Next Article in Journal
Polymerisation Kinetics on FT-IR and Colorimetric Changes under UV Irradiation for a Commercial Polycyanoacrylate Adhesive, Addressed to Glass Restoration
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Chitosan-Lignosulfonate Composite Coating Film in Grape Preservation and Study on the Difference in Metabolites in Fruit Wine
Previous Article in Journal
Photocatalytic Activity in the In-Flow Degradation of NO on Porous TiO2–Coated Glasses from Hybrid Inorganic–Organic Thin Films Prepared by a Combined ALD/MLD Deposition Strategy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Pleurotus ostreatus on Physicochemical Properties and Residual Nitrite of the Pork Sausage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/coatings12040489
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Use of Aloe vera Gel Alone and in Combination with Lemongrass Essential Oil as a Coating Material for Strawberry Fruits: HPLC and EDX Analyses

by
Hanaa S. Hassan
1,
Mervat EL-Hefny
2,*,
Ibrahim M. Ghoneim
1,
Mina S. R. Abd El-Lahot
3,
Mohammad Akrami
4,
Asma A. Al-Huqail
5,
Hayssam M. Ali
5 and
Doaa Y. Abd-Elkader
1
1
Department of Vegetable, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt
2
Department of Floriculture, Ornamental Horticulture and Garden Design, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt
3
Department of Food Science & Technology, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt
4
Department of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
5
Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(4), 489; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12040489
Submission received: 18 February 2022 / Revised: 25 March 2022 / Accepted: 1 April 2022 / Published: 6 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coatings on Food Packaging and Shelf Life)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Strawberry is a non-climacteric fruit but exhibits a limited postharvest life due to rapid softening and decay. A strawberry coating that is natural and safe for human consumption can be used to improve the appearance and safeguard the fruits. In this study, 20% and 40% Aloe vera gel alone or in combination with 1% lemongrass essential oil (EO) was used as an edible coating for strawberries. After application of all the treatments, the strawberry fruits were stored at a temperature of 5 ± 1 °C at a relative humidity (RH) of 90%–95% for up to 16 days and all the parameters were analyzed and compared to control (uncoated fruits). The results show that A. vera gel alone or with lemongrass EO reduced the deterioration and increased the shelf life of the fruit. Treatment with A. vera gel and lemongrass EO decreased acidity and total anthocyanins and maintained fruit firmness. Treatment with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% led to the lowest weight loss, retained firmness and acidity, but increased the total soluble solids and total anthocyanins compared to uncoated fruits during storage of up to 16 days. The phenolic compounds of A. vera gel were analyzed by HPLC, and the most abundant compounds were found to be caffeic (30.77 mg/mL), coumaric (22.4 mg/mL), syringic (15.12 mg/mL), sinapic (14.05 mg/mL), ferulic (8.22 mg/mL), and cinnamic acids (7.14 mg/mL). Lemongrass EO was analyzed by GC–MS, and the most abundant compounds were identified as α-citral (neral) (40.10%) ꞵ-citral (geranial) (30.71%), γ-dodecalactone (10.24%), isoneral (6.67%), neryl acetal (5.64%), and linalool (1.77%). When the fruits were treated with 20% or 40% A. vera gel along with 1% lemongrass, their total phenolic content was maintained during the storage period (from 4 to 8 days). The antioxidant activity was relatively stable during the 8 days of cold storage of the fruits coated with A. vera gel combined with lemongrass EO because the activity of both 20% and 40% gel was greater than that for the other treatments after 12 days of storage in both experiments. Moreover, all the treatments resulted in lower numbers of total microbes at the end of the storage period compared with the control treatment. This study indicates that the use of Aloe vera gel with lemongrass EO as an edible coating considerably enhances the productivity of strawberry fruits and the treatment could be used on a commercial scale.

1. Introduction

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is an economically important crop worldwide [1,2]. It has a great nutritional value because it contains minerals, vitamins, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds with beneficial biological properties, for instance antioxidant, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory activities [3,4]. Strawberry has tremendous prospects for commercial use, e.g., for the extraction of natural color with great potential for diverse value-added processed products [5]. However, the physiological characteristics of strawberry fruits deteriorate easily, as their softening reduces their postharvest shelf life during cold storage [6,7].
Postharvest losses in produce are a constant struggle for modern agriculture, which makes it urgent to develop new alternatives to reduce the waste [8,9]. To prolong the storage life of fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables, several physical, chemical, and biological alternatives and treatments have been proposed [10]. Recently, methods of ozone, electrolyzed water, modified/controlled atmospheric packaging, natural compounds, antifungal edible coatings, and biocontrol agents have emerged as safe alternatives and efficient preservation methods in the fresh produce industry [11,12,13].
Edible coatings are made up of natural polymers, such as carbohydrates, proteins, waxes, and their composites, that separate fruits from the surrounding atmosphere [14,15]. Coatings with edible films and essential oils (EOs) can also help to maintain the postharvest quality of fruits by reducing transpiration and respiration [16,17]. They also protect fruits and vegetables from deterioration by reducing the microbial growth and enhancing the textural quality [18,19,20].
Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) is a succulent plant belonging to the family Asphodelaceae [21]. A. vera leaves have been used for many centuries for their therapeutic properties, and over 75 active ingredients have been identified in its gel [22].
A. vera gel is rich in soluble sugars and polysaccharides but has low properties of hydrophobic and lipid levels with gas barrier efficacy, making it an ideal edible coating material [23,24]. Moreover, A. vera gel coatings act as a barrier to moisture and O2, reducing the respiration rate, thereby preventing anaerobic conditions and conserving fruit quality [25].
As a coating material, A. vera gel maintains the texture, color, and shelf life of fruits and vegetables [26,27]. It is edible, invisible, odorless, and does not affect the quality of the fruit and vegetables, moreover, it is safe for human health and ecofriendly [28]. Furthermore, it reduces respiration rate, moisture loss, softening of tissues, oxidative browning, and proliferation of microorganisms in fruits, such as strawberry, cherry laurel fruit, and grapes [27,29,30]. Using A. vera gel dip coating reduced weight loss, changes in the physicochemical parameters, and decay, extending the shelf life of figs and litchi fruits [30,31].
EOs play an important role in the protection of the plants as they are antimicrobials and insecticides [32]. One of the advantages of plant EOs is their bioactivity in the vapor phase, which makes them possible fumigants to control postharvest rotting fungi in fruits and grains [33]. For example, lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus), one of the important medicinal herbs, belonging to family Poaceae, is known to have strong antimicrobial and insecticidal properties [34,35,36,37,38]. It shows a strong fungicidal effect against microorganisms in fruit juices [39]. Lemongrass EOs are composed of terpenes and phenylpropenes compounds [40]. In addition, they contain other chemical groups like ketones, alcohols, esters, aldehyde, and flavonoid compounds [41]. The major components of Lemongrass EOs are nerol, α-citral, citronellal, β-citral, geraniol, terpinolene, myrcene, geranyl acetate, terpinol, and methylheptenone [34,35,36,37,42,43]. Mixtures of A. vera gel and EOs are widely studied as edible coatings for fresh-cut and whole fruit [14].
The present research assessed the effect of A. vera gel and lemongrass EO to enhance the postharvest quality, bioactive constituents, and shelf life of strawberry fruit.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

In two successive experiments during 2020, fruits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Winterstar, a short-day genotype adapted to an annual plastic culture growing system, were harvested at commercial maturity (red color on 80% of the fruit surface) at 30°35′34.5″ N, 30°42′58.4″ E, Behira Governorate, Egypt. The plant is compact, upright, and with long pedicels, making the fruit easy to harvest. This variety produces conical and firm fruit that is uniform in shape throughout the season and has low sourness. The mature fruit has red color on about 90% of its surface [44]. Those fruits were chosen that had red color on over 80% of their surface and were free from mechanical damage, blemishes, and disease [27]. On the same day of harvesting, the fruits were delivered to the laboratory of Alex Postharvest Center (APHC), Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University. Then, they were washed with fresh water, air dried, and used in the post-harvest treatments.

2.2. A. vera Gel Extraction and HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

A. vera mature leaves were obtained from the Nursery of Floriculture, Ornamental Horticulture and Garden Design Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University (Alexandria, Egypt). The leaves were washed in tap water and then the gel was separated and blended to obtain a homogeneous mixture. The mixture was filtered using a muslin cloth and then centrifuged at 10000× g for 25 min to remove the fibers [45]. Then, concentrations were prepared for HPLC analysis as follows: 0.5 g of powdered A. vera gel was extracted by ultrasound for 30 min at 25 °C using methanol/water (80%, v/v) and filtered.
Phenolic compounds were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography equipment (Agilent 1100, pump PU-1580; UV detector UV-1570; injector equipped with a 20 μL loop) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The samples were separated using a 250 mm × 4.6 mm stainless-steel column Discovery-C18 4 μm (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The flow rate of the mobile phase was kept at 1 mL/min. Solvent A was water containing 0.05% formic acid, and solvent B was acetonitrile/methanol (80%:20%, v/v). The gradient conditions were as follows: 0–5 min, 10% B; 5–15 min, 10%–18% B; 15–25 min, 18% B; 25–30 min, 18%–25% B; 30–35 min, 25% B; 35–40 min, 25%–35% B; 40–45 min, 35%–60% B; 45–50 min, 60%–10% B; and 50–55 min, 10% B. The temperature of the column was controlled at 25 °C.

2.3. Extraction and Chemical Analysis of Lemongrass EO

Lemongrass leaves were obtained from the Nursery of Floriculture, Ornamental Horticulture and Garden Design Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University. About 100 g of fresh leaves were chopped and put in a 2 L flask and the essential oil (EO) was hydrodistillated using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 3 h. The collected EO was kept in brown bottles at 4 °C until use [46].
The EO chemical composition was determined using a Trace GC Ultra-ISQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) with a direct capillary column TG–5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness). To prepare the EO for GC–MS, 5 µL from the pure lemongrass EO was dissolved in 1.5 mL of hexane. Then, 1 µL was injected into GC–MS. The temperatures of column oven, chemical separation and identification conditions can be found in a previous study [47]. The match factor (MF) between the mass spectrum obtained for each compound and the library mass spectra for each compound was measured and reported, where it was accepted if its value ≥650 [35].

2.4. Preparation of A. vera–Lemongrass EO Coating

A. vera gel solution (20%–40%) + lemongrass EO 1% was mixed by dissolving lemongrass EO in distilled water with a few drops of Tween-80 (0.01% w/v) for 2 min, then the gel was added under vigorous shaking for approximately 2 min [12].

2.5. Treatment Application and Analysis

The fruits were separated into five groups (150 fruits per group and 3 replicates/treatment). Each group was treated by immersing fruits with the treatments mentioned in Table 1, for 1 min. Then, the fruits were left to air-dry at room temperature for 1 h so that their surfaces were dry [27,48]. The treated fruits were drained, packed in perforated polystyrene bags (1 L), and stored at 5 ± 1 °C under 90%–95% relative humidity for 16 days. The parameters were recorded every 4 days for each treatment.

2.6. Physical Parameters of Strawberry

2.6.1. Weight Loss (%)

The fresh weight of fruit of each replicate was measured on the treatment day and at 4, 8, 12, and 16 days of sampling time. The cumulative weight loss was expressed as a percentage loss of the original fresh weight: weight loss (%) = (F0 − F1)/F0 × 100, where F0 is the initial fresh weight and F1 is the measured weight on each sampling day.

2.6.2. Fruit Firmness

The strawberry fruit firmness was determined using a texture analyzer for each treatment and storage period using FT011 Fruit Firmness Tester (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). This instrument consists of penetrating cylinder (1 mm in diameter) to penetrate inside the pulp of fruits up to a constant distance of 5 mm at a speed 2 mm/s. The firmness per Newton (N) was measured.

2.7. Color Fruit Samples

HunterLab Colormeter (HunterLab Labscan 600 spectrocolorimeter, version 3.0; Hunter Associates Laboratory Inc., Reston, VA, USA) was used according to the Granato and Masson [49]. Strawberry fruits from each treatment were measured at three equidistant points for L* (lightness), a* (redness), b* (yellowness), while hue angle (h°) was measured [(h° = tan−1(b*/a*)] for each sample.

2.8. Physicochemical and Bioactive Constituents of Strawberry

2.8.1. Soluble Solid Content (SSC)

Firstly, in a mortar, the fruit samples were crushed then squeezed to acquire juice by hand. A digital refractometer (model PR101, Co. Ltd., Atago, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the soluble solid content (SSC) in the fruit juice.

2.8.2. Titratable Acidity (TA), pH and Total Anthocyanin Measurements

Fruits titratable acidity (TA) was analyzed using the Association of Official Analytical Chemists’ (AOAC) standard [50]. pH was measure by a digital pH meter (Martini, Temperature Laboratory Bench meter Mi 150 pH, Da Nang City, Vietnam) according to the AOAC standard [50]. All parameters of fruit samples were determined after 4, 8, 12, and 16 days. Total anthocyanins were extracted and then calculated (mg of cyanidin chloride g−1) [51].

2.8.3. Total Phenolic Content

Phenolic compounds were extracted with methanol (containing 0.1% HCl) as a solvent. One gram of the sample was individually blended with the solvent at a ratio of 1:20 (w/v) and the extraction was carried out twice at the room temperature. Then the extract was stored at −18 °C until use. The total phenolic content was measured at 750 nm by Optizin UV–Vis spectrophotometer model (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) [50] followed by Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and gallic acid (GA) as the standard. The results were expressed as mg of GA equivalent (GAE)/100 g of FW.

2.8.4. Antioxidant Activity

Strawberry fruit samples (10 g) were soaked in 80% ethanol (50 mL) for 1 week at room temperature, filtered through Whatman paper No. 1, and stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator until use [52]. The antioxidant activity was assessed by evaluating the free-radical-scavenging activity of the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical according to a modified method as described previously [53] using Optizin UV–Vis spectrophotometer model (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). The radical-scavenging activity was calculated as a percentage of DPPH discoloration using the following equation: scavenging activity (%) = ((AControl – ASample)/AControl) × 100, where ASample is the absorbance of the tested sample and AControl is the absorbance of the control (DPPH solution).

2.8.5. Fruit Extraction and HPLC Analysis of Flavonoid Compounds

From each treatment, about 50 gm of strawberry fruits were soaked in 60 mL of ethanol for 1 week to acquire the extract. The extracts were filtered using filter paper (Whatman No. 1), concentrated, and in brown vials were stored for further analysis. The flavonoid compounds from the extracts were identified by HPLC (Agilent 1100, Santa Clara, CA, USA), composed of two LC pumps, a UV/Vis detector, and a C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) [54].

2.9. Elemental Analysis of Strawberry Fruit EDX Analysis

Elemental analysis of strawberry fruits was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), attached with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDX), and a JFC-1100E ion sputtering device (model JEOL/MP, JSMIT200 Series, Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 20.00 kV (SEM–EDX) [55] to measure the changes in the elemental chemical composition of strawberry fruits due to different treatments.

2.10. Microbiological Analysis

Samples of a specific weight were pacified to decimal serial dilutions in Ringer’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy), and 25 g of the fruit samples were homogenized in a flask containing 225 mL of Ringer’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) using the Bag-Mixer 400 stomacher (Interscience, Saint Nom, France) for 2 min at the highest speed (blending power 4). All test tubes of serial dilutions used contained Ringer’s solution (9 mL). Peptone Dextrose agar (PDA) was used for all plate media. A total of 1 mL of the bacterial suspension was pipetted into a dilution tube containing 9 mL of Ringer’s solution. This tube was vortexed, and 1 mL of this volume was removed and placed into a second dilution tube containing 9 mL of Ringer’s solution. This process was repeated until the sample was sufficiently diluted. These PDA plates are prepared in three replicates, and 100 mL of this suspension was added to the plates and repeated for every tube in the dilution series. The different microbial groups were investigated as follows: total mesophilic microorganisms (TMM) on plate count agar (PCA) incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and total yeasts and molds (TYM) on PDA supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.1 g/L) to avoid the growth of bacteria then incubated for 48 h at 25 °C. Plate counts were achieved by the spread plate method [56] by inoculating 100 µL from each sample’s suspension of appropriate dilution. All media were supplied from Oxoid (Milan, Italy). At each collection time, the microbiological counts were performed in triplicate.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to statistical analysis for calculation of means, variance and standard error using CoStat Software Program Version 6.303 (CoHort Software, Monterey, CA, USA) using one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA, general linear model), followed by Duncan multiple range test for p < 0.05 [57] was used to test the differences among treatments.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phenolic Profile of A. vera Gel by HPLC

The data in Table 2 and Figure 1 show the six identified phenolic compounds of A. vera gel by HPLC. Caffeic acid is the most abundant, followed by coumaric, syringic, sinapic, ferulic, and cinnamic acids, and their percentages are displayed in Table 2. These data were matched with the studies by López et al. [58], who found that A. vera gel contains catechin, sinapic acid, and quercitrin; Elbandy et al. [59], who observed that gallic protocatecuic, vanillic, ferulic acids, cinnamic, p-coumaric acids, hesperidin, rosmarinicrutin, quercitrin, narengenin, hesperitin, kampferol, and apigenin are the main components of A. vera gel; and Numan [60], who confirmed that the gel contains the phenolic compounds quercetin, catechin, aloe emodin, sinapic acid, and aloin [58,60].

3.2. Chemical Constituents of Lemongrass Oil

Table 3 shows the chemical constituents of the EO from lemongrass fresh leaves, where the main components were α-citral (neral) (40.10%), β-citral (geranial) (30.71%), γ-dodecalactone (10.24%), isoneral (6.67%), neryl acetal (5.64%), linalool (1.77%), citral (1.22%), isocitral (0.97%), and geraniol acetate (0.91%). Previous studies have reported that the major constituents of EO are α-citral, β-citral, geraniol, nerol, terpinolene, geranyl acetate, citronellal, myrcene, and terpinol methylheptenone [37]. In one study, α-citral (44.97%), α-citral (33.06%), and myrcene (7.68%) were identified as the major compounds of lemongrass EO [61].
In general, lemongrass EO contains greater than 45% of α- or β-citral but the amount can vary widely depending on the factors the plants are exposed to, such as genetic diversity, weather, and extraction techniques [62,63,64].

3.3. Physical Parameters of Strawberry fruits

3.3.1. Weight Loss (%)

The effects of different treatments on the weight loss (%) of strawberry fruits during the 16 days of storage period in both experiments are shown in Figure 2. During the time in all treatments, the weight loss (%) was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased, but all the edible coating treatments helped to reduce the weight loss of strawberry fruit in the two experiments. At the end of storage (day 16), the highest weight loss (6.11%) was observed for the control sample, while the lowest value (11.87%) was obtained for fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% coating, followed by fruits treated with A. vera gel 20% + EO 1% coating (7.63%), in the two experiments.
The reduction in the weight loss in the fruits treated with A. vera with EO could be due to composition of polysaccharides in A. vera gel, which act as an effective moisture barrier [23,24]. The water loss reduction mechanism is based on the hygroscopic water pressure between the fruit and environment, whereas A. vera gel can form a film on the strawberry surface with a thin layer, sealing small wounds and reducing moisture loss [27,65,66].

3.3.2. Fruit Firmness

The firmness of strawberry fruits significantly reduced after all treatments during storage of 4, 8, 12, and 16 days in the two experiments, as shown in Figure 3. The coating treatments showed a higher firmness value than the control strawberry fruits. The firmness of strawberries treated with A. vera gel at 20% and 40% was found to be lower than that of other coated samples with A. vera gel combined with EO during different days of storage, showing that the treated and control strawberry fruit become less firm due to reaping (Figure 3). Compared to that of the control, the highest firmness value was that of strawberry fruits treated with A. vera gel 40%, followed by the fruits treated with A. vera gel 20% and those treated with A. vera gel with EO 1%. A. vera gel coatings retarded the postharvest ripening process and reduced the firmness of table grape and sour cherry [67,68]. Lower water vapor from fruits subjected to A. vera gel coating results in maintained turgor pressure of the cell wall [69,70]. The treated fruits with A. vera with EO showed slightly higher firmness, that could be due to the higher hydrophobic properties in this treatment. In agreement with this work, the coated strawberry fruits with A. vera gel alone and combined with basil EO had a lower softening rate compared to the control treatment [71].

3.4. Color Value

The data in Table 4 and Table 5 show that the color value of strawberry fruits was influenced by the different coating treatments. The L* of the strawberry fruits increased in lightness in both coating treatments during the shelf-life study. In other words, a coating of A. vera gel or A. vera gel with lemongrass EO helped to maintain the lightness of the fruit compared to the control samples (Table 4 and Table 5). The chromaticity coordinate a* value, representing the red-green color, was slightly affected by the coatings and remained stable in all treatments during the shelf life. The chromaticity coordinate b* value of strawberry fruits slightly reduced over storage time and coating treatment by A. vera gel only. However, A. vera gel with lemongrass EO increased this parameter by day 16 in the two experiments. Coated and control fruits showed a significant decrease in hue during the first 8 days of storage and the hue increased as the storage period was increased to 16 days (Table 4 and Table 5).
The color of strawberry fruits is an important property for product reception by the consumer; although the coating did not change the fruit initially color [72], and with the increased storage time, the fruit became redder and darker. This increase was probably due to a reduction in both the respiration rate and some enzymatic processes, maintaining the quality of the fruit and preventing its browning [73]. At the end of storage time, control fruits and those treated with gluten plus CaCl2 had a low L* value (darker color) [74].

3.5. Physicochemical and Bioactive Constituents of Strawberry

3.5.1. Soluble Solid Content (SSC)

The effect of A. vera gel and lemongrass EO coating on the SSC content of strawberry fruits during the storage period of 16 days is shown in Figure 4. The SSC content in treated strawberry fruits increased gradually until day 16 of the storage period in the two experiments (Figure 4). Until the end of the trial in the treatments with control and A. vera gel 20%, a gradual increase in the SSC was found, which indicates that A. vera gel 20% and 40% + lemongrass EO 1% treatments had slowed the respiration rate of strawberry fruits during the storage period. The same result was reported previously, indicating a link between SSC and respiration rate [27]. In both experiments, the maximum increase in the SSC content was found in the control on day 16. In the case of treatment with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1%, the least SSC content was observed on days 4 and 8 in the second experiment (Figure 4b). The hydrolysis of starch into sugar might cause the initial increase in the SSC and subsequently the decline in SSC could be due to the decreased respiration rate and the metabolism of sugars into organic acids [48]. A lower SSC could be related to the hydrolysis of carbohydrates into sugar [65].

3.5.2. Titratable Acidity (TA) and pH

The changes in the Titratable acidity (TA) amount and pH of fruit strawberry in the two experiments during storage are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. The pH of strawberry juices increased in all treatments during the storage period until day 8 in both experiments (Figure 6). Moreover, the coated fruits in both experiments had steadied pH around 3.5. However, coating treatments slowed down the titratable acidity (TA) change in the strawberries during the shelf-life study compared with uncoated fruits (control).
The TA amount in strawberry is directly correlated to fruit organic acids content [48]. The content of fruit acid tends to decrease over time, that could due to the organic acids oxidation as the fruit ripens [75]. The edible coatings of the fruits reduce the respiration rate, decreasing the consumption of organic acids in the respiratory metabolic activities of the fruits [48,76].

3.5.3. Total Anthocyanins

The change in the total anthocyanins of strawberry fruits coated with A. vera gel and A. vera gel with lemongrass EO is shown in Figure 7. The total anthocyanin content in all the treatments increased for the first 12 days of storage in both experiments. Thereafter, it decreased gradually for the remainder of storage. The untreated fruit showed the maximum anthocyanin concentration (277 mg·kg−1) on day 12 of the storage, followed by fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% (246 mg·kg−1) and those treated with A. vera gel 20% + lemongrass EO 1% (221 mg·kg−1) at the end of the storage period, compared to 163 mg·kg−1 when the fruits were initially stored.
The significant increase in anthocyanin in control treatment could probably be related to the natural process during fruit ripening. However, the fruits treated with EOs showed a lower concentration of anthocyanin than the untreated ones. During cold storage the anthocyanin of treated fruits was increased, similar to those reported previously [77], which may be due to the continued biosynthesis of these compounds after harvest. Furthermore, total anthocyanin showed significant differences among fruits coated with a lemongrass EO and alginate-based edible coating [78].

3.5.4. Total Phenolic Content

It is clear from Figure 8 that all examined postharvest treatments decreased the total phenolic content (TPC) in both experiments. However, the highest TPC was recorded by untreated fruits, followed by fruits treated with A. vera gel 20%. The lowest values of TPC were scored by the treated fruits with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% and those treated with A. vera gel 20% + lemongrass EO 1% during both experiments. Figure 8 also indicates that regardless of the initial reading, the TPC was increased from day 4 to day 8 of storage.
Anthocyanins are a group of phenolic compounds responsible for the red-blue color of many fruits and are important for human health [79]. The TPC and anthocyanin may be one of their most significant biological properties [80]. In the current study, the TPC decreased while anthocyanin increased in the untreated fruit. It is important for fruits to retain high levels of these compounds during storage and over their shelf life. The anthocyanin and TPC of the treated fruit increased during cold storage (Figure 8), similar to those reported previously [77], which may be due to the continued biosynthesis of these compounds after harvest. The evolution of the TPC of fruits during storage could be different depending on the species, temperature, cultivar, and climactic and environmental conditions during the growth period [48]. The findings indicate that both TPC and anthocyanin content in fruits treated with A. vera + ascorbic acid were higher than those in either untreated fruits or fruits treated with A. vera alone. Similarly, the use of ascorbic acid as a reducing agent prevented a decrease in the TPC in fresh-cut fruits [14,66].

3.5.5. Antioxidant Activity

The free-radical-scavenging activity (% inhibition) of strawberry fruits’ ethanolic extracts was assessed by the DPPH test (Figure 9). Treatments with A. vera gel at 20% and 40% were more effective than treatment with A. vera gel with lemongrass EO, since the radical-scavenging activity was 77.04%, 74.58% and 58.22%, 54.29% for A. vera gel at 20% and 40% and A. vera gel with lemongrass EO, respectively, while it decreased in untreated extract to 64.24% at the end of the storage period. However, antioxidant activity was relatively stable during the 8 days of cold storage in fruits treated with A. vera gel and lemongrass EO, and the activity in fruits treated with A. vera gel at 20% or 40% was greater than the activity in fruits that underwent other treatments after 12 days of storage in both experiments. Moreover, the antioxidant activity decreased in untreated fruits and fruits treated with A. vera gel alone or combined with lemongrass EO. This means that A. vera gel at 20% and 40% has powerful potential antioxidant activity and increased the quality and stability of strawberry fruits.
Several studies have shown that strawberry is a good source of natural antioxidants [27]. It has been reported that fruits treated with A. vera had higher antioxidant capacity than the sample in the case of mango [81], raspberry [77], and table grapes (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Yaghouti) [82]. A. vera may also increase tissue resistance to decay by enhancing their antioxidant system and free-radical-scavenging capability [83]. Hidayati et al. [84] stated that antioxidant activity can be affected by the phenolic compounds and pigment content. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids as primary antioxidants can play an important role in absorbing and neutralizing free radicals, preventing the progress of diseases such as cancer [85].

3.5.6. Fruit Extraction and HPLC Analysis of the Fruit’s Flavonoids

As presented in Table 6, the flavonoid concentration (μg/mL) of strawberry fruit was affected on treatment with A. vera gel and lemongrass EO. The highest value of rutin was obtained on treatment with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% compared with the initial value in the fruits and the value in the control fruit sample (16.25, 6.14, and 9.14 μg/mL, respectively). Naringin and hesperidin values were the best in the control, with concentrations of 8.16 and 14.56 μg/mL, respectively. Isorhamnetin and genistein were not detected in any treatment except for fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1%, with concentrations of 10.23 and 3.52 μg/mL, respectively. The highest concentration of quercetin was identified in strawberry fruits treated with A. vera gel 20% (15.36 μg/mL), the highest value of kaempferol was obtained on treatment with A. vera gel 40% (20.47 μg/mL), the highest values for luteolin and catechin were observed in fruits treated with A. vera gel 20% (14.66 and 20.56 μg/mL, respectively), and the highest value of 7-hydroxyflavone was obtained in fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% (14.16 μg/mL). The best value of chrysoeriol was observed in the initial sample, followed by fruits treated with A. vera gel 40%, with concentrations of 25.08 and 17.44 μg/mL. The compound myricetin was not detected in any treatment except in fruits treated with A. vera 40%, with a concentration of 2.25 μg/mL. These results are in good agreement with the studies of Hannum [86] and Co and Markakis [87].

3.6. EDX Analysis for Elemental Composition of Strawberry Fruits

Table 7 and Figure 10 present the EDX analysis to measure the changes in the element composition of strawberry fruits due to different treatments. There was a significant effect of various treatments on element O percentage (p < 0.05), the highest value obtained on treatment with A. vera gel 20% (56.1%), followed by control (55.61%). There was a significant effect of treatments on element Ca percentage (p < 0.0001), with the highest value observed in strawberry fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% (1.23%), followed by fruits treated with A. vera gel 20% + lemongrass EO 1% (0.48%). The rest of the treatments were not significant. However, the highest values of elements C, P, and K in strawberry fruits were obtained on treatment with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1%, with percentages of 45.06%, 0.17%, and 1.8%, respectively, compared with the other treatments. The highest value of Mg in strawberry fruits was obtained on treatment with A. vera gel 40% (0.19%), whereas N was identified only in strawberry fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% alone.

3.7. Microbiological Analysis

Strawberry shows high metabolic activities and sensitivity against pathogens. The bioactive compounds and phytochemicals of the fruit rapidly decrease during storage [88]. Increased soluble sugars and sweetness and decreased acidity and defense metabolites, such as phenolic and antioxidants, make the fruit more susceptible to pathogen attack and postharvest losses [77].
The initial populations of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria and yeasts + molds in the fruit were 80 and 6 CFU g−1, respectively, which increased in the untreated and treated fruit during 16 days of cold storage (Figure 11 and Figure 12), but the samples treated with A. vera gel alone or with lemongrass EO showed a strong effect on the total count of microbes in terms of preservation during the storage period, and the counts remained lower than in untreated fruits. These results are comparable with the results of coating with A. vera gel and cinnamon EO in modified atmosphere packaging of strawberry. A reduction in microbial populations during storage was observed but there was no change observed in the mold and yeast counts until day 10 of storage; however, on day 15, a decrease in the microbial load was noticed [89].
At the end storage, the fruits treated with A. vera gel 40% and lemongrass EO recorded a lower microbial count than the fruits that underwent all other treatments. The control sample had the highest microbial count at the end of storage. Therefore, fruits treated with A. vera gel at 20% and 40% with lemongrass EO were able to resist fungal growth better than fruits treated with A. vera gel alone, and A. vera also remarkably reduced aerobic bacteria and yeast and mold counts during the 16 days of storage. In our study, a combination of A. vera gel and lemongrass EO seemed to have a synergistic effect on controlling microbial growth in strawberry during storage in a concentration-dependent manner. In a similar study, the effect of coating using A. vera gel 20% with 3% starch + 0.1% mandarin EO on physical and mechanical properties of blackberry indicated that this coating is suitable due to its thickness and shows the best mechanical properties observed, providing the fruit with greater thickness and improving its resistance to possible damage [90]. A bioactive coating combined with cinnamon EO significantly reduced mesophilic bacteria and yeast and molds in apple slices during a storage time of 25 days [91].
Coatings of A. vera gel with lemongrass EO effectively controlled or inhibited microbial populations (Figure 11 and Figure 12). The present results are comparable with the results when sweet cherries and table grapes were coated with A. vera gel, which showed a reduction in the populations of mesophilic aerobic bacteria and yeast and mold during storage. A. vera gel compounds such as saponins, acemannan, and anthraquinones derivatives are reported to be responsible for antibacterial activity [92].
Rasouli et al. [93] reported that the inhibition effect of A. vera gel on microbial load arises from the presence of ingredients such as aleonin and aloeemodin, which is a possible rationale for the diminishing of germination and mycelial growth of fungi. Antara et al. [94] stated that the compounds responsible for the antimicrobial mechanism of lemongrass EO are a group of terpenoids, e.g., geranial (β-citral) and neral (α-citral).
Certain phenolic compounds are reported to be associated with antioxidant activity, such as radical-scavenging activity [95]. As shown in Figure 8, extracts contain polyphenols and flavonoids, which exhibit not only antioxidant activity but also antimicrobial activity (e.g., ferulic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, syringic acid, sinapic acid, and cinnamic acid). Therefore, the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of extracts are linked to the activity of individual phenolic and flavonoid compounds. Extracts of A. vera gel 40% with lemongrass EO presented higher antimicrobial activity due to their high contents of total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and terpenoids. These results thus suggest that A. vera gel with lemongrass EO can be used as a natural antimicrobial.
Strawberries coated with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% had increased storage time because this treatment contributed to a decrease in the decay rate. Therefore, A. vera gel with lemongrass EO helps maintain the quality of strawberries during storage.

4. Conclusions

The results obtained from this study show that an Aloe vera gel coating with lemongrass EO on strawberry fruit has a positive influence on the quality and biochemical properties of the fruit and reduces the microbial growth on the fruit. It was observed that between the two best treatments, treatment with A. vera gel 40% followed by A. vera gel 20% + lemongrass EO 1% gives better results as compared to treatment with A. vera gel (20% or 40%); additionally, for both treatments, significantly higher results were observed as compared to control. Treatment with A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1% enhanced the shelf life of the fruit at 5 °C by maintaining its quality and reducing the spoilage by postharvest pathogens. Thus, this treatment has the potential to be practiced on other different types of strawberry fruits. The present results may show an economical and natural way to improve fruit quality as well as resistance to a wide range of microorganisms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S.H., M.E.-H. and D.Y.A.-E.; methodology, H.S.H., M.E.-H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., A.A.A.-H. and D.Y.A.-E.; software, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., I.M.G., M.E.-H., A.A.A.-H., M.A. and D.Y.A.-E.; validation, H.S.H., M.E.-H., I.M.G., M.S.R.A.E.-L. and D.Y.A.-E.; formal analysis, H.S.H., M.E.-H. and D.Y.A.-E.; investigation, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., I.M.G., M.E.-H., A.A.A.-H., M.A. and D.Y.A.-E.; resources, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., I.M.G., M.E.-H., A.A.A.-H., M.A. and D.Y.A.-E.; data curation, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., M.E.-H. and D.Y.A.-E.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., I.M.G., M.E.-H., H.M.A., M.A. and D.Y.A.-E.; writing—review and editing, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., I.M.G., M.E.-H., A.A.A.-H., M.A. and D.Y.A.-E.; visualization, H.S.H., M.S.R.A.E.-L., I.M.G., M.E.-H., A.A.A.-H., M.A. and D.Y.A.-E.; supervision, H.S.H. and D.Y.A.-E.; project administration, D.Y.A.-E.; funding acquisition, A.A.A.-H. and H.M.A. Article revision, figure amendment, and proofreading of the revised article, H.S.H., M.E.-H., D.Y.A.-E. and H.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/186) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/186), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Authors also acknowledge Alexandria University, Egypt for facilitating performing this research work as well.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahn, M.G.; Kim, D.S.; Ahn, S.R.; Sim, H.S.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.K. Characteristics and Trends of Strawberry Cultivars throughout the Cultivation Season in a Greenhouse. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ilari, A.; Toscano, G.; Boakye-Yiadom, K.A.; Duca, D.; Foppa Pedretti, E. Life Cycle Assessment of Protected Strawberry Productions in Central Italy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mozafari, A.a.; Dedejani, S.; Ghaderi, N. Positive responses of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) explants to salicylic and iron nanoparticle application under salinity conditions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018, 134, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Abu Salha, B.; Gedanken, A. Extending the Shelf Life of Strawberries by the Sonochemical Coating of their Surface with Nanoparticles of an Edible Anti-Bacterial Compound. Appl. Nano 2021, 2, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, R.; Bakshi, P.; Singh, M.; Singh, A.; Vikas, V.; Srivatava, J.; Kumar, V.; Gupta, V. Organic production of strawberry: A review. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018, 6, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eum, H.-L.; Han, S.-H.; Lee, E.-J. High-CO2 Treatment Prolongs the Postharvest Shelf Life of Strawberry Fruits by Reducing Decay and Cell Wall Degradation. Foods 2021, 10, 1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chiabrando, V.; Garavaglia, L.; Giacalone, G. The Postharvest Quality of Fresh Sweet Cherries and Strawberries with an Active Packaging System. Foods 2019, 8, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. De Corato, U. Improving the shelf-life and quality of fresh and minimally-processed fruits and vegetables for a modern food industry: A comprehensive critical review from the traditional technologies into the most promising advancements. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 940–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ziv, C.; Fallik, E. Postharvest Storage Techniques and Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables for Reducing Food Loss. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Agriopoulou, S.; Stamatelopoulou, E.; Sachadyn-Król, M.; Varzakas, T. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Antibacterial Agents to Extend the Shelf Life of Fresh and Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables: Quality and Safety Aspects. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E.; Sivakumar, D. Chitosan, a Biopolymer With Triple Action on Postharvest Decay of Fruit and Vegetables: Eliciting, Antimicrobial and Film-Forming Properties. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tzortzakis, N.; Xylia, P.; Chrysargyris, A. Sage Essential Oil Improves the Effectiveness of Aloe vera Gel on Postharvest Quality of Tomato Fruit. Agronomy 2019, 9, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Abd-Elkader, D.Y.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Komeil, D.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Salah, A.H.; Akrami, M.; Hassan, H.S. Post-Harvest Enhancing and Botrytis cinerea Control of Strawberry Fruits Using Low Cost and Eco-Friendly Natural Oils. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farina, V.; Passafiume, R.; Tinebra, I.; Palazzolo, E.; Sortino, G. Use of Aloe vera Gel-Based Edible Coating with Natural Anti-Browning and Anti-Oxidant Additives to Improve Post-Harvest Quality of Fresh-Cut ‘Fuji’ Apple. Agronomy 2020, 10, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ghoora, M.D.; Srividya, N. Effect of Packaging and Coating Technique on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life of Raphanus sativus L. and Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Microgreens. Foods 2020, 9, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hosseini, S.F.; Amraie, M.; Salehi, M.; Mohseni, M.; Aloui, H. Effect of chitosan-based coatings enriched with savory and/or tarragon essential oils on postharvest maintenance of kumquat (Fortunella sp.) fruit. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Yuan, G.; Chen, X.; Li, D. Chitosan films and coatings containing essential oils: The antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, and application in food systems. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Khodaei, D.; Hamidi-Esfahani, Z.; Rahmati, E. Effect of edible coatings on the shelf-life of fresh strawberries: A comparative study using TOPSIS-Shannon entropy method. NFS J. 2021, 23, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kahramanoğlu, İ. Effects of lemongrass oil application and modified atmosphere packaging on the postharvest life and quality of strawberry fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nair, M.S.; Tomar, M.; Punia, S.; Kukula-Koch, W.; Kumar, M. Enhancing the functionality of chitosan- and alginate-based active edible coatings/films for the preservation of fruits and vegetables: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Singh, A.; Verma, K.; Kumar, D.; Nilofer; Lothe, N.B.; Kumar, A.; Chaudhary, A.; Kaur, P.; Singh, K.P.; Singh, A.K.; et al. Optimized irrigation regime and planting technique improve yields and economics in aloe vera [Aloe barbadensis (Miller)]. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 167, 113539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Habeeb, F.; Shakir, E.; Bradbury, F.; Cameron, P.; Taravati, M.R.; Drummond, A.J.; Gray, A.I.; Ferro, V.A. Screening methods used to determine the anti-microbial properties of Aloe vera inner gel. Methods 2007, 42, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zapata, P.J.; Navarro, D.; Guillén, F.; Castillo, S.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Valero, D.; Serrano, M. Characterisation of gels from different Aloe spp. as antifungal treatment: Potential crops for industrial applications. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 42, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Morillon, V.; Debeaufort, F.; Blond, G.; Capelle, M.; Voilley, A. Factors Affecting the Moisture Permeability of Lipid-Based Edible Films: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2002, 42, 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maan, A.A.; Nazir, A.; Khan, M.K.I.; Ahmad, T.; Zia, R.; Murid, M.; Abrar, M. The therapeutic properties and applications of Aloe vera: A review. J. Herb. Med. 2018, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nicolau-Lapeña, I.; Colàs-Medà, P.; Alegre, I.; Aguiló-Aguayo, I.; Muranyi, P.; Viñas, I. Aloe vera gel: An update on its use as a functional edible coating to preserve fruits and vegetables. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 151, 106007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sogvar, O.B.; Koushesh Saba, M.; Emamifar, A. Aloe vera and ascorbic acid coatings maintain postharvest quality and reduce microbial load of strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 114, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hasan, M.U.; Riaz, R.; Malik, A.U.; Khan, A.S.; Anwar, R.; Rehman, R.N.U.; Ali, S. Potential of Aloe vera gel coating for storage life extension and quality conservation of fruits and vegetables: An overview. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ozturk, B.; Karakaya, O.; Yıldız, K.; Saracoglu, O. Effects of Aloe vera gel and MAP on bioactive compounds and quality attributes of cherry laurel fruit during cold storage. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 249, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ali, S.; Khan, A.S.; Nawaz, A.; Anjum, M.A.; Naz, S.; Ejaz, S.; Hussain, S. Aloe vera gel coating delays postharvest browning and maintains quality of harvested litchi fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 157, 110960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marpudi, S.L.; Pushkala, R.; Srividya, N. Aloe vera gel coating for post-harvest quality maintenance of fresh fig fruits. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 878–887. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ding, P.; Lee, Y. Use of essential oils for prolonging postharvest life of fresh fruits and vegetables. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 363–366. [Google Scholar]
  33. Perumal, A.B.; Sellamuthu, P.S.; Nambiar, R.B.; Sadiku, E.R. Effects of Essential Oil Vapour Treatment on the Postharvest Disease Control and Different Defence Responses in Two Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1131–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tawfeek, M.E.; Ali, H.M.; Akrami, M.; Salem, M.Z.M. Potential Insecticidal Activity of Four Essential Oils against the Rice Weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). BioResources 2021, 16, 7767–7783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moustafa, M.A.M.; Awad, M.; Amer, A.; Hassan, N.N.; Ibrahim, E.-D.S.; Ali, H.M.; Akrami, M.; Salem, M.Z.M. Insecticidal Activity of Lemongrass Essential Oil as an Eco-Friendly Agent against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 2021, 12, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mansour, M.M.A.; El-Hefny, M.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M. The Biofungicide Activity of Some Plant Essential Oils for the Cleaner Production of Model Linen Fibers Similar to Those Used in Ancient Egyptian Mummification. Processes 2020, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shah, G.; Shri, R.; Panchal, V.; Sharma, N.; Singh, B.; Mann, A.S. Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Cymbopogon citratus, stapf (Lemon grass). J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2011, 2, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Utama, I.M.S.; Yulianti, N.L.; Prastya, O.A.; Luther, G. Sesame and Lemon Grass Oils as Coating Materials to Reduce the Deterioration of Tomato Fruits during Storage. In Proceedings of the Indonesian Horticultural Society National Seminar, Malang, Indonesia, 6–9 November 2014; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  39. Helal, G.A.; Sarhan, M.M.; Shahla, A.N.K.A.; Ei-Khair, E.K.A. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Essential Oils Against Microorganisms Deteriorating Fruit Juices. Mycobiology 2006, 34, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Alamgir, A.N.M. (Ed.) Secondary Metabolites: Secondary Metabolic Products Consisting of C and H; C, H, and O; N, S, and P Elements; and O/N Heterocycles. In Therapeutic Use of Medicinal Plants and Their Extracts: Volume 2: Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 165–309. [Google Scholar]
  41. El-Gioushy, S.F.; Baiea, M.H.M. Impact of gelatin, lemongrass oil and peppermint oil on storability and fruit quality of Samany date palm under cold storage. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2020, 44, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Trang, D.T.; Hoang, T.K.V.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Van Cuong, P.; Dang, N.H.; Dang, H.D.; Nguyen Quang, T.; Dat, N.T. Essential Oils of Lemongrass Cymbopogon citratus Stapf Induces Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in A549 Lung Cancer Cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 5924856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Tran, T.H.; Tran, T.K.N.; Ngo, T.C.Q.; Pham, T.N.; Bach, L.G.; Phan, N.Q.A.; Le, T.H.N. Color and composition of beauty products formulated with lemongrass essential oil: Cosmetics formulation with lemongrass essential oil. Open Chem. 2021, 19, 820–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Whitaker, V.M.; Chandler, C.K.; Santos, B.M.; Peres, N.; Cecilia do Nascimento Nunes, M.; Plotto, A.; Sims, C.A. Winterstar™ (‘FL 05-107’) Strawberry. HortScience 2012, 47, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kumar, S.; Tiku, A.B. Immunomodulatory potential of acemannan (polysaccharide from Aloe vera) against radiation induced mortality in Swiss albino mice. Food Agric. Immunol. 2016, 27, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. El-Hefny, M.; Abo Elgat, W.A.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, H.M. Essential and Recovery Oils from Matricaria chamomilla Flowers as Environmentally Friendly Fungicides Against Four Fungi Isolated from Cultural Heritage Objects. Processes 2019, 7, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Okla, M.K.; Alamri, S.A.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M.; Behiry, S.I.; Nasser, R.A.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Al-Ghtani, S.M.; Soufan, W. Yield, Phytochemical Constituents, and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils from the Leaves/Twigs, Branches, Branch Wood, and Branch Bark of Sour Orange (Citrus aurantium L.). Processes 2019, 7, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shehata, S.A.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Ali, M.R.; Mohamed, R.M.; Bob, R.I.; Abdelgawad, K.F. Effect of Some Citrus Essential Oils on Post-Harvest Shelf Life and Physicochemical Quality of Strawberries during Cold Storage. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Granato, D.; Masson, M.L. Instrumental color and sensory acceptance of soy-based emulsions: A response surface approach. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 30, 1090–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (A.O.A.C.). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; The Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fuleki, T.; Francis, F.J. Quantitative Methods for Anthocyanins. J. Food Sci. 1968, 33, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. El-Hefny, M.; Ashmawy, N.A.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Salem, A.Z.M. Antibacterial activities of the phytochemicals-characterized extracts of Callistemon viminalis, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Conyza dioscoridis against the growth of some phytopathogenic bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 113, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hwang, E.-S.; Thi, N.D. Effects of Extraction and Processing Methods on Antioxidant Compound Contents and Radical Scavenging Activities of Laver (Porphyra tenera). Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 19, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hassan, H.S.; Mohamed, A.A.; Feleafel, M.N.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M.; Akrami, M.; Abd-Elkader, D.Y. Natural Plant Extracts and Microbial Antagonists to Control Fungal Pathogens and Improve the Productivity of Zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.) In Vitro and in Greenhouse. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M.; Akrami, M. Moringa oleifera seeds-removed ripened pods as alternative for papersheet production: Antimicrobial activity and their phytoconstituents profile using HPLC. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Herigstad, B.; Hamilton, M.; Heersink, J. How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 2001, 44, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Snedecor, W.; Cochran, G. Statistical Methods, 8th ed.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  58. López, A.; De Tangil, M.S.; Vega-Orellana, O.; Ramírez, A.S.; Rico, M. Phenolic Constituents, Antioxidant and Preliminary Antimycoplasmic Activities of Leaf Skin and Flowers of Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. (syn. A. barbadensis Mill.) from the Canary Islands (Spain). Molecules 2013, 18, 4942–4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Elbandy, M.A.; Abed, S.; Gad, S.; Abdel-Fadeel, M. Aloe vera gel as a functional ingredient and natural preservative in mango nectar. World J. Dairy Food Sci. 2014, 9, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Numan, I.N. Identification of Flavonoids and Phenolic Compound in Aloe vera gel by HPLC. Tikrit J. Pure Sci. 2018, 23, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Do, D.N.; Nguyen, H.T.T.; Huynh, T.H.; Nguyen, N.P.; Luu, X.C. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activities of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil and its fractions obtained by vacuum distillation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1166, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Verma, R.K.; Verma, R.S.; Chauhan, A.; Bisht, A. Evaluation of essential oil yield and chemical composition of eight lemongrass (Cymbopogon spp.) cultivars under Himalayan region. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2015, 27, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shaikh, M.N.; Suryawanshi, Y.C.; Mokat, D.N. Volatile Profiling and Essential Oil Yield of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Treated with Rhizosphere Fungi and Some Important Fertilizers. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tajidin, N.; Ahmad, S.; Rosenani, A.; Azimah, H.; Munirah, M. Chemical composition and citral content in lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil at three maturity stages. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 2685–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Rehman, M.A.; Asi, M.R.; Hameed, A.; Bourquin, L.D. Effect of Postharvest Application of Aloe vera Gel on Shelf Life, Activities of Anti-Oxidative Enzymes, and Quality of ‘Gola’ Guava Fruit. Foods 2020, 9, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Khaliq, G.; Abbas, H.T.; Ali, I.; Waseem, M. Aloe vera gel enriched with garlic essential oil effectively controls anthracnose disease and maintains postharvest quality of banana fruit during storage. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2019, 60, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Castillo, S.; Navarro, D.; Zapata, P.J.; Guillén, F.; Valero, D.; Serrano, M.; Martínez-Romero, D. Antifungal efficacy of Aloe vera in vitro and its use as a preharvest treatment to maintain postharvest table grape quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 57, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ravanfar, R.; Niakousari, M.; Maftoonazad, N. Postharvest sour cherry quality and safety maintenance by exposure to Hot- water or treatment with fresh Aloe vera gel. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2872–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Hazrati, S.; Beyraghdar Kashkooli, A.; Habibzadeh, F.; Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z.; Sadeghi, A.R. Evaluation of Aloe vera Gel as an Alternative Edible Coating for Peach Fruits During Cold Storage Period. Gesunde Pflanz. 2017, 69, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pinzon, M.I.; Sanchez, L.T.; Garcia, O.R.; Gutierrez, R.; Luna, J.C.; Villa, C.C. Increasing shelf life of strawberries (Fragaria ssp) by using a banana starch-chitosan-Aloe vera gel composite edible coating. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mohammadi, L.; Ramezanian, A.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Impact of Aloe vera gel coating enriched with basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil on postharvest quality of strawberry fruit. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Del-Valle, V.; Hernández-Muñoz, P.; Guarda, A.; Galotto, M.J. Development of a cactus-mucilage edible coating (Opuntia ficus indica) and its application to extend strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) shelf-life. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nadim, Z.; Ahmadi, E.; Sarikhani, H.; Amiri Chayjan, R. Effect of Methylcellulose-Based Edible Coating on Strawberry Fruit’s Quality Maintenance During Storage. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Atress, A.S.H.; El-Mogy, M.; Aboul-Anean, H.; Alsanius, B. Improving strawberry fruit storability by edible coating as a carrier of thymol or calcium chloride. J. Hortic. Sci. Ornam. Plants 2010, 2, 88–97. [Google Scholar]
  75. Gol, N.B.; Patel, P.R.; Rao, T.V.R. Improvement of quality and shelf-life of strawberries with edible coatings enriched with chitosan. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 85, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dhital, R.; Mora, N.B.; Watson, D.G.; Kohli, P.; Choudhary, R. Efficacy of limonene nano coatings on post-harvest shelf life of strawberries. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 97, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hassanpour, H. Effect of Aloe vera gel coating on antioxidant capacity, antioxidant enzyme activities and decay in raspberry fruit. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Azarakhsh, N.; Osman, A.; Ghazali, H.M.; Tan, C.P.; Mohd Adzahan, N. Lemongrass essential oil incorporated into alginate-based edible coating for shelf-life extension and quality retention of fresh-cut pineapple. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 88, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. García-Alonso, M.; Rimbach, G.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; de Pascual-Teresa, S. Antioxidant and Cellular Activities of Anthocyanins and Their Corresponding Vitisins A Studies in Platelets, Monocytes, and Human Endothelial Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 3378–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bhat, R.; Stamminger, R. Impact of ultraviolet radiation treatments on the physicochemical properties, antioxidants, enzyme activity and microbial load in freshly prepared hand pressed strawberry juice. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2014, 21, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Shah, S.; Hashmi, M.S. Chitosan–Aloe vera gel coating delays postharvest decay of mango fruit. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ehtesham Nia, A.; Taghipour, S.; Siahmansour, S. Pre-harvest application of chitosan and postharvest Aloe vera gel coating enhances quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Yaghouti’) during postharvest period. Food Chem. 2021, 347, 129012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, Q.; Hu, Y.; Xu, J. Free radical-scavenging activity of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) extracts by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hidayati, J.R.; Yudiati, E.; Pringgenies, D.; Oktaviyanti, D.T.; Kusuma, A.P. Comparative Study on Antioxidant Activities, Total Phenolic Compound and Pigment Contents of Tropical Spirulina platensis, Gracilaria arcuata and Ulva lactuca Extracted in Different Solvents Polarity. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 147, 03012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Tungmunnithum, D.; Thongboonyou, A.; Pholboon, A.; Yangsabai, A. Flavonoids and Other Phenolic Compounds from Medicinal Plants for Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects: An Overview. Medicines 2018, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hannum, S.M. Potential Impact of Strawberries on Human Health: A Review of the Science. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Co, H.; Markakis, P. Flavonoid Compounds in the Strawberry Fruit. J. Food Sci. 1968, 33, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sun, Y.; Asghari, M.; Zahedipour-Sheshgelani, P. Foliar Spray with 24-Epibrassinolide Enhanced Strawberry Fruit Quality, Phytochemical Content, and Postharvest Life. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Esmaeili, Y.; Zamindar, N.; Paidari, S.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Mohammadi Nafchi, A. The synergistic effects of Aloe vera gel and modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of strawberry fruit. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Arrubla Vélez, J.P.; Guerrero Álvarez, G.E.; Vargas Soto, M.C.; Cardona Hurtado, N.; Pinzón, M.I.; Villa, C.C. Aloe Vera Gel Edible Coating for Shelf Life and Antioxidant Proprieties Preservation of Andean Blackberry. Processes 2021, 9, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Solís-Contreras, G.A.; Rodríguez-Guillermo, M.C.; de la Luz Reyes-Vega, M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Rebolloso-Padilla, O.N.; Corona-Flores, J.; de Abril Alexandra Soriano-Melgar, L.; Ruelas-Chacon, X. Extending Shelf-Life and Quality of Minimally Processed Golden Delicious Apples with Three Bioactive Coatings Combined with Cinnamon Essential Oil. Foods 2021, 10, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martínez-Romero, D.; Alburquerque, N.; Valverde, J.M.; Guillén, F.; Castillo, S.; Valero, D.; Serrano, M. Postharvest sweet cherry quality and safety maintenance by Aloe vera treatment: A new edible coating. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 39, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rasouli, M.; Koushesh Saba, M.; Ramezanian, A. Inhibitory effect of salicylic acid and Aloe vera gel edible coating on microbial load and chilling injury of orange fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 247, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Antara, N.S.; Paramita, D.; Duwipayana, A.A.; Gunam, I. Inhibitory activity of lemongrass essential oil against Eschericia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Vibrio cholera. In Proceedings of the Seminar Nasional Patpi 2013, Jember, Indonesia, 26–29 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  95. Velkov, Z.; Balabanova, E.; Tadjer, A. Radical scavenging activity prediction of o-coumaric acid thioamide. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2007, 821, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Coatings 12 00489 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenolic profile of A. vera gel by HPLC.
Figure 1. Phenolic profile of A. vera gel by HPLC.
Coatings 12 00489 g001
Coatings 12 00489 g002 550
Figure 2. Weight loss (%) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letter/s shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p < 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 2. Weight loss (%) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letter/s shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p < 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g002
Coatings 12 00489 g003 550
Figure 3. Firmness (N) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 3. Firmness (N) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g003
Coatings 12 00489 g004 550
Figure 4. SSC (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 4. SSC (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g004
Coatings 12 00489 g005 550
Figure 5. Titratable acidity (%) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 5. Titratable acidity (%) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g005
Coatings 12 00489 g006 550
Figure 6. pH (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 6. pH (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g006
Coatings 12 00489 g007 550
Figure 7. Total anthocyanin (mg of cyanidin chloride.gm−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 7. Total anthocyanin (mg of cyanidin chloride.gm−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g007
Coatings 12 00489 g008 550
Figure 8. Total phenolic content (mg of gallic acid.100 g fw−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 8. Total phenolic content (mg of gallic acid.100 g fw−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g008
Coatings 12 00489 g009 550
Figure 9. Antioxidant activity (% capacity) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments after being stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 9. Antioxidant activity (% capacity) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments after being stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g009
Coatings 12 00489 g010 550
Figure 10. EDX analysis for the elemental composition of strawberry fruits as affected by different treatments; each treatment was measured at three points.
Figure 10. EDX analysis for the elemental composition of strawberry fruits as affected by different treatments; each treatment was measured at three points.
Coatings 12 00489 g010
Coatings 12 00489 g011 550
Figure 11. TMM (103 CFU.g−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when store for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 11. TMM (103 CFU.g−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when store for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g011
Coatings 12 00489 g012 550
Figure 12. TYM (CFU g−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Figure 12. TYM (CFU g−1) (mean ± S.E.) of strawberry fruits stored at 5 °C as affected by coating treatments when stored for different lengths of time in both experiments. The mean ± S.E. of treatments in the figures with the same letters shows a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05. AV: A. vera gel. (a) First experiment; (b) second experiment.
Coatings 12 00489 g012
Table
Table 1. Fruit coating treatments used in the present study.
Table 1. Fruit coating treatments used in the present study.
TreatmentsConcentration
1Control
2A. vera gel 20% (v/v)
3A. vera gel 40% (v/v)
4A. vera gel 20% + lemongrass EO 1%
5A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1%
Table
Table 2. Identification of the phenolic compounds in A. vera gel by HPLC.
Table 2. Identification of the phenolic compounds in A. vera gel by HPLC.
R.T. (min)CompoundConcentration (mg/mL)
5.00Coumaric acid22.4
7.01Ferulic acid8.22
8.00Caffeic acid30.77
9.00Syringic acid15.12
11.10Sinapic acid14.05
15.00Cinnamic acid7.14
R.T.: retention time.
Table
Table 3. Phytochemical constituents of lemongrass EO identified by GC–MS.
Table 3. Phytochemical constituents of lemongrass EO identified by GC–MS.
Chemical CompoundPercentage (%)MF
Linalool1.77861
Isocitral0.97853
Isoneral6.67943
α-Citral (Neral)40.10930
β-Citral (Geranial)30.71916
Citral1.22931
Neryl acetal5.64876
γ-Dodecalactone10.24912
Geraniol acetate0.91897
2-Tridecanone0.70867
Nizatidine0.32979
β-Caryophyllene epoxide0.36917
Selin-6-en-4β-ol0.40892
MF: match factor.
Table
Table 4. Color values of strawberry fruits as affected by coating treatments after 0, 8, and 16 days of storage at 5 °C in Experiment 1.
Table 4. Color values of strawberry fruits as affected by coating treatments after 0, 8, and 16 days of storage at 5 °C in Experiment 1.
Experiment 1
TreatmentsDaysL*a*b*h°
Control043.83 ± 1.21 b43.64 ± 1.89 b21.05 + 2.87 b1.97 + 1.12 ab
835.66 ± 2.24 d44.93 ± 2.13 b20.87 + 1.87 b1.57 + 0.87 d
1633.70 ± 1.54 e45.45 ± 1.97 ab19.16 + 1.22 cd1.90 + 0.58 b
A. vera gel
20%		043.83 ± 1.21 b43.64 ± 1.89 b21.05 ± 2.87 b1.97 ± 1.12 ab
839.40 ± 1.32 cd49.47 ± 2.54 a19.48 ± 2.01 cd1.37 ± 1.02 ef
1635.61 ± 1.12 d44.63 ± 2.33 b17.07 ± 1.33 d1.57 ± 0.98 d
A. vera gel
40%		043.83 ± 1.21 b43.64 ± 1.89 b21.05 ± 2.87 b1.97 ± 1.12 ab
838.40 ± 2.12 cd44.05 ± 2.01 b18.49 ± 1.21 cd1.45 ± 1.03 e
1636.84 ± 1.34 d44.87 ± 2.44 b16.28 ± 1.32 d1.15 ± 0.45 f
A. vera gel 20%
+ lemongrass
EO 1%		043.83 ± 1.21 b43.64 ± 1.89 b21.05 ± 2.87 b1.97 ± 1.12 ab
837.80 ± 2.65 cd36.43 ± 2.12 c25.25 ± 1.56 ab2.03 ± 1.11 a
1649.90 ± 1.67 a36.97 ± 2.03 c28.59 ± 1.12 a2.03 ± 1.01 a
A. vera gel 20%
+ lemongrass
EO 1%		043.83 ± 1.21 b43.64 ± 1.89 b21.05 ± 2.87 b1.97 ± 1.12 ab
844.05 ± 1.78 b35.14 ± 2.43 c22.42 ± 1.65 b1.84 ± 0.55 cd
1646.80 ± 2.03 a34.57 ± 2.63 c25.93 ± 1.78 ab1.81 ± 0.98 cd
The mean values with the same superscript letter/s in the same column show a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Color values of strawberry fruits as affected by coating treatments after 0, 8, and 16 days of storage at 5 °C in Experiment 2.
Table 5. Color values of strawberry fruits as affected by coating treatments after 0, 8, and 16 days of storage at 5 °C in Experiment 2.
Experimental 2
TreatmentsDaysL*a*b*h°
Control043.49 ± 2.44 c42.07 ± 2.61 b20.39 ± 1.77 b1.89 ± 0.31 c
834.71 ± 2.03 e43.87 ± 2.11 b19.83 ± 1.34 c1.27 ± 0.61 e
1633.23 ± 1.65 f42.69 ± 1.34 b18.66 ± 1.01 c2.07 ± 0.54 b
A. vera gel
20%		043.49 ± 2.44 c42.07 ± 2.61 b20.39 ± 1.77 b1.89 ± 0.31 c
840.52 ± 2.23 d47.48 ± 2.43 a18.73 ± 1.22 c1.96 ± 1.21 bc
1634.67 ± 2.01 e43.25 ± 1.87 b17.16 ± 1.02 d2.75 ± 1.32 a
A. vera gel
40%		043.49 ± 2.44 c42.07 ± 2.61 b20.39 ± 1.77 b1.89 ± 0.31 c
839.94 ± 2.46 d46.71 ± 2.21 a18.49 ± 1.67 d1.54 ± 0.64 d
1635.17 ± 1.78 e43.22 ± 1.44 b20.10 ± 1.25 b1.37 ± 0.67 e
A. vera gel 20%
+ lemongrass
EO 1%		043.49 ± 2.44 c42.07 ± 2.61 b20.39 ± 1.77 b1.89 ± 0.31 c
847.18 ± 2.67 a36.20 ± 1.98 c26.88 ± 1.06 ab1.08 ± 0.23 g
1648.50 ± 2.43 a37.30 ± 1.66 c29.73 ± 1.33 a1.95 ± 0.35 bc
A. vera gel 20%
+ lemongrass
EO 1%		043.49 ± 2.44 c42.07 ± 2.61 b20.39 ± 1.77 b1.89 ± 0.31 c
845.37 ± 1.56 b35.86 ± 1.78 d26.99 ± 1.89 ab1.16 ± 0.33 f
1647.08 ± 1.32 d34.19 ± 1.56 d27.19 ± 1.65 a1.86 ± 0.54 c
The mean values with the same superscript letter/s in the same column show a nonsignificant difference according to Duncan multiple range test for p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 6. Flavonoid concentration in strawberry fruit as affected by different treatments of A. vera gel and lemongrass EO.
Table 6. Flavonoid concentration in strawberry fruit as affected by different treatments of A. vera gel and lemongrass EO.
R.T. (min)CompoundConcentration of Flavonoid Compounds (μg/mL) in Strawberry Fruit as Treated by
Initial
(0 day)		ControlA. vera 20%A. vera 40%A. vera 20% + Lemongrass EO 1%A. vera 40% + Lemongrass EO 1%
4.6Rutin6.149.14ND7.137.1416.25
5.2Naringin5.168.16ND6.19ND5.66
6.0IsorhamnetinNDNDNDNDND10.23
6.9Quercetin10.4115.2315.368.479.569.66
8.1Kaempferol5.176.176.1520.4722.1711.43
9.0Luteolin7.137.4614.66ND8.15ND
10.0Hesperidin13.4514.568.12NDND22.15
11.07-HydroxyflavoneNDNDND14.1612.028.14
12.01Catechin8.149.5220.5611.7816.111.13
14.6GenisteinNDNDNDNDND3.52
15.0Chrysoeriol25.08ND4.2117.447.6615.04
15.2MyricetinNDNDND2.25NDND
ND: not detected; R.T.: retention time.
Table
Table 7. Elemental analysis of strawberry fruits coated by A. vera gel and lemongrass EO.
Table 7. Elemental analysis of strawberry fruits coated by A. vera gel and lemongrass EO.
TreatmentElement (Atom %)
COSiPKCaMgN
Control42.36 ± 0.26 ad55.61 ± 0.21 ab0.25 ± 0.12 a0.14 ± 0.02 a1.33 ± 0.12 b0.31 ± 0.05 bndnd
A. vera gel 20%41.30 ± 1.35 b56.10 ± 1.11 a0.49 ± 0.49 a0.17 ± 0.05 a1.54 ± 0.16 ab0.25 ± 0.02 b0.15 ± 0.08 abnd
A. vera gel 40%41.75 ± 1.12 b55.01 ± 0.17 ab1.04 ± 0.76 ab0.11 ± 0.01 ab1.10 ± 0.06 b0.38 ± 0.13 b0.19 ± 0.04 a0.40 ± 0.40
A. vera gel 20% + lemongrass EO 1%43.61 ± 0.80 ad53.74 ± 0.56 b0.63 ± 0.41 b0.04 ± 0.01 ab1.48 ± 0.20 ab0.48 ± 0.03 b0.03 ± 0.03 bcnd
A. vera gel 40% + lemongrass EO 1%45.06 ± 0.66 a51.54 ± 0.56 c0.15 ± 0.15 a0.17 ± 0.02 a1.80 ± 0.07 a1.23 ± 0.14 a0.05 ± 0.03 abcnd
p-value0.0908 ns0.00300.6712 ns0.0652 ns0.0516 ns0.00010.0612 ns-
ns: not significant; the mean values with the same superscript letter/s within the same column show a nonsignificant difference according to LSD at 0.05 level of probability. nd: not detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassan, H.S.; EL-Hefny, M.; Ghoneim, I.M.; El-Lahot, M.S.R.A.; Akrami, M.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Abd-Elkader, D.Y. Assessing the Use of Aloe vera Gel Alone and in Combination with Lemongrass Essential Oil as a Coating Material for Strawberry Fruits: HPLC and EDX Analyses. Coatings 2022, 12, 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12040489

AMA Style

Hassan HS, EL-Hefny M, Ghoneim IM, El-Lahot MSRA, Akrami M, Al-Huqail AA, Ali HM, Abd-Elkader DY. Assessing the Use of Aloe vera Gel Alone and in Combination with Lemongrass Essential Oil as a Coating Material for Strawberry Fruits: HPLC and EDX Analyses. Coatings. 2022; 12(4):489. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12040489

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassan, Hanaa S., Mervat EL-Hefny, Ibrahim M. Ghoneim, Mina S. R. Abd El-Lahot, Mohammad Akrami, Asma A. Al-Huqail, Hayssam M. Ali, and Doaa Y. Abd-Elkader. 2022. "Assessing the Use of Aloe vera Gel Alone and in Combination with Lemongrass Essential Oil as a Coating Material for Strawberry Fruits: HPLC and EDX Analyses" Coatings 12, no. 4: 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12040489

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop