Next Article in Journal
Research and Progress of Laser Cladding: Process, Materials and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Calcium Orthophosphate (CaPO4)-Based Bioceramics: Preparation, Properties, and Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation, Corrosion Resistance, and Electrochemical Properties of MnO2/TiO2 Coating on Porous Titanium

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Fengming Road, Jinan 250101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(10), 1381; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101381
Submission received: 23 August 2022 / Revised: 17 September 2022 / Accepted: 20 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022

Abstract

:
In this work, MnO2/TiO2 coating on metallic porous titanium was prepared through a hydrothermal-based chemical method, followed by a chemical precipitation reaction of KMnO4 and MnSO4 aqueous solutions. The surface of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti was uniform and compact, with a high load capacity. The corrosion resistance and electrochemical properties of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti coating were investigated in comparison with those of pure Ti and TiO2 coatings. Cyclic voltammetry and constant current charge–discharge measurements showed that the MnO2/TiO2/Ti electrode presented good electrochemical performance. The MnO2/TiO2/Ti electrode had the highest capacitor performance compared to the other electrodes, and the nano-MnO2 coating significantly decreased the corrosion current densities. The nano-MnO2 coating exhibited excellent anti-corrosion properties at room temperature and better capacitance performance compared with pure Ti and TiO2 coatings. After surface modification, TiO2/Ti-coated MnO2 had better electrochemical behavior and significantly improved corrosion resistance than the TiO2/Ti nanocomposites. Its specific capacitance reached 314 F/g, which was 3.5 times that of the TiO2/Ti electrode material.

1. Introduction

With the advent of the 5G era, environmental pollution and the clean energy crisis have become serious social problems in the process of economic and social progress, and increasingly more research is focused on the development of new energy storage systems [1]. As an important energy storage system, supercapacitors have been widely studied for their high power density and fast charge and discharge [2,3,4,5]. Supercapacitors are generally divided into double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) and pseudocapacitors. EDLCs store energy electrostatically through surface ion adsorption/desorption at the electrode/electrolyte interface, while pseudocapacitors utilize fast and reversible superficial Faradaic reactions between electrolyte ions and electroactive materials [6,7,8]. In general, the value of an EDLCs is much less than that of a psedocapacitor [9]. Manganese dioxide (MnO2) is a promising pseudocapacitive material that has attracted widespread attention for use in many electroactive materials due to its low cost, low natural abundance, wide electrochemical potential window, and high theoretical capacitance value (1370 F/g) [10,11]. However, the inherently poor conductivity and easy dissolution of manganese dioxide hinder the realization of its high electrochemical properties. In contrast, TiO2 has a higher electrical conductivity and electrochemical stability compared with MnO2 [12].
Combining manganese dioxide with other materials (such as titanium dioxide [13], zinc oxide [14], and diferric trioxide [15]) to improve the conductivity and stability of the electrode material and leverage its advantages [13,16,17,18,19] may be an effective way to overcome these problems. Compared to manganese dioxide, titanium dioxide has higher electrical conductivity and electrochemical stability [20]. The use of binary metal oxide nanocomposite electrode materials has received widespread attention due to their special physical properties and potential applications [21]. Titanium dioxide is one of the most studied non-silicon mesoporous metal oxides due to its wide applications in photocatalysis, solar cells, chemical sensors, and bioanalytical chemistry [22,23,24,25]. Furthermore, Kaseem and co-workers reported the importance of TiO2 coating in electrochemical and biomedical applications based on plasma electrolytic oxidation or micro-arc oxidation coating treatment [26,27,28,29]. However, due to the high price of titanium raw materials and the difficulty of manufacturing, these are not often used in daily life. Titanium matrix composites have the advantages of being lightweight with high strength, good corrosion resistance, and good biocompatibility. TiO2 nanomaterials have a high degree of order and a large specific surface area, so that the transmission path between ions and other electrons is reduced. This reduces the disadvantage of its poor conductivity. Furthermore, MnO2 can be deposited on its surface, thereby increasing the capacitance. In addition, the electrochemical performance of MnO2 is limited by the electronic conductivity of densely packed matter without a porous structure [30].
In this paper, we successfully prepared a novel MnO2/TiO2/Ti sandwich nanostructure by a chemical co-precipitation reaction of potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and manganese sulfate (MnSO4) with an alternating immersion method. First, we placed purchased commercial foam titanium into a reactor for a hydrothermal reaction after anhydrous ethanol treatment, followed by annealing the titanium at 600 °C in a muffle furnace, and finally used a KMnO4, H2O, and MnSO4 for alternating soaking treatments to obtain a nanocomposite electrode material with good conductivity through a further redox deposition reaction. The prepared MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites exhibited excellent corrosion resistance, specific capacitance, and cycle stability.

2. Experimental

2.1. Metallic Porous Titanium Processing

In this study, metallic porous titanium (with a thickness of about 1.0–1.20 mm, Ti purity > 99.9 wt%, Suzhou Terry Foam Metal Factory, China) was used as the raw material. The porous titanium was cut into small rectangular pieces with the specifications of width × length × thickness = 20 mm × 40 mm × 1 mm. The porous Ti plates were then ultrasonically cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and ultrapurified water for 15 min sequentially and then dried at room temperature [31].

2.2. Preparation of TiO2/Ti Nanomaterial

The TiO2/Ti nanomaterial was prepared via a facile alkaline hydrothermal method, which was derived from the method proposed for constructing a porous titanate layer on the surface of a titanium foil [31]. First, 20 mL of aqueous NaOH (98.0%, Jiangyin Runma Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., Jiangyin, China) solution (10 mol/L) was prepared. The aqueous NaOH solution was cooled to room temperature, and the cooled NaOH solution and foaming titanium were placed in a reaction kettle successively. The reaction kettle was placed in a vacuum-drying oven for hydrothermal treatment at 110 °C for 24 h. The kettle was removed under ambient pressure, cooled to room temperature, and the samples were removed with clean forceps. The samples were washed with deionized water to thoroughly remove the porous Ti to obtain the Na2Ti3O7 nanomaterials. The nanomaterials were then immersed in 0.1 M HCl (36.0% to 38.0%, Chongqing Chuandong Chemical Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China) aqueous solution for 24 h at room temperature. The acid-treated Na2Ti3O7 nanomaterials were thoroughly washed with deionized water to obtain the H2Ti3O7 nanomaterials [32]. The crucible was soaked in nitric acid (60%, Chongqing Chuandong Chemical Group Co., Ltd., China) for 15 min, and the acid-treated crucible was neutralized with NaOH solution. The treated crucible was cleaned with deionized water until the pH of the cleaning solution was neutral. The H2Ti3O7 nanomaterials were placed in the treated crucible and heated in a muffle furnace at 600 °C for 2 h for annealing to finally obtain the TiO2 nanoelectrode materials.

2.3. Preparation of MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite Electrode Materials

The MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite electrode material was prepared using an alternating immersion method. The previously annealed TiO2 electrode nanomaterials were immersed in 0.15 mol/L manganese sulfate (99.0%, Tianjin Dengfeng Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China) solution for 30 s, then removed and immersed in deionized water for 30 s, then immersed in 0.1 mol/L potassium permanganate (analytically pure, Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) solution for 30 s, and finally immersed in deionized water for 30 s to complete an alternating immersion cycle. The operation was repeated six times. At the end of the complete process, the samples were thoroughly cleaned with deionized water by soaking in the water for 15 min and then rinsing with running deionized water. The samples were dried in a constant-temperature drying oven for 2 h at 60 °C. At the end of the process, the samples were sealed and stored for future use.

2.4. Material Property Characterization and Electrochemical Testing

The crystalline structures of the products were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) in a Bruker D8 Advance powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). Raman scattering has been applied previously to the structural characterization of manganese dioxides; therefore, a Laba RAM HR Evolution UV Raman spectrometer (Horiba, France) was used to analyze the Raman spectra of the experimental samples. The data point acquisition time was 30 s. The excitation was performed under a diode laser with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm and a laser power of 9.1 mW, and the spectral region was 50–900 nm. The morphologies of the prepared electrode materials were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The SEM images were taken using an SU3800 microscope. The properties of the prepared samples were tested using Tafel curves, cyclic voltammetry (CV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) using a CHI760E electrochemical workstation. The tests were performed using a standard three-electrode system with titanium foam, TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti as the working electrodes, a platinum electrode as the auxiliary electrode, and a saturated glycogen electrode as the reference electrode. The electrolyte system of the test sample was a 0.5 mol/L KOH solution, the scanning potential was from −0.2 to 0.7 V, the scanning speed was 10 mV/s, and the number of scanning turns was 10.

3. Results and Discussion

The crystal phases of the commercialized Ti and the structure of the prepared TiO2/Ti and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite membrane materials were characterized by XRD. As can be seen from Figure 1, porous titanium and standard titanium metal (PDF#44-1924) corresponded very well, with no stray peaks. Except for the peaks corresponding to metal titanium, the diffraction peaks of TiO2/Ti corresponded well to TiO2 anatase phase peaks (PDF#21-1272). The strongest peaks at 2θ = 25.4°, 37.8°, 48.0°, 53.9°, and 55.1° corresponded to the (101), (004), (200), (105), and (211) surfaces of the anatase phase, respectively [33]. The diffraction peak of MnO2 was not clearly evident in the XRD pattern, and further characterization was required to determine the presence of MnO2.
Raman spectroscopy was performed on the metal porous Ti and the prepared TiO2/Ti and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite samples. The Raman peaks shown in the Ti and TiO2/Ti curves of Figure 2 were found at 144 cm−1, 196 cm−1, 394 cm−1, 515 cm−1, 519 cm−1, and 636 cm−1 and confirmed that the surface-modified TiO2/Ti nanocomposite conformed to the crystal form of anatase [32], consistent with the diffraction results of the X-ray analysis in Figure 1. In addition to the Raman peaks of the anatase phase of TiO2, the Raman peak of MnO2 can be observed at 575 cm−1, which can be seen in the MnO2/TiO2/Ti curve. At 575 cm−1, the peak strength of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti curve was significantly increased compared with the 636 cm−1 Raman peak of the TiO2/Ti curve, which may contain both MnO2 and TiO2. This suggested that the substance in the MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite sample prepared by alternating immersion deposition was MnO2 particles.
The microstructures of the metallic porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites were elucidated by scanning electron microscopy. The results are shown in Figure 3. It can be clearly seen that the internal structure of the metal titanium foam was porous, its surface was uneven (Figure 3a), and there were micropores with irregular shapes and different sizes (Figure 3b). The microstructure of the TiO2/Ti prepared by the alkaline hydrothermal method is shown in Figure 3c,d. Here, H2Ti3O7 was annealed, and local chemical reactions and dehydration processes occurred to generate an anatase-type TiO2 [34]. The surface of the TiO2/Ti electrode material was more flattened than the surface of the foam titanium, and small TiO2 nanocrystals formed, which clustered to form a 3D nanowires network (Figure 3d), providing spaces for the subsequent loading of the MnO2 nano-coating. Moreover, the surface structure of the TiO2 was conducive to the transfer of ions in the redox Faraday reaction [35]. Often, different synthesis methods affect the forming structure of the material, and the growth mechanism of the crystals in the solution is actually quite complex and therefore not fully explained. With regard to the hydrothermal process, classical nucleation, orientation aggregation, and Ostwald ripening have been proposed [36,37]. Here, KMnO4 and MnSO4 were uniformly deposited on the TiO2/Ti formed by a co-proportionation reaction. With Ostwald maturation, MnO2 would be converted into small nanoparticles [38], and Figure 3e,f is consistent with the findings above. The uniformity of the ultra-thin manganese dioxide overlaid on the porous nanoelectrode enables the rapid transport of electrolyte ions and provides a continuous path for charge transfer [39]. The surface of the coating was uniform and compact, with a high load capacity. In summary, a nano-coating structure based on porous Ti provides good surface energy, which is conducive to the higher circulation performance of the electrode material.
The Tafel polarization curve is used to compare the relationship between the corrosion potential of the coating and the corrosion current density, which allows the corrosion resistance of the electrode material to be explored. Xavier et al. verified that the incorporation of MnO2 nanoparticles reduced the corrosion rate [40]. The presence of MnO2 nanoparticles helps to clog pores and cracks in the coating, hindering the initiation of corrosion at the coating/metal interface. The Tafel curves of the Ti, TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti electrodes are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1, and it can be seen that the corrosion current density (Icorr) of the surface-modified MnO2/TiO2/Ti electrode was significantly reduced compared with that of the Ti and TiO2/Ti electrodes. In the presence of MnO2, the self-corrosion potential (Ecorr) value shifted in the positive direction, which indicated that MnO2/TiO2/Ti significantly delayed the dissolution process of the electrode and improved its anti-corrosion performance [41]. This is consistent with the above conclusions.
To better understand the electrochemical properties of the electrode material, an electrochemical impedance analysis was performed. EIS measurements were made in the frequency range of 1 Hz–100 kHz, and the resulting Ti, TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti Nyquist curves and Bode plots are shown in Figure 5. The Nyquist diagram (Figure 5a) consisted of a low-frequency slash and a semicircular arc phase of a medium and high frequency, the semicircular arc of the high frequency region represented the charge transfer resistance, and the Z′ and Z″ at the interface of the electrolyte and electrode were the real and imaginary parts of the impedance, respectively. The results obtained by the Bode plots (Figure 5b) were consistent with the Nyquist diagram. The equivalent circuit diagram is shown in Figure 5 [41], where Rs is the solution resistance, Rct is the interfacial charge transfer resistor, where the size of the Rct depends on the electrode area that the electrolyte can access and the conductivity of the electrode, the smaller the Rct indicates the faster the electron transfer and ion diffusion, and CPE is the constant phase angle. The capacitance values for Ti, TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti were 1.556 F, 1.315 F, and 1.573 F, respectively, and the results showed that the capacitance values of MnO2/TiO2/Ti were significantly higher than those of both of the former. As can be seen from Table 2 and Figure 5, the Rs values (15.34 Ωcm2) of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti electrodes were smaller than those of surface-modified TiO2/Ti (64.99 Ωcm2) and Ti (98.02 Ωcm2) nanocomposites, while the charge transfer resistance (4.20 Ωcm2) of the MnO2/RGO electrodes was also much smaller than that of TiO2/Ti (37.94 Ωcm2) and porous Ti (92.11 Ωcm2). In the low-frequency range, the electrode reaction kinetics were mainly controlled by diffusion (Warburg) [42], and the slope of the Nyquist plot curve of the electrode was increasing, indicating rapid ion diffusion and good capacitor performance [43,44,45].
The electrochemical properties of the electrode material were further studied by performing CV tests. Figure 6 shows the test results of commercialized metal foam Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites in a KOH solution with an electrolyte system of 0.5 mol/L. The scanning potential was from −0.2 to 0.7 V, and the scanning speed was 10 mV/s. As shown in Figure 6a, all the CV curves in the voltage range had a symmetrical shape. Each of the three samples were analyzed by taking ten turns. Figure 6b presents the graph of the test results for one cycle of each sample, which showed that the MnO2/TiO2/Ti curve was shaped relative to a rectangle with a small redox peak with TiO2/Ti (Faraday reaction) [13], indicating the pseudo-capacitance behavior of the electrode. Compared with the TiO2/Ti nanocomposite, the MnO2/TiO2/Ti electrode exhibited a larger CV integration area, indicating that the MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites had a higher area capacitance, showing their superior electrochemical properties and the high capacitance behavior of MnO2.
The quality of the capacitance performance of the electrode material can be seen from the closed area of the curve. Titanium dioxide was intended to improve the manganese dioxide loading, although the presence of titanium dioxide did not contribute to the capacitance of the final electrode material; only the loaded manganese dioxide contributed to the capacitance. The area of the closed curve of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite, as shown in Figure 6b, changed greatly with the addition of MnO2, producing the largest closed curve. The specific capacitance (Cp) of the porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites can be estimated using Equation (1):
C p = A 2 mk ( V 2 V 1 )
where Cp is the specific capacitance (F/g), A is the CV curve area (V), m is the mass of the active substance (g), k is the scanning rate of the CV curve (V/s), and (V2 − V1) is the scanning potential range of the CV curve test. The histogram of the Ti, TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti specific capacitance values is shown in Figure 7, and the specific capacitance values of the above three samples were obtained according to the CV curve area of Figure 6b, which were 181.9F/g, 88.9F/g, and 314F/g, respectively. The specific capacitance value of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti composite electrode material was significantly higher than that of both of the former, which was 3.5 times larger than that of the TiO2/Ti electrode material. Therefore, loading MnO2 to the TiO2/Ti electrode material had better specific capacitance behavior than the TiO2/Ti and pure Ti electrode materials. The CV results showed that the MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposite resistance was small, and the capacitance performance was improved by the additional MnO2 nano-coating.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a compact MnO2/TiO2 coating on metallic porous Ti was prepared successfully through an alternating immersion method of a chemical precipitation reaction of KMnO4 and MnSO4 aqueous solutions. The morphologies of the coatings and chemical compositions were studied by XRD, Raman, and SEM. The electrochemical behavior of the MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites was studied via CV, Tafel curves, and EIS. The results revealed that the MnO2/TiO2/Ti exhibited better electrochemical properties and significantly improved the corrosion resistance than those of the pure porous Ti and the surface-modified Ti. In addition, the capacitance performance was improved strongly, and the specific capacitance value reached 314 F/g. MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites are therefore a promising composite electrode material for supercapacitor applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.; methodology, J.P. and Q.L.; software, X.W.; validation, X.W.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, J.P., Q.L. and X.D.; resources, S.C.; data curation, X.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; writing—review and editing, S.C.; visualization, L.S.; supervision, S.C.; project administration, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the 2018 Doctoral Research Funds of Shandong Jianzhu University (X18064Z), Joint Fund Project for Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021LLZ013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, G.; Zeng, M.; Peng, L.L.; Liu, X.M.; Bo, L.; Duan, J.H. China’s new energy development: Status, constraints and reforms. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 885–896. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y.; Dunn, B. Where Do Batteries End and Supercapacitors Begin. Science 2014, 6176, 1210–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jayalakshmi, M.; Balasubramanian, K. Simple Capacitors to Supercapacitors-An Overview. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2008, 3, 1196–1217. [Google Scholar]
  4. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaipannan, S.; Marappan, S. Fabrication of 9.6 V High-performance Asymmetric Supercapacitors Stack Based on Nickel Hexacyanoferrate-derived Ni(OH)2 Nanosheets and Bio-derived Activated Carbon. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, X. Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2520–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, G.P.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 797–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.G.; Kang, F.Y.; Wei, B.Q. Engineering of MnO2-based nanocomposites for high-performance supercapacitors. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 74, 51–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zou, C.J.; Li, Z.F.; Wang, C.X.; Hong, J.B.; Chen, J.; Zhong, S.W. Facile electrodeposition route for the fabrication of Ni/Ni(OH)2 nanocomposite films with different supporting electrolytes and their Electrochemical properties. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 793, 139471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bao, L.; Zang, J.; Li, X. Flexible Zn2SnO4/MnO2 core/shell nanocable-carbon microfiber hybrid composites for highperformance supercapacitor electrodes. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Toupin, M.; Brousse, T.; Belanger, D. Charge storage mechanism of MnO2 electrode used in aqueous electrochemical capacitor. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3184–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, X.H.; Yu, M.G.; Wang, G.M.; Zhai, T.; Xie, S.L.; Ling, Y.C.; Tong, Y.X.; Li, Y. H-TiO2@MnO2//H-TiO2@C Core–Shell Nanowires for High Performance and Flexible Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramadoss, A.; Kim, S.J. Hierarchically structured TiO2-MnO2 nanowall arrays as potential electrode material for high performance supercapacitors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 12201–12212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, X.; Li, Q.; Lv, Y.N.; Mao, Y.B. Three-dimensional ZnO@MnO2 core@shell nanostructures for electrochemical energy storage. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4456–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarkar, D.; Khan, G.G.; Singh, A.K.; Mandal, K. High-performance pseudocapacitor electrodes based on a-Fe2O3/MnO2 coreshell nanowire heterostructure arrays. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 15523–15531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, P.H.; Xiao, X.; Li, Y.Z.; Ding, Y.; Qiang, P.F.; Tan, X.H.; Mai, W.J.; Lin, Z.Y.; Wu, W.Z.; Li, T.Q.; et al. Hydrogenated ZnO Core—Shell Nanocables for Flexible Supercapacitors and Self-Powered Systems. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2617–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Y.G.; Zhang, X.H.; Chen, X.B.; Wang, H.Q.; Chen, J.R.; Zhong, X.X.; Li, Q.Y. Electrochemical properties of MnO2-deposited TiO2 nanotube arrays 3D composite electrode for supercapacitors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 14331–14337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ning, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Yang, Y. Outstanding supercapacitive properties of Mn-doped TiO2 micro/nanostructure porous film prepared by anodization method. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zheng, L.X.; Dong, Y.C.; Bian, H.D.; Lee, C.; Jian, L.; Li, Y.Y. Selfordered nanotubular TiO2 multilayers for high-performance photocatalysts and supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 203, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, L.; Lv, P.; Zhao, J. Preparation and properties of MnO2–TiO2 nanotube array composite electrodes using titanium foam as the current collector. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 23, 8859–8867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rajagopal, R.; Ryu, K.-S. Synthesis of Few Layered MnO2 Nanosheets Encapsulated TiO2 Nanorods Electrode for Supercapacitor Application. ECS Meet. Abstr. 2018, 1, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khan, S.U.M.; Al-Shahry, M.; Ingler, W.B. Efficient Photochemical Water Splitting by a Chemically Modified n-TiO2. Science 2002, 297, 2243–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hou, K.; Tian, B.Z.; Li, F.Y.; Bian, Z.Q.; Zhao, D.Y.; Huang, C.H. Highly crystallized mesoporous TiO2 films and their applications in dye sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 2414–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, S.Q.; Chen, A.C. Coadsorption of Horseradish Peroxidase with Thionine on TiO2 Nanotubes for Biosensing. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8409–8413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Toppglidis, E.; Cass, A.E.G.; Gilardi, G.; Sadeghi, S.; Beaumont, N.; Durrant, J.R. Protein Adsorption on Nanocrystalline TiO2 Films: An Immobilization Strategy for Bioanalytical Devices. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5111–5113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kaseem, M.; Choe, H.-C. Electrochemical and bioactive characteristics of the porous surface formed on Ti-xNb alloys via plasma electrolytic oxidation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 378, 125027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaseem, M.; Choe, H.-C. The effect of in-situ reactive incorporation of MoOx on the corrosion behavior of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy coated via micro-arc oxidation coating. Corros. Sci. 2021, 192, 109764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaseem, M.; Choe, H.-C. Simultaneous improvement of corrosion resistance and bioactivity of a titanium alloy via wet and dry plasma treatments. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 851, 156840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zehra, T.; Kaseem, M.; Hossain, S.; Ko, Y.-G. Fabrication of a protective hybrid coating composed of TiO2, MoO2, and SiO2 by plasma electrolytic oxidation of titanium. Metals 2021, 11, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Siwawongkasem, K.; Senanon, W.; Maensiri, S. Hydrothermal Synthesis, Characterization, and Electrochemical Properties of MnO2-Titanate Nanotubes (MnO2-TNTs). J. Electron. Mater. 2022, 51, 3188–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.M.; Du, G.J.; Liu, H.; Liu, D.; Qin, S.B.; Wang, N.; Hu, C.G.; Tao, X.T.; Jiao, J.; Wang, J.Y.; et al. Nanostructured Sheets of Ti―O Nanobelts for Gas Sensing and Antibacterial Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, S.J.; Wang, Q.B.; Liu, B.S.; Sang, Y.H.; Liu, H. Hierarchical TiO2 nanonetwork—Porous Ti 3D hybrid photocatalysts for continuous-flow photoelectrodegradation of organic pollutants. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Prasetio, A.; Habieb, A.; Alkian, I.; Arifin, Z.; Widiyandari, H. Dye-sensitized solar cell based on TiO2/MnO2 composite film as working electrode. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 877, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.M.; Liu, H. Preparation and Characterizations of Na2Ti3O7, H2Ti3O7 and TiO2 Nanobelts. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 306–307, 1233–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.X.; Kuang, M.; Hao, X.D.; Liu, Y.; Huang, M.; Guo, X.L.; Yan, J.; Han, G.Q.; Li, J. Rational Design of Hierarchically Porous Birnessite-Type Manganese Dioxides Nanosheets on Dif-ferent One-Dimensional Titania-Based Nanowires for High Per-formance Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2014, 270, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tang, G.G.; Sun, J.R.; Wei, C.; Wu, K.Q.; Ji, X.R.; Liu, S.S.; Tang, H.; Li, C.S. Synthesis and characterization of flowerlike MoS2 nanostructures through CTAB-assisted hydrothermal process. Mater. Lett. 2012, 86, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Y.D.D.; Li, X.L.L.; He, R.R.R.; Zhu, J.; Deng, Z.X.X. Artificial lamellar mesostructures to WS2 nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1411–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qu, Y.H.; Tong, X.; Yan, C.H.; Li, Y.Z.; Wang, Z.; Xu, S.H.; Xiong, D.Y.; Wang, L.W.; Chu, P.K. Hierarchical binder-free MnO2/TiO2 composite nanostructure on flexible seed graphite felt for high-performance supercapacitors. Vacuum 2020, 181, 109648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, J.G.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Z.H.; Kang, F. Coaxial Carbon Nanofibers/MnO2 Nanocomposites as Freestanding Electrodes for High-Performance Electrochemical Capacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 9240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xavier, J.R. Corrosion protection performance and interfacial interactions of polythiophene/silanes/MnO2 nanocomposite coatings on magnesium alloy in marine environment. Int. J. Polym. Anal. 2021, 26, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, T.; Zhang, F.F.; Xue, C.R.; Li, L.; Yin, Y.S. Structure stability and corrosion resistance of nano-TiO2 coatings on aluminum in seawater by a vacuum dip-coating method. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 2335–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, M.; Yang, D.Y.; Li, J.T. Supercapacitor performances of MnO2 and MnO2/ reduced graphene oxide prepared with various electrodeposition time. Vacuum 2020, 178, 109455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jin, Y.H.; Lin, Q.; Li, X.; Tavakoli, M.M.; Leung, S.; Tang, W.; Zhou, L.; Chan, H.L.W.; Fan, Z. Highly flexible and transferable supercapacitors with ordered three-dimensional MnO2/Au/MnO2 nanospike arrays. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 10199–10204. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stoller, M.D.; Park, S.J.; Zhu, Y.W.; An, J.H.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-Based Ultracapacitors. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3498–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Miller, J.R.; Outlaw, R.A.; Holloway, B.C. Graphene double-layer capacitor with ac line-filtering performance. Science 2010, 329, 1637–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of commercialized metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of commercialized metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites.
Coatings 12 01381 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectroscopy test results of commercialized metal porous Ti, surface−modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites.
Figure 2. Raman spectroscopy test results of commercialized metal porous Ti, surface−modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites.
Coatings 12 01381 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy images of different structures of metal porous Ti (a,b), TiO2/Ti (c,d), and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites (e,f).
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy images of different structures of metal porous Ti (a,b), TiO2/Ti (c,d), and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites (e,f).
Coatings 12 01381 g003
Figure 4. Tafel test results of metal porous Ti, surface−modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites.
Figure 4. Tafel test results of metal porous Ti, surface−modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites.
Coatings 12 01381 g004
Figure 5. (a) Nyquist diagram and (b) Bode plots of metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites and equivalent circuits.
Figure 5. (a) Nyquist diagram and (b) Bode plots of metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites and equivalent circuits.
Coatings 12 01381 g005
Figure 6. (a) Cyclic voltammetry of commercialized metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites. (b) Graph of the test results for one cycle.
Figure 6. (a) Cyclic voltammetry of commercialized metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nanocomposites. (b) Graph of the test results for one cycle.
Coatings 12 01381 g006
Figure 7. Histogram of specific capacitance values of metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nano composites.
Figure 7. Histogram of specific capacitance values of metal porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nano composites.
Coatings 12 01381 g007
Table 1. Results of the Tafel texts of the porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nano composites.
Table 1. Results of the Tafel texts of the porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nano composites.
SampleTafel Polarization
Icorr (uA)Ecorr (mV)Cathodic Tafel Slope (V/Decade)Anodic Tafel Slope (V/Decade)
Ti36.08−320−8.2213.019
TiO2/Ti23.93−260−9.6332.873
MnO2/TiO2/Ti 80.41−100−8.2243.091
Table 2. Results of the EIS fitting texts of the porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nano composites.
Table 2. Results of the EIS fitting texts of the porous Ti, surface-modified TiO2/Ti, and MnO2/TiO2/Ti nano composites.
SampleRs (Ωcm2)Rct (Ωcm2)CPE1-TCPE-PRct dl (Ωcm2)CPE2-TCPE2-P
Ti98.0292.112.7 × 10−30.453194.41.1 × 10−31.10
TiO2/Ti64.9937.943.0 × 10−40.580986.12.2 × 10−40.74
MnO2/TiO2/Ti15.344.203.17 × 10−50.853691.73.5 × 10−40.72
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Pan, J.; Li, Q.; Dong, X.; Shi, L.; Chang, S. Preparation, Corrosion Resistance, and Electrochemical Properties of MnO2/TiO2 Coating on Porous Titanium. Coatings 2022, 12, 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101381

AMA Style

Wang X, Pan J, Li Q, Dong X, Shi L, Chang S. Preparation, Corrosion Resistance, and Electrochemical Properties of MnO2/TiO2 Coating on Porous Titanium. Coatings. 2022; 12(10):1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaomin, Jing Pan, Qing Li, Xiaojun Dong, Lei Shi, and Sujie Chang. 2022. "Preparation, Corrosion Resistance, and Electrochemical Properties of MnO2/TiO2 Coating on Porous Titanium" Coatings 12, no. 10: 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop