Next Article in Journal
Identifying Blunt Force Traumatic Injury on Thermally Altered Remains: A Pilot Study Using Sus scrofa
Previous Article in Journal
The Effectiveness of the Sexual Reproduction in Selected Clonal and Nonclonal Species of the Genus Ranunculus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/biology11010086
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Uncovering the Role of PhzC as DAHP Synthase in Shikimate Pathway of Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66

by
Songwei Wang
1,
Dongliang Liu
2,
Muhammad Bilal
3,
Wei Wang
1 and
Xuehong Zhang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200031, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
3
School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian 211600, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(1), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010086
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Revised: 2 January 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigated PhzC, one essential 3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosnate-7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase that catalyzes the first step of the shikimate pathway in Pseudomonas chlororaphis. We identified and characterized phzC, which is different from the reported DAHP synthase encoding genes aroF, aroG and aroH in E. coli. PhzC accounts for approximately 90% of the total DAHP synthase activities in P. chlororaphis and it plays the most critical role in four DAHP synthases in the shikimate pathway. Moreover, the results showed that phzC in P. chlororaphis HT66 is not sensitive to feedback inhibition. This study demonstrated that PhzC is essential for phenazine-1-carboxamide (PCN) biosynthesis without inhibition in feedback by PCN production. It highlighted the importance of PhzC and applying P. chlororaphis for shikimate pathway-derived high-value biological production.

Abstract

DAHP synthase catalyzes the first step in the shikimate pathway, deriving the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids (Trp, Phe and Tyr), phenazine-1-carboxamide, folic acid, and ubiquinone in Pseudomonas chlororaphis. In this study, we identified and characterized one DAHP synthase encoding gene phzC, which differs from the reported DAHP synthase encoding genes aroF, aroG and aroH in E. coli. PhzC accounts for approximately 90% of the total DAHP synthase activities in P. chlororaphis HT66 and plays the most critical role in four DAHP synthases in the shikimate pathway. Inactivation of phzC resulted in the reduction of PCN production by more than 90%, while the absence of genes aroF, aroG and aroH reduced PCN yield by less than 15%, and the production of PCN was restored after the complementation of gene phzC. Moreover, the results showed that phzC in P. chlororaphis HT66 is not sensitive to feedback inhibition. This study demonstrated that gene phzC is essential for PCN biosynthesis. The expression level of both phzC and phzE genes are not inhibited in feedback by PCN production due to the absence of a loop region required for allosteric control reaction. This study highlighted the importance of PhzC and applying P. chlororaphis for shikimate pathway-derived high-value biological production.

1. Introduction

The shikimate pathway is one of the most studied pathways in E. coli. Glucose and other carbon sources produce phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) through the glycolytic pathway (EPP) and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), respectively. Both intermediates react to form 3-deoxy-arabino heptanoic acid-7-phosphate (DAHP) by the enzymatic action of DAHP synthase and enter the shikimate pathway to synthesize chorismate, which then further synthesizes an extensive range of valuable products through different metabolic routes [1,2]. Eight core enzymes, AroA, AroB, AroC, AroD, AroE, AroF (or isoenzymes AroG, AroH), AroL and AroK are involved in the shikimate pathway (Figure 1), and their biosynthetic mechanisms have already been explored [3,4]. It is the most common metabolic pathway for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids in plants, bacteria, and fungi. Microorganisms and plants use the shikimate pathway to synthesize aromatic amino acids and other important metabolites, including salicylic acid, folic acid, vitamin K, iron carrier, coenzyme Q and phenazine compounds [4,5,6]. Moreover, the aromatic amino acids, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), gentisate, and other intermediates of the shikimate pathway are further derivatized in various metabolic pathways, resulting in the synthesis of more metabolites [7].
PEP and E4P combine to produce DAHP through a condensation reaction catalyzed by 3-deoxy-arabino heptulose-7-phosphate synthase. The engineered strain expressing an additional copy of the dahp gene showed enhanced glycopeptide production by approximately a factor of three. Deletion of dahp resulted in significant reduction in balhimycin production. Thus, the synthesis of DAHP is a critical step in determining the yield of compounds produced by the shikimate pathway [8].
The shikimate pathway is the leading pathway for the synthesis of numerous aromatic compounds and phenazine antibiotics. The genetically engineered strains for the shikimate pathway have mainly been reported to be Escherichia coli [9], Bacillus subtilis [10], Corynebacterium glutamicum [11], Pseudomonas [7,12] and yeast [13].
The production of shikimate pathway derivatives can be enhanced by increasing precursor supply, blocking the competitive routes and relieving negative regulation. To alleviate the stress of feedback inhibition, feedback suppression mutations have been used to enhance the yield of the target compounds. Overexpression of the feedback-suppressor mutant aroGFBR in C. glutamicum has surged the potential of shikimate pathway and increased the yield of 4-HBA by 21.2-fold [14]. In addition, E. coli DAHP synthases are mainly encoded by aroF and aroG, and overexpressing their respective feedback-suppressor mutant aroGFBR, aroFFFBR nullifies the effect of feedback inhibition and significantly promotes the yield of shikimate pathway-derived compounds, such as tryptophan, muconic acid [7,15], arbutin [16], maleate [6,17], 2-pyran-4, 6-dicarboxylic acid [18], phenazine-1-carboxylate acid, etc. [19]
Various studies have focused on using E. coli to produce the shikimate pathway products and aromatic amino acids. It has been identified that Pseudomonas spp. synthesizes phenazine compounds through the shikimate pathway (Figure 1). The first systematic analysis of the core phenazine biosynthetic enzymes in Pseudomonas was presented by Floss and coworkers [20]. The sequence analysis of phenazine biosynthetic gene cluster (phz-operon) from P. fluorescens 2–79 showed that gene phzC (one of the seven core enzymes involved in phenazine biosynthesis) is not conserved in all phenazine-producing strains. The gene phzC is homologous to three isozymes aroF, aroG and aroH. As mentioned earlier, studies explored that the DAHP synthases are sensitive to feedback-inhibition, but a complete sequence analysis of gene phzC indicated that the enzyme lacks a loop region required for allosteric control function and feedback inhibition [21]. The phzC gene is essential for producing phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) and generates chorismate by converting carbon metabolites into the shikimate pathway and ensuring sufficient precursor generation [7].
The amino acid sequence analysis of proteins PhzC from P. fluorescens and P. aureofaciens and the DAHP synthases from Streptomyces coelicolor and S. rimosus revealed that these are typical type II enzymes [22]. Since the sequence of DAHP synthases from plants shows a high degree of homology with the indicated microbial DAHP synthases [23,24], plant DAHP synthases differ from bacterial DAHP synthases and are not sensitive to feedback inhibition [25]. Here, neither the sequence of protein nor the location of the gene phzC provides insights into the derivation of the phenazine nucleus [26,27].
Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) capable of producing PCN with four genes encoding DAHP synthase. This study aims to uncover the essentiality of the DAHP synthase encoding gene phzC for the shikimate pathway and biosynthesis of phenazine-1-carboxamide (PCN). Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66 has been studied for many years in our laboratory to synthesize phenazine compounds, such as PCA, PCN, 2-hydroxyphenazine, and 2,3-dihydro-3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (DHHA). These compounds were obtained through metabolic engineering and gene manipulations based on the shikimate pathway [28].
E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; DAHP, 3-deoxy-Darabino-heptulosonate7-phosphate; PCN: phenazine-1-carboxamide; 4-HBA, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid; Tyr: tyrosine; Trp: Tryptophan; Phe: Phenylalanine. Main enzymes involved: AroF, AroH, PhzC, AroG: DAHP synthase; PhzE: anthranilate synthase. The phenazine biosynthesis was marked in red, and the aromatic amino acid biosynthesis was marked in blue.
P. chlororaphis HT66 can efficiently synthesize phenazine compound PCN, the gene phzC encodes DAHP synthase and is mainly involved in condensing E4P and PEP to form DAHP in P. chlororaphis HT66 (Figure 1). To explore the function of PhzC in the biosynthesis of shikimate pathway derivatives, we explained the effect of gene phzC on PCN biosynthesis by P. chlororaphis HT66. The analysis of gene phzC function will lay the foundation for the cell factory construction in Pseudomonas based on the shikimate pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

All strains used and engineered in this study are listed in Table 1, and the oligonucleotides are summarized in Table 2. Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Tryptone 10 g, Yeast extract 5 g, NaCl 10 g, g/L) was used to incubate E. coli and P. chlororaphis during the mutant’s construction. E. coli was incubated at 37 °C, while P. chlororaphis was cultured at 28 °C. King’s medium B (KB) medium (Glycerol 18 g, Tryptone 20 g, MgSO4 0.732 g, K2HPO4 0.514 g, g/L), K medium (Glycerol 18 g, MgSO4 0.732 g, K2HPO4 0.514 g, g/L) and G medium (Tryptone 20 g, MgSO4 0.732 g, K2HPO4 0.514 g, g/L) were used for activating P. chlororaphis for fermentation. Precisely, 100 μg mL−1 of ampicillin and 50 μg mL−1 of kanamycin were added to the medium for selection.
For shake-flask fermentation, P. chlororaphis and its derivatives were activated at 28 °C overnight in agar media. A single colony was inoculated in 60 mL flasks for 12 h at 28 °C with 200 rpm shaking, and then 0.6 mL of the culture was inoculated for fermentation in 60 mL KB medium for 64 h at 28 °C with 200 rpm.

2.2. DNA Manipulation and Transformation

All plasmids used and constructed in this study are listed in Table 1. All genes were amplified with PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase (Takara Bio., Beijing, China). Plasmids containing respective genes were constructed with In-Fusion Cloning Kit (Takara Bio.) Chromosomal in-frame deletions of phzC were performed separately using the method previously reported [7].
Plasmid pBBR1-MCS2 was used to construct the phzC overexpression strain using native phenazine promoter Pphz. First, gene phzC and Pphz promoter from the genomic DNA of P. chlororaphis HT66 were amplified. Then, gene phzC and promoter Pphz fragments were simultaneously inserted into the plasmid pBBR1-MCS2 using an In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara Bio.) yielding the plasmid pBBR-Pphz-phzC. The plasmid was verified through PCR and DNA sequencing before transforming into P. chlororaphis by electroporation (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All of the primers used are shown in Table 2.

2.3. Sequence and Protein Analysis of DAHP

DNA sequences of the genes in P. chlororaphis were retrieved from the Pseudomonas Genome Database (http://www.pseudomonas.com/, accessed on 6 December 2019). Sequence homology searching was conducted using the NCBI nucleotide BLAST server. The amino acid sequences of DAHP synthase from other strains were obtained from GenBank. A phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 7.0 using the Neighbor-Joining method.
First, the SWISS-MODEL template library (SMTL version 2020-08-05, PDB release 2020-07-31) [29,30] was searched with BLAST [31] and HHBlits [32] for evolutionary related structures matching the sequence of PhzC. Then, the obtained model was prepared using AutoDock Tools (ADT) [33] and converted into pdbqt mode. Through the site finder function of Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), we predicted a binding site, which coincides the positions and reactions mechanism of the two ligands observed in previous studies [34]. Finally, we used MOE to create dummy atoms as the center of the box, and then calculated the affinity of the PhzC with PEP and EFP.

2.4. Fermentation Process of P. chlororaphis and its Derivative Strains

P. chlororaphis and its derivatives strains were activated overnight at 28 °C in KB agar media. Selection of single colonies from Petri plates was performed and used to inoculate approximately 5 mL of KB broth in 50 mL flasks. The primary cultures were incubated overnight at 28 °C at 200 rpm. Portions of these cultures were inoculated into 250 mL baffled flasks containing 60 mL KB broth to achieve an initial OD600 of 0.02. The fermentation process was initiated, and the samples were collected every 12 h to determine cell growth and PCN concentration. When genes were overexpressed in vector pBBR1-MCS2, after 6 h of cultivation, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to the culture at a final concentration of 0.1 mM. Triplicate experiments were carried out for each fermentation test.

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

P. chlororaphis and its derivatives were cultured in KB medium for 26 h, RNA preparation was performed using TaKaRa MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit. RNA stock was prepared as reported by harvesting cells [7]. Total RNA (500 ng) was immediately used in reverse transcription using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit. The qPCR reactions were performed in a 96-well plate with a 10 µL mixture containing 5 µL 2 × SYBR green® Premix DimerEraser™ (Takara), 1 µL ROX reference dye, 1 µL cDNA, and appropriate primer concentration. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. The relative expression levels were calculated based on the reported methods [35]. The rpoD gene encoding sigma factor was used as a reference. The fold change for mRNA was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method. The gene modules were identified using the methods of Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM) [total_exon_fragments/mapped reads (millions) exon length (kB)] [36]. Calculation of the copy numbers of target genes was supplied in supporting information.

2.6. Quantitative Assay for PCN Production

To extract PCN, 500 μL of fermentation culture was mixed with 25 μL of 6 M HCl, and then 3500 μL of ethyl acetate was used for extraction. PCN was separated using HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a C18 reversed-phase column (5 μm, 4.6 × 12.5 mm) eluted with acetonitrile-5 mM ammonium acetate (60:40, v/v). PCN production was quantified using peak area (A) in HPLC elute according to the following formula: PCN (mg/L) = 0.00871A − 3.6617, which was derived from a dose-peak area plot using purified PCN with a correlation coefficiency (R2) of 0.999. Dry cell weight (DCW) in KB medium was calculated from the optical density at 600 nm (1OD600 = 0.4135 g DCW L−1).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The results were averaged and presented as the mean ± standard deviation from triplicate independent experiments. Significant differences between means (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Uncovering DAHP Synthases in P. chlororaphis HT66

The initial step of the shikimate pathway is the synthesis of DAHP from the precursor’s PEP and E4P catalyzed by DAHP synthase (EC 2.5.1.54) [37]. The gene aroG sequence was used against the P. chlororaphis genome in BLAST search analysis. Interestingly, four genes encoding DAHP synthases were found in P. chlororaphis, whereas three DAHP synthase isozymes are harbored in E. coli. One DAHP synthase encoded by gene phzC was only found in Pseudomonas. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out to determine the differences between DAHP synthases based on amino acid sequence alignment in P. chlororaphis and E. coli. Figure 2 showed that two types of DAHP synthases were identified, four genes encoding DAHP synthase in P. chlororaphis HT66 genomic database are M217_RS0108615 (aroF), M217_RS0108710 (aroG), M217_RS0131975 (aroH) and M217_RS0112890 (phzC). The amino acid sequence of PhzC in P. chlororaphis HT66 is 24%, 40% and 36%, identical to the amino acid sequence of AroF, AroG and AroH of E. coli, respectively. The AroF of P. chlororaphis HT66 is homologous to AroF, AroG and AroH in E. coli with the amino acid sequence at 26%, 29% and 36%, respectively. Moreover, AroG amino acid sequence is 60%, 54% and 47% identical to the amino acid sequences of AroF, AroG and AroH in E. coli, respectively. Similarly, AroH amino acid sequence is 53%, 49% and 46% identical to AroF, AroG and AroH in E. coli, respectively. Sequence analysis of different DAHP synthases showed that DAHP synthases were classified into DAHP synthase type I and DAHP synthase type II, and PhzC from P. chlororaphis HT66 belongs to DAHP synthase type II. Comparative analysis of PhzC in phenazine producing and non-PHZ producing strains was shown in Table S1 in Supplementary File.
phzC encodes the first DAHP synthase in the shikimate pathway, aroF, aroG and aroH encode the next three DAHP synthases in P. chlororaphis, whereas only aroF, aroG and aroH are found in E. coli. Based on our earlier transcriptomic analysis, the FPKM (fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped) of four DAHP synthases were shown in Figure 3. As illustrated, the FPKM value of gene phzC was 5590 in the 2-hydroxyphenazine-accumulating strain P. chlororaphis-AN, which was significantly higher than aroF (FPKM = 107), aroG (FPKM = 52) and aroH (FPKM = 898). FPKM values are 108 times, 52 times, and 6 times of that genes aroF, aroG and aroH, respectively, and it was similar to the previous iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis [38]. Based on the transcriptomic analysis of phenazine-deficient strain P. chlororaphis-PHZ, no significant change was observed in the transcriptional levels of aroF (FPKM = 117), aroG (FPKM = 52), and aroH (FPKM = 20). Thus, phzC is hypothesized to be more essential for the biosynthesis of phenazine derivatives than aroF, aroG, and aroH in P. chlororaphis HT66.
The P. chlororaphis-AN (with strengthened phenazine synthetic pathway) and P. chlororaphis-AN-PHZ (with inactivated phenazine synthetic pathway) were used for transcriptome analysis.
For further analysis, the PCN biosynthetic pathway was blocked in P. chlororaphis HT66, resulting in phenazine-deficient strain HT66ΔphzE. After 26 h of incubation, the transcription level of different DAHP synthases was noted. Figure 3B showed that gene phzC is down-regulated by 1.4-fold, aroF and aroG are up-regulated by 1.1-fold, 2.1-fold respectively, while gene aroH is down-regulated by 2.7-fold after inactivating phenazine synthetic pathway. The transcription level is consistent with both inactivated strains of the entire phenazine synthase gene cluster (P. chlororaphis-PHZ) and phenazine biosynthetic pathway (HT66ΔphzE) (Figure 3). The transcriptional level of phzC was 29% decreased after deleting phzE gene. Thus, it was supposed that changes in the transcriptional levels of genes aroF, aroG and aroH are caused by the inactivation of phzC gene, which has a significant influence on the carbon flux of the entire shikimate pathway, and the resulting end products are responsible for the transcriptional regulation of aroF, aroG and aroH. Therefore, it was concluded that phzC is essential for PCN biosynthesis.

3.2. Mutation and Functional Characterization of DAHP Synthases

To explore the function of four different DAHP synthases in P. chlororaphis, single DAHP synthase defective strain was constructed through non-scar gene deletion [7]. The derived strains were cultured in KB medium for 72 h. As shown in Figure 4, no morphological difference was found, whereas phzC mutant strain HT66ΔphzC displayed a reduction in PCN production. The cell growth and PCN titer were checked in KB medium after 84 h of incubation to further analyze PCN production. Figure 5A showed no significant differences in the cell growth of mutant strains of genes phzC, aroF, aroG and aroH. Surprisingly, the production of PCN was dramatically decreased by the inactivation phzC gene, but the effect of aroF, aroG and aroH genes was less efficient on PCN production (Figure 5A). The production of PCN was 24.6 mg/L, 357.1 mg/L, 396.8 mg/L and 380.5 mg/L on the single deletion of phzC, aroF, aroG and aroH respectively. After 36 h of cultivation, four mutants produced 5.8%, 84.2%, 96.6%, and 89.7% of the PCN concentration compared with the wild-type strain, respectively. Consequently, the PCN production was significantly reduced by knocking out phzC. No significant titer of aromatic amino acids was detected (data not shown).
To further investigate the effect of phzC on PCN production, double DAHP synthases genes were knocked out by constructing six individual mutant strains. Both the cell growth and PCN production were assessed in KB medium, as shown in Figure 5B. Results indicated no significant difference in cell growth among all the derivatives strains. HPLC analysis showed that the PCN production was dramatically decreased to 2.3 mg/L, 37.3 mg/L and 46.9 mg/L in the mutant strain HT66ΔphzCΔaroF, HT66ΔphzCΔaroG and HT66ΔphzCΔaroH, compared to 0.54%, 8.8%, and 9.93% of the PCN produced by the wild-type strain, respectively. The inactivation of gene phzC showed that phzC is essential for PCN biosynthesis. However, the PCN production was decreased by 84%, 82.5%, and 77.1% in the double mutant strains HT66ΔaroFΔaroG, HT66ΔaroFΔaroH, HT66ΔaroGΔaroH, respectively. These results were consistent with the mutant strains with aroF, aroG and aroH knockout, which showed less significant function in PCN biosynthesis, as revealed by a single gene DAHP synthase inactivation. In the absence of phzC, PCN production was decreased by more than 90%, while the inactivation of genes aroF, aroG and aroH had a 15% or less significant effect on PCN production. In addition, the loss of phzC reduces the flow of carbon fluxes in the shikimate pathway leading to a substantial reduction in PCN production in P. chlororaphis.

3.3. Gene Expression Level and Its Quantification

To better understand the difference among the AroF, AroG, AroH and PhzC in PCN biosynthesis, the transcriptional level of DAHP synthases encoding genes was measured after culturing for 26 h. As shown in Figure 6A, the absolute transcriptional level of phzC was normalized to 8.4, higher than aroF (8.2) and aroG (7.9), lower than aroH (8.7), so no significant expression difference was found in the derived strains of P. chlororaphis HT66 (Tables S2 and S3 in Supplementary File). It reveals that gene phzC is essential for PCN biosynthesis, which is not dependent on its higher expression level. Moreover, PhzE is the first enzyme that catalyzes chorismate for phenazine derivative synthesis. We also determined the absolute transcript level of gene phzE in the wild-type strain and found that the transcription level of phzC was significantly higher than phzE (Figure 6A). It was supposed that phzC predominantly determines the efficiency of the shikimate pathway, and its high transcriptional level may be involved in the shikimate pathway productivity.
As the previous studies reported, the transcriptional level of aroF, aroG and aroH were inhibited by aromatic amino acids in E. coli. In this study, the feedback inhibition of genes phzC and phzE was studied in strain P. chlororaphis HT66. Strain P. chlororaphis HT66 was cultured in KB medium for 12 h, and PCN was added to the medium at a final concentration of 1 g/L and 2 g/L, respectively. After 26 h of culturing, the transcriptional levels of genes phzC and phzE were determined. After adding different concentrations of PCN, the transcription level of phzC was up-regulated by 1.14 times (PCN, 1 g/L) and down-regulated by 1.32 times (PCN, 2 g/L), and no significant feedback inhibition was observed (Figure 6B). Therefore, it is speculated that PhzC and PhzE in P. chlororaphis HT66 were not sensitive to feedback inhibition by PCN (pathway end-product).

3.4. Effect of DAHP Synthase Gene Complementation in the Mutant Strains

Based on the pBBR1MCS-2 plasmid and the previously screened native Pphz promoter, phzC, aroF, aroG and aroH were overexpressed and restored into the corresponding single DAHP synthase deficient strain, and the empty plasmid was expressed in the wild type strain as a control, HT66ΔphzC::phzC, HT66ΔaroF::aroF, HT66ΔaroG::aroG, HT66ΔaroH::aroH and HT66::pBBR were constructed respectively. The fermentation process was carried out in the shake flask containing KB medium, and PCN production was measured after 36 h (Figure 7). PCN production was restored to 318.2 mg/L when phzC was overexpressed in the phzC defective strain, which was 78% and 74.9% compared with HT66::pBBR and wild type strain, respectively. It is also shown that expressing an empty plasmid pBBR-MCS2 in P. chlororaphis HT66 had a slight effect on PCN production, while our previous study reported that antibiotics and inducers displayed a notable effect on the growth of P. chlororaphis [7].

3.5. Effect of DAHP Synthases on the Metabolism of Carbon and Nitrogen Sources

PhzC catalyzes the condensation reaction of PEP and E4P to produce metabolite DAHP and is essential for PCN biosynthesis in P. chlororaphis HT66. To investigate the effect of DAHP synthases on the carbon metabolism in P. chlororaphis, strains HT66ΔphzC, HT66ΔaroF, HT66ΔaroG and HT66ΔaroH were incubated in a medium (MM+glycerol) containing glycerol as the sole carbon source. Results showed no significant difference in colony morphology and the cell growth among different DAHP synthase-deficient strains (Figure 8A). It is indicated that the absence of different DAHP synthase does not affect glycerol utilization.
As shown in Figure 8B, when the strains HT66, HT66ΔphzC, HT66ΔaroF, HT66ΔaroG and HT66ΔaroH were grown in glycerol deficient medium, no significant reduction in PCN production was observed, but the absence of glycerol in the medium reduced the maximum biomass significantly (OD600 only reached 6.4). After culturing for 36 h, the concentration of PCN produced by HT66ΔphzC, HT66ΔaroF, HT66ΔaroG, and HT66ΔaroH was 9.5 mg/L, 398.5 mg/L, 350.5 mg/L and 378.7 mg/L, respectively. No significant difference for PCN production was observed in the KB medium. Moreover, P. chlororaphis HT66 could produce 399.5 mg/L of PCN without glycerol, 10% less than that harvested in KB medium. The results indicated that gene phzC displayed no effect on the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen sources. Thus, combining with our early study, it is found that P. chlororaphis HT66 utilizes tryptone as a priority nutrient and then enters glycerol metabolism.

4. Discussion

Recently, DAHP synthases were grouped into two distinct classes based on protein sequence homology. The NCBI blasting analysis of DAHP synthase encoding genes shows that, in addition to genes aroF, aroG and aroH, P. chlororaphis HT66 also harbor another gene phzC encoding DAHP synthase. In E. coli, AroG accounts for approximately 80% of the total DAHP synthase activity exhibiting a higher specific proteolytic resistance than other DAHP synthases [39,40]. However, phzC was deemed about 90% of the total DAHP synthase activity for PCN synthesis in P. chlororaphis HT66. Once phzC was inactivated, the production of PCN decreased by more than 90%, indicating that the PhzC is mainly responsible for DAHP synthase activity.
In addition, aroF, aroG and aroH have been widely studied in E. coli and are sensitive to feedback inhibition to aromatic amino acids, tyrosine, phenylalanine and tryptophan, respectively [41,42,43]. In contrast, by adding different concentrations of PCN to the culture medium, it was found that gene phzC was not sensitive to feedback inhibition to the pathway end products PCN. Moreover, no feedback inhibition was observed when feeding aromatic amino acids (data not shown). The previous studies have found that phzC in P. fluorescens 2–79 is not conserved in different phenazine producing strains. Unlike aroF, aroG and aroH, phzC lacks an allosteric control loop region and is not sensitive to metabolites feedback inhibition [21]. When using the swiss-model to perform homology modeling, as seen in Figure 9, the affinity of PhzC with PEP and E4P are −5.9 kcal/mol and −5.4 kcal/mol, respectively. The affinity of AroF with PEP and E4P are −6.6 kcal/mol and −5.7 kcal/mol, respectively. The affinity of AroG with PEP and E4P are −5.2 kcal/mol and −4.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The affinity of AroH with PEP and E4P are −6.6 kcal/mol and −5.9 kcal/mol, respectively (Figure 9).
DAHP synthase catalyzes the condensation of E4P and PEP to produce DAHP, which is a key step in determining the yield and production of shikimate pathway-based derivatives. Our study found that the loss of different DAHP synthase in P. chlororaphis HT66 did not affect the utilization of carbon sources, such as glycerol. Furthermore, chorismate is converted to ADIC by the biocatalysis of PhzE, and introduces a nitrogen atom through glutamate amino acid, similar to the anthranilate synthase [44]. The PhzF catalyzes the isomerization of DHHA by obtaining a proton from the C3 position of DHHA using a molecule of glutamic acid. In addition, PhzB promotes the formation of diimine hexahydro-phenazine-1,6-dicarboxylic acid (HHPDC) by a two-step catalytic reaction, which is catalyzed by glutamic acid and a pair of histidine/serine, respectively [45]. Amino acids play an essential role in the synthesis of phenazine compounds. When glycerol or tryptone was used as the sole carbon or nitrogen source, different DAHP synthase deficient strains utilized glycerol and tryptone actively. The loss of DAHP synthases did not affect the utilization of carbon and nitrogen sources in P. chlororaphis HT66. At the same time, only tryptone acted as the sole energy source in wild-type strain HT66 resulting in satisfactory production of PCN. In the case of P3 (Derivative strain of P. chlororaphis HT66) strain [46], glycerol is the main carbon source responsible for the high yield of PCN. The above results indicated that the carbon and nitrogen-fed fermentation could further increase the yield of the shikimate pathway compound.
It has been revealed that the dominant role of gene phzC in the biosynthesis of PCN in P. chlororaphis HT66 was not from the difference in transcription levels, but it can be assumed that phzC mainly determines the carbon flux of the shikimate pathway and its expression is not sensitive to feedback inhibition to the pathway metabolites. These results will promote the construction of the P. chlororaphis HT66 cell factory based on the derivatives of the shikimate pathway.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified and characterized DAHP synthase encoding gene phzC, which differs from the reported DAHP synthases aroF, aroG and aroH in E. coli. It was proved that PhzC is essential for PCN biosynthesis in the strain P. chlororaphis HT66. Inactivation of gene phzC resulted in the reduction of PCN yield by more than 90%, while the absence of genes aroF, aroG and aroH reduced PCN yield by less than 15%. After the complementation of gene phzC in the corresponding DAHP synthase-deficient strain, the production of PCN was significantly restored. PhzC has a significant effect on PCN biosynthesis, and its role on the carbon flux of the shikimate pathway in P. chlororaphis HT66 is more robust than that of AroF, AroG and AroH. Moreover, the results showed that the gene PhzC in P. chlororaphis HT66 is not sensitive to feedback inhibition and proved that production of high value-added compounds based on the shikimate pathway is feasible and advantageous in P. chlororaphis HT66 cell factory.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11010086/s1, Table S1: Comparative analysis of PhzC in PCN producing and Non-PCN producing strains, Table S2: The original data of relative quantification PCR, Table S3: The original data of absolutequantification PCR, Table S4: Calculation of the copy numbers of target gene.

Author Contributions

S.W. and X.Z. conceived and designed the experiments. S.W. performed experiments, analyzed the experimental data, and drafted the manuscript. D.L., M.B. and W.W. contributed to reagents and materials. X.Z. revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Scientific Research Projects (2019YFA0904300) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32070051).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

X.Z. gratefully acknowledge funding support from the the National Key Scientific Research Projects and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We are grateful to the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for their skillful technical assistance in LC-MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Herrmann, K.M.; Weaver, L.M. The Shikimate Pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1999, 50, 473–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Averesch, N.J.H.; Krömer, J.O. Metabolic Engineering of the Shikimate Pathway for Production of Aromatics and Derived Compounds—Present and Future Strain Construction Strategies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Floss, H.G. The Shikimate Pathway; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentley, R.; Haslam, E. The Shikimate Pathway—A Metabolic Tree with Many Branche. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1990, 25, 307–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ikeda, M. Towards bacterial strains overproducing L-tryptophan and other aromatics by metabolic engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 69, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Noda, S.; Shirai, T.; Oyama, S.; Kondo, A. Metabolic design of a platform Escherichia coli strain producing various chorismate derivatives. Metab. Eng. 2016, 33, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, S.; Bilal, M.; Zong, Y.; Hu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Development of a Plasmid-Free Biosynthetic Pathway for Enhanced Muconic Acid Production in Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018, 7, 1131–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thykaer, J.; Nielsen, J.; Wohlleben, W.; Weber, T.; Gutknecht, M.; Lantz, A.E.; Stegmann, E. Increased glycopeptide production after overexpression of shikimate pathway genes being part of the balhimycin biosynthetic gene cluster. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pontrelli, S.; Chiu, T.-Y.; Lan, E.I.; Chen, F.Y.-H.; Chang, P.; Liao, J.C. Escherichia coli as a host for metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2018, 50, 16–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Contesini, F.J.; de Melo, R.R.; Sato, H.H. An overview of Bacillus proteases: From production to application. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Becker, J.; Wittmann, C. Bio-based production of chemicals, materials and fuels–Corynebacterium glutamicum as versatile cell factory. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thomas, C.M.; Haines, A.S.; Kosheleva, I.A.; Boronin, A. Pseudomonas: Model Organism, Pathogen, Cell Factory; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nielsen, J. Yeast cell factories on the horizon. Science 2015, 349, 1050–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kitade, Y.; Hashimoto, R.; Suda, M.; Hiraga, K.; Inui, M. Production of 4-Hydroxybenzoic Acid by an Aerobic Growth-Arrested Bioprocess Using Metabolically Engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02587-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sun, X.; Lin, Y.; Huang, Q.; Yuan, Q.; Yan, Y. A Novel Muconic Acid Biosynthesis Approach by Shunting Tryptophan Biosynthesis via Anthranilate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4024–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Shen, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Yan, Y. High-level De novo biosynthesis of arbutin in engineered Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 2017, 42, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Noda, S.; Shirai, T.; Mori, Y.; Oyama, S.; Kondo, A. Engineering a synthetic pathway for maleate in Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Luo, Z.W.; Kim, W.J.; Lee, S.Y. Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia coli for Efficient Production of 2-Pyrone-4,6-dicarboxylic Acid from Glucose. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018, 7, 2296–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, K.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, H.; Sun, S.; Fang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; He, Y.-W. Engineering the central biosynthetic and secondary metabolic pathways of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA1201 to improve phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production. Metab. Eng. 2015, 32, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mcdonald, M.; Mavrodi, D.V.; Thomashow, L.S.; Floss, H.G. Phenazine biosynthesis in Pseudomonas fluorescens: Branchpoint from the primary shikimate biosynthetic pathway and role of phenazine-1,6-dicarboxylic acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9459–9460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Webby, C.J.; Baker, H.M.; Lott, J.S.; Baker, E.N.; Parker, E.J. The Structure of 3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate Synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveals a Common Catalytic Scaffold and Ancestry for Type I and Type II Enzymes. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 354, 927–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Walker, G.E.; Dunbar, B.; Hunter, L.S.; Nimmo, H.G.; Coggins, J.R. Evidence for a novel class of microbial 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), Streptomyces rimosus and Neurospora crassa. Microbiology 1996, 142, 1973–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Görlach, J.; Beck, A.; Henstrand, J.M.; Handa, A.K.; Herrmann, K.M.; Schmid, J.; Amrhein, N. Differential expression of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) genes encoding shikimate pathway isoenzymes. I. 3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 23, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Keith, B.; Dong, X.N.; Ausubel, F.M.; Fink, G.R. Differential induction of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana by wounding and pathogenic attack. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 8821–8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zhao, J.; Herrmann, K.M. Cloning and Sequencing of a Second cDNA Encoding 3-Deoxy-d-arabino-Heptulosonate 7-Phosphate Synthase from Solanum tuberosum L. Plant Physiol. 1992, 100, 1075–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Biessy, A.; Filion, M. Phenazines in plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp.: Biosynthesis, regulation, function and genomics. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 3905–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pierson, L.S., III; Gaffney, T.; Lam, S.; Gong, F. Molecular analysis of genes encoding phenazine biosynthesis in the biological control bacterium Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30-84. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 134, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, S.; Cui, J.; Bilal, M.; Hu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Pseudomonas spp. as cell factories (MCFs) for value-added products: From rational design to industrial applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 1232–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bienert, S.; Waterhouse, A.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Tauriello, G.; Studer, G.; Bordoli, L.; Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL Repository—New features and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D313–D319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Remmert, M.; Biegert, A.; Hauser, A.; Söding, J. HHblits: Lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat. Methods 2011, 9, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Morris, G.M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M.F.; Belew, R.K.; Goodsell, D.S.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Shumilin, I.A.; Bauerle, R.; Wu, J.; Woodard, R.W.; Kretsinger, R.H. Crystal Structure of the Reaction Complex of 3-Deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate Synthase from Thermotoga maritima Refines the Catalytic Mechanism and Indicates a New Mechanism of Allosteric Regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 341, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ayilavarapu, S.; Doctor, A.; Lee, C.-T.; Tribble, G.D.; Chiu, Y.; Weltman, R.L.; Angelov, N. Altered human alveolar bone gene expression in type 2 diabetes—A cross-sectional study. J. Periodontal Res. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Haslam, E. Shikimic Acid: Metabolism and Metabolites; Wiley: Chichester, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jin, X.-J.; Peng, H.-S.; Hu, H.-B.; Huang, X.-Q.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.-H. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential factors associated with the enhancement of phenazine-1-carboxamide production in Pseudomonas chlororaphis P3. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Jiang, P.-H.; Shi, M.; Qian, Z.-K.; Li, N.-J.; Huang, W.-D. Effect of F209S Mutation of Escherichia coli AroG on Resistance to Phenylalanine Feedback Inhibition. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2000, 32, 441–444. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin, S.; Liang, R.; Meng, X.; Ouyang, H.; Yan, H.; Wang, Y.; Jones, G.S. Construction and expression of mutagenesis strain of aroG gene from Escherichia coli K-12. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 68, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ger, Y.-M.; Chen, S.-L.; Chiang, H.-J.; Shiuan, D. A Single Ser-180 Mutation Desensitizes Feedback Inhibition of the Phenylalanine-Sensitive 3-Deoxy-D-Arabino-Heptulosonate 7-Phosphate (DAHP) Synthetase in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. 1994, 116, 986–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, J.; Hu, C.; Shen, S.; Wang, W.; Jiang, P.; Huang, W. Requirement of the N-terminus for dimer formation of phenylalanine-sensitive 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate synthase AroG of Escherichia coli. J. Basic Microbiol. 2004, 44, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Munack, S.; Roderer, K.; Ökvist, M.; Kamarauskaite, J.; Sasso, S.; van Eerde, A.; Kast, P.; Krengel, U. Remote Control by Inter-Enzyme Allostery: A Novel Paradigm for Regulation of the Shikimate Pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 1237–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Li, Q.-A.; Mavrodi, D.V.; Thomashow, L.S.; Rossle, M.; Blankenfeldt, W. Ligand Binding Induces an Ammonia Channel in 2-Amino-2-desoxyisochorismate (ADIC) Synthase PhzE. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 18213–18221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Parsons, J.F.; Calabrese, K.; Eisenstein, E.; Ladner, J.E. Structure and Mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PhzD, an Isochorismatase from the Phenazine Biosynthetic Pathway. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 5684–5693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, S.; Fu, C.; Liu, K.; Cui, J.; Hu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Engineering a Synthetic Pathway for Gentisate in Pseudomonas Chlororaphis P3. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 8, 622226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biology 11 00086 g001 550
Figure 1. The shikimate pathway and chorismate-derived pathway in P. chlororaphis HT66.
Figure 1. The shikimate pathway and chorismate-derived pathway in P. chlororaphis HT66.
Biology 11 00086 g001
Biology 11 00086 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the alignment of DAHP synthases.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the alignment of DAHP synthases.
Biology 11 00086 g002
Biology 11 00086 g003 550
Figure 3. The expression differences of different DAHP synthase enzymes by transcriptome and relative quantitative PCR analysis. (A) Based on transcriptome analysis; (B) Based on relative quantitative PCR analysis.
Figure 3. The expression differences of different DAHP synthase enzymes by transcriptome and relative quantitative PCR analysis. (A) Based on transcriptome analysis; (B) Based on relative quantitative PCR analysis.
Biology 11 00086 g003
Biology 11 00086 g004 550
Figure 4. Photographs of the different derivatives grown on KB medium. (A) 24 h; (B) 48 h.
Figure 4. Photographs of the different derivatives grown on KB medium. (A) 24 h; (B) 48 h.
Biology 11 00086 g004
Biology 11 00086 g005 550
Figure 5. Characteristics growth profile and PCN synthesis of different DAHP synthase-deficient strains. (A) Single-deletion, (B) Dual deletion. M1: HT66ΔphzCΔaroF, M2: HT66ΔphzCΔaroG, M3: HT66ΔphzCΔaroH, M4: HT66ΔaroFΔaroG, M5: HT66ΔaroFΔaroH, M6: HT66ΔaroGΔaroH. DCW (line), Concentration of PCN (column).
Figure 5. Characteristics growth profile and PCN synthesis of different DAHP synthase-deficient strains. (A) Single-deletion, (B) Dual deletion. M1: HT66ΔphzCΔaroF, M2: HT66ΔphzCΔaroG, M3: HT66ΔphzCΔaroH, M4: HT66ΔaroFΔaroG, M5: HT66ΔaroFΔaroH, M6: HT66ΔaroGΔaroH. DCW (line), Concentration of PCN (column).
Biology 11 00086 g005
Biology 11 00086 g006 550
Figure 6. Transcriptional level of different DAHP synthase genes and inhibition of PCN on phzC and phzE transcription. (A) Based on absolute quantification; (B) Based on relative quantification. Calculation of the copy numbers of target gene was shown in Table S4 in Supplementary File.
Figure 6. Transcriptional level of different DAHP synthase genes and inhibition of PCN on phzC and phzE transcription. (A) Based on absolute quantification; (B) Based on relative quantification. Calculation of the copy numbers of target gene was shown in Table S4 in Supplementary File.
Biology 11 00086 g006
Biology 11 00086 g007 550
Figure 7. The production of PCN in different DAHP synthase overexpression strains.
Figure 7. The production of PCN in different DAHP synthase overexpression strains.
Biology 11 00086 g007
Biology 11 00086 g008 550
Figure 8. Photographs of P. chlororaphis HT66 derivatives grown on specific medium. (A) KB medium without tryptone, (B) KB medium without glycerol.
Figure 8. Photographs of P. chlororaphis HT66 derivatives grown on specific medium. (A) KB medium without tryptone, (B) KB medium without glycerol.
Biology 11 00086 g008
Biology 11 00086 g009 550
Figure 9. Molecular docking of DAHP synthases in P. chlororaphis. Analysis of the binding mode of PEP and E4P with PhzC (A), AroF (B), AroG (C), AroH (D).
Figure 9. Molecular docking of DAHP synthases in P. chlororaphis. Analysis of the binding mode of PEP and E4P with PhzC (A), AroF (B), AroG (C), AroH (D).
Biology 11 00086 g009
Table
Table 1. Main strains, plasmids used and developed in this study.
Table 1. Main strains, plasmids used and developed in this study.
StrainsDescriptionSource
S17-1 (λ pir)E. coli res- pro mod+ integrated copy of RP4, mob+, used
for incorporating constructs into P. chlororaphis		Lab stock
P. chlororaphis HT66P. chlororaphis wild-type, PCN, Apr, SprLab stock
HT66ΔphzEP. chlororaphis HT66 with phzE deletedThis study
HT66ΔphzCP. chlororaphis HT66 with phzC deletedThis study
HT66ΔaroFP. chlororaphis HT66 with aroF deletedThis study
HT66ΔaroGP. chlororaphis HT66 with aroG deleted This study
HT66ΔaroHP. chlororaphis HT66 with aroH deletedThis study
HT66ΔphzCΔaroFP. chlororaphis HT66 with phzC, aroF deletedThis study
HT66ΔphzCΔaroGP. chlororaphis HT66 with phzC, aroG deletedThis study
HT66ΔphzCΔaroHP. chlororaphis HT66 with phzC, aroH deletedThis study
HT66ΔaroFΔaroGP. chlororaphis HT66 with aroF, aroG deletedThis study
HT66ΔaroHΔaroGP. chlororaphis HT66 with aroH, aroG deletedThis study
HT66ΔaroFΔaroHP. chlororaphis HT66 with aroF, aroH deletedThis study
HT66::pBBRP. chlororaphis HT66 harboring pBBRThis study
HT66::phzCP. chlororaphis HT66 harboring pBBR-Pphz-phzCThis study
HT66::aroFP. chlororaphis HT66 harboring pBBR-Pphz-aroFThis study
HT66::aroGP. chlororaphis HT66 harboring pBBR-Pphz-aroGThis study
HT66::aroHP. chlororaphis HT66 harboring pBBR-Pphz-aroHThis study
HT66ΔphzC::phzCP. chlororaphis HT66ΔphzC harboring pBBR-phzCThis study
HT66ΔaroF::aroFP. chlororaphis HT66ΔaroF harboring pBBR-aroFThis study
HT66ΔaroG::aroGP. chlororaphis HT66ΔaroG harboring pBBR-aroGThis study
HT66ΔaroH::aroHP. chlororaphis HT66ΔaroH harboring pBBR-aroHThis study
PlasmidsDescriptionSource
pk18mobsacBBroad-host-range gene replacement vector, KmrLab stock
pk18-phzEpk18mobsacB containing phzE upstream and phzE downstream, KmrThis study
pk18-phzCpk18mobsacB containing phzC upstream and phzC downstream, KmrThis study
pk18-aroFpk18mobsacB containing aroF upstream and aroF downstream, KmrThis study
pk18-aroGpk18mobsacB containing aroG upstream and aroG downstream, KmrThis study
pk18-aroHpk18mobsacB containing aroH upstream and aroH downstream, KmrThis study
pBBR-Pphz-phzCpBBR-MCS2 containing Pphz-phzC, KmrThis study
pBBR-Pphz-aroFpBBR-MCS2containing Pphz-aroF, KmrThis study
pBBR-Pphz-aroGpBBR-MCS2containing Pphz-aroG, KmrThis study
pBBR-Pphz-aroHpBBR-MCS2containing Pphz-aroH, KmrThis study
Table
Table 2. Main primers designed and used in this study.
Table 2. Main primers designed and used in this study.
PrimerSequence (5′–3′)
For Gene Deletion
phzC-1FCATGATTACGAATTCACAACTAACCGCTAGCGACACCACT
phzC-1RGATGCGATCACTCTCACGAGAGAATT
phzC-2FTGCGCTTGAACTCAGGAGTCTTTGCCTGGAGTTTGTCGCCATGACCG
phzC-2RGACTCTAGAGGATCCGGTGGAAATCAGTACCCCGACATG
aroF-1FCATGATTACGAATTCAGTTCGATGGCCTCGACGTCTTC
aroF-1RCATGGACTCGGGTGTTTTTTAAGGT
aroF-2FACCTTAAAAAACACCCGAGTCCATGACCCGTAGCGCTCGATCATCC
aroF-2RGACTCTAGAGGATCCGAAGCAAGCGGCCTATTGCCT
aroG-1FCATGATTACGAATTCACGGTTGCACACTATCAGCCTCG
aroG-1RCGTGTTACTCGTCAGGTCACGGG
aroG-2FCCCGTGACCTGACGAGTAACACGTCCCGTATCGCGGACACAAAA
aroG-2RGACTCTAGAGGATCCGGTGCCAATGGTGCCTACTATTTGA
aroH-1FCATGATTACGAATTCAAATCGCGACAGGATCAGTCCTG
aroH-1RTTCCGCCCCTGTAGGAGCAG
aroH-2FCTGCTCCTACAGGGGCGGAAATTCAAGGCTTCCTGGGCAGG
aroH-2RGACTCTAGAGGATCCCGTGGCGAGTGTGTCATAAAACCT
For Gene Overexpression
G-phzC-1FTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGAGTTTGAGCACCACTAAAGTTGAAAACAGG
G-phzC-1RGGCGGCATCCTCCTTAGTTGGG
G-phzC-2FCCCAACTAAGGAGGATGCCGCCATGGAAGACTTACTGAAACGGGTATTAAGTTG
G-phzC-2RTGGCGGCCGCTCTAGATCAAAAGGAGGCAAGGGTTGAGGAG
G-aroF-1FTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGAGTTTGAGCACCACTAAAGTTGAAAACAGG
G-aroF-1RGGCGGCATCCTCCTTAGTTGGG
G-aroF-2FCCCAACTAAGGAGGATGCCGCCATGATGAGCCAACCCTGGAGCC
G-aroF-2RTGGCGGCCGCTCTAGATCAACGCTTGACCTGTTTCAGGGTC
G-aroG-1FTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGAGTTTGAGCACCACTAAAGTTGAAAACAGG
G-aroG-1RGGCGGCATCCTCCTTAGTTGGG
G-aroG-2FCCCAACTAAGGAGGATGCCGCCATGGCTGATTTACCGATCAACGACC
G-aroG-2RTGGCGGCCGCTCTAGATCAGGTACGAACCCGTTTTGGCA
G-aroH-1FTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGAGTTTGAGCACCACTAAAGTTGAAAACAGG
G-aroH-1RGGCGGCATCCTCCTTAGTTGGG
G-aroH-2FCCCAACTAAGGAGGATGCCGCCATGAACTCGTCCGTATCCGCTCTG
G-aroH-2RTGGCGGCCGCTCTAGATCAGGCGGAAGCCGGAATGT
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Liu, D.; Bilal, M.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Uncovering the Role of PhzC as DAHP Synthase in Shikimate Pathway of Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66. Biology 2022, 11, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010086

AMA Style

Wang S, Liu D, Bilal M, Wang W, Zhang X. Uncovering the Role of PhzC as DAHP Synthase in Shikimate Pathway of Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66. Biology. 2022; 11(1):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Songwei, Dongliang Liu, Muhammad Bilal, Wei Wang, and Xuehong Zhang. 2022. "Uncovering the Role of PhzC as DAHP Synthase in Shikimate Pathway of Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66" Biology 11, no. 1: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010086

APA Style

Wang, S., Liu, D., Bilal, M., Wang, W., & Zhang, X. (2022). Uncovering the Role of PhzC as DAHP Synthase in Shikimate Pathway of Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66. Biology, 11(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop