Next Article in Journal
Effect of Antimicrobial Compounds on the Survival and Pathogenic Potential of Acid-Adapted Salmonella Enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Orange Juice
Previous Article in Journal
Potent Antimicrobial Activity of Aspergillus oryzae Fermentate Against Toxigenic Strains of Clostridioides difficile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on the Antibacterial Activity of Natural Flavonoids

1
Key Laboratory of New Animal Drug Project of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730050, China
2
College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Congtai District, Handan 056038, China
3
Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutical Development of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou 730050, China
4
Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences of CAAS, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(4), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040334
Submission received: 13 February 2025 / Revised: 18 March 2025 / Accepted: 19 March 2025 / Published: 22 March 2025

Abstract

:
The use of antibiotics has greatly improved the treatment of bacterial infections; however, its abuse and misuse has led to a rapid rise in multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Therefore, the search for new antimicrobial strategies has become critical. Natural flavonoids, a class of widely existing phytochemicals, have gained significant research interest for their diverse biological activities and antibacterial effects on various drug-resistant bacteria. This review summarizes the latest research progress on flavonoids, with a particular focus on several flavonoids exhibiting certain antibacterial activity, and explores their antibacterial mechanisms, including disruption of cell membranes and cell walls, inhibition of proteins and nucleic acids, interference with signal transduction, suppression of efflux pump activity, and inhibition of biofilm formation and virulence factor production. Additionally, we have reviewed the synergistic combinations of flavonoids with antibiotics, such as the combination of quercetin with colistin or EGCG with tetracycline, which significantly enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Antibiotics are the cornerstone of the modern healthcare system, revolutionizing the treatment of bacterial infections and saving millions of lives [1,2]. However, the abuse and misuse of antibiotics has led to the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria at an alarming rate, posing a serious threat to human and animal health. In 2019, nearly 5 million deaths worldwide were linked to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [3], with 10 million deaths expected by 2050, more than the current number of deaths caused by cancer [4,5]. International organizations such as the World Health Organization have identified AMR as a major risk to public health [6]. Facing the challenges posed by drug resistance, it is essential to explore alternative drugs with potent antibacterial activity and unique mechanisms of action. A wide range of phytochemicals have been found to be potential antimicrobials, including terpenes, essential oils, alkaloids, lectins, peptides, and phenolic compounds [7,8]. Phenolic compounds encompass flavonoids (e.g., quercetin) [9], phenolic acids (e.g., caffeic acid) [10], tannins (e.g., tannic acid) [11], lignins (e.g., lignin) [12], coumarins (e.g., coumarin) [13], and more. Among these compounds, a considerable number of natural flavonoids have attracted the interest of many researchers due to their widespread presence, low toxicity, and high activity against drug-resistant bacteria [14,15].
Natural flavonoids are abundant phytochemicals widely present in various plants. Originally, flavonoids referred to a class of compounds derived from 2-phenylchromogen as the skeleton, and now generally refers to a series of compounds formed by two benzene rings connected by three carbon atoms, that is, a class of compounds with C6-C3-C6 structure (Figure 1) [16]. Based on the oxidation state and saturation of the heterocyclic ring, flavonoids can be mainly categorized into nine classes, including flavones (e.g., apigenin and luteolin), flavonols (e.g., quercetin and myricetin), flavanones (e.g., hesperidin and aringenin), flavanols or catechins (e.g., epicatechin and gallic catechins), chalcones (e.g., licochalcone A), dihydroflavonols (e.g., dihydromyricetin), aurones (e.g., aureusidin), anthocyanins (e.g., cyanidin), and isoflavones (e.g., genistein and daidzein) (Figure 1) [17]. Recently, flavonoids have been widely used in clinics for the control of different human diseases [18,19,20]. In addition to their known antioxidant, antidepressant, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities, flavonoids have gradually received widespread attention due to their favorable antibacterial effects against resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, MRSA) and amoxicillin-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli, AREC) [21,22].
Significant progress has been made in research on the antibacterial activity of flavonoids. Existing literature reviews have summarized the antibacterial effects and mechanisms of flavonoids [23,24,25], but these studies are mostly limited to single mechanisms of action or specific types of flavonoids. This review primarily compiles relevant literature from 2014 to 2024, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, using keywords such as “flavonoids”, “antibacterial and flavonoids”, “antibacterial mechanism and flavonoids”, “multidrug resistance”, and “synergistic effect of flavonoids”. It systematically summarizes the antibacterial activities, mechanisms of action, and synergistic effects of various flavonoids is intended to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of these compounds.

2. Antibacterial Activity of Natural Flavonoids

Recently, many researchers have conducted comprehensive studies on the antibacterial activity of natural flavonoids, revealing various flavonoids with different degrees of antibacterial activity against bacteria (Table 1).
Table 1. The antibacterial effect of some flavonoids.
Table 1. The antibacterial effect of some flavonoids.
CategoryS.NO.FlavonoidsChemical StructureMicroorganismMIC (μg/mL)Action MechanismReferences
Flavones1ApigeninAntibiotics 14 00334 i001Quinolone-resistant
S. aureus Mu50
4Targeting the gyrA subunit with the Ser84Leu mutation[26]
Meticillin-susceptible S. aureus FDA 209P>128Targeting the gyrA subunit with the Ser84Leu mutation[26]
P. aeruginosa PAO164-[27]
Klebsiella pneumoniae
ATCC 9997
64-[27]
2LuteolinAntibiotics 14 00334 i002MDR
Trueperella pyogenes
-Downregulating the expression of MATE-encoded efflux pump[28]
Clinical isolation MRSA500Damage to cell wall and membrane integrity[29]
P. aeruginosa PAO164-[27]
Klebsiella pneumoniae
ATCC 9997
64-[27]
3PatuletinAntibiotics 14 00334 i003S. aureus
ATCC 27853 and clinical strains
2000Inhibiting biofilm formation and production of virulence factor glucanthin[30]
4ChrysinAntibiotics 14 00334 i004S. aureus2–16Inhibition of α-hemolysin expression[31]
5DiosmetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i005S. aureus>128 -[32]
6TangeritinAntibiotics 14 00334 i006E. coli137Inhibition of DNA gyrase[33]
7NobiletinAntibiotics 14 00334 i007E. coli177Inhibition of DNA gyrase[33]
8AcacetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i008Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae)>32Inhibiting the formation of oligomers of pneumolysin (PLY) to attenuate its biological activity[34]
9WogoninAntibiotics 14 00334 i009S. aureus>128-[35]
10ScutellareinAntibiotics 14 00334 i010A. baumannii1024Inhibiting polyphosphate kinase 1 (PPK1)[36]
11EntadaninAntibiotics 14 00334 i011S. typhi1.56-[37]
Flavonols13′,4′, 7-trihydroxyflavoneAntibiotics 14 00334 i012E. coli ATCC873932Inhibiting efflux pump activity and enhancing the action of antibiotics[38]
Klebsiella pneumoniae
ATCC 11296
32Inhibiting efflux pump activity and enhancing the action of antibiotics[38]
P.aeruginosa PAO164Inhibiting efflux pump activity and enhancing the action of antibiotics[38]
2Rhamnetin 3-O--β-D-glucopyranosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i013S.aureus USA300-Regulating carbon or glutamine/glutamate metabolism and reducing precursors of biofilm formation, thereby inhibiting biofilm formation[39]
3KaempferolAntibiotics 14 00334 i014S. aureus
ATCC 29213
>1024Inhibiting the activity of sorting enzyme A to affect the formation of biofilm[40]
S. mutans
ATCC 25175
1000Inhibiting the enzyme activity of F-ATPase, destroying the ΔpH on the cell membrane, affecting the acidity of Streptococcus mutans[41]
Pneumococcus
NCTC 7466
-Decreasing the biological activity of sorting enzyme SrtA, inhibiting the formation of biofilm, and inhibiting the hemolytic activity of pulmonolysin[42]
S. epidermidis
DMST 5038
>1024-[43]
4Kaempferol-3-O-α-l-rhamnosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i015S. aureus 1199B0.78Inhibition of NorA transporter[44]
5QuercetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i016S. epidermidis
DMST 5038
256Damaging the cell membrane and increasing its permeability[45]
MRSA_A MRSE_178-Inhibiting the activity of ATP synthase and reducing the level of ATP in cells;
virulence-inhibiting factor coagulase
[43,45]
MRSA
ATCC 33591
-Stably binding to the formation site of SarA dimer, inhibiting biofilm formation, and reducing extracellular polymer production and eDNA concentration[46]
P. aeruginosa
NCIM 20136
20-[47]
E. coli NCIM 2065400-[47]
Serratia marcescens ATCC 14756175Inhibition of EPS production and biofilm formation[48]
S. pyogenes
DMST 30653
128Damaging the cell membrane and increasing its permeability[49]
6MorinAntibiotics 14 00334 i017S. pyogenes
MGAS 6180
-Inhibition of biofilm formation[50]
S. enteritidis #1150Inhibition of DNA synthesis[51]
Bacillus cereus
ATCC11778
300Inhibition of DNA synthesis[51]
7MyricetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i018E. coli
ATCC 25922
-Inhibition of DnaB helicase[52]
S. aureus
NCTC 8325-4
>1024Inhibiting the production of virulence factor Hla and neutralizing Hla activity[53]
S. aureus
ATCC 6538p
>1024Inhibiting sorting enzymes A (SrtA) and B (SrtB) activity[54]
8FisetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i019NDM-1-positive E. coli>1024Inhibiting New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) activity[55]
9GalanginAntibiotics 14 00334 i020Penicillin-resistant S. aureus200–300Inhibiting the activity of penicillinase and β-lactamase[56]
10AstragalinAntibiotics 14 00334 i021H. pylori0.49–1.25Interacts with proteins[57]
11RutinAntibiotics 14 00334 i022P. aeruginosa, MRSA500–1000Inhibiting biofilm formation, downregulating gene expression, destruction of cell membrane[58]
Flavanones1PinocembrinAntibiotics 14 00334 i023Neisseria gonorrhoeae
GC1–182
64-[59]
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC1911368-[60]
2HesperidinAntibiotics 14 00334 i024E. coli ATCC 25922-Inhibition of biofilm formation[61]
S.aureus ATCC 25923512-[62]
P. aeruginosa
IBRS P001
500-[58]
3HesperetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i025Helicobacter pylori
ATCC 49503
30.23Reducing the expression level of bacterial replication and transcription genes and inhibiting bacterial movement[63]
MRSA IBRS
MRSA 011
500-[58]
P.aeruginosa
IBRS P001
500-[58]
4NaringinAntibiotics 14 00334 i026Clinical isolation of Pseudomonas species128–512Inhibition of EPS production and biofilm formation[64]
S.aureus
ATCC 25923
512-[62]
P. aeruginosa
IBRS P001
250-[58]
E. coli
IBRS E003
500-[58]
5NaringeninAntibiotics 14 00334 i027S. mutans100–200 Inhibition of biofilm formation[65]
6EriodictyolAntibiotics 14 00334 i028S.aureus512Inhibiting alpha-hemolysin expression[66]
7LiquiritigeninAntibiotics 14 00334 i029S.aureus50–100Inhibiting alpha-hemolysin expression and may inhibit β-lactamase activity[67,68]
87-HydroxyflavanoneAntibiotics 14 00334 i030S. pneumoniae1000-[69]
9LupirifolinAntibiotics 14 00334 i031S. aureus and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis)0.5–2Binds to phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and cardiolipin (CL) in bacterial cell membranes, thereby disrupting the integrity of the cell membrane[70]
10OchnaflavoneAntibiotics 14 00334 i032P. aeruginosa31.3-[71]
11Sophoraflavanone GAntibiotics 14 00334 i033MRSA3.9Damages cell membrane, inhibits cell wall synthesis, interferes with energy metabolism[72]
12MimuloneAntibiotics 14 00334 i034MRSA2000–16,000Inhibiting the synthesis of peptidoglycan layer in bacterial cell wall and
inhibition of β-lactamase activity
[73]
13Sepicanin AAntibiotics 14 00334 i035MRSA998.7-[74]
Flavanols1Epigallocatechin gallateAntibiotics 14 00334 i036S.aureus
ATCC 25923
100Directly binding to peptidoglycan to interfere with the integrity of bacterial cell walls and biosynthesis and inhibiting penicillinase activity[75]
Porphyromonas gingivalis
ATCC 33277
250-[76]
Vibrio parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802128Damaging cell membrane integrity and inhibiting biofilm formation[77]
2EpigallocatechinAntibiotics 14 00334 i037Porphyromonas gingivalis 3811000-[76]
Porphyromonas gingivalis
ATCC 33277
1000-[76]
3CatechinAntibiotics 14 00334 i038E. coli1000–2000Downregulating the acrA gene, thereby inhibiting biofilm formation[78]
4(-)-EpicatechinAntibiotics 14 00334 i039S. Typhimurium>1024Inhibition with ATP[79]
5(-)-Epicatechin gallateAntibiotics 14 00334 i040S. Typhimurium>512Inhibiting biofilm formation[80]
6(-)-Catechin gallateAntibiotics 14 00334 i041MRSA256–512Inhibiting biofilm formation and disrupting the secretion of virulence-related proteins[81]
Isoflavones1GenisteinAntibiotics 14 00334 i042MRSA
Newman 67-0
- Inhibition of topoisomerase II and protein tyrosine kinase [82]
E. coli
ATCC 25922
5Inducing NO changes DNA and induces apoptosis[83]
2GlabridinAntibiotics 14 00334 i043MDRSA 4627-Increasing oxidative stress, altering the integrity of DNA and proteins, and disrupting cell morphology[84]
3FormononetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i044S. aureus200-[85]
E. faecalis6.6–18.3-[86]
4LupalbigeninAntibiotics 14 00334 i045S. aureus, E. faecalis, and Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes)4–8Inhibiting α-hemolysin and biofilm formation, and damaging bacterial cell membranes[87,88]
5Gancaonin MAntibiotics 14 00334 i046S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes2–8-[87]
6WarangaloneAntibiotics 14 00334 i047S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes2–8-[87]
7AuriculatinAntibiotics 14 00334 i048S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes2–4-[87]
8Millexatin FAntibiotics 14 00334 i049S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes1–4-[87]
9Millexatin AAntibiotics 14 00334 i050S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and B. subtilis2–128-[89]
10IsolupalbigeninAntibiotics 14 00334 i051MRSA1.56–3.13-[90]
11Erythrinin BAntibiotics 14 00334 i052MRSA6.25–12.5-[90]
12LaburnetinAntibiotics 14 00334 i053MRSA>25-[90]
Anthocyanins1Cyanidin-3-O-glucosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i054S.aureus
ATCC 25923, SJS001, SJS008, SJS009, SJS010
312.5Damaging cell membrane integrity[84]
E. coli
ATCC 25922
5000Damaging cell membrane integrity[84]
2Delphinidin-3-glucosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i055E. coli, S.aureus1660–7110-[91]
3Delphinidin-3-sambubiosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i056E. coli, S.aureus1660–7110-[91]
4Pelargonidin-3-glucosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i057E. coli-Inhibition of microbial ATP synthase[92]
5Malvidin-3-glucosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i058Staphylococcus250Inhibiting biofilm formation[93]
6Cyanidin-3-rutinosideAntibiotics 14 00334 i059P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae400–9500-[94]

2.1. The Mixture of Flavonoids Extracted from Plants

Studies on the antibacterial activity of flavonoids initially found that the mixed flavonoids extracted from plants had a significant inhibitory effect on microbial growth.
Zhong et al. [95] isolated six major flavonoids, including isoorientin, vitexin, isovitexin, rutin, quercetin, and kaempferol, from the crude methanol extract of Tartary buckwheat sprouts. The extract demonstrated significant inhibitory activity against Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) CMCC 50115, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens) ATCC 11158, Pseudomonas lachrymans (P. lachrymans) ATCC 11921, Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) ATCC 11562, Staphylococcus albus (S. albus) CICC 10897, and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) ATCC 6538, indicating the antibacterial potential of these flavonoids with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranging from 800 to 3200 μg/mL. Lu et al. [96] extracted peony flavonoids from Fengdan peony seed meal, which demonstrated moderate antibacterial activity, with MICs of 29.3, 117.2, 234.4, and 7500 μg/mL against S. aureus, Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis), B. subtilis, and Bacillus perfringens (B. perfringens), respectively. Wang et al. [97] extracted flavonoids from Sedum aizoon L. that were capable of inducing the disruption of the ultrastructural integrity of the fungus Botrytis cinerea, causing leakage of intracellular macromolecules such as nucleic acids and exerting antimicrobial effects by accumulating malondialdehyde and reactive oxygen species (ROS).

2.2. Single Flavonoids

To accurately assess their inhibitory effects on different bacterial strains, researchers began to focus on single flavonoids. This provides a scientific basis for developing new antibiotics, with a precise mechanism of action.

2.2.1. Flavones

Apigenin and luteolin are flavones widely distributed in various plants, including sweet red pepper, parsley, chamomile, celery, and Ginkgo biloba, and have good antibacterial activity [98]. Yuh et al. [26] found that the MIC of apigenin against quinolone-resistant S. aureus Mu50 was 4 μg/mL, while the MIC against quinolone-susceptible S. aureus FDA 209P exceeded 128 μg/mL. Further research revealed that apigenin gained enhanced activity with the progression of quinolone resistance. Conversely, Mahamud et al. [99] found that luteolin could effectively inhibit the growth of E. coli and S. typhimurium. Luteolin enters the cells quickly by disrupting cell membrane integrity. Simultaneously, exogenous ROS enter the cell, causing oxidative damage, affecting the respiratory chain function and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) metabolism, and ultimately leading to bacterial death. Additionally, luteolin can completely inhibit pathogenic biofilm formation by preventing irreversible bacterial adhesion and reducing the cell surface hydrophobicity.

2.2.2. Flavonols

Kaverol, rutin, baicalein, and quercetin are common flavonols found in saffron, scutellaria, lettuce, apples, and tea [98]. Research has revealed that quercetin exhibits good antibacterial effects against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, and S. aureus., demonstrating particularly higher sensitivity to Gram-positive bacteria, with MICs of 2.48, 2.57, 2.18, and 2.06 μg/mL, respectively. Treatment with quercetin has been found to cause cellular damage to both E. coli and S. aureus, leading to the disruption of their cell walls and membranes and ultimately resulting in leakage of intracellular enzymes, including β-galactosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and soluble proteins [100]. Moreover, quercetin has demonstrated good antibacterial activity against the plant pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in vitro, with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 14.83 μg/mL, which is more effective than the organocopper broad-spectrum bactericide thiodiazole copper [101]. Baicalein, a flavonoid compound similar to quercetin, has also demonstrated certain antimicrobial activity. Wang et al. [102] found that baicalein can adhere to the cytoplasmic membrane phospholipids and the outer membrane lipopolysaccharides of Gram-negative bacteria (Acinetobacter baumannii), resulting in membrane rupture. Additionally, baicalein can increase ROS production within A. baumannii, inhibiting efflux pump activity and preventing bacterial biofilm formation, thereby enhancing doxycycline activity against A. baumannii. Baicalin, the glycoside form of baicalein composed of baicalein and glucuronic acid, exhibits certain antibacterial activity by destroying the cell wall and membrane integrity of E. coli (MIC for E. coli clinical isolates: 4000 μg/mL). Furthermore, baicalin has been found to enhance the susceptibility of E. coli isolates to antimicrobial agents such as streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, and ampicillin [103]. In addition to quercetin, baicalein, and baicalin, naringin, rutin, and kaempferol have certain antibacterial activity. Ivanov et al. [58] revealed that both naringin and rutin demonstrated certain antimicrobial activity against ten selected antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. Notably, rutin has been found to reduce the ability of P. aeruginosa IBRS P001 to form biofilms. Li et al. [101] investigated the antimicrobial effects of 50 flavonoids on plant pathogenic bacteria and discovered that most of these compounds have moderate inhibitory effects on Xanthomonas oryzae and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Specifically, kaempferol demonstrated moderate antimicrobial activity against X. oryzae in vitro, with an EC50 of 15.91 μg/mL.

2.2.3. Flavanones

Naringin is a flavanone compound mainly found in citrus fruits [104]. Agus et al. [105] isolated naringin-rich parts from pigeon pea leaves and investigated their antibacterial effects against S. typhi, S. aureus, and E. coli through the paper diffusion method (Kirby–Bauer), revealing certain antibacterial activity against all tested bacteria, with an antibacterial zone diameter of 12.5, 11.0, and 9.5 mm, respectively. Yue et al. [65] found that the MIC of naringenin against S. mutans ranged from 100 and 200 μg/mL, with the growth curve demonstrating that both concentrations could significantly inhibit S. mutans growth. Additionally, 200 μg/mL naringin almost completely inhibited the biofilm formation by S. mutans. In addition, Zengin et al. [106] showed that naringenin had certain antibacterial activity against the clinically isolated strain S. aureus 105 with a MIC of 512 μg/mL. Weng et al. [72] found that sophoraflavanone G and matrone, two lavandulylated flavonoids in Sophora flavences, damaged the membrane integrity of S. aureus by targeting its bacterial membrane while inhibiting cell wall synthesis and preventing bacterial biofilm formation. These flavonoids also interfered with the energy metabolism of resistant S. aureus, hence demonstrating a bactericidal effect by impairing the normal physiological activities of bacteria. In addition to the aforementioned flavonoid compounds, pinocembrin and 7-O-methyleriodictyol also belong to the flavanones class and exhibit certain antibacterial activity against a variety of bacteria.

2.2.4. Flavanols

Flavanols are 3-hydroxyl derivatives of flavones. They include the simplest monomers, catechins and epicatechins, as well as more complex structures like gallatechin, epigallocatechin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and proanthocyanidins, among others. These compounds are typically found in black and green teas and in fruits such as bananas, peaches, blueberries, and apples. They exhibit certain inhibitory effects against various bacteria [98]. Alkufeidy et al. [107] observed S. aureus treated with catechin extract from green tea by scanning electron microscopy and found that the bacterial cell membrane and cell wall morphological structure were damaged, resulting in cell disruption.
The EGCG isolated from green tea by Sakanaka et al. [76] completely inhibited the growth and adhesion of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) on human buccal epithelial cells at a concentration of 250–500 μg/mL. Further studies revealed that this inhibitory effect was attributed to the presence of gallic groups in polyphenols linked to the 3-OH ester bond of catechins. Wang et al. [77] found that EGCG could not only damage the cell membrane of Vibrio parahemolyticus 17,802 (V. parahemolyticus), compromising its integrity but also inhibiting exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation in V. parahemolyticus. Noor et al. [108] found that a higher concentration of EGCG and theaflavin 3,3′-dialimate could inhibit the growth of Clostridium perfringens. In the presence of 250 μg/mL gallatechin gallate, the bacteria elongated without DNA separation and diaphragm formation. Zhang et al. [109] found that EGCG has MIC of 400 μg/mL for Shigella flexneri (S. flexneri), which can interfere with bacterial protein formation and change bacterial morphology. In addition, EGCG can perform an antibacterial role by reducing the level of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and increasing the level of ROS in bacteria.

2.2.5. Anthocyanins

Cyanidin, pelargonidin, and peonidin are anthocyanins responsible for the coloration of fruits and blossoms, predominantly found in the outer cell layers of many fruits, including red grapes, raspberries, strawberries, blueberries, cranberries, and blackberries [98]. Li et al. [110] found that the MIC of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) to both S. aureus and E. coli strains was less than 5000 μg/mL. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside-lauric acid ester (C3G-LA) (MIC: 312.5 μg/mL) had stronger antibacterial activity against S. aureus strains than C3G, but the inhibitory effect on E. coli was the same as C3G. They effectively suppressed bacterial growth by destroying their cell membranes. Gong et al. [111] found that the MIC of cranberry anthocyanins against S. aureus was 5000 μg/mL, and treating bacteria with MIC of 2 for 0.5 h suppressed approximately 8 log CFU/mL of S. aureus due to decreased ATP and soluble protein levels, membrane structure damage, and cytoplasmic leakage. The anthocyanins extracted from pomegranate by Wafa et al. [112] had antibacterial effects on Salmonella, with MIC of 10,750–12,500 μg/mL. This concentration of anthocyanins significantly inhibited the growth of salmonella in chicken stored at 4 °C. Lacombe et al. [113] extracted anthocyanins from lowbush blueberries, with MIC of 34,750 μg/mL against S. typhimurium and a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 69,500 μg/mL. Compared to other categories of flavonoids, anthocyanins exhibit poorer antibacterial activity.

2.2.6. Isoflavones

Genistein is an isoflavone which is mainly found in legumes such as soybeans [114]. Verdrengh et al. [82] found that the growth of Streptococcus pasteurianus (S. pasteurianus, Bacillus cereus (B. cereus)), and S. aureus strains LS-1, SKM 7 (srtB), SKM 12 (srtA-), SKM 14 (srtA-srtB-) and Newman was reduced 2- to 160-fold by the addition of 27.024 μg/mL genistein. This indicates that genistein has a good inhibitory effect on these bacteria. Formononetin is also an isoflavone compound with a good inhibitory effect against bacteria and fungi. Das Neves et al. [85] found that isoflavone formononetin extracted from red propolis had certain activity against all tested microorganisms, with MIC values of 200 μg/mL for six types of bacteria (S. aureus ATCC 13150, S. aureus ATCC 25923, S. epidermides ATCC 12228, P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027, P. aeruginosa ATCC P-12, and P. aeruginosa ATCC P-03). Hummelova et al. [115] found that biochanin A exhibits good antibacterial activity against B. cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Streptococcus pyogenes, with MICs ranging from 32 to 64 μg/mL. In addition to the aforementioned compounds, research has also found that several isoflavones, including orobol, gancaonin A, wighteone, millewanin H, furowanin A, senegalensin, and furowanin B7, exhibit certain antibacterial activity against the clinical strain Streptococcus iniae (S. iniae) DSJ19. Their MICs range from 7.81 to 500 µg/mL, while their MBCs range from 15.63 to 500 µg/mL [116].
The above studies have found that many flavonoids exhibit certain inhibitory effects against various bacteria and fungi, but their inhibitory effects and mechanisms against different pathogens vary significantly. Compared to traditional antibacterial agents, some flavonoids demonstrate stronger antibacterial activity, which provides a potential research direction for the development of novel antimicrobial drugs.

3. Antibacterial Mechanism of Flavonoids

Flavonoids inhibit bacteria in various ways, including destroying their cell wall and membrane structures, affecting their normal morphology, inhibiting nucleic acid and protein synthesis or function, inhibiting biofilm formation, downregulating virulence factor expression, interfering with bacterial signal transduction, and inhibiting bacterial efflux pump (Figure 2).

3.1. Bacterial Cell Membrane Disruption

Cell membranes are the primary target sites of natural flavonoids against Gram-positive bacteria, including the disruption of the phospholipid bilayer and the inhibition of the respiratory chain by targeting quinone pools [62,117]. Studies have found that 128 μg/mL of quercetin can damage cell membrane integrity of amoxicillin-resistant S. epidermidis, leading to the leakage of bacterial DNA, RNA, and metabolites, thus affecting the normal growth of bacteria. Additionally, quercetin can enhance the inhibitory effect of amoxicillin on amoxicillin-resistant S. epidermidis by inhibiting β-lactamase activity [43]. Similarly to quercetin, kaempferol and EGCG can affect the normal growth of bacteria by disrupting cell membrane integrity. For instance, studies have found that kaempferol can kill Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) by disrupting their cell membrane integrity. Kaempferol treatment increased the expression levels of H. pylori ABC transporters 1–4 and lolD 2 by a thousand-fold, indicating that the kaempferol-induced cell membrane damage in H. pylori may be related to these transporters [118]. Wang et al. [77] found that 256 μg/mL of EGCG could significantly disrupt cell membrane integrity in V. parahemolyticus 17,802, allowing propidium iodide to penetrate the bacteria and emit red fluorescence. Besides the above flavonoids, many other flavonoids can disrupt bacterial cell membrane integrity, resulting in leakage of internal proteins, nucleic acids, sodium ions, potassium ions, and other substances, ultimately resulting in bacterial death [119,120].

3.2. Bacterial Cell Wall Disruption

The cell wall is essential for bacterial growth, survival, and morphological maintenance. When the cell wall is disrupted, bacteria can easily rupture and die [121]. Liang et al. [122] found that dihydromyricetin is the most abundant flavonoid in vine tea extract, and S. aureus treatment with 1 MIC (6300 μg/mL and 1250 μg/mL, respectively) of vine tea extract and dihydromyricetin increased the extracellular alkaline phosphatase (AKP) concentration by 21.8% and 10.3%, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy revealed severe damage to the S. aureus cell wall, with blurred boundaries and bacteria autolysis after 12 h of treatment. Zhou et al. [123] found that flavonoids from Chimonanthus salicifolius S. Y. Hu. (with an MIC of 1560 μg/mL) exhibited a stronger inhibitory effect on Gram-positive bacteria than on Gram-negative bacteria. After 6 h of treatment, the extracellular AKP level in S. aureus was 6.97 times higher than that in the control group. Moreover, ultrastructural observations following bacterial treatment with flavonoids from salicylus flower revealed an irregular bacterial shape and cytoplasmic leakage, indicating disruption of cell wall integrity.

3.3. Impact on Bacterial Nucleic Acid

Nucleic acid plays a crucial role in bacterial growth and proliferation. Some flavonoids can interfere with the bacterial DNA/RNA replication and transcription process, causing changes in gene expression, and eventually, bacterial death. Kim et al. [63] found that hesperidin treatment decreased the mRNA expression levels of H. pylori replication-related genes (dnaE, dnaN, dnaQ, holB) and transcription-related genes (rpoA, rpoB, rpoD, and rpoN). The results indicated that hesperidin inhibited H. pylori growth by downregulating the replication and transcription of growth-related essential genes. Wang et al. [124] found that 28 h of treatment with soybean isoflavone reduced the fluorescence intensity of 4′,6-diaminidine 2-phenylindole by 60.18% in the S. aureus cell compared to the untreated control group, and the nucleic acid synthesis was significantly inhibited. Further studies revealed that soybean isoflavone inhibits the normal growth of bacteria by simultaneously acting on topoisomerases I and II to prevent nucleic acid synthesis. Morimoto et al. [26] found that apigenin targets the function of gyrA (a subunit encoding DNA gyrase) subunit with Ser84Leu mutation, inhibiting the quinolone-resistant S. aureus growth that carries a mutation in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the gyrA gene.

3.4. Proteins Affecting Bacteria

Some flavonoids can inhibit protein synthesis or bacterial function, such as inhibiting the activity of specific enzymes or interacting with target proteins, thereby blocking the protein synthesis and modification process, resulting in bacterial death. Griep et al. [52] found that myricetin inhibited the activities of E. coli DNA helicase and primers, and its sensitivity to DNA helicase was significantly higher than that of primers. Geethalakshmi et al. [125] found that flavonoids extracted from Trianthema decandra can interact with target proteins through four different amino acids, including glycine58 (GLY58), arginine98 (ARG98), selenomethionine56 (MSE56), and glutamic63 (GLU63). Their binding to P. aeruginosa dehydrase (FabZ) inhibits the enzyme’s activity, thereby affecting bacterial growth. S. aureus PriA is a helicase essential for restarting DNA replication and bacterial survival. Huang et al. [126] identified through the fluorescence quenching method that kaempferol could combine with PriA to form a complex and significantly inhibit PriA activity. Furthermore, certain flavonoids can inhibit enzyme activity by interfering with the binding of cofactors. Studies have shown that EGCG disrupts the cofactor NAD(P)H binding in both enzymes, effectively suppressing the FabG and FabI reductase steps in the bacterial fatty acid elongation cycle. This inhibition consequently blocks the bacterial type II fatty acid synthesis system, ultimately impairing bacterial growth [127].

3.5. Inhibition of Bacterial Biofilms

As a complex microbial assemblage, a biofilm is a group behavior of bacteria adapting to the environment to enhance their tolerance to the external environment and cause microbial infection, which can be difficult to eradicate. Biofilms pose a serious threat to human and animal health; therefore, inhibiting or eradicating them is crucial for inhibiting bacterial infection [128]. Wang et al. [129] found that the subinhibitory concentration of baicalin (250 μg/mL) downregulates the mRNA transcription levels of genes srtA, uafA, and Aas related to autolysis and surface protein production of azithromycin-resistant S. saprophyticus (ARSS), reducing ARSS surface protein production and eDNA release and causing bacterial autolysis. Additionally, baicalin can reduce the aggregation rate of bacteria in a dose-dependent manner, thereby inhibiting biofilm formation in ARSS, with a stronger inhibition effect in the adhesion and aggregation stages than in the mature stage of biofilm formation. Ivanov et al. [58] found that 500 and 250 μg/mL of rutin could significantly inhibit (100%) biofilm formation in urinary catheters of P. aeruginosa and MRSA. The removal rate of MBC rutin on P. aeruginosa and MRSA biofilms was 73.7% and 74.2%, respectively. Its inhibitory effect on biofilms was achieved by reducing cell viability, extracellular polysaccharide, and extracellular DNA levels. Qayyum et al. [130] found that quercetin could inhibit biofilm formation in Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), with an inhibition rate proportional to the quercetin concentration; 64 μg/mL of quercetin could reduce the depth of the biofilm. Zhang et al. [109] found that 200 μg/mL of EGCG exhibited a 64.28% inhibition rate on the biofilm of S. flexneri. Its mechanism of action is to reduce the production of bacterial exopolysaccharides by inhibiting the mdoH gene expression, thereby affecting biofilm formation.

3.6. Inhibition of Bacteria-Related Virulence Factors

Bacterial virulence factors refer to the toxins, enzymes, and cell surface structures secreted by bacteria, such as lipopolysaccharides and lipoproteins, which can enhance their ability to evade host defense and cause diseases [131]. Xu et al. [42] found that kaempferol not only interferes with the pore-forming activity of PLY by binding to the catalytic active site, thereby inhibiting PLY-mediated cytotoxicity, but also significantly reduces the activity of sorting enzyme A by occupying its active site. Additionally, Yin et al. [132] found that kaempferol could inhibit α-hemolysin expression by downregulating Hla and RNAIII transcription, significantly inhibiting the hemolytic ability of S. aureus. Besides kaempferol, puerarin and rutin can inhibit the production of bacterial virulence factors. Tang et al. [133] found that puerarin exhibited a slight effect on the S. aureus growth; however, at a low dose of 8 μg/mL puerarin, the Hla expression was inhibited, and the production of bacterial α-hemolysin was significantly reduced. Ivanov et al. [58] found that 0.5 MIC of rutin could significantly reduce the production of extracellular virulence factors of P. aeruginosa IBRS P001. Compared with the control group, the production of elastase, anthocyanin, and rhamnolipid decreased by 91%, 82.1%, and 74.4%, respectively, and the production of protease decreased by >50%.

3.7. Effects on Bacterial Signaling Pathways

The bacterial signaling pathway is a series of molecular mechanisms in which bacteria respond to changes in the external environment. These mechanisms enable bacteria to quickly adapt to environmental changes to maintain their survival and reproduction ability. These signaling pathways mainly include quorum sensing (QS), different types of secretion systems (such as type I, II, III, and IV secretion systems), and metabolic signaling pathways.
Peng et al. [134] studied the effect of rutin on the QS system of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC), revealing that rutin not only inhibited bacterial biofilm formation by reducing the secretion of signaling molecule autoinducer-2 (AI-2), but also significantly interfered with its QS by reducing the expression of APEC virulence gene. Lahiri et al. [135] found that catechins could significantly reduce the activity of QS protein LuxS of P. gingivalis. Nain et al. [136] found that quercetin and myricetin in the leaf extract of Gynura procumbens could interact with QS receptors LasR and RhlR of P. aeruginosa, thereby affecting bacterial QS. Zong et al. [137] found that baicalin dose-dependently downregulated the luxS expression in pork–enteral pathogenic E. coli and reduced the production of the QS signaling molecule AI-2, thus affecting the bacterial population dynamics. Chang et al. [138] found that chrysin not only competes with the natural signaling molecule C6HSL for the same binding site on the CviR receptor, but can also change its secondary structure, significantly preventing the binding of C6HSL/CviR and inhibiting bacterial QS. Zhang et al. [139] found that baicalin inhibits the type III secretion system (T3SS) through the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS) system, significantly reducing the production of virulence factors in P. aeruginosa and weakening its toxicity. Lv et al. [140] found that myricetin not only inhibited the expression of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) effector proteins sipA, sipB, and sipC, but also significantly reduced the levels of hilA, sopA, sicA, and prgH proteins, which are primarily responsible for the secretion, regulation, and function of SPI-1-effector proteins. Further investigation revealed that the mRNA transcription levels of hilD, hilC, and rtsA and downstream genes in Salmonella were significantly reduced under induction conditions when myricetin was absent. This indicates that myricetin affects the transcription level of the SPI-1 gene through the hilD-hilC-rstA-hilA regulatory pathway, thereby reducing the level of the key effector protein of S. typhimurium and inhibiting its T3SS-mediated virulence.
The above studies demonstrate that various flavonoids can affect bacterial signaling pathways, thereby affecting the normal growth of bacteria.

3.8. Inhibition of Bacterial Efflux Pump

Bacterial efflux pumps are complex systems that play crucial roles in bacterial physiology, metabolism, and pathogenicity. Inhibiting these pumps can significantly reduce bacterial resistance and restore their sensitivity to antibiotics. Lan et al. [141] found that five flavonoids extracted from Artemisia rupestris L. exhibited no inhibitory effect on MRSA when used alone (MIC > 128 μg/mL). However, when combined with antibiotics, they reduced the NorA expression at the mRNA level, thereby inhibiting the efflux pump in different MRSA strains. Zou et al. [142] found that biochanin A could act as an efflux pump inhibitor that not only inhibits the synthesis of ABC transporter, but also the NorA gene transcription. Wang et al. [143] found that silybin inhibited the MRSA efflux system by reducing the expression of NorA and QacA/B, thereby destroying MRSA resistance to antibiotics. Alves Borges Leal et al. [144] found that synthetic chalcones significantly reduced the MIC of ethylquinoline bromide and norfloxacin against drug-resistant golden grape balls by inhibiting the activity of the NorA efflux pump.

4. Antibacterial Activity of Flavonoids Combined with Antibiotics

Studies have shown that flavonoids have a synergistic effect with antibiotics, and can enhance the inhibitory effect of antibiotics on bacteria (Table 2). The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) is commonly used to evaluate the combined effects of antibiotics and other drugs. When the FICI ≤ 0.5, it indicates that the combined effect of the two drugs is significantly better than their individual effects, suggesting a synergistic interaction between the drugs [145]. Yi et al. [146] found that the combination of naringenin and amikacin had a synergistic effect on E. coli ATCC 25922 and C7F3, which with the FICIs was 0.3125 and 0.1875, respectively. Naringenin and amikacin exert this synergistic inhibitory effect by disrupting the integrity of bacterial cell walls and membranes, leading to the leakage of cell contents. Lan et al. [141] found that chrysosplenetin, penduletin, and chrysoeriol exhibited synergistic activity when combined with norfloxacin against effluxing fluoroquinolone-resistant strain SA1199B, with FICIs of 0.375, 0.079, and 0.266, respectively. This synergistic effect is attributed to the inhibition of bacterial efflux systems by flavonoids, preventing the bacteria from expelling the antibiotics that enter their cells, thereby allowing the antibiotics to effectively kill the bacteria. Bakar et al. [147] found that flavones significantly enhanced the inhibitory effect of oxacillin on vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) ATCC 700699 in a concentration-dependent manner. The FICI for the combination of flavones and nafcillin was 0.126. Cheng et al. [148] found that baicalin enhanced the damage of colistin to the bacterial cell membrane by inhibiting the activity of the bacterial efflux pump, thus playing a synergistic antibacterial role with colistin. When colistin was combined with baicalin (1024 μg/mL), mcr-1 positive E. coli strains recovered their sensitivity to colistin. Eumkeb et al. [56]. have demonstrated that galangin exhibits a notable synergistic effect when combined with ceftazidime. Galangin significantly inhibits the activity of penicillinase and β-lactamase, thereby reversing bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Zhong et al. [149] discovered that 7,8-dihydroxyflavone, myricetin, and luteolin can significantly enhance the antibacterial efficacy of colistin. Further studies revealed that these flavonoids disrupt bacterial iron homeostasis by converting ferric iron to ferrous iron. The accumulation of excessive intracellular ferrous iron modulates the membrane charge of bacteria by interfering with the two-component system pmrA/pmrB, thereby promoting the binding of colistin and subsequent membrane damage.
In addition to the above flavonoids, quercetin [150,151,152,153,154], rutin [155,156], apigenin [157], luteolin [158,159,160], isoquercitrin [161], catechins [162], genistein [163], chrysin [164], EGCG [117,165,166,167], and other flavonoids can enhance the antibacterial effect of antibiotics, and the methods used in these studies are different, but FICI analysis shows that the combination of these flavonoids and antibiotics has a synergistic antibacterial effect.
Despite extensive evidence demonstrating the synergistic effects of flavonoids with antibiotics, it is important to note that flavonoids may also exhibit antagonistic interactions under certain conditions. For instance, hesperetin and naringenin, which exhibit antibacterial activity against both methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), have been shown to have their antibacterial effects counteracted when combined with β-lactam antibiotics such as methicillin, penicillin, and oxacillin [168]. These antagonistic effects highlight the complexity of flavonoid-antibiotic interactions, which can be influenced by various factors, including bacterial species, antibiotic mechanisms of action, and flavonoid concentrations. Therefore, careful evaluation of flavonoid–antibiotic combinations is essential to avoid potential antagonism that could compromise therapeutic efficacy.
Table 2. Part of the synergistic effect of flavonoids and antibiotics.
Table 2. Part of the synergistic effect of flavonoids and antibiotics.
MICs (μg/mL)
StrainsAgentsAloneCombinationFICIReferences
S. aureus 1199BChrysosplenetin>25632 <0.375 [141]
Norfloxacin328
Penduletin>1282<0.079
Norfloxacin322
Chrysoeriol >1282<0.266
Norfloxacin328
E.coli C7F3Naringenin20002500.1875[146]
Amikacin644
S. aureus ATCC 700699 Flavone 16001000.094[147]
Vancomycin80.25
Flavone16001000.126
Oxacillin80050
E. coli HZ−46 Baicalin >2048 2560.25[148]
Colistin 20.25
Aeromonas hydrophila (A. hydrophila)Quercetin360900.28[9]
Florfenicol 2.50.078
P. aeruginosa O1 Quercetin50062.50.25[150]
Tobramycin40.5
Quercetin50062.50.25
Amikacin81
Quercetin5001250.375
Ceftriaxone81
Quercetin5001250.375
Gentamycin40.5
Quercetin5001250.375
Levofloxacin20.25
Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) ColR-Ab4 Quercetin256160.1875[152]
Colistin 324
S. aureus ATCC33591Quercetin>102440.5[154]
Tetracycline3216
Quercetin>102440.25
Doxycycline328
MRSA Apigenin 32.5–62.5 /0.18–0.47[157]
Ampicillin 800107
Apigenin 32.5–62.5/0.18–0.47
Ceftriaxone 582.6
A. hydrophila MTCC 646Rutin11002750.5[155]
Florfenicol164
S. aureus ATCC 25923 Luteolin 62.53.90.125[159]
Ampicillin 15.630.97
E.coli DMST 20661 Luteolin 20080<0.47
Amoxicillin>100070
A. baumannii Chrysin >1281–80.047–0.256[163]
Colistin0.125–160.031–0.125
P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii Kaempferol ≥5124–160.031–0.266[164]
Colistin 32–1281–16
Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) N16961 Vibrio cholerae EGCG 1250.970.009[165]
Tetracycline 3.910.004
MDR E.coli, S. aureus EGCG 625–125078.125–156.250.325[166]
Gentamicin 326.4
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase E.coli EGCG 1500500.1[167]
Cefotaxime 1288

5. Conclusions

This review summarizes the individual antibacterial activity of flavonoids, their combined antibacterial effects with antibiotics, and their underlying antibacterial mechanisms. Among the various subclasses of flavonoids, flavones, flavonols, and flavanones encompass a greater number of compounds with good antibacterial activity compared to flavanols, anthocyanins, and isoflavones. Furthermore, when flavonoids are combined with different antibiotics, they can exert synergistic effects, enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of the antibiotics. Notably, the combinations of penduletin with norfloxacin, quercetin with colistin, and EGCG with tetracycline demonstrate particularly remarkable synergistic effects which warrant further investigation. Additionally, this review discusses the antibacterial mechanisms of flavonoids, including the disruption of bacterial cell membranes and cell walls, interference with bacterial nucleic acids and proteins, inhibition of biofilm formation and virulence factor production, modulation of bacterial signaling pathways, and suppression of bacterial efflux systems. We found that many flavonoids exert their antibacterial effects through multiple mechanisms of action. For example, quercetin, a representative flavonol, not only compromises bacterial integrity, but also inhibits bacterial enzyme functions and virulence factor production. The diversity of these mechanisms contributes to reducing the development of bacterial resistance.
These findings suggest that flavonoids may play a crucial role in the development of novel antibacterial agents and combination therapies to address the growing challenge of antibiotic resistance. However, many of these compounds have only been tested in vitro. Their antibacterial efficacy needs to be further validated in vivo to assess their effectiveness and safety in complex biological environments. Furthermore, in-depth research into the pharmacological mechanisms, toxicological profiles, and potential resistance issues of these compounds is necessary to provide a solid scientific foundation for their future clinical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. (Zhijin Zhang), M.C. and Z.S.; methodology, Z.Z. (Zhijin Zhang), M.C. and Z.S.; investigation, Z.Z. (Zhijin Zhang), J.X. and X.C.; resources, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhu) and X.W.; data curation, Z.Z. (Zhijin Zhang), M.C. and W.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z. (Zhijin Zhang); writing—review and editing, Y.B., Jiyu Zhang and Z.Z. (Zhen Zhu); supervision, X.Z., Y.B., J.Z. and Z.Z. (Zhen Zhu); funding acquisition, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhu), Y.B. and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Plan Project of Gansu Province [Science and Technology Department of Gansu Province, grant number 24JRRA028]; the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [Science and Technology Department of Hebei Province, grant number C2024402032]; the Key Research and Development Projects of Hebei [Science and Technology Department of Hebei Province, grant number 22326617D]; the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, grant number 1610322024016]; the Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, grant number 25-LZIHPS-05]; and the earmarked fund for CARS [Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, grant number CARS-37].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the participants for their support during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Song, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Hao, Z.; Ding, S.; Panichayupakaranant, P.; Zhu, K.; Shen, J. Plant Natural Flavonoids Against Multidrug Resistant Pathogens. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, e2100749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Adedeji, W.A. The treasure called antibiotics. Ann. Ib. Postgrad. Med. 2016, 14, 56–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Sessa, R. Editorial for the Special Issue “Antibacterial Activity of Drug-Resistant Strains”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Parums, D.V. Editorial: The Global Threats of Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance Require New Approaches to Drug Development, Including Molecular Antimicrobial Adjuvants. Med. Sci. Monit. 2024, 30, e945583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baquero, F. Threats of Antibiotic Resistance: An Obliged Reappraisal. Int. Microbiol. 2021, 24, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Natural Products to Drugs: Natural Product Derived Compounds in Clinical Trials—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15806196/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
  8. Cowan, M.M. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhao, X.; Cui, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Li, L.; Kong, X. Synergistic Effect of Quercetin on Antibacterial Activity of Florfenicol Against Aeromonas Hydrophila In Vitro and In Vivo. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, M.-Y.; Kang, D.-H. Antibacterial Activity of Caffeic Acid Combined with UV-A Light against Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0063121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Sun, S.; Feng, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; Ma, J.; Zhou, F. Tannic Acid-Crosslinked O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogels for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity and Rapid Hemostasis. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2023, 34, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, K.; Zhong, W.; Li, P.; Ren, J.; Jiang, K.; Wu, W. Antibacterial Mechanism of Lignin and Lignin-Based Antimicrobial Materials in Different Fields. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 252, 126281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alejo-Armijo, A.; Cobo, A.; Alejo-Armijo, A.; Altarejos, J.; Salido, S.; Ortega-Morente, E. Evaluation of Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Phenolics with Coumarin, Naphthoquinone and Pyranone Moieties Against Foodborne Microorganisms. Molecules 2025, 30, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hatano, T.; Kusuda, M.; Inada, K.; Ogawa, T.; Shiota, S.; Tsuchiya, T.; Yoshida, T. Effects of Tannins and Related Polyphenols on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2047–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tangney, C.C.; Rasmussen, H.E. Polyphenols, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2013, 15, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Farhadi, F.; Khameneh, B.; Iranshahi, M.; Iranshahy, M. Antibacterial Activity of Flavonoids and Their Structure-Activity Relationship: An Update Review. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 13–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rengasamy, K.R.; Khan, H.; Gowrishankar, S.; Lagoa, R.J.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Khan, Z.; Suroowan, S.; Tewari, D.; Zengin, G.; Hassan, S.T.; et al. The Role of Flavonoids in Autoimmune Diseases: Therapeutic Updates. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 194, 107–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cai, J.; Tan, X.; Hu, Q.; Pan, H.; Zhao, M.; Guo, C.; Zeng, J.; Ma, X.; Zhao, Y. Flavonoids and Gastric Cancer Therapy: From Signaling Pathway to Therapeutic Significance. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2024, 18, 3233–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Szala-Rycaj, J.; Zagaja, M.; Szewczyk, A.; Andres-Mach, M. Selected Flavonoids and Their Role in the Treatment of Epilepsy—A Review of the Latest Reports from Experimental Studies. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2021, 81, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nicolucci, C.; Padovani, M.; Rodrigues, F.d.C.; Fritsch, L.N.; Santos, A.C.; Priolli, D.G.; Sciani, J.M. Flavonoids: The Use in Mental Health and Related Diseases. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 38, 4223–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, M.; Ge, X.; Xua, H.; Ma, K.; Zhang, W.; Zan, Y.; Efferth, T.; Xue, Z.; Hua, X. Phytochemicals with Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytomedicine 2022, 100, 154073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eumkeb, G.; Siriwong, S.; Phitaktim, S.; Rojtinnakorn, N.; Sakdarat, S. Synergistic Activity and Mode of Action of Flavonoids Isolated from Smaller Galangal and Amoxicillin Combinations against Amoxicillin-Resistant Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xie, Y.; Yang, W.; Tang, F.; Chen, X.; Ren, L. Antibacterial Activities of Flavonoids: Structure-Activity Relationship and Mechanism. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Biharee, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, A.; Jaitak, V. Antimicrobial Flavonoids as a Potential Substitute for Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance. Fitoterapia 2020, 146, 104720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shamsudin, N.F.; Ahmed, Q.U.; Mahmood, S.; Ali Shah, S.A.; Khatib, A.; Mukhtar, S.; Alsharif, M.A.; Parveen, H.; Zakaria, Z.A. Antibacterial Effects of Flavonoids and Their Structure-Activity Relationship Study: A Comparative Interpretation. Molecules 2022, 27, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Morimoto, Y.; Baba, T.; Sasaki, T.; Hiramatsu, K. Apigenin as an Anti-Quinolone-Resistance Antibiotic. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2015, 46, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Morimoto, Y.; Aiba, Y.; Miyanaga, K.; Hishinuma, T.; Cui, L.; Baba, T.; Hiramatsu, K. CID12261165, a Flavonoid Compound as Antibacterial Agents against Quinolone-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, D.; Gao, X.; Song, X.; Zhou, W.; Hong, W.; Tian, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M. Luteolin Showed a Resistance Elimination Effect on Gentamicin by Decreasing MATE mRNA Expression in Trueperella Pyogenes. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, C.; Huang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Liao, K.; Su, W. Pithecellobium Clypearia Extract Enriched in Gallic Acid and Luteolin Has Antibacterial Activity against MRSA and Reduces Resistance to Erythromycin, Ceftriaxone Sodium and Levofloxacin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 848–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Metwaly, A.M.; Saleh, M.M.; Alsfouk, B.A.; Ibrahim, I.M.; Abd-Elraouf, M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.H. Anti-Virulence Potential of Patuletin, a Natural Flavone, against Staphylococcus aureus: In Vitro and In Silico Investigations. Heliyon 2024, 10, e24075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Qiu, J.; Dong, J.; Li, H.; Luo, M.; Dai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Leng, B.; Niu, X.; Zhao, S.; et al. Chrysin Protects Mice from Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 1551–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.-Y.; Sun, Z.-L.; Liu, T.; Gibbons, S.; Zhang, W.-J.; Qing, M. Flavonoids from Sophora moorcroftiana and Their Synergistic Antibacterial Effects on MRSA. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, T.; Zang, X.; He, M.; Pan, S.; Xu, X. Structure-Activity Relationship of Flavonoids on Their Anti-Escherichia coli Activity and Inhibition of DNA Gyrase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8185–8190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, S.; Lv, Q.; Sun, X.; Tang, T.; Deng, X.; Yin, Y.; Li, L. Acacetin Inhibits Streptococcus pneumoniae Virulence by Targeting Pneumolysin. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tan, C.-X.; Schrader, K.K.; Khan, I.A.; Rimando, A.M. Activities of Wogonin Analogs and Other Flavones against Flavobacterium Columnare. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, Y.; Lv, H.; Xu, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Fang, T.; Deng, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, D. In Vitro and in Vivo Activities of Scutellarein, a Novel Polyphosphate Kinase 1 Inhibitor against Acinetobacter baumannii Infection. Microb. Cell Fact. 2024, 23, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dzoyem, J.P.; Melong, R.; Tsamo, A.T.; Tchinda, A.T.; Kapche, D.G.W.F.; Ngadjui, B.T.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. Cytotoxicity, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Eight Compounds Isolated from Entada abyssinica (Fabaceae). BMC Res. Notes 2017, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dzotam, J.K.; Simo, I.K.; Bitchagno, G.; Celik, I.; Sandjo, L.P.; Tane, P.; Kuete, V. In Vitro Antibacterial and Antibiotic Modifying Activity of Crude Extract, Fractions and 3′,4′,7-Trihydroxyflavone from Myristica Fragrans Houtt against MDR Gram-Negative Enteric Bacteria. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, J.S.; Kim, J.-H.; Rashan, L.; Kim, I.; Lee, W.; Kim, K.H. Potential Antimicrobial Activity of Galloyl-Flavonoid Glycosides From Woodfordia uniflora Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 784504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ming, D.; Wang, D.; Cao, F.; Xiang, H.; Mu, D.; Cao, J.; Li, B.; Zhong, L.; Dong, X.; Zhong, X.; et al. Kaempferol Inhibits the Primary Attachment Phase of Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guan, X.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, X.; Xiao, J.; He, L.; Li, J. Effects of Compounds Found in Nidus vespae on the Growth and Cariogenic Virulence Factors of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 167, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, L.; Fang, J.; Ou, D.; Xu, J.; Deng, X.; Chi, G.; Feng, H.; Wang, J. Therapeutic Potential of Kaempferol on Streptococcus pneumoniae Infection. Microbes Infect. 2023, 25, 105058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Siriwong, S.; Teethaisong, Y.; Thumanu, K.; Dunkhunthod, B.; Eumkeb, G. The Synergy and Mode of Action of Quercetin plus Amoxicillin against Amoxicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Holler, J.G.; Christensen, S.B.; Slotved, H.-C.; Rasmussen, H.B.; Guzman, A.; Olsen, C.-E.; Petersen, B.; Molgaard, P. Novel Inhibitory Activity of the Staphylococcus aureus NorA Efflux Pump by a Kaempferol Rhamnoside Isolated from Persea lingue Nees. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1138–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, L.; Li, B.; Si, X.; Liu, X.; Deng, X.; Niu, X.; Jin, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, J. Quercetin Protects Rats from Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Infections by Inhibiting Coagulase Activity. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 4808–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, P.; Kang, X.; Chen, X.; Luo, X.; Li, C.; Wang, G. Quercetin Targets SarA of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to Mitigate Biofilm Formation. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e02722-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jaisinghani, R.N. Antibacterial Properties of Quercetin. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 8, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kannan, S.; Balakrishnan, J.; Govindasamy, A.; Arunagiri, R. New Insights into the Antibacterial Mode of Action of Quercetin against Uropathogen Serratia Marcescens In-Vivo and in-Vitro. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Siriwong, S.; Thumanu, K.; Hengpratom, T.; Eumkeb, G. Synergy and Mode of Action of Ceftazidime plus Quercetin or Luteolin on Streptococcus pyogenes. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 759459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Green, A.E.; Rowlands, R.S.; Cooper, R.A.; Maddocks, S.E. The Effect of the Flavonol Morin on Adhesion and Aggregation of Streptococcus pyogenes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 333, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arima, H.; Ashida, H.; Danno, G. Rutin-Enhanced Antibacterial Activities of Flavonoids against Bacillus cereus and Salmonella enteritidis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Griep, M.A.; Blood, S.; Larson, M.A.; Koepsell, S.A.; Hinrichs, S.H. Myricetin Inhibits Escherichia coli DnaB Helicase but Not Primase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 7203–7208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, T.; Zhang, P.; Lv, H.; Deng, X.; Wang, J. A Natural Dietary Flavone Myricetin as an α-Hemolysin Inhibitor for Controlling Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kang, S.S.; Kim, J.-G.; Lee, T.-H.; Oh, K.-B. Flavonols Inhibit Sortases and Sortase-Mediated Staphylococcus aureus Clumping to Fibrinogen. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 1751–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Guo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, L.; Zhou, Y.; Jia, G.; Wei, L.; Yu, Q.; Wang, J. Metallo-β-Lactamases Inhibitor Fisetin Attenuates Meropenem Resistance in NDM-1-Producing Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 231, 114108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Eumkeb, G.; Sakdarat, S.; Siriwong, S. Reversing β-Lactam Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus with Galangin from Alpinia Officinarum Hance and Synergism with Ceftazidime. Phytomedicine 2010, 18, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tan, A.; Scortecci, K.C.; Cabral De Medeiros, N.M.; Kukula-Koch, W.; Butler, T.J.; Smith, S.M.; Boylan, F. Plukenetia Volubilis Leaves as Source of Anti-Helicobacter pylori Agents. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1461447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ivanov, M.; Novović, K.; Malešević, M.; Dinić, M.; Stojković, D.; Jovčić, B.; Soković, M. Polyphenols as Inhibitors of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria-Mechanisms Underlying Rutin Interference with Bacterial Virulence. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ruddock, P.S.; Charland, M.; Ramirez, S.; Lopez, A.; Towers, G.H.N.; Arnason, J.T.; Liao, M.; Dillon, J.-A.R. Antimicrobial Activity of Flavonoids From Piper lanceaefolium and Other Colombian Medicinal Plants Against Antibiotic Susceptible and Resistant Strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2011, 38, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gress-Antonio, C.D.; Rivero-Perez, N.; Marquina-Bahena, S.; Alvarez, L.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A.; Martinez-Juarez, V.M.; Sosa-Gutierrez, C.G.; Ocampo-Lopez, J.; Zepeda-Bastida, A.; Ojeda-Ramirez, D. Litsea Glaucescens Kuth Possesses Bactericidal Activity against Listeria monocytogenes. PeerJ 2023, 11, e16522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yarmolinsky, L.; Nakonechny, F.; Budovsky, A.; Zeigerman, H.; Khalfin, B.; Sharon, E.; Yarmolinsky, L.; Ben-Shabat, S.; Nisnevitch, M. Antimicrobial and Antiviral Compounds of Phlomis viscosa Poiret. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, L.; Yan, Y.; Zhu, J.; Xia, X.; Yuan, G.; Li, S.; Deng, B.; Luo, X. Quinone Pool, a Key Target of Plant Flavonoids Inhibiting Gram-Positive Bacteria. Molecules 2023, 28, 4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, H.W.; Woo, H.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Kim, J.-B.; Kim, S.-H. Hesperetin Inhibits Expression of Virulence Factors and Growth of Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Husain, F.M.; Perveen, K.; Abul Qais, F.; Ahmad, I.; Alfarhan, A.H.; El-Sheikh, M.A. Naringin Inhibits the Biofilms of Metallo-β-Lactamases (MβLs) Producing Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Camel Meat. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yue, J.; Yang, H.; Liu, S.; Song, F.; Guo, J.; Huang, C. Influence of Naringenin on the Biofilm Formation of Streptococcus mutans. J. Dent. 2018, 76, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xuewen, H.; Ping, O.; Zhongwei, Y.; Zhongqiong, Y.; Hualin, F.; Juchun, L.; Changliang, H.; Gang, S.; Zhixiang, Y.; Xu, S.; et al. Eriodictyol Protects against Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Lung Cell Injury by Inhibiting Alpha-Hemolysin Expression. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dai, X.-H.; Li, H.-E.; Lu, C.-J.; Wang, J.-F.; Dong, J.; Wei, J.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Tan, W.; Deng, X.-M.; et al. Liquiritigenin Prevents Staphylococcus aureus-Mediated Lung Cell Injury via Inhibiting the Production of α-Hemolysin. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 15, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gaur, R.; Gupta, V.K.; Singh, P.; Pal, A.; Darokar, M.P.; Bhakuni, R.S. Drug Resistance Reversal Potential of Isoliquiritigenin and Liquiritigenin Isolated from Glycyrrhiza Glabra Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1708–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zampini, I.C.; Villena, J.; Salva, S.; Herrera, M.; Isla, M.I.; Alvarez, S. Potentiality of Standardized Extract and Isolated Flavonoids from Zuccagnia Punctata for the Treatment of Respiratory Infections by Streptococcus pneumoniae: In Vitro and in Vivo Studies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 140, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dong, H.; Liao, L.; Long, B.; Che, Y.; Peng, T.; He, Y.; Mei, L.; Xu, B. Total Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of Lupinifolin and Its Natural Analogues. J. Nat. Prod. 2024, 87, 1044–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Makhafola, T.J.; Samuel, B.B.; Elgorashi, E.E.; Eloff, J.N. Ochnaflavone and Ochnaflavone 7-O-Methyl Ether Two Antibacterial Biflavonoids from Ochna pretoriensis (Ochnaceae). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 1601–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Weng, Z.; Zeng, F.; Wang, M.; Guo, S.; Tang, Z.; Itagaki, K.; Lin, Y.; Shen, X.; Cao, Y.; Duan, J.-A.; et al. Antimicrobial Activities of Lavandulylated Flavonoids in Sophora flavences against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus via Membrane Disruption. J. Adv. Res. 2024, 57, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Navrátilová, A.; Nešuta, O.; Vančatová, I.; Čížek, A.; Varela-M, R.E.; López-Abán, J.; Villa-Pulgarin, J.A.; Mollinedo, F.; Muro, A.; Žemličková, H.; et al. C-Geranylated Flavonoids from Paulownia Tomentosa Fruits with Antimicrobial Potential and Synergistic Activity with Antibiotics. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Radwan, M.M.; Rodriguez-Guzman, R.; Manly, S.P.; Jacob, M.; Ross, S.A. Sepicanin A—A New Geranyl Flavanone from Artocarpus Sepicanus with Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Phytochem. Lett. 2009, 2, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhao, W.H.; Hu, Z.Q.; Hara, Y.; Shimamura, T. Inhibition of Penicillinase by Epigallocatechin Gallate Resulting in Restoration of Antibacterial Activity of Penicillin against Penicillinase-Producing Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2266–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sakanaka, S.; Aizawa, M.; Kim, M.; Yamamoto, T. Inhibitory Effects of Green Tea Polyphenols on Growth and Cellular Adherence of an Oral Bacterium, Porphyromonas Gingivalis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, H.; Zou, H.; Wang, Y.; Jin, J.; Zhou, M. Inhibition Effect of Epigallocatechin Gallate on the Growth and Biofilm Formation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 75, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jubair, N.; R, M.; Fatima, A.; Mahdi, Y.K.; Abdullah, N.H. Evaluation of Catechin Synergistic and Antibacterial Efficacy on Biofilm Formation and acrA Gene Expression of Uropathogenic E. coli Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rambaher, M.H.; Zdovc, I.; Glavač, N.K.; Gobec, S.; Frlan, R. Mur Ligase F as a New Target for the Flavonoids Quercitrin, Myricetin, and (-)-Epicatechin. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2023, 37, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hossain, M.A.; Park, H.-C.; Lee, K.-J.; Park, S.-W.; Park, S.-C.; Kang, J. In Vitro Synergistic Potentials of Novel Antibacterial Combination Therapies against Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Taylor, P.W. Interactions of Tea-Derived Catechin Gallates with Bacterial Pathogens. Molecules 2020, 25, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Verdrengh, M.; Collins, L.V.; Bergin, P.; Tarkowski, A. Phytoestrogen Genistein as an Anti-Staphylococcal Agent. Microbes Infect. 2004, 6, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kim, H.; Lee, D.G. Nitric Oxide-Inducing Genistein Elicits Apoptosis-like Death via an Intense SOS Response in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 10711–10724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Singh, V.; Pal, A.; Darokar, M.P. Glabridin Synergy with Norfloxacin Induces ROS in Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 67, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. das Neves, M.V.M.; da Silva, T.M.S.; Lima, E.d.O.; da Cunha, E.V.L.; Oliveira, E.d.J. Isoflavone Formononetin from Red Propolis Acts as a Fungicide against Candida sp. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Delfan, N.; Moghadam, M.D.; Shakib, P.; Sepahdar, A.; Naghibeiranvand, Z. Antimicrobial Effect of Formononetin Against the Periodental Pathogens Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Polbuppha, I.; Suthiphasilp, V.; Maneerat, T.; Charoensup, R.; Limtharakul, T.; Cheenpracha, S.; Pyne, S.G.; Laphookhieo, S. Macluracochinones A-E, Antimicrobial Flavonoids from Maclura cochinchinensis (Lour.) Corner. Phytochemistry 2021, 187, 112773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liao, L.; Wang, N.; Mei, L.; Long, B.; Luo, T.; Wang, M.-Q.; Lu, L.; Dong, H.-B. Total Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of Lupalbigenin and Isolupalbigenin. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 27, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Raksat, A.; Maneerat, W.; Andersen, R.J.; Pyne, S.G.; Laphookhieo, S. Antibacterial Prenylated Isoflavonoids from the Stems of Millettia Extensa. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 1835–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sato, M.; Tanaka, H.; Tani, N.; Nagayama, M.; Yamaguchi, R. Different Antibacterial Actions of Isoflavones Isolated from Erythrina Poeppigiana against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 43, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chongwilaikasem, N.; Sithisarn, P.; Rojsanga, P.; Sithisarn, P. Green Extraction and Partial Purification of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) Extracts with High Amounts of Phytochemicals and in Vitro Antioxidant and Antibacterial Effects. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 8819–8835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lakhani, M.; Azim, S.; Akhtar, S.; Ahmad, Z. Inhibition of Escherichia coli ATP Synthase and Cell Growth by Dietary Pomegranate Phenolics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 213, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Silva, S.; Costa, E.M.; Machado, M.; Morais, R.; Calhau, C.; Pintado, M. Antiadhesive and Antibiofilm Effect of Malvidin-3-Glucoside and Malvidin-3-Glucoside/Neochlorogenic Acid Mixtures upon Staphylococcus. Metabolites 2022, 12, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cerezo, A.B.; Cătunescu, G.M.; González, M.M.-P.; Hornedo-Ortega, R.; Pop, C.R.; Rusu, C.C.; Chirilă, F.; Rotar, A.M.; Garcia-Parrilla, M.C.; Troncoso, A.M. Anthocyanins in Blueberries Grown in Hot Climate Exert Strong Antioxidant Activity and May Be Effective against Urinary Tract Bacteria. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhong, L.; Lin, Y.; Wang, C.; Niu, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, J. Chemical Profile, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity Assessment of the Crude Extract and Its Main Flavonoids from Tartary Buckwheat Sprouts. Molecules 2022, 27, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lu, J.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Qiu, M.; Qu, Y.; Yuan, W. The Optimization of Extraction Process, Antioxidant, Whitening and Antibacterial Effects of Fengdan Peony Flavonoids. Molecules 2022, 27, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Shao, X.; Wei, Y.; Xu, F.; Wang, H. Flavonoids from Sedum aizoon L. Inhibit Botrytis cinerea by Negatively Affecting Cell Membrane Lipid Metabolism. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 7139–7151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Farzaei, M.H.; Singh, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Croley, C.R.; Pandey, A.K.; Coy-Barrera, E.; Kumar Patra, J.; Das, G.; Kerry, R.G.; Annunziata, G.; et al. Targeting Inflammation by Flavonoids: Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Metabolic Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mahamud, A.G.M.S.U.; Ashrafudoulla, M.; Nahar, S.; Chowdhury, M.A.H.; Park, S.H.; Ha, S.-D. Luteolin Exhibits Antimicrobial Actions against Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli: Impairment of Cell Adhesion, Membrane Integrity, and Energy Metabolism. Food Control 2024, 166, 110734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, S.; Yao, J.; Zhou, B.; Yang, J.; Chaudry, M.T.; Wang, M.; Xiao, F.; Li, Y.; Yin, W. Bacteriostatic Effect of Quercetin as an Antibiotic Alternative In Vivo and Its Antibacterial Mechanism In Vitro. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, A.-P.; He, Y.-H.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Shi, Y.-P. Antibacterial Activity and Action Mechanism of Flavonoids against Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, Y.; Su, J.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Guo, T.; Li, G. Baicalein Resensitizes Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens to Doxycycline. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0470222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhao, Q.Y.; Yuan, F.W.; Liang, T.; Liang, X.C.; Luo, Y.R.; Jiang, M.; Qing, S.Z.; Zhang, W.M. Baicalin Inhibits Escherichia coli Isolates in Bovine Mastitic Milk and Reduces Antimicrobial Resistance. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 2415–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Serafini, M.; Peluso, I.; Raguzzini, A. Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory Agents. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010, 69, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Agus, S.; Achmadi, S.S.; Mubarik, N.R. Antibacterial Activity of Naringenin-Rich Fraction of Pigeon Pea Leaves toward Salmonella thypi. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zengin, G.; Menghini, L.; Di Sotto, A.; Mancinelli, R.; Sisto, F.; Carradori, S.; Cesa, S.; Fraschetti, C.; Filippi, A.; Angiolella, L.; et al. Chromatographic Analyses, In Vitro Biological Activities, and Cytotoxicity of Cannabis sativa L. Essential Oil: A Multidisciplinary Study. Molecules 2018, 23, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Alkufeidy, R.M.; Ameer Altuwijri, L.; Aldosari, N.S.; Alsakabi, N.; Dawoud, T.M. Antimicrobial and Synergistic Properties of Green Tea Catechins against Microbial Pathogens. J. King Saud. Univ.—Sci. 2024, 36, 103277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Noor Mohammadi, T.; Maung, A.T.; Sato, J.; Sonoda, T.; Masuda, Y.; Honjoh, K.; Miyamoto, T. Mechanism for Antibacterial Action of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Theaflavin-3,3′-Digallate on Clostridium Perfringens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, R.; Sun, W.; Ji, Z. Antibacterial Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) against Shigella Flexneri. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Li, L.; Zhou, P.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Chen, M.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, H.; Yang, B.; Meng, H.; Zheng, J. Antimicrobial activity of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside-lauric acid ester against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gong, S.; Fei, P.; Sun, Q.; Guo, L.; Jiang, L.; Duo, K.; Bi, X.; Yun, X. Action Mode of Cranberry Anthocyanin on Physiological and Morphological Properties of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Application in Cooked Meat. Food Microbiol. 2021, 94, 103632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wafa, B.A.; Makni, M.; Ammar, S.; Khannous, L.; Hassana, A.B.; Bouaziz, M.; Es-Safi, N.E.; Gdoura, R. Antimicrobial Effect of the Tunisian Nana Variety Punica granatum L. Extracts against Salmonella enterica (Serovars Kentucky and Enteritidis) Isolated from Chicken Meat and Phenolic Composition of Its Peel Extract. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 241, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lacombe, A.; Wu, V.C.H.; White, J.; Tadepalli, S.; Andre, E.E. The Antimicrobial Properties of the Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) Fractional Components against Foodborne Pathogens and the Conservation of Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Food Microbiol. 2012, 30, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Crozier, A.; Jaganath, I.B.; Clifford, M.N. Dietary Phenolics: Chemistry, Bioavailability and Effects on Health. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 1001–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hummelova, J.; Rondevaldova, J.; Balastikova, A.; Lapcik, O.; Kokoska, L. The Relationship between Structure and in Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Selected Isoflavones and Their Metabolites with Special Focus on Antistaphylococcal Effect of Demethyltexasin. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 60, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lim, J.-W.; Jo, Y.H.; Choi, J.-S.; Lee, M.K.; Lee, K.Y.; Kang, S.Y. Antibacterial Activities of Prenylated Isoflavones from Maclura Tricuspidata against Fish Pathogenic Streptococcus: Their Structure-Activity Relationships and Extraction Optimization. Molecules 2021, 26, 7451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yuan, G.; Guan, Y.; Yi, H.; Lai, S.; Sun, Y.; Cao, S. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Plant Flavonoids to Gram-Positive Bacteria Predicted from Their Lipophilicities. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yang, R.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, F.; Zhai, R.; Li, P. Kaempferol Inhibits the Growth of Helicobacter pylori in a Manner Distinct from Antibiotics. J. Food Biochem. 2022, 46, e14210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Cui, L.; Ma, Z.; Li, W.; Ma, H.; Guo, S.; Wang, D.; Niu, Y. Inhibitory Activity of Flavonoids Fraction from Astragalus Membranaceus Fisch. Ex Bunge Stems and Leaves on Bacillus Cereus and Its Separation and Purification. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1183393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, J.; Chi, Z.; Zhao, K.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, F.; Shao, X.; Wei, Y. A Transcriptome Analysis of the Antibacterial Mechanism of Flavonoids from Sedum aizoon L. against Shewanella Putrefaciens. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Keller, M.R.; Dörr, T. Bacterial Metabolism and Susceptibility to Cell Wall-Active Antibiotics. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2023, 83, 181–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liang, H.; He, K.; Li, T.; Cui, S.; Tang, M.; Kang, S.; Ma, W.; Song, L. Mechanism and Antibacterial Activity of Vine Tea Extract and Dihydromyricetin against Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhou, H.; Chen, L.; Ouyang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Flavonoids from Chimonanthus salicifolius S. Y. Hu. and Its Transcriptome Analysis against Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Xie, M. Antibacterial Mechanism of Soybean Isoflavone on Staphylococcus aureus. Arch. Microbiol. 2010, 192, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Geethalakshmi, R.; Sundaramurthi, J.C.; Sarada, D.V.L. Antibacterial Activity of Flavonoid Isolated from Trianthema Decandra against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Molecular Docking Study of FabZ. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 121, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Huang, Y.-H.; Huang, C.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Yang, K.-J.; Huang, C.-Y. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus PriA Helicase by Flavonol Kaempferol. Protein J. 2015, 34, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, Y.-M.; Rock, C.O. Evaluation of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Related Plant Polyphenols as Inhibitors of the FabG and FabI Reductases of Bacterial Type II Fatty-Acid Synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 30994–31001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, Y.; Bian, Z.; Wang, Y. Biofilm Formation and Inhibition Mediated by Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 6365–6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Meng, J.; Qiu, T.; Wang, W.; Wang, R.; Liu, J. Baicalin Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Influencing Primary Adhesion and Aggregation Phases in Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 262, 109242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Qayyum, S.; Sharma, D.; Bisht, D.; Khan, A.U. Identification of Factors Involved in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm under Quercetin Stress. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Leitão, J.H. Microbial Virulence Factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yin, N.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Guan, J.; Tao, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Song, W.; Wang, B.; et al. Kaempferol Inhibits the Expression of α-Hemolysin and Protects Mice from Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Lethal Pneumonia. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 162, 105336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Tang, F.; Li, W.-H.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.-H.; Li, Z.; Tang, Y.-S.; Kou, X.; Wang, S.-D.; Bao, M.; Qu, L.-D.; et al. Puerarin Protects against Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Injury of Human Alveolar Epithelial A549 Cells via Downregulating Alpha-Hemolysin Secretion. Microb. Drug Resist. 2014, 20, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Peng, L.-Y.; Yuan, M.; Cui, Z.-Q.; Wu, Z.-M.; Yu, Z.-J.; Song, K.; Tang, B.; Fu, B.-D. Rutin Inhibits Quorum Sensing, Biofilm Formation and Virulence Genes in Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 119, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Lahiri, D.; Nag, M.; Dutta, B.; Mukherjee, I.; Ghosh, S.; Dey, A.; Banerjee, R.; Ray, R.R. Catechin as the Most Efficient Bioactive Compound from Azadirachta Indica with Antibiofilm and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities Against Dental Biofilm: An In Vitro and In Silico Study. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 1617–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nain, Z.; Mansur, F.J.; Syed, S.B.; Islam, M.A.; Azakami, H.; Islam, M.R.; Karim, M.M. Inhibition of Biofilm Formation, Quorum Sensing and Other Virulence Factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Polyphenols of Gynura Procumbens Leaves. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 5357–5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zong, B.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, W.; Ren, M.; Li, C.; Fu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, Y. Baicalin Weakens the Virulence of Porcine Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli by Inhibiting the LuxS/AI-2 Quorum-Sensing System. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chang, A.; He, Q.; Li, L.; Yu, X.; Sun, S.; Zhu, H. Exploring the Quorum Sensing Inhibition of Isolated Chrysin from Penicillium Chrysogenum DXY-1. Bioorg Chem. 2021, 111, 104894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhang, P.; Guo, Q.; Wei, Z.; Yang, Q.; Guo, Z.; Shen, L.; Duan, K.; Chen, L. Baicalin Represses Type Three Secretion System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through PQS System. Molecules 2021, 26, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Lv, Q.; Lv, Y.; Dou, X.; Wassy, S.L.; Jia, G.; Wei, L.; Yu, Q.; Deng, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J. Myricetin Inhibits the Type III Secretion System of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium by Downregulating the Salmonella Pathogenic Island I Gene Regulatory Pathway. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 150, 104695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lan, J.-E.; Li, X.-J.; Zhu, X.-F.; Sun, Z.-L.; He, J.-M.; Zloh, M.; Gibbons, S.; Mu, Q. Flavonoids from Artemisia Rupestris and Their Synergistic Antibacterial Effects on Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zou, D.; Xie, K.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Xie, M. Inhibitory effects of biochanin A on the efflux pump of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 2014, 54, 1204–1211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, D.; Xie, K.; Zou, D.; Meng, M.; Xie, M. Inhibitory Effects of Silybin on the Efflux Pump of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Alves Borges Leal, A.L.; Teixeira da Silva, P.; Nunes da Rocha, M.; Marinho, E.M.; Marinho, E.S.; Marinho, M.M.; Bandeira, P.N.; Sampaio Nogueira, C.E.; Barreto, H.M.; Rodrigues Teixeira, A.M.; et al. Potentiating Activity of Norfloxacin by Synthetic Chalcones against NorA Overproducing Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 155, 104894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sari, R.; Pratiwi, L.; Apridamayanti, P. The Highest Dosage Combination Activity Screening from the Leaf Fraction of Melastoma Malabathricum with Antibiotic Gentamicin and Ciprofloxacin. J. Pharmacopunct. 2022, 25, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yi, L.; Cao, M.; Chen, X.; Bai, Y.; Wang, W.; Wei, X.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, T.; Zhu, Z.; et al. In Vitro Antimicrobial Synergistic Activity and the Mechanism of the Combination of Naringenin and Amikacin Against Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bakar, N.S.; Zin, N.M.; Basri, D.F. Synergy of Flavone with Vancomycin and Oxacillin against Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphyloccus aureus. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 633–638. [Google Scholar]
  148. Cheng, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B.; Liang, S.; Yang, Y.; Gui, S.; Zhang, K.; Qu, S.; Li, L. Mechanism of Synergistic Action of Colistin with Resveratrol and Baicalin against Mcr-1-Positive Escherichia coli. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 180, 117487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhong, Z.-X.; Zhou, S.; Liang, Y.-J.; Wei, Y.-Y.; Li, Y.; Long, T.-F.; He, Q.; Li, M.-Y.; Zhou, Y.-F.; Yu, Y.; et al. Natural Flavonoids Disrupt Bacterial Iron Homeostasis to Potentiate Colistin Efficacy. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadg4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Vipin, C.; Saptami, K.; Fida, F.; Mujeeburahiman, M.; Rao, S.S.; Athmika; Arun, A.B.; Rekha, P.D. Potential Synergistic Activity of Quercetin with Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Pal, A.; Tripathi, A. Quercetin Potentiates Meropenem Activity among Pathogenic Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Odabaş Köse, E.; Koyuncu Özyurt, Ö.; Bilmen, S.; Er, H.; Kilit, C.; Aydemir, E. Quercetin: Synergistic Interaction with Antibiotics against Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Atta, S.; Waseem, D.; Fatima, H.; Naz, I.; Rasheed, F.; Kanwal, N. Antibacterial Potential and Synergistic Interaction between Natural Polyphenolic Extracts and Synthetic Antibiotic on Clinical Isolates. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2023, 30, 103576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ma, Y.; Kang, X.; Wang, G.; Luo, S.; Luo, X.; Wang, G. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm by Quercetin Combined with Antibiotics. Biofouling 2024, 40, 996–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Deepika, M.S.; Thangam, R.; Vijayakumar, T.S.; Sasirekha, R.; Vimala, R.T.V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Arun, S.; Babu, M.D.; Thirumurugan, R. Antibacterial Synergy between Rutin and Florfenicol Enhances Therapeutic Spectrum against Drug Resistant Aeromonas Hydrophila. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 135, 103612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Amin, M.U.; Khurram, M.; Khattak, B.; Khan, J. Antibiotic Additive and Synergistic Action of Rutin, Morin and Quercetin against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Akilandeswari, K.; Ruckmani, K. Synergistic Antibacterial Effect of Apigenin with β-Lactam Antibiotics and Modulation of Bacterial Resistance by a Possible Membrane Effect against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016, 62, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Eumkeb, G.; Siriwong, S.; Thumanu, K. Synergistic Activity of Luteolin and Amoxicillin Combination against Amoxicillin-Resistant Escherichia coli and Mode of Action. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2012, 117, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Joung, D.-K.; Kang, O.-H.; Seo, Y.-S.; Zhou, T.; Lee, Y.-S.; Han, S.-H.; Mun, S.-H.; Kong, R.; Song, H.-J.; Shin, D.-W.; et al. Luteolin Potentiates the Effects of Aminoglycoside and β-Lactam Antibiotics against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Vitro. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 11, 2597–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kim, S.; Woo, E.-R.; Lee, D.G. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Isoquercitrin: Apoptosis and Membrane Permeabilization Related to Reactive Oxygen Species in Candida Albicans. IUBMB Life 2019, 71, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Fournier-Larente, J.; Morin, M.-P.; Grenier, D. Green Tea Catechins Potentiate the Effect of Antibiotics and Modulate Adherence and Gene Expression in Porphyromonas Gingivalis. Arch. Oral Biol. 2016, 65, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Buchmann, D.; Schultze, N.; Borchardt, J.; Böttcher, I.; Schaufler, K.; Guenther, S. Synergistic Antimicrobial Activities of Epigallocatechin Gallate, Myricetin, Daidzein, Gallic Acid, Epicatechin, 3-Hydroxy-6-Methoxyflavone and Genistein Combined with Antibiotics against ESKAPE Pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 949–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Feng, L.; Xu, M.; Wen, H.; Yao, Z.; Shi, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, C.; Cao, J.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Synergistic Effect of Chrysin in Combination with Colistin against Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 961498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zhou, H.; Xu, M.; Guo, W.; Yao, Z.; Du, X.; Chen, L.; Sun, Y.; Shi, S.; Cao, J.; Zhou, T. The Antibacterial Activity of Kaempferol Combined with Colistin against Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0226522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Siriphap, A.; Kiddee, A.; Duangjai, A.; Yosboonruang, A.; Pook-In, G.; Saokaew, S.; Sutheinkul, O.; Rawangkan, A. Antimicrobial Activity of the Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) against Clinical Isolates of Multidrug-Resistant Vibrio cholerae. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Parvez, M.A.K.; Saha, K.; Rahman, J.; Munmun, R.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Dey, S.K.; Rahman, M.S.; Islam, S.; Shariare, M.H. Antibacterial Activities of Green Tea Crude Extracts and Synergistic Effects of Epigallocatechingallate (EGCG) with Gentamicin against MDR Pathogens. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Cui, Y.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, H.; Yeom, J.; Ko, K.; Park, W.; Park, S. AFM Probing the Mechanism of Synergistic Effects of the Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) with Cefotaxime against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Denny, B.J.; West, P.W.J.; Mathew, T.C. Antagonistic Interactions between the Flavonoids Hesperetin and Naringenin and Beta-Lactam Antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2008, 65, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of nine major flavonoids.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of nine major flavonoids.
Antibiotics 14 00334 g001
Figure 2. Antibacterial mechanism of natural flavonoids.
Figure 2. Antibacterial mechanism of natural flavonoids.
Antibiotics 14 00334 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Cao, M.; Shang, Z.; Xu, J.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, W.; Wei, X.; Zhou, X.; Bai, Y.; et al. Research Progress on the Antibacterial Activity of Natural Flavonoids. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040334

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Cao M, Shang Z, Xu J, Chen X, Zhu Z, Wang W, Wei X, Zhou X, Bai Y, et al. Research Progress on the Antibacterial Activity of Natural Flavonoids. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(4):334. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhijin, Mingze Cao, Zixuan Shang, Jing Xu, Xu Chen, Zhen Zhu, Weiwei Wang, Xiaojuan Wei, Xuzheng Zhou, Yubin Bai, and et al. 2025. "Research Progress on the Antibacterial Activity of Natural Flavonoids" Antibiotics 14, no. 4: 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040334

APA Style

Zhang, Z., Cao, M., Shang, Z., Xu, J., Chen, X., Zhu, Z., Wang, W., Wei, X., Zhou, X., Bai, Y., & Zhang, J. (2025). Research Progress on the Antibacterial Activity of Natural Flavonoids. Antibiotics, 14(4), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop