Next Article in Journal
Ancient Immunity. Phylogenetic Emergence of Recognition-Defense Mechanisms
Previous Article in Journal
Blastocystis sp. Carriage and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Is the Association Already Established?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/biology10040341
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity in Diospyros Germplasm in the Western Caucasus Based on SSR and ISSR Polymorphism

by
Lidia S. Samarina
1,*,
Valentina I. Malyarovskaya
1,
Stefanie Reim
2,
Natalia G. Koninskaya
1,
Alexandra O. Matskiv
1,
Gregory A. Tsaturyan
1,
Ruslan S. Rakhmangulov
1,
Ruset M. Shkhalakhova
1,
Ekaterina S. Shurkina
1,
Raisa V. Kulyan
1,
Zuhra M. Omarova
1,
Magomed D. Omarov
1 and
Alexey V. Ryndin
1
1
Federal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 354002 Sochi, Russia
2
Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, 01326 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2021, 10(4), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040341
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 8 April 2021 / Accepted: 15 April 2021 / Published: 19 April 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Persimmon is an edible fruit consisting of several species in the genus Diospyros. The most widely cultivated and most commercially important species is the Oriental persimmon, Diospyros kaki. However, the inter- and intra-specific genetic diversity of the genus Diospyros remains largely unclear and is of great interest both for conservation and breeding purposes. This study describes the genetic diversity and genetic admixture of Diospyros germplasm in the Western Caucasus. The information can be used to support conservation measures and the breeding of persimmon.

Abstract

Persimmon germplasm in the Western Caucasus represent one of the most northerly collections. In our study, 51 commercial cultivars of D. kaki, 3 accessions of D. virginiana and 57 D. lotus accessions from six geographically distant populations were investigated using 19 microsatellite and 10 inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. After STRUCTURE analysis, the single accessions of Diospyros were allocated to three genetic clusters. Genetic admixtures in the important genotypes of D. kaki were revealed, whereas D. lotus accessions showed no admixture with other genetic clusters. The correspondence of genetic data and phenotypical traits was estimated in the D. kaki collection. The most frost tolerant genotypes of the collection, such as “Mountain Rogers”, “Nikitskaya Bordovaya”, “Rossiyanka”, “MVG Omarova”, “Meader”, “Costata”, “BBG”, and “Jiro”, showed a high percentage of genetic admixtures and were grouped close to D. virginiana. Some of these genotypes are known to be interspecific hybrids with D. virginiana. A low level of genetic diversity between the distant D. lotus populations was revealed and it can be speculated that D. lotus was introduced to the Western Caucasus from a single germplasm source. These results are an important basis for the implementation of conservation measures, developing breeding strategies, and improving breeding efficiency.

1. Introduction

The genus persimmon Diospyros (Ebenaceae) comprises more than 400 evergreen and deciduous tree species that are distributed worldwide [1]. Among these species. Diospyros kaki is an important fruit crop and its worldwide production was 5.2 M tonnes with 1.0 Mha of area harvested in 2014, which means five times more production and six times more cultivated area than 30 years ago [2]. Diospyros lotus L., also called date plum persimmon, is another important species native to the Balkans, Caucasia to China and Japan [3], and it has been used as rootstock for D. kaki as well as for food and medicine [4,5]. The wild species D. virginiana (American persimmon) is native to the USA and usually used as timber wood. This species is important as a genetic resource and is usually crossed with D. kaki in breeding programs aimed at cold tolerance and early harvesting [6,7].
Germplasm collections outside of the main production countries (for example, in the Western Caucasus) could be a source of genetic diversity to support crop improvement and botanical research. Such border growing regions can be useful for the search of new genetic resources to widen the genetic base for the breeding of highly resistant genotypes, which can be more adaptable to changing environmental conditions. Local genotypes offer a broad range of adaptability to different agro-climatic conditions and therefore are an important resource for breeding purposes. Thus, the valuable genetic resources of the local genotypes should be conserved for their proper utilization. In order to achieve this, it is imperative to assess the genetic variability that exists among local genotypes [5]. Another prerequisite is the disclosure of the genetic background of existing cultivars and wild forms within the germplasm collection, which allows a directed breeding process. Therefore, the accumulation of genetic information for revealing the genetic diversity and genetic integrity of Diospyros plants is in urgent need [8,9].
The Western Caucasus is one of the most northerly persimmons growing areas in the world. Persimmon was first introduced in the South-West Caucasus between 1880 and 1890. The set of cultivars from Italy and Japan was introduced and propagated first in Georgia [10]. From Georgia, persimmon spread to nearby experimental stations where breeding efforts had started and about 100 local landraces were derived. Nowadays, three species are grown in these regions: D. lotus (2n = 2x = 30), D. virginiana (2n = 6x = 90) and D. kaki (2n = 6x = 90; 2n = 9x = 135). D. lotus and D. virginiana are the most cold-tolerant species in the genus Diospyros and are important for the development of new drought or cold-tolerant varieties [11]. The standard assortment for this region included famous cultivars such as “Hachiya”, “Hiyakume”, and “Zenjimaru”. The crop commercially spread across nearby Caucasus in the following regions: Krasnodar region, Dagestan Republic, Georgia Republic, Abkhazia Republic, South-West Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, and Crimea. Dozens of locally adapted cultivars were developed over the 100-year history of the conventional persimmon breeding in the Western Caucasus. Now, the local collection includes a set of frost tolerant hybrids and cultivars of persimmon, with some surviving extreme temperatures up to −20 °C with good yields [8]. However, the intraspecific genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of these germplasm collections still have not been evaluated.
In Diospyros, molecular markers have been developed in recent years for the efficient characterization and further utilization of germplasm resources. Phylogenetic relationships of Diospyros species are mainly studied based on random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [11], simple sequence repeats (SSRs) [12,13,14,15,16], internal transcribed spacer (ITS) [17], sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) [14,18], inter-retrotransposon-amplified polymorphism (IRAP) [19], start codon-targeted (SCoT) [19,20,21] or organelle sequences (orgDNA) [22].
Among the different marker types, co-dominant nuclear microsatellite markers (SSRs) have desirable advantages for assessing the genetic features of species at individual and population levels, such as locus specificity, high reproducibility, high polymorphism, and technical simplicity [23,24]. However, the genetic diversity can be underestimated due to homoplasy, as reported elsewhere [25,26]. The combination of several marker types can be helpful for the better understanding of phylogenetic relationships in the collections.
Inter simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) are another efficient marker type that is multilocus, reproducible and highly polymorphic for genetic diversity studies [27]. ISSRs are believed to be present mostly in the non-coding regions of chromosomes and specific stretches of DNA sequences which are not active [28]. Although ISSRs are dominant molecular markers, several informative sequences could be generated using specific ISSR primers, with larger anchorage regions for SSR loci. High repeatability could be observed for ISSR primers with sufficient specificity [29,30]. The high occurrence of ISSRs between normal coding genes and their presence in certain chromosomes as satellite bodies make ISSRs unique and advantageous to be used for DNA fingerprinting. However, no efficient ISSRs have been reported for Diospyros genotyping to date. The current study presents for the first time the successful usage of ISSR markers for the genetic analysis of Diospyros. Thus, ISSR markers can be useful to evaluate genetic diversity within cultivated and naturalized populations of Diospyros germplasm.
The aim of our work was to evaluate the genetic diversity, genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships in Diospyros collection in the Western Caucasus using SSR and ISSR markers. The obtained results are an important basis for the implementation of conservation measures, developing breeding strategies, and improving the breeding efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and DNA Extraction

The persimmon core collection of the SSC RAS (Sochi, Russia) containing 51 accessions of D. kaki, 3 accessions of D. virginiana, and 57 accessions of D. lotus from 7 geographically distant populations was investigated in this study (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S1). Phenotypical evaluation of the core collection was made in the period from 1990–2020 in field conditions (Figure 1—red flags). Five trees of each cultivar were evaluated during the years, and summary data are presented in the table as binary data indicating the presence (1) or absence (0) of each trait (Supplementary Table S2). Young and healthy leaves of each accession were collected in 2 mL tubes and dried using silica gel. The leaf material was stored at 4 °C until DNA isolation. The dried leaf material was ground and DNA extraction was performed using the CTAB protocol [31]. DNA quality was checked by agarose-gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometrically and all samples were diluted to 20 ng/µL and stored at −20 °C.

2.2. Genetic Analysis

For the SSR analysis, 19 nuclear microsatellite (SSR) primer pairs, developed for Diospyros [15,16], were tested (Supplementary Table S3) Additionally, the transferability of 10 ISSR primers developed for the other species [32,33] was evaluated to study polymorphisms in ISSR genome regions in Diospyros (Supplementary Table S4).
PCR for SSR analysis was performed in the 20 μL PCR reaction mixture volume containing 10 μL 2 × HS-TaqPCR reaction buffer (Biolabmix, Russia, biolabmix.ru ), 0.2 μL of each primer (10 µM), 1 μL of DNA (20 ng µL−1) and nuclease free water for PCR. Two-step amplification program was used: primary denaturation 5 min at 95 °C, annealing 40 cycles of 15 sec at 50–60 °C and the final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min. The separation of SSR-fragments was performed on a QIAxcel Advanced system (Qiagen, Montgomery County, MD, USA) with the High Resolution kit according to manufacturer instructions.
PCR for the ISSR amplification was performed in the 20 μL PCR reaction mixture volume consisting of 10 μL 2 × HS-TaqPCR reaction buffer including Hot Start Taq-Polymerase (Biolabmix, NO, Russia), 0.3 μL of primer (10 µM), 1 μL of DNA (20 ng µL−1) and DEPC-treated water. Amplification was carried out in the MiniAmp thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with the following program: primary denaturation 5 min at 95 °C, annealing 40 cycles of 20 sec at 53 °C with elongations at 72 °C for 1 min 45 sec and the final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min. The separation of ISSR fragments was performed on a 2% agarose gel for 2.5 h at 90 V in 1 × Tris-Acetate buffer. The data were recorded as 1/0 matrix for the presence and absence of amplified fragments, respectively.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Genetic diversity parameters were calculated for each SSR and ISSR locus using the software program GeneAlex ver. 6.5: mean number of alleles by locus (Na) and effective number of alleles (Ne), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), Shannon’s Information Index (I) and for each ISSR the diversity (h). Furthermore, the genetic parameters were calculated separately for each genetic cluster.
The analysis function “Matches” in GeneAlex ver. 6.5 [34,35] was used to identify genotypes with identical allelic patterns within the SSR and ISSR datasets. Subsequently, the model-based clustering method was applied for all genotypes to verify the assignment using the software STRUCTURE ver. 2.3.4. [36]. The run parameters were 50,000 burn-in periods and 50,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo repetitions using the admixture model. The software program STRUCTURE HARVESTER [37] was used for detecting the most likely value for K based on Evanno’s ΔK method [38]. To examine the genetic structure of the collection, a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed based on the distance matrix data set in GeneAlex ver. 6.5 with 1000 random permutations. An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed using SSR and ISSR marker data. The software DARWIN 6.0 [39] was also used for Neighbor Joining analysis of phenotypical distances in the core persimmon collection.

3. Results

3.1. Efficiency and Resolving Power of SSR and ISSR Markers

Eight out of 19 SSR markers showed clear polymorphisms within the Diospyros germplasm. These markers were selected for the further analysis of the whole collection (ssrdk01, ssrdk03, ssrdk06, ssrdk09, ssrdk10, ssrdk14, ssrdk26, ssrdk30).
In the D. kaki core collection, an average number of different alleles of Na = 8.9 per locus was identified in eight polymorphic loci, ranging from Na = 4 for ssrdk1 to Na = 16 for ssrdk26 (Table 1). The average effective number of alleles was Ne = 4.6. The highest number of effective alleles was calculated for ssrdk26 with Ne = 8.5 and the lowest number of effective alleles with Ne = 2.3 for ssrdk06. The mean observed heterozygosity was Ho = 0.6, with the lowest value for ssrdk06 (Ho = 0.3) and the highest value for ssrdk09 (Ho = 0.9).
Among D. lotus accessions, only three of 19 SSR markers detected clear polymorphism (ssrdk14, ssrdk26, ssrdk30). An average number of different alleles of Na = 2.2 per locus was identified in eight polymorphic loci, ranging from Na = 1 for ssrdk01, 03, 06, 09, 10 to Na = 5 for ssrdk14 (Table 1). The highest number of effective alleles was calculated for ssrdk14 with Ne = 2.4. The mean observed heterozygosity was Ho = 0.2, with the highest value for ssrdk14 (Ho = 0.8).
Of 10 ISSR primers, five ISSRs showed reproducible results with clear polymorphisms and resolution within the D. kaki and D. lotus genotypes (ISSR13, ISSR15, ISSR814.1; ISSR815, ISSR880) (Figure S1). Other ISSRs showed a low amplification quality and were removed from the analysis. A total of 72 bands were detected with five ISSRs resulting in 94.44% of polymorphic fragments for D. kaki and 33.33% of polymorphic fragments for D. lotus. The number of bands among the five ISSR markers ranged from Na = 8 to 17 (Table 2). The average effective number of alleles was Ne = 1.5 for D. kaki and Ne = 1.1 for D. lotus. In the D. kaki collection, the mean diversity was h = 0.3, with the lowest value for ISSR15 (h = 0.2) and the highest value for ISSR814.1 (h = 0.4). In the D. lotus collection, the mean diversity was h = 0.1, with the lowest value for ISSR15 (h = 0.0) and the highest value for ISSR13 (h = 0.2).
Identical DNA fingerprints were not observed in the D. kaki collection, but they were in the D. lotus collection. In total, 37 and 33 D. lotus accessions with identical SSR- and ISSR-fingerprint patterns were identified, respectively, within populations and among them (Table 2). Generally, ISSR markers revealed less identical genotypes in three of seven locations (Sochi, Gagra, and Gulripsh). No difference in the determination of identical genotypes between SSR and ISSR markers was observed in two locations (Kalinovoe lake, Piket). Interestingly, a higher number of identical fingerprints was observed by ISSR compared to SSR in two locations of D. lotus (Shkhafit and Sukhum) (Table 3).
In addition, some misclassifications were observed in the core collections of D. kaki based on SSR and ISSR data. Five D. kaki genotypes (“XX Century”, “Jiro”, “Seedless”, “Gosho”, “Geyli1”) that were mostly obtained from the backup core collection (Figure 1) and previously assigned to one and the same cultivar showed different genetic patterns based on both SSR and ISSR markers. Additionally, considering phenotypical traits, these accessions were identified as misclassified cultivars and were excluded from the further analysis. Accessions with a clear assignment of the cultivar name were left in the dataset for further analysis.

3.2. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Diospyros Germplasm

Following STRUCTURE analysis, 80 accessions were grouped into three genetic clusters (K = 3) (Figure 2). Cluster 1 contained only D. lotus accessions, whereas D. kaki accessions were grouped into two clusters (cluster 2 and 3). The 26 D. kaki cultivars in cluster 2 showed no genetic admixture with D. lotus and D. kaki accessions of cluster 3, interestingly. Similarly, cluster 3 included 14 D. kaki cultivars that appeared to be genetically different from the D. kaki cultivars of cluster 2. However, cluster 3 also included nine cultivars with genetic admixtures of 5–50% of cluster 2 and 1. Particularly, the cultivars “Nikitskaya Bordovaya”, “Meader”, “Fuyu” and “Nitari” showed remarkable genetic admixture of cluster 2. Due to the small accession number of D. virginiana, no separate genetic cluster could be found for D. virginiana. Instead, the two D. virginiana accessions showed 80% of alleles that belong to the D. kaki cluster 2 and 20% of the allele frequency was similar to D. lotus.
Based on the SSR data, cluster 2 showed the highest observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.62) (Table 4). This was also confirmed by ISSR data that showed the highest polymorphism level P = 90.28% in cluster 2. A high number of rare and private alleles was revealed in cluster 3 and 2 (data not shown), indicating a high rate of genetic difference. In both D. kaki clusters (2 and 3), the mean polymorphism was 100% based on the SSR data and about 85 and 90% based on ISSR markers, respectively. In contrast, the D. lotus accessions (cluster 1) showed low heterozygosity and low genetic diversity based on both SSR and ISSR data. The mean polymorphism of the applied markers was 38% (SSR) and 33% (ISSR) among D. lotus accessions.

3.3. Phylogenetic Relationships and Connection with Phenotype in Diospyros Collection

In general, PCoA supported the results of the STRUCTURE analysis and showed a comparable relationship for the three clusters observed using the Bayesian iterative algorithm (Figure 3). Cluster 1 combined all D. lotus accessions, which were grouped in their own cluster after PCoA analysis (Figure 3, green circle). However, some D. lotus accessions (Dl10, Dl4, Dl3, Dl2) showed a slight separation from the other D. lotus accessions, which confirmed the admixtures revealed by STRUCTURE analysis.
The PCoA-cluster 2 (Figure 3, orange circle right above) combined 27 genotypes including mostly cultivars of Japanese origin, as well as all Russian and Ukrainian cultivars. Most round-square-shaped cultivars joined this group (“Mountain Rogers”, “Khostinskii”, “MVG Omarova”, “Hybrid №39”). The cultivars “Khostinskii”, “MVG Omarova”, and “Hybrid №39” were descendants of the local cultivar “Jiro” (Figure 4). In addition, most dwarf genotypes joined this cluster (“Tanenashi”, “Sayo”, “Tran Takaki”, “Takura”). However, no pollinator, no pollinator constant non astringent (PCNA) genotype, and no large-fruited genotype occurred in this cluster (Figure 3, Supplementary Table S2).
The PCoA-cluster 3 combined 12 genotypes of D. kaki, including three main pollen donor cultivars “Zenjimaru”, “Pollinator#8” and “Geyli” (Figure 3, orange circle, right below). No PCNA-genotypes joined this cluster, but most of them were pollinator variable astringent and non-astringent. In addition, all large-fruited genotypes are combined in this cluster (“Tamopan”, “Gosho”, “Hachiya”). Moreover, most of the genotypes in this group were tall or medium tree size, either early harvesting (“Seedless”, “Zenjimaru”, “Tsurunoko”, “Hachiya”, “Geyli”) or late harvesting (“Costata”, “Tamopan”, “Gosho”, “Pollinator#8”) with round or flat-round fruit shape (Figure 3, Supplementary Table S2).
Some accessions (Figure 3, blue symbols), previously identified by STRUCTURE as belonging to cluster 3 (D. kaki), showed a distinct group by PCoA and were placed between PCoA-cluster 2 and 3, which included D. kaki accessions. On the basis of the PCoA, these three accessions of D. virginiana seem to be more genetically distant to D. lotus as suggested based on STRUCTURE output. The five accessions of D. kaki (“XX Century”, “Jiro”, “Fuyu”, “Nitari”, “Saburousa”) were also not grouped in PCoA-cluster 2 or 3 but between them, indicating a genetic mixture of both clusters. Interestingly, this inter-cluster combined all constant genotypes: PCNA genotypes (“Jiro”, “XX Century” and “Fuyu”) and pollinator constant astringent genotypes (“Saburousa”, “Nitari”, “Meader”) that were completely missing in both D. kaki PCoA-clusters. In addition, all genotypes of this inter-cluster are early harvesting and most of them are flat-round fruit shaped (Supplementary Table S2). In addition, the most frost tolerant genotypes of the collection such as “Mountain Rogers”, “Nikitskaya Bordovaya”, “Rossiyanka”, “MVG Omarova”, “Meader”, “Costata”, “BBG”, and “Jiro” were grouped closer to D. virginiana and some of them are known to be interspecific hybrids with this species.
To determine any relationship between marker and phenotype data, a phylogenetic analysis using DARWIN was performed based on the most important four fruit traits: harvesting period, fruit size, astringency and fruit shape (Figure 4, Supplementary Table S2). Based on these traits, the core data set of D. kaki accessions was separated into three distant clusters. The phenological traits of many genotypes were clustered according to the genetic clusters obtained based on SSR and ISSR data. For example, “XX Century” and “Fuyu”, with common phenotypical traits such as PCNA, medium fruit size, flat-round fruit shape, and early harvesting, were in one genetic cluster; “Takura”, “Tenjingosho” and “Aizumishirazu” with joint fruit traits such as pollinator constant astringent fruit type, medium fruit mass and long-heart fruit shape were grouped in another genetic cluster. On the other hand, the tree-position of several cultivars did not correlate with the genetic clusters (red colored cultivars, Figure 4). Thus, it can be assumed that not all phenotypical traits follow a grouping according to the genetic cluster. Therefore, the categorization of germplasm accession should be based on phenotypic and genetic traits.

4. Discussion

4.1. Efficiency and Resolving Power of SSR and ISSR Markers

Microsatellites selected for our study were developed previously for Diospyros kaki and were used by several researchers for genetic diversity studies [12,13,14,15,16]. These microsatellites were derived from the cultivar “Rojo Brillante” [15]. Although multibanding pattern was reported for some of these SSRs [15], we did not observe more than two bands in each individual accession. The numbers of detected alleles for these SSRs that were observed in the different studies differed depending on the size of the dataset investigated. For example, ssrdk01 showed six alleles with Ho = 0.73 when the dataset included 12 cultivars [15]. Nevertheless, this marker revealed 12 alleles when the dataset was increased to 71 cultivars [16].
Due to the nature of hexa- and nano-ploidy in the D. kaki genome [40], the expected heterozygosity (He) was not calculated. Our results showed a mean observed heterozygosity (Ho) of 0.6, which is highly consistent with the study of Soriano et al. [15] that detected an observed heterozygosity for selected SSRs in the range of 0.27–0.83 [15]. The level of polymorphic alleles in the D. kaki collection was also high, with P = 100% based on eight SSRs used, and comparable to other studies on Diospyros [6,14,16]. However, many markers were not efficient and SSRs are limited for Diospyros genotyping [19,41]. Therefore, it is still necessary to develop more efficient SSR markers for D. kaki and other Diospyros species that can be used for genotyping and evolutionary studies in artificial or natural populations. In addition, the genetic differences revealed by SSR markers can be underestimated because of homoplasy that was observed in some plant species [25,26], hence, the combination of different marker types can be useful for genetic diversity studies.
A higher level of diversity was observed using selected multilocus ISSR markers. Our results showed that efficient ISSRs are placed between the following genome regions in Diospyros: (CT)8G, (GGAGA)3, (AC)8C, (TC)8C, (CT)8TG. In contrast, inefficient ISSRs for Diospyros were placed between the following regions: (CT)8T, (TAT)5, (CTTCA)3, (TG)8G. On average, 15 bands per ISSR primer in each individual accession were obtained in our Diospyros collection with an allele size range of 200–2500 bp using the mentioned PCR conditions. Another study showed that primers with (AG), (GA), (CT), (TC), (AC), (CA) repeats are more polymorphic than primers with other di-, tri- or tetra-nucleotide repeats [27]. Tri and tetra-nucleotides are less frequent, and their use in ISSRs is lesser than the di-nucleotides. The (AG) and (GA) based primers have been shown to amplify clear bands in several crops, such as rice, citrus, chickpea, etc., whereas primers based on (AC) di-nucleotide repeats were found to be more useful in wheat and potato [27]. However, based on our results, we can confirm the successful usage of tri and tetra-nucleotide primers as well as the effective usage of primers with (AC) di-nucleotide repeats in Diospyros.

4.2. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Diospyros Germplasm

Bayesian analysis showed homogeneity in D. lotus accessions, although all populations were geographically distant. Furthermore, the genetic diversity was low. These results are not consistent with previous data obtained with RAPD markers [5]. In addition, other authors used SCoT markers and indicated higher genetic variation among studied D. lotus accessions [21]. The low genetic diversity can be attributed to the occurrence of a high number of genetically identical accessions in the populations investigated. It is plausible that D. lotus was introduced to the Western Caucasus from a single germplasm source, hence the homogeneity, low genetic diversity and the formation of a private genetic cluster without significant admixtures.
In contrast, we observed the clear separation of D. kaki germplasm into two different clusters using SSR and ISSR markers. Another study on D. kaki germplasm using SSR, IRAP and SCoT markers separated 228 accessions into five genetic clusters mostly based on geographical origin [6,19]. In comparison, our results revealed lower cluster numbers in our D. kaki collection. However, remarkably fewer D. kaki accessions were analyzed in our study, which probably had an influence on the genetic structure. Cluster 2 was characterized by greater homogeneity with less genetic admixtures compared with cluster 3. Cluster 2 mostly combined the cultivars with Japanese origin or locally derived cultivars. In contrast, cluster 3 consist mostly of cultivars that originated from Japan, China or USA.
D. virginiana accessions have been used actively in breeding programs in Russia and Ukraine to develop high cold-tolerant and disease-tolerant cultivars. D. virginiana accessions “Saburouza” and “Meader” joined cluster 3 and showed about 10% of D. lotus admixture. However, the genetic relationship with D. lotus appears implausible and could not be confirmed by the PCoA analysis. It is probable that these accessions were only assigned to the D. lotus cluster because of the small number of D. virginiana accessions in the study. “Meader” is known as D. virginiana species, but “Saburouza” is related to D. kaki species [42]. Based on ISSR data, both cultivars have a similar genetic pattern that is related to D. virginiana.
Several genotypes with remarkable genetic admixtures of cluster 3 and cluster 2 were detected, namely, “Nikitskaya Bordovaya”, “Fuyu” and “Nitari”. “Nikitskaya Bordovaya” was believed to be developed by interspecific hybridization between D. virginiana and D. kaki [11]. However, we have not revealed the same allele distribution as in the other D. virginiana accessions, which is probably also attributed to the small number of D. virginiana accessions in our study.
Surprisingly, “Rossiyanka” was grouped to cluster 2, although it is known to be a interspecific hybrid of D. virginiana and D. kaki [11]. However, since our results showed no genetic admixtures, we speculate that it belongs to D. kaki. The same is true for “MVG Omarova” (cluster 2), which was assumed to be a hybrid of “Jiro” and “Meader” but showed only low interspecific admixture.
“Fuyu” is an important world cultivar and important parental genotype for persimmon breeding in the Western Caucasus [7]. This can be the reason for the high ratio of alleles from both cluster 3 and cluster 2 observed in this genotype by STRUCTURE analysis. “Fuyu” is a cultivar of Japanese origin with a high pollen fertility level and is often used in Russian breeding programs aimed at early harvesting, non-astringency and the medium tree size [43]. Similar admixture profiles were observed in “Nitari” and “Nikitskaya Bordovaya”, although these genotypes have not been used as parents. These cultivars are probably closely related to “Fuyu” and therefore show similar admixture profiles. Further investigation is necessary for a definite conclusion to be made. In addition, “XX Century” and “Jiro” belonged to cluster 3, but have some admixture from cluster 2. “Jiro” was introduced from Japan in 1935 and it has male sterility, but it can be used as a maternal genotype that allows the breeding of new large-fruited PCNA varieties.

4.3. Phylogenetic Relationships and Connection with Phenotype in Diospyros Collection

The main problem of persimmon breeding is the low pollen fertility, hence most cultivars can used only as a mother parent in breeding purposes. In the Western Caucasus, only the cultivars “Zenjimaru”, “Geyli”, “Fuyu” and “Pollinator#8” were used as parental genotypes in breeding programs because they have sufficient fertile pollen. As shown in Figure 3, three of these cultivars except “Fuyu” were grouped together in PCoA-cluster 3. However, “Fuyu” is placed between PCoA-cluster 2 and 3 because it is the paternal genotype for most of the cultivars.
Most accessions in cluster 2 are phenotypically similar and show a dwarf tree phenotype, not big flat fruits with variable astringency and early harvesting period. Interestingly, the cultivars “Fuyu”, “Nitari”, “Nikitskaya”, “XX Century” and “Jiro” have similar phenotypical traits and also showed a close relationship based on ISSR analysis. This result leads us to speculate that these ISSR markers can be useful to find associations with the important traits in persimmon genotypes. In addition, the most frost-tolerant genotypes of the collection, such as “Mountain Rogers”, “Nikitskaya Bordovaya”, “Rossiyanka”, “MVG Omarova”, “Meader”, “Costata”, “BBG”, and “Jiro”, were grouped closer to D. virginiana and some of them are known to be its interspecific hybrids, which was confirmed by ISSR analysis. However, some other frost-tolerant genotypes such as “Pollinator#8” and “Hyakume” were jointly grouped in the distant cluster.
Nevertheless, our results showed no clear clustering by any certain trait (for example, cold tolerance or fruit shape). However, several phenotypical traits considered jointly allowed us to reveal the correlation between phenotypical data and the genetic clusters obtained. For example, the trait combination non astrigent+early ripening+flat-round fruit shape was common for most cultivars clustered in between cluster 2 and 3. Several cultivars (“Tran Takaki”, “Pollinator#8”, “Hiyakume”, “Hachiya”, “Seedless”) were not clustered on the phenotypical tree in accordance with molecular data. Thus, it can be concluded that not all phenotypical traits follow a grouping according to the genetic cluster. These results indicate that a categorization of germplasm accessions should be based on phenotypic and genetic traits.

5. Conclusions

Our results showed the efficiency of the SSR and ISSR markers for inter- and intraspecific genetic diversity studies in Diospyros spp. Low genetic diversity and the formation of a private genetic cluster without significant admixtures were observed in the distant D. lotus populations. Therefore, new efforts are necessary to introduce this germplasm from the other world sources to prevent genetic erosion. The most frost-tolerant genotypes showed a high percentage of genetic admixtures and were grouped close to D. virginiana. Some of them are known to be interspecific hybrids with this species, which was confirmed by our study. The correspondence between the fruit traits and genetic data was observed, particularly with fruit astringency. The results will be useful for further studies to find associations between the markers and phenotypical traits in Diospyros germplasm.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology10040341/s1, Figure S1: Polymorphism of ISSR fragments in D. kaki and D. lotus accessions; Supplement Table S1: Diospyros germplasm collection included in the study; Supplement Table S2: Phenotypical characteristics of the core D. kaki accessions; Supplement Table S3: SSR primers used for the genetic analysis of the Diospyros germplasm collection; Supplementary Table S4: ISSR primers used for the genetic analysis of the Diospyros germplasm collection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S.S.; V.I.M., Data curation, L.S.S., S.R., M.D.O., V.I.M. and A.V.R.; Formal analysis, L.S.S., S.R., N.G.K., A.O.M., G.A.T., R.M.S., E.S.S. and Z.M.O.; Funding acquisition, V.I.M., R.S.R. and A.V.R.; Investigation, L.S.S., N.G.K., A.O.M., G.A.T., R.M.S. and E.S.S.; Methodology, L.S.S., S.R. and Z.M.O.; Project administration, V.I.M., R.V.K. and A.V.R.; Resources, G.A.T., R.S.R., E.S.S., R.V.K., Z.M.O., M.D.O. and A.V.R.; Software, S.R.; Supervision, A.V.R.; Validation, L.S.S., S.R. and Z.M.O.; Visualization, N.G.K.; Writing—original draft, L.S.S.; Writing—review and editing, S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study of the D. kaki core collection was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (program #0492-2021-0006–genetic study; program #0492-2021-0008–phenotypical study). The research of D. lotus populations was carried out with the financial support of the Kuban Science Foundation in the framework of the scientific project #MFI-20.1-22/20.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Francis Ofere Emeriewen is acknowledged for proof-reading of the manuscript as a native speaker.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yesiloglu, T.; Çimen, B.; Incesu, M.; Yilmaz, B. Genetic Diversity and Breeding of Persimmon. In Breeding and Health Benefits of Fruit and Nut Crops; Jaya, R., Nageswara-Rao, M., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Intrigliolo, D.S.; Visconti, F.; Bonet, L.; Parra, M.; Besada, C.; Abrisqueta, I.; Rubio, J.S.; De Paz, J.M. Persimmon (Diospyros kaki) Trees Responses to Restrictions in Water Amount and Quality. In Water Scarcity and Sustainable Agriculture in Semiarid Environment, 1st ed.; Garcia Tejero, I.F., Duran Zuazo, V.H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 149–177. [Google Scholar]
  3. Robert, H.G.; Faik, A.A.; Millson, M.; Huang, H.S.; Chuang, L.T.; Sanz, C.; Golding, J.B. Changes in sugars, acids and fatty acids in naturally parthenocarpic date plum persimmon (Diospyros lotus L.) fruit during maturation and ripening. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, Y.; Ruan, X.; Wang, R. Indigenous Persimmon Germplasm Resources in China. Acta Hortic. 2013, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yildirim, N.; Ercisli, S.; Agar, G.; Orhan, E.; Hizarci, Y. Genetic variation among date plum (Diospyros lotus) genotypes in Turkey. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9, 981–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guan, C.; Zhang, P.; Hu, C.; Chachar, S.; Riaz, A.; Wang, R.; Yang, Y. Genetic diversity, germplasm identification and population structure of Diospyros kaki Thunb. from different geographic regions in China using SSR markers. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 251, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Omarov, M.D. Yield of different cultivars of oriental oersimmon in the humid subtropics of Russia. Subtrop. Orna Mental Hortic. 2018, 65, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Omarov, M.D.; Zagirov, N.G.; Omarova, Z.M.; Avidzba, M.A. Atlas of Cultivars and Hybrids of Oriental Persimmon; Ryndin, A.V., Ed.; Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops: Sochi, Russia, 2014; p. 93. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, W.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xie, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Jin, X.; Dong, W.; Suo, Z. Interspecific chloroplast genome sequence diversity and genomic resources in Diospyros. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reim, S.; Lochschmidt, F.; Proft, A.; Höfer, M. Genetic integrity is still maintained in natural populations of the indigenous wild apple species Malus sylvestris (Mill.) in Saxony as demonstrated with nuclear SSR and chloroplast DNA markers. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 11798–11809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Raddová, J.; Ptáčková, H.; Čechová, J.; Ondrášek, I. Genetic analysis of the genus Diospyros ssp. using RAPD and i-PBS methods. Acta univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2012, 60, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Liang, Y.; Han, W.; Sun, P.; Liang, J.; Wuyun, T.; Li, F.; Fu, J. Genetic diversity among germplasms of Diospyros kaki based on SSR markers. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 186, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, D.-L.; Luo, Z.R. Genetic relationships of the Japanese persimmon Diospyros kaki (Ebenaceae) and related species revealed by SSR analysis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2011, 10, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pinar, H.; Yildiz, E.; Kaplankiran, M.; Toplu, C.; Unlu, M.; Serce, S.; Ercisli, S. Molecular characterization of some selected persimmon genotypes and cultivars by srap and ssr markers. GenetIKA 2017, 49, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soriano, J.M.; Pecchioli, S.; Romero, C.; Vilanova, S.; Llacer, G.; Giordani, E.; Badenes, M.L. Development of microsatellite markers in polyploid persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) from an enriched genomic library. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Naval, M.; Zuriaga, E.; Pecchioli, S.; Llácer, G.; Giordani, E.; Badenes, M.L. Analysis of genetic diversity among persimmon cultivars using microsatellite markers. Tree Genet. Genomes 2010, 6, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yonemori, K.; Honsho, C.; Kanzaki, S.; Ino, H.; Ikegami, A.; Kitajima, A.; Sugiura, A.; Parfitt, D.E. Sequence analyses of the ITS regions and the matK gene for determining phylogenetic relationships of Diospyros kaki (persimmon) with other wild Diospyros (Ebenaceae) species. Tree Genet. Genomes 2007, 4, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jing, Z.; Ruan, X.; Wang, R.; Yang, Y. Genetic diversity and relationships between and within persimmon (Diospyros L.) wild species and cultivated varieties by SRAP markers. Plant Syst. Evol. 2013, 299, 1485–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guan, C.; Chachar, S.; Zhang, P.; Hu, C.; Wang, R.; Yang, Y. Inter- and Intra-specific Genetic Diversity in Diospyros Using SCoT and IRAP Markers. Hortic. Plant J. 2020, 6, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deng, L.; Liang, Q.; He, X.; Luo, C.; Chen, H.; Qin, Z. Investigation and Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Diospyros Germplasms Using SCoT Molecular Markers in Guangxi. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yang, Y.; Yang, T.; Jing, Z. Genetic diversity and taxonomic studies of date plum (Diospyros lotus L.) using morphological traits and SCoT markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 61, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, J.; Liu, H.; Hu, J.; Liang, Y.; Liang, J.; Wuyun, T.; Tan, X. Five Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences from Diospyros: Genome Organization and Comparative Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kalia, R.K.; Rai, M.K.; Kalia, S.; Singh, R.; Dhawan, A.K. Microsatellite markers: An overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 2011, 177, 309–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wambulwa, M.C.; Meegahakumbura, M.K.; Chalo, R.; Kamunya, S.; Muchugi, A.; Xu, J.C.; Liu, J.; Li, D.Z.; Gao, L.M. Nuclear microsatellites reveal the genetic architecture and breeding history of tea germplasm of East Africa. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barkley, N.A.; Krueger, R.R.; Federici, C.T.; Roose, M.L. What phylogeny and gene genealogy analyses reveal about homoplasy in citrus microsatellite alleles. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 282, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Šarhanová, P.; Pfanzelt, S.; Brandt, R.; Himmelbach, A.; Blattner, F.R. SSR-seq: Genotyping of microsatellites using next-generation sequencing reveals higher level of polymorphism as compared to traditional fragment size scoring. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 10817–10833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reddy, P.M.; Sarla, N.; Siddiq, E. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica 2002, 128, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Azhar, M.; Muhammad, H.A.; Siti, N.I.; Parween, K.S.A.S. Optimization of ISSR Markers for Molecular DNA Fingerprinting in Aquilaria sp. In Nuclear Technical Convention; IAEA: Bangi, Malaysia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsumura, Y.; Ohba, K.; Strauss, S.H. Diversity and inheritance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Doug-las-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). Theor. Appl. Genet 1996, 92, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Luz, G.C.; Strioto, D.K.; Mangolin, C.A.; Machado, M.F.P.S. ISSR markers to assess genetic diversity of cultivated populations from artificial selection of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni. Breed. Sci. 2020, 70, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1991, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mondal, T.K. Assessment of genetic diversity of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) by inter-simple sequence repeat polymerase chain reaction. Euphytica 2002, 128, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roy, S.C.; Chakraborty, B.N. Genetic diversity and relationsips among tea (Camellia sinensis) cultivars revealed by RAPD and ISSR based fingerprinting. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. genalex 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar]
  37. Earl, D.A.; Vonholdt, B.M. Structure Harvester: A website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2011, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. DARWIN6.0 Software. Available online: https://darwin.cirad.fr/ (accessed on 10 January 2021).
  40. Zhuang, D.H.; Kitajima, A.; Ishida, M.; Sobajima, Y. Chromosome Numbers of Diospyros kaki Cultivars. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1990, 59, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ma, K.B.; Yang, S.-J.; Jo, Y.-S.; Kang, S.S.; Nam, M. Development of Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR markers for identification of persimmon varieties using genotyping-by-sequencing. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 49, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Parfitt, D.E.; Yonemori, K.; Honsho, C.; Nozaka, M.; Kanzaki, S.; Sato, A.; Yamada, M. Relationships among Asian persimmon cultivars, astringent and non-astringent types. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Omarov, M.D.; Omarova, Z.M. Cultivars of oriental persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) and their biological characteristics. Subtrop. Ornam. Hortic. 2016, 57, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
Biology 10 00341 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographical origin of D. lotus populations (green circles) and location of core collection of D. kaki accessions (red flags) included in the study.
Figure 1. Geographical origin of D. lotus populations (green circles) and location of core collection of D. kaki accessions (red flags) included in the study.
Biology 10 00341 g001
Biology 10 00341 g002 550
Figure 2. Population genetic structure among 80 Diospyros accessions based on 72 ISSR loci. Each genotype is represented by a vertical bar partitioned into K = 3. Each color represents the estimated membership fraction of the three genetic clusters (cluster 1 = red, cluster 2 = green, cluster 3 = blue).
Figure 2. Population genetic structure among 80 Diospyros accessions based on 72 ISSR loci. Each genotype is represented by a vertical bar partitioned into K = 3. Each color represents the estimated membership fraction of the three genetic clusters (cluster 1 = red, cluster 2 = green, cluster 3 = blue).
Biology 10 00341 g002
Biology 10 00341 g003 550
Figure 3. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of pairwise distances between accessions calculated on ISSR markers.
Figure 3. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of pairwise distances between accessions calculated on ISSR markers.
Biology 10 00341 g003
Biology 10 00341 g004 550
Figure 4. Phenotypical variability and Neighbor-Joining clustering of core D. kaki collection based on the following traits: fruit astringency, fruit size, fruit shape and harvesting period. Red cultivars—placement is not in accordance with molecular data.
Figure 4. Phenotypical variability and Neighbor-Joining clustering of core D. kaki collection based on the following traits: fruit astringency, fruit size, fruit shape and harvesting period. Red cultivars—placement is not in accordance with molecular data.
Biology 10 00341 g004
Table
Table 1. Genetic diversity parameters for 8 SSR loci used.
Table 1. Genetic diversity parameters for 8 SSR loci used.
SpeciesSSRNNaNeIHo
D. kakissrdk143211.0005.6111.9770.438
ssrdk263316.0008.4752.4330.606
ssrdk30307.0003.6661.5640.700
ssrdk01364.0002.8831.1420.417
ssrdk03336.0002.3391.0960.667
ssrdk06336.0002.2761.1380.333
ssrdk093110.0004.3191.7210.871
ssrdk103611.0006.9682.1100.694
MEAN ± Standard error 33.0 ± 0.88.9 ± 1.44.6 ± 0.81.6 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.1
D. lotusssrdk14315.0002.4271.0410.839
ssrdk26303.0001.7530.6750.600
ssrdk30283.0001.3320.4640.071
ssrdk01321.0001.0000.0000.000
ssrdk03321.0001.0000.0000.000
ssrdk06321.0001.0000.0000.000
ssrdk09321.0001.0000.0000.000
ssrdk10321.0001.0000.0000.000
MEAN ± Standard error 31.1 ± 0.52.0 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
N: number of analyzed individuals; Na: number of different alleles; Ne: number of effective alleles (=1/(∑pi2)); pi: relative frequency of the ith allele; I = Shannon’s information index = −1 * Sum (pi * Ln (pi)); Ho: observed heterozygosity (=number of heterozygotes/N).
Table
Table 2. Genetic diversity parameters for the selected ISSR markers.
Table 2. Genetic diversity parameters for the selected ISSR markers.
SpeciesMarkerNo bandsAv. Band Freq.NNaNeH
D. kakiISSR815160.39056.0001.7501.5320.307
ISSR880160.25956.0002.0001.5450.323
ISSR1380.50056.0002.0001.6000.360
ISSR814.1170.37056.0002.0001.7050.402
ISSR15150.36856.0001.7331.2410.169
MEAN ± Standard error 14.6 ± 3.00.1 ± 0.056.0 ± 0.01.9 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.0
D. lotusISSR815160.40832.0000.9381.1040.073
ISSR880160.50232.0001.3131.1300.094
ISSR1380.38332.0001.6251.2130.160
ISSR814.1170.30932.0000.8241.1630.096
ISSR15150.86732.0000.8671.0000.000
MEAN ± Standard error 14.4. ± 3.00.5 ± 0.132.0 ± 0.01.1 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.0
N: number of analyzed individuals; Na: number of different alleles; Ne: number of effective alleles (=1/(∑pi2)); pi: relative frequency of the ith allele; h = Diversity = 1 − Sum pi2.
Table
Table 3. Identical allelic pattern of D. lotus accessions based on ISSR and SSR analysis.
Table 3. Identical allelic pattern of D. lotus accessions based on ISSR and SSR analysis.
GroupPopulation LocationNumber of Accessions in the PopulationNumber of Identical Accessions
Based on SSR Data		Number of Identical Accessions
Based on ISSR Data
1Shkhafit646
2Piket433
3Sochi center1265
4Kalinovoe lake100
5Gagra1912 7
6Sukhum1048
7Gulripsh584
TOTAL573733
Table
Table 4. Genetic diversity parameters for each genetic cluster based on SSR and ISSR markers.
Table 4. Genetic diversity parameters for each genetic cluster based on SSR and ISSR markers.
SSRISSR
ClusterNNaNeHo% PNaNeh% P
1 (D. lotus)322.001.310.2037.501.061.110.0833.33
2 (D. kaki)267.134.130.62100.001.811.440.2790.28
3 (D. kaki and hybrids)235.133.440.52100.001.711.510.2984.72
mean 4.752.960.4479.171.521.350.2169.44
N: number of analyzed individuals; Na: mean number of different alleles in the cluster; Ne: mean number of effective alleles in the cluster (=1/(∑pi2)); Ho: observed heterozygosity (=number of heterozygotes/N); h = Diversity (1 − Sum pi2); P = Percentage of Polymorphic Loci.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samarina, L.S.; Malyarovskaya, V.I.; Reim, S.; Koninskaya, N.G.; Matskiv, A.O.; Tsaturyan, G.A.; Rakhmangulov, R.S.; Shkhalakhova, R.M.; Shurkina, E.S.; Kulyan, R.V.; et al. Genetic Diversity in Diospyros Germplasm in the Western Caucasus Based on SSR and ISSR Polymorphism. Biology 2021, 10, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040341

AMA Style

Samarina LS, Malyarovskaya VI, Reim S, Koninskaya NG, Matskiv AO, Tsaturyan GA, Rakhmangulov RS, Shkhalakhova RM, Shurkina ES, Kulyan RV, et al. Genetic Diversity in Diospyros Germplasm in the Western Caucasus Based on SSR and ISSR Polymorphism. Biology. 2021; 10(4):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samarina, Lidia S., Valentina I. Malyarovskaya, Stefanie Reim, Natalia G. Koninskaya, Alexandra O. Matskiv, Gregory A. Tsaturyan, Ruslan S. Rakhmangulov, Ruset M. Shkhalakhova, Ekaterina S. Shurkina, Raisa V. Kulyan, and et al. 2021. "Genetic Diversity in Diospyros Germplasm in the Western Caucasus Based on SSR and ISSR Polymorphism" Biology 10, no. 4: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop