Next Article in Journal
Design and Analysis of Biomedical Scaffolds Using TPMS-Based Porous Structures Inspired from Additive Manufacturing
Next Article in Special Issue
Proteolysis of β-Lactoglobulin Assisted by High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment for Development of Polysaccharides-Peptides Based Coatings and Films
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Artificial Aging on Mechanical Properties of Six Resin Composite Blocks for CAD/CAM Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioactive Edible Films and Coatings Based in Gums and Starch: Phenolic Enrichment and Foods Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Functional and Edible Coatings and Films as Promising Strategies for Developing Dairy Functional Products—A Review on Yoghurt Case

by
Heba Hassan Salama
1,*,†,
Monica Trif
2,†,
Alexandru Vasile Rusu
3,* and
Sourish Bhattacharya
4,*
1
National Research Centre, Dairy Department, Food Industries and Nutrition Research Institute, 33 El-Buhouth St. (Former El-Tahrir St.), Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
2
Food Research Department, Centre for Innovative Process Engineering (CENTIV) GmbH, 28857 Syke, Germany
3
Life Science Institute, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Process Design and Engineering Cell, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar 346002, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Coatings 2022, 12(6), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060838
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022

Abstract

:
Edible coatings and films appear to be a very promising strategy for delivering bioactive compounds and probiotics in food systems when direct incorporation/inoculation is not an option. The production of dairy products has undergone radical modifications thanks to nanotechnology. Despite being a relatively new occurrence in the dairy sector, nanotechnology has quickly become a popular means of increasing the bioavailability and favorable health effects of a variety of bioactive components. The present review describes, in detail, the various processes being practiced worldwide for yoghurt preparation, microencapsulation, and nanotechnology-based approaches for preserving and/or enriching yoghurt with biologically, and its effect on health and in treating various diseases. In the case of yoghurt, as a perfect medium for functional ingredients supplementation, different gums (e.g., alginate, xanthan gum, and gum arabic), alone or in combination with maltodextrin, seem to be excellent coatings materials to encapsulate functional ingredients. Edible coatings and films are ideal carriers of bioactive compounds, such as antioxidants, antimicrobials, flavors, and probiotics, to improve the quality of dairy food products. Yoghurt is regarded as a functional superfood with a variety of health benefits, especially with a high importance for women’s health, as a probiotic. Consumption of yoghurt with certain types of probiotic strains which contain γ-linolenic acid or PUFA can help solve healthy problems or alleviate different symptoms, and this review will be shed light on the latest studies that have focused on the impact of functional yoghurt on women’s health. Recently, it has been discovered that fermented milk products effectively prevent influenza and COVID-19 viruses. Bioactive molecules from yoghurt are quite effective in treating various inflammations, including so-called “cytokine storms” (hypercytokinaemia) caused by COVID-19.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Consumer expectations for higher quality and safer meals are on the rise. Edible coatings improve the quality, stability, and safety of food. Proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides are commonly employed in edible films, either alone or in combination. Edible biopolymers (lipids, polysaccharides, proteins, or a combination of these) and food grade additives are used to obtain edible films and coatings. In recent years, nanotechnology has become increasingly demanded in the applications of coatings, and many applications of nanotechnology have been found in dairy science and technology. [1,2]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has released its risk assessment guidance for nanotechnology and nanoscience applications in the food and feed chain [3]. However, there is a shortage of literature on bioavailability of nanoparticles entering the human system. Although some of the reports clearly show its bioavailability potential, many questions related to its bioavailability are unresolved. Still, little is known what is happening with nanoparticles when they enter the body through. Studies have shown that nanoparticles can overcome biological barriers, but do they dissolve? Do they remain in the body? Do they accumulate? Are they digested or excreted again? Do they trigger chemical reactions? Are remaining still open questions. What is clear, is that the effect depends very much on the size, shape and surface. Soluble and degradable substances behave differently than insoluble ones. Soluble nanoparticles do not remain in their nano-form, and there are currently fewer health concerns with these substances [4]. EFSA is concerned with the safety and risks of nanomaterials in food related application. Scientific opinions and a guidance document on the assessment have been published, and EFSA concludes that reliable analytical procedures, risk characterization methods and data on the behavior of nanoparticles in the body are still lacking. This also includes the assessment of applications for nanotechnology in the food sector (e.g., as novel food). It describes requirements for the analysis of physicochemical properties, exposure assessment, and toxicological studies, among others [3].
Consequently, any use of nanomaterials in food should be looked at closely and assessed on a case-by-case basis. Foods containing nanomaterials are legally regulated by the Novel Foods Regulation [5].

2. Nanotechnology Applications for Food and Dairy Industries

The production of dairy products has undergone radical modifications thanks to nanotechnology [6]. Despite being a relatively new occurrence in the dairy sector, nanotechnology has quickly become a popular means of increasing the bioavailability and favorable health effects of a variety of components. Therefore, nanotechnology has spread in recent years to improve health, taste, and the development of new or improved food and dairy products and technological properties, and yoghurt, as a relevant example, will be further discussed in this review.
In nanotechnology, the use of nanomaterials with nanoscale structures is ranging from 1 to 100 nm, and integrates several disciplines such as biotechnology, chemistry, physics, and engineering [7]. Nanotechnology is concerned with the characterization, fabrication, and manipulation of biological and non-biological structures with dimensions less than 100 nanometers. This scale of structures has been shown to have unique and novel functional properties [8].
To improve the nutritional value of milk, yogurt, and cheese, a variety of nanofunctional substances have been reported to be added. Table 1 summarizes the various applications of nanotechnology in dairy and food products as described and adapted from Neethirajan and Jayas [9].
Figure 1 presents of some most common applications of nanotechnology in food and dairy products, using encapsulation/coating techniques and systems, such as coacervation [22], spray-drying [23], coated liposomes [24], spray-dried coated liposomes [25], and crosslinking gelation of emulsions (oil-in-water, gel-in-water, etc.) [13,18,26].
Hydrogels, in particular, are very well suited to immobilization. They provide the porous, three-dimensional network needed to hold the cells in place. The requirements for the hydrogel are, of course, biocompatibility and the ability to create the hydrogel network under mild conditions [27].
Micelles are known to be more utilized for preparation of nanomaterials having a size of 5–100 nm. They are formed when emulsifiers (emulsifiers allow water and oil to mix) are dissolved in water. Inside the micelle, materials having much affinity of fat fat-loving substances, e.g., certain vitamins can be coated/encapsulated and, thus, made water-soluble. Liposomes look similar to micelles, and consist of lecithin, which is obtained from eggs or soy. One difference to the micelle is that they have a double-layered shell and water-soluble substances can also be encapsulated inside them [28].
An emulsion is when drops of oil are dispersed in water (as in milk) or drops of water in oil (margarine). When very fine oil droplets are dispersed in water, it is called a nanoemulsion. Nanoemulsions are interesting for the development of low-fat foods [18,29]. Nanocapsules and nanoemulsions consist of substances that have been approved and tested for food production. Furthermore, they are soluble and biodegradable and, according to current knowledge, do not give rise to any health concerns [30].
Figure 1. Different applications of nanotechnology in food industry and dairy products (Adapted from Nile et al. [31]).
Figure 1. Different applications of nanotechnology in food industry and dairy products (Adapted from Nile et al. [31]).
Coatings 12 00838 g001
Many applications of nanotechnology have been developed in dairy science and technology. Important bioactive compounds, such as vitamins, minerals, or flavorings, can be surrounded/coated by nanostructured biomaterials and thus “encapsulated”. These capsules/beadlets/beads protect bioactive substances, allowing sensitive substances to be processed more efficiently compounds through improving the bioavailability of the critical nutrients [32,33,34,35], such as iron on milk proteins (whey protein), through preparing various forms of nanomaterials desired in the manufacturing process of various dairy products. Biofortification with iron - iron is lacking in dairy and its products, and it must be ensured that it reaches human bodies in the required concentrations during digestion and absorption, without being impeded by other food components or altered by other manufacturing transactions or situations [1,2].

3. New Strategy for Developing Yoghurt as Functional Food

3.1. Different Forms of Yoghurt

Yogurt is a fermented dairy product created by two types of lactic acid bacteria, primarily Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. Without the use of rennet, this fermentation causes acidification and coagulation, as well as an increase in shelf life due to the low pH. [36]. Many studies have looked into supplementing probiotic strains to yogurt in addition to the standard starter culture to boost the health benefits. Bio-yoghurt or functional yoghurt is the resultant yoghurt with probiotic bacteria [37]. Probiotic bacteria are defined as living microorganisms administered in a sufficient number to survive in the intestinal ecosystem, and must have a positive effect on the host [38].
Set-type or firm, frozen, sipping, stirred, powder, or concentrated, are texture classifications; natural, flavored, sweetened, or with added bits of fruits (fresh or dried) or honey are flavor classifications; fat and lactose residual content are shelf life and nutritional value classifications [39]. There’s also a classification based on health advantages. Weerathilake et al. [40] have also reviewed the many varieties of yoghurt. It was based on physical and chemical properties, as well as added flavors and post-incubation treatments. El-Sayed et al. [41] recently used spray drying to make functional yoghurt powder and studied the survival of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32.

3.2. Materials Used in the Manufacture of Yoghurt

A number of ingredients are needed to produce yoghurt, including starter, stabilizers, sweetener materials, fruits, and flavorings. In the yoghurt industry, yoghurt and yoghurt starters are among the most important ingredients, if not the most important. To obtain good sensory, chemical, and microbiological yoghurt, high-quality milk must be utilized. Different gums, e.g., alginate, xanthan gum, or gum arabic alone or in combination with maltodextrin, can be used as excellent coatings materials and can be proved as functional ingredients in yoghurts, not only as stabilizers or fat replacers, but as prebiotics as well. The type of milk used in yoghurt production is determined by the type of civet to be produced [40]. To fulfill the demands and expectations of some groups of customers in the community, yoghurt can also be manufactured from non-dairy milk or plant milk [42]. Coconut, soy or peanut milk, coconut with hemp milk, combined cow milk and coconut milk, barley milk, rice, guardar cereal, almonds, and other plant sources can be considered great functional components in the preparation of yoghurts.

3.3. Yoghurt Production

The principal methods of manufacturing yoghurt in traditional ways are by adding starter cultures (Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus). Many additives can be added to yoghurt, especially if the purpose is to make a functional and healthy yoghurt. Desired additives are added to yoghurt throughout the manufacturing process in a very traditional way. Furthermore, Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are an important class of fatty acids, renowned for their health and nutritional benefits for people of all ages, and adding them to yoghurt amplifies those benefits [43]. Bello et al. [44] added Camelina sativa, Echium plantagineum, flaxseed, blackcurrant, and raspberry to milk prepared for the manufacturing of yoghurt before the fermentation process. However, the reports suggested that high content of α-linolenic acid in flaxseed and black currant oils can be capitalized through using it in yoghurt. Many other kind of fiber sources have been added, which has improved the texture, such as the addition of coconut flour [45,46,47], a great source of fiber, antioxidants, phenols, and probiotic bacteria for bio-yoghurt, with a distinct taste and smell and suitable for inclusion in a school meal for children. The yoghurt fortified with minerals to enhance the nutritional benefits, along with addition of the minerals in nanoparticles form, such as selenium, that is prepared by biological method using lactic acid bacteria as green nanotechnology may be a different class of yoghurt having maximum nutritional value [48].
The main starter culture used in yoghurt preparation are Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaris. Further, the main stabilizers used in yoghurt preparation are alginates (carageenan), gelatins, gums (locust bean, guar), pectins, and starch. However, plain yoghurts are not good in taste; therefore, in order to add taste in it, sweeteners, such as sucrose, saccharine, Acesulfame-K, and Aspartame, are added to it. In some cases, maple syrup is also added to the yoghurt. However, some are allergic to natural sweeteners, and, in such cases, artificial sweeteners are added to it. Moreover, a fact that should be taken care is of shelf life of yoghurt which is always less. As a result, preservatives must be added to extend the shelf life of the yoghurt. Sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and natamycin are examples of chemical preservatives. Natural preservatives, such as nisin and -polylysine, on the other hand, can be utilized to extend the shelf life of yoghurt. To increase the quality of the yoghurt, skimmed milk powder, whey powder, inulin, fruits, casein powder, and vitamins are sometimes added.

3.4. Yoghurt as Functional Food

Apart from vitamins and minerals-based supplements, probiotic yoghurts are also frequently used as functional foods by wellness-oriented people. In addition, supplementation of dairy products with selenium after preparing it in the form of nano using biological methods or green nanotechnology [49] is important. Furthermore, incorporation of suitable fatty acids on milk proteins can lead to developing a complex protein very similar to HAMLT (Human α-lactalbumin Made Lethal to Kill Tumor Cell), which has the ability to kill cancer cells selectively without damaging healthy cells [50,51,52,53]. Nano-emulsions are also used for delivery of important bioactive compounds that have important health and therapeutic effects, such as beta-carotene and omega-3 [49,54]. Carotenes normally only dissolve in fat and not in water. In the production of the nanoscale dye, the color particles are coated/surrounded by a shell of starch. Thus, they can also be used in watery foods and color the beverage yellow-orange. As innovations, nanoproducts to color food or filter materials would be conceivable in principle. In addition, the encapsulation of aroma particles in nanoparticles, for example, can enable the aroma to develop at the desired time [55].
Health properties can be increased, as well as many important ingredients, such as dietary fiber lacking in dairy products, antioxidants, phenols, and residual fatty acids by incorporating coconut flour. The frozen yoghurt supplemented with coconut flour nanoparticles has been prepared with green nanotechnology and probiotic bacteria. Coconut flour nanoparticles operate as a prebiotic and boost the activity of the starting culture as well as probiotic bacteria strains. It was discovered that adding it to frozen yoghurt combinations in various proportions with probiotic bacteria present increases its activity and improves the sensory and technological aspects of the final product [56]. Yogurt was added to ethanol sage extract as a good source of phenols after encapsulating phenols in the form of liposomes, and this addition significantly influenced the yoghurt’s chemical and rheological properties, as well as the growth of the starter culture and probiotic bacteria [57]. Sprout nano-powdered have been used in the production of yoghurt to boost health benefits. According to Ahn et al. [56], this resulted in a decrease in pH compared to peanut powder, and a yoghurt with an increase antioxidant content [58]. The concentration of less than 0.1% was sensorily acceptable to the consumer and also suitable for microbial growth. Chitosan nanoparticles powder yoghurt had been proven to have no effect on chemical, sensory, or rheological properties [59]. Chitosan nanoparticle powder added to yoghurt is aimed to increase features and properties that are beneficial in the treatment of certain diseases, as evidenced by much research [59,60]. An enhanced qualities of ginseng have been obtained when it was synthesized as a nanopowder and yoghurt was produced using it as supplement, which has functional properties and represents an active ingredient in the production of functional yoghurt [60]. Egg shells are an unusual calcium booster that has been shown to be beneficial to dental and bone Various researchers have observed that preparing eggshell in nano-form enhances calcium bioavailability in clinical trials [60]. However, as compared to the control (regular—not in nanoform) yoghurt, the nutritional representation of calcium discovered in the form of nanopowder performed better in terms of chemical and sensory qualities [61,62]. Santillan-Urquiza et al. [63] used a set-type yoghurt to add two different quantities of iron oxide, zinc oxide, and calcium phosphate nanoparticles.
Yoghurt is one of the most important dairy products that can be eaten for different age groups and available in different forms in the markets whether it is plain or flavored with different form such as stirred drink (drinkable) or set [64,65]. Due to the high cost of medical treatment, particularly for chronic conditions, those have become more prevalent in recent years. Foods that have the ability to improve health status and prevent diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s, and other disorders affecting women’s health have recently piqued researchers’ interest [66,67,68,69]. Probiotics are referred to as ‘live microorganisms, which, when administered in inadequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host [70]. The majority of commercial probiotics are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species used in products such as yoghurt and fermented products, milk powder, and frozen desserts [71,72,73]. Lactobacillus acidophilus is a type of beneficial bacteria that can be found in the body naturally, most commonly in the intestines, mouth, and female genitals, and it is recommended that women who suffer yeast and bacterial infections eat yoghurt with this probiotic. Moreover, L. acidophilus produces lactase, and vitamin K, which is important for bone strength and blood clotting. [74,75]
It has been known that probiotics have many health benefits, such as antimicrobial activity, alleviating diarrhea, anticarcinogenic properties, high serum cholesterol, allergic, HIV diseases, and improving lactose intolerance and immune system [76,77]. Furthermore, the medical applications of nano-toothpastes, have demonstrated antimicrobial and remineralization effectiveness [78,79].
Fermented milk products have gone through various developments and stages. The manufacture of fermented dairy was primarily intended to increase the conservation period and then to discover its benefits in relation to increasing its nutritional value for improving human health [80]. Various fruits, herbs, and plant sources rich in fibers, antioxidants, phenols, and other compounds, either free or coated, are sometimes added to yoghurt to make up for a lack of milk, or to improve the quality of food matrix for the development of edible coatings or films, so that the consumer can consume an integrated diet rich in all elements [81,82,83,84]. With technological developments, ultra-filtration technology has added new products to the yoghurt market, especially pre- and post-COVID-19; probiotics were considered by consumers to be a booster to the immune system, yoghurt fortified with added nutrition [85,86,87]. For probiotic bacteria and bioactive compounds which are affected by the environmental conditions through the digestive tract and during the various product manufacturing steps, the microencapsulation technology represents a good solution for that [88,89]. Coating materials are selected based on the specific functional component features as well as the type of application final products. In the case of yoghurt, as a perfect medium for functional ingredients supplementation, different gums (e.g., xanthan gum, guar gum, and gum arabic), alone or in combination with maltodextrin, seem to be excellent coatings materials to encapsulate functional ingredients. The coating material protects the microorganism by controlling stress response mechanisms against the gastric environment, which include gas exchange, moisture, oxidative reaction rates, solute migration, and so on. However, it does provide some protection from harmful external conditions such as UV light and heat. Many technical approaches based on physical and chemical principles have been investigated for probiotic microorganism microencapsulation. Nanotechnology and its different forms have begun to be used to obtain products with functional health properties that have no effect on taste, composition, or other final product properties [90]. Continuous progress on much technologies research is ongoing, the most important of which is human health and satisfying consumer needs to find various products that meet desired needs and interests, along with having distinctive qualities that reflect on health and activity and protect from chronic diseases. Lately, many studies have focused on clinical investigations of fermented dairy products, particularly yoghurt, in recent years due to its features as a pleasant, healthy drink that is popular and acceptable to people of all ages in various societies [91,92].
Probiotics are meant to play crucial role in human health. In this regard, microencapsulation and nanoencapsulation for edible packaging techniques offer efficient strategy in protecting and at the same time increasing the quality of the probiotic species. Probiotic microencapsulation stands out as a promising alternative for replacing antibiotics through beneficial microorganisms. However, such a process would be providing an option of gradual release of compounds of interest for preserving food [93,94].
One of the most popular materials for storing bacteria is alginate. If one brings a solution of alginic acid in water with a solution that contains calcium ions, this leads to cross-linking of the alginic acid and the formation of a hydrogel. In this context, many works deal with the immobilization of probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. These bacteria are those found in yoghurt. The reason is to improve the survival of the bacteria in the human digestive tract, in order to increase the positive effects of these bacteria. L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus have been entrapped in an optimized hydrogel Ca-alginate system [95].
Researchers have also exploited the potential of utilizing modified starches along with mixture of probiotic cultures (Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103, and L. acidophilus DSM 20079) at an initial concentration of 12.9 log·CFUmL-1 [96]. Further, probiotics incorporated with natural products have emerged as an effective edible packaging material which have the potential to replace the chemical preservatives for food preservation.
There has been a rise in health and food awareness as a result of the spread of social media and the availability of internet networks that have turned the world into a tiny village [69]. The majority of consumers who are concerned about having a healthy lifestyle prefer to drink milk and dairy products, with yoghurt being the most popular [68]. However, advantages of consuming yoghurt continually include evading the bad side effects of antibiotics; supplementing vitamins as vitamin B (B-2, B-12) [97]; balancing sugar in blood [98]; cancer prevention, digestive diseases and infections; preventing diarrhea; and maintaining a healthy intestinal environment; high in conjugated linoleic acid [99]. Moreover, yoghurt is beneficial to women’s health. Lactobacillus spp. found in yoghurt helps to prevent candida and vaginitis in the vaginal area. According to studies, women who take yoghurt on a regular basis have improved vaginal health. Yogurt should be consumed on a daily basis, based on the benefits listed above [100,101].

4. Effect of Yoghurt Manufacture Technology on Health

Yogurt has a number of beneficial effects on human health, particularly when consumed on a daily and consistent basis, as shown in Figure 2 [102]. Probiotics are living and active bacteria found in fermented dairy products, particularly yogurt. These bacteria have been demonstrated to promote gut health by favoring the growth of “preferred” bacteria over “undesirable” bacteria. One of the most significant technological advancements in the production of yoghurt has been the development of healthy yoghurt that has a clear influence on the diseases of the time, either by preventing injury or by improving the condition and lowering the symptoms associated with injury. Alzheimer’s disease is one of the most common age-related diseases, and the most important and recent studies on the condition will be discussed, with yoghurt content on probiotics as a beneficial form of disease protection and treatment.

4.1. Yoghurt for Alzheimer Treatment

Numerous studies have shown that fermented dairy products, which contain lactic acid bacteria, fatty acids, and peptides generated during fermentation, have a variety of physiological benefits. Recent research has shown that fermented dairy products have an impact on cognitive function as well as a preventive role against dementia [103]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most chronic and slow-progressing neurodegenerative disorders that has been discovered to date. The benefits of utilizing lactic acid bacteria and other probiotic strains with anti-oxidant capabilities and that produce Acetyl Choline against D-Galactose-induced Alzheimer’s disease were discussed by Mehta et al. [104]. L. plantarum MTCC 1325 also generates antioxidants and Acetyl cholinesterase, which possesses anti-characteristics Alzheimer’s against induced D-Galactose, according to Mehta et al. [104]. Nimgampalle & Kuna [105] conducted another investigation to evaluate the capabilities of the L. plantarum MTCC 1325 strain against D-Galactose-induced Alzheimer’s disease in albino rats. The findings revealed that the AD model group had morphometric, behavioral, and ACh levels that were much lower, as well as pathological markers such as amyloid plaques and tangles. The AD group treated for 60 days with L. plantarum MTCC1325 improved cognition and restored ACh and histopathological characteristics to the control group. However, in the group treated with L. plantarum alone, no significant effects were detected [104]. According to the findings, L. plantarum MTCC1325 may have anti-Alzheimer characteristics when used to treat D-Galactose-induced Alzheimer’s disease [106].
Researchers have also proven that incorporating fermented dairy into one’s diet lowers the risk of dementia, as Ogata et al. [107] found. Some publications have also connected Alzheimer’s disease to metabolic impairments that can be addressed with probiotics, according to clinical data. Probiotics such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus fermentum) were reported to improve cognitive function and metabolism after 12 weeks of ingestion [108]. Ton et al. [109] published a study that found kefir to be beneficial to patients with dementia. Elderly people were fed with milk fermented in kefir for 90 days (2 mL/kg/daily) and the results showed that it improved cognitive disability associated with three key factors in Alzheimer’s disease: systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and blood cell damage, and it can be considered a promising treatment for the disease’s progression. Mustafa et al. [69] investigated the protective effects of emulsified yoghurt enhanced with Ashwagandha ethanolic extract (AEE) and probiotic bacteria in rats exposed to Aluminum Chloride (AlCl3). The findings of this investigation revealed that AEE and probiotics improved physicochemical, microbiological, sensory, and health advantages by reversing AlCl3-induced hepato–renal–neuro deterioration; they are a viable supplement for toxicity protection. In addition, Khalil et al. [68] used coconut oil as a non-fermented dairy product to generate an edible dairy formula that provided neuroprotection against aluminum chloride-induced Alzheimer’s disease in rats. The dairy formula supplemented with coconut oil was found to have the ability to improve cognitive deficiencies linked with Alzheimer’s disease in this investigation.

4.2. Yoghurt Consumptions for Women Health

Women are the backbone of society and an important and influential member; they account for roughly half of the population and give birth to the other half. Women in disadvantaged communities and developing countries shoulder a lot of responsibilities and tasks, which is bad for their health and goes against their physical nature [92]. As a result, caring for women’s health is critical and is dependent on the health of the rest of the community. The community, organizations, and other segments of society should pay special attention to women.

Premenstrual Syndrome

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a psychotic euro endocrine illness having biological, psychological, and social components [110]. PMS is characterized as a recurrence of a mix of disruptive physical, psychological, and behavioral changes that interfere with familial, social, and vocational activities during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle [111]. The American Psychiatric Association first identified PMS in 1987 as Luteal Dysfunctional Disorders, and it was later classed as Dysfunctional Premenstrual Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [112] in 1992, along with other symptoms such as anxiety. Have been reported physical symptoms, such as breast tenderness, flatulence, abdominal pain, weight gain, edema, headache, back pain, nausea, bowel movements, and acne, as well as psychotic symptoms, such as irritability, anxiety, nervousness, depression, excessive tiredness and weakness, nausea, bowel movements, and acne, and psychotic symptoms, such as irritability, anxiety, nervousness, depression, excessive tiredness and weakness, confusion, changes in mood, sleep pattern, and appetite [113,114,115,116]. PMS symptoms can lead to a variety of issues, including physical disability, mental illness, and severe functioning impairment in social and occupational settings for women. Adolescents’ symptoms can have a significant impact on their academic performance and social connections. Adolescents with PMS have also been demonstrated to have poor health [117]. According to DSMIV-TR in India, prevalence of PMS is 18.4%, moderate to severe PMS is 14.7% and PMDD is 3.7% [118]. The symptoms commonly reported were “fatigue/lack of energy”, “decrease interest in work”, and “anger/irritability.” The most common functional impairment item was “school/work efficiency and productivity”. PSST have 90.9% sensitivity, 57.01% specificity, and 97.01% predictive value of negative test [119]. Many women have premenstrual syndrome (PMS) during their working lives. PMS in working Egyptian women, on the other hand, has received less attention. Hammam et al. [120] discovered that PMS is more common among female academic teaching staff at Zagazig University, and that they are more likely to have reduced work capacity and performance, as well as perceive work to aggravate symptoms. Yogurt also contains a lot of calcium, potassium, protein, phosphorus, magnesium, zinc, and vitamin B12. Women who regularly consume yoghurt have a better diet quality than women who do not consume yoghurt [121]. Consumption of yoghurt on a regular basis is linked to reduced blood pressure, blood glucose, and lipid levels, as well as decreased insulin resistance, when compared to people with orthorexia [122,123]. Women who eat yoghurt are less likely to develop chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease.
When bacteria colonize the gastrointestinal system, a critical barrier between the human and the environment is developed, protecting the individual from sickness [124]. The gut microbiota can be improved when probiotics, or live health-promoting organisms, are taken in insufficient levels to remain viable after passing through the gastrointestinal tract. Several Lactobacillus species, notably L. delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus, which is commonly used in traditional yoghurt, have been shown to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria, increase immunological function, and improve the bioavailability of food components and minerals. According to epidemiological study [125], there are strong links between yoghurt consumption and lower BMI, body weight, body weight increase, body fat, and smaller waist circumference. Consumers have reported a variety of therapeutic results from probiotic milk products prepared with particular bacteria [126]. Rad et al. [127] discovered a substantial link between PMS and lifestyle, BMI, and food intake. Using the correct nutraceuticals can help to alleviate the symptoms to some extent. In this scenario, the optimum method is to give a probiotic yoghurt with Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus helveticus, as well as conjugated γ-linoleneic acid. The probiotic cultures in the yoghurt will aid in the reduction of BMI in PMS patients, and the γ-linoleneic acid will be beneficial in the treatment of PMS in women. Filho et al. [128] evaluated the efficacy of fatty acids for the treatment of PMS using a graded symptom scale as well as the effect on prolactin levels in plasma and cholesterol. The results of this study showed that patients who used the drug containing the active ingredient experienced a significant improvement in symptoms. Furthermore, it was discovered that the majority of women who consumed solely probiotic bacteria (L. acidophilus and B. bifidum) had their menstrual cycle severity reduced from severe to mild [129]. Lactobacillus plantarum has the ability to transform unsaturated free fatty acids into linoleic acid and less harmful conjugated fatty acids by growing them. According to Aziz et al. [130], L. plantarum 2–3 was discovered to be the prospective strain that demonstrated the most growth and conversion of LA to distinct metabolites out of all six L. plantarum strains.

5. Research Recommendations and Personalization Perspectives

Yoghurt has so many health benefits that many health-conscious people consume it on a daily basis. Each year, new research is published that adds to already available understanding of the health benefits of consuming yoghurt. Developing probiotic yoghurt containing γ-linolenic acid is an effective way to treat pre-menstrual syndrome in women and also serves as nutraceutical for improving women health [131]. However, such probiotic yoghurt generally has a very low shelf-life period. Hence, using natural preservatives, the shelf life of probiotics will be improved [132]. Developing probiotic yoghurt containing γ-linolenic acid and natural food preservative is important for women’s health and feeding the women community with such type of probiotics will drive the country’s future towards its betterment [128,133].
Advances in genomics, epigenomics, and proteomics have opened new perspectives in a second revolution in this field, allowing scientists to decipher the precise mechanisms of action of gut bacteria. Metagenomics sequencing technologies, which are now accessible, are analogous technological advances in that they allow scientists to quickly capture the complexity of microbiomes and investigate invisible microbes without having to isolate and extract them. The goal of today’s research is to figure out how major probiotic-containing products that target gut health work. Scientific and technical advancements in the gut microbiome sector promise a new method for selecting the next generation of probiotics -called ‘precise probiotics’. Precision probiotics will deliver to the gut activities or functionalities that the gut microbiota or one’s own genes do not have the capacity to give. While creating precision probiotics, parameters such as diet, phenotype, lifestyle, age, gender, genetics, and microbiome of the beneficiaries should be taken into account [134,135]. In this context, researchers need to innovate the efficient gut-healthy diets and foods that would be consumed by the humans globally. Due to the wide variation in gut microbiome composition among individuals, it is important to recruit numerous worldwide cohorts in order to complete a full mapping of the gut microbiome using dietary data. It is most crucial to find a program to analyze the gut microbiome composition and function using whole metagenome sequencing, which is the most recent sequencing technique [136,137].
Modern techniques of modulating the gut microbiota are intensively researched, with a focus on the health advantages mediated by coated/encapsulated/immobilized prebiotics/probiotics/bioactive ingredients. Co-encapsulation/coating is used to increase oral delivery and ensure stability and viability, as well as targeted release in the intestine of bioactives. Incorporating probiotics and prebiotics, such as PUFAs, phytochemicals, dietary fibers, and nutrients delivered by single matrix into functional foods, can provide health advantages by modulating the gut microbiota [138,139,140,141,142].
The detection of nanoparticles in food or in any other product presents many difficulties [143]. At this moment, international researchers are exploring different analytical methods for quantification of nanoparticles in food. It is quite possible that dairy food and other products are labelled or advertised as “nano”. However, it is often not clear whether they are really “nano”. In future, it must be evident on foodstuffs in the list of ingredients whether nano-sized substances are contained [144].
Lactobacillus in yoghurt may have negative impact, but, rarely, in people with weakened immune system. It is preferable for people with weakened immune system to consume lower amounts of yoghurt.

6. Conclusions

Yoghurt, one of the best sources of probiotics due to being made from fermented milk, has undergone radical modifications thanks to nanotechnology. Various processes are practiced worldwide for yoghurt preparation, microencapsulation, and nanotechnology-based approaches for preserving and/or enriching yoghurt with biologically, and its effect on health and in treating various diseases. Yoghurt is a perfect medium for functional ingredients supplementation, and edible coatings and films are ideal carriers of bioactive such as antioxidants, antimicrobials, flavors, and probiotics to improve the quality of dairy food products. Yoghurt has always been considered as a functional superfood with a variety of health benefits, especially with a high importance on women health for treating premenstrual syndrome. However, in some cases consuming too much yoghurt by people have weakened immune system may have negative impact on their health. Recently, in one of the reports, it was also discovered that fermented milk products effectively prevent influenza and COVID-19 viruses. Bioactive molecules from yoghurt are quite effective in treating various inflammations, including so-called “cytokine storms” (hypercytokinaemia) caused by COVID-19.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.H.S. and S.B.; writing—review and editing, H.H.S., M.T., A.V.R. and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by a grant from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-1723 and PFE 14, within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt. S.B. acknowledges Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for providing CSIR Fast Track Translational Research Project (MLP 0049). S.B. also acknowledges Director, CSIR-CSMCRI for allowing us to work on probiotics especially for women health.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hassan, Z.M.R.; Awad, R.A.; El-Sayed, M.M.; Salama, H.H.; Otzen, D. Application of nanotechnology using whey protein concentrates to improve bioavailability of Iron. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2011, 6, 235–255. [Google Scholar]
  2. El-Sayed, M.M.; Hassan, Z.M.R.; Foda, M.I.; Awad, R.A.; Salama, H.H. Chitosan-whey protein complex (CS-WP) as delivery systems to improve bioavailability of iron. Int. J. Appl. Pure Sci. Agric. 2015, 1, 34–46. [Google Scholar]
  3. EFSA guidelines for the assessment of nanomaterials in the food and animal feed chain form the basis for risk assessment. EFSA J. 2018, 16, 7.
  4. Jeevanandam, J.; Barhoum, A.; Chan, Y.S.; Dufresne, A.; Danquah, M.K. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: History, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1050–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Novel Foods Regulation (EU) 2015/2008. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R2283&from=IT (accessed on 28 February 2022).
  6. Sharma, C.; Dhiman, R.; Rokana, N.; Panwar, H. Nanotechnology: An Untapped Resource for Food Packaging. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Braicu, C.; Gulei, D.; Raduly, L.; Harangus, A.; Rusu, A.; Berindan-Neagoe, I. Altered expression of miR-181 affects cell fate and targets drug resistance-related mechanisms. Mol. Asp. Med. 2019, 70, 90–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sandoval, B. Perspectives on FDA’s regulation of nanotechnology: Emerging challenges and potential solutions. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009, 8, 375–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neethirajan, S.; Jayas, D.S. Nanotechnology for the food and bioprocessing industries. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Siemer, S.; Hahlbrock, A.; Vallet, C.; McClements, D.J.; Balszuweit, J.; Voskuhl, J.; Docter, D.; Wessler, S.; Knauer, S.K.; Westmeier, D.; et al. Nanosized food additives impact beneficial and pathogenic bacteria in the human gut: A simulated gastrointestinal study. npj Sci. Food 2018, 2, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ameta, S.K.; Rai, A.K.; Hiran, D.; Ameta, R.; Ameta, S.C. Use of Nanomaterials in Food Science. In Biogenic Nano-Particles and Their Use in Agro-Ecosystems; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 457–488. [Google Scholar]
  12. Subramani, T.; Ganapathyswamy, H. An overview of liposomal nano-encapsulation techniques and its applications in food and nutraceutical. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 3545–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rusu, A.V.; Criste, F.L.; Mierliţă, D.; Socol, C.T.; Trif, M. Formulation of Lipoprotein Microencapsulated Beadlets by Ionic Complexes in Algae-Based Carbohydrates. Coatings 2020, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jampilek, J.; Kos, J.; Kralova, K. Potential of Nanomaterial Applications in Dietary Supplements and Foods for Special Medical Purposes. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Singh, T.; Shukla, S.; Kumar, P.; Wahla, V.; Bajpai, V.K.; Rather, I.A. Application of Nanotechnology in Food Science: Perception and Overview. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Bangar, S.P.; Purewal, S.S.; Trif, M.; Maqsood, S.; Kumar, M.; Manjunatha, V.; Rusu, A.V. Functionality and Applicability of Starch-Based Films: An Eco-Friendly Approach. Foods 2021, 10, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Drago, E.; Campardelli, R.; Pettinato, M.; Perego, P. Innovations in Smart Packaging Concepts for Food: An Extensive Review. Foods 2020, 9, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Trif, M.; Csutak, E.; Perez-Moral, N.; Gagyi, T.; Pintori, D.; Bethke, M.; Wilde, P. TeRiFiQ EU Project: Multiple Gel in Oil in Water Emulsions as Fat Replacers in Sauces and Ready Prepared Foods. Bull. UASVM Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 47–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bajpai, V.K.; Kamle, M.; Shukla, S.; Mahato, D.K.; Chandra, P.; Hwang, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Huh, Y.S.; Han, Y.-K. Prospects of using nanotechnology for food preservation, safety, and security. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Talebian, S.; Wallace, G.G.; Schroeder, A.; Stellacci, F.; Conde, J. Nanotechnology-based disinfectants and sensors for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 618–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gubala, V.; Johnston, L.J.; Krug, H.F.; Moore, C.J.; Ober, C.K.; Schwenk, M.; Vert, M. Engineered nanomaterials and human health: Part 2. Applications and nanotoxicology (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2018, 90, 1325–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. El-Messery, T.M.; El-Said, M.M.; Shahein, N.M.; El-Din, H.M.F.; Farrag, A. Functional yoghurt supplemented with orange peel encapsulated using coacervation technique. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 22, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yadav, K.; Bajaj, R.K.; Mandal, S.; Saha, P.; Mann, B. Evaluation of total phenol content and antioxidant properties of encapsulated grape seed extract in yoghurt. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2018, 71, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. El-Said, M.M.; El-Messery, T.M.; El-Din, H.M.F. The encapsulation of powdered doum extract in liposomes and its application in yoghurt. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2018, 17, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Akgun, D.; Gultekin-Ozguven, M.; Yucetepe, A.; Altin, G.; Gibis, M.; Weiss, J.; Ozcelik, B. Stirred-type yoghurt incorporated with sour cherry extract in chitosan-coated liposomes. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 101, 105532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Moura, S.C.S.R.; Schettini, G.N.; Garcia, A.O.; Gallina, D.A.; Alvim, I.D.; Hubinger, M.D. Stability of hibiscus extract encapsulated by ionic gelation incorporated in yoghurt. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019, 12, 1500–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Osojnik Črnivec, I.G.; Neresyan, T.; Gatina, Y.; Kolmanič Bučar, V.; Skrt, M.; Dogša, I.; Bogovič Matijašić, B.; Kulikova, I.; Lodygin, A.; Poklar Ulrih, N. Polysaccharide Hydrogels for the Protection of Dairy-Related Microorganisms in Adverse Environmental Conditions. Molecules 2021, 26, 7484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Levinson, Y.; Ish-Shalom, S.; Segal, E.; Livney, Y.D. Bioavailability, rheology and sensory evaluation of fat-free yoghurt enriched with VD3 encapsulated in re-assembled casein micelles. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 1477–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ashaolu, T.J. Nanoemulsions for health, food, and cosmetics: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3381–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pateiro, M.; Gómez, B.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Barba, F.J.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Lorenzo, J.M. Nanoencapsulation of Promising Bioactive Compounds to Improve Their Absorption, Stability, Functionality and the Appearance of the Final Food Products. Molecules 2021, 26, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nile, S.H.; Baskar, V.; Selvaraj, D.; Nile, A.; Xiao, J.; Kai, G. Nanotechnologies in Food Science: Applications, Recent Trends, and Future Perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kwak, H.S.; Al Mijan, M.; Ganesan, P. Application of nanomaterials, nano-and microencapsulation to milk and dairy products. In Nano- and Microencapsulation for Foods, 1st ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 273–300. [Google Scholar]
  33. Park, H.S.; Jeon, B.J.; Ahn, J.; Kwak, H.S. Effects of nanocalcium supplemented milk on bone calcium metabolism in ovariectomized rats. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 20, 1266–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Seo, M.H.; Chang, Y.H.; Lee, S.; Kwak, H.S. The physicochemical and sensory properties of milk supplemented with ascorbic acid-soluble nano-chitosan during storage. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2011, 64, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahn, S.I.; Lee, Y.K.; Kwak, H.S. Optimization of water-in-oil-in-water microencapsulated β-galactosidase by response surface methodology. J. Microencapsul. 2013, 30, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Standard for Fermented Milks; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yilmaz-Ersan, L.; Kurdal, E. The production of set-type-bio-yoghurt with commercial probiotic culture. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2014, 5, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gismondo, M.R.; Drago, L.; Lombardi, A. Review of probiotics available to modify gastrointestinal flora. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 1999, 12, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Corrieu, G.; Be’al, C. Yoghurt: The Product and its Manufacture. In The Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 5, pp. 617–624. [Google Scholar]
  40. Weerathilake, W.A.D.V.; Rasika, D.M.D.; Ruwanmali, J.K.U.; Munasinghe, M.A.D.D. The evolution, processing, varieties and health benefits of yoghurt. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2014, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  41. EL-Sayed, S.M.; Salama, H.H.; El-Sayed, M.M. Preparation and properties of functional milk beverage fortified with kiwi pulp and sesame oil. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 609–618. [Google Scholar]
  42. McClements, D.J.; Newman, E.; McClements, I.F. Plant-Based Milks: A Review of the Science Underpinning Their Design, Fabrication, and Performance. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 2047–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zahran, H.; Mabrouk, A.M.M.; Salama, H.H. Evaluation of Yoghurt Fortified with Encapsulated Echium Oil Rich in Stearidonic Acid as a Low-Fat Dairy Food. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022, 65, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dal Bello, B.; Torri, L.; Piochi, M.; Zeppa, G. Healthy yoghurt fortified with n-3 fatty acids from vegetable sources. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 8375–8385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Salama, H.H.; Abdelhamid, S.M.; El Dairouty, R.K. Coconut bio-yoghurt Phytochemical-Chemical and antimicrobial-microbial activities. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 22, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Salama, H.H.; Abdelhamid, S.M.; Abd-Rabou, N.S. Probiotic Frozen Yoghurt Supplemented with Coconut Flour Green Nanoparticles. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2020, 16, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Salama, H.H.; El-Said, M.M.; Abdelhamid, S.M.; Abozed, S.S.; Mounier, M.M. Effect of Fortification with Sage Loaded Liposomes on the Chemical, Physical, Microbiological Properties and Cytotoxicity of Yoghurt. Egypt. J. Chem. 2020, 63, 3879–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Salama, H.H.; El-Sayed, H.S.; Abd-Rabou, N.S.; Hassan, Z.R. Production and use of eco-friendly selenium nanoparticles in the fortification of yoghurt. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Salama, H.H.; Abd El-Salam, M.H.; El-Sayed, M.M. Preparation of ß-carotene enriched nanoemulsion by spontaneous emulsification using oleic acid as nano carrier. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 585–593. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hassan, Z.M.R.; Awad, R.A.; El-Sayed, M.M.; Foda, M.I.; Otzen, D.; Salama, H.H. Interaction between Whey Protein Nanoparticles and Fatty Acids. Integr. Food Nutr. Metab. 2014, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bangar, S.P.; Siroha, A.K.; Nehra, M.; Trif, M.; Ganwal, V.; Kumar, S. Structural and Film-Forming Properties of Millet Starches: A Comparative Study. Coatings 2021, 11, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salama, H.H.; Foda, M.I.; El-Sayed, M.M.; Hassan, Z.M.R.; Awad, R.A.; Otzen, D. Characteristic and cytotoxic activity of different α-Lactalbumin/fatty acids nanocomplex. Am. Int. J. Contemp. Sci. Res. 2015, 2, 200–207. [Google Scholar]
  53. Trif, M.; Socaciu, C. Evaluation of effiency, release and oxidation stability of sea buckthorn microencapsulated oil using Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Chem. Listy 2008, 102, 1198–1199. [Google Scholar]
  54. Coronel-Aquilera, C.P.; Martin-Gonzalez, M.F.S. Encapsulation of spray dried β-carotene emulsion by fluized bed coating technology. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ahn, Y.J.; Ganesan, P.; Kwak, H.S. Comparison of nanopowdered and powdered peanut sprout-added yoghurt on its physicochemical and sensory properties during storage. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2012, 32, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ahn, Y.J.; Ganesan, P.; Kwak, H.S. Comparison of polyphenol content and antiradical scavenging activity in methanolic extract of nanopowdered and powdered peanut sprouts. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2012, 55, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seo, M.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Chang, Y.H.; Kwak, H.S. Physicochemical, microbial, and sensory properties of yoghurt supplemented with nanopowdered chitosan during storage. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 5907–5916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Park, J.H.; Hong, E.K.; Ahn, J.; Kwak, H.S. Properties of nanopowdered chitosan and its cholesterol lowering effect in rats. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 19, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Seo, M.H.; Park, J.H.; Kwak, H.S. Antidiabetic activity of nanopowdered chitosan in db/db mice. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 19, 1245–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, S.B.; Ganesan, P.; Kwak, H.S. Comparison of nanopowdered and powdered ginseng-added yoghurt on its physicochemical and sensory properties during storage. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2013, 33, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Schaafsma, A.; Beelen, G.M. Eggshell powder, a comparable or better source of calcium than purified calcium carbonate: Piglet studies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1596–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mijan, M.A.; Lee, Y.K.; Kim, D.H.; Kwak, H.S. Effects of Nanopowdered Eggshell on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Rat Study. Master’s Thesis, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  63. Santillán-Urquiza, E.; Méndez-Rojas, M.Á.; Vélez-Ruiz, J.F. Fortification of yoghurt with nano and micro sized calcium, iron and zinc, effect on the physicochemical and rheological properties. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 80, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fisberg, M.; Machado, R. History of yoghurt and current patterns of consumption. Nutr. Rev. 2015, 73, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. El-Sayed, H.S.; Salama, H.H.; Edris, A.E. Survival of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 in spray dried functional yoghurt powder during processing and storage. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 19, 461–467. [Google Scholar]
  66. Winblad, B.; Amouyel, P.; Andrieu, S.; Ballard, C.; Brayne, C.; Brodaty, H.; Cedazo-Minguez, A.; Dubois, B.; Edvardsson, D.; Feldman, H.; et al. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: A priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 455–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ano, Y.; Ayabe, T.; Kutsukake, T.; Ohya, R.; Takaichi, Y.; Uchida, S.; Yamada, K.; Uchida, K.; Takashima, A.; Nakayama, H. Novel lactopeptides in fermented dairy products improve memory function and cognitive decline. Neurobiol. Aging 2018, 72, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Khalil, H.M.A.; Salama, H.H.; Al-Mokaddem, A.K.; Aljuaydi, S.H.; Edris, A.E. Edible dairy formula fortified with coconut oil for neuroprotection against aluminium chloride-induced Alzheimer’s disease in rats. J. Funct. Foods. 2020, 75, 104296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mustafa, M.A.; Ashry, M.; Salama, H.H.; Abdelhamid, S.M.; Hassan, L.K.; Abdel-Wahhab, K.G. Amelioration Role of Ashwagandha/Probiotics Fortified Yoghurt against AlCl3 Toxicity in Rats. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 15, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. FAO/WHO. Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. In Probiotics in Food Health and Nutritional Properties and Guidelines for Evaluation; Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria; FAO/WHO: Cordoba, Argentina, 1–4 October 2001; FAO: Rome, Italy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  71. Shah, N.P. Functional cultures and health benefits. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 1262–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tamime, A.Y.; Robinson, R.K. Yoghurt Science and Technology; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001; p. 619. [Google Scholar]
  73. Misra, S.; Mohanty, D.; Mohapatra, S. Applications of Probiotics as a Functional Ingredient in Food and Gut Health. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 7, 213–223. [Google Scholar]
  74. Szilagyi, A.; Ishayek, N. Lactose Intolerance, Dairy Avoidance, and Treatment Options. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, Consolidated Version. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/432/2021-05-17 (accessed on 16 February 2022).
  76. Nazir, Y.; Hussain, S.A.; Hamid, A.A.; Song, Y. Probiotics and their potential preventive and therapeutic role for cancer, high serum cholesterol, and allergic and hiv diseases. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 3428437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stavropoulou, E.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Probiotics in Medicine: A Long Debate. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Elgamily, H.; Safwat, E.; Soliman, Z.; Salama, H.; El-Sayed, H.; Anwar, M. Antibacterial and Remineralization Efficacy of Casein Phosphopeptide, Glycomacropeptide Nanocomplex, and Probiotics in Experimental Toothpastes: An In Vitro Comparative Study. Eur. J. Dent. 2019, 13, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Elgamily, H.; Salama, H.; El-Sayed, H.; Safwat, E.; Abd El-Salam, M. The Promising Efficacy of Probiotics, Casein Phosphopeptide and Casein Macropeptide as Dental Anticariogenic and Remineralizing Agents Part I; An In Vitro Study. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2018, 22, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sarvari, F.; Mortazavian, A.M.; Fazeli, M.R. Biochemical Characteristics and Viability of Probiotic and Yoghurt Bacteria in Yoghurt during the Fermentation and Refrigerated Storage. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2014, 1, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  81. Mohan, A.; Hadi, J.; Gutierrez-Maddox, N.; Li, Y.; Leung, I.K.; Gao, Y.; Quek, S.Y. Sensory, Microbiological and Physicochemical Characterization of Functional Manuka Honey Yoghurts Containing Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DPC16. Foods 2020, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Akl, E.M.; Abdelhamid, S.M.; Wagdy, S.M.; Salama, H.H. Manufacture of functional fat-free cream cheese fortified with probiotic bacteria and flaxseed mucilage as fat replacing agent. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 16, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. El-Messery, T.M.; El-Said, M.M.; Salama, H.H.; Mohammed, D.M.; Ros, G. Bioaccessibility of Encapsulated Mango Peel Phenolic Extract and Its Application in Milk Beverage. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 16, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. El-Said, M.M.; El-Messery, T.M.; Salama, H.H. Functional properties and in vitro bio-accessibility attributes of light ice cream incorporated with purple rice bran. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alizadeh, A.; Ehsani, M.R.; Homayouni, A. Acetaldehyde production rate in yoghurt made from ultrafiltered skim milk. Asian J. Chem. 2008, 20, 6529. [Google Scholar]
  86. Valencia, A.P.; Doyen, A.; Benoit, S.; Margni, M.; Pouliot, Y. Effect of ultrafiltration of milk prior to fermentation on mass balance and process efficiency in Greek-style yoghurt manufacture. Foods 2018, 7, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Saad, S.A.; Salama, H.H.; EL-Sayed, H.S. Manufacture of Functional Labneh from UF-Retentate with Artichoke Puree. Int. J. Dairy Sci 2015, 10, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Das, A.; Ray, S.; Raychaudhuri, U.; Chakraborty, R. Microencapsulation of Probiotic Bacteria and Its Potential Application in Food Technology. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 6, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Silva, K.C.G.; Cezarino, E.C.; Michelon, M.; Sato, A.C.K. Symbiotic microencapsulation to enhance Lactobacillus acidophilus survival. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2018, 89, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chavada, P.J. Novel application of nanotechnology in dairy and food industry: Nano inside. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 8, 2920–2922. [Google Scholar]
  91. Newbold, D.; Koppel, K. Carbonated Dairy Beverages: Challenges and Opportunities. Beverages 2018, 4, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Abesinghe, A.M.N.L.; Priyashantha, H.; Prasanna, P.H.P.; Kurukulasuriya, M.S.; Ranadheera, C.S.; Vidanarachchi, J.K. Inclusion of Probiotics into Fermented Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Milk: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation 2020, 6, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Favaro-Trindade, C.S.; de Pinho, S.C.; Rocha, G.A. Revisão: Microencapsulação de ingredientes alimentícios. Braz. J. Food Technol. 2008, 11, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  94. Mirzaei, H.; Pourjafar, H.; Homayouni, A. Effect of calcium alginate and resistant starch microencapsulation on the survival rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and sensory properties in Iranian white brined cheese. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1966–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Polat, S.; Trif, M.; Rusu, A.; Šimat, V.; Čagalj, M.; Alak, G.; Meral, R.; Özogul, Y.; Polat, A.; Özogul, F. Recent advances in industrial applications of seaweeds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 8, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kanmani, P.; Lim, S.T. Development and characterization of novel probioticresiding pullulan/starch edible films. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, H.; Livingston, K.A.; Fox, C.S.; Meigs, J.B.; Jacques, P.F. Yoghurt consumption is associated with better diet quality and metabolic profile in American men and women. Nutr. Res. 2013, 33, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Panahi, S.; Tremblay, A. The Potential Role of Yoghurt in Weight Management and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2016, 35, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, H.; Troy, L.M.; Rogers, G.T.; Fox, C.S.; McKeown, N.M.; Meigs, J.B.; Jacques, P.F. Longitudinal association between dairy consumption and changes of body weight and waist circumference: The Framingham Heart Study. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Fares, B.S.; Abd el Kader, S.; Abd El Hamid, A.A.; Gaafar, H.M. Effect of ingestion of yoghurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus on vulvovaginal candidiasis among women attending a gynecological clinic. Egypt. Nurs. J. 2017, 14, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Joseph, R.J.; Ser, H.-L.; Kuai, Y.-H.; Tan, L.T.-H.; Arasoo, V.J.T.; Letchumanan, V.; Wang, L.; Pusparajah, P.; Goh, B.-H.; Ab Mutalib, N.-S.; et al. Finding a Balance in the Vaginal Microbiome: How Do We Treat and Prevent the Occurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis? Antibiotics 2021, 10, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Linares, D.M.; Gomez, C.; Renes, E.; Fresno, J.M.; Tornadijo, M.E.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. Lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria with potential to design natural biofunctional health-promoting dairy foods. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ano, Y.; Nakayama, H. Preventive effects of dairy products on dementia and the underlying mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Mehta, V.; Bhatt, K.; Desai, N.; Naik, M. Probiotics: An Adjuvant Therapy for D-Galactose Induced Alzheimer’s disease. J. Med. Res. Innov. 2017, 1, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nimgampalle, M.; Kuna, Y. Anti-Alzheimer properties of probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 1325 in Alzheimer’s disease induced albino rats. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, KC01–KC05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mitrea, L.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Precup, G.; Bindea, M.; Rusu, B.; Trif, M.; Ferenczi, L.J.; Ștefănescu, B.E.; Vodnar, D.C. Inhibitory potential of Lactobacillus plantarum on Escherichia coli. Bull. UASVM Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 74, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Ogata, S.; Tanaka, H.; Omura, K.; Honda, C.; Hayakawa, K. Association between intake of dairy products and short-term memory with and without adjustment for genetic and family environmental factors: A twin study. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Akbari, E.; Asemi, Z.; Kakhaki, R.D.; Bahmani, F.; Kouchaki, E.; Tamtaji, O.R.; Hamidi, G.A.; Salami, M. Effect of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function and metabolic status in Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ton, A.M.M.; Campagnaro, B.P.; Alves, G.A.; Aires, R.; Côco, L.Z.; Arpini, C.M.; Guerra e Oliveira, T.; Campos-Toimil, M.; Meyrelles, S.S.; Pereira, T.M.C.; et al. Oxidative stress and dementia in Alzheimer’s patients: Effects of synbiotic supplementation. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020, 2638703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jayachandran, S. The Roots of Gender Inequality in Developing Countries. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2015, 7, 63–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Burkman, R.T. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 64, 150–151. [Google Scholar]
  112. Moghadasi, A.; Abbasi, M.; Yousefi, M.; Kargarfard, M. A comparison of prevalence of premenstrual syndrome symptoms between athlete and non-athlete female students. Physiol. Sport Phys. Act. 2009, 3, 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  113. Bertone-Johnson, E.R.; Hankinson, S.E.; Willett, W.C.; Johnson, S.R.; Manson, J.E. Adiposity and the development of premenstrual syndrome. J. Women’s Health 2010, 19, 1955–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Mohebbi Dehnavi, Z.; Torkmannejad Sabzevari, M.; Rastaghi, S.; Rad, M. A survey on the association of premenstrual syndrome with type of temperament in high school students. Iran. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Infertil. 2017, 20, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  115. Jafarirad, S.; Rasaie, N.; Darabi, F. Comparison of anthropometric indices and lifestyle factors between healthy university students and affected by premenstrual syndrome. Jundishapur Sci. Med. J. 2016, 15, 217–227. [Google Scholar]
  116. Mohebi Dehnavi, Z.; Jafarnejad, F.; Mojahedi, M.; Shakeri, M.T.; Sardar, M.A. The relationship between warm and cold temperament with symptoms of premenstrual syndrome. Iran. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Infertil. 2016, 18, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  117. Vichnin, M.; Freeman, E.W.; Lin, H.; Hillman, J.; Bui, S. Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in adolescents: Severity and impairment. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2006, 19, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bhuvaneswari, K.; Rabindran, P.; Bharadwaj, B. Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and its impact on quality of life among selected college students in Puducherry. Natl. Med. J. India 2019, 32, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  119. Raval, C.M.; Panchal, B.N.; Tiwari, D.S.; Vala, A.U.; Bhatt, R.B. Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder among college students of Bhavnagar, Gujarat. Indian J Psychiatry 2016, 58, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hammam, R.A.M.; Zalat, M.M.; Sadek, S.M.; Soliman, B.S.; Ahmad, R.A.; Mahdy, R.S.; Hardy, C. Premenstrual syndrome and work among female academic teaching staff in a governmental faculty of medicine in Egypt. Egypt. J. Occup. Med. 2017, 41, 35–53. [Google Scholar]
  121. Fernandez, M.A.; Marette, A. Potential Health Benefits of Combining Yoghurt and Fruits Based on Their Probiotic and Prebiotic Properties. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 155S–164S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Barengolts, E.; Smith, E.D.; Reutrakul, S.; Tonucci, L.; Anothaisintawee, T. The Effect of Probiotic Yoghurt on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes or Obesity: A Meta-Analysis of Nine Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2019, 11, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Fernandez, M.A.; Panahi, S.; Daniel, N.; Tremblay, A.; Marette, A. Yoghurt and Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Critical Review of Potential Mechanisms. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 812–829. [Google Scholar]
  124. Galgano, F.; Condelli, N.; Caruso, M.C.; Colangelo, M.A.; Favati, F. Probiotics and prebiotics in fruits and vegetables: Technological and sensory aspects. In Beneficial Microbes in Fermented and Functional Foods; Rai, V.R., Bai, J.A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 189–206. [Google Scholar]
  125. Eales, J.; Lenoir-Wijnkoop, I.; King, S.; Wood, H.; Kok, F.J.; Shamir, R.; Prentice, A.; Edwards, M.; Glanville, J.; Atkinson, R.L. Is consuming yoghurt associated with weight management outcomes? Results from a systematic review. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40, 731–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Prajapati, J.B. Probiotics—An Indian Perspective. Int. J. Probiotics Prebiotics 2015, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  127. Rad, M.; Sabzevary, M.T.; Dehnavi, Z.M. Factors associated with premenstrual syndrome in female high school students. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018, 7, 64. [Google Scholar]
  128. Filho, E.A.R.; Lima, J.C.; Neto, J.S.P.; Montarroyos, U. Essential fatty acids for premenstrual syndrome and their effect on prolactin and total cholesterol levels: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Reprod. Health 2011, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Sarkar, A.; Lehto, S.M.; Harty, S.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F.; Burnet, P. Psychobiotics and the Manipulation of Bacteria-Gut-Brain Signals. Trends Neurosci. 2016, 39, 763–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Aziz, T.; Sarwar, A.; Al-Dalali, S.; Din, Z.U.; Megrous, S.; Din, J.U.; Zou, X.; Zhennai, Y. Production of linoleic acid metabolites by different probiotic strains of Lactobacillus plantarum. Prog. Nutr. 2019, 21, 693–701. [Google Scholar]
  131. Mahboubi, M. Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis) Oil in Management of Female Ailments. J. Menopaus. Med. 2019, 25, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Szparaga, A.; Tabor, S.; Kocira, S.; Czerwińska, E.; Kuboń, M.; Płóciennik, B.; Findura, P. Survivability of Probiotic Bacteria in Model Systems of Non-Fermented and Fermented Coconut and Hemp Milks. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Thakkar, P.N.; Modi, H.A.; Prajapati, J. Therapeutic Impacts of Probiotics—As Magic Bullet. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 8, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Koutnikova, H.; Genser, B.; Monteiro-Sepulveda, M.; Faurie, J.M.; Rizkalla, S.; Schrezenmeir, J.; Clément, K. Impact of bacterial probiotics on obesity, diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e017995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Depommier, C.; Everard, A.; Druart, C.; Plovier, H.; Van Hul, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Raes, J.; Maiter, D.; Delzenne, N.M.; et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: A proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yen, S.; Johnson, J.S. Metagenomics: A path to understanding the gut microbiome. Mamm. Genome Off. J. Int. Mamm. Genome Soc. 2021, 32, 282–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fricker, A.M.; Podlesny, D.; Fricke, W.F. What is new and relevant for sequencing-based microbiome research? A mini-review. J. Adv. Res. 2019, 19, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Singh, A.P. Genomic Techniques Used to Investigate the Human Gut Microbiota. In Human Microbiome; Beloborodova, N.V., Grechko, A.V., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kvakova, M.; Bertkova, I.; Stofilova, J.; Savidge, T.C. Co-Encapsulated Synbiotics and Immobilized Probiotics in Human Health and Gut Microbiota Modulation. Foods 2021, 10, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Rashidinejad, A.; Bahrami, A.; Rehman, A.; Rezaei, A.; Babazadeh, A.; Singh, H.; Jafari, S.M. Co-encapsulation of probiotics with prebiotics and their application in functional/synbiotic dairy products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 62, 2470–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Huq, T.; Fraschini, C.; Khan, A.; Riedl, B.; Bouchard, J.; Lacroix, M. Alginate based nanocomposite for microencapsulation of probiotic: Effect of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) and lecithin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 168, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. El-Abd, M.M.; Abdel-Hamid, M.; El-Sayed, S.H.; El Metwaly, A.H.; El-Demerdash, M.E.; Zeinab, F.A.M. Viability of Micro-Encapsulated Probiotics Combined with Plant Extracts in Fermented Camel Milk under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions. Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 837–850. [Google Scholar]
  143. Yu, J.; Jeon, Y.-R.; Kim, Y.-H.; Jung, E.-B.; Choi, S.-J. Characterization and Determination of Nanoparticles in Commercial Processed Foods. Foods 2021, 10, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ranjha, M.M.A.N.; Shafique, B.; Rehman, A.; Mehmood, A.; Ali, A.; Zahra, S.M.; Roobab, U.; Singh, A.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Siddiqui, S.A. Biocompatible Nanomaterials in Food Science, Technology, and Nutrient Drug Delivery: Recent Developments and Applications. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 778155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Health benefits of probiotic bacteria (adapted from Linares et al. [102]).
Figure 2. Health benefits of probiotic bacteria (adapted from Linares et al. [102]).
Coatings 12 00838 g002
Table 1. Different nanotechnology applications for food and dairy industries and its benefits.
Table 1. Different nanotechnology applications for food and dairy industries and its benefits.
ProductsTechnology UsedFood and Dairy ApplicationsReferences
Nano-sized additives/ingredients Nanostructures of food ingredientsEnhancing bioavailability, improved texture, flavor, taste, salt and sugar reduction [10,11]
Delivery systems for additives/supplements Supplements nano-encapsulated e.g., micelles- and liposomes-based Taste masking[12,13]
Nano-engineered particulate additives/supplements Nanoparticle form of additives/supplements Antimicrobial and antifungal, enhancing bioavailability of nutrients, health benefits [14,15]
Food coating and packagingActive nano-composites, intelligent and smart packagingDurability, barrier properties, improve flexibility, temperature/moisture stability[16,17]
Enzymatic structure, modification, emulsions, foams, aerogels Nutrient delivery Increasing bioavailability of nutrients, targeted delivery of nutrients [18]
Effective separation of target material from food Membrane filtration Higher quality fluids and food products [19]
Engineering nanoparticles Nanotechnology-based disinfectantsNon-contaminated foods, protection against pathogens [20]
Nanolithography depositions Nanoparticle-based intelligent inks; reactive nanolayers Authentication, prevention of adulteration, traceability[21]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salama, H.H.; Trif, M.; Rusu, A.V.; Bhattacharya, S. Application of Functional and Edible Coatings and Films as Promising Strategies for Developing Dairy Functional Products—A Review on Yoghurt Case. Coatings 2022, 12, 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060838

AMA Style

Salama HH, Trif M, Rusu AV, Bhattacharya S. Application of Functional and Edible Coatings and Films as Promising Strategies for Developing Dairy Functional Products—A Review on Yoghurt Case. Coatings. 2022; 12(6):838. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salama, Heba Hassan, Monica Trif, Alexandru Vasile Rusu, and Sourish Bhattacharya. 2022. "Application of Functional and Edible Coatings and Films as Promising Strategies for Developing Dairy Functional Products—A Review on Yoghurt Case" Coatings 12, no. 6: 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop