Next Article in Journal
Influence of Rust Inhibitor on the Corrosion Resistance of Reinforcement in Cement Paste with Chloride
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultrasonic Technique for Production of Nanoemulsions for Food Packaging Purposes: A Review Study
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical Properties and Biological Activity of Active Films Based on Corn Peptide Incorporated Carboxymethyl Chitosan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quality Characteristics of Semi-Moist Apricot-Cornflakes: Effect of Different Composite Coating Application and Storage Time
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/coatings11050605
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Active Biopolymeric Films Inoculated with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, a Predatory Bacterium

by
Christian Mariel Sáenz-Santos
1,
Omotayo Opemipo Oyedara
2,
Yunia Verónica García-Tejeda
3,*,
Claudia A. Romero-Bastida
4,
Esperanza Milagros García-Oropesa
5,
Eduardo Villalobo
6 and
Mario A. Rodríguez-Pérez
1,*
1
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CBG, Blvd. del Maestro esquina Elías Piña, Col. Narciso Mendoza, Reynosa 88710, Mexico
2
Department of Microbiology, Osun State University, Osogbo Campus, Osogbo P.M.B. 4494, Nigeria
3
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, UPIITA, Academia de Ciencias Básicas, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional No. 2580, Col. Barrio la Laguna Ticomán, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico City 07340, Mexico
4
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CEPROBI, Carretera Yautepec Jojutla, Km. 6, Calle CeProBi No. 8, Col. San Isidro, Yautepec 62731, Mexico
5
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria, Reynosa Aztlán, Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Mariano Matamoros S/N, Zona Centro, Victoria 87000, Mexico
6
Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. de la Reina Mercedes, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(5), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050605
Submission received: 4 April 2021 / Revised: 12 May 2021 / Accepted: 14 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Use of Edible Thin Films/Coatings in Food Industries)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of the present work was to evaluate novel active films made with biopolymeric matrices as carriers of a living Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 strain, a predatory bacterium with antimicrobial potentials against pathogens. Biopolymer films were prepared by a casting method using the following mixtures: collagen/sodium alginate/sorbitol (CA-S), collagen/sodium alginate/glycerol (CA-G), and tapioca starch/sodium alginate/glycerol (StA-G). The effects of the film formulations on the viability of the B. bacteriovorus was investigated by using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). SEM showed that Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus morphology was not altered in the polymeric films. FTIR spectroscopy provided information about the structural composition of the films. CA-S showed less reduction in the viability of B. bacteriovorus after its entrapment; thus, CA-S proved to be a better agent for the immobilization and preservation of B. bacteriovorus to enhance its predatory activities during application against Escherichia coli.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, active packagings for increasing the shelf life of foods has attracted much attention in the field of food preservation due to increased demand for foods that are free of synthetic preservatives [1,2]. Biological control of bacterial pathogens using Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus (B. bacteriovorus) and other bacteria [3] is a new alternative to preservatives, considering that synthetic chemical preservatives and additives should be avoided because many of these could cause health damage [4].
B. bacteriovorus is a deltaproteobacterium that preys especially upon other Gram-negative bacteria. B. bacteriovorus invade the periplasm of their prey, forming a structure called a bdelloplast [5]. Within the bdelloplast, B. bacteriovorus grows, multiplies, and finally lyses its prey, releasing progenies that can continue the attack [6]. As a prokaryotic predator, B. bacteriovorus has the potential to serve as an agent for the biocontrol of bacterial pathogens. Additionally, it is safe for humans as a therapeutic agent and found in abundance in healthy human beings [7,8]; however, for the effective use of B. bacteriovorus as a biocontrol agent in food packaging, it is paramount to keep it viable and stable.
The selection and development of a suitable encapsulating agent are important for the viability of B. bacteriovorus. Moreover, encapsulating agents of natural polymer origin can serve as adjuvants for the protection and stability of B. bacteriovorus when applied to control pathogens during food storage. The sources of natural polymers used for edible packaging films include gums (e.g., arabic, xanthan, gellan, and curdlan), plants (e.g., starch, cellulose, pectin, and gum acacia), animals (e.g., whey protein, collagen, keratin, and gelatin), algae (e.g., alginate and carrageenan), and fungi (e.g., chitin, pullulan, and scleroglucan).
In this study, the viability of B. bacteriovorus was tested in three of the natural polymers, and these include collagen, alginate, and starch. Collagen is a long and fibrous protein, which constitutes approximately 30% of the body’s total protein mass in mammals. Collagen fibrils are present in tendons, skin, bones, cornea, ligaments, muscle, and dentin [9]. Various authors have reported collagen films derived from various sources, including bovine [10], cow [11], and fish skins [12]. Furthermore, collagen films have wide applications because of their good flexibility and strong mechanical properties due to the self-aggregation and crosslinking of collagen fibrils [10]. Sodium alginate is a natural polysaccharide derived from brown algae, which when combined with collagen, forms films with suitable mechanical and barrier properties [13]. Sodium alginate has application in food packaging industries. Starch is a natural polymer of plant origin that has found its application in the food industries. For instance, L. acidophilus has been successfully encapsulated in cassava starch edible films [14]. In anticipation of finding alternative preservation methods to combat the proliferation of food spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, B. bacteriovorus, a predatory bacterium, has been recently considered as a biocontrol agent.
To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report on the use of biopolymeric films for immobilization of B. bacteriovorus. This work is focused on the production of active biopolymeric films, and the paper is aimed at: (1) trapping the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain using the following mixtures: collagen/sodium alginate/sorbitol (CA-S), collagen/sodium alginate/glycerol (CA-G), and tapioca starch/sodium alginate/glycerol (StA-G); (2) determining the entrapment yield of the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain in these formulations; and (3) characterizing the mechanical and thermal properties of biopolymeric films.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biopolymers, Media, and Bacterial Strains

Sodium alginate and hydrolysed collagen were acquired from D’xilou (Mexico city, Mexico). Tapioca starch was acquired from Bob’s Red Mill Natural Foods (Milwaukie, OR, USA).Sorbitol, glycerol and all media were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich® (St. Louis, MO, USA). Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 strain and Escherichia coli DH5 α were provided by the CBG-IPN (Reynosa Tamps, Mexico).

2.2. Inoculum Preparation

The host bacteria, E. coli DH5 α , was cultured in 40 mL of LB broth at 37 ° C under agitation for the duration of a night. After that, the E. coli culture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm and the pellet was washed with 10 mL of HEPES buffer containing 3 mmol/L of CaCl 2 ·2H 2 O and 2 mmol/L of MgCl 2 ·6H 2 O (pH 7.4). The predatory bacteria of the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain were cultured in the presence of the host bacteria on DNB agar using the double agar overlay method [15]. After that, a lytic plaque was obtained and purified by repeating the double agar overlay method.
The purified plaque was inoculated with 50 mL of E. coli contained in HEPES buffer and after predatory activity, 40 mL of the cleared lysate were filtered (MF-Millipore™ of 0.45 m) in order to purify B. bacteriovorus. Purified B. bacteriovorus cells in co-culture with washed E. coli cells were incubated at 30 ° C under agitation for 7 d. B. bacteriovorus was purified again, and was concentrated by centrifugation (15,700 rpm) and washed twice with 50 mL of phosphate-buffered saline. The resulting concentration contained 1 × 10 8 PFU/mL of B. bacteriovorus cells, which were used to inoculate biopolymeric films.

2.3. B. bacteriovorus Entrapment in Biopolymeric Films

Inoculation of B. bacteriovorus in the films was carried out by the casting method; three different biopolymeric films were prepared. Biopolymeric films were prepared by the casting method using two plasticizers and combined polymers: a collagen-sodium alginate film plasticized with sorbitol (CA-S), a collagen-sodium alginate film plasticized with glycerol (CA-G), and a tapioca starch–sodium alginate film plasticized with glycerol (StA-G).
For CA-S, 25 g of hydrolyzed collagen, 2.5 g of sodium alginate, 17.5 g of sorbitol, and 230 mL of distilled water were used. For CA-G, 25 g of hydrolyzed collagen, 2.5 g of sodium alginate, 10 g of glycerol as a plasticizer, and 230 mL of tap water were used. For StA-G, 8.75 g of tapioca starch, 3.75 g sodium alginate, 10 g of glycerol as a plasticizer and 230 mL of distilled water were used. The amounts chosen for starch formulation were based on the results reported in [13].
All of the prepared mixtures were homogenized by mechanical stirring at 110 ° C for 20 min and later sterilized in an autoclave for 15 min at 121 ° C. The films were obtained by casting the suspension into Teflon moulds (11 × 21.5 cm 2 ). The filmogenic solution (10 mL) at 40 ° C was poured into a Teflon mold, and subsequently a concentrated pellet of the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain (1 × 10 8 PFU/mL) was added to the solution. The film was dried out in a ventilated oven at 37 ° C overnight. The thin biofilms were removed from the molds and stored in desiccators until their use.

2.3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Bacteria trapped within the polymeric matrices were observed in a Dual-Beam SEM FEI Nova 200 (Nova NanoLab™, Tustin, CA, USA), using a low acceleration voltage of 3–5 kV and a chamber pressure of 0.60 mbar. The active biopolymeric films were fixed on aluminum stubs with double-faced adhesive tape. Magnifications at 1500×, 5000×, and 10,000× were obtained by image analysis.

2.3.2. Evaluation of the Entrapment Yield of B. bacteriovorus in the Biopolymeric Films

The viability of the predatory bacteria was quantified after drying the films by measuring the number of plaque-forming units produced. Dry films loaded with B. bacteriovorus HD100 were rehydrated in 5 mL of sterile distilled water for 10 min and were serially diluted ten-fold. The diluted film solution was cultured on dilute nutrient broth agar medium (DNB) using the double-layered agar plating technique and E. coli DH5 α as prey. The number of plaques that developed after 72 h from the rehydrated filmogenic solution was recorded and expressed in PFU/mL. The entrapment yield (EY) of biopolymeric films was calculated as follows:
E Y ( % ) = N N 0 × 100 ,
where N 0 is the inoculum concentration in PFU/g of the film and N (PFU/g) is the viable cells’ concentration extracted from the films after employing the casting method. The total count of the viable cells was analyzed in triplicate. The statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.01) by using SigmaPlot 14.5 software (SYSTAT, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.3.3. Lytic Activity of B. bacteriovorus HD100 against E. coli DH5 α in Co-Culture Assay

The predatory activity of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 to reduce the concentration of Escherichia coli DH5 α in the co-culture was assessed after 24 and 48 h. The reduction of E. coli was determinate by CFU/mL count as follows: serial dilutions (10 2 to 10 9 ) were prepared from one milliliter aliquot collected from the co-culture (Section 2.2) after 24 and 48 h. Subsequently, 100 L of each dilution were spread-plated onto LB agar to determine the CFU/mL of the respective prey cell cultures. In addition, the double-layered agar plating technique was used to count the PFU/mL of B. bacteriovorus HD100. The measurements were performed in triplicate.
Lytic activity of predatory bacteria was observed in the form of clear areas in plaques containing a lawn of prey cells; photographs were captured by using a smartphone camera.

2.4. Physicochemical Properties of Biofilms

2.4.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Molecular interactions in biopolymeric films were studied by FTIR spectroscopy using a Jobin-Yvon LabRam HR800 spectrometer (HORIBA Scientific, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The individual polymers and biofilms were analyzed over the range of 4000–4500 cm − 1 , with 4 cm − 1 of spectral resolution and 40 scans per sample, using an attenuated total reflectance objective.

2.4.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis of the Biopolymeric Films

The XRD analysis of biopolymeric films was determined on a Rigaku Miniflex 600 diffractometer (Rigaku®, Tokyo, Japan). The instrument was operated at 40 kV and 15 mA with CuK α radiation ( λ = 1.54 Å) in 2 θ sweeping from 0 ° to 60 ° with a step size of 0.01 and 0.03 ° /min. The degree of crystallinity (% Cr) was determined according to the method described in [16]. OriginPro 10 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used to analyze the spectrum.

2.4.3. Thermal Analysis by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

The melting temperature ( T p ), the melting enthalpy ( Δ H) in J/g, and the glass transition ( T g ) temperature of casting films, as well as the T g and Δ C p of film-forming polymers, were determined using a Discovery DSC calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) calibrated with indium [17]. Samples of approximately 2.1 mg were weighed into Tzero® Hermetic Aluminum pans, and after that the samples were subjected to a cooling program from 25 to −75 ° C and to a heating program from −75 to 170 ° C (10 ° C/min). The analysis was performed in triplicate using the software TRIOS 5.1.1 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA).

2.4.4. Mechanical Analysis of the Biopolymeric Films

The biopolymeric films were stored in a desiccator at 57% relative humidity for 72 h before analysis. Subsequently, the samples were cut at dimensions of 100 × 10 mm (ASTM D882-02 method). The tensile strength (MPa), the elongation at break (%), and the Young’s modulus (Mpa) were determined using a TA.TX2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) following the methodology of a previous work [18]. The analysis was performed by tenfold.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Molecular Interactions

Figure 1 shows FTIR spectra of the individual polymers. Tapioca starch exhibited absorption band characteristics at the band of 3692–3000 cm − 1 , where the maximum absorption was found at 3300 cm − 1 ; this band is associated with the tensile stress of the vibrational free bonds of inter- and intramolecular hydroxyl groups of the anhydroglucose units. The peaks observed at 2923, 1411, and 1350 cm − 1 are attributed to CH stretching vibrations and bending between methylene groups [19]. The peak at 1635 cm − 1 is associated with the bending vibration of H 2 O and H–O–H, which presumably originates from tightly bound water present in the starch granules [20,21]. Three characteristic peaks of –C–O– stretching were observed in the fingerprint region of the starch spectrum. The peak at 1152 cm − 1 is associated with the C–O bond stretching of the C–O–H groups, and the peaks at 1080 and 1027 cm − 1 are attributed to covalent bond stretching of the C–O–C group in the anhydroglucose ring [22].
In the case of the sodium alginate spectrum, the band located between 3692 and 2974 cm − 1 was associated with the –O–H and C–H aliphatic chain stretching vibrations, respectively [23]. The signal observed at 1597 cm − 1 corresponds to the asymmetric stretching vibration of the carbonyl bond –C=O, while that peaks of 1411 and 1025 cm − 1 are attributed to carboxyl stretching (–COO and –C–O).
The observed spectrum for collagen is similar to that reported for buffalo skin [24]. The band located between 3684 and 3113 cm − 1 is attributed to the N–H stretching vibration of Amide A, 1635 cm − 1 (primary amide), which is associated with stretching vibrations of carbonyl groups (C=O bond) along the polypeptide backbone, and the 1529 cm − 1 (secondary amide) signal results from N–H bending vibration, coupled with the stretching vibration of C–N. The signal at 1243 cm − 1 (tertiary amide) is associated with C–N stretching, and the NH peak is related with the triple helix structure of collagen.
Figure 2 depicts the spectra of the CA-S, CA-G, and StA-G biopolymeric films. The FTIR spectra show that the CA-S and CA-G films showed similar patterns, except for a peak observed at 1078 cm − 1 in the sorbitol plasticized film (CA-S). This new band at 1078 cm − 1 (see arrow in Figure 2) is attributed to C–O–H bending from interactions between sorbitol and polymers.
Concerning the StA-G film, spectra showed bands corresponding to starch, sodium alginate, and glycerol; a strong signal was observed at 1025 cm − 1 assigned to –C–O groups (Figure 2). This suggests that hydroxyl and carboxylate groups from sodium alginate and tapioca starch form a very strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding with glycerol. In the spectra of sodium alginate, the bands at 1597 and 1411 cm − 1 were displaced to 1610 and 1413 cm − 1 , respectively. The observed change at a higher wave number value shows a reduction in bond strength and stretch frequency. The band associated with stretching vibrations (3692 and 2974 cm − 1 ) of sodium alginate was reduced in the StA-G sample (3671 and 2997 cm − 1 ). The observed changes suggest intermolecular attraction through the formation of hydrogen bonds between groups in sodium alginate (–COO − ) and groups in tapioca starch (–OH).

3.2. Thermal Analysis by DSC

The thermal analysis plays an important role in determining the thermal stability and mechanical performance of films. Figure 3 shows the T g of the biopolymeric films manufactured by the casting process, and Figure 4 shows the T g of film-forming polymers. The CA-S film showed a T g = −24.94 ° C ± 1.19 with a Δ C p = 0.88 ± 0.05 J/(g· ° C), and T g = 40.84 ± 0.48 ° C with a Δ C p = 0.16 ± 0.01 J/(g· ° C). The CA-G film showed a T g = −21.83 ± 1.08 ° C with a Δ C p = 0.19 ± 0.03 J/(g· ° C), and a T g = 33.70 ± 1.60 with a Δ C p = 0.13 ± 0.03 J/(g· ° C). The high degree of crosslinking between hydrolyzed collagen and sodium alginate in the CA-S and CA-G films, together with the plasticizer during film formation showed a decrease in the first T g with respect to the T g of collagen anhydrous (82.51 ± 0.21 ° C), and a second T g allied to the T g of sodium alginate anhydrous (41.85 ± 1.47 ° C). Sodium alginate presented the following melting parameters: T 0 = 145.75 ± 0.01, T p = 145.84 ± 0.07, T c = 152.67 ± 0.4 ° C, and Δ H = 7.09 J/g ± 0.14, which are lower than those obtained for the CA-S and CA-G films, except for enthalpy of fusion. These results show a greater thermal stability of the films containing both polymers than sodium alginate itself. In a previous work [10], it was reported that the addition of sodium alginate to collagen films increased the polymeric interactions in the films. Regarding the CA-S and CA-G films (see zoomed plot in Figure 3), remarkable differences in thermal properties were observed with the type of plasticizer used; the CA-G film melted at a higher temperature than CA-S, and CA-S showed the highest melting enthalpy.
In the StA-G sample, the T g could not be detected during the DSC experiment (see Figure 3). Sodium alginate is a polysaccharide polymer, which contains two hydroxyl (OH–) segments and one carboxylate (–COO − ) segment in every repeating unit, and each anhydroglucose unit in starch contains three hydroxyl groups. The tapioca starch sample showed a T g = 53.65 ± 8.3 ° C (see Figure 4); the starch was completely gelatinized and the enthalpy of fusion of the film was very small at 150 ° C. Due to the dynamic range of the DSC we could not observe transitions greater than 160 ° C; it has been reported [21] that incorporation of starch into sodium alginate films led to melting temperatures in the range of 219–226 ° C.

3.3. XRD Analysis

The diffractogram patterns for each biofilm formulation and relative crystallinity are shown in Figure 5. X-ray diffraction patterns of biopolymeric films showed absorption peaks and an amorphous zone. The collagen-alginate films (CA-S, CA-G) showed a higher intensity in XRD peaks at 2 θ = 21 ° and 2 θ = 40 ° than the starch-alginate-film (StA-G). The diffraction peak at 2 θ = 21 ° is related to structural layers of collagen fibrils [25], and the broad peak at 2 θ = 40 ° is attributed to sodium alginate [26]. The type of plasticizer lightly affected the XRD pattern of the biofilms; the biofilm plasticized with glycerol showed an additional shoulder at 2 θ = 31 ° , indicating enhancement of the film’s crystalline structure. Films plasticized with glycerol showed higher C r than those plasticized with sorbitol.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

The results regarding the mechanical properties of the prepared biofilms are shown in Table 1. T S represents the maximum strength of a film against applied tensile stress, E represents the ability of a biofilm to stretch, and Y M indicates the rigidity of a film [27]. It should be noted that the starch–sodium alginate biofilm plasticized with sorbitol was not analyzed in this study because the biofilm was brittle, thus inhibiting the analysis. The T S of the collagen-alginate biofilms was highest in the CA-S film plasticized with sorbitol (4.78 MPa) and lowest in CA-G film (0.96 MPa). This could be due to the higher enthalpy needed to break the interaction formed between polymer–sorbitol (5.446 J/g) than polymer–glycerol (4.6569 J/g).
It was observed that the use of sorbitol in the CA-S film resulted in a stronger network structure than when glycerol was used in CA-G; these results agree with those obtained in FTIR (see Section 2). Similarly, Elango et al. [28], showed that catfish collagen–sorbitol casting films had a higher T S (4.8 MPa) than those obtained for catfish collagen-pglycerol casting films ( T S : 4.1 MPa). In a recent work [29], it was shown that sodium alginate can improve the mechanical properties of collagen, which tends to become brittle during storage. This research showed that sodium alginate strengthens the collagen film structure, and therefore we decided to use the sodium alginate–collagen mixture in this research. Comparatively, the performance of protein films against polysaccharide films using glycerol indicated that polysaccharide films (StA-G) have a higher T S than films containing protein (CA-G). These results agree with those of Wang et al. (2017) [13].
StA-G films showed the highest E (83%) followed by CA-G glycerol (E: 73%) and CA-S (E: 41%). The compatibility of glycerol with starch through hydrogen bonding reduced the intramolecular attractions between starch chains, thereby promoting the mobility of the polymer chains in the StA-G film. Although StA-G presented the best E, its performance was less than the T S (10 MPa) reported for polyethylene films [30,31]; for this reason a coating with kraft paper [32] is suggested to improve the mechanical properties of the films for its application as packaging material. The E of CA-S was lower than the value obtained for StA-G; however, its therapeutic characteristics suggest that CA-S may have biomedical applications, since collagen and sodium alginate have been widely studied for tissue regeneration [33,34,35].

3.5. Visualization of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 Strain by SEM

The micrographs observed by SEM depict the integrity of B. bacteriovorus after its entrapment in biofilms. Figure 6 shows the rod-shaped B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain completely embedded in the film matrix, a single bacteria (Figure 6e), and a clump of bacterial cells that is enclosed in a red circle (Figure 6f). The size of the B. bacteriovorus HD 100 strain observed by SEM was approximately 1 m in length, similar to the value of 0.8 m observed for the B. bacteriovorus 109J strain [36]. A cross section of the CA-S film is shown in Figure 6b, where specimens with unaltered morphology were observed. In the micrographs, smoother surfaces were observed in StA-G than in CA-G and CA-S, indicating the higher homogeneity of the StA-G films. Contrarily, CA-S and CA-G showed some bumps in their surface (Figure 6d). These bumps could be attributed to undenatured collagen fibrils, which are between approximately 0.5 and 1 m in length. A study [37] has shown that collagen fibril diameters are between 0.1 and 0.3 m.

3.6. Viability of B. bacteriovorus HD100 in the Biofilms

Table 1 shows the cell density of B. bacteriovorus HD100 assessed by the number of plaques formed at 72 h in the plaque, and its E Y in biopolymeric films. The PFUs produced by B. bacteriovorus cells extracted from the films are shown in Figure 7. The growing inhibition zone is due to the movement of the predator within the soft top agar; this is a prominent feature of predatory bacteria [38]. In the present work, all double layer agar plates exhibited an inhibitory effect against Escherichia coli DH5 α (Figure 7).
A significant variation (p < 0.01) in the viability of B. bacteriovorus HD100 was observed in all treatments; CA-S was more effective than CA-G and StA-G in maintaining the viability of the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain. Therefore, the highest E Y of 93.46% resulted for the film plasticized with sorbitol (CA-S). This result agrees with the work of Dashiff and Kadouri [39], who showed that high concentrations of glycerol can inhibit the viability of the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain and predation of the oral pathogens Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Eikenella corrodens. In a similar study, Bdellovibrio sp. strain F16 was encapsulated in gelatin microparticles by spray drying [40]. The cell density obtained in the present work for the CA-S film (see Table 1) was higher than the cell density (5.4 × 10 7 PFU/g) reported for B. bacteriovorus microcapsules [40] produced by spray drying at 140 ° C (inlet temperature). In the aforementioned study, no encapsulation yield was reported for B. bacteriovorus.
The concentration of E. coli bacterial cells (CFU/mL) obtained after 48 h upon exposure to the predator in HEPES buffer is shown in Figure 8. A decrease in cell concentration was observed compared to the initial inoculum (p < 0.05), and after 48 h the concentration of E. coli decreased by 1.42 logs. The results presented in this test confirm that active films have potential application in food preservation in forthcoming work.

4. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this was the first time in which B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain was trapped into three different biopolymeric films by a casting process. The best suitable biopolymer formulation for the entrapment of the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain was CA-S, which protected and enhanced the survival of B. bacteriovorus HD100 compared to CA-G and StA-G.
The CA-S film showed the highest TS, as was supported by FTIR analysis. It showed new chemical interactions between sorbitol and biopolymers. Moreover, the CA-S film had the highest TS, and required the highest melting enthalpy.
B. bacteriovorus showed effective predatory activity against Escherichia coli DH5 α ; thus, biopolymeric films containing the B. bacteriovorus HD100 strain can be used as biocontrol agents against pathogens in packaging materials to increase the shelf life of food products, for instance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.R.-P. and Y.V.G.-T.; Formal analysis, M.A.R.-P., E.V. and Y.V.G.-T.; Investigation, M.A.R.-P., C.M.S.-S., Y.V.G.-T. and O.O.O.; Methodology, C.M.S.-S., E.V., O.O.O., C.A.R.-B. and Y.V.G.-T.; Resources, M.A.R.-P., E.M.G.-O., Y.V.G.-T. and E.V.; Software, Y.V.G.-T. and C.A.R.-B.; Supervision, M.A.R.-P., E.M.G.-O. and E.V.; Validation, M.A.R.-P., E.M.G.-O., O.O.O., E.V., Y.V.G.-T. and C.A.R.-B.; Writing—original draft, C.M.S.-S., M.A.R.-P., O.O.O., and Y.V.G.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by SIP project 20211607 (Y.V.G.-T.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the experimental support of the CNMN-IPN in the realization of the present work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CA-Scollagen-sodium alginate film plasticized with sorbitol
CA-Gcollagen-sodium alginate film plasticized with glycerol
StA-Gtapioca starch–sodium alginate film plasticized with glycerol
E Y entrapment yield

References

  1. Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Chitosan Based Nanocomposite Films and Coatings: Emerging Antimicrobial Food Packaging Alternatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, C.; Pei, J.; Xiong, X.; Xue, F. Encapsulation of Grapefruit Essential Oil in Emulsion-Based Edible Film Prepared by Plum (Pruni Domesticae Semen) Seed Protein Isolate and Gum Acacia Conjugates. Coatings 2020, 10, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morales, P.; Aguirre, J.; Troncoso, M.; Figueroa, G. Comparison of in Vitro and in Situ Antagonism Assays as Tools for the Selection of Bio-Preservative Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) in Poultry Meat. LWT 2020, 118, 108846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shaikh, S.M.; Doijad, R.C.; Shete, A.S.; Sankpal, P.S. A Review on: Preservatives used in Pharmaceuticals and impacts on Health. Pharma Tutor 2016, 4, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomashow, M.F.; Cotter, T.W. Bdellovibrio Host Dependence: The Search for Signal Molecules and Genes that Regulate the Intraperiplasmic Growth Cycle. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Engelking, H.M.; Seidler, R.J. The Involvement of Extracellular Enzymes in the Metabolism ofBdellovibrio. Arch. Microbiol. 1974, 95, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Iebba, V.; Santangelo, F.; Totino, V.; Nicoletti, M.; Gagliardi, A.; De Biase, R.V. Higher Prevalence and Abundance of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus in the Human Gut of Healthy Subjects. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonfiglio, G.; Neroni, B.; Radocchia, G.; Marazzato, M.; Pantanella, F.; Schippa, S. Insight into the Possible Use of the Predator Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus as a Probiotic. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hong, H.; Fan, H.; Chalamaiah, M.; Wu, J. Preparation of Low-Molecular-Weight, Collagen Hydrolysates (Peptides): Current Progress, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shi, D.; Liu, F.; Yu, Z.; Chang, B.; Goff, H.D.; Zhong, F. Effect of Aging Treatment on the Physicochemical Properties of Collagen Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, X.; Zhou, L.; Xu, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Shinoda, M.; Tada, I.; Minami, S.; Urayama, K.; Yamane, H. The Structure and Properties of Natural Sheep Casing and Artificial Films Prepared from Natural Collagen with various Crosslinking Treatments. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhuimbar, M.V.; Bhagwat, P.K.; Dandge, P.B. Extraction and Characterization of Acid Soluble Collagen from Fish Waste: Development of Collagen-Chitosan Blend as Food Packaging Film. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Z.; Hu, S.; Wang, H. Scale-Up Preparation and Characterization of Collagen/Sodium Alginate Blend Films. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 4954259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Santacruz, S.; Castro, M. Viability of Free and Encapsulated Lactobacillus Acidophilus Incorporated to Cassava Starch Edible Films and its Application to Manaba Fresh White Cheese. LWT 2018, 93, 570–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oyedara, O.O.; De Luna-Santillana, E.J.; Olguin-Rodriguez, O.; Guo, X.; Mendoza-Villa, M.; Menchaca-Arredondo, J.; Elufisan, T.O.; Garza-Hernandez, J.; Garcia Leon, I.; Rodriguez-Perez, M. Isolation of Bdellovibrio Sp. from Soil Samples in Mexico and their Potential Applications in Control of Pathogens. Microbiologyopen 2016, 5, 992–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Dong, H.; Hou, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, H. Relationships between some Physicochemical Properties of Starches from Maize Cultivars Grown in East China. Starch-Stärke 2008, 60, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. García-Tejeda, Y.V.; Leal-Castañeda, E.J.; Espinosa-Solis, V.; Barrera-Figueroa, V. Synthesis and Characterization of Rice Starch Laurate as Food-Grade Emulsifier for Canola Oil-in-Water Emulsions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 194, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Romero-Bastida, C.A.; Bello-Pérez, L.A.; Velazquez, G.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J. Effect of the Addition Order and Amylose Content on Mechanical, Barrier and Structural Properties of Films made with Starch and Montmorillonite. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 127, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. García-Tejeda, Y.V.; Salinas-Moreno, Y.; Hernández-Martínez, Á.R.; Martínez-Bustos, F. Encapsulation of Purple Maize Anthocyanins in Phosphorylated Starch by Spray Drying. Cereal Chem. 2016, 93, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fazaeli, M.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Kalbasi Ashtari, A.; Omid, M. Effect of Spray Drying Conditions and Feed Composition on the Physical Properties of Black Mulberry Juice Powder. Food Bioprod. Process. 2012, 90, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siddaramaiah; Swamy, T.M.M.; Ramaraj, B.; Lee, J.H. Sodium Alginate and its Blends with Starch: Thermal and Morphological Properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 4075–4081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Wang, Y. Structures and Physicochemical Properties of Acid-Thinned Corn, Potato and Rice Starches. Starch-Stärke 2001, 53, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pereira, R.; Tojeira, A.; Vaz, D.C.; Mendes, A.; Bártolo, P. Preparation and characterization of films based on alginate and aloe vera. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2011, 16, 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rizk, M.A.; Mostafa, N.Y. Extraction and Characterization of Collagen from Buffalo Skin for Biomedical Applications. Orient. J. Chem. 2016, 32, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liao, W.; Guanghua, X.; Li, Y.; Shen, X.R.; Li, C. Comparison of Characteristics and Fibril-Forming Ability of Skin Collagen from Barramundi (Lates Calcarifer) and Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdel Aziz, M.S.; Salama, H.E.; Sabaa, M.W. Biobased alginate/castor Oil Edible Films for Active Food Packaging. LWT 2018, 96, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Dai, Y.; Dong, H.; Hou, H. Effects of Hydrophobic Agents on the Physicochemical Properties of Edible agar/maltodextrin Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elango, J.; Bu, Y.; Bin, B.; Geevaretnam, J.; Robinson, J.S.; Wu, W. Effect of Chemical and Biological Cross-Linkers on Mechanical and Functional Properties of Shark Catfish Skin Collagen Films. Food Biosci. 2017, 17, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, Z.; He, M.; Zhai, Y.; Xin, F.; Yu, S.; Zhao, H.; Xiao, H.; Song, Y. Preparation of Collagen Casings with High Mechanical Properties using Response Surface Methodology. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Otàlora Gonzàlez, C.M.; Flores, S.K.; Basanta, M.F.; Gerschenson, L.N. Effect of Beetroot (Beta Vulgaris L. Var Conditiva) Fiber Filler and Corona Treatment on Cassava Starch Films Properties. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Markovicová, L.; Zatkalíková, V.; Kojnoková, T.; Gana, D.; Liptáková, T. The physical - mechanical properties of low-density polyethylene films. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 726, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nurul Syahida, S.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R.; Ainun, Z.M.A.; Nur Hanani, Z.A. Effects of gelatin/palm wax/lemongrass Essential Oil (GPL)-Coated Kraft Paper on the Quality and Shelf Life of Ground Beef Stored at 4 ∘C. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 28, 100640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, H.; Peng, M.; Cheng, T.; Zhao, P.; Qiu, L.; Zhou, J.; Lu, G.; Chen, J. Silver Nanoparticles-Doped collagen–alginate Antimicrobial Biocomposite as Potential Wound Dressing. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 14944–14952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zarate-Triviño, D.G.; Pool, H.; Vergara-Castañeda, H.; Elizalde-Peña, E.A.; Vallejo-Becerra, V.; Villaseñor, F.; Prokhorov, E.; Gough, J.; Garcia-Gaitan, B.; Luna-Barcenas, G. (Chitosan-g-Glycidyl Methacrylate)-Collagen II Scaffold for Cartilage Regeneration. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2020, 69, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, H.; Ahn, S.; Kim, G.H. Three-Dimensional Collagen/Alginate Hybrid Scaffolds Functionalized with a Drug Delivery System (DDS) for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Núñez, M.E.; Martin, M.O.; Duong, L.K.; Ly, E.; Spain, E.M. Investigations into the Life Cycle of the Bacterial Predator Bdellovibrio Bacteriovorus 109J at an Interface by Atomic Force Microscopy. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 3379–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Siadat, S.M.; Silverman, A.A.; DiMarzio, C.A.; Ruberti, J.W. Measuring Collagen Fibril Diameter with Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2021, 213, 107697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stolp, H.; Starr, M.P. Bdellovibrio Bacteriovorus Gen. Et Sp. n., a Predatory, Ectoparasitic, and Bacteriolytic Microorganism. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1963, 29, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dashiff, A.; Kadouri, D.E. Predation of Oral Pathogens by Bdellovibrio Bacteriovorus 109J. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2011, 26, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, H.; Wang, H.; Yu, J.; An, J.; Chen, J. Encapsulated Bdellovibrio Powder as a Potential Bio-Disinfectant Against Whiteleg Shrimp-Pathogenic Vibrios. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Coatings 11 00605 g001 550
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of film-forming materials: sodium alginate( Coatings 11 00605 i001), tapioca starch ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), hydrolyzed collagen ( Coatings 11 00605 i003).
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of film-forming materials: sodium alginate( Coatings 11 00605 i001), tapioca starch ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), hydrolyzed collagen ( Coatings 11 00605 i003).
Coatings 11 00605 g001
Coatings 11 00605 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of biofilms: StA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i001), CA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), and CA-S ( Coatings 11 00605 i003). The arrow indicates a new peak at 1078 cm − 1 in the CA-S sample.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of biofilms: StA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i001), CA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), and CA-S ( Coatings 11 00605 i003). The arrow indicates a new peak at 1078 cm − 1 in the CA-S sample.
Coatings 11 00605 g002
Coatings 11 00605 g003 550
Figure 3. DSC thermograms of casting films: StA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i003), CA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), and CA-S ( Coatings 11 00605 i001). Zooming in on a portion of the graph showing the melting point of the CA-G and CA-S films.
Figure 3. DSC thermograms of casting films: StA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i003), CA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), and CA-S ( Coatings 11 00605 i001). Zooming in on a portion of the graph showing the melting point of the CA-G and CA-S films.
Coatings 11 00605 g003
Coatings 11 00605 g004 550
Figure 4. Glass transition of film-forming polymers: collagen ( Coatings 11 00605 i003), sodium alginate ( Coatings 11 00605 i001), and tapioca starch ( Coatings 11 00605 i002).
Figure 4. Glass transition of film-forming polymers: collagen ( Coatings 11 00605 i003), sodium alginate ( Coatings 11 00605 i001), and tapioca starch ( Coatings 11 00605 i002).
Coatings 11 00605 g004
Coatings 11 00605 g005 550
Figure 5. Diffraction patterns and percent crystallinity ( C r ) of biopolymeric films: CA-S ( Coatings 11 00605 i001), CA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), StA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i003). The arrow indicates a shoulder in the CA-G sample.
Figure 5. Diffraction patterns and percent crystallinity ( C r ) of biopolymeric films: CA-S ( Coatings 11 00605 i001), CA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i002), StA-G ( Coatings 11 00605 i003). The arrow indicates a shoulder in the CA-G sample.
Coatings 11 00605 g005
Coatings 11 00605 g006 550
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy of B. bacteriovorus HD100 in: (a) CA-S film at 5000×, and (b) 1512×; (c,d) CA-G film at 10,000×; (e,f) StA-G film at 10,000×. The red circles enclose B. bacteriovorus, the arrow points to some specimens embedded in the polymeric matrices, and the green circle encloses a prominence attributed to collagen fibrils.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy of B. bacteriovorus HD100 in: (a) CA-S film at 5000×, and (b) 1512×; (c,d) CA-G film at 10,000×; (e,f) StA-G film at 10,000×. The red circles enclose B. bacteriovorus, the arrow points to some specimens embedded in the polymeric matrices, and the green circle encloses a prominence attributed to collagen fibrils.
Coatings 11 00605 g006
Coatings 11 00605 g007 550
Figure 7. Comparison of lytic plaques developed by B. bacteriovorus HD100 on the lawn of Escherichia coli DH5 α prey cells. Inhibition zones are observed in StA-G (a), CA-G (b), and CA-S (c) plaques.
Figure 7. Comparison of lytic plaques developed by B. bacteriovorus HD100 on the lawn of Escherichia coli DH5 α prey cells. Inhibition zones are observed in StA-G (a), CA-G (b), and CA-S (c) plaques.
Coatings 11 00605 g007
Coatings 11 00605 g008 550
Figure 8. Viability of Escherichia coli DH5 α (CFU/mL) in co-cultivation with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100. * The cell counts were significantly reduced (p< 0.05) after 24 and 48 h.
Figure 8. Viability of Escherichia coli DH5 α (CFU/mL) in co-cultivation with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100. * The cell counts were significantly reduced (p< 0.05) after 24 and 48 h.
Coatings 11 00605 g008
Table
Table 1. Mechanical properties and viability of B. bacteriovorus HD100 in the biofilms.
Table 1. Mechanical properties and viability of B. bacteriovorus HD100 in the biofilms.
AnalysisStA-GCA-GCA-S
Mechanical properties:
Thickness (m)32.6 ± 0.03 a96.6 ± 0.16 b37.9 ± 0.17 a
T S (MPa)3.166 ± 0.98 a0.965 ± 0.15 b4.781 ± 0.89 a
E (%)83.25 ± 8.07 b73.60 ± 7.96 c41.07 ± 5.23 a
Y M (MPa)0.031 ± 0.00 b0.021 ± 0.00 b0.746 ± 0.18 a
Viability of B. bacteriovorus in the films:
Cell density (PFU/g)2.8 × 10 7 c2.2 × 10 7 b3.0 × 10 8 a
E Y (%)80.5879.2893.46
Different letters (a–c) within a row indicate significant differences among the films (p < 0.05). TS: tensile stress; E: percentage of elongation; YM: young’s modulus; cell density: plaque-forming unit per gram of film; EY: entrapment yield.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sáenz-Santos, C.M.; Opemipo Oyedara, O.; García-Tejeda, Y.V.; Romero-Bastida, C.A.; García-Oropesa, E.M.; Villalobo, E.; Rodríguez-Pérez, M.A. Active Biopolymeric Films Inoculated with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, a Predatory Bacterium. Coatings 2021, 11, 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050605

AMA Style

Sáenz-Santos CM, Opemipo Oyedara O, García-Tejeda YV, Romero-Bastida CA, García-Oropesa EM, Villalobo E, Rodríguez-Pérez MA. Active Biopolymeric Films Inoculated with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, a Predatory Bacterium. Coatings. 2021; 11(5):605. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050605

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sáenz-Santos, Christian Mariel, Omotayo Opemipo Oyedara, Yunia Verónica García-Tejeda, Claudia A. Romero-Bastida, Esperanza Milagros García-Oropesa, Eduardo Villalobo, and Mario A. Rodríguez-Pérez. 2021. "Active Biopolymeric Films Inoculated with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, a Predatory Bacterium" Coatings 11, no. 5: 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050605

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop