Next Article in Journal
Classification of Embroidered Conductive Stitches Using a Structural Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Sisal–Cement Composite Properties After Chemical and Thermal Fiber Treatments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Abacá Fiber Treated with Sodium Hydroxide on Undrained Shear Strength in Organic Silt

by
Jorge Albuja-Sánchez
1,2,*,
Doménica Romero
3 and
Carlos Solórzano-Blacio
1
1
Multidisciplinary Engineering Research Hub (MER Hub), Faculty of Habitat, Infrastructure, and Creativity, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito 170143, Ecuador
2
International Faculty of Innovation PUCE-Icam, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito 170143, Ecuador
3
Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Construcción, Ingeniería Civil, Universidad UTE, Quito 170527, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fibers 2025, 13(10), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13100139
Submission received: 25 August 2025 / Revised: 22 September 2025 / Accepted: 28 September 2025 / Published: 13 October 2025

Abstract

Highly decomposed organic soils exhibit low strength and stability, which pose challenges for geotechnical engineering. This study evaluates the effectiveness of abacá natural fibers treated with 5% NaOH to prevent biodegradation and reinforce organic silt. An experimental program was conducted to investigate the effects of fiber content (1, 1.5, and 2%) and length (5, 10, and 15 mm) on the undrained shear strength (Su), elastic modulus (E50), maximum dry density (MDD), and optimum water content (OWC). The results revealed a slight reduction in MDD and OWC, while Su increased significantly, reaching 104.13% for 1.5% fiber content and 15 mm fiber length. E50 decreased by up to 52.61%, indicating a transition toward more ductile behavior and variability due to the inherent heterogeneity of the soil. ANOVA and post hoc Tukey analyses confirmed the statistical significance of fiber content and length on Su, with optimal performance observed at 1.5% content and 15 mm length. These findings demonstrate that chemically treated abacá fibers provide effective and sustainable soil reinforcement and that chemical treatment is essential to maintain short-term durability in biologically active organic soils.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organic soils exhibit low compressive strength, which often results in excessive deformation, differential settlement, and ground instability, posing significant challenges for infrastructure development in the affected areas. Therefore, it is necessary to explore alternative methods to enhance their mechanical properties. Conventional solutions include the incorporation of nanomaterials; lime; cement; or synthetic fibers such as glass, polyvinyl alcohol, and polypropylene [1,2]. Complementary non-conventional techniques aimed at reducing the carbon footprint have also been proposed, including biocementation, use of biopolymers, microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation [3,4], utilization of agricultural waste such as rice husks [5], and the addition of natural fibers. The latter has demonstrated effectiveness in improving the mechanical performance of various materials, including structural concrete, paving blocks, synthetic polymers, and soft soils [6,7,8].
With respect to soil reinforcement using natural fibers, notable materials include bamboo, jute, coir, palm, sugarcane bagasse, rice husk, and sisal [9]. Experimental evidence indicates that these fibers enhance the compressive strength of both the peak and residual in confined unconfined conditions and improve the California Bearing Ratio (CBR), cohesion, and friction angle under both drained and undrained conditions. Additionally, they contribute to reducing hydraulic conductivity and shrinkage, decreasing the maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC), and controlling the expansion and consolidation processes [10,11,12].
Albuja-Sánchez et al. [13] evaluated the Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), elastic modulus, MDD, and OMC of a sandy silt reinforced with abacá fibers treated with NaOH. The fibers were randomly distributed within the soil matrix at contents of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2% and lengths of 5, 10, and 15 mm. The authors observed an increase in MDD at 0.5% fiber content for all lengths, followed by a decrease at higher fiber contents. In contrast, the OMC increased as the fiber content decreased. The maximum increase in the UCS (1235.10%) was recorded for the 2% fiber content at a length of 15 mm, corresponding to a strain of 10.52% compared to 1.98% in natural soil. This behavior reflects a remarkable enhancement in the material deformability, which was also observed for other combinations of fiber content and length. The authors attributed this improvement to the formation of a three-dimensional confinement network created by the fibers within the soil matrix.
R. Islam et al. [14] investigated the effects of reinforcement of clay soil on UCS and CBR using randomly distributed sugarcane fibers at contents of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1%, with lengths ranging from 20 to 30 mm. The fibers were oven-dried prior to mixing to eliminate microbial activity. The results showed that a 0.6% fiber content led to a 62.50% increase in the UCS, accompanied by a general decrease in the elastic modulus compared to the natural soil, except at a 0.6% dosage. Furthermore, the CBR values increased by 67.35% under unsaturated conditions and 76.98% under saturated conditions, corresponding to fiber contents of 0.6% and 0.8%, respectively. The authors attributed these improvements to the anchoring effect of the fibers, which enhanced particle interlocking. However, fiber contents above 0.6% acted as wedges, separating the soil particles and reducing the interlocking effect.
Moslemi et al. [15] investigated the effects of fiber content (0.5, 1, and 2%); fiber length (0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm); and curing time (1 and 7 days) on the strength of sandy soil reinforced with three types of randomly distributed oven-dried lignocellulosic fibers: softwood bleached kraft pulp (S.B.), old corrugated containers, and high-yield wheat straw soda pulp (W.S.). Optimum performance was obtained with 1% S.B. fibers at a length of 1.5 mm, which led to a 67.25% increase in strength and a 51.76% reduction in pore pressure. However, fiber contents exceeding 1% negatively affected the integrity of the mixture, while dosages greater than 0.5% resulted in a reduction in the elastic modulus relative to that value, although still higher than that of the natural soil. After seven days of curing, an increase in the effective cohesion and a slight decrease in the friction angle were observed. No variations in soil pH, fiber degradation, or the formation of cementitious compounds were detected. Combined with SEM observations, these findings confirmed that the improvement mechanism was exclusively physical and was associated with enhanced interparticle contact between the soil particles and fibers during curing.
Bawadi et al. [16] performed standard compaction tests on clayey soil reinforced with natural fibers from banana, kenaf, and coconut at dosages of 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0% by dry weight of the soil. The fibers were oven-dried before use. The results indicated that, at fiber contents of 1% or higher, regardless of the fiber type, the OWC of the mixture increased because of the higher water absorption capacity of the untreated fibers. At the same time, the MDD decreased, reflecting the lower relative density of the fibers compared to the soil mineral particles.
In summary, the existing literature demonstrates that natural fiber reinforcement is a promising technique for improving the mechanical performance of different soil types, providing comparable benefits to synthetic materials in terms of strength and sustainability. Nonetheless, challenges persist regarding the durability of fibers in aggressive environments, where they are prone to biodegradation, as well as the limited understanding of their influence on organic soils, which are typically characterized by high compressibility and low bearing capacity.

1.1. Organic Soil

Organic soils are composed of plant residues at various stages of decomposition, typically under conditions of excessive moisture for most of the year [17]. These soils commonly originate from the flooding of alluvial plains, where layers of organic residue accumulate. Combined with low temperatures and high precipitation, these conditions create anaerobic environments that slow the decomposition of plant material, ultimately leading to peat formation [18]. Organic soils are characterized by their dark color, putrid odor, spongy consistency, high permeability, high water content, high void ratio, and low density, among other properties [19,20]. Soils are classified as organic when their organic matter content exceeds 20%, and materials with more than 75% organic matter are referred to as peat [21].
Soil organic matter comprises living organisms (bacteria and fungi), partially decomposed material, and fully decomposed material. The fibrous fraction, mainly composed of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, is responsible for water absorption, whereas lignin is more resistant to microbial degradation. Its low specific surface area accounts for its lower density than mineral soils with low or negligible organic contents [22]. Fully decomposed material, known as humus, can be classified as hemic or sapric, depending on its degree of decomposition. Humus formation results from the anaerobic respiration of microorganisms, which obtain energy by breaking down undecomposed or partially decomposed organic matter [23]. Humus primarily consists of humic acids, fulvic acids, and residual lignin [24,25]. These amorphous and colloidal substances exhibit high cation exchange capacities and substantial water retention capabilities. This is because the hydroxyl groups (phenolic and alcoholic) in humic acids and the carboxyl groups (-COOH) are predominant in fulvic acids, with the latter being the main contributor to soil acidity [23].
The organic matter content significantly influences the geotechnical properties of the soils. Huat et al. [26] conducted tests on fibrous and hemic peats from Malaysia and concluded that a higher organic content reduces density, specific gravity, and strength while increasing compressibility, plasticity, and water retention capacity. They also observed that fibrous peats exhibited superior mechanical behavior compared to hemic or sapric peats.
This study focuses on the behavior of organic soil collected from El Garrochal, Quito, Ecuador. Calderón-Carrasco et al. [27] reported that a prehistoric lagoon might have existed in the El Garrochal sector, which gradually drained into the Machángara River, leaving organic sediments that now form part of the soil layers. Mayanquer et al. [28] conducted four boreholes up to 10 m in depth at the site, determining that the soil consists of silty layers with organic matter contents ranging from 6.91% to 40.04%.
Sánchez et al. [29] analyzed soil from Caupicho, a nearby area, using samples and SDMT tests. They identified organic soil layers and, through XRD, found that the soil was mainly composed of plagioclase (78%), muscovite (17%), quartz (3%), and cordierite (2%). Organic matter content ranged from 5% to 25%, and SEM revealed microscopic diatom fossils and unicellular algae with silica walls associated with allophanic volcanic ash from Andean lacustrine environments.
Solórzano-Blacio et al. [30] improved the silty soil from El Garrochal, with a 43.84% predominantly sapric organic content, by adding nanosilica. The XRD analysis showed that the soil primarily contained plagioclase (85%), anhydrite (6%), cordierite (4%), maghemite (3%), and sodalite (2%). The incorporation of 1% nanosilica resulted in a 211.28% increase in the undrained shear strength, slight decrease in the MDD, increase in the OWC, and enhanced liquid and plastic limits.

1.2. Abacá Fiber

Fibers incorporated into soils can vary in shape, diameter, texture, stiffness, and tensile strength, depending on the plant species from which they are extracted. However, for geotechnical applications, the fiber length, dosage, orientation, and their combinations play critical roles in enhancing the soil properties [31,32]. When reinforced soil is subjected to compressive stresses, deformation occurs, generating contact between soil particles and fibers. This contact induces friction, which deforms the fibers and generates tensile stresses within them, as illustrated in Figure 1. Together, these mechanisms form a structural mesh that binds to the soil and increases its strength [33].
Fibers may be randomly distributed, as typically occurs when lime, cement, or nanomaterials are added, producing isotropy and minimizing unreinforced zones [34]. Alternatively, fibers can be oriented in a controlled manner, as in the case of geotextiles.
Wang et al. [35] investigated the effects of jute fibers in expansive soil using direct shear and CU triaxial tests. Fiber contents of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9%; lengths of 6, 12, and 18 mm; and orientations of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° relative to the horizontal, in addition to a random distribution, were considered. Optimal results were achieved with a 0.6% fiber content, 12 mm length, and random distribution, yielding a 48% increase in cohesion, 50% increase in shear strength, and reduction in residual strength loss. They also observed that the soil stiffness decreased with the fiber addition, regardless of the length, dosage, or orientation. Fiber contents above 0.6% led to the formation of weak planes, reducing strength and generating adverse effects, particularly at 0.9% fiber content. Controlled orientations generally exhibit poorer performance than random distribution, because oriented fibers are compressed before being tensioned, which does not contribute to strength and can reduce specimen compactness due to bending and bulging.
Because natural fibers are composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, they are susceptible to microbial decomposition. Moisture absorption and biodegradation are closely related and significantly affect fiber strength [36]. Thermal, biological, and moisture-induced degradation, as well as water absorption, are primarily caused by hemicelluloses in natural fibers [37]. Hollow natural fibers, such as abacá, composed of approximately 56–66% cellulose, 20–25% hemicellulose, and 7–13% lignin, exhibit lower bulk densities and higher water retention capacities [38]. Consequently, a higher moisture absorption increases the risk of microbial attack.
In this context, the present study evaluated the performance of an organic soil improved with abacá fibers subjected to alkaline treatment with NaOH. The influence of fiber content and length was analyzed with respect to key properties, such as Unconfined Compressive Strength, elastic modulus, and compaction characteristics, with the aim of providing new experimental evidence to advance the understanding and practical application of this sustainable ground improvement technique.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Site

A soil sample was collected at a depth of 1.30 m in the “El Garrochal” area, located in the southern part of Quito, Ecuador (Figure 2). The test pit was situated at 0°20′23.83″ S latitude and 78°31′57.05″ W longitude, at an elevation of approximately 2993 m.a.s.l.
The study site lies near the Atacazo and Pichincha Volcanoes within the Quito-San Antonio-Guayllabamba basin, through which the Machángara River flows [39], specifically in the Sanguanchi River subbasin, in the Turubamba sector [40]. The inter-Andean basin comprises tectonically controlled subbasins generally formed by fluvial sedimentary deposits, including pumice, sand, silt, clay, and volcanic ash [41].

2.2. Fiber Treatment

Abacá fiber obtained from Monterrey, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador, was used in this study (Figure 3). Fiber dosages of 1, 1.5, and 2% and lengths of 5, 10, and 15 mm were considered with random distribution.
Organic soils, such as those from El Garrochal, naturally harbor abundant microbial communities that actively decompose organic matter, primarily fungi and bacteria. To demonstrate the microbial activity in the soil used in this study, a trap consisting of cooked rice wrapped in sterilized porous mesh was placed in contact with a soil sample, as shown in Figure 4a. The trap was maintained for seven days under hermetic conditions in a controlled room for ambient humidity and temperature, shielded from direct sunlight. After this period, the porous mesh and cooked rice (Figure 4b,c) exhibited extensive microbial colonization, indicating a high capacity for biological degradation.
Similarly, plant fibers incorporated into the soil are highly susceptible to accelerated deterioration of their mechanical properties owing to microbial activity. Therefore, chemical treatment of the fibers prior to soil incorporation is necessary to reduce their vulnerability to biodegradation [42].
The fibers were treated using an alkaline method: they were immersed in a 5% NaOH solution for 2 h, rinsed with water to remove residues, and oven-dried at 80 °C for 2 h. Cai et al. [43] demonstrated that this treatment removes hemicelluloses and other noncellulosic constituents without causing structural damage to the fiber bundles.
According to Gowthaman et al. [33], this treatment replaces the hydrogen bonds in the hydroxyl groups of cellulose and hemicellulose that bind water molecules, as shown in Equation (1), thereby reducing the water absorption and increasing the fiber surface roughness.
Fiber OH NaOH Fiber O Na + H 2 O

2.3. Homogenization Process of Organic Content and Abacá Fiber Dosage

Studies on the specific gravity of organic soils indicate that a drying temperature between 60 °C and 70 °C is optimal, as higher temperatures can cause carbonization, oxidation, or volatilization of organic components. Conversely, temperatures below 50 °C leave significant amounts of residual water in soil pores [44,45]. Accordingly, all moisture and specific gravity tests in this study were conducted at 60 °C.
Analysis of the collected soil revealed considerable variability in the organic content. To minimize the influence of this variability on the experimental results, the extracted sample was mechanically homogenized with a shovel and then divided into subsamples. These subsamples underwent a second homogenization process using a hand mixer for 15 min. The moisture and organic content were subsequently verified.
The dosage of the treated fibers was determined based on the dry weight obtained from the control moisture tests. Fibers were then incorporated into the homogenized moist soil at the specified lengths and percentages and mechanically mixed until a uniform random distribution was achieved. This procedure is illustrated in Figure 5.

2.4. Testing Program

Once the samples were homogenized and the moisture and organic content of the subsamples were determined, some were allocated for physical and chemical characterization, while others were reserved for mechanical testing. Physical and chemical characterization tests, together with the mechanical behavior tests listed in Table 1, were conducted using the wet method in accordance with standard specifications to preserve the integrity of the soil’s organic content.
The subsamples intended for mechanical testing were allowed to air dry slowly at ambient temperature, avoiding direct sunlight, to reach the target moisture content required for the proposed tests. Once the desired moisture content was achieved, the fibers were incorporated following the procedure described in Section 2.3.
Compaction tests, from which the MDD and OWC were obtained, were performed on natural soil within a moisture range of 40–110%, while, for fiber-reinforced soil, the test was conducted immediately after fiber addition once the moisture content reached 60–90%. Subsequently, the results for each fiber combination were compared to those of natural soil to determine the effect of the fiber content and length on the compaction behavior.
The effect of fiber content and length on undrained shear strength was evaluated through unconfined compression tests for each fiber–length combination, conducted in triplicate. Remolded cylindrical specimens were prepared at 95% of the MDD and OWC and tested after a seven-day curing period. Stress–strain curves were obtained from these tests, from which the peak stress corresponding to the maximum compressive strength was determined. The undrained shear strength (Su) was taken as 50% of the peak stress. Similarly, the secant modulus corresponding to 50% of the maximum strength was determined from these curves.
Finally, the effects of fiber content and length on the undrained shear strength and elastic modulus were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc Tukey test.

2.5. Physical and Chemical Characterization of the Organic Soil

Sieving and sedimentation analyses were performed to determine the particle size distribution. The results presented in Figure 6 indicate that the soil was predominantly composed of silt (59.94%), sand (34.05%), and clay (6.01%). According to Sánchez et al. [29] and Solórzano-Blacio et al. [30], the predominant mineral at the study site is plagioclase, which is an aluminosilicate belonging to the tectosilicate group. These minerals, consisting of tetrahedral silica-aluminum structures, exhibit high internal stability and, combined with the predominance of silt and clay particle sizes, exhibit limited adsorption or chemical reactivity [26].
For organic matter characterization, manual/visual classification according to the Von Post scale was performed, along with pH measurement of the homogenized sample. When compressed, the soil exhibited a pasty consistency and flowed easily, releasing minimal turbid water. Partially decomposed organic matter was barely recognizable within this matrix. Consequently, the soil was classified as H7, which corresponds to highly decomposed peat with a pH of 5. These results align with those reported by Solórzano-Blacio et al. [30], who observed very low fiber content and acidic conditions characteristic of predominantly sapric or humic soils.
The organic content averages and standard deviations indicated low variability among the measurements. Reporting this variability is important, because it represents an additional factor that may help explain the differences in the mechanical behavior of the soil.
The complete soil characterization results are summarized in Table 2.

3. Results

3.1. Compaction Behavior

Compaction tests were conducted for each combination of fiber length and dosage, and the natural soil was tested in triplicate. ASTM Method A was employed based on particle size distribution. The compaction curves for each combination, as well as for natural soil, were fitted using quadratic functions. The results are summarized in Table 3, which shows a general trend of reduced MDD and OWC, with high coefficients of determination (R2) for the fitted curves.
Figure 7a illustrates the relationship between MDD and fiber content for different lengths. An initial reduction in the MDD was observed, followed by stabilization, independent from both the fiber content and length.
Figure 7b shows the relationship between the OWC and fiber content for each length. A slight initial reduction was followed by a small increase, never exceeding the initial value and showing no clear trend.

3.2. Unconfined Compression Strength

Unconfined compressive tests were conducted in triplicate on remolded specimens prepared at OWC and 95% MDD. Table 4 presents the average void ratios and degrees of saturation of the specimens. Notably, despite the high compaction, the void ratio remained relatively high.
The Su results are presented in Figure 8, which shows the Su for each fiber combination compared with the natural soil, including error bars. The maximum increase of 104.13% (46.17 kPa) was achieved with 15 mm fibers at a 1.5% content, significantly exceeding that of the natural soil, which exhibited 22.62 kPa.
It can be observed that the peak stress increases with fiber inclusion compared to the unreinforced samples, regardless of the fiber content or length. Moreover, a higher fiber content corresponds to a higher peak stress, which is consistent across all the tested fiber lengths. Finally, the short error bars indicate high reliability of the results obtained for this parameter.
E50 exhibited nonlinear behavior and greater variability across fiber combinations compared to Su, as shown in Figure 9. In general, fiber incorporation tended to reduce E50 by up to 52.61% relative to natural soil, indicating a more ductile response. Although a maximum E50 of 1.67 MPa was observed for 1.5% fibers at 15 mm, similar to the combinations yielding the highest Su, other high-strength combinations, such as 2% fibers at 10 mm, resulted in a lower E50 of 0.86 MPa.
Figure 10 shows the tested specimens after 7 days of curing. No evidence of degradation of the treated fibers or odors, indicating deterioration, was observed. Furthermore, the pH measurements of the specimens revealed no changes relative to the initial values.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Abacá Fibers on MDD and OWC

This reduction in MDD aligns with the findings of Bawadi et al. [16] and Albuja-Sánchez et al. [13], who reported that the dry density decreased at fiber contents equal to or greater than 1%. This reduction can be explained by the replacement of soil mineral particles with fibers. Because organic matter is lighter than minerals, its density decreases. However, in this study, the soil had a high organic content with a density similar to that of natural fibers. Consequently, soil organic matter partially replaced the mineral particles, resulting in a low natural MDD. Upon adding abacá fiber, both soil organic matter and mineral particles are partially replaced, and as the densities of organic matter and fibers are similar, the change becomes negligible and density stabilizes, regardless of the fiber length or dosage. This is evident in Figure 7a, where no significant differences are observed among the trends for different fiber lengths.
Regarding OWC, the organic matter replaced by abacá fibers, which are predominantly sapric, has a high water absorption capacity. In contrast, NaOH-treated fibers, which do not decompose like natural organic matter, exhibit a lower water absorption capacity, explaining the overall reduction in OWC. However, no significant variation in the OWC was observed as a function of fiber content or length, as shown in Figure 7b. Table 3 shows that the OWC values ranged from 68.94% to 72.47%, representing a relatively small variability of 3.53%.

4.2. Effect of Abacá Fibers on Undrained Shear Strength

Summary of the ANOVA presented in Table 5 confirmed that fiber content, fiber length, and their interaction had a statistically significant effect on Su (p < 0.05), with a very high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9956). This indicates that nearly all of the variability in Su can be explained by the experimental factors evaluated.
The post hoc Tukey test, summarized in Table 6, showed that all pairwise comparisons between fiber lengths (5, 10, and 15 mm) were significant, demonstrating a clear trend of increasing Su with the fiber length. Regarding fiber content, significant differences were observed between 1.0–1.5% and 1.0–2.0%, whereas the 1.5–2.0% comparison showed no significant difference. This suggests that the effects of fibers at 1.5% and 2.0% are statistically indistinguishable, indicating that the optimal fiber content for this study was 1.5%. Higher fiber contents may have limited benefits owing to the formation of agglomerates and local weak planes, which reduces the homogeneity of the internal reinforcement distribution.
The observed increase in Su is particularly relevant, given the highly organic nature of the soil. The alkaline NaOH treatment likely enhanced the surface roughness of the fibers, contributing to greater friction and mechanical anchoring between the organic and mineral components of the soil and fibers. Additionally, this treatment prevented fiber decomposition during the curing period despite the high microbial activity, promoting more efficient interactions between components, as reported by Moslemi et al. [15].

4.3. Effect of Abacá Fibers on Elastic Modulus

This result is consistent with the findings of R. Islam et al. [14] and Wang et al. [35], where fibers acted as tensile elements and delayed brittle failure but reduced the initial stiffness. This variability is reflected in the error bars in Figure 9.
The ANOVA presented in Table 7 indicates the significant effects of the experimental factors and their interaction on E50 (p < 0.05), although with lower explanatory power (R2 = 0.8236). The post hoc Tukey test shown in Table 8 revealed that only the difference between 1.5% and 2.0% fiber content was significant. This suggests that, although fiber inclusion modifies the overall behavior of E50, the pointwise differences between pairs of fiber lengths or contents are generally not statistically significant. This result indicates that the effect of fibers on stiffness is subtler and more heterogeneous than that on the undrained shear strength, which is consistent with the higher variability observed in the error bars in Figure 9.
The coefficient of determination indicates that 82.36% of the variations in E50 are explained by fiber content, fiber length, and their interaction, whereas the remaining 17.64% can be attributed mainly to the heterogeneity of organic soil, as noted by Huat et al. [26]. Despite homogenization, a standard deviation of 2.17% in organic content may have produced local structural variations, making it difficult for fiber reinforcement to generate consistent effects on stiffness. Consequently, the ANOVA detected global differences in the E50 reduction, but the Tukey test did not identify significant changes in most pairwise comparisons. In contrast, Su was less affected by this heterogeneity, which explains why the differences between combinations were statistically significant in that case.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the effect of incorporating abacá fibers treated with 5% NaOH on the geotechnical properties of highly decomposed organic silt (Von Post Classification H7). The main findings derived from the statistical analysis led to the following conclusions.
  • Influence on compaction properties: The addition of treated abacá fibers caused a slight reduction in MDD and OWC. This behavior is attributed to the replacement of mineral and organic soil components with a lower-density fibrous material, which, due to chemical treatment, exhibits a lower water absorption capacity than the natural sapric organic matter of the soil.
  • Significant strength improvement: Reinforcement with treated abacá fibers proved effective in increasing Su of the organic silt. A maximum increase of 104.13% was observed for a fiber content of 1.5% and length of 15 mm. ANOVA confirmed that fiber content, fiber length, and their interaction had a statistically significant effect on Su, explaining 99.56% of the observed variability. This improvement is attributed to the anchoring and friction mechanisms between the fibers and the soil matrix, as well as the NaOH treatment, which prevented biodegradation and increased the fiber surface roughness, thereby enhancing the reinforcement mechanism.
  • Optimization of reinforcement parameters: Post hoc Tukey analysis indicated that fiber length significantly influences Su, with the best results obtained using 15 mm fibers. Regarding fiber content, the optimal dosage was identified as 1.5%, as no statistically significant differences were observed compared to the 2.0% dosage. The lack of additional benefit at higher contents is likely due to agglomerate formation, which can reduce the effectiveness of fiber reinforcement.
  • Increase in ductility: Fiber incorporation transformed the soil behavior from brittle to ductile, as evidenced by a general reduction in E50 of up to 52.61%. However, this parameter exhibited a high variability. Although the ANOVA confirmed a significant effect of the experimental factors, its predictive power was moderate (R2 = 0.8236). This result, together with the post hoc Tukey analysis, which found no significant differences for most pairs of fiber lengths or contents, is attributed to the inherent heterogeneity of the organic soil. These findings indicate that E50 is more sensitive to soil variability than the undrained shear strength.
While this study provides valuable evidence regarding the effectiveness of treated abacá fibers in improving the properties of organic silt, certain limitations must be acknowledged.
  • Long-Term Durability and Environmental Considerations: The seven-day curing period does not allow for an assessment of fiber durability in active organic soils. Although NaOH treatment and the absence of visible decomposition are promising, microbial degradation and the potential gradual release of Na+ into soil cannot be ruled out. This release could affect the electrical conductivity, pH, and exchangeable cations of the sapric soils. Fibers were rinsed to minimize residual NaOH; however, future studies should monitor these parameters to ensure the long-term effectiveness and safety of fiber reinforcement.
  • Necessity of NaOH treatment: Future research could quantitatively assess the need for fiber treatment by comparing untreated samples with fibers subjected to different curing durations. This approach allows the evaluation of the effect of fiber biodegradation on the undrained shear strength and elastic modulus.
  • Limited Parameter Range: The study was limited to three fiber dosages (1, 1.5, and 2%) and three lengths (5, 10, and 15 mm). While this range allowed the identification of an optimal trend, the maximum strength might be achieved with longer fibers, which could introduce handling and homogenization challenges.
  • Elastic Modulus Variability: The high variability observed in E50 can be attributed to the fact that only three tests were performed per combination. Future studies could consider testing a larger number of specimens per combination to reduce this variability and better clarify the elastic modulus trend.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fib13100139/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R. and J.A.-S.; Data curation, C.S.-B.; Formal analysis, C.S.-B.; Investigation, C.S.-B.; Methodology, D.R.; Resources, D.R.; Supervision, J.A.-S.; Validation, J.A.-S.; Writing—original draft, D.R.; Writing—review and editing, C.S.-B. and J.A.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We extend our deepest gratitude to the Laboratory of Construction Materials, Soil Mechanics, Pavements, and Geotechnics at the Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, as well as the staff of the Research Department at PUCE, for their valuable support during the development of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MDDMaximum dry density
OWCOptimum water content
SuUndrained shear strength
E50Elastic modulus at 50% of maximum strength
UCSUnconfined Compressive Strength
NaOHSodium hydroxide
SEMScanning electron microscopy
XRDX-ray diffraction
CBRCalifornia Bearing Ratio
CUConsolidated undrained (triaxial test)
R2Coefficient of determination
ANOVAAnalysis of variance
H7Von Post Classification: highly decomposed peat

References

  1. Sharma, A.K.; Asce, A.M.; Kolathayar, S. Comparative Study of Sisal and PVA Fiber for Soil Improvement. In Geo-Congress 2019: Soil Improvement (GSP 309); American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2019; pp. 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kekeç, E.; Sert, S.; Arslan, E.; Bol, E.; Özocak, A. Experimental Investigation on the Variation in Shear Strength of Clayey Soil Reinforced with Randomly Distributed Alkali-Resistant Glass Fiber. Sak. Univ. J. Sci. 2022, 26, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Contreras, C.; Albuja-Sánchez, J.; Proaño, O.; Ávila, C.; Damián-Chalán, A.; Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. The Influence of Abaca Fiber Treated with Sodium Hydroxide on the Deformation Coefficients Cc, Cs, and Cv of Organic Soils. Fibers 2024, 12, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, C.; Wei, K.; Gu, J.; Huang, X.; Dai, X.; Liu, Q. Combined Effect of Biopolymer and Fiber Inclusions on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Soil. Polymers 2022, 14, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Baldin, C.R.B.; Kawanami, M.Y.; Costa, W.G.S.; Bordignon, V.R.; da Luz, C.C.; Izzo, R.L.D.S. Mechanical properties of a clay soil reinforced with rice husk under drained and undrained conditions. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2023, 15, 2676–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Molina-Román, P.; Capelo, C.; Anaguano-Marcillo, M.; Solórzano, C.; Albuja-Sánchez, J.; Gómez, N.B.Y.; Khorami, M.; García-Troncoso, N.; Damián-Chalán, A. Analysis of the Influence of Sugarcane Bagasse Fibers in the Natural State on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete. J. Nat. Fibers 2025, 22, 2451407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palmay, P.; Sanipatin, S.; Poalacin, D.; Donoso, D. Mejoramiento de las propiedades mecánicas del polipropileno reciclado mediante adición de fibras vegetales, polietilen terftalato y tratamiento térmico. Perfiles 2022, 1, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shantveerayyaa, K.; Kumar, C.L.M.; Shwetha, K.G.; Jima, F.; Fufa, K. Performance Evaluation of Hollow Concrete Blocks Made with Sawdust Replacement of Sand: Case Study of Adama, Ethiopia. Int. J. Eng. Trans. B Appl. 2022, 35, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Medina-Martinez, C.J.; Sandoval-Herazo, L.C.; Zamora-Castro, S.A.; Vivar-Ocampo, R.; Reyes-Gonzalez, D. Natural Fibers: An Alternative for the Reinforcement of Expansive Soils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Datta, N.M.; Achuthan, A. Stabilization of expansive soil with terrasil and coir fiber as a subgrade for pavement. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 391, 01019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Guo, P.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, H. Behavior of fiber-reinforced and lime-stabilized clayey soil in triaxial tests. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brahmachary, T.K.; Rokonuzzaman, M. Investigation of random inclusion of bamboo fiber on ordinary soil and its effect CBR value. Int. J. Geo-Eng. 2018, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Albuja-Sánchez, J.; Alcívar, E.; Escobar, D.; Montero, J.; Realpe, G.; Muñoz, A.; Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. Influence of Abaca Fiber Inclusion on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Reconstituted Sandy Silts. Fibers 2022, 10, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Islam, R.; Islam, R.; Sayeed, M.A.; Billah, M.M. Improvement of natural subgrade soil for road construction by the use of sugarcane fiber. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering 2024, Chattogram, Bangladesh, 12–14 December 2024; Available online: https://icace2024.cuet.ac.bd (accessed on 15 July 2025).
  15. Moslemi, A.; Tabarsa, A.; Mousavi, S.Y.; Monfared, M.H.A. Shear strength and microstructure characteristics of soil reinforced with lignocellulosic fibers-Sustainable materials for construction. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 356, 129246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bawadi, N.F.; Ahmad, N.S.; Mansor, A.F.; Anuar, S.A.; Rahim, M.A. Effect of natural fibers on the soil compaction characteristics. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 476, 012043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Łachacz, A.; Kalisz, B.; Sowiński, P.; Smreczak, B.; Niedźwiecki, J. Transformation of Organic Soils Due to Artificial Drainage and Agricultural Use in Poland. Agriculture 2023, 13, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Łachacz, A.; Bogacz, A.; Glina, B.; Kalisz, B.; Mendyk, Ł.; Orzechowski, M.; Smólczyński, S.; Sowiński, P. Origin, transformation and classification of organic soils in Poland. Soil Sci. Annu. 2024, 75, 195241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mushtaq, A.; Sachar, E.A. Determination of Shear Strength of Organic Soil in Kashmir. Int. J. Innov. Res. Eng. Manag. 2022, 9, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meyer, Z.; Magdalena, O. Analysis of using the empirical model of organic soil consolidation to predict settlement. ACEE 2023, 16, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nur, A.S.; Alistair, D.G.; Habib, M.M. A Review on Experimental Investigations and Geotechnical Characteristic of Peat Soil Stabilization. Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Innov. 2023, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Navarro, G.; Navarro, S. Materia orgánica del suelo. In Química Agrícola, 2nd ed.; Aedos, S.A.E., Ed.; Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 2003; Chapter 4; pp. 53–77. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan, K.H. Colloidal Chemistry of Organic Soil Constituents. In Principles of Soil Chemistry, 4th ed.; Taylor and Francis Group: Athens, GA, USA, 2011; Chapter 5; pp. 75–130. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chong, W.A.; Chan, C.M.; Sani, S.; Rahman, N.K.A.; Yahya, N.F. Soil stabilisation for laying road foundations: Way forward with organic soil treatment. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1205, 012070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaneco, S.; Itoh, K.; Katsumata, H.; Suzuki, T.; Masuyama, K.; Funasaka, K.; Hatano, K.; Ohta, K. Removal of natural organic polyelectrolytes by adsorption onto tobermorite. Environ. Sci Technol. 2003, 37, 1448–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huat, B.; Kazemian, S.; Asadi, A. Experimental Investigation on Geomechanical Properties of Tropical Organic Soils and Peat. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2009, 2, 184–188. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26624651 (accessed on 10 July 2025).
  27. Calderón-Carrasco, A.; Galarza-Poveda, B.; Damián-Chalán, A.; Albuja-Sánchez, J. Effect of Storage Time on the Structural Integrity of Silts and Organic Soils: An Analysis of Moisture Content, Unconfined Compressive Strength, and Elasticity. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mayanquer, J.; Anaguano-Marcillo, M.; Játiva, N.; Albuja-Sánchez, J. New Correlations for the Determination of Undrained Shear, Elastic Modulus, and Bulk Density Based on Dilatometer Tests (DMT) for Organic Soils in the South of Quito, Ecuador. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 8570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sánchez, E.F.; Albuja-Sánchez, J.; Córdova, M. Integrated Geotechnical Analysis of Allophanic Volcanic Ash Soils: SDMT and Laboratory Perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Solórzano-Blacio, C.; Albuja-Sánchez, J. Effect of Nanosilica on the Undrained Shear Strength of Organic Soil. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maity, J.; Chattopadhyay, B.C.; Mukherjee, S.P. Improvement of Characteristics of Clayey Soil Mixed with Randomly Distributed Natural Fibers. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. A 2018, 99, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdi, M.K.R.; Parsa-Pajouh, A.; Arjomand, M.A.; Abdi, M.R.; Parsapajouh, A.; Arjomand, M.A. Effects of Random Fiber Inclusion on Consolidation, Hydraulic Conductivity, Swelling, Shrinkage Limit and Desiccation Cracking of Clays. 2008. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228622495 (accessed on 25 July 2025).
  33. Gowthaman, S.; Nakashima, K.; Kawasaki, S. A state-of-the-art review on soil reinforcement technology using natural plant fiber materials: Past findings, present trends and future directions. Materials 2018, 11, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, M.; Guo, W.; Luo, Q. Comparison of Nanomaterials with Other Unconventional Materials Used as Additives for Soil Improvement in the Context of Sustainable Development: A Review. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Y.-X.; Guo, P.P.; Ren, W.X.; Yuan, B.X.; Yuan, H.P.; Zhao, Y.L.; Cao, P. Laboratory Investigation on Strength Characteristics of Expansive Soil Treated with Jute Fiber Reinforcement. Int. J. Geomech. 2017, 17, 04017101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fode, T.A.; Jande, Y.A.C.; Kivevele, T.; Rahbar, N. A Review on Degradation Improvement of Sisal Fiber by Alkali and Pozzolana for Cement Composite Materials. J. Nat. Fibers 2024, 21, 2335327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karimah, A.; Ridho, M.R.; Munawar, S.S.; Ismadi; Amin, Y.; Damayanti, R.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Wulandari, A.P.; Nurindah; Iswanto, A.H.; et al. A comprehensive review on natural fibers: Technological and socio-economical aspects. Polymers 2021, 13, 4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Indrawati, S.; Yuwana, L.; Suyatno; Zainuri, M. The Characterization of Structures and Porosity of Abaca Fiber. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2024, 2780, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Winckell, A. Los Paisajes Naturales del Ecuador, 1st ed.; Centro Ecuatoriano de Investigación Geográfica: Quito, Ecuador, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  40. Albuja-Sánchez, J.D. Determination of the undrained shear strength of organic soils using the cone penetration test and Marchetti’s flat dilatometer test. Int. Soc. Soil Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2021, 6, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Villagómez, D. Evolución Geolgica Plio-Cuaternaria del Valleinterandino Central en Ecuador (Zona de Quito-Guayllabamba-Sanantonio); Escuela Politécnica Nacional: Quito, Ecuador, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  42. Khalid, M.Y.; Imran, R.; Arif, Z.U.; Akram, N.; Arshad, H.; Al Rashid, A.; Márquez, F.P.G. Developments in chemical treatments, manufacturing techniques and potential applications of natural-fibers-based biodegradable composites. Coatings 2021, 11, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cai, M.; Takagi, H.; Nakagaito, A.N.; Li, Y.; Waterhouse, G.I.N. Effect of alkali treatment on interfacial bonding in abaca fiber-reinforced composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 90, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, W.; O’Kelly, B.C.; Yang, M.; Fang, K.; Li, X.; Li, H. Briefing: Specific gravity of solids relationship with ignition loss for peaty soils. Geotech. Res. 2020, 7, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. O’Kelly, B.C. Biodegradation of biosolids and specific gravity determination. Environ. Geotech. 2016, 6, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. ASTM D7928-21e1; Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
  47. ASTM D1140-17; Test Methods for Determining the Amount of Material Finer than 75-m (No. 200) Sieve in Soils by Washing. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017. [CrossRef]
  48. ASTM D4318-17e1; Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017. [CrossRef]
  49. ASTM D2487-17e1; Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017. [CrossRef]
  50. ASTM D2974-20e1; Determining the Water (Moisture) Content, Ash Content, and Organic Material of Peat and Other Organic Soils. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020. [CrossRef]
  51. ASTM D854-23; Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by the Water Displacement Metod. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2023. [CrossRef]
  52. ASTM D1557-12(2021); Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
  53. ASTM D2166/D2166M-16; Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016. [CrossRef]
  54. ASTM D4972-13; Test Method for pH of Soils. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [CrossRef]
  55. ASTM D5715-00; Standard Test Method for Estimating the Degree of Humification of Peat and Other Organic Soils (Visual/Manual Method). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2000. Available online: www.astm.org (accessed on 20 July 2025).
Figure 1. Interaction mechanism between fibers and soil particles.
Figure 1. Interaction mechanism between fibers and soil particles.
Fibers 13 00139 g001
Figure 2. Location of El Garrochal.
Figure 2. Location of El Garrochal.
Fibers 13 00139 g002
Figure 3. Abacá fibers with lengths of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm were used.
Figure 3. Abacá fibers with lengths of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm were used.
Fibers 13 00139 g003
Figure 4. (a) Installation of the rice trap; (b) rice trap mesh bag before 7 days of microbial colonization; (c) colonized rice before 7 days of microbial colonization.
Figure 4. (a) Installation of the rice trap; (b) rice trap mesh bag before 7 days of microbial colonization; (c) colonized rice before 7 days of microbial colonization.
Fibers 13 00139 g004
Figure 5. Homogenization of the organic content and fiber dosage.
Figure 5. Homogenization of the organic content and fiber dosage.
Fibers 13 00139 g005
Figure 6. Particle size distribution of the soil.
Figure 6. Particle size distribution of the soil.
Fibers 13 00139 g006
Figure 7. Effect of fiber content at different fiber lengths on (a) MDD; (b) OWC.
Figure 7. Effect of fiber content at different fiber lengths on (a) MDD; (b) OWC.
Fibers 13 00139 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of the undrained shear strength between the fiber combinations and control specimens with error bars.
Figure 8. Comparison of the undrained shear strength between the fiber combinations and control specimens with error bars.
Fibers 13 00139 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of elastic modulus between fiber combinations and control specimen with error bars.
Figure 9. Comparison of elastic modulus between fiber combinations and control specimen with error bars.
Fibers 13 00139 g009
Figure 10. Soil specimen tested after 7 days of curing.
Figure 10. Soil specimen tested after 7 days of curing.
Fibers 13 00139 g010
Table 1. Summary of tests performed, applicable standards, and number of repetitions.
Table 1. Summary of tests performed, applicable standards, and number of repetitions.
Laboratory TestParameterStandardTest Realized Number
Particle-Size DistributionGravel, sand, lime and clay fraction [%]ASTM D 7928 [46]3 for each standard
ASTM D 1140 [47]
Atterberg LimitsLL, LP, IP [%]ASTM D 4318 [48]3 for homogenized sample
USCS ClassificationSoil ClassificationASTM D 2487 [49]3 for homogenized sample
Organic ContentOrganic fraction [%]ASTM D 2974 [50]9 triplicate tests on homogenized sample, for a total of 27
Specific GravityGsASTM D 854 [51]2 for homogenized sample
Laboratory CompactionMDD and OWCASTM D 1557 [52]1 for each combination of dosage and fiber content at least
Unconfined Compression TestSu, E50ASTM D 2166 [53]3 for each combination of dosage and fiber content
pH determinationpHASTM D 5298 [54]3 for homogenized sample
Von Post ClassificationH1 to H10ASTM D 5715 [55]3 for homogenized sample
Table 2. Summary of the organic soil properties.
Table 2. Summary of the organic soil properties.
PropertyValuePropertyValue
Sand fraction34.05%Specific gravity1.98
Silt fraction59.94%MDD0.6618 gr/cm3
Clay fraction6.01%OWC75.53%
Liquid limit, LL349.85%Von Post ClassificationH7
Plastic limit, PL194.95%pH5
Plasticity index, PI154.90%Average Organic Content [%]33.88%
USCS classificationOrganic silt with sand (OH)Organic Content Standard Deviation2.17
Table 3. Summary of the effects of fibers on MDD and OWC.
Table 3. Summary of the effects of fibers on MDD and OWC.
Fiber Content [%]Fiber Length [mm]MDD [g/cm3]OWC [%]R2MDD Reduction [%]OWC Reduction [%]
000.661875.530.8421--------------
150.623569.510.92895.79%7.97%
1.550.622669.020.94565.92%8.62%
250.625670.860.99075.47%6.18%
1100.618569.490.98636.54%8.00%
1.5100.622570.130.93825.94%7.15%
2100.633368.940.98194.31%8.73%
1150.619269.860.94476.44%7.51%
1.5150.622570.170.99225.94%7.10%
2150.629472.470.95764.90%4.05%
Table 4. Summary of the average physical properties of remolded specimens.
Table 4. Summary of the average physical properties of remolded specimens.
Fiber Content [%]Fiber Length [mm]Average Water Content [%]Average Dry Density [g/cm3]Average Degree of Saturation [%]Average Void Ratio
0072.890.6265.872.20
1572.400.6062.142.31
1.5572.770.5961.262.35
2572.470.6062.222.31
11072.580.6063.032.28
1.51072.280.6061.742.32
21072.400.6062.342.30
11572.660.6163.682.26
1.51572.480.6062.332.30
21572.620.6061.872.32
Table 5. ANOVA of the undrained shear strength.
Table 5. ANOVA of the undrained shear strength.
Experimental FactorSum of SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean SquareF Valuep-ValueF Critical ValueSignificance (ANOVA)
Fiber Content91.53245.77158.653.70 × 10−123.55Yes
Fiber Length1039.222519.611801.181.86 × 10−213.55Yes
Interaction39.2249.8133.993.65 × 10−82.93Yes
Error5.19180.29
Total1175.1726
Coefficient of Determination (R2)0.9956
Table 6. Post hoc Tukey analysis of the undrained shear strength.
Table 6. Post hoc Tukey analysis of the undrained shear strength.
Fiber Length ComparisonsFiber Content Comparisons
Mean difference critical value1.12Mean difference critical value1.12
Pairwise
Comparison
Mean
Difference
Significant (Tukey Test)Pairwise
Comparison
Mean
Difference
Significant (Tukey Test)
15 mm vs. 5 mm15.20Yes1.5% vs. 2.0%0.03No
15 mm vs. 10 mm7.60Yes1.5% vs. 1.0%3.89Yes
10 mm vs. 5 mm7.59Yes1.0% vs. 2.0%3.92Yes
Table 7. ANOVA of the elastic modulus.
Table 7. ANOVA of the elastic modulus.
Experimental FactorSum of SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean SquareF Valuep-ValueF Critical ValueSignificance (ANOVA)
Fiber Content0.5020.2512.284.33 × 10−43.55Yes
Fiber Length0.1720.084.103.42 × 10−23.55Yes
Interaction1.0540.2612.834.12 × 10−52.93Yes
Error0.37180.02
Total2.0826
Coefficient of Determination (R2)0.8236
Table 8. Post hoc Tukey analysis of the elastic modulus.
Table 8. Post hoc Tukey analysis of the elastic modulus.
Fiber Length ComparisonsFiber Content Comparisons
Mean difference critical value0.30Mean difference critical value0.30
Pairwise
Comparison
Mean
Difference
Significant (Tukey Test)Pairwise
Comparison
Mean
Difference
Significant (Tukey Test)
15 mm vs. 5 mm0.19No1.5% vs. 2.0%0.33Yes
15 mm vs. 10 mm0.12No1.5% vs. 1.0%0.11No
10 mm vs. 5 mm0.07No1.0% vs. 2.0%0.11No
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albuja-Sánchez, J.; Romero, D.; Solórzano-Blacio, C. Influence of Abacá Fiber Treated with Sodium Hydroxide on Undrained Shear Strength in Organic Silt. Fibers 2025, 13, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13100139

AMA Style

Albuja-Sánchez J, Romero D, Solórzano-Blacio C. Influence of Abacá Fiber Treated with Sodium Hydroxide on Undrained Shear Strength in Organic Silt. Fibers. 2025; 13(10):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13100139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albuja-Sánchez, Jorge, Doménica Romero, and Carlos Solórzano-Blacio. 2025. "Influence of Abacá Fiber Treated with Sodium Hydroxide on Undrained Shear Strength in Organic Silt" Fibers 13, no. 10: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13100139

APA Style

Albuja-Sánchez, J., Romero, D., & Solórzano-Blacio, C. (2025). Influence of Abacá Fiber Treated with Sodium Hydroxide on Undrained Shear Strength in Organic Silt. Fibers, 13(10), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13100139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop