Nanofibers: Friend or Foe?
1
BioNanomaterials, Adolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Rte de l’Ancienne Papeterie, Marly 1, 1723 Fribourg, Switzerland
2
Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park Campus, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales SA2 8PP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Stephen C. Bondy
Fibers 2016, 4(3), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib4030025
Received: 27 June 2016 / Revised: 7 July 2016 / Accepted: 8 July 2016 / Published: 2 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanofibres: Friend or Foe?)
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.
Since the early 1990s nanofibers, particularly those of a carbonaceous content [1] have received heightened interest due to their advantageous physico-chemical characteristics (e.g., high strength, stiffness, semi-conductor, increased thermal conductivity and one of the highest Young’s modulus [2]).[...] View Full-Text
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Petri-Fink, A.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Clift, M.J.D. Nanofibers: Friend or Foe? Fibers 2016, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib4030025
AMA Style
Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Clift MJD. Nanofibers: Friend or Foe? Fibers. 2016; 4(3):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib4030025
Chicago/Turabian StylePetri-Fink, Alke; Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara; Clift, Martin J.D. 2016. "Nanofibers: Friend or Foe?" Fibers 4, no. 3: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib4030025
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Search more from Scilit