Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Short Novel Antimicrobial Peptides in a Mouse Model of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Skin Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotic Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in View of the Newly Developed β-Lactams: A Narrative Review of the Existing Evidence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of KPC-216, a Novel KPC-3 Variant, in a Clinical Isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 Co-Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol

by
Maria Giufrè
1,*,†,
Giulia Errico
1,†,
Maria Del Grosso
1,
Michela Pagnotta
1,
Bernardetta Palazzotti
2,
Milva Ballardini
2,
Annalisa Pantosti
1,
Marcello Meledandri
2,† and
Monica Monaco
1,†
1
Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
2
San Filippo Neri Hospital, 00135 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(6), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060507
Submission received: 23 April 2024 / Revised: 18 May 2024 / Accepted: 25 May 2024 / Published: 29 May 2024

Abstract

:
Background: Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) represents a global threat to public health, with limited antimicrobial therapeutic options. In this study, we analyzed a ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate obtained from a patient previously exposed to CAZ-AVI expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using Illumina and Nanopore Technologies. Short- and long-reads were combined with Unicycler. Assemblies were investigated for multilocus sequence typing (MLST), antimicrobial resistance genes, porins, and plasmids. Results: The K. pneumoniae isolate (KP_RM_1) was resistant to CAZ-AVI, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, ertapenem, and cefiderocol (FDC) but was susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem–vaborbactam, and imipenem–relebactam. WGS revealed that the KP_RM_1 genome is composed of a single chromosome of 5 Mbp and five circular plasmids. Further analysis showed the presence of novel blaKPC-216 located on a 72 kb plasmid. KPC-216 differs from KPC-3 by a Lysin (K) insertion at position 168 (+K168). Conclusions: We report the identification of a new KPC-3 variant associated with CAZ-AVI resistance. The KPC variants associated with CAZ-AVI resistance should be determined to promptly inform clinicians and start the appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

1. Introduction

During the last decade, the worldwide spread of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) has been challenging the global health system, associated with infections with high mortality rates [1,2]. Furthermore, CP-KP isolates are resistant to most of the antimicrobial agents available in clinical practice, restricting the therapeutic options [3,4]. Recently, new therapeutic options were made available, such as the new antibiotic cefiderocol (FDC), a siderophore cephalosporin [5], and novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) such as ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem–vaborbactam (MVB), and imipenem–relebactam (IMR) [6]. In recent years, CAZ-AVI has become the most widely used antibiotic for the treatment of CP-KP infections [7]. However, with the increase in its clinical use and the consequent antibiotic selective pressure, KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) isolates started to develop resistance to CAZ-AVI, mainly through mutation of the blaKPC gene, leading to the inefficacy of the antibiotic [8]. Besides mutation of the blaKPC gene, resistance to CAZ-AVI is due to several mechanisms, likely acting together, including the alterations of the major porins that allow the diffusion of CAZ-AVI across the outer membrane (OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins) and the increased gene expression and/or copy number of blaKPC [9,10]. Isolates that produce KPC variants are usually susceptible to meropenem, which can be used as a last-resort antibiotic after the failure of CAZ-AVI treatment [11]. On the other hand, such isolates can exhibit cross-resistance to FDC, possibly due to the similar structure of the side chains between FDC and ceftazidime [12], with the contribution of other mechanisms including the alteration of porins. The mechanism underlying the resistance to FDC is a combination of different mechanisms including the co-expression of different β-lactamases (NDM metallo β-lactamases and KPC variants), mutations affecting siderophore–drug receptor expression/function (cirA and fiu of Escherichia coli), overexpression of efflux pumps (OmpK35 and OmpK36), and target modification (penicillin-binding protein 3, PBP-3 coded by the ftsI gene) [13,14].
Here we describe the phenotypic and genomic analysis of a KPC-KP isolate harboring a novel KPC-3 variant, bearing an amino-acid insertion within the Ω-loop region. This KPC-KP isolate was resistant to CAZ-AVI and FDC and was obtained from a patient with urinary tract infection (UTI), previously exposed to CAZ-AVI treatment.

2. Results

2.1. Strain Collection

In October 2022, the national reference laboratory (NRL) for Antibiotic-Resistance (AMR) at Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS, Rome, Italy) received a CAZ-AVI-resistant KPC-KP obtained from a 31-year-old patient. In September 2022, the patient had been hospitalized for bloodstream infection (BSI) due to KPC-KP and ESBL-E. coli and UTI caused by KPC-KP, and he had received treatment with CAZ-AVI. After recovery, the patient was discharged with intestinal colonization by KPC-KP, susceptible to CAZ-AVI. Only the CAZ-AVI-resistant KPC-KP isolate (KP_RM_1) obtained from the UTI episode in October 2022 was available for further investigation.

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing results for KP_RM_1 showed that the isolate was resistant to ertapenem but susceptible to meropenem and imipenem (Table 1). The isolate was resistant to all the β-lactams tested, quinolones, and aminoglycosides but it was susceptible to colistin, tigecycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Concerning the BLICs, the isolate was resistant to CAZ-AVI and susceptible to MVB and IMR. Resistance to FDC (MIC ≥ 8 mg/L) was also detected. Isolates from the previous hospitalization in September for BSI and UTI were resistant to all the β-lactams tested and ciprofloxacin and susceptible to CAZ-AVI, except the UTI isolate, which was not tested (Table 1). Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from BSI and UTI were also resistant to imipenem and meropenem. Resistance to FDC was not tested for those isolates (Table 1).

2.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing and In Silico Analysis

KP_RM_1 was subjected to both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing. WGS analysis integrating short and long reads produced a circular chromosome of 5,396,125 bp in size, with a GC content of 57.3%. Gene prediction and annotation identified 5019 coding sequences, 25 rRNAs, and 86 tRNAs. The isolate was assigned to ST101 by in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The analysis of the capsular biosynthesis locus (KL) and O-locus revealed that the isolate was associated with the KL17 locus (wzi-137 allele) and the O1/O2v1 locus. The iron-scavenging siderophore yersiniabactin ybt9 gene cluster, associated with the mobile genetic element ICEKp3, was also detected, belonging to YbST183. Resistome analysis revealed the presence of several resistance determinants and gene mutations (Table 2). The isolate carried chromosomally encoded resistance gene blaSHV-1 along with quinolone-related resistance gene mutations, causing substitutions S83Y and D87N in GyrA and S80I in ParC, respectively. Regarding the major porins that allow the diffusion of CAZ-AVI across the outer membrane, the isolate had a truncated OmpK35 (at amino acid 63) and a mutated OmpK36 with a threonine and aspartic acid insertion at position 134 (134TD duplication). No tigecycline- or colistin-acquired resistance genes or chromosomal mutations associated with resistance to these antibiotics were found.
Siderophore receptor and ftsI gene comparisons with the reference genome ATCC13883 revealed that cirA possessed a mutation, leading to an amino acid substitution in CirA protein at position 134 (A134V); the fiu gene had a mutation that resulted in an amino acid substitution in the Fiu protein at position 387 (D387N); the ftsI gene was 100% identical to the reference gene.

2.4. Plasmid Analysis

Plasmid analysis revealed the presence of five plasmids (Table 3): four small Col-type plasmids (range 5–9 kb in size) and a larger plasmid (P007). Only the largest plasmid harbored resistance genes. Plasmid P007, with a length of 72,398 bp containing 80 CDS, carried a mutated blaKPC-3. This blaKPC gene variant had a triplet AAG insertion at position 504 with respect to the blaKPC-3 gene, corresponding to the insertion of the amino acid lysin (K) at position 168 (+K168), generating a new KPC-3 variant named KPC-216 (Supplementary Figure S1). This insertion occurred in the active site of KPC within the Ω-loop (contained within amino acids Arg164 and Asp179). The blaKPC-216 gene was located on Tn4401, a Tn3-like transposon (approximately 10 kb), which contains tnpA transposase, a tnpR resolvase, and insertion sequences (IS) upstream and downstream from the blaKPC gene (ISKpn7 and ISKpn6, respectively) (Figure 1).
In addition, P007 had other antibiotic resistance determinants: gene coding for resistance to aminoglycosides (armA) and macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins (msr(E) and mph(E) (Table 3)). The mer operon, conferring resistance to mercuric ions, was also present in P007.
P007 was a multi-replicon plasmid, carrying IncFIA(HI1), IncFII(K) (belonging to pMLST [K2:A13:B-]), and IncR.
Comparative analysis of the P007 plasmid performed using BLASTN and showing the best match revealed that it had 99.9% identity and 100% coverage with two plasmids (GenBank accession number MT809698.1 and MT809692.1) from K. pneumoniae strains isolated in Italy [15].
Conjugation experiments with the KP_RM_1 isolate carried out to assess the transfer potential of P007 failed to produce transconjugants when rifampicin-resistant E. coli DH5α was used as the recipient strain.

2.5. Virulence Factors Analysis

Several genes coding for virulence factors (VFs) were detected in the KP_RM_1 isolate, as shown in Table 4. Genes coding for VFs involved in adhesion (Types I, III, and IV fimbriae), antiphagocytosis (capsule), efflux pump (acrAB), iron uptake (aerobactin, ent siderophore, Salmochelin, and Yersiniabactin), the secretion system (T6SS-I/-II/-III), serum resistance (LPS), and fimbrial adherence (Stb) were detected. Virulence genes coding for VFs related to toxicity were not found in this isolate.

3. Discussion

The introduction of the BLICs into clinical practice represented a new and effective therapeutic alternative to combat serious carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales infections [16,17]. However, resistance was soon reported, mainly due to mutations of the blaKPC-2 or blaKPC-3 genes, bringing new challenges to clinical treatment [18]. Recently, a plethora of new KPC variants were described, originating from amino acid substitution, insertion, or deletion in the active sites of wild-type blaKPC [19]. These variants produce carbapenemases showing a modified three-dimensional structure that has reduced activity on CAZ-AVI, associated with resistance to one of the last antimicrobial agents available for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. In the present study, we analyzed a KPC-K. pneumoniae strain (KP_RM_1) resistant to CAZ-AVI carrying a novel blaKPC that was isolated from a critically ill patient presenting with UTI. The KPC variant, named KPC-216, is a single amino acid variant of KPC-3, carrying a lysin insertion at position 168 (+K168), along with mutations of porin OmpK36 and the deletion of OmpK35. The modifications of porins possibly restrict antibiotic entry and act in synergy with variant carbapenemase enzymes to increase the level of resistance to CAZ-AVI [20]. The insertion occurred in the KPC active site, within the Ω-loop, frequently associated with mutations leading to resistance to CAZ-AVI [21]. As reported in other studies, we observed cross-resistance between CAZ-AVI and FDC and the restoration of susceptibility to imipenem and meropenem [22,23]. This latter side-effect is an important observation for clinicians who can use meropenem in association with other antimicrobial agents as a salvage therapy after failure of CZA treatment.
In this strain, FDC resistance may be due to a combination of factors, such as the presence of a KPC variant, the loss of OmpK35, and mutations in OmpK36 and the siderophores CirA and Fiu.
The blaKPC-216 gene was carried on an IncF plasmid, as frequently reported in most KPC-carrying plasmids, and it was embedded into a Tn4401 transposon [24,25]. The plasmid P007 harboring the blaKPC-216 gene was characterized by the presence of both FIA(HI1) and R replicon in an ST101 strain, as previously reported in a paper describing new variants blaKPC-39 and blaKPC-68, conferring resistance to CAZ-AVI [15]. Strains carrying blaKPC-39 and blaKPC-68 were isolated in a different hospital in the same city in 2019 three years before the isolation of KP_RM_1 [15]. blaKPC-39- and blaKPC-68-associated plasmids were almost identical to P007 and lacked the entire transfer locus tra, essential for transfer during conjugation. Likely, for that reason, conjugation experiments of the P007 plasmid were unsuccessful, as previously reported [26]. Also in our study, the blaKPC gene was found in an isolate belonging to ST101, a high-risk clone causing hospital infections and outbreaks that is, nowadays, one of the predominant high-risk lineages circulating in Italy [27].
The patient was treated with CAZ-AVI for a BSI during a previous hospitalization and had intestinal colonization by KPC-KP before the isolation of KP_RM_1 resistant to CAZ-AVI. Unfortunately, the KPC-KP isolates causing BSI and UTI had not been stored and therefore it is impossible to know if the KPC variant was already present, but they were resistant to meropenem and susceptible to CAZ-AVI. It is likely that the prolonged use of CAZ-AVI in the previous month might have selected the emergence of the CAZ-AVI-resistant isolate.
The presence of a plasmid-borne KPC-variant in a high-risk clone is alarming in a country such as Italy with one of the highest levels of CR-KP circulation, where further spreading of plasmids and clones by horizontal transfer of plasmids or mobility of small genetic elements as transposons could worsen the scenario. Critically ill patients who are frequently subjected to repeated treatments with different antibiotics for long periods are particularly prone to the selection of AMR bacterial pathogens that can acquire new resistance mechanisms. Moreover, K. pneumoniae can colonize fragile patients for a long period, as already shown in previous studies [28,29], and can accumulate resistance genes under selective pressure.
This study presents some limitations: (i) the previous isolates from BSI and UTI episodes in the preceding month from the same patient were not available for genomic comparison to evaluate in-host changes in K. pneumoniae isolates over time. This still leaves open the possibility that the KPC variant was not necessarily selected by the previous use of CAZ-AVI, resulting in CAZ-AVI resistance within the same isolate. Therefore, the KPC variant could potentially arise from the acquisition of a new isolate with a different susceptibility pattern, likely during the previous hospitalization, though this hypothesis is less feasible than the previous one. Furthermore, (ii) our attempt to transfer the plasmid to a recipient strain was not successful, possibly due to the lack of the tra locus in P007.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Phenotypic Analysis

In October 2022, the NRL for AMR at Istituto Superiore di Sanità received a KPC-KP isolate resistant to CAZ-AVI obtained from the UTI of a 31-year-old patient. The patient had been admitted to different hospitals several times in the previous 6 months for his chronic conditions (chronic renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatitis C virus positivity, and latent tuberculosis). In September 2022, the patient had been hospitalized for BSI due to KPC-KP and ESBL-E. coli and UTI caused by KPC-KP. He then received treatment with CAZ-AVI (2/0.5 g intravenous every 8 h for 11 days). Those isolates had not been stored but bacterial identification and in vitro susceptibility testing using the VITEK-MS 2 system (bioMérieux, Craponne, France) were performed at the San Filippo Neri hospital laboratory located in Rome. The KPC-KP isolate, designated as KP_RM_1, was then sent to the NRL for AMR at ISS for further phenotypic and molecular characterization. Carbapenemase production was confirmed by phenotypic testing with the agar tablet/disk diffusion method (KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit; ROSCO Diagnostica, Taastrup, Denmark). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was confirmed by the reference broth microdilution method using lyophilized, custom microtitration plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rodano, Italy), including MVB, IMR, and FDC. E. coli ATCC 25922 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA-2814 were used as the quality control strains. The interpretative breakpoints were based on EUCAST, version 14.0 [30]. For tigecycline, the results were interpreted using the E. coli breakpoints.
To assess the transfer potential of P007, conjugation experiments were performed using KP_RM_1 as the donor and rifampicin-resistant E. coli DH5-α as the recipient. Transconjugants were selected on MH agar plates, supplemented with rifampicin (50 mg/L) and ceftazidime (4 mg/L) at 37 °C.

4.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing and In Silico Analysis

The KPC-KP isolate was submitted to whole-genome sequencing: genomic DNA was extracted from an overnight culture grown in Muller Hinton Broth by using the NucleoSpin®DNA Extraction Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Both short-read and long-read sequencing was performed. A genomic DNA paired-end library was produced using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and was sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq system (Illumina Inc.) to obtain short-reads. The library used to obtain long reads was prepared with the Rapid Barcoding kit 96 and sequenced using the MinION Mk1C sequencing platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). De novo assembly of short reads was performed using SPAdes 3.14 software through the ARIES public Galaxy server (https://w3.iss.it/site/aries/, accessed on 18 February 2024). We integrated Illumina assemblies and Oxford Nanopore Technologies reads by using the Unicycler hybrid assembly tool [31]. We ensured that the genome was free of contamination by using KmerFinder, a tool available at the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) server (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/, accessed on 2 April 2024). We confirmed the identification of the isolate as K. pneumoniae sub. pneumoniae by using FastANI (Galaxy version 1.3) through the European Galaxy server (https://usegalaxy.eu/, accessed on 10 May 2024). In silico analysis of the assembled contigs was also performed using tools available at CGE and screened for plasmid content using the PlasmidFinder tool. Plasmids of the IncF type were subtyped by assigning a replicon allele using the pMLST tool at CGE. Gene prediction and annotation of assembled chromosomes and plasmids were performed by using PROKKA (Galaxy Version 1.14.5), through the European Galaxy server. Proksee was used to visualize and draw the transposon associated with the blaKPC gene (https://proksee.ca/, assessed on 10 May 2024). The identification of resistance and capsular virulence genes related to KPC-KP was performed by Kleborate using the ARIES Galaxy server (Galaxy Version 2.3.0). In silico analysis also permitted us to determine if each AMR gene was located on the chromosome or on a plasmid by searching for AMR genes in each sequence separately (i.e., chromosome or each plasmid). We then submitted the nucleotide sequence of the blaKPC gene to GenBank to obtain the allele curation for the designation of the new KPC-variant (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/submit-beta-lactamase/, accessed on 18 February 2024).
Genes cirA, fiu, and ftsI were compared by BLAST at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 18 February 2024) with the K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 reference genome (GenBank accession no. JOOW00000000) to identify mutations resulting in the alteration of siderophore receptors or PBP-3, possibly associated with FDC resistance. Comparative analysis of the P007 plasmid was performed using BLASTN (Megablast) at NCBI. The identification of virulence genes related to KP_RM_1 was performed by searching the virulence factor database (VFDB) (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/main.htm, accessed on 7 May 2024).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we report the identification of blaKPC-216, a new plasmid-borne blaKPC-3 variant associated with CAZ-AVI resistance and cross-resistance to FDC. Considering the broad use of CAZ-AVI, when dealing with infection caused by KPC-KP, susceptibility to CAZ-AVI and FDC should be tested before their clinical use. The KPC variants associated with CAZ-AVI resistance should be determined to promptly inform clinicians and start the appropriate antimicrobial therapy. From this perspective and due to the complexity of interactions between co-produced efflux pump variants and variant carbapenemases, WGS should support routine diagnostics to investigate the resistance mechanisms of AMR pathogens more deeply.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics13060507/s1, Figure S1: (A) Nucleotide alignment of blaKPC-216 in comparison to blaKPC-3 gene; (B) Aminoacid alignment of KPC-216 in comparison to KPC-3 protein.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.E., M.D.G., A.P., M.M. (Monica Monaco) and M.G.; formal analysis, G.E., M.D.G. and M.G.; investigation, M.M. (Marcello Meledandri), M.P., B.P. and M.B.; writing—original draft, G.E. and M.G.; writing—review and editing, M.D.G., M.M. (Marcello Meledandri), A.P. and M.M. (Monica Monaco). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by EU funding within the MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because it was a retrospective investigation of a bacterial isolate.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived because this was a retrospective study and all information and metadata on patients were anonymized (no patient identification information was presented).

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data were submitted to GenBank at NCBI under the BioProject PRJNA1029903; KPC-216 Accession No. PP379169.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 3, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martin, A.; Fahrbach, K.; Zhao, Q.; Lodise, T. Association between Carbapenem Resistance and Mortality Among Adult, Hospitalized Patients with Serious Infections Due to Enterobacteriaceae: Results of a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, ofy150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, M.; Earley, M.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Salcedo, S.; Cober, E.; Li, L.; Kanj, S.S.; et al. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): A prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Murray, C.J.L.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. El-Lababidi, R.M.; Rizk, J.G. Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin. Ann. Pharmacother. 2020, 54, 1215–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yahav, D.; Giske, C.G.; Gramatniece, A.; Abodakpi, H.; Tam, V.H.; Leibovici, L. New β-lactam- β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 34, e00115-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, J.; Hu, Q.; Zhou, P.; Deng, S. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection 2024, 52, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hobson, C.A.; Pierrat, G.; Tenaillon, O.; Bonacorsi, S.; Bercot, B.; Jaouen, E.; Jacquier, H.; Birgy, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase Variants Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam: An Evolutionary Overview. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e0044722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, Z.; Ding, B.; Ye, M.; Wang, P.; Bi, Y.; Wu, S.; Xu, X.; Guo, Q.; Wang, M. High ceftazidime hydrolysis activity and porin OmpK35 deficiency contribute to the decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1930–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Pilato, V.; Principe, L.; Andriani, L.; Aiezza, N.; Coppi, M.; Ricci, S.; Giani, T.; Luzzaro, F.; Rossolini, G.M. Deciphering variable resistance to novel carbapenem-based β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in a multi-clonal outbreak caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 29, 537.e1–537.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hernández-García, M.; Castillo-Polo, J.A.; Cordero, D.G.; Pérez-Viso, B.; García-Castillo, M.; de la Fuente, J.S.; Morosini, M.I.; Cantón, R.; Ruiz-Garbajosa, P. Impact of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment in the Emergence of Novel KPC Variants in the ST307-Klebsiella pneumoniae High-Risk Clone and Consequences for Their Routine Detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2022, 60, e0224521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hobson, C.A.; Cointe, A.; Jacquier, H.; Choudhury, A.; Magnan, M.; Courroux, C.; Tenaillon, O.; Bonacorsi, S.; Birgy, A. Cross-resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam in KPC β-lactamase mutants and the inoculum effect. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 1172.e7–1172.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Karakonstantis, S.; Rousaki, M.; Kritsotakis, E.I. Cefiderocol: Systematic Review of Mechanisms of Resistance, Heteroresistance and In Vivo Emergence of Resistance. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lan, P.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, J. Catecholate siderophore receptor CirA impacts cefiderocol susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2022, 60, 106646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carattoli, A.; Arcari, G.; Bibbolino, G.; Sacco, F.; Tomolillo, D.; Di Lella, F.M.; Trancassini, M.; Faino, L.; Venditti, M.; Antonelli, G.; et al. Evolutionary Trajectories toward Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0057421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bush, K.; Bradford, P.A. Interplay between β-lactamases and new β-lactamase inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tumbarello, M.; Raffaelli, F.; Giannella, M.; Mantengoli, E.; Mularoni, A.; Venditti, M.; De Rosa, F.G.; Sarmati, L.; Bassetti, M.; Brindicci, G.; et al. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Use for Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase–Producing K. pneumoniae Infections: A Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 1664–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shields, R.K.; Nguyen, M.H.; Press, E.G.; Chen, L.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Clancy, C.J. Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance and Restoration of Carbapenem Susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K pneumoniae: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2017, 4, ofx101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ding, L.; Shen, S.; Chen, J.; Tian, Z.; Shi, Q.; Han, R.; Guo, Y.; Hu, F. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase variants: The new threat to global public health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2023, 36, e0000823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. David, S.; Wong, J.L.C.; Sanchez-Garrido, J.; Kwong, H.-S.; Low, W.W.; Morecchiato, F.; Giani, T.; Rossolini, G.M.; Brett, S.J.; Clements, A.; et al. Widespread emergence of OmpK36 loop 3 insertions among multidrug-resistant clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haidar, G.; Clancy, C.J.; Shields, R.K.; Hao, B.; Cheng, S.; Nguyen, M.H. Mutations in bla KPC-3 That Confer Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Encode Novel KPC-3 Variants That Function as Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02534-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Poirel, L.; Sadek, M.; Kusaksizoglu, A.; Nordmann, P. Co-resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in clinical isolates producing KPC variants. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2022, 41, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Findlay, J.; Poirel, L.; Juhas, M.; Nordmann, P. KPC-Mediated Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Collateral Effects in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, AAC0089021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mathers, A.J.; Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D.D. The Role of Epidemic Resistance Plasmids and International High-Risk Clones in the Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 565–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Naas, T.; Cuzon, G.; Villegas, M.-V.; Lartigue, M.-F.; Quinn, J.P.; Nordmann, P. Genetic Structures at the Origin of Acquisition of the β-Lactamase bla KPC Gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 1257–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Di Pilato, V.; Codda, G.; Niccolai, C.; Willison, E.; Wong, J.L.; Coppo, E.; Frankel, G.; Marchese, A.; Rossolini, G.M. Functional features of KPC-109, a novel 270-loop KPC-3 mutant mediating resistance to avibactam-based β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2024, 63, 107030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Di Pilato, V.; Errico, G.; Monaco, M.; Giani, T.; Del Grosso, M.; Antonelli, A.; David, S.; Lindh, E.; Camilli, R.; Aanensen, D.M.; et al. The changing epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniaein Italy: Toward polyclonal evolution with emergence of high-risk lineages. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 76, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tinelli, M.; Rossini, A.; Scudeller, L.; Zabzuni, D.; Errico, G.; Fogato, E.; D’Angelo, R.; Silverj, F.G.; Cesana, E.; Bergamaschini, L.C.; et al. Dynamics of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales intestinal colonisation in the elderly population after hospital discharge, Italy, 2018-2020. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2022, 59, 106594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lim, C.J.; Cheng, A.C.; Kennon, J.; Spelman, D.; Hale, D.; Melican, G.; Sidjabat, H.E.; Paterson, D.L.; Kong, D.C.M.; Peleg, A.Y. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and risk factors for carriage in long-term care facilities: A nested case-control study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1972–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. EUCAST. EUCAST Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 12.0. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 23 April 2024).
  31. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of Tn4401 structure identified on plasmid P007 from K. pneumoniae isolate KP_RM_1. Genes are represented as purple arrows with their corresponding transcription orientation. Bar scale indicates the length in kbp.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of Tn4401 structure identified on plasmid P007 from K. pneumoniae isolate KP_RM_1. Genes are represented as purple arrows with their corresponding transcription orientation. Bar scale indicates the length in kbp.
Antibiotics 13 00507 g001
Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates from the patient.
Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates from the patient.
AntibioticsMIC (mg/L)/Susceptibility Category 1
KP_RM_1
(October 2022)
KP_RM_BSI
(September 2022)
KP_RM_UTI
(September 2022)
EC 2_RM_BSI
(September 2022)
Amikacin≥32Rna 3nanananana
Ampicillin≥16Rnananananana
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid16/2R≥32R≥32R≥32R
Cefepime≥8R≥32R≥32R16R
Ceftazidime≥8R≥64R≥64R≥64R
Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI)16/4R4Snana≤0.12S
Cefotaxime≥4Rnananananana
Cefiderocol (FDC)≥8Rnananananana
Ciprofloxacin≥1R≥4R≥4R≥4R
Colistin≤0.5S0.5Snana0.5S
Ertapenem≥2Rnananananana
Imipenem≤1S≥16R8R≤0.125S
Imipenem–relebactam (IMR)0.25/4Snananananana
Gentamicin≥8R≥16R≥16R≥16R
Levofloxacin≥2Rnananananana
Meropenem2S≥16R≥16R≤0.125S
Meropenem–vaborbactam (MVB)0.5/8S4Snananana
Nitrofurantoin≥64Rnananananana
Piperacillin/tazobactam16/4R≥128R≥128R8S
Tigecycline≤0.5Snananananana
Tobramycin≥8R≥16Rnana≥16R
Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole≤1/19S≤20S≤20S≥320R
1 R, resistant; S, susceptible; 2 EC, E. coli; 3 na, not available.
Table 2. Resistome analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP_RM_1.
Table 2. Resistome analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP_RM_1.
Resistant toLocalization
Resistance gene
armAAminoglycosidesPlasmid
blaSHV-1β-lactamsChromosome
blaKPC-216β-lactamsPlasmid
msr(E)Macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS)Plasmid
mph(E)Macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS)Plasmid
Protein substitution
GyrA S83YQuinolonesChromosome
GyrA D87NQuinolonesChromosome
ParC S80IQuinolonesChromosome
OmpK35 AA63 stopβ-lactamsChromosome
OmpK36 134TD duplicationβ-lactamsChromosome
Table 3. Plasmid analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP_RM_1.
Table 3. Plasmid analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae KP_RM_1.
Plasmid IDLength (bp)Plasmid RepliconpMLSTResistance Genes
P0035356Col440II -
P0147585Col156 -
P0269289ColRNAI -
P0405592ColRNAI -
P00772,398IncFIA(HI1), IncFII(K), IncR[K2:A13:B-]blaKPC-216, armA, mph(E), msr(E)
Table 4. Virulence factors and related genes by VF class in isolate KP_RM_1.
Table 4. Virulence factors and related genes by VF class in isolate KP_RM_1.
VFclass Virulence Factors Related Genes
Adherence Type 3 fimbriae mrkA, mrkB, mrkC, mrkD, mrkF, mrkH, mrkI, mrkJ
Type I fimbriae fimA, fimB, fimC, fimD, fimE, fimF, fimG, fimH, fimI, fimK
Type IV pili (Yersinia) pilW
Antiphagocytosis Capsule wiz
Efflux pump AcrAB acrA, acrB
Iron uptake Aerobactin iutA
Ent siderophore entA, entB, entC, entD, entE, entF, entS, fepA, fepB, fepC, fepD, fepG, fes
Salmochelin iroE, iroN
Yersiniabactin fyuA, irp1, irp2, ybtA, ybtE, ybtP, ybtQ, ybtS, ybtT, ybtU, ybtX
Regulation RcsAB rcsA, rcsB
Secretion system T6SS-I clpV/tssH, dotU/tssL, hcp/tssD, icmF/tssM, impA/tssA, ompA, sciN/tssJ, tssF, tssG, vasE/tssK, vgrG/tssI, vipA/tssB, vipB/tssC
T6SS-II clpV, impH, impJ, sciN, vasA/impG
T6SS-III dotU, icmF, impA, impF, impG, impH, impJ, ompA, sciN, vgrG
Serum resistance LPS rfb locus rfb
Fimbrial adherence determinants Stb (Salmonella) stbA, stbB, stbC, stbD
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giufrè, M.; Errico, G.; Del Grosso, M.; Pagnotta, M.; Palazzotti, B.; Ballardini, M.; Pantosti, A.; Meledandri, M.; Monaco, M. Detection of KPC-216, a Novel KPC-3 Variant, in a Clinical Isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 Co-Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060507

AMA Style

Giufrè M, Errico G, Del Grosso M, Pagnotta M, Palazzotti B, Ballardini M, Pantosti A, Meledandri M, Monaco M. Detection of KPC-216, a Novel KPC-3 Variant, in a Clinical Isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 Co-Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(6):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giufrè, Maria, Giulia Errico, Maria Del Grosso, Michela Pagnotta, Bernardetta Palazzotti, Milva Ballardini, Annalisa Pantosti, Marcello Meledandri, and Monica Monaco. 2024. "Detection of KPC-216, a Novel KPC-3 Variant, in a Clinical Isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 Co-Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol" Antibiotics 13, no. 6: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060507

APA Style

Giufrè, M., Errico, G., Del Grosso, M., Pagnotta, M., Palazzotti, B., Ballardini, M., Pantosti, A., Meledandri, M., & Monaco, M. (2024). Detection of KPC-216, a Novel KPC-3 Variant, in a Clinical Isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 Co-Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol. Antibiotics, 13(6), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060507

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop