Next Article in Journal
An Experimental Study on the Shear Performance of a CFRP–Steel Composite Component Bushing Bolt Connection
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) as an Attempt to Determine Graphene Oxide Incorporation on Wood Surfaces
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium by NiCo2S4/BiOBr Heterogeneous Photocatalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Engineering g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

1
Institute of Micro/Nano Materials and Devices, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Bio-Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei-shi 184-8588, Tokyo, Japan
3
Zhejiang Fenghong New Material Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313300, China
4
School of Applied Science, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
Coatings 2025, 15(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010032
Submission received: 9 December 2024 / Revised: 26 December 2024 / Accepted: 28 December 2024 / Published: 2 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials and Coatings for Photocatalytic Applications)

Abstract

:
As global CO2 emissions continue to rise, addressing their environmental impact is critical in combating climate change. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction, which mimics natural photosynthesis by converting CO2 into valuable fuels and chemicals using solar energy, represents a promising approach for both reducing emissions and storing energy sustainably. However, the development of efficient photocatalysts, particularly those capable of absorbing visible light, remains a challenge. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has gained attention for its visible light absorption and chemical stability, though its performance is hindered by rapid electron–hole recombination. Similarly, bismuth tungstate (Bi2WO6) is a visible-light-active photocatalyst with promising properties, but also suffers from limited efficiency due to charge recombination. To overcome these limitations, this study focuses on the design and synthesis of a g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst, leveraging the complementary properties of both materials. The composite benefits from enhanced charge separation through the formation of a heterojunction, reducing recombination rates and improving overall photocatalytic performance. The optimized g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite exhibited significant improvements in the production rates of both CH4 and CO, achieving 18.90 and 17.78 μmol/g/h, respectively, which are 2.6 times and 1.6 times higher than those of pure Bi2WO6. The study explores how optimizing the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 interface, increasing surface area, and adjusting material ratios can further enhance the efficiency of CO2 reduction. Our findings demonstrate the potential of this composite for solar-driven CO2 conversion, offering new insights into photocatalyst design and paving the way for future advancements in CO2 mitigation technologies.

1. Introduction

As global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions continue to rise, their environmental impact has become a central issue in the fight against climate change [1,2]. CO2, a significant greenhouse gas, is primarily released from the burning of fossil fuels and industrial processes, contributing to the ongoing rise in global temperatures and leading to a host of negative ecological and socio-economic consequences. Addressing this issue requires not only the reduction of CO2 emissions, but also the development of technologies that can convert CO2 into useful products [3,4]. Among the various methods explored for CO2 mitigation, photocatalytic CO2 reduction stands out as a promising approach due to its potential to utilize abundant solar energy to convert CO2 into valuable fuels and chemicals [5,6]. This process not only addresses the need for CO2 reduction, but also offers a sustainable method of energy storage in the form of chemical bonds.
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction mimics natural photosynthesis, utilizing sunlight to drive the conversion of CO2 into carbon-based products such as methane, methanol, or formic acid [7,8,9]. Despite the potential of this process, the development of efficient photocatalysts capable of harnessing sunlight, particularly in the visible spectrum, remains a significant challenge [10,11]. Effective photocatalysts must meet several criteria, including strong light absorption, efficient separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, a suitable band structure for CO2 reduction, and chemical stability [12,13]. While materials such as CO2 have been widely studied in this field, their limited activity under visible light has motivated the search for alternative photocatalysts [14].
Among the materials investigated, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has attracted significant attention due to its unique properties. g-C3N4 is a metal-free polymeric semiconductor composed of carbon and nitrogen, making it an environmentally friendly option [15,16,17,18,19]. It possesses a moderate band gap of around 2.7 eV, which allows it to absorb visible light, a crucial requirement for solar-driven processes. Additionally, g-C3N4 is chemically stable and easy to synthesize from inexpensive, earth-abundant precursors. These features make it an attractive candidate for photocatalytic CO2 reduction [20,21]. However, g-C3N4 suffers from several limitations that restrict its photocatalytic performance. The material has a relatively low surface area, which limits the number of active sites available for catalysis. More critically, it experiences rapid recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, leading to poor charge separation and reduced photocatalytic efficiency. These shortcomings have spurred efforts to modify g-C3N4 to enhance its performance, either through structural modification or by combining it with other materials to form composite photocatalysts [22,23]. Bismuth tungstate (Bi2WO6) is another promising photocatalyst that has gained attention for its ability to absorb visible light due to its relatively narrow band gap of around 2.8 eV [24,25]. Bi2WO6 belongs to the Aurivillius family of layered oxides and exhibits excellent stability and photocatalytic properties [26,27]. Its layered structure is particularly beneficial for photocatalysis as it facilitates the separation of photogenerated charge carriers, which is crucial for maintaining high catalytic activity. Bi2WO6 has been studied for various photocatalytic applications, including pollutant degradation and water splitting [28,29]. However, like g-C3N4, it faces challenges such as the rapid recombination of electron–hole pairs and a limited surface area, which restricts the number of active sites available for photocatalytic reactions [30,31]. Moreover, its photocatalytic activity under visible light, while notable, still falls short of the performance needed for large-scale applications, particularly for CO2 reduction.
To address the limitations of both g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6, researchers have explored the design of composite photocatalysts that combine the advantages of both materials. The g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst has emerged as a promising candidate for enhancing photocatalytic CO2 reduction [32,33]. By combining g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6, the composite benefits from the visible-light absorption capabilities of both materials, while the formation of a heterojunction between them enhances charge separation and reduces recombination rates. The heterojunction creates an interface where electrons and holes can migrate more efficiently, thus improving the overall photocatalytic performance. Additionally, the composite structure can increase the surface area and expose more active sites for CO2 adsorption and conversion, which is critical for improving the efficiency of the reduction process. The g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite takes advantage of the complementary properties of both materials. g-C3N4, with its moderate band gap and chemical stability, provides a strong foundation for visible-light absorption, while Bi2WO6 contributes to efficient charge separation and additional visible-light activity. The combination of these two materials has been shown to enhance the photocatalytic reduction of CO2, producing higher yields of valuable products compared to either material alone. Furthermore, the composite offers the potential to tune the electronic structure by optimizing the ratio of g-C3N4 to Bi2WO6, further improving the material’s photocatalytic properties. However, despite these promising results, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed to fully realize the potential of g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalysts. One of the primary challenges is optimizing the interface between the two materials to maximize charge separation and minimize recombination. The efficiency of the heterojunction depends heavily on the quality of the interface and the degree of contact between g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6. Poor contact or mismatched energy levels can hinder charge transfer, reducing the overall photocatalytic performance.
In this study, we aim to engineer a g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst with enhanced efficiency for photocatalytic CO2 reduction (Figure 1). Our work focuses on optimizing the synthesis of the composite to achieve a well-constructed heterojunction that promotes efficient charge separation and light absorption. We also investigate the structural and electronic properties of the composite to gain insights into the factors that influence its photocatalytic performance. Through a combination of experimental analysis and theoretical modeling, we aim to provide a detailed understanding of how the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite functions as a photocatalyst and to identify key areas for further improvement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Chemicals

In this experiment, high-purity reagents were used to ensure precise synthesis and consistent performance. Bismuth nitrate pentahydrate (Bi(NO3)3∙5H2O) served as the bismuth source, while sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na2WO6∙2H2O) provided the tungsten source for synthesizing Bi2WO6. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, C19H42BrN) was used as a surfactant to control the morphology during synthesis. Melamine (C3H6N6) was a precursor for synthesizing g-C3N4, contributing nitrogen and carbon sources during polymerization.

2.2. Synthesis of Bi2WO6

Dissolve 1 mmol of Na2WO4·2H2O, 2 mmol of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, and 0.05 g of CTAB in 80 mL of deionized water. Ultrasonicate the mixture for 15 min, followed by magnetic stirring for 30 min. Afterward, transfer the solution into a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and conduct a hydrothermal reaction at 120 °C for 24 h. Once the reaction is complete, centrifuge the mixture to collect the product, then wash it several times, alternately with deionized water and absolute ethanol. Finally, dry the product at 70 °C for later use.

2.3. Synthesis of g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst

First, place 3 g of melamine in a muffle furnace. Heat the furnace at a rate of 10 °C/min until it reaches 550 °C. Maintain this temperature for 4 h, to thermally condense the melamine, resulting in the formation of g-C3N4. Next, dissolve 100 mg of Bi2WO6 and 5 mg of g-C3N4 in 40 mL of deionized water. Ultrasonically mix the solution for 10 min, followed by magnetic stirring for 1 h. After stirring, centrifuge the mixture to collect the product, then wash it several times, alternately with deionized water and absolute ethanol. Finally, dry the product at 70 °C for future use. Following the same method, prepare photocatalysts by mixing 100 mg of Bi2WO6 with 10 mg of g-C3N4, and 100 mg of Bi2WO6 with 15 mg of g-C3N4. The photocatalysts with 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg of g-C3N4 incorporated into Bi2WO6 are referred to as 1g-C3N4-Bi2WO6, 2g-C3N4-Bi2WO6, and 3g-C3N4-Bi2WO6, respectively.

2.4. Characterization

The synthesized samples were characterized using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a Cu Kα radiation source (wavelength λ = 1.5406 Å). The diffraction patterns were recorded over a scanning range of 10° to 90° with a step size of 0.02° and a scan speed of 0.2°/min. The resolution of the XRD measurement is approximately 0.01°, and the phase composition and crystalline structure of the samples were identified by comparing the diffraction peaks with standard diffraction cards (JCPDS database). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed using an Invenio R model (Bruker) in the range of 4000 to 400 cm⁻1. The resolution of the FTIR spectra was set to 4 cm⁻1, and 64 scans were co-added for each measurement to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. The spectra were recorded using the transmission mode, with samples pressed into KBr pellets. The IR spectra were analyzed to identify characteristic functional groups and molecular vibrations, providing insights into the chemical bonding and structure of the materials. The ultraviolet–visible absorption capacity of the samples was measured using a UV-3900 ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The resolution of the UV-Vis measurements was 1 nm, and the scanning range extended from 250 to 800 nm. The excitation source used was a 150 W xenon lamp, and the diffuse reflectance was converted into the absorption spectrum using the Kubelka–Munk function. This characterization provides important information regarding the light absorption properties and optical bandgap of the samples. Additionally, the morphology and microstructure of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) operating at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. The samples were coated with a thin layer of gold to prevent charging during imaging. The SEM images allowed for a detailed examination of the surface morphology, particle size, and distribution of the composite materials. These advanced characterization techniques, along with their specific technical parameters, provide comprehensive insights into the structural, optical, and morphological properties of the synthesized materials, which are essential for understanding their photocatalytic behavior.

2.5. Photocatalytic Experiments

In this experiment, the photocatalytic performance was evaluated using a Labsolar-6A all-glass automatic online gas analysis system equipped with a 300 W xenon lamp. The entire reaction system consists of a quartz reaction cell, a vacuum system, and a gas chromatograph. The specific procedure is as follows: 20 mg of the prepared photocatalyst was added to 0.1 mL of deionized water under magnetic stirring, to achieve a uniformly dispersed solution. The solution was then evenly dripped onto a quartz fiber filter membrane, which was placed in the reaction vessel. The quartz fiber filter membrane was positioned at the bottom of the reactor and sealed with a quartz cover. High-purity CO2 was used to purge the reaction system for 1 h to remove any air or impurities. The system was illuminated using a 300 W xenon lamp as the light source. The reaction was conducted at ambient temperature and pressure, with argon (Ar) as the carrier gas. The gaseous products were analyzed using both a flame ionization detector (FID, Zhejiang Fuli Analytical Instrument Co., LTD, Taizhou, China) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD, Zhejiang Fuli Analytical Instrument Co., LTD, Taizhou, China). After the reaction, the samples were collected to assess the stability and recyclability of the photocatalyst under the same testing conditions.

2.6. Photoelectrochemical Testing

In this experiment, a standard three-electrode system was used, with 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution as the electrolyte. The reference electrode and counter electrode were made of Ag/AgCl and platinum (Pt), respectively, while the sample to be tested served as the working electrode. A 300 W xenon lamp was used as the light source. The preparation of the working electrode was as follows: 5 mg of photocatalyst was added to 1 mL of ethanol and ultrasonically dispersed for 20 min. A mixture of 25 μL of the solution and 25 μL of an adhesive was then dripped onto conductive glass, followed by drying under heat for subsequent testing. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was measured under open-circuit voltage conditions, with a frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz and an AC amplitude of 0.001 V. This technique is commonly used to study how the capacitance of the photoanode surface affects the charge transfer rate. The size of the charge transfer resistance is related to the radius of the Nyquist plot, which indirectly reflects the separation efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. The transient photocurrent response was measured under constant voltage conditions, where the working electrode was excited by light energy. Electrons were excited and transitioned, generating a current that varied over time. The resulting curve can be used to explain the separation and transport rates of charge carriers generated in the working electrode after photoexcitation. These photoelectrochemical tests provide critical insights into the charge separation and transport behavior of the photocatalyst, which are key factors influencing its overall photocatalytic efficiency.

3. Results

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst is shown in Figure 2. The diffraction peaks of Bi2WO6 are observed at 28.6°, 33.0°, 47.4°, 56.1°, 59.0°, 69.1° and 75.9°, corresponding to the (113), (200), (220), (313), (226), (040), and (139) crystal planes, respectively. These peaks are consistent with the standard JCPDS card (No. 73-2020) [34], indicating that the prepared Bi2WO6 has high crystallinity. The strong intensity and sharpness of the Bi2WO6 diffraction peaks, combined with the absence of any impurity peaks, further confirm the high purity and well-ordered crystalline structure of the synthesized Bi2WO6. For g-C3N4, its characteristic diffraction peaks correspond to the (001) and (110) planes, indicating successful synthesis of g-C3N4. However, after the two materials were combined to form the composite, the XRD pattern is primarily dominated by the diffraction peaks of Bi2WO6, and no distinct diffraction peaks for g-C3N4 are detected. This absence is likely due to the small amount of g-C3N4 in the composite, which falls below the detection limit of XRD. Despite not being visible in the XRD pattern, the successful integration of g-C3N4 with Bi2WO6 is supported by other characterization methods, as its presence can still influence the photocatalytic activity through synergistic interactions between the two materials.
The morphology of the synthesized samples was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as depicted in Figure 3. The SEM images reveal that Bi2WO6 exhibits a flower-like nanostructure comprising nanosheets. Similarly, g-C3N4 also exhibits a microstructure composed of numerous irregularly shaped nanosheets. The structural similarity between the two materials, particularly their sheet-like architectures, provides a favorable foundation for forming a heterojunction between them. This structural compatibility is critical in facilitating intimate contact between Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4, which is essential for efficient charge separation and transfer in the composite photocatalyst. The ultrathin nanosheets of Bi2WO6 offer a large surface area, potentially increasing the number of active sites for the photocatalytic reaction. Moreover, the integration of g-C3N4, despite its relatively low loading, can enhance light absorption and promote electron–hole separation, further boosting the photocatalytic efficiency. The flower-like arrangement of Bi2WO6 nanosheets, combined with the irregular sheet structure of g-C3N4, creates a highly porous and interconnected architecture, which could improve the diffusion of reactants and products during the photocatalytic process. This synergistic interaction between the two materials underscores the importance of their morphological characteristics in enhancing the overall performance of the composite photocatalyst.
The SEM image of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, shown in Figure 4, reveals that the composite retains the microstructural features of Bi2WO6. The ultrathin nanosheets not only maintain their characteristic morphology, but also play a crucial role in enhancing the photocatalytic performance. These nanosheets provide an abundance of surface-active sites, which are essential for catalyzing reactions, and also shorten the migration path of charge carriers, thereby improving their mobility. The high surface area and well-dispersed sheet-like structure of Bi2WO6 facilitate the effective separation and migration of photo-induced electron–hole pairs. This characteristic is crucial for the composite’s performance in photocatalytic CO2 reduction, where efficient charge separation is necessary to drive the reduction reaction. Additionally, the integration of g-C3N4, although not directly visible in the SEM image, likely contributes to light harvesting and enhances the composite’s photocatalytic efficiency through its role in further improving charge separation. The combination of these two materials, with their complementary properties, creates a microstructure that is highly conducive to photocatalysis. The interconnected nanosheets offer pathways for rapid charge transport, while the heterojunction between g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 promotes effective charge transfer between the two phases. This synergistic effect not only boosts the catalytic activity, but also makes the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite a promising candidate for photocatalytic CO2 reduction, enabling the conversion of CO2 into valuable chemicals under light irradiation [35,36]. The overall microstructural characteristics of the composite provide a solid foundation for achieving high photocatalytic efficiency.
The infrared absorption spectra (FTIR) of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst, as shown in Figure 5, provide further insights into the structural composition of the materials. Bi2WO6 exhibits seven distinct infrared absorption peaks, two of which can be attributed to background absorption resulting from atmospheric interference and instrumental factors. The peaks at 669 and 720 cm−1 correspond to the infrared vibrational absorption of Bi-O and Bi-W bonds, respectively, indicating the presence of the metal–oxygen framework. Additionally, the peak at 1385 cm−1 is associated with the absorption of hydroxyl groups (OH) on the surface of Bi2WO6, highlighting the material’s surface chemistry. The peaks observed at 2850 and 2926 cm−1 are attributed to the infrared vibrational modes of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), which was used during the synthesis of ultrathin Bi2WO6 nanosheets to prevent excessive stacking of the layers. On the other hand, g-C3N4 primarily shows three infrared absorption peaks, with two corresponding to background absorption. The peak at 806 cm−1 is characteristic of the vibrational mode of the C-N bonds within the g-C3N4 structure, confirming the presence of g-C3N4 in the material. After the combination of g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6, the FTIR spectrum is dominated by the absorption peaks of Bi2WO6. However, the peak at 806 cm−1, corresponding to the C-N vibrational mode, is still clearly visible, demonstrating the successful incorporation of g-C3N4 into the composite. This preservation of the C-N vibrational peak, alongside the dominant Bi2WO6 absorption features, confirms the successful formation of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 heterojunction. The FTIR analysis, in conjunction with the previously discussed XRD and SEM results, provides strong evidence that the composite retains key structural elements from both g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6. The preservation of characteristic vibrational modes indicates that the synthesis process has not altered the core structural integrity of the individual components, while the presence of CTAB during synthesis further enhances the structural stability of the Bi2WO6 nanosheets by preventing agglomeration. The successful formation of the heterojunction, evidenced by both FTIR and SEM, suggests that this composite is well-positioned to take advantage of the complementary properties of g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 for enhanced photocatalytic activity, particularly in applications such as CO2 reduction. Note that the peaks at 2341 and 2361 cm−1 are attributed to atmospheric CO2 interference, which may bond to the surface of the material from the air.
The UV–visible absorption spectra and bandgap diagrams of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites are shown in Figure 6. For pure Bi2WO6, the absorption edge in the UV region is observed at around 450 nm, while g-C3N4 shows a broader absorption edge extending to approximately 550 nm. In the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites, the absorption edge of the 1g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 and 2g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 samples remains similar to that of pure Bi2WO6, with a maximum absorption edge around 450 nm. However, the 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite shows a slight redshift in the absorption edge, with its maximum absorption edge extending to approximately 470 nm. This redshift in the 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite suggests enhanced light absorption in the visible region, which is beneficial for photocatalytic applications. The shift indicates that with an increasing g-C3N4 content, the composite can harness a broader range of visible light, thus potentially improving photocatalytic efficiency. The incorporation of g-C3N4 into the Bi2WO6 matrix modifies the optical properties of the composite, allowing for more effective utilization of solar energy. The bandgaps of g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6, as shown in the inset of the figure, further confirm their respective electronic properties. Bi2WO6 has a bandgap of 3.21 eV, which corresponds to its ability to absorb UV light, while g-C3N4 has a smaller bandgap of 2.72 eV, allowing it to absorb more visible light. This complementary relationship between the two materials in terms of their bandgaps enables the composite to cover a wider range of the solar spectrum, thus improving the potential for photocatalysis. The adjustment of the bandgap in the composite materials, particularly in the 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 sample, suggests that the combination of g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 can optimize light absorption and increase the generation of photoinduced charge carriers. This is crucial for enhancing photocatalytic performance, as the ability to absorb more visible light directly correlates to the photocatalyst’s ability to drive chemical reactions, such as CO2 reduction, under solar irradiation. Therefore, the UV–visible absorption and bandgap analysis further supports the suitability of g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 as an efficient photocatalyst, with the potential for tunable optical properties through compositional adjustments.
The photocatalytic performance of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite for CO2 reduction is illustrated in Figure 7. During the photocatalytic reaction, the main products observed are CO and CH4. After 4 h of photocatalysis, the CH4/CO production rates for Bi2WO6, g-C3N4, 1g-C3N4/Bi2WO6, 2g-C3N4/Bi2WO6, and 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 were measured as 7.21/10.98, 2.63/19.63, 18.90/17.78, 4.80/29.82, and 18.80/9.91 μmol/g/h, respectively. It is evident that the g-C3N4 content plays a crucial role in product selectivity and the overall performance of photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The 1g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite exhibited significant improvements in the production rates of both CH4 and CO, which were 18.90 and 17.78 μmol/g/h, respectively. These rates are much higher compared to pure Bi2WO6, which only produced CH4 and CO at rates of 7.21 and 10.98 μmol/g/h. The significant enhancement in photocatalytic performance can be attributed to synergistic effects observed specifically in two composites (1g- and 3g- C3N4/Bi2WO6) and specifically for CH4 production. These synergistic effects enhance light absorption, charge separation, and reaction kinetics. For the 2 g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, the CH4 production rate was lower at 4.80 μmol/g/h, while the CO production rate increased to 29.82 μmol/g/h. This indicates a high selectivity for CO over CH4 in this composition, suggesting that adjusting the g-C3N4 content in the composite can influence the product distribution between CO and CH4. Such tunable selectivity is a valuable trait for photocatalysts, allowing for targeted production of desired products, depending on the application. In the case of the 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, the CH4 and CO production rates were measured at 18.80 and 9.91 μmol/g/h, respectively. This composition showed a notable preference for CH4 production, similar to the 1g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, but with a slightly reduced CO production rate. Overall, the results clearly demonstrate that the g-C3N4 content has a significant impact on both the product selectivity and the overall photocatalytic efficiency of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites for CO2 reduction. The 1g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, in particular, showed the highest total production of CH4 and CO, indicating that an optimal balance between g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 can maximize the photocatalytic activity. Comparative analysis with some previous studies (see Table 1) indicates that the CO and CH4 production rates achieved in this study are competitive with existing research findings. The enhanced performance is likely due to the improved light absorption and better charge carrier separation in the heterojunction, leading to more efficient photoreduction of CO2. Additionally, the varying selectivity toward CO or CH4 observed in different composites highlights the potential for tuning the reaction pathways by adjusting the material composition, providing flexibility for specific catalytic applications.
To elucidate the underlying mechanism, photoelectrochemical tests were conducted, and the photocurrent responses of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites are presented in Figure 8. In photocatalysts, the efficiency of electron–hole pair separation under illumination is reflected in the photocurrent density; a higher photocurrent density indicates faster separation of photogenerated charge carriers [45]. It can be observed that both pure g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 exhibit the lowest photocurrent responses, indicating poor charge carrier separation efficiency (Figure 8a). However, after the formation of a heterojunction between g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6, the photocurrent responses of the composites surpass those of the individual materials. Among the composites, 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 shows the highest photocurrent response, suggesting that it has the most efficient charge carrier separation. This enhanced photocurrent in the composites can be attributed to the formation of a heterojunction, which facilitates the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes. In pure g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6, rapid recombination of these carriers limits their photocatalytic efficiency. However, in the composite materials, the heterojunction creates a favorable pathway for charge carriers to be separated and transferred, thereby reducing recombination and enhancing overall photocatalytic activity. The superior performance of the 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, in particular, implies that the optimal balance between g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 allows for maximum charge separation and transfer, leading to the highest photocatalytic efficiency. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results, shown in Figure 8b, provide further insights into the interfacial charge transfer properties of the photocatalysts. The semicircles observed in the high-frequency region of the Nyquist plots correspond to the charge transfer resistance at the photocatalyst–electrolyte interface. Generally, a smaller semicircle radius indicates lower interfacial resistance and higher charge carrier mobility. Bi2WO6 exhibits the largest semicircle, indicating the highest charge transfer resistance and, thus, the lowest charge carrier mobility [46,47]. Upon the introduction of g-C3N4 into the composite, the impedance decreases significantly, confirming improved charge carrier mobility in the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 heterostructure. Among the composites, 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 displays the smallest semicircle, representing the lowest interfacial resistance and the highest charge carrier mobility. The improved charge transfer and reduced recombination rates observed in the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites, particularly in the 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 sample, can be explained by the effective formation of the heterojunction. This junction facilitates the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes, allowing them to migrate efficiently to the catalyst surface, where they can participate in the photocatalytic reaction. Additionally, the reduced impedance in the composites highlights the improved electrical conductivity and charge transfer properties, which are crucial for enhancing the overall photocatalytic performance. In summary, the photoelectrochemical analysis confirms that the formation of a g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 heterojunction plays a vital role in boosting charge carrier separation and mobility, ultimately leading to enhanced photocatalytic activity. The 3g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite, in particular, demonstrates the best performance, due to its superior photocurrent response and lowest interfacial resistance, making it an ideal candidate for high-efficiency photocatalysis.

4. Discussion

Figure 9 illustrates the mechanistic process of the Bi2WO6/g-C3N4 hybrid based on a type-II heterojunction. According to literature reports, the conduction band (CB) position of g-C3N4 is higher (more negative) than that of Bi2WO6 [48,49]. As a result, photogenerated electrons (e⁻) in the conduction band of g-C3N4 are rapidly transferred to the conduction band of Bi2WO6. Simultaneously, the photogenerated holes (h⁺) in the valence band of Bi2WO6 migrate to the valence band of g-C3N4. This charge transfer process effectively prevents the fast recombination of charge carriers, a common issue in photocatalytic systems. The prevention of charge recombination is crucial, because it increases the lifetime of the photogenerated electrons and holes, allowing them to participate in redox reactions. In this heterojunction system, the holes accumulated in the valence band of g-C3N4 are strong enough to oxidize H2O molecules, producing O2 and H⁺ ions. The production of oxygen is a clear indicator of the system’s oxidative capabilities, and supports the photocatalytic water-splitting process. On the reduction side, CO2 molecules are adsorbed onto the surface, where the electrons transferred to the conduction band of Bi2WO6 play a key role. These electrons are capable of reducing CO2 into valuable products like CO and CH4. The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is a critical step in solar fuel production, and the ability of the composite material to facilitate this reaction is a major advantage. The type-II heterojunction between g-C3N4 and Bi2WO6 is particularly effective for this photocatalytic system, because it optimally aligns the energy bands of the two materials, allowing for efficient charge separation and transfer. The higher conduction band of g-C3N4 promotes electron transfer to Bi2WO6, while the lower valence band of Bi2WO6 allows for hole transfer to g-C3N4. This dual pathway minimizes electron–hole recombination, thus enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency of both oxidation and reduction processes. In summary, the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 heterojunction system not only facilitates effective charge separation, but also supports both oxidative and reductive photocatalytic reactions. The oxidation of water at the g-C3N4 valence band produces oxygen, while CO2 is reduced at the Bi2WO6 conduction band to produce useful products like CO and CH4.

5. Conclusions

In this study, Bi2WO6 was successfully synthesized using a hydrothermal method, while g-C3N4 was prepared by the calcination of melamine. Subsequently, g-C3N4 was combined with Bi2WO6 to form the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst, which was thoroughly characterized, and its photocatalytic performance in CO2 conversion was evaluated. The experimental results demonstrate that when the loading of g-C3N4 is below 15% of the total Bi2WO6 weight, the introduction of g-C3N4 does not significantly alter the microstructure of Bi2WO6. However, it substantially enhances its photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance. The addition of g-C3N4 significantly reduces the recombination rate of photogenerated electron–hole pairs in Bi2WO6, thereby improving its photocatalytic efficiency for CO2 conversion. These findings reveal the promising potential of the g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite for solar-driven photocatalytic CO2 conversion, offering a new pathway to address climate change and energy challenges. Future research should focus on optimizing the structural design of these composite materials and exploring more efficient mechanisms for photocatalytic CO2 conversion, aiming for broader applications and greater environmental benefits.

Author Contributions

W.C. (investigation, writing—original draft,), L.N. (data curation, writing—review and editing), K.O. (supervision, writing—review and editing), H.S. (software), J.B. (project administration), H.H. (writing—review and editing). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Hong Sun was employed by the company Zhejiang Fenghong New Material Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Solomon, S.; Plattner, G.-K.; Knutti, R.; Friedlingstein, P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1704–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Choudhury, T.; Kayani, U.N.; Gul, A.; Haider, S.A.; Ahmad, S. Carbon emissions, environmental distortions, and impact on growth. Energy Econ. 2023, 126, 107040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Centi, G.; Quadrelli, E.A.; Perathoner, S. Catalysis for CO2 conversion: A key technology for rapid introduction of renewable energy in the value chain of chemical industries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1711–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mustafa, A.; Lougou, B.G.; Shuai, Y.; Wang, Z.; Tan, H. Current technology development for CO2 utilization into solar fuels and chemicals: A review. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 49, 96–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, L.; Hou, H.; Wang, L.; Bowen, C.R.; Wang, J.; Yan, R.; Zhan, X.; Yang, H.; Yang, M.; Yang, W. Atomic-level surface modification of ultrathin Bi2WO6 nanosheets for boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 480, 148033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hou, H.; Bowen, C.R.; Yang, D.; Yang, W. Cation-exchange-upgraded nanostructures for photocatalysts. Chem 2024, 10, 800–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Lee, A.F. Synthetic strategies to nanostructured photocatalysts for CO2 reduction to solar fuels and chemicals. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 14487–14516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumar, A.; Hasija, V.; Sudhaik, A.; Raizada, P.; Van Le, Q.; Singh, P.; Pham, T.-H.; Kim, T.; Ghotekar, S.; Nguyen, V.-H. Artificial leaf for light-driven CO2 reduction: Basic concepts, advanced structures and selective solar-to-chemical products. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 133031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huan, L.; Huitong, D.; Huanhuan, L.; Hua, W.; Wenlei, Z.; Yang, Z. Recent developments in metal nanocluster-based catalysts for improving photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance. Microstructures 2023, 3, 2023024. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schultz, D.M.; Yoon, T.P. Solar synthesis: Prospects in visible light photocatalysis. Science 2014, 343, 1239176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, F.; Li, Q.; Xu, D. Recent progress in semiconductor-based nanocomposite photocatalysts for solar-to-chemical energy conversion. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiao, X.; Zheng, K.; Liang, L.; Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Xie, Y. Fundamentals and challenges of ultrathin 2D photocatalysts in boosting CO2 photoreduction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 6592–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, G.; Liu, S.; Lai, C.; Qin, L.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Xu, M.; Ma, D.; Xu, F.; Liu, S. Strategies for enhancing the photocatalytic and electrocatalytic efficiency of covalent triazine frameworks for CO2 reduction. Small 2024, 20, 2307853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kaiyue, H.; Jiayu, T.; Zhifu, Z.; Daming, Z.; Xiangjiu, G. Direct Z-scheme photocatalytic systems based on vdW heterostructures for water splitting and CO2 reduction: Fundamentals and recent advances. Microstructures 2024, 4, 2024021. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ong, W.-J.; Tan, L.-L.; Ng, Y.H.; Yong, S.-T.; Chai, S.-P. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: Are we a step closer to achieving sustainability? Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7159–7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Muhmood, T.; Ahmad, I.; Haider, Z.; Haider, S.K.; Shahzadi, N.; Aftab, A.; Ahmed, S.; Ahmad, F. Graphene-like graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as a semiconductor photocatalyst: Properties, classification, and defects engineering approaches. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 25, 100633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Gao, X.; Xue, Y.; Li, B.; Zhu, X. Construction of a graphitic carbon nitride-based photocatalyst with a strong built-in electric field via π–π stacking interactions boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 7807–7816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhanderi, D.; Lakhani, P.; Modi, C.K. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as an emerging photocatalyst for sustainable environmental applications: A comprehensive review. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 265–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stefa, S.; Skliri, E.; Gagaoudakis, E.; Kiriakidis, G.; Kotzias, D.; Papagiannakopoulos, P.; Konsolakis, M.; Mao, S.; Binas, V. Visible light photocatalytic oxidation of NO using g-C3N4 nanosheets: Stability, kinetics, and effect of humidity. Appl. Phys. A 2024, 130, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Q.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wei, Z.; Guo, Q.; Jin, H.; Tang, H.; Li, S.; Pan, X.; Su, Z. Recent advances in solar-driven CO2 reduction over g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Carbon Energy 2023, 5, e205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, B.; Cui, Y.; Lei, Y.; Li, W.; Sun, J. Design and application of g-C3N4-based materials for fuels photosynthesis from CO2 or H2O based on reaction pathway insights. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 629, 825–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hou, H.; Shao, G.; Yang, W. Recent advances in g-C3N4-based photocatalysts incorporated by MXenes and their derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 13722–13745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Song, X.-L.; Chen, L.; Gao, L.-J.; Ren, J.-T.; Yuan, Z.-Y. Engineering g-C3N4 based materials for advanced photocatalysis: Recent advances. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 42, 166–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, T.; Liu, L.; Hu, C.; Huang, H. Recent advances on Bi2WO6-based photocatalysts for environmental and energy applications. Chinese J. Catal. 2021, 42, 1413–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, B.; Liu, X.J.; Zhu, H.W.; Guan, H.P.; Guo, R.T. A Review on Bi2WO6-Based Materials for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Small 2024, 20, 2406074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Supriya, S. Tailoring layered structure of bismuth-based aurivillius perovskites: Recent advances and future aspects. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2023, 479, 215010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Belousov, A.; Parkhacheva, A.; Suleimanov, E.; Shafiq, I. Potential of Bi2WO6-based heterojunction photocatalysts for environmental remediation. Materials Today Chem. 2023, 32, 101633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mandyal, P.; Guleria, A.; Sharma, R.; Sambyal, S.; Priye, A.; Fang, B.; Shandilya, P. Insight into the properties, morphologies and photocatalytic applications of S-scheme Bi2WO6. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.; Yang, B.; He, H.; Yang, S.; Duan, X.; Wang, S. Bismuth-based complex oxides for photocatalytic applications in environmental remediation and water splitting: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 150215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ling, G.Z.S.; Ng, S.F.; Ong, W.J. Tailor-engineered 2D cocatalysts: Harnessing electron–hole redox center of 2D g-C3N4 photocatalysts toward solar-to-chemical conversion and environmental purification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2111875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; He, Z.; Liu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ong, W.-J.; Duan, Y.; Ho, W.; Dong, F. Inside-and-out modification of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) photocatalysts via defect engineering for energy and environmental science. Nano Energy 2023, 105, 108032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ge, L.; Han, C.; Liu, J. Novel visible light-induced g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalysts for efficient degradation of methyl orange. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2011, 108, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D.; He, W.; Fang, X.; Zhao, C.; Pan, J.; Liu, D.; Liu, S.; Chen, T. Nanoengineering construction o g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 S-scheme heterojunctions for cooperative enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction and pollutant degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 128893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Z.; Zeng, H.; Xiong, J.; Peng, D.; Liu, S. F-doped Bi2WO6 with rich oxygen vacancies for boosting photo-oxidation/reduction activity. Colloid. Surface A 2023, 675, 132035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Deng, Y.; Wang, J.; Peng, B. Plasmonic Bi metal deposition and g-C3N4 coating on Bi2WO6 microspheres for efficient visible-light photocatalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.; Jiang, W.; Luo, W.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y. Ultrathin nanosheets g-C3N4@ Bi2WO6 core-shell structure via low temperature reassembled strategy to promote photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 237, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Fan, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, M.; Shi, J. Highly selective CO2 photoreduction to CO over g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 5189–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, L.; Wang, T.; Zhang, H.; Chang, K.; Ye, J. Electrostatic self-assembly of nanosized carbon nitride nanosheet onto a zirconium metal–organic framework for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5360–5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, Q.; Yu, J.; Cao, S.; Cui, C.; Cheng, B. Efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by amine-functionalized g-C3N4. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.C.; Yao, H.C.; Fan, Z.Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.S.; Zang, S.Q.; Li, Z.J. Indirect Z-scheme BiOI/g-C3N4 photocatalysts with enhanced photoreduction CO2 activity under visible light irradiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016, 8, 3765–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bai, Y.; Ye, L.; Wang, L.; Shi, X.; Wang, P.; Bai, W.; Wong, P.K. g-C3N4/Bi4O5I2 heterojunction with I3−/I redox mediator for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 194, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jo, W.; Kumar, S.; Eslava, S.; Tonda, S. Construction of Bi2WO6/RGO/g-C3N4 2D/2D/2D hybrid Z-scheme heterojunctions with large interfacial contact area for efficient charge separation and high-performance photoreduction of CO2 and H2O into solar fuels. Appl. Catal. B. 2018, 239, 586–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Murugesan, P.; Narayanan, S.; Manickam, M. Experimental studies on photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using AgBr decorated g-C3N4 composite in TEA mediated system. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 22, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Z.; Kim, R.; Vollmer, S.; Subramanian, S.V. Direct Z-scheme WO3/graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposites for the photoreduction of CO2. ACS Appl. Nano. Mater. 2020, 3, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, M.; Zhan, X.-Q.; Ou, D.-L.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L.-L.; Yang, H.-L.; Liao, Z.-Y.; Yang, W.-Y.; Ma, G.-Z.; Hou, H.-L. Efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen production with Ag-doped flower-like ZnIn2S4 microspheres. Rare Met. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yuan, X.; Shen, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zou, H.; Liu, Z.; Peng, F. Z-scheme Bi2WO6/CuBi2O4 heterojunction mediated by interfacial electric field for efficient visible-light photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhan, X.; Ou, D.; Zheng, Y.; Li, B.; Xu, L.; Yang, H.; Yang, W.; Zhang, H.; Hou, H.; Yang, W. Boosted photocatalytic hydrogen production over two-dimensional/two-dimensional Ta3N5/ReS2 van der Waals heterojunctions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 629, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shen, Y.; Zhu, H.; Deng, L.; Yang, L.; Shen, Y.; Fan, Q.; Le, Z.; Xie, Z. Heterostructured g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composites as Highly Efficient Photocatalysts for Selective Atmospheric Oxidation of Thiols to Disulfides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 56073–56081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, Y.; Zou, R.; Chen, Z.; Tu, W.; Xia, R.; Iwuoha, E.I.; Peng, X. Engineering a Hydrophobic–Hydrophilic Diphase in a Bi2WO6–C3N4 Heterojunction for Solar-Powered CO2 Reduction. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Coatings 15 00032 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Coatings 15 00032 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of Bi2WO6 (a,b) and g-C3N4 (c,d).
Figure 3. SEM images of Bi2WO6 (a,b) and g-C3N4 (c,d).
Coatings 15 00032 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of 1g-C3N4-Bi2WO6 (a,b), 2g-C3N4-Bi2WO6 (c,d), and 3g-C3N4-Bi2WO6 (e,f), respectively.
Figure 4. SEM images of 1g-C3N4-Bi2WO6 (a,b), 2g-C3N4-Bi2WO6 (c,d), and 3g-C3N4-Bi2WO6 (e,f), respectively.
Coatings 15 00032 g004
Figure 5. FTIR patterns of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Figure 5. FTIR patterns of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Coatings 15 00032 g005
Figure 6. UV–visible absorption and bandgap analysis of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Figure 6. UV–visible absorption and bandgap analysis of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Coatings 15 00032 g006
Figure 7. Photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to CH4 (a) and CO (b).
Figure 7. Photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to CH4 (a) and CO (b).
Coatings 15 00032 g007
Figure 8. Photocurrent response (a) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (b) of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Figure 8. Photocurrent response (a) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (b) of g-C3N4, Bi2WO6 and g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalyst.
Coatings 15 00032 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the photocatalytic CO2 reduction mechanism of the Bi2WO6/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the photocatalytic CO2 reduction mechanism of the Bi2WO6/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst.
Coatings 15 00032 g009
Table 1. Comparison of CO and CH4 production rates in CO2 photoreduction for g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites and some previous studies.
Table 1. Comparison of CO and CH4 production rates in CO2 photoreduction for g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composites and some previous studies.
Title 1Light SourceProductionRef.
g-C3N4/Bi2WO6300 W Xe lamp with λ > 420 nm filterCO: 5.19 μmol/g/h[37]
g-C3N4@UIO66400–800 nmCO: 9.9 μmol/g/h[38]
Amine-g-C3N4300 W Xe lampCH4: 0.34 μmol/g/h[39]
BiOI/g-C3N4300 W Xe lampCO: 3.44 μmol/g/h[40]
g-C3N4/Bi4O5I2300 W Xe lamp with λ > 400 nm filterCO: 45.6 μmol/g/h[41]
Bi2WO6/RGO/
g-C3N4
300 W Xe lamp with λ > 420 nm filterCH4: 2.51 μmol/g/h
CO: 15.93 μmol/g/h
[42]
AgBr/g-C3N4UV light, 365 nmCH4: 30.76 μmol/g/h[43]
WO3/g-C3N48 W Hg LampCO: 14.6[44]
g-C3N4/Bi2WO6300 W Xe lampCH4: 18.90 μmol/g/h
CO: 29.82 μmol/g/h
This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.; Ni, L.; Ogino, K.; Sun, H.; Bi, J.; Hou, H. Engineering g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Coatings 2025, 15, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010032

AMA Style

Chen W, Ni L, Ogino K, Sun H, Bi J, Hou H. Engineering g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Coatings. 2025; 15(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Wenxing, Lingzhe Ni, Kenji Ogino, Hong Sun, Jinghui Bi, and Huilin Hou. 2025. "Engineering g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction" Coatings 15, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010032

APA Style

Chen, W., Ni, L., Ogino, K., Sun, H., Bi, J., & Hou, H. (2025). Engineering g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Coatings, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop