Analysis of Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients over 8 Years: Single-Center Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in K. pneumoniae
2.2. Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in E. coli
2.3. Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in E. faecalis
2.4. Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in E. faecium
3. Discussion
3.1. The Importance of Presenting Population-Specific Susceptibility Reports
3.2. Differences and Trends in Etiology of UTIs in KTX Recipients between Transplant Centers
3.3. Comparison of Susceptibility Patterns with Other Studies
3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance in Relation to Patient-Dependent and Transplant-Dependent Factors
3.4.1. Gender of Recipients
3.4.2. Age of Recipients
3.4.3. Underlying Kidney Disease of Recipients
3.5. Limitations
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Qualification of Urine Samples
- In case a patient was hospitalized due to UTI with positive urine culture twice or more times within an administrative year, only the first antibiogram was included in the analysis and other samples from the same patient in that year were excluded (duplicates). In total, there were 783 samples we obtained from the laboratory in administrative years 2011–2018. After excluding duplicates, we were left with 723 samples as presented in the final analysis.
- Only final and verified results were used.
- No surveillance isolates were included.
- There were no temporal outbreaks of analyzed bacteria that might have affected the result.
4.2. Microbiology and Laboratory Methods
4.3. Statistical Analysis
4.4. Ethical Statement
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization (WHO). Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- Roca, I.; Akova, M.; Baquero, F.; Carlet, J.; Cavaleri, M.; Coenen, S.; Cohen, J.; Findlay, D.; Gyssens, I.; Heure, O.; et al. The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: Science for intervention. New Microbes New Infect. 2015, 6, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cervera, C.; van Delden, C.; Gavaldà, J.; Welte, T.; Akova, M.; Carratalà, J. Multidrug-resistant bacteria in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 49–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coussement, J.; Scemla, A.; Abramowicz, D.; Nagler, E.; Webster, A. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santoro-Lopes, G. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections after liver transplantation: An ever-growing challenge. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 6201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojciuk, B.; Myślak, M.; Pabisiak, K.; Ciechanowski, K.; Giedrys-Kalemba, S. Epidemiology of infections in kidney transplant recipients—Data miner’s approach. Transpl. Int. 2015, 28, 729–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boubaker, K.; Harzallah, A.; Ounissi, M.; Becha, M.; Guergueh, T.; Hedri, H.; Kaaroud, H.; Abderrahim, E.; Ben Abdellah, T.; Kheder, A. Rehospitalization After Kidney Transplantation During the First Year: Length, Causes and Relationship With Long-term Patient and Graft Survival. Transplant. Proc. 2011, 43, 1742–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karuthu, S.; Blumberg, E. Common Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012, 7, 2058–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nicolle, L. Urinary Tract Infections in Special Populations. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 28, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorentino, M.; Pesce, F.; Schena, A.; Simone, S.; Castellano, G.; Gesualdo, L. Updates on urinary tract infections in kidney transplantation. J. Nephrol. 2019, 32, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervera, C.; López-Medrano, F. Management of Urinary Tract Infection. Infect. Dis. Solid-Organ Transpl. Recip. 2019, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hryniewicz, W.; Holecki, M. Rekomendacje Diagnostyki, Terapii i Profilaktyki Zakażeń Układu Moczowego u Dorosłych. Available online: http://antybiotyki.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/Rekomendacje/uklmoczowyinternet.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- Bonkat, G.; Pickard, R.; Bartoletti, R.; Cai, T.; Bruyère, F.; Geerlings, S.; Köves, B.; Wagenlehner, F. EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections; European Association of Urology: Arnhem, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Gołębiewska, J.; Dębska-Ślizień, A.; Komarnicka, J.; Samet, A.; Rutkowski, B. Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplant. Proc. 2011, 43, 2985–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korth, J.; Kukalla, J.; Rath, P.; Dolff, S.; Krull, M.; Guberina, H.; Bienholz, A.; Wilde, B.; Becker, S.; Ross, B.; et al. Increased resistance of gram-negative urinary pathogens after kidney transplantation. BMC Nephrol. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pellé, G.; Vimont, S.; Levy, P.; Hertig, A.; Ouali, N.; Chassin, C.; Arlet, G.; Rondeau, E.; Vandewalle, A. Acute Pyelonephritis Represents a Risk Factor Impairing Long-Term Kidney Graft Function. Am. J. Transplant. 2007, 7, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, R.; Simkins, J.; Camargo, J.; Martinez, O.; Abbo, L. Solid organ transplant antibiograms: An opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 86, 460–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization (WHO). Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2015. Available online: https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/publications/global-action-plan/en/ (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- World Health Organization (WHO). Regional Office for South-East Asia. In Step-by-Step Approach for Development and Implementation of Hospital Antibiotic Policy and Standard Treatment Guidelines; 2011; Available online: https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s19184en/s19184en.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- POLTRANSPLANT 2020. Ośrodki Przeszczepiające Nerki. Available online: http://www.poltransplant.org.pl/nerka.html (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- POLTRANSPLANT 2020. Statystyka 2019. Available online: https://www.poltransplant.org.pl/statystyka_2019.html (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- Stefaniuk, E.; Suchocka, U.; Bosacka, K.; Hryniewicz, W. Etiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens responsible for community-acquired urinary tract infections in Poland. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 35, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thompson, K.; Venkatesh, B.; Finfer, S. Sepsis and septic shock: Current approaches to management. Intern. Med. J. 2019, 49, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe 2018; ECDC: Stockholm, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 14–28, 59–60.
- Gozdowska, J.; Czerwińska, M.; Chabros, Ł.; Młynarczyk, G.; Kwiatkowski, A.; Chmura, A.; Durlik, M. Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients Hospitalized at a Transplantation and Nephrology Ward: 1-Year Follow-up. Transplant. Proc. 2016, 48, 1580–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Origüen, J.; Fernández-Ruiz, M.; López-Medrano, F.; Ruiz-Merlo, T.; González, E.; Morales, J.; Fiorante, S.; San-Juan, R.; Villa, J.; Orellana, M.; et al. Progressive increase of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae urinary isolates from kidney transplant recipients over the past decade: Narrowing of the therapeutic options. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2016, 18, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawecki, D.; Pacholczyk, M.; Lagiewska, B.; Sawicka-Grzelak, A.; Durlik, M.; Mlynarczyk, G.; Chmura, A. Bacterial and Fungal Infections in the Early Post-transplantation Period After Liver Transplantation: Etiologic Agents and Their Susceptibility. Transplant. Proc. 2014, 46, 2777–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alangaden, G.; Thyagarajan, R.; Gruber, S.; Morawski, K.; Garnick, J.; El-Amm, J.; West, M.; Sillix, D.; Chandrasekar, P.; Haririan, A. Infectious complications after kidney transplantation: Current epidemiology and associated risk factors. Clin. Transplant. 2006, 20, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knoll, G. Kidney Transplantation in the Older Adult. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2013, 61, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yatsunenko, T.; Rey, F.; Manary, M.; Trehan, I.; Dominguez-Bello, M.; Contreras, M.; Magris, M.; Hidalgo, G.; Baldassano, R.; Anokhin, A.; et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 2012, 486, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lazińska, B.; Ciszek, M.; Rokosz, A.; Sawicka-Grzelak, A.; Paczek, L.; Luczak, M. Bacteriological urinalysis in patients after renal transplantation. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2005, 54, 317–323. [Google Scholar]
- Azap, Ö.; Togan, T.; Yesilkaya, A.; Arslan, H.; Haberal, M. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Uropathogen Escherichia coli in Renal Transplant Recipients: Dramatic Increase in Ciprofloxacin Resistance. Transplant. Proc. 2013, 45, 956–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Hecke, O.; Wang, K.; Lee, J.; Roberts, N.; Butler, C. Implications of Antibiotic Resistance for Patients’ Recovery From Common Infections in the Community: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanchez, G.; Babiker, A.; Master, R.; Luu, T.; Mathur, A.; Bordon, J. Antibiotic Resistance among Urinary Isolates from Female Outpatients in the United States in 2003 and 2012. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 2680–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gomila, A.; Shaw, E.; Carratalà, J.; Leibovici, L.; Tebé, C.; Wiegand, I.; Vallejo-Torres, L.; Vigo, J.; Morris, S.; Stoddart, M.; et al. Predictive factors for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria among hospitalised patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlowsky, J.; Lagacé-Wiens, P.; Simner, P.; DeCorby, M.; Adam, H.; Walkty, A.; Hoban, D.; Zhanel, G. Antimicrobial Resistance in Urinary Tract Pathogens in Canada from 2007 to 2009: CANWARD Surveillance Study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3169–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- CARA: Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance. Available online: http://www.can-r.com/ (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- Ben-Ami, R.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Arslan, H.; Pitout, J.; Quentin, C.; Calbo, E.; Azap, Ö.; Arpin, C.; Pascual, A.; Livermore, D.; et al. A Multinational Survey of Risk Factors for Infection with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Nonhospitalized Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muntean, D.; Horhat, F.; Bădițoiu, L.; Dumitrașcu, V.; Bagiu, I.; Horhat, D.; Coșniță, D.; Krasta, A.; Dugăeşescu, D.; Licker, M. Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Retrospective Study of Trends in a Tertiary Healthcare Unit. Medicina 2018, 54, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pouch, S.; Kubin, C.; Satlin, M.; Tsapepas, D.; Lee, J.; Dube, G.; Pereira, M. Epidemiology and outcomes of carbapenem-resistantKlebsiella pneumoniaebacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2015, 17, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Delmas-Frenette, C.; Dorais, M.; Tavares-Brum, A.; Frenette, C.; Yang, B.; Medani, S.; Duclos, A.; Rouleau, D.; Mawad, H.; Barama, A.; et al. Epidemiology and outcome of antimicrobial resistance to gram-negative pathogens in bacteriuric kidney transplant recipients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2017, 19, e12722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar Prajapati, A. Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetics. Microbiol. Urin. Tract Infect. Microb. Agents Predisposing Factors 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Linares, L.; Cervera, C.; Cofán, F.; Lizaso, D.; Marco, F.; Ricart, M.; Esforzado, N.; Oppenheimer, F.; Campistol, J.; Moreno, A. Risk Factors for Infection with Extended-Spectrum and AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Rods in Renal Transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2008, 8, 1000–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data; Approved Guideline-Third Edition; CLSI Document M39-A4; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Category | K. pneumoniae | E. coli | E. faecalis | E. faecium | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (% of n) | % of Samples N | n (% of n) | % of Samples N | n (% of n) | % of Samples N | n (% of n) | % of Samples N | N | ||
258 (100%) | 33.0% | 212 (100%) | 27.0% | 188 (100%) | 24.0% | 125 (100%) | 16.0% | 783 | ||
Gender | Males | 130 (50.4%) | 40.4% | 60 (28.3%) | 18.6% | 86 (45.7%) | 26.7% | 46 (36.8%) | 14.3% | 322 |
Females | 128 (49.6%) | 27.8% | 152 (71.7%) | 33.0% | 102 (54.3%) | 22.1% | 79 (63.2%) | 17.1% | 461 | |
Age of a patient [y] | <29 | 20 (7.7%) | 36.4% | 13 (6.1%) | 23.6% | 10 (5.3%) | 18.2% | 12 (9.6%) | 21.8% | 55 |
30–39 | 40 (15.5%) | 29.9% | 31 (14.6%) | 23.1% | 43 (22.9%) | 32.1% | 20 (16.0%) | 14.9% | 134 | |
40–49 | 41 (15.9%) | 33.6% | 39 (18.4%) | 32.0% | 25 (13.3%) | 20.5% | 17 (13.6%) | 13.9% | 122 | |
50–59 | 67 (26.0%) | 34.4% | 49 (23.1%) | 25.1% | 48 (25.5%) | 24.6% | 31 (24.8%) | 15.9% | 195 | |
60–69 | 72 (27.9%) | 34.0% | 62 (29.3%) | 29.2% | 45 (24.0%) | 21.2% | 33 (26.4%) | 15.6% | 212 | |
70< | 18 (7.0%) | 27.7% | 18 (8.5%) | 27.7% | 17 (9.0%) | 26.2% | 12 (9.6%) | 18.4% | 65 | |
Years from KTX procedure [y] | <10 | 186 (72.1%) | 37.9% | 109 (51.4%) | 22.2% | 110 (58.5%) | 22.4% | 86 (68.8%) | 17.5% | 491 |
11–20 | 54 (20.9%) | 25.2% | 79 (37.3%) | 36.9% | 56 (29.8%) | 26.2% | 25 (20.0%) | 11.7% | 214 | |
21< | 16 (6.2%) | 22.9% | 22 (10.4%) | 31.4% | 18 (9.6%) | 25.7% | 14 (11.2%) | 20.0% | 70 | |
nd | 2 (0.8%) | 25.0% | 2 (0.9%) | 25.0% | 4 (2.1%) | 50.0% | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 8 | |
Number of KTX*: | I KTX | 218 (84.5%) | 32.3% | 186 (87.7%) | 27.5% | 163 (86.7%) | 24.1% | 109 (87.2%) | 16.1% | 676 |
II KTX | 33 (12.8%) | 37.5% | 22 (10.4%) | 25.0% | 19 (10.1%) | 21.6% | 14 (11.2%) | 15.9% | 88 | |
III KTX | 5 (1.9%) | 45.4% | 2 (0.9%) | 18.2% | 2 (1.1%) | 18.2% | 2 (1.6%) | 18.2% | 11 | |
nd | 2 (0.8%) | 25.0% | 2 (0.9%) | 25.0% | 4 (2.1%) | 50.0% | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 8 | |
Type of TX: KTX alone or with other organs | KTX alone | 217 (84.1%) | 32.4% | 190 (89.6%) | 28.4% | 158 (84.1%) | 23.6% | 104 (83.2%) | 15.6% | 669 |
KTX + Bricker | 21 (8.1%) | 32.8% | 11 (5.2%) | 17.2% | 19 (10.1%) | 29.7% | 13 (10.4%) | 20.3% | 64 | |
KTX + heart | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 1 (0.5%) | 50.0% | 1 (0.5%) | 50.0% | 0 (0.0% | 0.0% | 2 | |
KTX + pancreas | 16 (6.2%) | 47.1% | 8 (3.8%) | 23.5% | 4 (2.1%) | 11.8% | 6 (4.8%) | 17.6% | 34 | |
KTX + liver | 2 (0.8%) | 33.3% | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 2 (1.1%) | 33.3% | 2 (1.6%) | 33.3% | 6 | |
nd | 2 (0.8%) | 25.0% | 2 (0.9%) | 25.0% | 4 (2.1%) | 50.0% | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 8 | |
KTX donor: living or deceased | Living | 21 (8.1%) | 43.8% | 11 (5.2%) | 22.9% | 9 (4.8%) | 18.8% | 7 (5.6%) | 14.6% | 48 |
Deceased | 235 (91.1%) | 32.2% | 199 (93.9%) | 27.3% | 177 (94.1%) | 24.3% | 118 (94.4%) | 16.2% | 729 | |
nd | 2 (0.8%) | 33.3% | 2 (0.9%) | 33.3% | 2 (1.1%) | 33.3% | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 6 | |
KTX donor: related or unrelated | Related | 16 (6.2%) | 47.0% | 9 (4.3%) | 26.5% | 5 (2.6%) | 14.7% | 4 (3.2%) | 11.8% | 34 |
Unrelated | 240 (93.0%) | 32.3% | 201 (94.8%) | 27.0% | 181 (96.3%) | 24.4% | 121 (96.8%) | 16.3% | 743 | |
nd | 2 (0.8%) | 33.3% | 2 (0.9%) | 33.3% | 2 (1.1%) | 33.3% | 0 (0.0%) | 0.0% | 6 |
Underlying Kidney Disease. | N of Patients |
---|---|
Glomerulonephritis | 56 |
Urologic | 44 |
Polycystic kidney disease | 41 |
Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 | 39 |
Hypertension | 12 |
Systemic disease * (e.g., vasculitis) | 7 |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis | 6 |
Interstitial nephritis | 5 |
Sepsis | 3 |
Unclear or mixed cause | 33 |
Other | 7 |
No data | 5 |
S% to ATB in K. pneumoniae | AMC | CIP | MEM | TZP | TMP/SMX | CRO | CXM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 N = 25 | S% | 24.0% | 16.0% | 88.0% | 28.0% | 16.0% | 24.0% | 20.0% |
95% CI | 11.5–43.4 | 6.4–34.7 | 70.0–95.8 | 14.3–47.6 | 6.4–34.7 | 11.5–43.4 | 8.9–39.1 | |
2012 N = 22 | S% | 13.6% | 27.3% | 95.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | 31.8% | 31.8% |
95% CI | 4.7–33.3 | 13.2–48.2 | 78.2–99.2 | 16.4–52.7 | 16.4–52.7 | 16.4–52.7 | 16.4–52.7 | |
2013 N = 37 | S% | 2.7% | 18.9% | 100.0% | 21.6% | 43.2% | 27.0% | 18.9% |
95% CI | 0.5–13.8 | 9.5–34.2 | 90.6–100.0 | 11.4–37.2 | 28.7–59.1 | 15.4–43.0 | 9.5–34.2 | |
2014 N = 27 | S% | 7.4% | 11.1% | 100.0% | 14.8% | 14.8% | 29.6% | 18.5% |
95% CI | 2.1–23.4 | 3.9–28.1 | 87.5–100.0 | 5.9–32.5 | 5.9–32.5 | 15.9–48.5 | 8.2–36.7 | |
2015 N = 37 | S% | 0.0% | 21.6% | 97.3% | 18.9% | 24.3% | 21.6% | 21.6% |
95% CI | 0.0–9.4 | 11.4–37.2 | 86.2–99.5 | 9.5–34.2 | 13.4–40.1 | 11.4–37.2 | 11.4–37.2 | |
2016 N = 50 | S% | 10.0% | 16.0% | 94.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 22.0% | 20.0% |
95% CI | 4.3–21.4 | 8.3–28.5 | 83.8–97.9 | 11.2–33 | 11.2–33 | 12.8–35.2 | 11.2–33.0 | |
2017 N = 34 | S% | 32.4% | 23.5% | 85.3% | 32.4% | 26.5% | 20.6% | 20.6% |
95% CI | 19.1–49.2 | 12.4–40.0 | 69.9–93.6 | 19.1–49.2 | 14.6–63.1 | 10.3–36.8 | 10.3–36.8 | |
2018 N = 26 | S% | 26.9% | 15.4% | 92.3% | 26.9% | 38.5% | 34.6% | 30.8% |
95% CI | 13.7–46.1 | 6.2–33.5 | 75.9–97.9 | 13.7–46.1 | 22.4–57.5 | 19.4–53.8 | 16.5–50.0 | |
Total Ntotal = 258 | S% avg | 13.6% | 18.6% | 94.2% | 23.6% | 26.7% | 25.6% | 22.1% |
95% CI | 9.9–19.3 | 14.3–23.8 | 90.6–96.4 | 18.9–29.2 | 21.7–32.5 | 20.6–31.2 | 17.5–27.5 |
S% ATB in E. coli | AMC | MEM | TZP | SXT | CIP | FOF | CRO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 N = 35 NFOF = 24 | S% | 62.9% | 100.0% | 82.9% | 48.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 80.0% |
95% CI | 46.3–76.8 | 90.1–100.0 | 67.3–91.9 | 33.0–64.4 | 90.1–100.0 | 86.2–100.0 | 64.1–90.0 | |
2012 N = 33 NFOF = 30 | S% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 78.8% | 45.5% | 54.5% | 96.7% | 75.8% |
95% CI | 49.6–80.2 | 89.6–100.0 | 62.2–89.3 | 29.8–62.0 | 38.0–70.2 | 72.7–95.2 | 59.0–87.2 | |
2013 N = 31 | S% | 61.3% | 100.0% | 80.6% | 54.8% | 35.5% | 100.0% | 83.9% |
95% CI | 43.8–76.3 | 89.0–100.0 | 63.7–90.8 | 37.8–70.8 | 21.1–53.1 | 89.0–100.0 | 67.4–92.9 | |
2014 N = 30 | S% | 70.0% | 100.0% | 76.7% | 46.7% | 56.7% | 100.0% | 96.7% |
95% CI | 52.1–83.3 | 88.6–100.0 | 59.1–88.2 | 30.2–63.9 | 39.2–72.6 | 88.6–100.0 | 83.3–99.4 | |
2015 N = 23 | S% | 82.6% | 100.0% | 95.7% | 47.8% | 52.2% | 100.0% | 91.3% |
95% CI | 62.9–93.0 | 85.7–100.0 | 79.0–99.2 | 29.2–67.0 | 33.0–70.8 | 85.7–100.0 | 73.2–97.6 | |
2016 N = 29 NFOF = 28 | S% | 41.4% | 100.0% | 96.6% | 41.4% | 34.5% | 92.9% | 86.2% |
95% CI | 25.5–59.3 | 88.3–100.0 | 82.8–99.4 | 25.5–59.3 | 19.9–52.7 | 73.6–96.4 | 69.4–94.5 | |
2017 N = 16 | S% | 31.3% | 93.8% | 75.0% | 50.0% | 56.3% | 100.0% | 81.3% |
95% CI | 14.2–55.6 | 71.7–98.9 | 50.5–89.8 | 28.0–72.0 | 33.2–76.9 | 80.6–100.0 | 57.0–93.4 | |
2018 N = 15 | S% | 40.0% | 100.0% | 73.3% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 93.3% | 73.3% |
95% CI | 19.8–64.3 | 79.6–100.0 | 48.0–89.1 | 19.8–64.3 | 19.8–64.3 | 70.2–98.8 | 48.0–89.1 | |
Total Ntotal = 212 Ntotal–FOF = 193 | S% avg | 59.4% | 99.5% | 83.0% | 47.2% | 55.7% | 98.0% | 84.0% |
95% CI | 52.7–65.8 | 97.4–99.9 | 77.4–87.5 | 40.6–53.9 | 48.9–62.2 | 94.9–99.2 | 78.4–88.3 |
S% to ATB in E. faecalis | AMP | FOF | IPM | VAN | LZD | GEN HL (s) | STR HL (s) | TGC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 and 2012 N = 34 | S% | 97.1% | 100.0% | 97.1% | 97.1% | 100.0% | 44.1% | 44.1% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 85.1–99.5 | 89.9–100.0 | 85.1–99.5 | 85.1–99.5 | 89.9–100.0 | 28.9–60.5 | 28.9–60.5 | 89.9–100.0 | |
2013 N = 21 NIPM = 20 | S% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 28.6% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 84.5–100.0 | 84.5–100.0 | 83.9–100.0 | 84.5–100.0 | 84.5–100.0 | 13.8–50.0 | 17.2–54.6 | 84.5–100.0 | |
2014 N = 27 | S% | 92.6% | 100.0% | 92.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 51.9% | 44.4% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 76.6–97.9 | 87.5–100.0 | 76.6–97.9 | 87.5–100.0 | 87.5–100.0 | 34.0–69.3 | 27.6–62.7 | 87.5–100.0 | |
2015 N = 31 NGEN = 30NSTR = 30 | S% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 46.7% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 89.0–100.0 | 89.0–100.0 | 89.0–100.0 | 89.0–100.0 | 89.0–100.0 | 30.2–63.9 | 33.2–66.8 | 89.0–100.0 | |
2016 N = 33 | S% | 100.0% | 97.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 42.4% | 45.5% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 89.6–100.0 | 84.7–99.5 | 89.6–100.0 | 89.6–100.0 | 89.6–100.0 | 27.2–59.2 | 29.8–62.0 | 89.6–100.0 | |
2017 N = 20 | S% | 90.0% | 95.0% | 95.0% | 95.0% | 100.0% | 35.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 69.9–97.2 | 76.4–99.1 | 76.4–99.1 | 76.4–99.1 | 83.9–100.0 | 18.1–56.7 | 29.9–70.1 | 83.9–100.0 | |
2018 N = 22 NSTR = 21 | S% | 100.0% | 86.4% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 95.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 85.1–100.0 | 66.7–95.3 | 85.1–100.0 | 85.1–100.0 | 78.2–99.2 | 30.7–69.3 | 24.5–63.5 | 85.1–100.0 | |
Total Ntotal = 188 Ntotal–IPM = 187 Ntotal–GEN = 187 Ntotal–STR = 186 | S% avg | 97.3% | 97.3% | 97.9% | 98.9% | 99.5% | 43.3% | 44.6% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 93.9–98.9 | 93.9–98.9 | 94.6–99.2 | 96.2–99.7 | 97.0–99.9 | 36.4–50.5 | 37.7–51.8 | 98.0–100.0 |
S% to ATB in E. faecium | LZD | VAN | GEN HL (s) | STR HL (s) | TGC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 N = 12 | S% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 33.3% | 16.7% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 75.8–100.0 | 39.1–86.2 | 13.8–60.9 | 4.7–44.8 | 75.8–100.0 | |
2012 N = 12 NGEN = 11 NSTR = 11 | S% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 45.5% | 9.1% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 75.8–100.0 | 39.1–86.2 | 21.3–72.0 | 1.6–37.7 | 75.8–100.0 | |
2013 N = 15 | S% | 100.0% | 80.0% | 40.0% | 26.7% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 79.6–100.0 | 54.8–93.0 | 19.8–64.3 | 10.9–52.0 | 79.6–100.0 | |
2014 N = 13 | S% | 100.0% | 61.5% | 46.2% | 15.4% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 77.2–100.0 | 35.5–82.3 | 23.2–70.9 | 4.3–42.2 | 77.2–100.0 | |
2015 N = 11 NGEN = 10 | S% | 100.0% | 45.5% | 30.0% | 18.2% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 74.1–100.0 | 21.3–72.0 | 10.8–60.3 | 5.1–47.7 | 74.1–100.0 | |
2016 N = 28 | S% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 46.4% | 7.1% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 87.9–100.0 | 32.6–67.4 | 29.5–64.2 | 2.0–22.6 | 87.9–100.0 | |
2017 N = 19 | S% | 100.0% | 47.4% | 42.1% | 26.3% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 83.2–100.0 | 27.3–68.3 | 23.1–63.7 | 11.8–48.8 | 83.2–100.0 | |
2018 N = 15 NGEN = 14 | S% | 93.3% | 60.0% | 92.9% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 70.2–98.8 | 35.7–80.2 | 68.5–98.7 | 15.2–58.3 | 79.6–100.0 | |
Total Ntotal = 125 Ntotal–GEN = 122 Ntotal–STR = 124 | S% avg | 99.2% | 58.4% | 47.5% | 18.5% | 100.0% |
95% CI | 95.6–99.9 | 49.6–66.7 | 38.9–56.3 | 12.7–26.3 | 97.0–100.0 |
Species and Antimicrobial Agent | MIC Breakpoints (mg/L) | |
---|---|---|
K. pneumoniae and E. coli | S≤ | R> |
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | 8 | 8 |
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 8 | 16 |
Cefuroxime axetil | 8 | 8 |
Ceftriaxone | 1 | 2 |
Meropenem | 2 | 8 |
Ciprofloxacin 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 2 | 4 |
E. coli and E. faecalis | ||
Fosfomycin/trometamol 2 | ≥16 mm | ≤12 mm |
E. faecalis and E. faecium | ||
Ampicillin | 4 | 8 |
Imipenem | 4 | 8 |
Vancomycin | 4 | 4 |
Linezolid | 4 | 4 |
Gentamicin HL 3 | reported as S or R only 4 | |
Streptomycin HL 3 | reported as S or R only 4 | |
Tigecycline | 0.25 | 0.25 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rostkowska, O.M.; Kuthan, R.; Burban, A.; Salińska, J.; Ciebiera, M.; Młynarczyk, G.; Durlik, M. Analysis of Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients over 8 Years: Single-Center Study. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060284
Rostkowska OM, Kuthan R, Burban A, Salińska J, Ciebiera M, Młynarczyk G, Durlik M. Analysis of Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients over 8 Years: Single-Center Study. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(6):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060284
Chicago/Turabian StyleRostkowska, Olga Maria, Robert Kuthan, Anna Burban, Jagoda Salińska, Michał Ciebiera, Grażyna Młynarczyk, and Magdalena Durlik. 2020. "Analysis of Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients over 8 Years: Single-Center Study" Antibiotics 9, no. 6: 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060284
APA StyleRostkowska, O. M., Kuthan, R., Burban, A., Salińska, J., Ciebiera, M., Młynarczyk, G., & Durlik, M. (2020). Analysis of Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients over 8 Years: Single-Center Study. Antibiotics, 9(6), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060284