Next Article in Journal
Research on Multi-Orbital Scanning Laser Bending Process of Polyvinyl Chloride Sheets
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation of Desulfurized Rubber Powder and Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene Composite-Modified Asphalt
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Rammed Earth Wall Erosion in Traditional Village Dwellings in Zhuhai City
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anti-Erosion Mechanism of Biological Crusts and Eco-Protection Technology Using Composite Biofilms for Traditional Rammed Earth Dwellings in Songyang County

1
Center for Cultural Heritage Studies, School of Art and Archaeology, Hangzhou City University, No. 51 Huzhou Street, Gongshu District, Hangzhou 310015, China
2
Hangzhou Animation & Game College, Hangzhou Vocational & Technical College, No. 68 Xueyuan Street, 17 Xiasha Higher Education Park, Qiantang District, Hangzhou 314423, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(5), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15050608
Submission received: 18 April 2025 / Revised: 10 May 2025 / Accepted: 17 May 2025 / Published: 20 May 2025

Abstract

:
A typical county for traditional village conservation in China is Songyang County. It is renowned for its ancient rammed earth dwellings, which exhibit a unique microclimate and possess significant historical value. However, high precipitation and acid rain under the subtropical monsoon climate have caused severe surface erosion, including cracking and spalling. This study focuses on traditional rammed earth dwellings in Chenjiapeng Village, Songyang County, combining field surveys, experimental analysis, and microscopic characterization to systematically investigate erosion mechanisms and protection strategies. Techniques, such as drone aerial photography, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and microbial diversity detection, were employed to elucidate the anti-erosion mechanisms of gray–green biological crusts on rammed earth surfaces. The results indicate that algal crusts enhance surface compressive strength and shear resistance through macroscopic coverage (reducing raindrop kinetic energy and moisture retention) and microscopic extracellular polysaccharide-cemented soil particles forming a three-dimensional network. However, acidic environments induce metabolic acid release from algae, dissolving cementing materials and creating a “surface protection-internal damage” paradox. To address this, a “transparent film-biofiber-acid inhibition layer” composite biofilm design is proposed, integrating a biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) mesh, algal attachment substrates, and calcium carbonate microparticles to dynamically neutralize acidic substances, achieving synergistic ecological protection and cultural heritage authenticity. This study provides innovative solutions for the anti-erosion protection of traditional rammed earth structures, emphasizing environmental compatibility and sustainability.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rammed earth architecture, as the crystallization of China’s traditional construction techniques that have lasted for thousands of years, carries important historical and cultural memories [1]. The production techniques of rammed earth architecture are relatively complicated and are divided into two stages, namely soil preparation and ramming. The ramming stage is further divided into substages, such as soil dumping, ramming, layer-by-layer ramming, maintenance, mold removal, wall beautification, and wall solidification [2] (Figure 1). After going through these steps repeatedly, a solid and stable rammed earth wall can be completed. Songyang County is located in the hilly area of southwestern Zhejiang and was built in the fourth year of the Jian’an era of the Eastern Han Dynasty (199 AD), with a history of over 1800 years [3]. Today, Songyang County is a demonstration county for the protection of Chinese traditional villages, and its number has long been among the top in the country. Up to now, a total of 78 villages have been listed in the Chinese Traditional Village List (data cover the first to the seventh batches), accounting for nearly one-fourth of the total in Zhejiang Province, and the county is known as the “county sample of classical China”. It is noteworthy that a large number of traditional rammed earth dwellings have been preserved in these villages. The wall thickness of these buildings is generally between 40–60 cm, forming a unique microclimate regulation system. At the same time, the biggest advantage of rammed earth is its small thermal conductivity coefficient and good thermal inertia, which creates the characteristic of warmth in winter and a cool interior in summer for rammed earth architecture, making it a valuable treasure in the history of human architectural development [4]. However, influenced by the subtropical monsoon climate, the regional annual average precipitation exceeds 1800 mm. Meanwhile, with the rapid advancement of national industrialization under the background of a coal-dominated energy structure, the sharp increase in the number of coal-fired power plants, heavy industrial bases, and motor vehicle ownership has led to a continuous rise in emissions of acidic gases, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. This has resulted in frequent acid rain occurrences, causing pathological phenomena, such as cracking and flaky spalling on the surface of rammed earth. According to research, in the past decade, some rammed earth buildings in Songyang County have shown significant structural damage due to environmental erosion. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the research on the anti-erosion properties of rammed earth dwellings.
Traditional villages carry the excellent traditional culture of China and are an important link in the protection of our national culture [5]. Songyang County currently has 96 traditional Chinese villages, making it one of the counties in East China with the most traditional villages and the most abundant styles [6], and it has high research and protection value. Chinese scholars have conducted extensive research on rural areas in the past, mainly focusing on economic issues related to economic crops in these areas [7,8,9,10]. With the promotion of the rural revitalization strategy, there have been considerable achievements in the research into these issues. However, the protection of the ancient residential heritage of traditional villages is also worthy of our attention. Among them, traditional rammed earth dwellings, as one of the most typical types of dwellings [11], are widely used in traditional Chinese villages. In the process of historical evolution and inheritance, they have continuously adapted to the environment, forming a distinct and unique rammed earth culture [12,13]. However, with the passage of time, many young laborers have migrated out, leaving only elderly people living alone, which leads to the inability for ancient rammed earth dwellings to receive timely repairs and maintenance. In addition to natural environmental erosion, many ancient rammed earth dwellings have been damaged. In recent years, relevant scholars have carried out research in this regard, exploring the reasons for the erosion of rammed earth materials.
Some scholars have noticed that wind and rain erosion damage of rammed earth materials involves the physical wear and tear of the structure, which is the main form of damage to rammed earth walls. Under the condition of continuous loss of rammed earth materials, the cross-section of the wall becomes smaller and smaller, resulting in the continuous decline of the bearing capacity of the rammed earth structure [14] and leading to in structural instability and other problems of the building. Some scholars have also analyzed the causes of the erosion of rammed earth materials from a biological point of view, such as the root spread of plants in rammed earth materials during the growth process, which will cause cracks in rammed earth [15]. In addition, the erosion of rammed earth by plant litter will change the composition and structure of rammed earth, thus threatening the preservation of ancient dwellings [16].
In the research into the erosion resistance of rammed earth, scholars at home and abroad start from different angles to improve the erosion resistance of rammed earth materials. These angles are mainly divided into physical modification and chemical modification: some scholars choose common admixtures, such as cement and lime, to improve the erosion resistance of rammed earth [17]. In addition, some scholars have added plant fibers (coconut fiber, sisal fiber, sargassum seaweed fiber, etc.) to enhance the crack resistance and durability of rammed earth [18,19,20,21,22].
In addition to this physical and chemical modification, it has also been found that the use of microorganisms to induce calcium carbonate precipitation has increased the water resistance of rammed earth, resulting in cracking repairs (autogenous healing) [23,24], and that algae can form complexes through its photosynthetic metabolites, thereby enhancing the erosion resistance of the surface layer of rammed earth [25]. The authors believe that this method has the advantages of high ecological compatibility, endogenous self-healing function, and low environmental disturbance, but most of the current studies have not designed a scheme for the erosion resistance and crack resistance of the overall walls of rammed earth structures.
Therefore, this study took the traditional rammed-earth residential buildings in Chenjiapu Village, Songyang County, Zhejiang Province (which is a typical example of 78 villages in Songyang County that are included in the list of traditional Chinese villages and which is known as “villages on the cliff”), and systematically carried out research into the erosion and protection mechanisms of rammed earth buildings by combining field investigation, experimental analysis, and microscopic characterization research. First of all, through field investigation and drone aerial photography, researchers conducted a defects survey of representative ancient rammed earth residential buildings in Songyang County and recorded the cracks and eroded surface problems in detail. In terms of microscopic mechanism research, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and microbial diversity detection were used to show that microbial communities and algae have a certain protective effect on the surface layer of rammed earth. Based on this comprehensive research, this analysis proposes a design for the protection of “eroded rammed earth walls and rammed earth with cracks”. Specifically, this design is a transparent film–biocellulose–acid inhibition layer composite biofilm scheme. This provides an innovative solution for the protection of traditional rammed earth buildings.

2. Materials and Research Process

2.1. Study Area: Songyang Ancient Village in Lishui

Songyang County is located in the southwest of Zhejiang Province (Figure 2), at the junction of Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangxi provinces, with geographical coordinates of 28°14′ to 28°36′ north latitude and 119°10′ to 119°42′ east longitude. The central basin is called “Songgu Plain” because of its openness and flatness, and is also called “Songgu Basin”. It preserves a complete local cultural context and has simple mountain characteristics in southwest Zhejiang [26]. Lishui City, where this area is located, has a subtropical monsoon climate, with four pronounced seasons, abundant sunshine, and abundant rainfall. The wind speed in Lishui varies significantly throughout the year, and the wind speed is higher in summer (June–August), especially in July and August, when the wind speed frequently reaches 3–4 m/s. In winter (December to February), the wind speed is relatively low, generally ranging from 1 to 2 m/s. Its temperature changes obviously throughout the year, and the temperature is higher in summer (June–August), usually between 25–35 °C, especially in July and August, when the temperature frequently reaches above 35 °C. In winter (December–February of the following year), the temperature is low, usually between 0–10 °C. High temperatures in summer and cold and humid conditions in winter are the main temperature characteristics. At the same time, the direct radiation in Lishui varies significant throughout the year, and the radiation intensity is higher in summer (June–August), especially in July and August, when the solar radiation intensity frequently reaches 600–800 Wh/m2. In winter (December–February of the following year), the solar radiation intensity is low, usually between 200 and 400 Wh/m2—(Figure 3).
Songyang County in Lishui City, with its unique geographical environment and climatic conditions, preserves a large number of ancient villages and rammed earth residential buildings with characteristics of the mountainous areas in southwestern Zhejiang. These buildings are not only important carriers of local folk culture but also valuable resources for studying the anti-erosion performance of rammed earth buildings. However, due to the significant changes in annual solar radiation and precipitation, the long-term preservation of rammed earth residential buildings is unfavorable, and erosion is prone to occurring. For example, high humidity and frequent precipitation in summer can cause the rammed earth walls to absorb water and expand, and the long-term wet expansion and dry shrinkage cycle will accelerate the cracking and peeling of the walls [27]. At the same time, higher wind speeds in summer will also accelerate the evaporation of moisture on the surface of the walls, leading to dry and cracked wall surfaces. Over time, the stability of rammed earth residential buildings is greatly reduced [28]. In recent years, with the enhanced awareness of traditional village protection, the ancient villages in Songyang County have gradually received attention from the academic community and the government. Therefore, this study selects Chenjiapu Village in Songyang County as the research area (Figure 4).
In recent years, with the growing awareness of protecting traditional villages, the ancient villages in Songyang County have drawn increasing attention from academia and the government. Chenjiapu Village, Songyang County, has many rammed earth dwellings and ancestral hall relics. This study selected Chenjiapu Village in Songyang County as the study area (Figure 4). This choice not only helps us deeply understand the anti-erosion mechanisms of traditional rammed earth buildings but also offers a scientific basis for the conservation and restoration of ancient villages.

2.2. Field Investigation and Sample Collection

Because the terrain of ancient villages in Songyang County is complex, and the buildings are mostly built according to the mountains (Figure 5), the researchers chose to use a DJI Mini 4K, a consumer-grade drone with stability and flexible handling, to perform aerial photography tasks. The UAV is equipped with a high-definition camera and a three-axis mechanical pan/tilt system, which can keep the picture stable in complex environments. It is equipped with 1/2. A 3-inch CMOS sensor supports shooting 12-megapixel photos and 4K/30fps video. Enhanced Wi-Fi tech enables long-distance real-time HD image transmission. Regarding parameter configuration, the researchers synthesized the suggestions of several aerial photography experts and optimized the default settings of UAVs. The researchers set the ISO value of the camera to automatic mode to dynamically adapt to the complex environment of light and shadow interlacing in ancient villages (such as patio shadow and roof intense light). At the same time, according to the cloudy and sunny weather conditions on that day, the researchers fixed the aperture to f/2.8. Researchers set the shutter speed to 1/80 s to 1/2000 s for dynamic adjustment to avoid the overexposure of highlights. Finally, the researchers chose to shoot at 2 pm on 20 December 2024. During implementation, the UAV’s flying height was kept at 12–18 m. For the damaged rammed earth residential wall, the shooting distance was reduced to 2–4 m.
The traditional earthen wall construction in the Songyang area is usually rammed using the long-slab rafter construction method. Based on this method, the size of the rammed block of the formed earth wall is larger, generally about 1.8 m in height and 1.5 m in length (the specific size can be adjusted according to the actual situation). These large-size rammed blocks are combined with small, staggered masonry, so that there are certain gaps in the earthen wall structure. These gaps not only function as expansion joints but also have a certain structural rationality and can adapt to the natural deformation of the material. However, in the actual use process, due to factors, such as foundation settlement, camber of blocks, improper construction technology, or later maintenance loss, these gaps may gradually expand, which will adversely affect the earth wall structure. Specifically, gap enlargement may cause the following problems: loss of structural stability (the expansion of the gap may lead to uneven settlement of the overall structure of the earth wall, thereby weakening the stability of the structure); increased risk of rainwater infiltration (when a gap expands, rainwater may penetrate into the wall through the gap, causing the soil to soften and further exacerbate the damage to the wall); reduced strength (the widening of the gap may weaken the shear and compressive resistance of the soil wall, reducing its load-bearing capacity); appearance damage: the obvious enlargement of the gap will affect the appearance integrity of the earthen wall, reducing its historical and cultural value.
During the field trip, the researchers found that the residential house at No. 22 Chenjiapu West Road has some typical problems. These included the following: (1) erosion and recessing, mostly at the turning point of the rammed earth wall interface, with an average depth of 5–7 cm (Figure 6(bA)); (2) cracks in the wall (Figure 6(bB)); and (3) obvious traces of water erosion (Figure 6(bC)). At the same time, researchers found that the west wall of the house was less eroded, and the rammed earth wall was grayish–green. The same is true of the other three parts of the wall with a gray–green surface, which makes us curious about their peculiarities.
Based on the aforementioned research background, this study conducted systematic sampling of rammed earth walls exhibiting grayish–green surface crust characteristics on four facades (eastern, northern, southern, and western) of the target vernacular dwelling. Using archaeological scalpels, researchers performed stratified scraping along the normal line direction of wall surfaces to collect crust layer powders, with the sampling depth strictly controlled at 10 ± 0.5 mm and individual sample mass was precisely maintained at 10 ± 0.2 g (Figure 7). The samples were coded by orientation as A1 (east), A2 (north), A3 (south), and A4 (west). A dual-sealing preservation protocol was implemented, as follows: primary containment involved sealing compacted earth powders in inert PVC tubes (φ25 × 100 mm), followed by secondary packaging in anti-static aluminum foil bags, effectively isolating environmental contaminants and suppressing moisture exchange. The time interval between sampling completion and laboratory characterization was rigorously limited to 48 h to ensure that test data accurately reflect material behavioral characteristics under in situ environmental conditions. Notably, the research team uniformly applied a specialized glutinous rice glue interface agent for rammed earth walls to the damaged areas incurred during the investigation. The surface was then dyed using a mixture of loess slurry and natural mineral pigments to ensure consistency with the surrounding rammed earth matrix. Finally, a toothed trowel was employed to replicate the original wall texture, with particular emphasis on restoring the horizontal textural characteristics between rammed layers, thereby preserving the visual continuity of the wall structure.
Before the sampling work was implemented, researchers had preliminary contact with the owner of the house, systematically explaining the research objectives and work procedures. After on-site communication and confirmation, it was found that the building is currently vacant, effectively avoiding potential interference risks from recent human activities to the rammed earth walls. After obtaining verbal authorization from the property owner in accordance with the law, our team conducted a systematic investigation and sampling work on the historical building in accordance with the technical specifications for cultural heritage protection.

2.3. Research Methods and Processes

To elucidate the synergistic interaction mechanisms between rammed earth substrates and algal microbial communities in erosion resistance and crack suppression within the gray–green wall coating system described in Section 2.2, this investigation employed a multidisciplinary experimental approach combining microbial community diversity analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD) phase characterization, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microstructural observation. All o these investigations were carried out using four sets of 10 ± 0.2 g samples.
During the sample preparation process, the rammed earth powder was not subjected to chemical fixation treatment. Since the sample is a complex of inorganic minerals and microorganisms, the integrity of the microstructure can be maintained by directly collecting the sample while avoiding physical damage. After collection, the sample was naturally dried at room temperature for 48 h to ensure complete dehydration and avoid the interference of moisture in a vacuum environment. Subsequently, the sample was sputter-coated with a gold–palladium alloy (Au-Pd, 60:40 ratio), and the coating thickness was 15 nm.

2.3.1. Detection of the Microbial Community Diversity Composition Spectrum

Microbial community diversity detection was used to analyze the microbial community composition on the surface of rammed earth walls. The testing process included total microbiome DNA extraction, PCR amplification of target fragments, magnetic bead purification and recovery of amplification products, fluorescence quantification of amplification products, sequencing library preparation (sequencing libraries were prepared using Illumina’s TruSeq Nano DNA LT Library Prep Kit), and high-throughput sequencing. Microbial community diversity detection determines the main microbial species and their relative abundance on rammed earth walls. This offers essential data for understanding microorganisms’ role in the erosion process. The complete flow of bioinformatics analysis is shown in Figure 8.
In this study, the Illumina paired-end sequencing platform (MiSeq/NovaSeq) was employed to conduct amplification sequencing targeting the V3-V4 variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The primer design was based on the conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene, and universal primer pairs, namely 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′), were used. Moreover, based on the conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene, the V3-V4 hypervariable regions (~470 bp) could be specifically amplified. Meanwhile, in this study, an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) was used to describe the microbial community diversity.

2.3.2. XRD Test

Samples for XRD testing were collected from rammed earth walls in the east, west, north, and south directions. The thickness of each sample was 10 mm and the weight was about 10 g. The detection instrument used was the SmartLab high-resolution the X-ray diffractometer produced by Rikaku Co., Ltd. of Akishima, Japan, with the reference standard being SY/T 5163-2018 “X-ray Diffraction Analysis Method for Clay Minerals and Common Non-clay Minerals in Sedimentary Rocks”. XRD testing identifies the main minerals in rammed earth (such as quartz, feldspar, calcite, montmorillonite, etc.) through X-ray diffraction patterns, clarifying their crystal structure and relative content. The type of mineral directly affects the soil’s pH value, porosity, ion exchange capacity, and other factors that determine the colonization environment of microorganisms and algae.

2.3.3. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Testing

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) testing was used to study the chemical elements and the microstructure of four different samples to determine the growth and morphology of algae on the surface of the rammed earth. The instrument used was a ZEISS Gemini SEM 360(Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) with a magnification range of 500 to 5000×. In this study, the test parameters were carefully set to balance the requirements of resolution and sample protection. A low accelerating voltage of 1.5 kV was selected to minimize damage to organic components, such as algal extracellular polysaccharides, caused by the electron beam. The working distance was set to 6.5 mm to optimize the collection efficiency of the secondary electron signals and imaging clarity. An in-lens secondary electron detector was chosen for signal detection.

3. Data Analysis

3.1. Analysis of the Microbial Diversity Detection Data

The microbial community diversity results of the four samples (Figure 9a) show that Sample 4 is dominated by cyanobacteria, actinomycetes, and α-proteobacteria. This indicates that the gray–green crust layer of the rammed earth wall is a composite crust layer dominated by algae and supplemented by fungi. It is worth noting that the raw sequencing data (raw reads) of all samples averaged approximately 134,030 reads per sample, with the specific distribution as follows: A1 (128,762 reads), A2 (143,257 reads), A3 (141,631 reads), and A4 (122,470 reads). After quality control processing (removing chimeric and singleton sequences), the average depth of the sequences used for analysis (post-QC reads) was 96,580 reads per sample, specifically A1 (70,685 reads), A2 (117,501 reads), A3 (108,811 reads), and A4 (89,324 reads). The above data indicate that the sequencing depth fully covers the microbial community diversity, providing a reliable data basis for subsequent analysis.
The photosynthesis of cyanobacteria fixes carbon dioxide and produces organic matter that provides nutrients to other microorganisms. At the same time, actinomycetes and α-proteomycetes promote the circulation of soil organic matter and enhance the stability of the crust layer by decomposing organic matter. This algae-based, fungal-supplemented composite crust layer not only protects the rammed earth walls but also reduces water evaporation and wind erosion.
Figure 9b shows that Sample 4 has more acid-producing microbes. These may generate a large amount of acid, which can erode rammed earth walls.
According to the analysis results presented in Figure 10, there are significant differences in the microbial community compositions of the four samples, and a certain degree of overlap exists among the samples. Sample A4 contains the largest number of ASVs/OTUs (1163, accounting for 33.49% of the total), with a relatively large proportion of unique microbial communities, which might originate from an environment rich in organic matter, facilitating the growth of various microorganisms. Samples A1, A2, and A3 contain 927 (26.69%), 751 (21.62%), and 526 (15.15%) ASVs/OTUs, respectively. The overlapping area between A3 and A2 is relatively small, while A1 shares more common elements with the other samples. Particularly, sample A2, although it has 751 ASVs/OTUs, has very limited overlap with the other samples, with only 8 (0.23%) ASVs/OTUs being shared with A3. These differences suggest that different samples possess distinctiveness in the microbial community structure, and their shared parts might reflect the influence of certain environmental or treatment conditions on the microbial community.
In Figure 11, the abundant distribution of different bacterial taxonomic groups in each sample is presented. Based on the analysis of bacterial composition at the phylum level, the percentages of OTU occurrence frequency for each sample are displayed, classified by phylum. The main bacterial phyla include Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota, etc. Among them, Firmicutes occupies a relatively high abundance in most samples, particularly in sample A4, demonstrating a prominent characteristic of the dominant bacterial group. Additionally, the abundances of Bacteroidota and Actinobacteriota exhibit certain variations among different samples, which might be associated with the discrepancies in different environments or treatment conditions.
Figure 12 presents a heatmap depicting the relative abundance of various species groups in diverse samples. This heatmap underwent clustering analysis via the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) tree, and the Euclidean distance was utilized to compute the distances of the distribution of species groups within the samples. The samples in the figure were sorted in accordance with the similarity of species groups and further underwent UPGMA clustering based on the Pearson correlation coefficient between samples, ultimately presenting the abundance information of species in each group of samples. It can be discerned from the figure that there are remarkable differences in the structure of species groups among different groups. Red regions signify a higher abundance of the species in the sample, while blue regions imply a lower abundance. Specifically, certain species in A1 (such as Alicyclobacillus and Hymenobacter) possess relatively high abundances, as shown in the red areas of the heatmap, indicating the predominant position of these bacterial groups in this group of samples. In contrast, the distribution of species groups in A4 tends to be more homogeneous, with some species (such as Methylobacterium and Methylorubrum) having dominant abundances in the blue areas, suggesting that these species might be in a lower abundance state in this group of samples. Additionally, some species, such as Pseudorhizobium, Acinetobacter, and Georgenia, have higher abundances in A1 but lower abundances in other groups, which may be related to the environmental characteristics or specific ecological factors of this group. Bacterial groups, such as Bacillus and Thermocymbion, exhibit strong advantages in both A1 and A2 but are relatively scarce in other samples, which is closely associated with specific growth environments or nutrient supplies.
The statistical data of sample alpha diversity and beta diversity are shown in Table 1 and Figure 13.

3.2. XRD Test Data Analysis

Based on the whole-rock mineral composition analysis of the rammed earth material (Figure 14), there was no significant difference in the soil mineral composition of each sample. The main components included quartz (SiO2), potassium feldspar (K2O·alumina·6SiO2), and serpentine (Mg6[Si4O10](OH)8) (Figure 9). XRD spectra showed that the quartz and feldspar minerals had significant strength in the characteristic peaks of the crystal plane, which showed obvious differences in mineral composition and crystal structure from the rammed earth with cement and lime, indicating that the rammed earth building was formed by natural soil compaction.
It is worth mentioning that the nutrients K, Mg, and Si, released by mineral weathering, can promote the growth of microorganisms and algae, especially diatoms and other silicon-dependent algae. The physical structure of the mineral may also provide a habitat for the microbial community. This also explains the presence of gray–green algae on the surface of the rammed earth walls.

3.3. SEM Test Data Analysis

The SEM analysis results (Figure 15) demonstrate high consistency in the elemental composition across the four samples. Notably, an abnormally elevated calcium signal was detected in Sample 2 from the northern residential area sampling site. Field investigation revealed this anomaly was attributed to secondary calcium carbonate which had migrated to the sampling area along water flow paths, originating from the lime-based plaster layer of adjacent drainage pipes subjected to long-term water erosion.
Figure 16 illustrates the structural characteristics of the A4 connection layer at microscopic scales ranging from 500× to 5000×. The micro-morphology in Figure 16a reveals algae exhibiting a typical filamentous growth pattern, where their three-dimensional network structure physically entraps matrix particle surfaces through entanglement. Figure 16c further demonstrates that algal filaments form cross-scale biological bridges between particles, enhancing interparticle binding forces through bioadhesion. This consolidation mechanism shows significant homology with the protective effects of biocrust layers documented in the Shanhaiguan Great Wall study [29].

4. Results and Discussion

The experimental results revealed that algal crusts exhibited a dual anti-erosion mechanism in soil protection. At the macro-protection level, the algae skin can significantly reduce the impact effect of raindrop kinetic energy on the soil surface and reduce the intensity of the splash erosion of rammed earth walls by forming a biological covering. Algal biofilms’ water-holding properties enable them to quickly absorb residual water on rammed earth walls after rain, reducing moisture that could otherwise cause structural damage.
Although algae may be damaged during sampling, preventing them from normal secretion, existing studies have shown that algal photosynthetic metabolites (including biopolymers, such as polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins) form stable complexes with soil particles through cementation [30,31]. More noteworthy, the algal filaments and symbiotic hyphae construct a three-dimensional network structure in the soil pores, combined with the viscoelastic matrix formed by exopolysaccharides, to construct a multi-scale stable system with hierarchical characteristics. This structure greatly enhances the topsoil’s mechanical strength and shear resistance, thereby improving the rammed earth wall’s surface stability.
However, during the study, the researchers found that although the west wall is more intact than the other walls, it still has erosion problems. Therefore, the researchers hypothesized that the protective mechanism of the algal biocrust layer on the rammed earth wall is two-sided. Based on previous scholars’ research on the protection mechanism of biocrusts on the rammed earth wall of the Great Wall of Shanhaiguan, the researchers can conclude that when in a dry and rainless environment, just like the hot temperature conditions in Songyang County in summer, the anti-erosion effect of algal biocrusts is more significant. This is because the stable structure formed by the exopolysaccharide it secures is more stable. However, due to the cold and humid winters in Songyang County and the frequent occurrence of acid rain in recent years, the algae on the crust layer accelerate the release of acidic substances in an acidic environment, which dissolve the cemented materials (such as calcium carbonate) inside the wall, resulting in a loose wall structure and small cracks, which may cause internal damage in the long term [32]. Algal biofilms are not found all over the wall but are present in localized areas. For example, they may be present where rain washes repeatedly, such as the wall under the eaves (where the rainwater flows down the eaves) and the parts of the wall that are sunken or poorly drained (wet areas where water has accumulated for a long time). Therefore, in future conservation work, researchers should focus on the areas where algae find it easy to grow, inhibit the erosion of rammed earth walls by the acidic substances secreted by algae under certain conditions through chemical means, and optimize the compound materials of natural fiber and lime, to make algae biofilm play a better anti-erosion role.
Compared with the existing anti-erosion coatings for rammed earth buildings, the biocrust layer has the following significant advantages (Table 2).

5. Design Strategy

5.1. Design Scheme

It is found that the MICP (microbially induced calcite precipitation) technology has been extended to the field of rammed earth building protection, and the idea of a microbial coating for tulou wall anti-erosion and microbial repair of tulou cracks is proposed, while its application effect is evaluated by experimental means. The results of the study demonstrate that MICP technology can be used as an effective method to alleviate the weathering and crack repair of the surface layer of rammed earth buildings [23,24].
Based on the two main problems found in the rammed earth wall in this paper, namely (1) the existence of cracks and (2) wind and rain erosion, we determined the dual erosion resistance mechanism of algal biocrusts, as revealed by experimental analysis combined with MICP technology. Thus a composite biofilm design scheme of a “transparent film-biofiber-acid suppression layer” was proposed in this study (Figure 17).
The transparent protective layer is made of a degradable polylactic acid (PLA) mesh (mesh size 2–5 mm), which takes into account the water permeability and raindrop kinetic energy dispersion function to avoid erosion. The biofiber layer is woven into a grid (mesh 5–10 mm) with hemp fiber and coconut shell fiber, which is pre-impregnated with a nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient solution and then paved on the surface of rammed earth, and the algae attachment base (with cyanobacteria as the core, accounting for 60%–70%, supplemented by green algae and diatoms, accounting for 30%–40%) is attached to the pore structure of its rough surface, forming a three-dimensional network complex cemented with extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) soil particles. At the same time, the researchers designed an acid suppression layer to solve the problem of the dissolution of rammed earth wall cementing materials caused by the release of acidic metabolites from algae, that is, calcium carbonate microparticles were embedded in the fiber grid to dynamically neutralize the acidic substances metabolized by algae and alleviate the contradiction of “external protection and internal damage”.
Glutinous rice syrup is used between the layers for bonding. First, glutinous rice flour and deionized water were mixed at a 1:4 mass ratio. Subsequently, the colloidal mixture was uniformly coated onto the contact interfaces between the PLA mesh, biological fiber layer, and acid-resistant layer using a spatula, with the coating thickness controlled to 0.5–0.8 mm to ensure no residual bubbles remained. Finally, the layers were laminated layer-by-layer in the order of “PLA mesh → biological fiber layer → acid-resistant layer”. The rationale behind the researchers’ choice of using glutinous rice syrup as an interlayer adhesive was multifold. Firstly, glutinous rice paste, being a natural organic material, does not pose toxic threats to the microbial community. Secondly, with its weak alkalinity, the glutinous rice paste can work in synergy with the calcium carbonate microparticles in the acid-resistant layer. This synergistic effect enables the neutralization of acidic substances resulting from environmental acid rain and algal metabolism, thereby mitigating chemical corrosion at the bonding interface.

5.2. Design Advantages

This design scheme leverages the experimentally revealed anti-erosion mechanism of algal biofilms to achieve coordinated optimization of ecological compatibility and dynamic protection through a composite structure of a “transparent film-biological fiber-acid inhibition layer”. The transparent polylactic acid (PLA) mesh, with its high light transmittance, supports algal photosynthesis while preventing water-induced erosion and washing. Cyanobacteria, as the core component, secrete large amounts of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), forming a gelatinous protective layer that enhances surface stability. Green algae assist cyanobacteria by contributing to the formation of multi-layer biofilms, thereby increasing the redundancy of protection. Meanwhile, diatom shells increase surface roughness, promoting the attachment of other algal spores, and secrete silicate colloids that aid in filling micro-cracks in rammed earth [25,33]. This synergistic algal attachment base, with cyanobacteria as the primary component and green algae and diatoms as supporting elements, effectively improves the anti-erosion capability, compressive strength, and long-term durability of rammed earth walls.
Moreover, the biodegradable materials (PLA mesh and fiber layer) will naturally biodegrade over time after the algal biofilm stabilizes (after approximately 3 months), creating a self-sustaining protection system that requires no artificial maintenance. This system preserves the historical aesthetic of rammed earth walls through its natural materials and transparent structure, preventing the authenticity of cultural heritage from being compromised by traditional chemical coatings. Compared to conventional physical or chemical protection methods, this innovative design achieves a harmonious balance of efficient erosion resistance, ecological sustainability, and cultural compatibility through a multi-scale cooperative mechanism.
The sandwich-structured composite material developed by Masoud et al. (with an outer layer composed of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and an interlayer of polylactic acid (PLA) reinforced with sol–gel modified cellulose microfibers (CMF)) significantly enhanced the tensile modulus (approximately 30% increase) and hygrothermal stability of the PLA/CMF composites through chemical modification. Experimental results demonstrated that the modified CMF improved interfacial bonding with the PLA matrix, effectively inhibiting moisture penetration and microbial degradation [34]. Accelerated aging tests under simulated hot–humid conditions (temperature: 25–35 °C, humidity: 70%–85%) revealed that the degradation rate of the PLA layer remained below 15% over 12 months, with mechanical property retention exceeding 80%, indicating its potential adaptability to the subtropical monsoon climate of Songyang County.
The design of this composite biofilm strictly adheres to the principles of minimal intervention and reversibility in the protection of cultural heritage. Its minimal intervention is manifested in non-invasive coverage, which only attaches to the surface layer of the rammed earth to avoid structural damage. Degradable polylactic acid (PLA) mesh, natural plant fibers (hemp, coconut shell), and algal components are used, while irreversible chemical additives, such as cement and resin are completely abandoned. The protective performance is dynamically regulated through the photosynthesis of algae and the acid inhibition layer, reducing the need for artificial intervention. Reversibility is achieved through controllable degradation: PLA and plant fibers gradually degrade into harmless carbon dioxide and water after the algal crust is stabilized (after about 3 months; the degradation rate is less than 15% within 12 months), and a multi-level removal strategy is preset to deal with potential residues—if artificial intervention is required, a soft brush is used to gently brush for physical stripping, or lactic acid bacteria fermentation broth (pH 5–6) is sprayed to accelerate the hydrolysis of PLA, avoiding damage to the rammed earth body. Compared with single physical or chemical protection schemes, this design achieves the unification of a high-efficiency anti-erosion, ecological cycle and cultural compatibility through a multi-scale collaborative mechanism.

6. Conclusions and Outlook

6.1. Research Conclusions

Through the sampling and experimental analysis of the rammed earth wall materials of the dwellings, the conclusions of the local erosion resistance of the rammed earth dwellings in Songyang County can be concluded as follows:
  • Algal biological crusts exhibit a dual anti-erosion mechanism. From a macroscopic perspective, the biological overlay reduces the kinetic energy of raindrops and enhances water-holding characteristics, thereby absorbing surface water and mitigating damage to the wall through dry–wet cycles. From a microscopic perspective, algal photosynthetic metabolites (such as polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins) bind with soil particles to form a stable complex, while myofilament and symbiotic hyphae create a three-dimensional network. This structure significantly enhances the mechanical strength and shear resistance of the surface layer.
  • Environmental conditions dynamically influence the protective efficacy of biological crusts. In dry, rain-free environments, exopolysaccharides form a stable structure, providing robust anti-erosion effects. However, in humid and acidic conditions, algae release acidic metabolites that dissolve cemented materials (e.g., calcium carbonate), leading to a loosened internal structure and the formation of micro-cracks. This creates a contradictory effect of “external protection and internal damage”.
  • The composite bio-membrane design of the “transparent film-biological fiber-acid inhibiting layer” proposed in this study achieves the unified protection of rammed earth walls with efficient anti-erosion effects, an ecological cycle, and cultural authenticity through a multi-scale cooperative mechanism.

6.2. Insufficiencies and Prospects

The design of the “transparent film-biofiber-acid-resistant layer” is still in the theoretical stage. For example, based on existing research [35], the behavior of natural fibers (such as hemp fibers and coconut shell fibers) under different environmental conditions is as follows: when exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light, natural fibers are prone to photodegradation, resulting in a decrease in mechanical properties. It is necessary to rely on the outer protective material (such as PLA film) to indirectly mitigate the UV damage, but there is still a risk of aging during long-term exposure. During the humidity cycle, their hydrophilicity leads to moisture absorption expansion and drying shrinkage, which may cause interfacial micro-cracks. However, the water retention characteristics of the fibers can assist in buffering the moisture impact and alleviating the dry–wet stress of the rammed earth. In terms of microbial colonization, the porous structure of the fibers provides an attachment base for beneficial microorganisms (such as cyanobacteria and actinomycetes), promoting the formation of biofilms and the cementing effect of extracellular polysaccharides, and enhancing the anti-erosion ability. However, cellulose-based fibers may be degraded by fungi or actinomycetes, and it is necessary to balance the colonization effect by regulating the microbial community (such as pre-soaking in nutrient solution or using an acid inhibition layer). Therefore, in the future, we will carry out pilot experiments in Songyang County, verify our research through practice and data optimization, and promote its transformation into a scientific and practical ecological protection technology for rammed earth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L.; Data curation, Z.H.; Formal analysis, N.W., Z.H. and Y.H.; Investigation, J.Y., Z.H. and W.L.; Methodology, N.W., W.L. and S.Y.; Project administration, S.Y.; Resources, Y.H.; Visualization, N.W. and S.Y.; Writing—original draft, J.Y.; Writing—review and editing, J.Y. and S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (grant number: 22YJCZH161); the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China Industry-University-Research Project (grant number:231105342131517); and the Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project (grant number: 24NDQN150YBM). The funders had no role in the study conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from Shuai Yang (samyang@zju.edu.cn) on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the students and the staff who assisted during the field survey. The authors extend their gratitude to Ma Xin from Shiyanjia Lab (www.shiyanjia.com accessed on 22 February 2025) for providing invaluable assistance with the XRD analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, L.; Lan, Z.; Wei, C.; Ouyang, D.; Shi, B.; Chen, P.; Wang, M.; Xie, T. Practice and Reflection on Rammed Earth Architecture: The Case Study of Tiles Hill-Xiangshan Campus Reception Centre in China. Buildings 2024, 14, 4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Z.; Wang, F.T.; Zhu, Z. The Attempts of Architectural Preservation and Restoration for Traditional Chinese Village “Rescuing Old Houses Action” in Songyang. Archit. J. 2021, 1, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, B. The value of rammed earth dwellings in Hanzhong country. Henan Sci. Technol. 2010, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, Z.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Lv, Q. Research on the innovation of traditional village protection and utilization mode--Take the Songyang traditional village as an example. Rural. Econ. Sci.-Technol. 2023, 34, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, G.; Tan, S.; Feng, L. Research on Progress of Forest Fire Monitoring with Satellite Remote Sensing. Agric. Rural. Stud. 2023, 1, 0008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khadka, B. Rammed earth construction: A promising sustainable eco-friendly housing solution. In Sustainable Materials in Civil Infrastructure; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2024; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prudente, L.T. Life-cycle assessment of the environmental impact of earthen builds versus conventional builds on human health. In Sustainability and Toxicity of Building Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2024; pp. 289–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.; Lu, J.; Deng, W.; Beccarelli, P.; Lun, I.Y.F. Thermal comfort investigation of rural houses in China: A review. Build. Environ. 2023, 235, 110208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, Z.; Pan, Y.; Chen, Y. Study on construction techniques of traditional rammed earth dwellings in hongling village of bashu area. Dev. Small Cities Towns 2023, 41, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yuan, R.; Song, X.R.; Li, J.K.; Ding, C. Research on Rammed Earth Composition and Building Craftsmanship in ancient emplacement at Jiaoshan. Sci. Conserv. Archaeol. 2010, 22, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Manzano-Fernández, S.; Mileto, C.; Vegas López-Manzanares, F.; Cristini, V. Conservation and In Situ Enhancement of Earthen Architecture in Archaeological Sites: Social and Anthropic Risks in the Case Studies of the Iberian Peninsula. Heritage 2024, 7, 2239–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ou, C. Research on the application of new rammed earth construction in the restoration and reconstruction of ancient villages. Residence 2023, 159–162. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, L. Experiential Research and Application of Modified Rammed Earth Wall Materials in Northwest Sichuan Region. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao, X.W. The Influence on Cracks and Reaction Mechanism of Plants on the Conservation of Earthen Sites. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A & F University, Xianyang, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, T. The Fluence of Plants on the Rammed Earth of Earthen Sites in Xi’an. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A & F University, Xianyang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi, J.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C. The test study of the engineering properties of the earth material of the earth rammed construction. Sichuan Build. Sci. 2006, 32, 86–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prabakar, J.; Sridhar, R.S. Effect of random inclusion of sisal fiber on strength behavior of soil. Constr. Build. Mater. 2002, 16, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. der Kalu, J.; Kraus, I.; Peri´c, A.; Kraus, L. Shear Strength of Reproduced Soil Mixtures Based on Samples from Rammed Earth Walls from Eastern Croatia. Appl. Sci. 2021, 12, 11708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sabbà, M.F.; Tesoro, M.; Falcicchio, C.; Foti, D. Rammed Earth with Straw Fibers and Earth Mortar: Mix Design and Mechanical Characteristics Determination. Fibers 2021, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tripura, D.D.; Gupta, S.; Debbarma, B.; Deep, R.S.S. Flexural strength and failure trend of bamboo and coir reinforced cement stabilized rammed earth wallettes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 242, 117986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raj, S.; Mohammad, S.; Das, R.; Saha, S. Coconut fibre-reinforced cement-stabilized rammed earth blocks. World J. Eng. 2017, 14, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Affan, H.; Touati, K.; Benzaama, M.-H.; Chateigner, D.; El Mendili, Y. Earth-Based Building Incorporating Sargassum muticum Seaweed: Mechanical and Hygrothermal Performances. Buildings 2023, 13, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, S.Y.; Yu, J.; Han, L. Experimental study on the water resistance of microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation on lime-soil surfaces. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2019, 38, 1718–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, S.Y.; Yu, J.; Zeng, W.L.; Peng, X.Q.; Cai, Y.Y.; Tu, B.X. Effect of microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation on repairing cracks in lime-soil. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2020, 39, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sharma, M.; Satyam, N.; Reddy, K.R. Strength enhancement and lead immobilization of sand using consortia of bacteria and blue-green algae. J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 2020, 24, 04020049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, J. Study on traditional villages and dwellings in Songyang county, Zhejiang province. Beijing Inst. Fash. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pei, Q.; Zhang, B.; Shang, D.; Guo, Q.; Huang, J.; Zhu, J. Characters of Temperature Field of Rammed Earth Wall in Arid Environment. Coatings 2022, 12, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, N.; Yang, B.; Chen, W.; Xu, L.; Li, Y. Fluence of Prevailing Wind Direction on SappingQuantity of Rammed Earth Great Wall of the Ming Dynasty. Coatings 2022, 12, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.; Cao, H.; Dai, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, Y.; Li, D.; Zheng, L.; Li, T. Experimental test and mechanism analysis of soil crust erosion resistance of rammed earth Great Wall in rainy season. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mager, D.M.; Thomas, A.D. Extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacterial oil crusts: A review of their role in dryland oil processes. J. Arid. Environ. 2011, 75, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Cheng, X.B.; Peng, B. Research and Application of Biological Soil Crusts in the Remediation of Sandy Soil. Mod. Hortic. 2022, 45, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Komar, M.; Nowicka-Krawczyk, P.; Ruman, T.; Nizioł, J.; Dudek, M.; Gutarowska, B. Biodeterioration potential of algae on building materials-Model study. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2023, 180, 105593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhong, X.Y.; Shi, H.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.J. Water repellency characteristics of physical crusts and biological crusts and their effects on water infiltration. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 33, 1843–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chomachayi, M.D.; Blanchet, P.; Hussain, A.; Pepin, S. Development of a novel sandwich-structured composite from biopolymers and cellulose microfibers for building envelope applications. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, M.C.; Zhang, X.L.; Chang, X.; Yang, M.H.; Zhang, J.B. Research Progress of Degradable PLA/PBAT/PBS Composites Reinforced with Different Plant Fibers. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2024, 42, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Manufacturing process diagram of rammed earth wall (drawn by the authors).
Figure 1. Manufacturing process diagram of rammed earth wall (drawn by the authors).
Coatings 15 00608 g001
Figure 2. Geographical location of the study area.
Figure 2. Geographical location of the study area.
Coatings 15 00608 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of annual wind frequency rise in Lishui (source: authors, drawn using Ladybug).
Figure 3. Analysis of annual wind frequency rise in Lishui (source: authors, drawn using Ladybug).
Coatings 15 00608 g003aCoatings 15 00608 g003b
Figure 4. Aerial photography of Chenjiapu Village, Songyang County (source: photo by the authors).
Figure 4. Aerial photography of Chenjiapu Village, Songyang County (source: photo by the authors).
Coatings 15 00608 g004
Figure 5. Aerial photography of ancient villages in Songyang County (source: photo by the authors).
Figure 5. Aerial photography of ancient villages in Songyang County (source: photo by the authors).
Coatings 15 00608 g005
Figure 6. Explosion diagram of the sampling site problem distribution.
Figure 6. Explosion diagram of the sampling site problem distribution.
Coatings 15 00608 g006
Figure 7. Sampling process for rammed soil.
Figure 7. Sampling process for rammed soil.
Coatings 15 00608 g007
Figure 8. Analysis of the process.
Figure 8. Analysis of the process.
Coatings 15 00608 g008
Figure 9. Test results of microbial community diversity.
Figure 9. Test results of microbial community diversity.
Coatings 15 00608 g009
Figure 10. Test results of the Venn diagram for the ASV/OTU analysis.
Figure 10. Test results of the Venn diagram for the ASV/OTU analysis.
Coatings 15 00608 g010
Figure 11. Test results of the ASVs/OTUs in different regions of the Venn diagram.
Figure 11. Test results of the ASVs/OTUs in different regions of the Venn diagram.
Coatings 15 00608 g011
Figure 12. Test results of the heatmap of species composition at the genus level for species clustering.
Figure 12. Test results of the heatmap of species composition at the genus level for species clustering.
Coatings 15 00608 g012
Figure 13. Two-dimensional ordination plot of samples from the PCoA analysis.
Figure 13. Two-dimensional ordination plot of samples from the PCoA analysis.
Coatings 15 00608 g013
Figure 14. XRD test results.
Figure 14. XRD test results.
Coatings 15 00608 g014
Figure 15. SEM test results.
Figure 15. SEM test results.
Coatings 15 00608 g015
Figure 16. SEM photo of the A4 sample.
Figure 16. SEM photo of the A4 sample.
Coatings 15 00608 g016
Figure 17. Design concept diagram.
Figure 17. Design concept diagram.
Coatings 15 00608 g017
Table 1. Index of microbial diversity of bacterial flora.
Table 1. Index of microbial diversity of bacterial flora.
SampleChao1SimpsonShannonPielou_eObserved_SpeciesFaith_pdGoods_Coverage
A1968.740.9839886.867430.692413967.546.48610.999625
A2844.5660.9664546.608560.683689812.449.63210.998894
A3637.0060.9311955.414820.584105617.549.9650.999273
A41211.750.9475746.975160.682314119565.87460.998868
Table 2. Comparison of biological crust and artificial erosion control coatings.
Table 2. Comparison of biological crust and artificial erosion control coatings.
CharacteristicBiological Crust LayerArtificial Anti-Erosion Coating
Environmental friendlinessCompletely natural, promotes ecological circulationSome contain chemicals which may pollute the environment.
Protection dimensionMulti-path dynamic protection (against wind erosion, water erosion, and salinity damage)Single physical or chemical protection
Maintenance costsAlmost zeroRequires regular maintenance, which is costly
AdaptabilityNaturally regulates temperature and humidity, adapts to climate changeDependent on material properties, susceptible to aging effects
Cultural compatibilityPreserves the original historical appearance, in line with the needs of cultural relics protectionMay alter the appearance of the building; careful selection of materials is required
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Wang, N.; Huang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Lv, W.; Yang, S. Anti-Erosion Mechanism of Biological Crusts and Eco-Protection Technology Using Composite Biofilms for Traditional Rammed Earth Dwellings in Songyang County. Coatings 2025, 15, 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15050608

AMA Style

Yang J, Wang N, Huang Z, Huang Y, Lv W, Yang S. Anti-Erosion Mechanism of Biological Crusts and Eco-Protection Technology Using Composite Biofilms for Traditional Rammed Earth Dwellings in Songyang County. Coatings. 2025; 15(5):608. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15050608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jiahui, Ning Wang, Zebiao Huang, Yue Huang, Weilu Lv, and Shuai Yang. 2025. "Anti-Erosion Mechanism of Biological Crusts and Eco-Protection Technology Using Composite Biofilms for Traditional Rammed Earth Dwellings in Songyang County" Coatings 15, no. 5: 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15050608

APA Style

Yang, J., Wang, N., Huang, Z., Huang, Y., Lv, W., & Yang, S. (2025). Anti-Erosion Mechanism of Biological Crusts and Eco-Protection Technology Using Composite Biofilms for Traditional Rammed Earth Dwellings in Songyang County. Coatings, 15(5), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15050608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop