Next Article in Journal
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Crisis: Losing Our Immunity When We Need It the Most
Previous Article in Journal
Female Mice Are Protected from Metabolic Decline Associated with Lack of Skeletal Muscle HuR
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/biology10060544
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research on the Mechanisms of Plant Enrichment and Detoxification of Cadmium

by
Gui-Li Yang
1,2,
Meng-Meng Zheng
1,
Ai-Juan Tan
1,
Yu-Ting Liu
1,
Dan Feng
1 and
Shi-Ming Lv
3,*
1
College of Life Sciences, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
3
College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2021, 10(6), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060544
Submission received: 13 April 2021 / Revised: 9 June 2021 / Accepted: 11 June 2021 / Published: 17 June 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Generally, plants undergo a series of oxidative damage and even die after being stressed by cadmium (Cd). Recently, numerous studies about hyperaccumulators that can tolerate and enrich cadmium in the environment have been reported, revealing its potential in restoration of heavy metal pollution. However, there is a lack of systemic understanding of the mechanisms of Cd accumulation and detoxification by hyperaccumulators. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to investigate how these plants absorb, transport, and distribute Cd. The role of plant roots, compartmentalization, chelation, antioxidants, stress, and osmotic adjustment in bioaccumulation of Cd are comprehensively discussed. This review contributes to further understanding the mechanisms of plant enrichment and detoxification of heavy metals.

Abstract

The heavy metal cadmium (Cd), as one of the major environmentally toxic pollutants, has serious impacts on the growth, development, and physiological functions of plants and animals, leading to deterioration of environmental quality and threats to human health. Research on how plants absorb and transport Cd, as well as its enrichment and detoxification mechanisms, is of great significance to the development of phytoremediation technologies for ecological and environmental management. This article summarises the research progress on the enrichment of heavy metal cadmium in plants in recent years, including the uptake, transport, and accumulation of Cd in plants. The role of plant roots, compartmentalisation, chelation, antioxidation, stress, and osmotic adjustment in the process of plant Cd enrichment are discussed. Finally, problems are proposed to provide a more comprehensive theoretical basis for the further application of phytoremediation technology in the field of heavy metal pollution.

1. Introduction

With the acceleration of modern industrialisation, the problem of heavy metal pollution has become increasingly prominent [1,2,3]. At present, nearly 20 million hectares of farmland in China are polluted by heavy metals such as mercury, cadmium (Cd), and lead [4]. In 2015, a soil research survey showed that 16.1% of China’s soil and 19.4% of agricultural soil were polluted by heavy metals, of which cadmium pollution (7.0%) was the most serious. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China announced in 2019 that cadmium was still the main heavy metal pollutant in the soil [5,6,7].
Cd is a toxic heavy metal that can exist in soil, water, and the atmosphere in various forms [8,9]. Cd0 in the atmosphere can become immobilised by combining with iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) oxides and can also be atmospherically deposited on rain, dust, and snow [10]. Cd in soil and water is usually in an exchangeable state (CdCl2 and other water-soluble forms), carbonate-bound state (such as CdHCO3−), organic-bound state (combined with organic matter in the environment), or residual state (such as H2SiO3) [8]. Cd in plants is mainly in an inorganic form (such as chloride), Cd-phosphate complex (such as CdHPO4), and in the form of binding with pectin and protein. These associations have been confirmed by studies of Echinodorus osiris Rataj [11], Myriophyllum aquaticum [12], and Raphanus sativus L. [13].
Cd can impair animal and plant growth and human health [14,15]. The growth of radish was significantly inhibited when grown in soil containing with 5.0 mg kg−1 (dry weight, DW) Cd [13]. The biomass, root length, plant height, and the chlorophyll of Ceratopteris pteridoides were reduced when exposed to water containing 20 μM Cd [16]. The length and dry weight of marigold were reduced when grown in soil containing 50 mg kg−1 (DW) Cd [17]. Cd from the soil is taken up by crop plants through a migration process and enters the food chain [18,19]. Cd is ingested into the human body through diet and deposited in tissues. Cd-related liver and brain toxicity has been described in humans ingesting a diet containing 1 mg kg−1 (body weight)/day or 70 mg/day Cd, respectively [14]. Cadmium can also cause damage to the liver and brain, leading to high blood pressure and even cancer [14,20,21,22,23].
As an abiotic stress factor, Cd can affect the growth and development of plants to varying degrees [14]. When Cd in the environment exceeds a certain concentration, it will stimulate oxidative stress in plants, induce lipid peroxidation, and increase the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative damage [20,24,25,26]. In addition, Cd can also cause slower plant growth, decreased chlorophyll content, yellow leaves, and slower photosynthetic rate. Therefore, the growth, development, and physiological and biochemical effects of plants are affected, and high Cd concentration can even cause plant death [16,27,28].
Different plants have different tolerances to Cd. Radish biomass was reduced in the presence of 5.0 mg kg−1 (DW) Cd treatment [13]. However, no change in the biomass of Lantana camara L. (a hyperaccumulator) has been observed when the Cd lower than 100 mg kg−1 (DW), and chlorophyll does not decrease even exposure with 200 mg kg−1 (DW) Cd [29]. Among them, hyperaccumulators can over-absorb heavy metals and transport and retain them in the shoots [30,31,32]. Plant species that contain more than 1000 μg of heavy metal per gram (DW) are called hyperaccumulators [26]. Hyperaccumulators have been reported include Echinodorus Osiris Rataj [11], Youngia japonica (L.) DC [33], Ceratopteris pteridoides [16], Lantana camara L. [29], Pterocypsela laciniata [34], Sedum alfredii [35], Microsorum pteropus [36], Taraxacum ohwianum Kitam. [37], Siegesbeckia orientalis L. [38], Thlaspi caerulescens [39], and Arabidopsis [40]. Compared with normal plants, hyperaccumulators can not only maintain normal physiological function in a high-concentration heavy metal environment but can also absorb heavy metals to enrich them [12,38]. Compared with physical and chemical methods to control Cd pollution, the bioremediation method using hyperaccumulators has the advantages of low cost and no secondary pollution [31,41,42]. The roots of plants absorb Cd from the environment and then transport it to other tissues through transporters and enrich it inside the plant, thereby limiting the toxicity of Cd to plants and reducing the pollution of Cd in the environment. Therefore, hyperaccumulators show great potential in repairing Cd pollution and have become a research hotspot in the field of heavy metal pollution.
Several published studies focused on the absorption and transport of Cd and the detoxification mechanisms in plants. Shahid et al. [8] reviewed the bioavailability, absorption, transport, and detoxification of Cd in plants in the soil. Ismael et al. [43] summarized the toxicity of Cd to plants and discussed how selenium (Se) reduces the toxic effects of Cd on plants. Riaz et al. [44] further investigated the role of Se and silicon (Si) in reducing the toxicity of Cd in plants and clarified the potential detoxification mechanism of Se and Si to plants. Li et al. [45] summarized the hyperaccumulators reported in China and their tolerance and the effect of Cd on various aspects. However, no study has comprehensively reviewed the absorption, transport, and distribution of Cd in plants or the mechanisms of enrichment and detoxification of Cd by plants.
This article reviews the studies on the uptake, transport, distribution, and enrichment mechanisms of heavy metal Cd in plants and further elucidates the mechanisms of Cd enrichment in plants to promote the advantages of hyperaccumulators in phytoremediation technology for Cd pollution.

2. Uptake, Transport, and Distribution of Cd in Plants

2.1. Pathways of Cd Uptake by Plants

The main way for Cd to enter plants is to be taken up from the soil or water through the roots of the plant, and it can also be taken up from the atmosphere through the leaves of the plant [46,47]. The uptake of Cd by the roots is mainly divided into two steps. First, Cd interacts electrostatically with plant root secretions and negatively charged carboxyl groups on the root cell wall, thereby adsorbing onto plant roots [48,49]. This step is spontaneous and rapid. Then, the Cd adsorbed by the roots passes through the plant cortex by plasma membrane transporters such as natural resistance-associated macrophage protein and is finally absorbed by the plant root cells. This step is achieved by the high mobility and water solubility of Cd. Studies have shown that, as the Cd concentration in the environment increases, the Cd content in plants also increases, but the rate of Cd transport from plant roots to shoots decreases [50]. Cd2+ in the environment is absorbed into plants through competition with metal cations such as Cu2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+. Therefore, the higher the Cd concentration in the environment, the greater its competitive advantage [51,52,53]. Cd enters the cell through active transport at low concentrations and passive transport at high Cd concentrations (Figure 1). In addition, the content of heavy metal particles in the air in polluted areas is significantly related to the content of heavy metals in plant leaves, which is speculated to be related to atmospheric deposition [54,55]. Heavy metal particles in the air can be deposited on the surface of plants by rain and dust and are directly absorbed into the plant body through the stomata of the leaf epidermis or interact with the cuticle of the epidermis to be absorbed by the plant [56,57]. Although there are two uptake pathways, root absorption is the main pathway of uptake.

2.2. Plant Transport of Cd and Involved Transporters

There are two main transport pathways of Cd in plants: the symplast and apoplast pathways. The apoplast pathway is where Cd is transported through the gap between plant cell walls and the gap between the cell wall and the plasma membrane; the symplast pathway is where Cd is transported into the cell through the transporters and then transported between the cells through the plasmodesmata (Figure 1C) [56]. Cd in the environment is actively or passively absorbed by plants, first loaded in the root xylem, and then further transported through the xylem to the plant shoots [58,59]. In plants, Cd can also be efficiently transported from senescent tissues to young tissues through the phloem to facilitate the transport and redistribution of Cd in plants [30].
Plants require the participation of transporters in the process of uptake and transport of Cd, which mainly include yellow-stripe 1-like transporter (YSL) [60,61], zinc-regulated and iron-regulated transporter-like protein (Zrt, Irt-like, ZIP) [62,63], heavy metal ATPase (HMA) [64,65], natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) [66,67], cadmium accumulation in leaf 1 (CAL1) [68,69], and ATP binding cassette transporters (ABC) [70]. Among them, the YSL protein is considered to play an important role in the process of plant transportation of Cd2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and other metal chelates, such as the chelate formed by Fe3+ and nicotianamine, and the chelate formed by Fe3+ and phytosiderophores. The YSL protein is an oligopeptide transporter involved in the transport of metal–nicotianamine complexes [60,61]. The YSL protein (YS1) of corn’s main function is to transport the Fe–phytosiderophore complex needed for corn growth into corn root epidermal cells [71,72]. If the YSL gene of maize is mutated, it will lead to the loss of part of the transport function of maize, which is manifested as leaf interveinal chlorosis, so it is named the “yellow stripe” transporter [73]. Das et al. [74] cloned the BjYSL gene from the Cd hyperaccumulator, Brassica juncea, and BjYSL6.1, which was specifically upregulated in shoots after Cd treatment, indicating that the YSL protein is involved in the transport of Cd from roots to shoots. Subsequently, Wang et al. [75] overexpressed the BjYSL7 gene in tobacco and found that the Cd content in the BjYSL7 overexpression plants was significantly higher than that of the wild type, the roots were longer, and the root hair development was better, further proving that the BjYSL protein participates in the transport of Cd to shoots. SnYSL3 was also cloned in another Cd hyperaccumulator, Solanum nigrum, and overexpressed in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The study found that SnYSL3 was expressed in the vascular tissue and epidermal cells of Arabidopsis roots and stems. SnYSL3 expression was significantly upregulated after treatment with 100 µM CdCl 2 for 24 h, and the Cd transport rate of overexpressed SnYSL3 plants was significantly higher than that of the wild type, which proved that the YSL protein is involved in the uptake and transport of Cd in plants [76]. Although many studies have shown that the YSL protein is involved in the transport of Cd, there are few studies on YSL protein as a whole. In particular, the structure of the YSL transporter is still unclear.
The ZIP family is responsible for the uptake and transport of essential and nonessential metal ions in plants and participates in the uptake and transport of a variety of divalent cations, including Cd2+ [62,77]. Most ZIP proteins have eight transmembrane domains, the amino and carboxyl ends of which are located outside the cell [62,78]. The area between the third and fourth domains is called the “variable domain”. In the variable domain, there is a histidine-rich domain that is considered to be part of the cytoplasm and is a metal ion binding site [79]. The mutants lacking this domain have Cd transport ability, and the mutants lacking part of the domain have enhanced transport activity, indicating that the histidine-rich domain is related to Cd transport activity [79]. Grotz et al. [63] cloned ZIP1, ZIP2, and ZIP3 from Arabidopsis thaliana and expressed the ZIP genes in zrt1 and zrt2 mutants (zrt1 and zrt2 mutants were inhibited in zinc uptake due to lack of high-and low-affinity zinc uptake systems), and the uptake of zinc by yeast was increased after the expression of ZIP1 and ZIP3 genes. In addition, Cd can inhibit zinc uptake mediated by ZIP1, ZIP2, and ZIP3, indicating that Cd can also be taken up from the soil by ZIP transporters and be transported to plants as a substrate of ZIP transporters. Similarly, VsRIT1 is a ZIP gene cloned from Vicia sativa. After VsRIT1 is expressed in Arabidopsis and yeast, the transport and accumulation of Cd is significantly increased, while the tolerance of Cd in yeast is reduced [80]. This is consistent with the increase in Cd accumulation after BcZIP2 expression in Brassica campestris L. ssp. Chinensis [81], which fully proves that ZIP protein is involved in the process of Cd uptake and transport.
The HMA protein, also called P1B–ATPase, belongs to the P-type ATPase gene family. The HMA transporter has eight transmembrane helices. There is a CPX/SPC motif on the sixth, larger transmembrane helix, and it is speculated that there are metal binding domains at the N-terminus and/or C-terminus [65,82,83]. According to the difference in binding specificity with the substrate, the HMA transporter can be divided into two subgroups: the Cu/Ag subgroup, and Zn/Co/Cd/Pb subgroup [50]. Rice [64], Populus tomentosa Carr. [84], Brassica juncea [85] and Arabidopsis thaliana [86], and many other hyperaccumulators contain the HMA Zn/Co/Cd/Pb subgroup. A repeating region near the C-terminus in Brassica juncea is named BjHMA4R [85]. Cloning and expressing BjHMA4R in yeast is beneficial in improving the tolerance to Cd and the accumulation of Cd, which was confirmed by the analysis of the C-terminal region of OsHMA3 transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana [86]. Arabidopsis hma4 mutants and hma2hma4 mutants were more sensitive to Cd and had significantly inhibited root growth. The hma2hma4 mutant increased Cd accumulation in the roots, and the transport of Cd from roots to shoots was 2–3% of the wild type [87], which is consistent with the result that the Athma4 mutant transport rate decreased by at least 50% [88]. In the two overexpressed HMA Arabidopsis lines modified by the 35S strong promoter, Cd accumulation in rosette leaves was three times that of the wild type. The Cd concentration in the roots and shoots of the overexpressed rice OsHMA3 strain was higher than that of the control group, and the roots showed higher Cd content at low and high Cd culture concentrations. This is consistent with the conclusion that Cd accumulation in PtoHMA5 transgenic tobacco leaves increased by 25.04% and the transport rate increased by 16.7–43.25% [84]. In addition, immunostaining studies have shown that cucumber CsHMA3 and CsHMA4 were expressed in the tonoplast and plasma membrane of cucumber root cells, respectively [89], and cucumber CsHMA3 and CsHMA4 were expressed in the vacuole membrane and plasma membrane of cucumber root cells, respectively, indicating that HMA protein exists in the root cell membrane and tonoplast membrane and plays an important role in the uptake of Cd from roots and the transport of Cd to shoots.
The NRAMP protein is a family of membrane-integral transport proteins. NRAMP1 is the first protein discovered in the NRAMP family and participates in the process of macrophage resistance to bacterial infection by transporting Fe2+ [90]. Sedum alfredii SaNRAMP6 [91] is expressed on the plasma membrane of epidermal cell protoplasts. After heterologous expression in yeast, the Cd content increased, and the same was true after transfer to Arabidopsis. This is consistent with the increase in Cd concentration in roots, stems, leaves, and whole plants after TtNRAMP6 overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana [92], and the sensitivity to Cd and the increase in Cd content after the heterologous expression of TcNRAMP3 in Thlaspi caerulescens [93]. In addition, Wu et al. [94] found that HvNRAMP5 was mainly expressed in root epidermal cells, and the expression of the root tip was higher than that of the root base. Further research by Tiwari et al. [95] showed that the root endothelial layer and pericyll cells were the main sites of rice OsNRAMP1 expression in Arabidopsis, and NcNRAMP1 has been shown to participate in the process of Cd passing through the endothelial plasma membrane [66]. The presence of NRAMP protein is beneficial to the xylem parenchyma of plant roots to load Cd and transport it to young plant parts in the phloem [30].
In the process of heavy metal uptake and transport, the participation of transporters and their importance (Table 1) has received extensive attention from scholars. Many transporters, such as YSL, ZIP, HMA, and NRAMP, that participate in the uptake and transport of Cd have been studied. However, the molecular mechanism of the specific binding of the abovementioned transporter to metal ions and the relationship between the structure and function of the transporter are still unclear. These are essential in elucidating the mechanisms of Cd uptake and transport in plants.

2.3. Distribution and Subcellular Distribution of Cd in Plants

Heavy metals such as Cd are absorbed from the environment by these transporters into plant roots and then transported to shoots, where they are distributed to various tissues of the plant. The distribution of Cd in plants varies according to plant species and varieties (Table 2). In different types of daily vegetables, the order of Cd accumulation capacity (which is termed the bioconcentration factor, corresponding to the ratio of the Cd content in vegetables and soil) is leafy vegetables (18.9%) > solanum fruits (4.9%) > legumes (2.1%) > melons (1.6%) > tubers (1.4%) [110]. The distribution of Cd in different plant tissues (Table 2) usually shows that the accumulation of Cd in the roots of plants is the largest, and the accumulation of Cd in shoots is less than that in roots, which is related to the retention of Cd by plant roots [88]. In Monashree’s research on Ceratopteris pteridoides [16], the accumulation of Cd is as follows: root (1316.34 mg kg−1, DW) > leaf (191.38 mg kg−1, DW) > stem (186.19 mg kg−1, DW). The results are similar to those for the Cd hyperaccumulator, Microsorum pteropus [111]. In another Camellia sinensis study, the accumulation of Cd was shown as stem (0.52 mg kg−1, DW) > leaves (0.12 mg kg−1, DW) > new shoots (0.06 mg kg−1, DW) [112]. Similar results appeared in soybeans [113]. In a study on tobacco [114] and Solanum nigrum [115], the content of Cd in leaves was significantly higher than in roots and stems. It is speculated that the Cd in these plants is mainly concentrated in the roots at low Cd concentrations. When the environmental Cd content increases, the uptake and distribution mode of the plant is adjusted, the Cd uptake of the whole plant increases, and Cd is enriched in the leaves. The Cd concentration in the shoots and roots of Youngia japonica (L.) DC under the treatments of 10 mg kg−1 Cd (DW) and 30 mg kg−1 (DW) Cd in soil was similar. Under 120 mg kg−1 (DW) Cd treatment in soil, the Cd concentration of the shoots reached 314.29 mg kg−1 (DW), which was significantly higher than that of roots (252.51 mg kg−1, DW) [33], which also supports this hypothesis.
Moreover, the distribution of Cd at the plant subcellular level is uneven (Table 2). In Monashree’s research, the overall Cd accumulation was as follows: cell wall (28–69%) > organelles (14–44%) > soluble fractions (6–46%). However, Cd distribution in the same subcellular tissue of different plant differs. The difference is that, under the treatments of 10 μM, 20 μM, and 40 μM Cd (hydroponics), the content of Cd in the soluble fractions of the leaves is higher than that in the organelles [16]. In Wang’s study [9], the subcellular distribution (the ratio of total Cd in different subcellular structure to the total Cd in the whole cell) of Cd in soybean roots at 23 μM and 45 μM levels was as follows: cell wall (53.4–75.5%) > soluble fraction (15.8–40.4%) > organelles (2.0–14.7%), while the shoot soluble fraction (39.3–74.8%) > cell wall (16.0–52.0%). Similar to the subcellular distribution in soybean roots, the subcellular distribution of Cd in the Cd hyperaccumulator, Solanum nigrum, was cell wall (62–66%) > soluble fraction (26–32%) > organelle (5–7%) [115]. This indicates that the root cell wall is the main subcellular location for plants to store Cd, which is achieved by the retention effect of roots, followed by Cd transported to shoots and stored in the vacuole in the form of soluble fractions. Thlaspi caerulescens [39], a Cd hyperaccumulator, can accumulate high concentrations of Cd and Zn in the leaves. Further research found that 91% of the Cd in leaves was stored in protoplasts and located in vacuoles. This may be related to the fact that Cd is stored in vacuoles of plant cells through chelation and compartmentalisation, including heavy metal ions interacting with ligands.
The distribution and subcellular distribution of Cd in plants are uneven due to differences in plant species and varieties. At present, the distribution and subcellular distribution of Cd in plants as physiological and biochemical characteristics have been widely studied by scholars, but there is no unified understanding of whether the difference in its distribution is related to the significance of enrichment and tolerance.

3. The Mechanisms of Plant Enrichment of Cd

Under Cd stress, plants show a series of physiological responses to achieve detoxification and enrichment of heavy metals (Figure 2). Current studies have shown that the main response mechanisms of plants under Cd stress are the retention effect of roots, compartmentalisation, chelation, antioxidation, stress, and osmotic adjustment [43,118]. Among them, root function, compartmentalisation, and chelation in plants are the dominant factors in the process of Cd enrichment. Other plant response mechanisms also play an important role in achieving Cd enrichment in plants, regulating physiology, and maintaining life activities.
Cd2+ enters the cell by combining with transporters such as YSL, ZIP, HMA, and NRAMP and with small molecules such as phytochelatin (PC) to form chelates, which are transported to the vacuole to achieve compartmentalisation. Cd2+ can stimulate the production of ROS, cause oxidative stress, and stimulate the plant’s antioxidant defence system. Antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT), eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS) through increased activity. Heat shock protein (HSP) induced by stress can upregulate antioxidant enzyme activity, upregulate MT expression, and remove denatured proteins. Appropriate ethylene synthesis can also regulate antioxidant activity. The increase in proline content is conducive to the elimination of ROS, and an increase in soluble protein content is conducive to maintaining cell stability and cell metabolism.

3.1. The Role of Plant Roots

Plant roots serve as the first barrier for Cd entering plants. The root secretions and the cell wall of root epidermal cells play an important role in limiting Cd uptake and Cd accumulation in the roots [58]. Root exudates can form complexes or precipitates with external Cd, thereby retaining Cd on the root epidermis [119]; organic acids in different types of root exudates also have different adsorption effects on Cd in the soil, so that Cd in the soil enters the plant roots in different chemical forms. Therefore, the bioavailability of Cd in the soil environment can be conversed by changing the root exudates [119]. Lowering the pH increases the solubility of Cd compounds in the soil and, hence, the bioavailability of Cd2+. An appropriate concentration of root exudates can promote the transfer of Cd from roots to leaves for accumulation in the leaves [119]. The root cell wall is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin, which are rich in hydroxyl, thiol, and carboxyl functional groups. These functional groups can bind to Cd2+ so that Cd can be retained in the root cell wall [117,120]. Cd in roots mainly accumulates in the cortical tissues of root tips and root hairs. Due to the existence of the Casparian strip in the endothelium, the transport of Cd to the central pillar is further prevented [121]. Wang et al. showed that Cd had the highest content in root cell walls, and the retention effect of the cell wall on Cd greatly reduced the damage of Cd to plant cells [9]. Cheng et al. [37] found that a large amount of Cd accumulated in the xylem vessel and xylem cell wall of the Northeast Dandelion root system, indicating that one of the important reasons for Taraxacum ohwianum Kitam. to tolerate Cd stress was the retention of the root cell wall to Cd. However, the abovementioned studies have not conducted in-depth studies on how plants regulate the retention of Cd in the roots and the restriction of Cd uptake. It is necessary to reveal the mechanisms by which plant roots absorb Cd and of Cd enrichment.

3.2. Compartmentalization and Chelation

After heavy metal ions enter the plant, they can be chelated or even precipitated by metallothioneins (MT), phytochelatins (PC), glutathione, oxalic acid, citric acid, and other small molecules in the plant cytoplasm and vacuoles, thus reducing their toxicity [122,123]. MT is a small protein that is rich in cysteine. It is produced in response to heavy metal ions entering the plant [124,125]. The study found that the Cd tolerance and accumulation ability of yeast enhanced after inserting rice MT1e [126], which was consistent with the results of Gu et al. [127], and Chen et al. [128]. The binding of heavy metal ions to the cysteine-rich regions may be one of the mechanisms that plants use for detoxification [129]. PC is a type of sulfhydryl polypeptide containing cysteine, glutamic acid, and glycine synthesised by plants after being stressed by heavy metals [130]. It was first extracted from Rauvolfia serpentina and identified by Grill et al. [131]. It was found that it is not the same substance as MT. In the presence of Cd2+, PC synthesised combines with Cd2+ to form a complex and is then transported by transporters or transported through vesicles to inactive organelles (mainly vacuoles) for compartmentalisation [132,133,134].
Plants transport heavy metals that enter the plant to inactive areas such as cell walls and vacuoles, retain them, and reduce the fluidity of heavy metals by isolating them. This mechanism is called compartmentalisation [40,135]. Vacuoles are the main sites for the storage of heavy metal ions in hyperaccumulators. Vacuole compartmentalisation is one of the mechanisms by which plants enrich and tolerate Cd and is also an important criterion for screening hyperaccumulators [40]. The transport mechanism of vacuole compartmentalisation is divided into two types: transport directly through the transporter on the vacuole, and transport through the vesicle in the cytoplasm and the vacuole membrane [136]. Allan et al. [137] found that Cd easily combines with amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, and other coordination groups in cell wall proteins and polysaccharides to realise the cell wall compartmentalisation of Cd. When the Cd2+ accumulation in the cell wall is higher enough, Cd is then transported to the vacuole. Cd can combine with proteins, organic acids, sugars, and other organic substances in the vacuole to form macromolecular compounds through chelation, thereby reducing the toxicity of Cd [138,139]. Wei et al. [140] found that, after the heavy metals Cd and Cu entered the Eucalyptus cells, they were transported to the soluble fractions to reduce damage to the organelles. This proves that the compartmentalisation of soluble fractions is an important mechanism for Eucalyptus to accumulate and tolerate Cd [141,142]. Tian et al. showed that the main Cd enrichment sites in Sedum alfredii were the cortex and mesophyll tissue, and most of them were located in the vacuole [143], which is consistent with the findings of Huang et al. [117] and Zhang et al. [11].

3.3. Antioxidant System

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in controlling plant growth, the abiotic stress response, system signal transmission, programmed cell death, and plant development [144]. When the content of ROS in plants increases, the accumulated ROS leads to membrane lipid peroxidation, cell membrane rupture, electrolyte leakage, and DNA loss, which affect the normal physiological and biochemical functions of cells [145]. As ROS levels increase, the antioxidant defence system in plants is activated. As an important part of the antioxidant defence system, antioxidant enzymes in plants can help eliminate ROS and reduce plant damage [26,146]. These enzymes include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Cd induces ROS production by stimulating NADPH oxidase activity, replacing essential cations at specific binding sites, and inhibiting enzyme activity [147].
Once the plant is stressed by Cd, the plant will adjust the activity of these antioxidant enzymes accordingly, but this change will vary depending on the plant species, the length of exposure to heavy metals, and the growth stage of the plant [148]. Upon exposure to low Cd concentrations in Ceratopteris pteridoides [16], the activities of SOD, CAT, and POD are upregulated and increase with the addition of Cd, which is consistent with results for Vallisneria natans [27], Solanum nigrum L. [115], perennial ryegrass [149], Lantana camara L. [29], and Calendula calypso [17]; this might be caused by the increase in antioxidant enzyme synthesis under the stimulation of ROS. However, there is a critical value of Cd concentration (70–120 mg kg−1, DW), beyond which the antioxidant enzyme activity no longer increases or even decreases, indicating that the ROS content in the plant exceeds the antioxidant enzyme scavenging ability. The rate of antioxidant enzyme synthesis will also be affected and cannot resist oxidative damage under high Cd stress [33,34,116,150]. Lian et al. [151] found that wheat seedlings exposed to Cd increased the activity of CAT and POD but decreased the activity of SOD, which may be caused by the decrease in Fe and Mn plasma concentrations that play a key role in the synthesis of SOD [152]. SOD enzyme activity in Narcissus tazeta var. chinesis roots showed an initial decline and then an upward trend with increasing Cd concentration. Low concentrations cause oxidative stress and increase with the addition of Cd. High concentrations may lead to the accumulation of ROS, thereby inducing increased SOD production [153]. Yang et al. [154] found that, under a certain concentration of Cd stress, the enzyme activities of CAT, SOD, and POD in tolerant crops, such as winter wheat and other gramineous plants, increased with increasing Cd concentration, while the enzyme activities in plants with poor tolerance, such as cucumbers, decreased. This proves that the increase in antioxidant enzyme activity is directly related to the improvement of plant tolerance. Although antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and POD can regulate their activity to eliminate ROS to protect plants within a certain concentration range, the activity of these antioxidant enzymes will still be inhibited at high Cd concentrations. These results have been confirmed in eggplant [115], and Taraxacum ohwianum Kitam. [37]. Some hyperaccumulators can still maintain high enzyme activity in the presence of high concentrations of Cd (≥100 mg kg−1, DW), such as Lantana camara L. [29], Solanum nigrum L. [115], Youngia japonica (L.) DC [33], and Pterocypsela laciniata [146]. Therefore, the activity of antioxidant enzymes is considered an important indicator of the ability of plants to tolerate Cd stress.

3.4. Stress

When plants are in an environment that subjects them to stresses such as high temperature or the presence of heavy metals, plants begin to synthesise heat shock proteins (HSPs), chitinases, and pathogen-related proteins [155,156]. HSP maintains normal cell metabolism by upregulating the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes (including antioxidant enzymes), reducing ROS accumulation, and removing denatured proteins. It can also bind to cytoplasmic phosphorylated proteins to regulate antioxidant enzyme activity, induce melatonin production, and upregulate MT expression, thereby improving the ability of cells to tolerate Cd [157,158,159], which may be related to the DNA-binding domain in the heat shock transcription factor, HsfA4a [160]. In addition to the synthesis of HSP, plants can also induce ethylene production under Cd stress. Liu et al. [161] and Schellingen et al. [162] both confirmed this, and further found that Cd transported from roots to shoots can increase the ethylene content of shoots. Cd stress can upregulate the expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ethylene synthesis precursor) synthase to induce ethylene synthesis, and further regulate the growth inhibition of plant roots by regulating XTH33 and LSU1 mediated by the transcription factor, EIN3 [163,164]. In addition, ethylene can control the SOD content by increasing the activity of SOD isoenzymes, but excessively high ethylene levels inhibit the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT and APX [165,166]. Therefore, it is possible to strengthen the antioxidant defence ability by maintaining an appropriate level of ethylene, thereby increasing the plant’s ability to enrich and tolerate cadmium.

3.5. Osmotic Adjustment

After Cd stress, plants can also increase the cell osmotic potential by changing the content of osmotic adjustment substances, including proline, soluble protein, soluble sugar, and small molecular organic acids, thereby eliminating the toxic effect of Cd on plants [167,168]. Proline is an osmotic regulator that exists in a free state, which not only protects the integrity of proteins and prevents enzyme dehydration and inactivation but also scavenges ROS free radicals [169]. Zouari et al. [170] found that the addition of exogenous proline (20 mM) to date palms increased antioxidant enzyme activity and reduced the oxidative damage caused by Cd in plants. The same result was observed in Olea europaea. L [171]. Solanum nigrum L. [115] and Parthenium hysterophorus L. [172] significantly increased the proline content under Cd stress, which proved that proline participates in osmotic regulation under Cd stress. In addition, Zhou, et al. [173] found that the soluble sugar content after Cd treatment was significantly higher than that of the control group, which was consistent with the results of Rady et al. [174]. By increasing the content of soluble protein and soluble sugar in plants, the intracellular osmotic potential can be increased, and the intracellular water content can be maintained, which is helpful in alleviating electrolyte leakage caused by oxidative stress and maintaining the normal physiological function of cells [175,176]. However, the increase in soluble protein content in soybean endosperm is accompanied by a decrease in soluble protein content and soluble sugar content in the radicle [177], which might be related to the inhibitory effect of Cd on the activities of hydrolytic enzymes, including α-amylase, β-amylase, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase [178]. This suggests that complex osmotic regulatory networks exist in plants that can regulate cell osmotic potential through a series of complex responses to Cd stress to reduce the toxic effects of Cd on plants.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

As a widespread pollutant in the environment, Cd not only affects the physiological and biochemical functions of plants but can also be ingested by the human body through the biological chain to have a serious impact on health. Cd in the environment can interact with plant root cell walls or root exudates to be adsorbed on roots, enter plant roots through active or passive absorption, be transported by symplast pathway or apoplast pathway, and transport to shoots through the xylem. Plants use root retention to restrict Cd from being transported to shoots [121]. If Cd2+ enters the cell, it combines with small proteins and peptides such as MTs and PCs to attenuate the toxicity of Cd. Cd can be compartmentalised to reduce fluidity and achieve intracellular enrichment. In this process, Cd is combined with YSL, ZIP, HMA, NRAMP, and other transporters and is finally distributed to various tissues of the plant, mainly in the cell wall of plant roots and the vacuole of shoots. As an abiotic stress factor, Cd can stimulate the antioxidant defence system of plants. In response to the oxidative damage caused by Cd, plants reduce ROS by regulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes and synthesising HSP. The synthesis of appropriate levels of ethylene can help improve the antioxidant defence capabilities. In addition, osmotic adjustment substances such as proline, soluble protein, and soluble sugar can also reduce the oxidative damage caused by Cd to plants and exert detoxification effects to further enhance the enrichment of Cd in plants.
The use of hyperaccumulators to reduce Cd pollution is a promising phytoremediation method. Many scholars have obtained important research results on the molecular mechanisms of Cd uptake, distribution, and transport, as well as the molecular mechanism of plant enrichment and tolerance to Cd. However, there are still many problems that have not been resolved, such as the significance of the difference in the distribution of Cd in plants for plants to adapt to the environment and maintain their physiological functions; the chemical, morphological changes of Cd in the process of transport and the molecular mechanism of its binding to transporters; the regulatory mechanism of compartmentalisation and chelation; the regulatory mechanism of antioxidant enzyme activity under Cd stress; and the osmotic regulatory mechanism under Cd stress. In the process of Cd absorption and transport, the structure and morphology of the transporter changes, as do the interactions between different proteins. If the above problems can be solved, research on the mechanism of Cd enrichment in plants will take a big step forward, and phytoremediation technology can be used to treat heavy metal pollution.

Author Contributions

G.-L.Y. conceived and designed the review. G.-L.Y. and M.-M.Z. wrote the review. A.-J.T., Y.-T.L., D.F. and S.-M.L. revised the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32001203 and No. 31760749), Guizhou Science and Technology Support Plan Project (No. Qian-Ke-He-Zhi-Cheng [2018] 2276), and Guizhou University Research Project for Introducing Talent (No. Gui-Da-Ren-Ji-He-Zi [2019] 60).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lin Fu for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jeong, H.; Choi, J.Y.; Lee, J.; Lim, J.; Ra, K. Heavy metal pollution by road-deposited sediments and its contribution to total suspended solids in rainfall runoff from intensive industrial areas. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 115028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weissmannová, H.D.; Mihočová, S.; Chovanec, P.; Pavlovský, J. Potential Ecological Risk and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Industrial Affected Soils by Coal Mining and Metallurgy in Ostrava, Czech Republic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Fang, T.; Yang, K.; Lu, W.; Cui, K.; Li, J.; Liang, Y.; Hou, G.; Zhao, X.; Li, H. An overview of heavy metal pollution in Chaohu Lake, China: Enrichment, distribution, speciation, and associated risk under natural and anthropogenic changes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 29585–29596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gu, J.G.; Zhou, Q.X.; Wang, X. Reused Path of Heavy Metal Pollution in Soils and its Research Advance. J. Basic Sci. Engine 2003, 02, 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhao, F.-J.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Tang, Z.; McGrath, S.P. Soil contamination in China: Current status and mitigation strategies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yuan, X.; Xue, N.; Han, Z. A meta-analysis of heavy metals pollution in farmland and urban soils in China over the past 20 years. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 101, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Duan, Q.; Huang, L.; Bi, J. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shahid, M.; Dumat, C.; Khalid, S.; Niazi, N.K.; Antunes, P.M.C. Cadmium Bioavailability, Uptake, Toxicity and Detoxification in Soil-Plant System. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 241, 73–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Deng, X.; Huang, Y.; Fang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wan, H.; Yang, C. Comparison of subcellular distribution and chemical forms of cadmium among four soybean cultivars at young seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 19584–19595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pan, H.J.; Liu, J.T.; Ma, S.H.; Zhao, S.Z.; Zhong, R.; Liu, Y.B.; Zhao, J.Z. Occurrence characteristics of cadmium in atmospheric dustfall in Baotou City. J. Inner. Mong. Agric. Univ. 2010, 31, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, C.; Zhang, P.; Mo, C.; Yang, W.; Li, Q.; Pan, L.; Lee, D.K. Cadmium uptake, chemical forms, subcellular distribution, and accumulation in Echinodorus osiris Rataj. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2013, 15, 1459–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, G.; Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, D. Cadmium tolerance and detoxification in Myriophyllum aquaticum: Physiological responses, chemical forms, and subcellular distribution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 37733–37744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xin, J.; Zhao, X.; Tan, Q.; Sun, X.; Hu, C. Comparison of cadmium absorption, translocation, subcellular distribution and chemical forms between two radish cultivars (Raphanus sativus L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Augustsson, A.; Uddh-Söderberg, T.; Filipsson, M.; Helmfrid, I.; Berglund, M.; Karlsson, H.; Hogmalm, J.; Karlsson, A.; Alriksson, S. Challenges in assessing the health risks of consuming vegetables in metal-contaminated environments. Environ. Int. 2018, 113, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Telford, J.N.; Thonney, M.; Hogue, D.E.; Stouffer, J.R.; Bache, C.A.; Gutenmann, W.H.; Lisk, D.J.; Babish, J.G.; Stoewsand, G.S. Toxicologic studies in growing sheep fed silage corn cultured on municipal sludge-amended acid subsoil. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 1982, 10, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bora, M.S.; Gogoi, N.; Sarma, K.P. Tolerance mechanism of cadmium in Ceratopteris pteridoides: Translocation and subcellular distribution. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe 2020, 197, 110599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farooq, A.; Nadeem, M.; Abbas, G.; Shabbir, A.; Khalid, M.S.; Javeed, H.M.R.; Saeed, M.F.; Akram, A.; Younis, A.; Akhtar, G. Cadmium Partitioning, Physiological and Oxidative Stress Responses in Marigold (Calendula calypso) Grown on Contaminated Soil: Implications for Phytoremediation. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 105, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jolly, Y.N.; Islam, A.; Akbar, S. Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables and possible health risk assessment. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Brams, E.; Anthony, W. Cadmium and lead through an agricultural food chain. Sci. Total Environ. 1983, 28, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paithankar, J.G.; Saini, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Sharma, A.; Chowdhuri, D.K. Heavy metal associated health hazards: An interplay of oxidative stress and signal transduction. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, C.-H.; Ma, H.-L.; Deng, Y.-Q.; Feng, J.; Jie, Y.-K.; Guo, Z.-X. Oxidative stress, cell cycle arrest, DNA damage and apoptosis in the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) induced by cadmium exposure. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Júnior, J.E.G.P.; Moraes, P.Z.; Rodriguez, M.D.; Simões, M.R.; Cibin, F.; Pinton, S.; Junior, F.B.; Peçanha, F.M.; Vassallo, D.V.; Miguel, M.; et al. Cadmium exposure activates NADPH oxidase, renin-angiotensin system and cyclooxygenase 2 pathways in arteries, inducing hypertension and vascular damage. Toxicol. Lett. 2020, 333, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Satarug, S.; Moore, M.R. Adverse health effects of chronic exposure to low-level cadmium in foodstuffs and cigarette smoke. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wan, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Li, H. Effect of selenium on the subcellular distribution of cadmium and oxidative stress induced by cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 16220–16228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, R.R.; Zhang, P.; Du, S.T. Oxidative stress-related signals and their regulation under Cd stress: A review. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 27, 981–992. [Google Scholar]
  26. Singh, S.; Eapen, S.; D’Souza, S. Cadmium accumulation and its influence on lipid peroxidation and antioxidative system in an aquatic plant, Bacopa monnieri L. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, S.; Song, Q.; Li, Q.; Zhang, H.; Luo, X.; Zheng, Z. Damage of heavy metals to Vallisneria natans (V. natans) and characterization of microbial community in biofilm. Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 225, 105515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Andresen, E.; Kappel, S.; Stärk, H.; Riegger, U.; Borovec, J.; Mattusch, J.; Heinz, A.; Schmelzer, C.; Matoušková, Š.; Dickinson, B.; et al. Cadmium toxicity investigated at the physiological and biophysical levels under environmentally relevant conditions using the aquatic model plant Ceratophyllum demersum. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 1244–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, S.; Ali, S.; Yang, R.; Tao, J.; Ren, B. A newly discovered Cd-hyperaccumulator Lantana camara L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Y.; Tian, S.; Foyer, C.H.; Hou, D.; Wang, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, T.; Ge, J.; Lu, L.; Lin, X. Efficient phloem transport significantly remobilizes cadmium from old to young organs in a hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 365, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Küpper, H.; Leitenmaier, B. Cadmium-accumulating plants. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2012, 11, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jaffre, T.; Brooks, R.R.; Lee, J.; Reeves, R.D. Sebertia acuminata: A Hyperaccumulator of Nickel from New Caledonia. Science 1976, 193, 579–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yu, B.; Peng, Y.; Xu, J.; Qin, D.; Gao, T.; Zhu, H.; Zuo, S.; Song, H.; Dong, J. Phytoremediation potential of Youngia japonica (L.) DC: A newly discovered cadmium hyperaccumulator. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 6044–6057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhong, L.; Lin, L.; Liao, M.; Wang, J.; Tang, Y.; Sun, G.; Liang, D.; Xia, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; et al. Phytoremediation potential of Pterocypsela laciniata as a cadmium hyperaccumulator. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 13311–13319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, H.; Zhao, H.; Wu, L.; Liu, A.; Zhao, F.; Xu, W. Heavy metal ATPase 3 (HMA3) confers cadmium hypertolerance on the cadmium/zinc hyperaccumulator Sedum plumbizincicola. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lan, X.-Y.; Yan, Y.-Y.; Yang, B.; Li, X.-Y.; Xu, F.-L. Subcellular distribution of cadmium in a novel potential aquatic hyperaccumulator—Microsorum pteropus. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 1020–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cheng, H.T. Research on Cd Absorption, Accumulation and Tolerance of Taraxacum ohwianum Kitam. Ph.D. Thesis, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu, X.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, Z.; Li, T.; Jia, Y.; Wang, G.; Yang, Z.; Xian, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, W. Transcriptome analysis revealed cadmium accumulation mechanisms in hyperaccumulator Siegesbeckia orientalis L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 18853–18865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ma, J.F.; Ueno, D.; Zhao, F.-J.; McGrath, S.P. Subcellular localisation of Cd and Zn in the leaves of a Cd-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Thlaspi caerulescens. Planta 2005, 220, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Küpper, H.; Lombi, E.; Zhao, F.-J.; McGrath, S.P. Cellular compartmentation of cadmium and zinc in relation to other elements in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Planta 2000, 212, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Kowalkowski, T.; Krakowska, A.; Złoch, M.; Hrynkiewicz, K.; Buszewski, B. Cadmium-affected synthesis of exopolysaccharides by rhizosphere bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, S.; Yang, B.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Fang, J. Prospect of phytoremediation combined with other approaches for remediation of heavy metal-polluted soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 16069–16085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ismael, M.A.; Elyamine, A.M.; Moussa, M.G.; Cai, M.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C. Cadmium in plants: Uptake, toxicity, and its interactions with selenium fertilizers. Metallomics 2019, 11, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Riaz, M.; Kamran, M.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Parveen, A.; Malik, Z.; Wang, X. Cadmium uptake and translocation: Selenium and silicon roles in Cd detoxification for the production of low Cd crops: A critical review. Chemosphere 2021, 273, 129690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, J.T.; Gurajala, H.K.; Wu, L.H.; Ent, A.; Qiu, R.L.; Baker, A.J.M.; Tang, Y.T.; Yang, X.E.; Shu, W.S. Hyperaccumulator Plants from China: A Synthesis of the Current State of Knowledge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11980–11994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Cutler, J.M.; Rains, D.W. Characterization of cadmium uptake by plant tissue. Plant Physiol. 1974, 54, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Harrison, R.M.; Chirgawi, M. The assessment of air and soil as contributors of some trace metals to vegetable plants. II. Translocation of atmospheric and laboratory-generated cadmium aerosols to and within vegetable plants. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 83, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hauser, L.; Tandy, S.; Schulin, R.; Nowack, B. Column extraction of heavy metals from soils using the biodegradable chelating agent EDDS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6819–6824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Meychik, N.R.; Nikolaeva, Y.I.; Yermakov, I.P. Ion-exchange properties of cell walls of Spinacia oleracea L. roots under different environmental salt conditions. Biochemistry 2006, 71, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Palusińska, M.; Barabasz, A.; Kozak, K.; Papierniak, A.; Maślińska, K.; Antosiewicz, D.M. Zn/Cd status-dependent accumulation of Zn and Cd in root parts in tobacco is accompanied by specific expression of ZIP genes. BMC Plant Boil. 2020, 20, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cataldo, D.A.; Garland, T.R.; Wildung, R.E. Cadmium uptake kinetics in intact soybean plants. Plant Physiol. 1983, 73, 844–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peng, K.J.; Luo, C.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Wang, G.P.; Li, X.D.; Shen, Z.G. Cadmium and other metal uptake by Lobelia chinensis and Solanum nigrum from contaminated soils. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 83, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hart, J.J.; Welch, R.M.; Norvell, W.A.; Kochian, L.V. Transport interactions between cadmium and zinc in roots of bread and durum wheat seedlings. Physiol. Plant 2002, 116, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. De Temmerman, L.; Ruttens, A.; Waegeneers, N. Impact of atmospheric deposition of As, Cd and Pb on their concentration in carrot and celeriac. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 166, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fernández, E.A.; Rossini, O.S. The composition and relationships between trace element levels in inhalable atmospheric particles (PM10) and in leaves of Nerium oleander L. and Lantana camara L/. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 1665–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Anda, A.; Illés, B.; Soós, G. Effect of cadmium pollution of atmospheric origin on field-grown maize in two consecutive years with diverse weather conditions. Acta Biol. Hung. 2013, 64, 476–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wu, Y.B. Research progress on foliar absorption mechanism of pollutants. Environ. Chem. 2020, 12, 3371–3383. [Google Scholar]
  58. Huang, X.; Duan, S.; Wu, Q.; Yu, M.; Shabala, S. Reducing Cadmium Accumulation in Plants: Structure-Function Relations and Tissue-Specific Operation of Transporters in the Spotlight. Plants 2020, 9, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Da Cunha, K.P.V.; Nascimento, C.W.A.D.; Pimentel, R.M.D.M.; Ferreira, C.P. Cellular localization of cadmium and structural changes in maize plants grown on a cadmium contaminated soil with and without liming. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Curie, C.; Cassin, G.; Couch, D.; Divol, F.; Higuchi, K.; Le Jean, M.; Misson, J.; Schikora, A.; Czernic, P.; Mari, S. Metal movement within the plant: Contribution of nicotianamine and yellow stripe 1-like transporters. Ann. Bot. 2008, 103, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Curie, C.; Panaviene, Z.; Loulergue, C.; Dellaporta, S.L.; Briat, J.-F.; Walker, E.L. Maize yellow stripe1 encodes a membrane protein directly involved in Fe (III) uptake. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 409, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guerinot, M.L. The ZIP family of metal transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2000, 1465, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Grotz, N.; Fox, T.; Connolly, E.; Park, W.; Guerinot, M.L.; Eide, D. Identification of a family of zinc transporter genes from Arabidopsis that respond to zinc deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7220–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Takahashi, R.; Bashir, K.; Ishimaru, Y.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. The role of heavy-metal ATPases, HMAs, in zinc and cadmium transport in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1605–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Williams, L.E.; Mills, R.F. P (1B)-ATPases—An ancient family of transition metal pumps with diverse functions in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Milner, M.J.; Mitani, U.N.; Yamaji, N.; Yokosho, K.; Craft, E.; Fei, Z.; Ebbs, S.; Clemencia, Z.M.; Ma, J.F.; Kochian, L.V. Root and shoot transcriptome analysis of two ecotypes of Noccaea caerulescens uncovers the role of NcNramp1 in Cd hyperaccumulation. Plant J. 2014, 78, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. Nramp5 is a major transporter responsible for manganese and cadmium uptake in rice. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2155–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhao, F.-J.; Huang, X. Cadmium Phytoremediation: Call Rice CAL1. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 640–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Luo, J.-S.; Huang, J.; Zeng, D.-L.; Peng, J.-S.; Zhang, G.-B.; Ma, H.-L.; Guan, Y.; Yi, H.-Y.; Fu, Y.-L.; Han, B.; et al. A defensin-like protein drives cadmium efflux and allocation in rice. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, X.D.; Zhao, K.X.; Yang, Z.M. Identification of genomic ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes and Cd-responsive ABCs in Brassica napus. Gene 2018, 664, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Schaaf, G.; Ludewig, U.; Erenoglu, B.E.; Mori, S.; Kitahara, T.; von Wirén, N. ZmYS1 functions as a proton-coupled symporter for phytosiderophore- and nicotianamine-chelated metals. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 9091–9096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Murata, Y.; Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N.; Ueno, D.; Nomoto, K.; Iwashita, T. A specific transporter for iron (III)-phytosiderophore in barley roots. Plant J. 2006, 46, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. von Wirén, N.; Mori, S.; Marschner, H.; Romheld, V. Iron Inefficiency in Maize Mutant ys1 (Zea mays L. cv Yellow-Stripe) Is Caused by a Defect in Uptake of Iron Phytosiderophores. Plant Physiol. 1994, 106, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Das, S.; Sen, M.; Saha, C.; Chakraborty, D.; Das, A.; Banerjee, M.; Seal, A. Isolation and expression analysis of partial sequences of heavy metal transporters from Brassica juncea by coupling high throughput cloning with a molecular fingerprinting technique. Planta 2011, 234, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Chai, T.-Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of a Brassica juncea yellow stripe-like gene, BjYSL7, whose overexpression increases heavy metal tolerance of tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Feng, S.; Tan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, S.; Xiang, S.; Wang, H.; Chai, T. Isolation and characterization of a novel cadmium-regulated Yellow Stripe-Like transporter (SnYSL3) in Solanum nigrum. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 36, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Palmer, C.M.; Guerinot, M.L. Facing the challenges of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Eng, B.; Guerinot, M.; Eide, D.; Saier, M. Sequence analyses and phylogenetic characterization of the ZIP family of metal ion transport proteins. J. Membr. Biol. 1998, 166, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nishida, S.; Mizuno, T.; Obata, H. Involvement of histidine-rich domain of ZIP family transporter TjZNT1 in metal ion specificity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Tang, L.; Peng, Y.; Qian, M.; Guo, Y.; Rui, H.; Zhang, F.; Hu, Z.; Chen, Y.; et al. The root iron transporter 1 governs cadmium uptake in Vicia sativa roots. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 398, 122873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Yue, X.; Wei, X.; Zou, J.; Chen, Y.; Su, N.; Cui, J. The zinc-regulated protein (ZIP) family genes and glutathione s-transferase (GST) family genes play roles in Cd resistance and accumulation of pak choi (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 183, 109571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Williams, L.E.; Pittman, J.K.; Hall, J. Emerging mechanisms for heavy metal transport in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2000, 1465, 104–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Argüello, J.M. Identification of ion-selectivity determinants in heavy-metal transport P1B-type ATPases. J. Membr. Biol. 2003, 195, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, X.; Zhi, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Xu, J. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing a P1B-ATPase gene from Populus tomentosa Carr. (PtoHMA5) demonstrate improved cadmium transport. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, J.; Liang, S.; Xiang, W.; Dai, H.; Duan, Y.; Kang, F.; Chai, T. A repeat region from the Brassica juncea HMA4 gene BjHMA4R is specifically involved in Cd (2+) binding in the cytosol under low heavy metal concentrations. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kumagai, S.; Suzuki, T.; Tezuka, K.; Satoh-Nagasawa, N.; Takahashi, H.; Sakurai, K.; Watanabe, A.; Fujimura, T.; Akagi, H. Functional analysis of the C-terminal region of the vacuolar cadmium-transporting rice OsHMA3. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Wong, C.K.E.; Cobbett, C.S. HMA P-type ATPases are the major mechanism for root-to-shoot Cd translocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cun, P.; Sarrobert, C.; Richaud, P.; Chevalier, A.; Soreau, P.; Auroy, P.; Gravot, A.; Baltz, A.; Leonhardt, N.; Vavasseur, A. Modulation of Zn/Cd P (1B2)-ATPase activities in Arabidopsis impacts differently on Zn and Cd contents in shoots and seed. Metallomics 2014, 6, 2109–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Migocka, M.; Papierniak, A.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E.; Posyniak, E.; Kosieradzka, A. Molecular and biochemical properties of two P1B2-ATPases, CsHMA3 and CsHMA4, from cucumbe. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 38, 1127–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fleming, M.; Trenor, C.C.; Su, M.A.; Foernzler, D.; Beier, D.R.; Dietrich, W.F.; Andrews, N. Microcytic anaemia mice have a mutation in Nramp2, a candidate iron transporter gene. Nat. Genet. 1997, 16, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, S.; Han, X.; Fang, J.; Lu, Z.; Qiu, W.; Liu, M.; Sang, J.; Jiang, J.; Zhuo, R. Sedum alfredii SaNramp6 Metal Transporter Contributes to Cadmium Accumulation in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Yao, Q.; Long, D.; Fan, X.; Kang, H.; Zeng, J.; Sha, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Overexpression of TtNRAMP6 enhances the accumulation of Cd in Arabidopsis. Gene 2019, 696, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wei, W.; Chai, T.; Zhang, Y.; Han, L.; Xu, J.; Guan, Z. The Thlaspi caerulescens NRAMP homologue TcNRAMP3 is capable of divalent cation transport. Mol. Biotechnol. 2009, 41, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wu, D.; Yamaji, N.; Yamane, M.; Kashino-Fujii, M.; Sato, K.; Ma, J.F. The HvNramp5 Transporter Mediates Uptake of Cadmium and Manganese, But Not Iron. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1899–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Tiwari, M.; Sharma, D.; Dwivedi, S.; Singh, M.; Tripathi, R.D.; Trivedi, P.K. Expression in Arabidopsis and cellular localization reveal involvement of rice NRAMP, OsNRAMP1, in arsenic transport and tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Spielmann, J.; Ahmadi, H.; Scheepers, M.; Weber, M.; Nitsche, S.; Carnol, M.; Bosman, B.; Kroymann, J.; Motte, P.; Clemens, S.; et al. The two copies of the zinc and cadmium ZIP6 transporter of Arabidopsis halleri have distinct effects on cadmium tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2143–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Safe, S.; Naira, V.; Karki, K. Metformin-induced anticancer activities: Recent insights. Biol. Chem. 2018, 399, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. Overexpression of OsHMA3 enhances Cd tolerance and expression of Zn transporter genes in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6013–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Liu, X.S.; Feng, S.J.; Zhang, B.Q.; Wang, M.Q.; Cao, H.W.; Rono, J.K.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z.M. OsZIP1 functions as a metal efflux transporter limiting excess zinc, copper and cadmium accumulation in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tian, S.; Liang, S.; Qiao, K.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, T. Co-expression of multiple heavy metal transporters changes the translocation, accumulation, and potential oxidative stress of Cd and Zn in rice (Oryza sativa). J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 380, 120853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Küpper, H.; Kochian, L.V. Transcriptional regulation of metal transport genes and mineral nutrition during acclimatization to cadmium and zinc in the Cd/Zn hyperaccumulator, Thlaspi caerulescens (Ganges population). New Phytol. 2010, 185, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Zhao, F.-J.; Wu, L.; Liu, A.; Xu, W. SpHMA1 is a chloroplast cadmium exporter protecting photochemical reactions in the Cd hyperaccumulator Sedum plumbizincicola. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 42, 1112–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yu, R.; Li, D.; Du, X.; Xia, S.; Liu, C.; Shi, G. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals key cadmium transport-related genes in roots of two pak choi (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis) cultivars. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wu, S.; Shi, K.; Hu, C.; Guo, J.; Tan, Q.; Sun, X. Non-invasive microelectrode cadmium flux measurements reveal the decrease of cadmium uptake by zinc supply in pakchoi root (Brassica chinensis L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 168, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wu, X.; Zhu, Z.B.; Chen, J.H.; Huang, Y.F.; Liu, Z.L.; Zou, J.W.; Chen, Y.H.; Na Su, N.; Cui, J. Transcriptome analysis revealed pivotal transporters involved in the reduction of cadmium accumulation in pak choi (Brassica chinensis L.) by exogenous hydrogen-rich water. Chemosphere 2019, 216, 684–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Banakar, R.; Alvarez, F.Á.; Abadía, J.; Capell, T.; Christou, P. The expression of heterologous Fe (III) phytosiderophore transporter HvYS1 in rice increases Fe uptake, translocation and seed loading and excludes heavy metals by selective Fe transport. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Zhang, F.; Xiao, X.; Wu, X. Physiological and molecular mechanism of cadmium (Cd) tolerance at initial growth stage in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 197, 110613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Peng, F.; Wang, C.; Zhu, J.; Zeng, J.; Kang, H.; Fan, X.; Sha, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y. Expression of TpNRAMP5, a metal transporter from Polish wheat (Triticum polonicum L.), enhances the accumulation of Cd, Co and Mn in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Planta 2018, 247, 1395–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Tang, Z.; Cai, H.; Li, J.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, F.-J. Allelic Variation of NtNramp5 Associated with Cultivar Variation in Cadmium Accumulation in Tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1583–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, Y.C.; Zhao, Z.J.; Sun, P.S. Distribution and control of heavy metals by addtives in soil-vegetable system in Chongqing. J. Agro Environ. Sci. 2003, 01, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  111. Lan, X.-Y.; He, Q.-S.; Yang, B.; Yan, Y.-Y.; Li, X.-Y.; Xu, F.-L. Influence of Cd exposure on H (+) and Cd (2+) fluxes in the leaf, stem and root of a novel aquatic hyperaccumulator—Microsorum pteropus. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lan, H.X. Effect of Pb, Cd and Their Compound Pollution on the Physilogical and Ecological Characteristics of the Tea. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan Province, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  113. Yu, Z.Y. Study on the Difference of Different Types of Soybean from Cadmium Stress. Master’s Thesis, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  114. He, Y. Studies on the Accumulation Characters and Influence Mechanism of Cadmium in Tobacco. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  115. Guo, Z. Study on Mechanisms of Physiological Response of Hyperaccumulator Plant Solanum nigrum L. to Cadmium Stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  116. Yang, L.P.; Zhu, J.; Wang, P.; Zeng, J.; Tan, R.; Yang, Y.Z.; Liu, Z.M. Effect of Cd on growth, physiological response, Cd subcellular distribution and chemical forms of Koelreuteria paniculata. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe 2018, 160, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Huang, R.-Z.; Jiang, Y.-B.; Jia, C.-H.; Jiang, S.-M.; Yan, X.-P. Subcellular distribution and chemical forms of cadmium in Morus alba L. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2018, 20, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhu, T.; Li, L.; Duan, Q.; Liu, X.; Chen, M. Progress in our understanding of plant responses to the stress of heavy metal cadmium. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1836884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chen, C.; Li, Z.; Li, S.; Deng, N.; Mei, P. Effects of root exudates on the activation and remediation of cadmium ion in contaminated soils. Environ. SCI Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 2926–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Caffall, K.H.; Mohnen, D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharide. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1879–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Brewin, L.E.; Mehra, A.; Lynch, P.T.; Farago, M.E. Mechanisms of copper tolerance by Armeria maritima in Dolfrwyong Bog, north Wales—initial studies. Environ. Geochem. Health 2003, 25, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Guo, J.; Xu, W.; Ma, M. The assembly of metals chelation by thiols and vacuolar compartmentalization conferred increased tolerance to and accumulation of cadmium and arsenic in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 199–200, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Anjum, N.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Thangavel, P.; Roychoudhury, A.; Gill, S.S.; Rodrigo, M.A.M.; Adam, V.; Fujita, M.; Kizek, R.; et al. Jacks of metal/metalloid chelation trade in plants—An overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Morris, C.A.; Nicolaus, B.; Sampson, V.; Harwood, J.L.; Kille, P. Identification and characterization of a recombinant metallothionein protein from a marine alga, Fucus vesiculosus. Biochem. J. 1999, 338, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, H.; Lv, S.; Xu, H.; Hou, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, F. H2O2 Is Involved in the Metallothionein-Mediated Rice Tolerance to Copper and Cadmium Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Rono, J.K.; Wang, L.; Wu, X.C.; Cao, H.W.; Zhao, Y.N.; Khan, I.U.; Yang, Z.M. Identification of a new function of metallothionein-like gene OsMT1e for cadmium detoxification and potential phytoremediation. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gu, C.-S.; Liu, L.-Q.; Zhao, Y.-H.; Deng, Y.-M.; Zhu, X.-D.; Huang, S.-Z. Overexpression of Iris lactea var. chinensis metallothionein llMT2a enhances cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 105, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Chen, Y.; Zhi, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Xu, J. Diversity in cadmium accumulation and resistance associated with various metallothionein genes (type III) in Phytolacca americana L. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Singh, G.; Tripathi, S.; Shanker, K.; Sharma, A. Cadmium-induced conformational changes in type 2 metallothionein of medicinal plant Coptis japonica: Insights from molecular dynamics studies of apo, partially and fully metalated forms. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2018, 37, 1520–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Vatamaniuk, O.K.; Mari, S.; Lu, Y.-P.; Rea, P.A. AtPCS1, a phytochelatin synthase from Arabidopsis: Isolation and in vitro reconstitution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7110–7115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Grill, E.; Winnacker, E.-L.; Zenk, M.H. Phytochelatins: The principal heavy-metal complexing peptides of higher plants. Science 1985, 230, 674–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Grill, E.; Löffler, S.; Winnacker, E.L.; Zenk, M.H. Phytochelatins, the heavy-metal-binding peptides of plants, are synthesized from glutathione by a specific gamma-glutamylcysteine dipeptidyl transpeptidase (phytochelatin synthase). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6838–6842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Hirschi, K.D.; Korenkov, V.D.; Wilganowski, N.L.; Wagner, G.J. Expression of arabidopsis CAX2 in tobacco. Altered metal accumulation and increased manganese tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Tong, Y.-P.; Kneer, R.; Zhu, Y.-G. Vacuolar compartmentalization: A second-generation approach to engineering plants for phytoremediation. Trend. Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Küpper, H.; Mijovilovich, A.; Meyer-Klaucke, W.; Kroneck, P.M. Tissue- and age-dependent differences in the complexation of cadmium and zinc in the cadmium/zinc hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens (Ganges ecotype) revealed by x-ray absorption spectroscopy. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Sharma, S.S.; Dietz, K.J.; Mimura, T. Vacuolar compartmentalization as indispensable component of heavy metal detoxification in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Allan, D.L.; Jarrell, W.M. Proton and copper adsorption to maize and soybean root cell walls. Plant Physiol. 1989, 89, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Ueno, D.; Yamaji, N.; Kono, I.; Huang, C.F.; Ando, T.; Yano, M.; Ma, J.F. Gene limiting cadmium accumulation in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16500–16505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Weng, B.; Xie, X.; Weiss, D.J.; Liu, J.; Lu, H.; Yan, C. Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong tolerance mechanisms to Cadmium: Subcellular distribution, chemical forms and thiol pools. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 2453–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wei, Y.Y.; Meng, M.; Huang, X.F. Tolerance Mechanisms of Cu and Cd by Eucalyptus in Mine Contaminated Soil. Genom. Appl. Biol. 2016, 35, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  141. Guan, M.Y.; Zhang, H.H.; Pan, W.; Jin, C.W.; Lin, X.Y. Sulfide alleviates cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis plants by altering the chemical form and the subcellular distribution of cadmium. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhou, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S. Cadmium transfer and detoxification mechanisms in a soil-mulberry-silkworm system: Phytoremediation potential. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 18031–18039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Tian, S.; Lu, L.; Labavitch, J.; Yang, X.; He, Z.; Hu, H.; Sarangi, R.; Newville, M.; Commisso, J.; Brown, P. Cellular sequestration of cadmium in the hyperaccumulator plant species Sedum alfredii. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1914–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. He, J.; Qin, J.; Long, L.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Li, K.; Jiang, X.; Liu, T.; Polle, A.; Liang, Z.; et al. Net cadmium flux and accumulation reveal tissue-specific oxidative stress and detoxification in Populus × canescens. Physiol. Plant. 2011, 143, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Watanabe, M.; Suzuki, T. Involvement of reactive oxygen stress in cadmium-induced cellular damage in Euglena gracilis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 131, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Cuypers, A.; Plusquin, M.; Remans, T.; Jozefczak, M.; Keunen, E.; Gielen, H.; Opdenakker, K.; Nair, A.R.; Munters, E.; Artois, T.J.; et al. Cadmium stress: An oxidative challenge. Biometals 2010, 23, 927–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jedelská, T.; Kraiczová, V. Šmotková; Berčíková, L.; Činčalová, L.; Luhová, L.; Petřivalský, M. Tomato Root Growth Inhibition by Salinity and Cadmium Is Mediated By S-Nitrosative Modifications of ROS Metabolic Enzymes Controlled by S-Nitrosoglutathione Reductase. Biomolecues 2019, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Qiu, R.L.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Y.T.; Yu, F.M.; Hu, P.J. Antioxidative response to Cd in a newly discovered cadmium hyperaccumulator, Arabis paniculata F. Chemosphere 2008, 74, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhang, C. The Physiological and Biochemical Response of Perennial Ryegrass to Cadmium Stress and the Regulation Effect of Exogenous Calcium Treatment. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenchuan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  150. Deng, G.; Li, M.; Li, H.; Yin, L.; Li, W. Exposure to cadmium causes declines in growth and photosynthesis in the endangered aquatic fern (Ceratopteris pteridoides). Aquat. Bot. 2014, 112, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lian, J.; Wu, J.; Zeb, A.; Zheng, S.; Ma, T.; Peng, F.; Tang, J.; Liu, W. Do polystyrene nanoplastics affect the toxicity of cadmium to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)? Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhang, Q.; Lu, L.M.; Dai, Q.X.; Zhu, L.X.; Zheng, H.Y. Cadmium-induced Peroxidation and Production of Sulfur-related Complex in Roots of Narcissuss tazeta var. chinesis. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 31, 585–591. [Google Scholar]
  154. Yang, J.R.; He, J.Q.; Zhang, G.X.; Mao, X.Q. The response of several enzyme activities in different tolerant crops to Cd stress. China Environ. Sci. 1996, 113, 117. [Google Scholar]
  155. Sabehat, A.; Lurie, S.; Weiss, D. Expression of small heat-shock proteins at low temperatures. A possible role in protecting against chilling injurie. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Rodríguez-Serrano, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Pazmiño, D.M.; Testillano, P.S.; Risueño, M.C.; del RiíoL, A.; Sandalio, L.M. Cellular response of pea plants to cadmium toxicity: Cross talk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Cai, S.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.-P.; Qi, Z.-Y.; Li, M.-Q.; Ahammed, G.J.; Xia, X.-J.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Reiter, R.J.; et al. HsfA1a upregulates melatonin biosynthesis to confer cadmium tolerance in tomato plant. J. Pineal Res. 2017, 62, e12387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Chen, S.; Yu, M.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Qiao, G.; Wu, L.; Han, X.; et al. SaHsfA4c From Sedum alfredii Hance Enhances Cadmium Tolerance by Regulating ROS-Scavenger Activities and Heat Shock Proteins Expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Zhao, C.; Peng, C.; Wang, P.; Fang, S.G.; Yan, L.L.; Qiu, L.H. Identification of co-chaperone Cdc37 in Penaeus monodon: Coordination with Hsp90 can reduce cadmium stress-induced lipid peroxidation. Ecotoxicol Environ. Safe 2021, 209, 111800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Shim, D.; Hwang, J.U.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Choi, Y.; An, G.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y. Orthologs of the class A4 heat shock transcription factor HsfA4a confer cadmium tolerance in wheat and rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 4031–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Liu, Y.; Tao, Q.; Li, J.; Guo, X.; Luo, J.; Jupa, R.; Liang, Y.; Li, T. Ethylene-mediated apoplastic barriers development involved in cadmium accumulation in root of hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Schellingen, K.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Vandenbussche, F.; Prinsen, E.; Remans, T.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. Cadmium-induced ethylene production and responses in Arabidopsis thaliana rely on ACS2 and ACS6 gene expression. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Kong, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, F.; Yu, Q.; Gao, S.; Zhang, M.; Tian, H.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, X.; Ding, Z. Ethylene promotes cadmium-induced root growth inhibition through EIN3 controlled XTH33 and LSU1 expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2449–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Fuhrer, J. Ethylene Biosynthesis and Cadmium Toxicity in Leaf Tissue of Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Physiol. 1982, 70, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Wang, Y.; Yuan, M.; Li, Z.; Niu, Y.; Jin, Q.; Zhu, B.; Xu, Y. Effects of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling on oxidative stress and antioxidant defense system in Nelumbo nucifera G. under cadmium exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 40156–40170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Abozeid, A.; Ying, Z.; Lin, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, Z. Ethylene Improves Root System Development under Cadmium Stress by Modulating Superoxide Anion Concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Jia, X.; Zhao, Y.H.; Liu, T.; He, Y.H. Leaf defense system of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings exposed to 3years of elevated atmospheric CO (2) and Cd-contaminated soils. SCI Total Environ. 2017, 605–606, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, B.; Yang, Y. Physiological and biochemical analysis of mechanisms underlying cadmium tolerance and accumulation in turnip. Plant Divers. 2018, 40, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Hayat, S.; Hayat, Q.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, A. Proline enhances antioxidative enzyme activity, photosynthesis and yield of Cicer arietinum L. exposed to cadmium stress. Acta Bot. Croat. 2013, 72, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Zouari, M.; Ben Ahmed, C.; Zorrig, W.; Elloumi, N.; Rabhi, M.; Delmail, D.; Ben Rouina, B.; Labrousse, P.; Ben Abdallah, F. Exogenous proline mediates alleviation of cadmium stress by promoting photosynthetic activity, water status and antioxidative enzymes activities of young date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 128, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Zouari, M.; Ben Ahmed, C.; Elloumi, N.; Bellassoued, K.; Delmail, D.; Labrousse, P.; Ben Abdallah, F.; Ben Rouina, B. Impact of proline application on cadmium accumulation, mineral nutrition and enzymatic antioxidant defense system of Olea europaea L. cv Chemlali exposed to cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 128, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ali, N.; Hadi, F. Phytoremediation of cadmium improved with the high production of endogenous phenolics and free proline contents in Parthenium hysterophorus plant treated exogenously with plant growth regulator and chelating agent. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 13305–13318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zhou, J.; Cheng, K.; Huang, G.; Chen, G.; Zhou, S.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Duan, H.; Fan, H. Effects of exogenous 3-indoleacetic acid and cadmium stress on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Cinnamomum camphora. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 191, 109998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Rady, M.M.; Hemida, K.A. Modulation of cadmium toxicity and enhancing cadmium-tolerance in wheat seedlings by exogenous application of polyamines. Ecotoxicol Environ. Safe 2015, 119, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahanger, M.A.; Wijaya, L.; Alam, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Ahmad, P. Selenium mitigates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants by modulating chlorophyll fluorescence, osmolyte accumulation, and antioxidant system. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Jiang, H.P.; Gao, B.B.; Li, W.H.; Zhu, M.; Zheng, C.F.; Zheng, Q.S.; Wang, C.H. Physiological and biochemical responses of Ulva prolifera and Ulva linza to cadmium stress. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 289537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Amri, B.; Khamassi, K.; Ali, M.B.; Jaime, A.; Teixeira, S.; Leila, B.B.K. Effects of gibberellic acid on the process of organic reserve mobilization in barley grains germinated in the presence of cadmium and molybdenum. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 106, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mihoub, A.; Chaoui, A.; El, F.E. Biochemical changes associated with cadmium and copper stress in germinating pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.). C R Biol. 2005, 328, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biology 10 00544 g001 550
Figure 1. The root uptake of cadmium in plants. Cd (yellow) in the environment can enter plants through plant roots (A); when the concentration of Cd is low, ATP is consumed for active transport, and when the concentration is high, it directly enters cells for passive absorption (B); Cd is transported between cells by the apoplast and symplast pathways (C).
Figure 1. The root uptake of cadmium in plants. Cd (yellow) in the environment can enter plants through plant roots (A); when the concentration of Cd is low, ATP is consumed for active transport, and when the concentration is high, it directly enters cells for passive absorption (B); Cd is transported between cells by the apoplast and symplast pathways (C).
Biology 10 00544 g001
Biology 10 00544 g002 550
Figure 2. The mechanisms of compartmentalization, chelation, antioxidation, stress, and osmotic adjustment in plants. PC: phytochelatin; MT: metallothionein; HSP: heat shock protein; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SOD: superoxide dismutase; POD: peroxidase; CAT: catalase; YSL: yellow-stripe 1-like transporter; ZIP: zinc-regulated and iron-regulated transporter-like protein; HMA: heavy metal ATPase; NRAMP: natural resistance-associated macrophage protein.
Figure 2. The mechanisms of compartmentalization, chelation, antioxidation, stress, and osmotic adjustment in plants. PC: phytochelatin; MT: metallothionein; HSP: heat shock protein; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SOD: superoxide dismutase; POD: peroxidase; CAT: catalase; YSL: yellow-stripe 1-like transporter; ZIP: zinc-regulated and iron-regulated transporter-like protein; HMA: heavy metal ATPase; NRAMP: natural resistance-associated macrophage protein.
Biology 10 00544 g002
Table
Table 1. Statistics of transporters in different plants.
Table 1. Statistics of transporters in different plants.
SpeciesTransporterMetal IonsRefs
Brassica junceaBjYSLs BjNRAMPsCd2+ [74]
BjYSL7Fe2+, Cd2+, Ni2+ [75]
BjHMA4Cd2+ [85]
ArabidopsisAtHMA4Zn2+, Cd2+ [88]
HMA2, HMA4Cd2+ [88]
ZIP1, ZIP2, ZIP3, ZIP4Zn2+ [63]
Arabidopsis halleriAhZIP6Zn2+, Cd2+ [96]
Oryza sativa L. OsHMA1, OsHMA 2, OsHMA3Zn2+, Cd2+ [64,86,97,98]
OsNRAMP1, OsNRAMP5Cd2+, As3+, Mn2+ [63,95,97]
OsZIP1, OsZIP3Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+ [99,100]
Thlaspi caerulescensTcNRAMP3Fe3+, Cd2+ [93]
ZNT1, ZNT5 ZIPZn2+, Cd2+ [101]
Sedum alfrediiSaNRAMP6Cd2+ [91]
Sedum plumbizincicolaSpHMA1, SpHMA3Cd2+ [35,102]
Brassica campestris ssp. chinensisHMA2, HMA4, BcGSTUCd2+ [81,103]
BcNRAMP5Cd2+ [104]
BcIRT1, BcZIP2Cd2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Fe2+ [105]
Hordeum vulgareHvNRAMP5Mn2+, Cd2+ [94]
HvYS1Fe3+ [106]
cucumberCsHMA3, CsHMA4Pb2+, Zn2+, Cd2+ [89]
Solanum nigrumSnYSL3Fe2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+ [76]
Populus tomentosa Carr.PtoHMA5Cd2+ [84]
Brassica napus L. BnaHMA4cCd2+ [107]
Vicia sativaVsRIT1Cd2+, Fe(EDTA-Fe), Zn2+ [80]
Triticum turgidum L. ssp. turgidumTtNRAMP6Cd2+ [92]
Triticum polonicum L. TpNRAMP5Cd2+, Co2+, Mn2+ [108]
Nicotiana tabacumNtZIP1Cd2+, Zn2+ [50]
NtNRAMP5Mn2+, Cd2+ [109]
Refs: references.
Table
Table 2. Distribution and subcellular distribution of cadmium in different plants.
Table 2. Distribution and subcellular distribution of cadmium in different plants.
PlantDistribution (mg kg−1, DW)SD (%)BCFTFRefs
RootLeafStemShootCWOESF
Ceratopteris pteridoides1316.34191.38186.19 28–6914–446–4627.99–570.750.10–0.14 [16]
Lantana camara L. 293.4423.06392.37301.78 1.32–3.141.04–1.41 [29]
Myriophyllum aquaticum 122.530111.828 24.92–38.570.97–12.0457.40–66.25 [12]
Calendula calypso165 78 2.7–4.140.46–0.50 [17]
Koelreuteria paniculata8.484.042.31 45–772–1120–450.052–0.3180.464–0.705 [116]
Echinodorus Osiris Rataj2742.95 502.978.44–25.62−22.0769.49–88.39>10.18 [11]
Raphanus sativus L. 3.52–4.94 4.66–6.86 18–49 15–2036–511.64–2.361.32–1.38 [13]
Morus alba L. 31.68.5715 31–773–1316–660.10–0.350.12–0.27 [117]
SD: subcellular distribution; BCF: bioconcentration factor; TF: transport factor; CW: cell wall; OE: organelle; SF: soluble fraction; Refs: references.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, G.-L.; Zheng, M.-M.; Tan, A.-J.; Liu, Y.-T.; Feng, D.; Lv, S.-M. Research on the Mechanisms of Plant Enrichment and Detoxification of Cadmium. Biology 2021, 10, 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060544

AMA Style

Yang G-L, Zheng M-M, Tan A-J, Liu Y-T, Feng D, Lv S-M. Research on the Mechanisms of Plant Enrichment and Detoxification of Cadmium. Biology. 2021; 10(6):544. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Gui-Li, Meng-Meng Zheng, Ai-Juan Tan, Yu-Ting Liu, Dan Feng, and Shi-Ming Lv. 2021. "Research on the Mechanisms of Plant Enrichment and Detoxification of Cadmium" Biology 10, no. 6: 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060544

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop