-Neto, J. The sternal brush of the Van der Vecht organ scales isometrically with body size: Implications for the study of incipient morphological castes in primitively eusocial wasps. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 29, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Matsuura, M. Colony defence strategies of social wasps and bees. Ecology of social wasps and bees. Insectarium 1983, 20, 254–260. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  77. Matsuura, M. Social Wasps of Japan in Color; Hokkaido University Press: Sapporo, Japan, 1995; (In Japanese with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  78. Van der Vecht, J. The Vespinae of the Indo-Malayan and Papuan areas (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zool. Verh. 1957, 34, 1–83. [Google Scholar]
  79. Archer, M.E. Taxonomy and bionomics of the Vespa tropica group (Hym., Vespinae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 1991, 127, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  80. Archer, M.E. Taxonomy, distribution and nesting biology of Vespa affinis (L.) and Vespa mocsaryana du Buysson (Hym., Vespinae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 1997, 133, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  81. Yamane, S.; Makino, S. Bionomics of Vespa analis insularis and V. mandarinia latilineata in Hokkaido, northern Japan, with notes on vespine embryo nests (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Insecta Matsumurana 1977, 12, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  82. Starr, C.K.; Jacobson, R.S. Nest structure in Philippine hornets (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Vespa spp.). Jap. J. Entomol. 1990, 58, 125–143. [Google Scholar]
  83. Archer, M.E. Taxonomy, distribution and nesting biology of the Vespa mandarinia group (Hym., Vespinae). Entomol. Month. Mag. 1995, 131, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  84. Jeanne, R.L. The adaptiveness of social wasp nest architecture. Quart. Rev. Biol. 1975, 50, 267–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Arca, M.; Mougel, F.; Guillemaud, T.; Dupas, S.; Rome, Q.; Perrard, A.; Muller, F.; Fossoud, A.; Capdevielle-Dulac, C.; Torres-Leguizamon, M.; et al. Reconstructing the invasion and the demographic history of the yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina, in Europe. Biol. Invasions 2015, 17, 2357–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sakagami, S.F.; Fukushima, K. Some biological observations on a hornet, Vespa tropica var. pulchra (Du Buysson), with special reference to its dependence on Polistes wasps (Hymenoptera). Treubia 1957, 24, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  87. Seeley, T.D.; Seeley, R.H.; Akratanakul, A. Colony defense strategies of the honeybees of Thailand. Ecol. Monogr. 1982, 52, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 11 00245 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogeny of the genus Vespa (19 of 22 species). Relationships are supported by a combined analysis of morphological characteristics, wing-venation landmarks, and molecular data, modified after Perrard et al.’s Figure 8 [4]. The nine species examined in this study are indicated by blue text; the arrow indicates the root of the ‘tropica group’ [4,14].
Figure 1. Phylogeny of the genus Vespa (19 of 22 species). Relationships are supported by a combined analysis of morphological characteristics, wing-venation landmarks, and molecular data, modified after Perrard et al.’s Figure 8 [4]. The nine species examined in this study are indicated by blue text; the arrow indicates the root of the ‘tropica group’ [4,14].
Biology 11 00245 g001
Biology 11 00245 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of the sixth metasomal sternite and van der Vecht gland of nine Vespa species (a–i). Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Lateral pore clusters and the hyaline region with the sternal brush are outlined by a dashed white line in (a). Bars indicate 1 mm for scale.
Figure 2. SEM images of the sixth metasomal sternite and van der Vecht gland of nine Vespa species (a–i). Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Lateral pore clusters and the hyaline region with the sternal brush are outlined by a dashed white line in (a). Bars indicate 1 mm for scale.
Biology 11 00245 g002
Biology 11 00245 g003 550
Figure 3. Significant correlations across species between features of the sternal glands. (a) Van der Vecht gland size (number of pore openings) increased as the size of the sixth metasomal sternite increased. (b) Mean pore diameter increased as van der Vecht gland size (area of pore openings) increased. (c,d) The same relationships are provided for the Richards gland on the fifth metasomal sternite. All estimates were pooled across images of specimens within species (species abbreviations are in gray).
Figure 3. Significant correlations across species between features of the sternal glands. (a) Van der Vecht gland size (number of pore openings) increased as the size of the sixth metasomal sternite increased. (b) Mean pore diameter increased as van der Vecht gland size (area of pore openings) increased. (c,d) The same relationships are provided for the Richards gland on the fifth metasomal sternite. All estimates were pooled across images of specimens within species (species abbreviations are in gray).
Biology 11 00245 g003
Biology 11 00245 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of the lateral cluster of pore openings of the van der Vecht gland on the sixth metasomal sternite of nine Vespa species (a–i). Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. The boundary of a lateral pore cluster is outlined by a white dashed line in (a). Bars indicate 100 μm for scale; sb = sternal brush.
Figure 4. SEM images of the lateral cluster of pore openings of the van der Vecht gland on the sixth metasomal sternite of nine Vespa species (a–i). Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. The boundary of a lateral pore cluster is outlined by a white dashed line in (a). Bars indicate 100 μm for scale; sb = sternal brush.
Biology 11 00245 g004
Biology 11 00245 g005 550
Figure 5. Gland area relative to sternite size across Vespa species. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. (a) Percentage of the total surface area of the anterior cuticle of the sixth metasomal sternite that was covered by gland-associated structures of the van der Vecht gland, which includes area of the paired pore clusters added to the area of the hyaline region with the sternal brush. (b) Percentage of the anterior of the fifth metasomal sternite that was covered by the band of pores of the Richards gland.
Figure 5. Gland area relative to sternite size across Vespa species. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. (a) Percentage of the total surface area of the anterior cuticle of the sixth metasomal sternite that was covered by gland-associated structures of the van der Vecht gland, which includes area of the paired pore clusters added to the area of the hyaline region with the sternal brush. (b) Percentage of the anterior of the fifth metasomal sternite that was covered by the band of pores of the Richards gland.
Biology 11 00245 g005
Biology 11 00245 g006 550
Figure 6. High magnification SEM images of the van der Vecht gland showing differences in cuti-cular texture across species. Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. The region where pores overlap with setae at the margin of the sternal brush is shown in (a,c,g). Regions of pore clusters without setae are shown in (b,d–f,h,i). Bars indicate 20 μm for scale; s = seta of sternal brush; p = pore opening.
Figure 6. High magnification SEM images of the van der Vecht gland showing differences in cuti-cular texture across species. Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. The region where pores overlap with setae at the margin of the sternal brush is shown in (a,c,g). Regions of pore clusters without setae are shown in (b,d–f,h,i). Bars indicate 20 μm for scale; s = seta of sternal brush; p = pore opening.
Biology 11 00245 g006
Biology 11 00245 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM images of the fifth metasomal sternite and the Richards gland of nine Vespa species (a–i). Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. The anterior band of pores of the Richards gland is outlined by a dashed white line in (a). Composite images (made from images of the same specimen) are shown in (b,i). Bars indicate 1 mm for scale.
Figure 7. SEM images of the fifth metasomal sternite and the Richards gland of nine Vespa species (a–i). Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. The anterior band of pores of the Richards gland is outlined by a dashed white line in (a). Composite images (made from images of the same specimen) are shown in (b,i). Bars indicate 1 mm for scale.
Biology 11 00245 g007
Biology 11 00245 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM images of nine Vespa species (a–i) showing the lateral margin of the band of pores of the Richards gland. Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Bars indicate 100 μm for scale; s = seta.
Figure 8. SEM images of nine Vespa species (a–i) showing the lateral margin of the band of pores of the Richards gland. Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Bars indicate 100 μm for scale; s = seta.
Biology 11 00245 g008
Biology 11 00245 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of nine Vespa species (a–i) showing high-resolution detail for pore openings of the Richards gland. Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Bars indicate 10 μm for scale; p = pore, s = seta.
Figure 9. SEM images of nine Vespa species (a–i) showing high-resolution detail for pore openings of the Richards gland. Anterior is at the top. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Bars indicate 10 μm for scale; p = pore, s = seta.
Biology 11 00245 g009
Table
Table 1. Sources of worker specimens for nine Vespa species, with available details about their locations, geographical coordinates, and collection dates (month/year if known).
Table 1. Sources of worker specimens for nine Vespa species, with available details about their locations, geographical coordinates, and collection dates (month/year if known).
SpeciesnLocationCoordinatesDateSource
V. soror
du Buysson, 1905		3Da Chong, Ba Vi district,
Hanoi Prov., Vietnam		21.118° N, 105.335° ESeptember 2013G.W. Otis,
pers. coll.
2Muong Leo, Sop Cop district,
Son La Prov., Vietnam		20.836° N, 103.308° EOctober 2020L.T.P. Nguyen,
pers. coll.
V. mandarinia Smith, 18521Tamugawa-gakuen,
Machida City, Tokyo, Japan		35.56° N, 139.46° ESeptember 2019M. Ono,
Tamagawa Univ.
1Lianhuachi Nursery,
Nantou County, Taiwan		23.922° N, 120.886° EAugust 2015J.-T. Chao, Taiwan
Forestry Res. Inst.
V. tropica
(Linnaeus, 1758)		1Da Chong, Ba Vi district,
Hanoi Prov., Vietnam		21.118° N, 105.335° ESeptember 2013G.W. Otis,
pers. coll.
V. ducalis
Smith 1852		2Ngoc Dong, Yen Lap district,
Phu Tho Prov., Vietnam		21.242° N, 105.150° EAugust 2013G.W. Otis,
pers. coll.
V. crabro
Linnaeus, 1758		1Plougras, Brittany, France49.498° N, 3.546° ESeptember 2018S. Paiero, Univ. Guelph Insect Coll.
3Leuven, Belgium50.876° N, 4.701° ESeptember 2020J. Billen,
pers. coll.
1Oakville, Ontario, Canada43.466° N, 79.785°WSeptember 2013S. Paiero, Univ. Guelph Insect Coll.
V. affinis
(Linnaeus, 1764)		1Da Chong, Ba Vi district,
Hanoi Prov., Vietnam		21.118° N, 105.335° ESeptember 2013G.W. Otis,
pers. coll.
V. simillima Smith, 18681Tsukuba Bot. Garden, Akakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Pref., Japan36.103° N, 140.113° EJuly 2020S. Nomura, Nat. Mus. Nature and Science
V. velutina Lepeletier, 18361Taipei Feitsui Reservoir,
Taiwan		24.905° N, 121.562° EJune 2020J.-T. Chao, Taiwan
Forestry Res. Inst.
1Son Tho, Vu Quang district,
Ha Tinh Prov., Vietnam		18.414° N, 105.443° EMay 2012G.W. Otis,
pers. coll.
2Sergeac, Aquitaine Region,
south France		45.0° N,
1.1° E		2010A. Perrard, Inst. Ecol.
Envir. Sci., Univ. Paris
V. analis
Fabricius, 1775		1Tsukuba Bot. Garden, Akakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Pref., Japan36.103° N, 140.113° EJuly 2020S. Nomura, Nat. Mus. Nature and Science
Table
Table 2. Size of features associated with the van der Vecht gland for nine Vespa species. Focal species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Pore number includes both lateral clusters. Total area of gland-associated structures includes pore openings and the hyaline region containing the sternal brush. Sternite area extends from its anterior margin to the posterior margin of the smooth cuticle; setal length is given as a percentage of the distance at the midline between the aforementioned cuticular margins (see Figure S1). All estimates were pooled across images of specimens within species. Different letters indicate significant differences among species in pore diameter. Pore number for each species was rounded to the closest hundred.
Table 2. Size of features associated with the van der Vecht gland for nine Vespa species. Focal species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Pore number includes both lateral clusters. Total area of gland-associated structures includes pore openings and the hyaline region containing the sternal brush. Sternite area extends from its anterior margin to the posterior margin of the smooth cuticle; setal length is given as a percentage of the distance at the midline between the aforementioned cuticular margins (see Figure S1). All estimates were pooled across images of specimens within species. Different letters indicate significant differences among species in pore diameter. Pore number for each species was rounded to the closest hundred.
SpeciesNumber of PoresPore Area
(mm2)		Hyaline Area (mm2)Total
Area
(mm2)		Sternite Area (mm2)Pore
Diameter (μm ± SD)		% Length of
Setae Relative
to Sternite
V. soror47000.762.853.618.143.8 ± 0.5 a69.3
V. mandarinia53000.903.394.299.914.1 ± 0.8 a62.9
V. tropica59001.081.532.616.624.4 ± 0.7 b58.7
V. ducalis37000.931.772.706.415.0 ± 0.7 c58.7
V. crabro32000.200.871.073.672.9 ± 0.4 d56.2
V. affinis21000.240.520.763.853.0 ± 0.5 d29.4
V. simillima12000.230.210.442.362.8 ± 0.6 d34.3
V. velutina15000.180.290.472.512.8 ± 0.4 d30.9
V. analis15000.221.962.185.302.9 ± 0.5 d38.9
Table
Table 3. Size of features associated with the Richards gland for nine Vespa species. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Sternite area extends from the anterior cuticle margin to posterior margin where the smooth cuticle ends (see Figure S1). All estimates were pooled across images of specimens within species. Different letters indicate significant differences among species in pore diameter. Pore number for each species was rounded to the closest hundred.
Table 3. Size of features associated with the Richards gland for nine Vespa species. Species are presented in the order in which they appear in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1. Sternite area extends from the anterior cuticle margin to posterior margin where the smooth cuticle ends (see Figure S1). All estimates were pooled across images of specimens within species. Different letters indicate significant differences among species in pore diameter. Pore number for each species was rounded to the closest hundred.
SpeciesNumber of PoresPore Area
(mm2)		Sternite Area (mm2)Pore Diameter
(μm ± SD)
V. soror15,5001.9210.755.0 ± 0.5 a
V. mandarinia21,5002.7612.655.0 ± 0.6 a
V. tropica65001.187.804.5 ± 0.6 b
V. ducalis82001.499.044.9 ± 0.6 a
V. crabro34000.726.222.8 ± 0.6 e
V. affinis16000.504.803.1 ± 0.4 d
V. simillima30000.413.692.9 ± 0.5 e
V. velutina24000.443.653.7 ± 0.8 d
V. analis61000.756.873.8 ± 0.4 c
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mattila, H.R.; Otis, G.W.; Billen, J.; Nguyen, L.T.P.; Shimano, S. Comparison of the External Morphology of the Sternal Glands for Hornets in the Genus Vespa. Biology 2022, 11, 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020245

AMA Style

Mattila HR, Otis GW, Billen J, Nguyen LTP, Shimano S. Comparison of the External Morphology of the Sternal Glands for Hornets in the Genus Vespa. Biology. 2022; 11(2):245. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mattila, Heather R., Gard W. Otis, Johan Billen, Lien T. P. Nguyen, and Satoshi Shimano. 2022. "Comparison of the External Morphology of the Sternal Glands for Hornets in the Genus Vespa" Biology 11, no. 2: 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020245

APA Style

Mattila, H. R., Otis, G. W., Billen, J., Nguyen, L. T. P., & Shimano, S. (2022). Comparison of the External Morphology of the Sternal Glands for Hornets in the Genus Vespa. Biology, 11(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop