Next Article in Journal
Comparative In Vitro Activities of First and Second-Generation Ceragenins Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics Against Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains
Next Article in Special Issue
Resistance Levels and Epidemiology of Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections of Inpatients and Outpatients (RENFUTI): A 10-Year Epidemiological Snapshot
Previous Article in Journal
Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Malaysia: A Review of Antimicrobial Resistance and Characteristics of the Clinical Isolates, 1990–2017
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients

by
Márió Gajdács
1,* and
Fernando Albericio
2,3
1
Department of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Dóm tér 10., 6720 Szeged, Hungary
2
School of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
3
Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, CIBER-BBN, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2019, 8(3), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030129
Submission received: 20 August 2019 / Accepted: 26 August 2019 / Published: 27 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients)
The discovery and subsequent clinical introduction of antibiotics is one of the most important game-changers in the history of medicine [1]. These drugs have saved millions of lives from infections that would previously have been fatal, and later, they allowed for the introduction of surgical interventions, organ transplantation, care of premature infants, and cancer chemotherapy [2]. Nevertheless, the therapy of bacterial infections is becoming less and less straightforward due to the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) in these pathogens [3]. Direct consequences of antibiotic resistance include delays in the onset of the appropriate (effective) antimicrobial therapy, the need to use older, more toxic antibiotics (e.g., colistin) with a disadvantageous side-effect profile, longer hospital stays, and an increasing burden on the healthcare infrastructure; overall, a decrease in the quality-of-life (QoL) and an increase in the mortality rate of the affected patients [4,5]. To highlight the severity of the issue, several international declarations have been published to call governments around the globe to take action on antimicrobial resistance [6,7,8,9].
Since the 1980s, pharmaceutical companies have slowly turned away from antimicrobial research and towards the drug therapy of chronic non-communicable diseases [10,11]. New antimicrobials are usually used as last-resort agents in a narrow patient population, resulting in smaller profits [12]. Additionally, drug companies are failing to keep up with the developments in global resistance levels; development of non-susceptibility to the novel antibiotics is inevitable, shortening the period of clinical usefulness of these drugs [13]. During the last years, a number of antibiotics have received marketing authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (Table 1) [14,15,16].
Although the number of newly marketed antibiotics and the current state of the antimicrobial pipeline offers hope (owing to government-funded research programs and public–private partnerships, generating incentive for pharmaceutical companies), there are several pathogens where providing appropriate therapy is still a major concern [10,11,12,13]. Based on their resistance levels and clinical significance, the so-called “ESKAPE” pathogens (Table 2) receive the utmost attention when it comes to the development of novel antimicrobials [17,18,19,20,21]. This was further highlighted after the World Health Organization declared these microorganisms as priority pathogens for pharmaceutical companies [22].
One of the main driving forces behind the development of antibacterial drug resistance is the misuse and overuse of these drugs, both in human medicine and in agriculture [1,2,3]. Thus, programs and interventions aiming at optimizing the use of antimicrobial drugs (such as implementation of policies and guidelines, drug utilization reports, point prevalence surveys, both locally and internationally), collectively termed “antimicrobial stewardship”, have received substantial attention [23]. Antimicrobial stewardship includes decisions like the selection of the dose and duration of the most appropriate antimicrobial(s) for the patient with limited or no side effects, ensuring minimal impact on local resistance levels, ensuring their availability and efficacy for the future [24]. In addition, the implementation of rapid diagnostic techniques in clinical microbiology laboratories (diagnostic stewardship) to aid the choice of drug therapy is another emerging facet of antimicrobial stewardship [25]. This is also highlighted in scientific research; while in 2008, there were only n = 45 articles on this topic, in 2018, a nearly twenty-fold increase was observed (n = 804). To attain changes clinical practice, the appropriate attitude of healthcare professionals and their continuous professional development is of utmost importance [26,27].
Considering the importance of antibiotic resistance and its effects on the QoL of patients and on the state of healthcare infrastructures as a whole, it is our pleasure to co-edit the Special Issue in Antibiotics, termed “Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients”. The Special Issue contains excellent quality research articles and comprehensive review papers on the epidemiology of various MDR pathogens worldwide, novel diagnostic and point-of-care (POCT) tests, interventional studies on antimicrobial drug utilization and pharmaco-epidemiological studies. In addition, the Special Issue welcomes reports on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare professionals (nurses, doctors, pharmacists, etc.) and patients regarding antibiotics and antibiotic resistance.

Author Contributions

M.G. and F.A. equally contributed in writing the article.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Márió Gajdács was supported by the National Youth Excellence Scholarship (Grant Number NTP-NTFÖ-18-C-0225) and the ESCMID Mentorship and Observership Programme. Fernando Albericio was partially supported by Fundació La Marató (Grant 201835-31).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gaynes, R. The Discovery of Penicillin—New Insights after More Than 75 Years of Clinical Use. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 849–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shallcross, L.J.; Howard, S.J.; Fowler, T.; Davies, S.C. Tackling the threat of antimicrobial resistance: From policy to sustainable action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Laxminarayan, R.; Duse, A.; Wattal, C.; Zaidi, A.K.M.; Wertheim, H.F.L.; Sumpradit, N.; Vlieghe, E.; Hara, G.L.; Gould, I.M.; Goossens, H.; et al. Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 1057–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cassini, A.; Högberg, D.L.; Plachouras, D.; Quattrocchi, A.; Hoxha, A.; Simonsen, G.N.; Colomb-Cotinat, M.; Kretzschmar, M.E.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Cecchini, M.; et al. Burden of the AMR Collaborative Group. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gajdács, M.; Urbán, E. Comparative Epidemiology and Resistance Trends of Proteae in Urinary Tract Infections of Inpatients and Outpatients: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. O’Neill, J. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations. Available online: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/AMRReviewPaper-Tacklingacrisisforthehealthandwealthofnations_1.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2019).
  7. World Health Organisation. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–256. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112642/1/9789241564748_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 18 August 2019).
  8. ECDC/EMEA Joint Technical Report (2009). The Bacterial Challenge: Time to React. Available online: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/0909_TER_The_Bacterial_Challenge_Time_to_React.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2019).
  9. CDC Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance (AR/AMR). Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html (accessed on 18 August 2019).
  10. Darrow, J.J.; Kesselheim, A.S. Drug development and FDA approval, 1938–2013. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gajdács, M. The concept of an ideal antibiotic: Implications for drug design. Molecules 2019, 24, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Infectious Diseases Society of America. The 10 x ’20 Initiative: Pursuing a global commitment to develop 10 new antibacterial drugs by 2020. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 1081–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Projan, S.J. Why is big Pharma getting out of antibacterial drug discovery? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. de la Torre, B.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2018. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2019, 24, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Karaiskos, I.; Lagou, S.; Pontikis, K.; Rapti, V.; Poulakou, G. The “Old” and the “New” Antibiotics for MDR Gram-Negative Pathogens: For Whom, When, and How. Front. Public Health 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abbas, M.; Paul, M.; Huttner, A. New and improved? A review of novel antibiotics for Gram-positive bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Rice, L.B. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: No ESKAPE. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 197, 1079–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gajdács, M. The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sheu, C.C.; Chang, Y.T.; Lin, S.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Hsueh, P.R. Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An Update on Therapeutic Options. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Gajdács, M.; Urbán, E. Epidemiological Trends and Resistance Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Hungary. Diseases 2019, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ahmed, M.O.; Baptiste, K.E. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: A Review of Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Perspectives of Human and Animal Health. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 590–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. World Health Organization. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–7. Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2019).
  23. Ha, D.R.; Haste, N.M.; Gluckstein, D.P. The Role of Antibiotic Stewardship in Promoting Appropriate Antibiotic Use. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dyar, O.J.; Huttner, B.; Schouten, J.; Pulcini, C. What is antimicrobial stewardship? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Morgan, D.J.; Malani, P.; Diekema, D.J. Diagnostic stewardship-leveraging the laboratory to improve antimicrobial use. JAMA 2017, 318, 607–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gajdács, M.; Paulik, E.; Szabó, A. [The opinions of community pharmacists related to antibiotic use and resistance] (article in Hungarian). Acta Pharm. Hung. 2018, 88, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dyar, O.J.; Hills, H.; Seitz, L.T.; Perry, A.; Ashiru-Oredope, D. Assessing the Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors of Human and Animal Health Students towards Antibiotic Use and Resistance: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study in the UK. Antibiotics (Basel) 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Antibiotics recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Table 1. Antibiotics recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Active Pharmaceutical IngredientTrade NameClass/Comments
DoripenemDoribax (US)
Finibax (EU)
Carbapenem
Ceftaroline fosamilTeflaro (US)
Zinforo (EU)
Cephalosporin
Ceftobiprole medocarilZevtera(US)
Mabelio (EU)
Cephalosporin
Ceftolozane/tazobactamZerbaxa (US/EU)Combination antibiotic: cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor
Ceftazidime/avibactamAvycaz (US/EU)Combination antibiotic: cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor
Meropenem/vaborbactamVabomere (US)
Carbavance (EU)
Combination antibiotic: carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor
Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam Recarbrio (US/EU)Combination antibiotic: carbapenem/renal dehydropeptidase inhibitor/β-lactamase inhibitor
Telavancin Vibativ (US)Derivatives of either vancomycin or lipoglycopeptide
DalbavancinDalvance (US)
Xydalba (EU)
Derivatives of either vancomycin or lipoglycopeptide
Oritavancin Orbactiv (US/EU)Derivatives of either vancomycin or lipoglycopeptide
EravacyclineXerava (US/EU)Tetracycline derivatives
SarecyclineSeysara (US)Tetracycline derivatives
OmadacyclineNuzyra (US)Tetracycline derivatives
Bedaquiline,Sirturo (US/EU)Diarylquinoline (DARQ)
TedizolidSivextro (US/EU)Oxazolidinone
Delafloxacin meglumineBaxdela (US)Fluoroquinolone
PlazomicinZemdri (US)Next-generation aminoglycoside (neoglycoside)
LefamulinXenleta (US)Pleuromutilin
US: Trade name in the United States; EU: trade name in the member states of the European Union.
Table 2. Current list of ESKAPE pathogens.
Table 2. Current list of ESKAPE pathogens.
Pathogens
Enterococcus faecium
Staphylococcus aureus
(Stenotrophomonas maltophilia)
Klebsiella pneumoniae
(Clostridioides difficile)
Acinetobacter spp.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Enterobacter spp.
(members of Enterobacterales)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gajdács, M.; Albericio, F. Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030129

AMA Style

Gajdács M, Albericio F. Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients. Antibiotics. 2019; 8(3):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gajdács, Márió, and Fernando Albericio. 2019. "Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients" Antibiotics 8, no. 3: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030129

APA Style

Gajdács, M., & Albericio, F. (2019). Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients. Antibiotics, 8(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop