Next Article in Journal
Hydroquinine Enhances the Efficacy of Contact Lens Solutions for Inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of COVID-19 on Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria at a Slovenian Tertiary Medical Center
Previous Article in Journal
CLSM-Guided Imaging for Quantifying Endodontic Disinfection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards Antibiotic Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Eastern Region of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Ocean between the Waves: Trends in Antimicrobial Consumption in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19

Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010055
by Xavier Durà-Miralles 1,2, Gabriela Abelenda-Alonso 1,2,3,*, Alba Bergas 1,2, Júlia Laporte-Amargós 1,2, Enric Sastre-Escolà 1,2,3, Ariadna Padullés 3,4, Jordi Carratalà 1,2,3,5 and Carlota Gudiol 1,2,3,5,6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010055
Submission received: 7 December 2023 / Revised: 29 December 2023 / Accepted: 3 January 2024 / Published: 5 January 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

     1. Durà-Miralles et al. performed a single-center cross-sectional study that analyzed antibiotic use in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized patients across four waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. In their study, they identified and compared the percentage of patients who received antibiotics, with the primary outcome being the average days of antibiotic treatment per 100 patients. This is an interesting study. However, it is limited by being a single-center study, and therefore the findings are not generalizable. The authors need to put the findings into a more global context. Specifically, how the study shall appear to a reader from another city/country.

 

2.       The authors may need to indicate whether they have established any exclusion criteria for the sample.

 

3.       Line 221: “The antimicrobial use during the different COVID-19 waves, expressed in days of therapy (DOT) per 100 patient-day”. Is this a commonly used endpoint (if so, please cite the proper references), or one that was established by the authors?

 

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

I urge the authors to reread the manuscript carefully and correct any writing error. Examples below:

Please correct the typos: Line 16 “doe to a high prescription rate”. Line 154: “Levofloxacin was recommended of in patients”.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

Congratulations on your work and hard work. The paper has high potential to garner interest from microbiologists, public health epidemiologists, and infectologists in the region and beyond. However, the paper needs to be improved, especially methodological descriptions needs to be enhanced.

1. Please add definition of wave or better add a pictorial histogram/time series showing the waves of patients in the hospitals.

2. Also can add a table regarding the wave characteristics like number of days of the wave, highest and lowest hospitalizations per day, cumulative hospitalizations, average number of days of hospitalizations, lowest and highest ICU admissions to help understand the differences in waves better.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English is fine. Minor grammatical corrections are needed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Accept.

Back to TopTop