Next Article in Journal
Thin Films on the Surface of GaAs, Obtained by Chemically Stimulated Thermal Oxidation, as Materials for Gas Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
The Mode Deformation Effect on Surface Nanocrystalline Structure Formation and Wear Resistance of Steel 41Cr4
Previous Article in Journal
A Practical Design Guide for Unbonded Jointed Plain Concrete Roads over Deteriorated HMA Roads: Realistic Traffic Loading
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Novel Low-Carbon Martensitic Steel to Maraging Steel in Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microstructure, Fatigue, Wear Properties of Steels

1
State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
2
Key Laboratory of Mechanical Reliability for Heavy Equipments and Large Structures of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(12), 1818; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121818
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 24 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microstructure, Fatigue and Wear Properties of Steels)
Green manufacturing is a hot topic in the manufacturing industry. Steel manufacturing produces carbon emissions; to achieve “green steel”, it is a reasonable means to improve the service performance of steel and reduce production time. Microstructure regulation has proven effective at realizing a high service life of steel. From the perspective of bainitic steel, it accelerates bainite transformation, improves comprehensive properties, and possesses excellent service properties, including wear and fatigue properties.
Presently, it is an important way to provide an effective nucleation interface or location to accelerate bainite transformation [1,2,3]. It is feasible to form pre-ferrite, pre-martensite and pre-second-phase particles. The study [4] illustrates that the control of heat treatment in the high-temperature zone will form ferrite at the austenite grain boundary. This step accelerates the formation kinetics of bainite, which is mainly due to the increase in the density of bainite nucleation points. The bainite ferrite can be nucleated at the austenite/austenite interface at the initial nucleation point, or at the austenite/ferrite interface at the secondary nucleation point [5]. However, some literature reports that the formation of some ferrites will increase the carbon content in the remaining austenite, which may prolong the transformation time. This is also the contradiction of current research [6]. Quidor et al. [7] believe that when the proportion of ferrite is small, the carbon distribution has no significant effect on the reduction of driving force for bainite formation. One of the strategies for high bainite formation rate is to form part of martensite before bainite formation. Kawata et al. [8] found that the bainite transformation of austenite martensite duplex structure is faster than that of single-phase austenite in Fe-0.2C-8Ni alloy pre-forming martensite, and they believed that the acceleration of bainite transformation is caused by the increase in nucleation position at the martensite/austenite interface. It is speculated that the dislocation released into austenite through martensite transformation is helpful for bainite nucleation. Gong and Smanio et al. [9,10] believed that the introduction of a small amount of martensite volume fraction can accelerate the transformation of bainite. At the same time, the bainite lath shows almost the same orientation as the adjacent existing martensite plates. The dislocations introduced in austenite are the companion variant selection of auxiliary bainite transformation, and the bainite nucleation point increases [9]. The researchers also analyzed the crystal characteristics of pre-martensite and bainite [11]. The precipitation of the second phase is also one of the methods used to effectively increase the nucleation interface. Taking alloy element V as an example, it is a strong carbonitride-forming element. Adding V in the continuous cooling process can broaden the bainite transformation zone [12]. Bainitic ferrite can nucleate at the position with low carbon concentration near the VC/austenite interface. Due to the different thermal expansion coefficients of VC and austenite, the strain field and dislocation field are generated, which reduces the barrier to bainite ferrite nucleation [13]. Ravi et al. [14] have shown that the nucleation ability of bainite is affected by the interface energy between precipitates and matrix. Before isothermal treatment of bainite, small VC particles accelerate the initial transformation and shorten the incubation period [15]. These research methods accelerate the transformation, but also affect the microstructure. This is one of the research directions.
The change in microstructure will affect the properties of steel. In bainitic steel, the quantity, morphology and size of bainitic ferrite and retained austenite affect the wear and fatigue. Research shows that the wear rate increases at a higher transformation temperature and retains austenite content [16]. For the microstructure with higher stability of retained austenite, the improvement of toughness and TRIP effect are conducive to improving the wear resistance of materials [17]. Chang et al. [18] found that carbide-free bainitic steel has excellent wear resistance, because plastic deformation induced by deformation can effectively improve the material plasticity and further improve the wear resistance. Many studies have shown that high-carbon, low-temperature carbide-free bainite steel has high wear resistance and is closely related to the bainite transformation temperature [19,20]. Microstructure also plays an important role in fatigue testing. Shendy et al. [21] found that thinner bainite ferrite thickness, higher carbon content of retained austenite, larger volume fraction of bainite ferrite content and lower volume fraction of massive retained austenite can improve the fatigue strength of materials. It was also found that in the interior of retained austenite, due to its lower carbon content and stability, shear strain and secondary cracks are likely to occur in the center of the blocky retained austenite [21]. Solano Alvarez and Bhadeshia et al. [22,23] carried out a rolling contact fatigue test on low-temperature bainite and found that microcracks occur at the interface of martensite and bainite formed by strain-induced transformation of retained austenite. The film-retained austenite shows high stability under rolling contact fatigue conditions because of its high carbon content and small scale [24,25]. Qian et al. [26] further studied the substructure in the process of cyclic deformation and believed that the dislocation evolution of carbide-free bainitic steel was the main reason for the first cycle of cyclic hardening. Marinelli et al. [27] found that if the degree of orientation dislocation between two different crystallographic bainite blocks is large, the crack growth is prevented at the boundary on both sides. Conversely, if there is no change in the active slip plane between the bainite blocks, microcrack growth will occur inside the bainite ferrite lath of the adjacent blocks.
In conclusion, the behavior of wear and fatigue is an important research direction in relation to bainitic steel. When applied to practical engineering components, its service conditions and working environment are important factors affecting the life of bainitic steel. This Special Issue of Coatings collects original research articles and review papers. Contributions will focus on the microstructure and property control of steel, as well as service properties. It will emphasize the potential of the covered subject in addressing these important societal challenges.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52001275), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2020203084).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ravi, A.M.; Sietsma, J.; Santofimia, M.J. Exploring bainite formation kinetics distinguishing grain-boundary and autocatalytic nucleation in high and low-Si steels. Acta Mater. 2016, 105, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Santofimia, M.J.; Caballero, F.G.; Capdevila, C.; García-Mateo, C.; de Andrés, C.G. Evaluation of Displacive Models for Bainite Transformation Kinetics in Steels. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Farahani, H.; Xu, W.; Zwaag, S.V.D. Prediction and Validation of the Austenite Phase Fraction upon Intercritical Annealing of Medium Mn Steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2015, 46, 4978–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ravi, A.M.; Kumar, A.; Herbig, M.; Sietsma, J.; Santofimia, M.J. Impact of austenite grain boundaries and ferrite nucleation on bainite formation in steels. Acta Mater. 2020, 188, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Robertson, J.M. The microstructure of rapidly cooled steel. J. Iron. Steel Inst. 1929, 119, 391–419. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhu, K.; Chen, H.; Masse, J.-P.; Bouaziz, O.; Gachet, G. The effect of prior ferrite formation on bainite and martensite transformation kinetics in advanced high-strength steels. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 6025–6036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Quidort, D.; Brechet, Y. Isothermal growth kinetics of bainite in 0.5% C steels. Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 4161–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawata, H.; Hayashi, K.; Sugiura, N.; Yoshinaga, N.; Takahashi, M. Effect of Martensite in Initial Structure on Bainite Transformation. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 638, 3307–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gong, W.; Tomota, Y.; Harjo, S. Effect of prior martensite on bainite transformation in nanobainite steel. Acta Mater. 2015, 85, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smanio, V.; Sourmail, T. Effect of Partial Martensite Transformation on Bainite Reaction Kinetics in Different 1%C Steels. Solid State Phenom. 2011, 172, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samanta, S.; Biswas, P.; Giri, S.; Singh, S.B.; Kundu, S. Formation of bainite below the MS temperature: Kinetics and crystallography. Acta Mater. 2016, 105, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Z.; Hui, W.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X. Effect of vanadium on microstructure and mechanical properties of bainitic forging steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 771, 138653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Furuhara, T.; Yamaguchi, J.; Sugita, N.; Miyamoto, G.; Maki, T. Nucleation of Proeutectoid Ferrite on Complex Precipitates in Austenite. Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 2003, 43, 1630–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ravi, A.M.; Sietsma, J.; Santofimia, M.J. Bainite formation kinetics in steels and the dynamic nature of the autocatalytic nucleation process. Scr. Mater. 2017, 140, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, D.; Liu, C.; Long, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Lv, B.; Zhang, F.; Yang, Z. Effect of introduced vanadium carbide at the bay region on bainite transformation, microstructure and mechanical properties of high-carbon and high-silicon steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2021, 811, 141055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vuorinen, E.; Wang, L.; Stanojevic, S.; Prakash, B. Influence of Retained Austenite on Rolling–sliding Wear Resistance of Austempered Silicon Alloyed Steel. In Proceedings of the Hot Sheet Metal Forming of High-Performance Steel, 2nd International Conference, Luleå, Sweden, 15–17 June 2009. [Google Scholar]
  17. Leiro, A.; Vuorinen, E.; Sundin, K.; Prakash, B.; Sourmail, T.; Smanio, V.; Caballero, F.; Garcia-Mateo, C.; Elvira, R. Wear of Nano-structured Carbide-free Bainitic Steels under Dry Rolling–sliding Conditions. Wear 2013, 298, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chang, L.C. The Rolling/sliding Wear Performance of High Silicon Carbide-free Bainitic Steels. Wear 2005, 258, 730–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, P.; Zhang, F.C.; Yan, Z.G.; Wang, T.S.; Qian, L.H. Wear Property of Low-temperature Bainite in the Surface Layer of A Ccarburized Low Carbon Steel. Wear 2011, 271, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, J.; Wang, T.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, F. Sliding Wear Resistance and Worn Surface Microstructure of Nanostructured Bainitic Steel. Wear 2012, 282, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shendy, B.R.; Yoozbashi, M.N.; Avishan, B. An Investigation on Rotating Bending Fatigue Behavior of Nanostructured Low-Temperature Bainitic Steel. Acta Metall. Sin.-Engl. Lett. 2014, 27, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. Steels for Bearings. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2012, 57, 268–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Solano-Alvarez, W.; Pickering, E.J.; Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. Degradation of Nanostructured Bainitic Steel under Rolling Contact Fatigue. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 617, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Caballero, F.G.; Miller, M.K.; Mateo, C.G. Opening Previously Impossible Avenues for Phase Transformation in Innovative Steels by Atom Probe Tomography. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, H.S.; Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. Austenite Grain Size and the Martensite-start Temperature. Scr. Mater. 2009, 60, 493–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, Q.; Qian, L.; Meng, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, F. Low-cycle Fatigue Behavior and Microstructural Evolution in a Low-carbon Carbide-free Bainitic Steel. Mater. Des. 2015, 85, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marinelli, M.C.; Alvarez-Armas, I.; Krupp, U. Short Crack Behavior during Low-cycle Fatigue in High-strength Bainitic Steel. Procedia Eng. 2016, 160, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Long, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, R. Microstructure, Fatigue, Wear Properties of Steels. Coatings 2022, 12, 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121818

AMA Style

Long X, Zhang Y, Liu W, Zhang Z, Zhu R. Microstructure, Fatigue, Wear Properties of Steels. Coatings. 2022; 12(12):1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Long, Xiaoyan, Yu Zhang, Wei Liu, Zhen Zhang, and Ranran Zhu. 2022. "Microstructure, Fatigue, Wear Properties of Steels" Coatings 12, no. 12: 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121818

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop