Next Article in Journal
Ecological Ammonium Thiocyanate-Modified Geopolymeric Coating for Flame-Retarding Plywood
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Properties of M3B2-Type Boride-Based Cermet Coatings Prepared by Laser Cladding Synthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/coatings9080477
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrophobic Modification of Magnesium Hydroxide Coating Deposited Cathodically on Magnesium Alloy and its Corrosion Protection

by
Yongjun Zhang
1,*,
Hui Cao
1,
Hanxiong Huang
1 and
Zhiping Wang
2,*
1
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Engineering Center of Topical Precise Drug Delivery System, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2019, 9(8), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080477
Submission received: 2 January 2019 / Revised: 16 February 2019 / Accepted: 18 February 2019 / Published: 29 July 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, hydrophobic modification of magnesium hydroxide film prepared by cathodic deposition on ME20M Mg alloy was achieved with ethanol solution of stearic acid. The effects of solution concentration, temperature and treatment time on the surface wettability were investigated. The corrosion behaviors of typical samples were evaluated by droplet test, total immersion corrosion test as well as PDP (Potentiodynamic Polarization) and EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) techniques, respectively. Adhesion of coatings to the substrate were examined by tape test. The surface morphology and chemical composition of typical coatings were characterized by SEM, FTIR and XRD respectively. The results indicate that the superhydrophobic surface with 151.5° water static contact angle and 1° sliding angle could be fabricated successfully by simple immersion in a low-concentration stearic acid solution for a short period. Compared with blank sample, the composite surface modification based on cathodic deposition (CD) plus hydrophobic treatment (HT) extended the discoloration time in droplet tests by nearly 25 fold, decreased the icorr (corrosion current density) by three orders of magnitude, and increased the characteristic impedance modulus at 0.1 Hz by nearly four orders of magnitude, indicating that the CD/HT composite surface modification could enhance the corrosion resistance of Mg alloy significantly.

1. Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) alloys, which are known as 21st century green engineering materials, are inexpensive and abundant and have the advantages of low density, good recyclability, strong electromagnetic shielding ability, and good biocompatibility [1,2]. Therefore, they are widely employed in the aerospace, vehicle, IT, electronics, and medical device industries [3]. Compared with other metal implant materials used clinically, Mg alloys have the following outstanding advantages: (a) excellent biocompatibility, mechanical compatibility and biodegradability; (b) a density similar to that of human bones; and (c) high specific strength and specific stiffness. However, Mg alloys have poor corrosion resistance and especially in the corrosive media containing chloride ion because of the destruction of the native oxide film at their surface. Therefore, surface modifications have been one of the most effective and economical techniques used to control the corrosion of Mg alloys.
Superhydrophobic surfaces have been widely studied and used in self-cleaning, antifreezing and low-viscosity applications, etc. The hydrophobicity can also improve the corrosion protection of metal materials significantly [4,5,6]. In order to improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys, it’s important to study their hydrophobic treatment (HT) [7]. Surface wettability, which refers to the ability of water to spread on solid surfaces, is an important indicator for evaluating hydrophobic properties. Generally, a surface with a water contact angle less than 90° is considered hydrophilic; a surface with a water contact angle between 90° and 150° is considered hydrophobic; and a surface with a water contact angle exceeding 150° is considered superhydrophobic [8,9]. The surface wettability is determined by its chemical composition and microstructure [10,11]. Major approaches to preparing superhydrophobic surfaces have included hydrothermal synthesis [12], sol-gel method [13], spray-coating [14], electroplating [15], and chemical etching [16], etc.
At present, superhydrophobic films/coatings at the surfaces of Mg alloys are generally obtained by the following steps: (a) manufacturing a rough surface structure at micro/nano scale and (b) reducing the surface free energy with low surface energy reagents, such as stearic acid, myristic acid and lauric acid [17,18,19]. In our previous work [20], in situ-grown, mesh-like, and rough Mg(OH)2 coatings were synthesized by cathodic deposition on pure Mg. It’s demonstrated that they could improve the corrosion resistance of pure Mg metal to some extent. In order to enhance the corrosion protection of Mg(OH)2 coatings prepared by cathodic deposition further, an ingenious method of modifying them to obtain superhydrophobicity is introduced and discussed in this paper.
In order to manufacture the Mg alloys with superhydrophobic surfaces, scholars have made fruitful endeavours. For example, Zhong et al. [21] reported the successful fabrication of superhydrophobic coatings (myristic calcium) on AZ31 Mg alloy with a contact angle of 157° via a simple one-step electrodeposition method. Zhang et al. [22] electrodeposited a hydrophobic calcium stearate coating onto an anodized Mg to decrease the degradation rate of the substrate in simulated body fluid. Gao et al. [23] fabricated a hierarchically structured szaibelyite film on AZ31 Mg alloy by means of template-free hydrothermal synthesis, and then modified the surface with fluoroalkyl silane (FAS); the resulting film became superhydrophobic, with a contact angle of 166° and a rolling angle of 5°. Liu et al. [24] modified Mg alloy by a composite process of nickel plating and stearic acid treatment to obtain superhydrophobic surfaces. Zhu et al. [25] found that superhydrophobic surfaces with a contact angle of 154° and a rolling angle of 6° were successfully synthesized on Mg alloy by a serial process of hydrochloric acid etching, ammonia immersion and subsequent stearic acid treatment. Han et al. [26] combined chemical etching with nichel sulfate and treatment with stearic acid to induce superhydrophobicity. Ishizaki and Sakamoto [27] fabricated color-tuned superhydrophobic surfaces by a chemical-free immersion process in ultrapure water and modification with n-octadecyltrimethoxysilane.
In this study, based on Mg(OH)2 coatings prepared by cathodic deposition, superhydrophobic surfaces were manufactured on ME20M Mg alloy using environmentally friendly, low-cost reagents. The effects of typical surface treatment, especially CD/HT composite modification, on the wettability and corrosion resistance of Mg alloy were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

As-rolling ME20M Mg alloy sheet was employed in this paper. Its main chemical composition was as follows: Mn 1.5%, Ce 0.3%, Al 0.01%, Fe 0.01%, Si 0.02%, La 0.003%, and balance Mg. The sizes of samples were 40 mm × 40 mm × 3 mm. Their surfaces were ground with SiC paper from 240 up to 1000 grit, rinsed with distilled water, ultrasonically degreased in ethyl alcohol and dried under a stream of hot air. Afterwards, the samples were measured with a Vernier caliper and weighed on an electronic analysis balance (B Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).
Mg(OH)2 coating was fabricated by cathodic deposition in an aqueous solution containing 25 g/L Mg(NO)3 and 1.5 mL/L H2O2 at 37 ± 1 °C employing a two-electrode system, where the distance between sample (working electrode) /graphite flake (counter electrode) was 3.0 cm. A programmable power supply (IT7000, ITECH, Zhubei, Taiwan, China) was employed and a pulse current was applied. The pulsing parameters were as follows: peak current density 1.6 mA/cm2, total power-on time 2700 s with a cycle of 5 s conduction and 0.03 s off. After cathodic deposition, the samples were rinsed in distilled water and dried using a stream of hot air. Then they were immersed into the ethanol solution of stearic acid for a certain time to modify. During immersion, the V/S ratio was kept to 5 mL/cm2, where V solution volume, S surface area of sample.
A contact angle instrument (OCA35, Dataphysics, Stuttgart, Germany) was employed. The static contact angle (SCA, advancing contact angles only) and sliding angle (SA) of distilled water droplets (5 μL) were measured five times at selected areas at the surface of sample. During test, the temperature and relative humidity were controlled at 25 °C and 65% RH, respectively.
Adhesion between coating and Mg substrate was assessed by tape test method. The classification of the adhesion test results according to ASTM D3359-2009 [28] was presented in Table 1.
The corrosion resistance of typical samples was studied by droplet test, total immersion corrosion test as well as PDP and EIS techniques. In the droplet test, 50 mg/L KMnO4 was used as the indicator, and 10 mL/L HNO3 (65 wt %) as the etchant. Five points were picked out at each typical surface to evaluate the average discoloration time. The total immersion corrosion test was performed at 37 °C for 48 h. The average corrosion rate was calculated by Equation (1):
v = 1000 × (m0 − m1)/S
where v is the average corrosion rate, mg/cm2; m0 is the original mass of the sample before the test, g; m1 is the mass of the sample after the test was finished and the corrosion products were removed, g; S is the working surface area of the sample, cm2.
Data on PDP curves and EIS were collected with an electrochemical workstation (Chenhua CHI604, Shanghai, China) employing a three-electrode system with sample as WE (Working Electrodes), saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as RE (Reference Electrode) and Pt sheet as AE (Auxiliary Electrode). The PDP tests were taken at a scanning rate of 0.5 mV/s. The EIS tests were performed at Ecorr from 100 kHz to 10 mHz at five frequency points per decade with 10 mV rms amplitude sinusoidal perturbing signal.
In the tests of total immersion corrosion, PDP and EIS, 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution aerated was employed as testing medium. The ratio of medium volume to working area of sample was 200 mL/cm2. The pH value of NaCl solution was adjusted to 7.00 using diluted NaOH or HCl solution. While electrochemical tests controlled remotely by a PC were running, the solution remained quiescent and its temperature was maintained at 30 ± 1 °C.
The micromorphologies of typical samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta 650, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The chemical compositions were examined with a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR; VERTEX 33, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using the KBr technique and X-ray diffractometer (XRD; D8 Advance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).
In this paper, all the solutions were prepared by using analytical grade reagents and distilled water. All the potentials were on SCE scale (ESCE = 0.2438 V vs ENHE).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Modifying Parameters

3.1.1. Concentration of stearic acid

In order to investigate the effect of the concentrations of stearic acid on the surface wettability of Mg alloy substrate, after preparing Mg(OH)2 coating by cathodic deposition, the samples were immersed into ethanol solutions of stearic acid at 80 °C for 1 h. The test results of SCA and SA (Figure 1) showed that with an increase in the content of stearic acid, the SCA first increased and then decreased almost linearly. When the concentration was 5 g/L, the SCA reached its maximum value 151.5°. With a further increase in the concentration, the surfaces of the samples were hydrophobic yet. But the SCAs decreased to less than 150°. It was confirmed that the Mg(OH)2 coating prepared by cathodic deposition could obtain superhydrophobicity after immersion in a low concentration stearic acid solution for a short period. All SAs were 1°, indicating that the concentration of stearic acid had no effect on the SAs in the concentration window studied and within the accuracy of testing instrument. Based on the above results, for the purpose of hydrophobic treatment of Mg(OH)2 coatings prepared by cathodic deposition, the optimal concentration of stearic acid was 5 g/L while using anhydrous ethanol as solvent .

3.1.2. Solution Temperature

Modification parameters were designed as follows in the single factor experiment: anhydrous ethanol as solvent, content of stearic acid 5 g/L, immersion time 1 h, solution temperature T as single variable. Prior to immersion modification, a thin coating of Mg(OH)2 was prefabricated at the surface of each sample by cathodic deposition. The variations of their surface hydrophobicity were presented in Figure 2. It’s obvious that the SCAs were affected very slightly. In the temperature window studied, they almost remained 150.0° stable. However, the T affected the SA strongly: the higher the former, the smaller the latter. The linear relationship between them was clearly evident and the fitted equation was as follows: SA = −0.1T + 9. Hence, the optimal solution temperature was 80 °C.

3.1.3. Treatment Time

Immersion time t was chosen as variable in the single factor experiment under the following conditions: 5 g/L stearic acid using anhydrous ethanol as solvent, solution temperature 80 °C. Test results shown in Figure 3 demonstrated that the SCA increased rapidly at the initial stage but then decreased slowly with the prolongation of time. The SCA increased almost linearly with the t. It took the samples only 10 minutes to realize surface hydrophobization. The peak value of 151.5° appeared after 1 h of immersion. When t was extended further, the SCA decreased slightly but remained greater than 150.0°. For the SA, it decreased linearly with time from 5° to 1°while t was less than 1 h. But it’s not affected by time any longer and stabilized at the level of 1° while t exceeded 1 h. The above relationship between wettability and t should be attributed to the different proceeding of self-assembly.

3.2. Corrosion Protection

The Mg alloy sample ground only was denoted as Blank sample. The sample modified by stearic acid further was denoted as Blank + HT (Hydrophobic Treatment) sample. The sample prepared by cathodic deposition was denoted as CD sample. The CD sample modified by stearic acid further was denoted as CD + HT sample. The hydrophobic treatment was performed under the optimal conditions: ethanol solution of stearic acid solution of 5 g/L at 80 °C for 1 h.

3.2.1. Droplet Test

The results of droplet test shown in Table 2 indicated that hydrophobic treatment could effectively improve the corrosion resistance of the Mg alloy, including the Blank sample. For the Blank sample, the discoloration time of corrosive droplet increased more than twofold. However, its increase was far less than those observed for the CD and CD + HT samples. The discoloration time for the CD + HT sample was twice that of the CD sample and was approximately eight times that of the Blank + HT sample. Obviously, surface modification of Mg(OH)2 coatings prepared by cathodic deposition with stearic acid could improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloy significantly.

3.2.2. Total Immersion Corrosion Test

Figure 4 presented the results of total immersion corrosion test in which 3.5 wt % NaCl solution with pH 7.0 was employed as testing medium at 37 °C for 48 h. Although single CD or HT could inhibit the corrosion of Mg alloy substrate to some extent, CD/HT composite modification was the most effective. Actually, the obtained average corrosion rate υ corresponding to CD + HT sample was 1.2 mg/cm2, which decreased by 52% compared with the Blank sample. The above results further confirmed that surface modification of the Mg(OH)2 coatings prepared by cathodic deposition could improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloy significantly.

3.2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Figure 5 showed the PDP curves of the typical samples. Table 3 listed the fitting results of the corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (icorr). In terms of icorr, the variation trend of corrosion resistance was basically consistent with the results from the droplet test. The icorr of the CD + HT sample was 6.2955 × 10−3 μA/cm2, which was three orders of magnitude smaller than those of the Blank and CD samples. In addition, even for the Blank sample, its icorr decreased to approximately 45% after hydrophobic treatment. Noticeably, the decrease was far less than that of the CD + HT sample.
Figure 6 presented the Nyquist plots for typical samples from the EIS tests. Table 4 showed the characteristic impedance modulus at 0.1 Hz, |Z|0.1 Hz. The spectra of the samples other than the Blank sample showed typical double-arc structures. In addition, the radius of the impedance arc of the CD + HT sample was much larger than that of the other samples. The |Z|0.1 Hz of the CD or Blank + HT samples were increased by only one order of magnitude respectively compared with that of the Blank sample. However, the |Z|0.1 Hz of the CD + HT sample, 1.45 × 106 Ω·cm2, was three orders of magnitude greater than those of the CD and Blank + HT samples and four orders of magnitude greater than that of the Blank sample. These results were consistent with the droplet and PDP test results and confirmed further that surface modification of the Mg(OH)2 coatings prepared by cathodic deposition could improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloy significantly.

3.3. Surface Wettability

Figure 7 illustrated distilled water droplets on the surfaces of typical samples and presented the SCA results. The SCA of the Blank sample was only 88.0° (Figure 7a), implying that metallographic grinding treatment could produce hydrophilic surface on Mg alloy substrate. The Mg(OH)2 coating prepared by cathodic deposition was superhydrophilic, with a contact angle of barely 15.5° (Figure 7b). A comparison between Figure 7a,c indicated that even the Blank sample could obtain hydrophobicity after simple immersion in ethanol solution of stearic acid. However, the modification effect based on Blank sample was far less than that based on CD sample. After modification by stearic acid, the surface of CD sample became superhydrophobic with a 151.5° SCA (Figure 7d), which was nearly 31% higher than that of the Blank + HT sample and almost 8.8 times higher than that before hydrophobic treatment.
According to the Cassie-Baxter equation (Equation (2)):
cos θr = f1 cos θ1 − f2
where f1 is the contact area fraction of the water droplet with the solid surface, f2 is the contact area fraction of the water droplet with the air, and f1 + f2 = 1. θr is the contact angle of the water droplet on the rough surface. θ1 is the intrinsic contact angle of the water droplet on the smooth surface.
Herein, for the CD + HT sample, θr was 151.5° and θ1 was the contact angle of the water droplet on the surface of the smooth Mg alloy modified with stearic acid, that is, the surface contact angle of the Blank + HT sample, namely 116°. After calculation, f1 was 21.6% and f2 was 78.4%, which demonstrated that the air bubbles in the rough structure of the superhydrophobic surface could effectively inhibit the direct contact of the water droplets with the substrate.

3.4. Coating Adhesion

Table 5 listed the adhesion test results according to ASTM D3359-2009 for the CD and CD + HT samples. It’s obvious that the coating/substrate adhesion levels under two treatment conditions were both 5B, implying that after hydrophobic treatment, the Mg(OH)2 coating still closely adhered to the substrate.

3.5. Micromorphology

Figure 8 showed the surface micromorphologies of the CD and CD + HT samples at different magnifications. As illustrated, the surface the CD (Figure 8a,b) sample had complex blade-like micro-structure, similar to that of the CD + HT sample (Figure 8c,d), with different micro/nano scale sizes ranging from 300 nm to 3 μm. This kind of structure could create a large number of voids with low surface energy reagents and effectively capture air to form air bubbles, which could inhibit the surface to contact with water and corrosive fluids. Therefore, the surface of the Mg substrate was modified to obtain superhydrophobictiy and its corrosion resistance was improved.
Note that even though they have similar micromorphologies, the CD sample was hydrophilic, whereas the CD + HT sample was superhydrophobic according to the results in Section 3.3. The difference was that the surface of the CD sample had not been treated with stearic acid and therefore did not exhibit superhydrophobicity. In addition, even though it had been treated with stearic acid, the Blank sample was not superhydrophobic because of the absence of cathodic deposition. Based on the above results, it was concluded that only CD/HT composite surface modification could realize surface superhydrophobization.

3.6. Chemical Composition

Figure 9 showed the XRD results for the typical Mg alloy samples. It’s obvious that the main phase composition of coatings was Mg(OH)2. Compared with the XRD pattern of the CD sample, that of the CD + HT sample did not show a new diffraction peak, which should be attributed to the trace and/or amorphous new products.
To further characterize the chemical composition of the coatings, infrared spectrophotometer was employed. The results shown in Figure 10 demonstrated that new absorption peaks at 2920 and 2848 cm−1 and indicated the presence of –CH2– based on the standard infrared spectrum of stearic acid. These peaks suggested that stearic acid had reacted with Mg(OH)2 coating prepared by cathodic deposition.

4. Conclusions

In summary, superhydrophobic and highly corrosion resistant surfaces were manufactured by surface modification of Mg(OH)2 coating prepared by cathodic deposition with ethanol solution of stearic acid. The following conclusions are drawn:
  • Superhydrophobic surface with admirable 151.5° water static contact angle and 1° rolling angle could be obtained on Mg alloy substrate by CD + HT composite treatment in which Mg(OH)2 film was prepared by cathodic deposition firstly and then a simple immersion was done in a low-concentration ethanol solution of stearic acid for a short period. The optimal surface modifying parameters were 5 g/L of stearic acid at 80 °C for 1 h of immersion.
  • Only CD/HT composite modification could realize surface superhydrophobization of Mg alloy, whereas single cathodic deposition or single hydrophobic treatment could not.
  • SEM observation showed that Mg(OH)2 coating modified by stearic acid consisted of blade-like structures with micro/nano scale sizes. This kind of micro/nano structures were interlaced to form a large number of voids, which effectively inhibited surface contact with water and fluids and significantly improved the corrosion resistance of Mg alloy.
  • The FT-IR spectrum test results showed that new –CH2– peaks appeared in the infrared spectrum of the CD + HT sample, indicating that stearic acid had reacted with the Mg(OH)2 film in a self-assembled or chemically bonded manner.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and H.C.; Software, Z.W. and H.H.; Validation, H.C., Z.W. and H.H.; Formal Analysis, Y.Z.; Investigation, H.C. and Z.W.; Resources, Y.Z.; Data curation, H.C. and H.H.; Writing—original draft preparation, H.C.; Writing—review and editing, Y.Z., Z.W. and H.H.; Supervision, Y.Z.; Project Administration, Y.Z. and H.H.; Funding Acquisition, Y.Z.

Funding

Projects supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51533003) and CRRC Dalian Institute Co., Ltd. (2018440002000988).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Z.W.; Li, Q.; She, Z.X.; Chen, F.N.; Li, L.Q.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhang, P. Facile and fast fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on magnesium alloy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 271, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Song, G.L. Corrosion and Protection of Mg Alloy, 1st ed.; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2006. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Xi, T.F.; Zheng, Y.F. Current situation and development and tendency of interventional medical device. Mater. China 2010, 29, 17–26. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Tan, Y. An overview of techniques for characterizing in homogeneities in organic surface films and under film localized corrosion. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, P.S.; Sundaramurthy, J.; Zhang, X.; Mangalaraj, D.; Thavasi, V.; Ramakrishna, S. Superhydrophobic and antireflecting behavior of densely packed and size controlled ZnO nanorods. J. Alloy. Compd. 2013, 553, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qian, H.C.; Li, H.Y.; Zhang, D.W. Research progress of superhydrophobic surface technologies in the field of corrosion protection. Surf. Technol. 2015, 44, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  7. Celia, E.; Darmanin, T.; Givenchy, E.T.; Amigoni, S.; Guittard, F. Recent advances in designing superhydrophobic surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 402, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Darmanin, T.; Guittard, F. Recent advances in the potential applications of bioinspired superhydrophobic materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16319–16359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, J.L.; Lu, Y.; Huang, S.; Liu, X.; Wu, L.B.; Xu, W.J. A simple immersion approach for fabricating superhydrophobic Mg alloy surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 266, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Q.; Cao, K.; Chen, F.M. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on metallic substrate by pulse Cu electroplating and silver plating. China Surf. Eng. 2015, 28, 1–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, W.; Lu, P.; Qian, L. Fabrication of superhydrophobic paper surface via wax mixture coating. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 250, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, M.; Pang, X.; Wei, L.; Gao, K. Insitu grown superhydrophobic Zn-Al layered double hydroxides films on magnesium alloy to improve corrosion properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 337, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shirtcliffe, N.J.; McHale, G.; Newton, M.I.; Perry, C.C. Intrinsically superhydrophobic organosilica sol-gel foams. Langmuir 2003, 19, 5626–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Men, X.; Xu, X.; Zhu, X. Reversible superhydrobicity to superhydrophilicity switching of a carbon nanotube film via alternation of UV irradiation and dark storage. Langmuir 2010, 26, 10198–10202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xi, W.; Qiao, Z.; Zhu, C.; Jia, A.; Li, M. The preparation of lotus-like super-hydrophobic copper surfaces by electroplating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4836–4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chu, F.; Wu, X. Fabrication and condensation characteristics of metallic superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical micro-nano structures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 371, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, H.M.; Wang, T. Preparation and hydrophobic properties of the micro-nano structure of butterfly wing surface. China Surf. Eng. 2014, 27, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, Z.; Hao, L.; Chen, C. A fast electrodeposition method for fabrication of lanthanum superhydrophobic surface with hierarchical micro-nanostructures. Colloids Surf. A. 2012, 401, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Y.; Sarkar, D.K.; Grant Chen, X. Superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces prepared by chemical etching process and their corrosion resistance properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jia, S.G. Study on cathodic deposition of Mg(OH)2 for surface modification of Mg alloy. Master’s Thesis, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhong, Y.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, S. The one-step electroposition of superhydrophobic surface on AZ31 magnesium alloy and its time-dependence corrosion resistance in NaCl solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Tang, S.; Hu, J.; Lin, T. Formation mechanism and corrosion resistance of the hydrophobic coating on anodized magnesium. Corros. Sci. 2016, 111, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, R.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, L. Fabrication of fibrous szaibelyite with hierarchical structure superhydrophobic coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy for corrosion protection. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 241, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Yin, X.; Zhang, J. An electro-deposition process for fabrication of biomimetic super-hydrophobic surface and its corrosion resistance on Mg alloy. Electrochem. Acta 2014, 125, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, Y.L.; Fan, W.B.; Feng, L.B. Anti-adhesion and corrosion resistance of superhydrophobic Mg alloy surface. J. Mater. Eng. 2016, 44, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  26. Han, M.; Go, S.; Ahn, Y. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on magnesium substrate by chemical etching. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 1363–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ishizaki, T.; Sakamoto, M. Facile formation of biomimetic color-tuned superhydrophobic magnesium alloy with corrosion resistance. Langmuir 2011, 27, 2375–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ASTM D3359–09 Standard Test Methods for Measuring Adhesion by Tape Test; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.
Coatings 09 00477 g001 550
Figure 1. Variations of SCAs, SAs with the concentration of stearic acid.
Figure 1. Variations of SCAs, SAs with the concentration of stearic acid.
Coatings 09 00477 g001
Coatings 09 00477 g002 550
Figure 2. Variations of SCAs, SAs with solution temperature.
Figure 2. Variations of SCAs, SAs with solution temperature.
Coatings 09 00477 g002
Coatings 09 00477 g003 550
Figure 3. Relationship between SCAs, SAs and immersion time.
Figure 3. Relationship between SCAs, SAs and immersion time.
Coatings 09 00477 g003
Coatings 09 00477 g004 550
Figure 4. Average corrosion rate of Mg alloy samples in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution with pH 7.0 at 37 °C for 48 h.
Figure 4. Average corrosion rate of Mg alloy samples in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution with pH 7.0 at 37 °C for 48 h.
Coatings 09 00477 g004
Coatings 09 00477 g005 550
Figure 5. Potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) curves for typical samples in 3.5 wt % NaCl solutions.
Figure 5. Potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) curves for typical samples in 3.5 wt % NaCl solutions.
Coatings 09 00477 g005
Coatings 09 00477 g006 550
Figure 6. Nyquist plots for typical samples in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution.
Figure 6. Nyquist plots for typical samples in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution.
Coatings 09 00477 g006
Coatings 09 00477 g007 550
Figure 7. Images of distilled water droplets and the contact angle results (inset) of typical samples: (a) Blank: 88°; (b) CD: 15.5°; (c) Blank + HT: 116°; (d) CD + HT: 151.5°.
Figure 7. Images of distilled water droplets and the contact angle results (inset) of typical samples: (a) Blank: 88°; (b) CD: 15.5°; (c) Blank + HT: 116°; (d) CD + HT: 151.5°.
Coatings 09 00477 g007
Coatings 09 00477 g008a 550Coatings 09 00477 g008b 550
Figure 8. Surface scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of typical samples: (a) CD: 2,000×; (b) CD: 10,000×; (c) CD + HT: 2,000×; (d) CD + HT: 10,000×.
Figure 8. Surface scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of typical samples: (a) CD: 2,000×; (b) CD: 10,000×; (c) CD + HT: 2,000×; (d) CD + HT: 10,000×.
Coatings 09 00477 g008aCoatings 09 00477 g008b
Coatings 09 00477 g009 550
Figure 9. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) spectra of typical samples: (a) CD + HT; (b) CD.
Figure 9. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) spectra of typical samples: (a) CD + HT; (b) CD.
Coatings 09 00477 g009
Coatings 09 00477 g010 550
Figure 10. Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) spectra of typical sample surfaces: (a) CD + HT; (b) CD.
Figure 10. Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) spectra of typical sample surfaces: (a) CD + HT; (b) CD.
Coatings 09 00477 g010
Table
Table 1. Classification of adhesion test results.
Table 1. Classification of adhesion test results.
Percent Area Removed0%Less Than 5%5%–15%15%–35%35%–65%Greater Than 65%
Classification5B4B3B2B1B0B
Table
Table 2. Discoloration time of corrosive droplets on typical samples.
Table 2. Discoloration time of corrosive droplets on typical samples.
SampleBlankCDBlank + HTCD + HT
Discoloration time, s40 550 134 1037
Table
Table 3. Relevant electrochemical parameters from the polarization curves.
Table 3. Relevant electrochemical parameters from the polarization curves.
SampleEcorr (V)icorr (μA/cm2)
Blank−1.56755.3660
CD−1.57482.5588
Blank + HT−1.60492.4051
CD + HT−1.62406.2955 × 10−3
Table
Table 4. |Z|0.1 Hz for typical samples, Ω·cm2
Table 4. |Z|0.1 Hz for typical samples, Ω·cm2
SampleBlankCDBlank + HTCD + HT
|Z|0.1 Hz4.66 × 1024.14 × 1033.18 × 1031.45 × 106
Table
Table 5. Adhesion test results of typical samples.
Table 5. Adhesion test results of typical samples.
SampleRatio of Film SpallingAdhesion LevelImage of Film Spalling
CD0%5B Coatings 09 00477 i001
CD + HT0%5B Coatings 09 00477 i002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Cao, H.; Huang, H.; Wang, Z. Hydrophobic Modification of Magnesium Hydroxide Coating Deposited Cathodically on Magnesium Alloy and its Corrosion Protection. Coatings 2019, 9, 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080477

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Cao H, Huang H, Wang Z. Hydrophobic Modification of Magnesium Hydroxide Coating Deposited Cathodically on Magnesium Alloy and its Corrosion Protection. Coatings. 2019; 9(8):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yongjun, Hui Cao, Hanxiong Huang, and Zhiping Wang. 2019. "Hydrophobic Modification of Magnesium Hydroxide Coating Deposited Cathodically on Magnesium Alloy and its Corrosion Protection" Coatings 9, no. 8: 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080477

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop