Next Article in Journal
Interconnected Set of Enzymes Provide Lysine Biosynthetic Intermediates and Ornithine Derivatives as Key Precursors for the Biosynthesis of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci (MRS) and Mammaliicocci (MRM) in Dromedary Camels from Algeria: First Detection of SCCmec-mecC Hybrid in Methicillin-Resistant Mammaliicoccus lentus
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of Community- and Hospital- Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates during COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of Aromatic Plant-Derived Essential Oils for the Control of Foodborne Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance in Animal Production: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Penicillin-Binding Proteins Alterations and β-Lactams Non-Susceptibility of Diseased Pig-Isolated Streptococcus suis

by
Kamonwan Lunha
1,*,
Wiyada Chumpol
1,
Surasak Jiemsup
1,
Sukuma Samngamnim
2,
Pornchalit Assavacheep
2 and
Suganya Yongkiettrakul
1,*
1
National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(1), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010158
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance in Animal and Zoonotic Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Streptococcus suis is a zoonotic pathogen causing disease in both animals and humans, and the emergence of increasingly resistant bacteria to antimicrobial agents has become a significant challenge globally. The objective of this study was to investigate the genetic basis for declining susceptibility to penicillin and other β-lactams among S. suis. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and penicillin-binding proteins (PBP1a, PBP2a, PBP2b, and PBP2x) sequence analysis were performed on 225 S. suis isolated from diseased pigs. This study found that a growing trend of isolates displayed reduced susceptibility to β-lactams including penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and cephalosporins. A total of 342 substitutions within the transpeptidase domain of four PBPs were identified, of which 18 substitutions were most statistically associated with reduced β-lactams susceptibility. Almost all the S. suis isolates which exhibited penicillin-non-susceptible phenotype (71.9%) had single nucleotide polymorphisms, leading to alterations of PBP1a (P409T) and PBP2a (T584A and H588Y). The isolates may manifest a higher level of penicillin resistance by additional mutation of M341I in the 339STMK active site motif of PBP2x. The ampicillin-non-susceptible isolates shared the mutations in PBP1a (P409T) and PBP2a (T584A and H588Y) with additional alterations of PBP2b (T625R) and PBP2x (T467S). The substitutions, including PBP1a (M587S/T), PBP2a (M433T), PBP2b (I428L), and PBP2x (Q405E/K/L), appeared to play significant roles in mediating the reduction in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid susceptibility. Among the cephalosporins, specific mutations strongly associated with the decrease in cephalosporins susceptibility were observed for ceftiofur: PBP1a (S477D/G), PBP2a (E549Q and A568S), PBP2b (T625R), and PBP2x (Q453H). It is concluded that there was genetically widespread presence of PBPs substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics.

1. Introduction

Streptococcus suis is one of the most common Gram-positive cocci that usually colonizes the upper respiratory tract of pigs and can cause respiratory and systemic diseases, particularly in the postweaning period. In addition, it is also a serious zoonotic infection, causing meningitis and toxic shock-like syndrome. Most of the S. suis infection cases occurred in Asian countries, especially in China, Vietnam, and Thailand [1].
Although autogenous vaccines are used in pig farms, they are serotype-specific and give inconsistent cross protection against heterogeneous S. suis [1]. Antimicrobials remain the critical treatment for S. suis infection. Antibiotic consumption is extensively used in the livestock sector, especially for pigs [2,3]. The most commonly used antibiotics in the swine industry are amoxicillin, enrofloxacin, tetracycline, and penicillin [3].
Major empirical antimicrobial drugs for treating Streptococcus spp. infection are β-lactams such as penicillin and cephalosporins, which target penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), cell wall transpeptidase catalyzing the crosslink of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan [4]. In PBPs, three conserved motifs, SXXK (with the active site serine), SXN, and KT(S)G found in transpeptidase domain (TPD) form the catalytic center. The β-lactams function by covalently binding to the active site serine through the β-lactam ring, thereby interfering with the synthesis of bacterial cell walls and leading to bacterial cell death [5,6]. However, Streptococcus pathogens with β-lactams resistance are continually found worldwide [4,5,7]. The main mechanism of β-lactams resistance is alterations in the transpeptidase of PBPs, leading to low affinity to β-lactams, which thus confers resistance [4,5,6].
As for S. pneumoniae, S. suis has four key PBPs including PBP1a, 2a, 2b, and 2x. However, while several studies have described the genetic profile of TPD of PBPs in association with β-lactams resistance in S. pneumoniae, only limited data are available on S. suis isolates [4,5,6]. A high degree of distinctiveness was observed over the different geographical areas, by taking into account the different environmental pressures, management of antibiotic prescription, and health conditions [1,8]. Therefore, more understanding of mutations within the PBPs and their relation to β-lactams resistance in S. suis isolates, specifically from an endemic area, is critical. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between specific TPD of PBPs alterations and β-lactams-non-susceptible in S. suis isolated from diseased pigs in Thailand.

2. Results

2.1. Characteristics of S. suis Isolates

S. suis 225 isolates were identified, based on ≥95% identity of specific recombination/repair protein (recN) nucleotide sequences and ≥94% average nucleotide identity (ANI) to the reference strain, S. suis P1/7, AM946016.1. The multiplex PCR reaction and WGS analysis differentiated 195 S. suis isolates with specific serotype and 30 isolates with non-typeable (NT) serotype. Among the 195 serotypeable isolates, 24 serotypes were identified. No S. suis isolates with serotype 6, 12, 13, 17, and 19 were found in this study. The top five serotypes were: 2 (25.8%, 58/225), 8 (8.4%, 19/225), 29 (7.6%, 17/225), 9 (6.2%, 14/225), and 3 (5.3%, 12/225). The serotypes 2 and 8 were major serotypes found in lung isolates, accounting for 25.0% (46/184) and 10.3% (19/184), respectively (Table S1).

2.2. Distribution of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

The distribution of β-lactam MICs is shown in Figure 1 and Table S2. β-lactams-non-susceptible S. suis was defined by the MIC breakpoint values for the interpretation of resistance and intermediate susceptibility. The result showed that there were 68.0% (153/225) of the isolates classified as penicillin (PEN)-non-susceptible S. suis (MIC of 0.5–>8 µg/mL), including PEN-resistant S. suis with MIC of 1–>8 µg/mL (50.2%, 113/225) and PEN-intermediate S. suis with MIC of 0.5 µg/mL (17.8%, 40/225). The prevalence of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) and ampicillin (AMP)-non-susceptible S. suis isolates (MIC of 4/2–>16/8 and 1–>16 µg/mL, respectively) was about 19.1% (43/225) and 30.7% (69/225), respectively.
The prevalence of non-susceptible S. suis isolates to the second-generation cephalosporins, cefuroxime (CXM) was 66.7% (150/225). Among the third-generation cephalosporins, S. suis exhibited non-susceptibility to ceftiofur (FUR) with the lowest prevalence (12.4%, 28/225), followed by cefotaxime (CTX) (58.2%, 131/225) and ceftriaxone (CRO) (61.3%, 138/225). Whereas the presence of isolates resistant to the fourth-generation cephalosporin, cefepime (CPM) (30.2%, 68/225), was found.

2.3. Alterations of Penicillin-Binding Proteins

In this study, amino acid alterations of transpeptidase domain (TPD) of four penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), PBP1a, PBP2a, PBP2b, and PBP2x, were observed from the 225 S. suis isolates. The TPD of PBP1a (position no. 335–599, 265 amino acids), PBP2a (position no. 372–616, 245 amino acids), PBP2b (position no. 351–681, 331 amino acids), and PBP2x (position no. 256–619, 364 amino acids) possess highly conserved active site motifs 374STMK˗470SSN˗561KTG, 412STIK˗467SYN˗592KTG, 393SIVK˗449SSN˗622KTG, and 339STMK˗396SSN˗548KSG, respectively (Figure 2). Compared with the S. suis reference strain P1/7 (AM946016.1), a total of 342 mutation sites (98, 35, 65, and 144 sites in PBP1a, PBP2a, PBP2b, and PBP2x, respectively) was identified within the TPD of all four PBPs. Throughout the entire TPD of individual PBPs, multiple amino acid alterations were observed at various positions, PBP1a (0–55 residues), PBP2a (0–22 residues), PBP2b (1–38 residues), and PBP2x (1–109 residues) (Table S3a–d, respectively).
According to the analysis of PBP1a of all S. suis isolates, the P409T was the most common substitution (54.7%, 123/225), followed by N459A/D, K522E/Q/S, and K525Q/R (44.9%, 101/225 each), and S477D/G (42.7%, 96/225) (Figure 2). Based on the distribution of various substitutions, the PBP1a alterations were classified into 27 different patterns of which the substitution rate was varied (0–20.8%). PBP1a type 1a-3 consisting of two amino acid substitution sites (E447A/D and A493S/T) was the most common alteration pattern (22.7%, 51/225) (Table S3a).
The analysis of PBP2a of all S. suis isolates demonstrated that the most common substitution was A561P/S, accounting for 97.8% (220/225) of the isolates, followed by T584A (55.1%, 124/225), H588Y (54.7%, 123/225), A434P/S (48.9%, 110/225), T523A, T581S, A585T (46.2%, 104/225 each), V504A, A522S, K527D, T578L, I589L (45.8%, 103/225 each), E549Q, and A568S (45.3%, 102/225 each) (Figure 2). There were 29 alteration patterns for PBP2a with 0–9.0% substitution rate. PBP2a type 2a-4 consisting of three amino acid alterations (V390I, A434P/S, and A561P/S) was the most common alteration pattern (21.3%, 48/225) (Table S3b).
Analysis of PBP2b revealed 62 substitution sites and 3 deletion sites along the 331 amino acids (positions 351 to 681) of TPD. The Y435del, was only found in one strain, whereas T671del and G433del were observed in 13.3% (30/225) and 76.0% (171/225) of S. suis isolates, respectively. The most common substitution was I414V (100%, 225/225), which was present in all the isolates, followed by Y432W, G433del (76.0%, 171/225 each), I452A/S/V (74.2%, 167/225), K479T, D512E, K513E, T515S (73.8%, 166/225 each), D587E (73.3%, 165/225), T625R (60.4%, 136/225), N356E (56.4%, 127/225), T376E/S (54.2%, 122/225), S374A/T (53.3%, 120/225), S375G (49.3%, 111/225), K674N (47.1%, 106/225), T521M, A562P (45.3%, 102/225 each), A539V, I542V, T547K (44.9%, 101/225 each), and E568D (43.6%, 98/225) (Figure 2). The PBP2b alterations found in all isolates were classified into 51 different PBP2b patterns with 0.3–11.5% substitution rate. Among them, PBP2b type 2b-16 consisting of 15 amino acid alterations was the most common alteration pattern (11.1%, 25/225) (Table S3c).
The analysis of PBP2x of all S. suis isolates revealed V494I/L was the most predominant (82.2%, 185/225), followed by Y382E/K/M (80.9%, 182/225), N284K/T, S450T, T551S, T491S (77.8%, 175/225 each), Y525F (76.9%, 173/225), R600D/E/N (76.4%, 172/225), Y389F/M (75.6%, 170/225), Q407E/K (75.1%, 169/225), N595S/T (74.7%, 168/225), T418A (73.8%, 166/225), D541E/N, S556G/K (71.1%, 160/225 each), V547M (69.8%, 157/225), I568L/T (64.0%, 144/225), D601S/T (62.7%, 141/225), F422Y (61.8%, 139/225), S496A/K/T (56.0%, 126/225), R288K, Q560L/T (54.2%, 122/225 each), Q321A/D/E, I474T/V (53.3%, 120/225 each), S495A (49.3%, 111/225), M437L, S445T (48.9%, 110/225 each), R514D/G, L533T/V (45.3%, 102/225 each), and T467S (42.2%, 95/225) (Figure 2). In addition, N442Del was observed in almost all S. suis isolates (99.6%, 224/225). According to the distribution of various substitutions in PBP2x, all isolates could be differentiated into 59 types with 0.3–29.9% substitution rate. The most common alteration pattern of PBP2x was type 2x-25 (22.7%, 51/225) consisting of 27 substitution sites (Table S3d).

2.4. Impact of PBP Substitutions on β-Lactams Susceptibility

In an attempt to identify the impact of PBP substitutions on β-lactams susceptibility of S. suis, this study focused on the PBP substitutions that significantly differentiated between β-lactams-susceptible and β-lactams-non-susceptible isolates (>50%) and only found in β-lactams-non-susceptible S. suis isolates with high frequency (>70%). A total of 47 candidate residues were selected, including PBP1a (6 substitutions), PBP2a (17 substitutions), PBP2b (8 substitutions), and PBP2x (16 substitutions), that were postulated to mediate the decrease in β-lactams susceptibility. It is important to note that the PBP2x M341I was included in this study, due to the significance of the mutation in 339STMK active site motif (Figure 3 and Table S4). The relationship of all 48 selected candidate residues to β-lactams-non-susceptible phenotype was interrogated by risk ratio analysis. There were 18 amino acid substitutions with the highest risk ratio, exhibiting significant association with reduced β-lactams susceptibility (Figure 4).
Among the PEN-non-susceptible isolates, an increase in RR was observed for PBP1a P409T, PBP2a P584A, and PBP2a P588Y, while amino acid substitutions in PBP2b and PBP2x exhibited low RR (<2.0). Similar substitutions in PBP1a (P409T) and PBP2a (P584A and P588Y) were also associated with the decrease in AMP susceptibility. Moreover, PBP2b T625R and PBP2x T467S exhibiting high RR (14 and 22, respectively) were found in AMP-non-susceptible isolates. The relationship between PBP substitutions, PBP1a M587S/T, PBP2a M433T, PBP2b I428L, and PBP2x Q405E/K/L, and AMC-non-susceptible isolates was demonstrated with the highest RR (44.4, 31.9, 28.3, and 35.8, respectively) (Figure 3 and Table S5).
In this study, the strongest association between PBP substitutions and the decrease in cephalosporins susceptibility was reported. Only one substitution, PBP2x Y525F was significantly associated with CXM-non-susceptibility in S. suis (RR = 6.1). Five PBP substitutions, PBP1a S477D/G, PBP2a E549Q, PBP2a A568S, PBP2b T625R, and PBP2x Q453H, significantly contributed to the decrease in FUR susceptibility. CRO-non-susceptibility of S. suis isolates notably harboring PBP2b T625R and PBP2x Y525F. The PBP1a M587S/T, PBP2b T625R, and PBP2x Y525F substitutions were significantly associated with CTX-non-susceptibility of S. suis isolates. Several PBP substitutions, PBP1a K522E/Q/S, PBP1a K525Q/R, PBP2a T523A, PBP2b I428L, and PBP2x Q405E/K/L significantly contributed to the decrease in CPM susceptibility of S. suis isolates. In this study, the risk ratio analysis could not be conducted for the association between PBP substitutions, PBP1a (P409T), PBP2a (T584A and H588Y), and PBP2x (Y389F/M, Q405E/K/L, Q407E/K, M437L, S445T, T467S, R514D/G, Y525F, and S556G/K), and FUR-non-susceptible S. suis, due to none of the FUR-non-susceptibility of S. suis isolates without PBP substitutions (Figure 3 and Table S5).

3. Discussion

S. suis infection has been shown to have a significant economic loss on the swine production system and an emerging zoonotic infection that commonly causes adult bacterial meningitis in Southeast Asian countries [1]. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistant S. suis has increased worldwide, likely due to the selective pressure of widespread uses of antibiotics in both veterinary and human medicine. The rising trend of antimicrobial resistant S. suis signals is an alarming global health problem.
The worldwide antimicrobial resistance data reveal that the resistance prevalence of S. suis can be highly variable, depending on the geographical location, management of antibiotic prescription, and health condition [1,8]. Among the S. suis strains isolated in this study, the majority were serotypes 2 (25.8%), 8 (8.4%), and 29 (7.6%). These serotypes have been known to colonize the upper respiratory tract of healthy carriers for long periods [7]. Even if S. suis is not always targeted, it can be exposed to massive amounts of antibiotics used to eradicate weaning diarrhea, intestinal infections, and respiratory disease in swine production. These may potentially lead to the development of widespread antibiotic resistance [3,4,7].
β-lactams (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, and penicillin) are still the drug of choice for the treatment of S. suis infection; meanwhile, a large body of knowledge shows the growing trend of the isolates resistant to penicillin (0–27%), ampicillin (0.6–23%), and ceftiofur (0–23%) [1,7,8,9]. The findings from this study are consistent with the previous literature. Moreover, this study has demonstrated isolates with a higher rate of penicillin resistance (50.2%). Compared to low penicillin MIC50 (≤0.03–0.25 µg/mL) and MIC90 (0.25–2 µg/mL) reported from many countries [10,11,12], our study revealed relatively high penicillin MIC50 (1.0 µg/mL) and MIC90 (>8.0 µg/mL). In addition, it emerged that S. suis isolates displayed reduced susceptibility to ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and cephalosporins.
Variations within PBPs, especially the residues adjacent to or within the three active site motifs: SXXK, SXN and KXG of TPD, are the major resistance mechanism responsible for reduced β-lactams susceptibility in streptococci. The level of resistance is likely increased along with the degree of amino acid changes in PBPs. It has been suggested that changes in PBP2b are responsible for penicillin, PBP2x gene mutations are selected by cefotaxime, while high-level resistance is achieved with additional changes in PBP1a [5].
In this study, the analysis of amino acid sequences of S. suis PBPs revealed a high degree of genetic diversity among all four PBPs. The numbers of amino acid variations in PBP2a (22 residues) and PBP2b (38 residues) were comparable, while that of PBP1a was high (55 residues), and the greatest numbers of amino acid variations can be found in PBP2x (109 residues). A three-dimensional structure has revealed S. pneumoniae PBP2x as the primary target undergoing the amino acid modification under antibiotic pressure [13]. Therefore, the higher probability of β-lactams resistance in S. suis might be mediated by the higher numbers of amino acid alterations in PBP2x.
It has been reported that T371A/S substitution of PBP1a 370STMK active site motif led to a reorientation of the serine residue, resulting in high-level resistance against PEN and cephalosporins in S. pneumoniae isolates [14,15]. In this study, no amino acid substitution at 370STMK active site motif of PBP1a was identified; however, two PEN-resistant S. suis isolates with MIC ≥ 8 µg/mL harboring the T562S mutation at PBP1a 561KTG active site motif together with other mutations was found. The data suggested that the accumulation of PBP1a mutations in the active site motifs and the other regions might be able to elevate the degree of PEN resistance in the S. suis population.
A recent study has reported two human patient-isolated S. suis strains with intermediate resistance to PEN, harboring PBP1a P409T, PBP2b T584A, and PBP2b H588Y, found in northern Thailand [16]. This study reported the same triple substitutions found in 122 diseased-pig S. suis isolated from central Thailand, of which 109 isolates exhibited PEN-non-susceptibility (12 isolates of PEN-intermediate resistance and 97 isolates of PEN-resistance). The presence of the same triple substitution in S. suis strains isolated from different sources and regions suggested widespread prevalence of triple mutant variants of S. suis in Thailand.
In this study, the RR analysis revealed the association between PBP1a mutations and reduced β-lactams susceptibility (Figure 3); however, there were some S. suis isolates that harbored those mutations without becoming non-susceptible. The association between PBP1a P409T mutation and reduced PEN susceptibility was significant (RR = 2.1); however, there were 18.1% of PEN-susceptible isolates exhibiting a slightly increased PEN MIC value (0.06–0.25 µg/mL) that also harbored the PBP1a P409T mutation. This PBP1a P409T significantly displayed a strong relationship with reduced susceptibility to AMP (RR = 18.2) and AMC (RR = 17.0). Among the PBP1a mutations, the M587S/T substitution was predicted to have the largest impact on reduced susceptibility to AMC (RR = 44.4) and CTX (RR = 2.1); however, some isolates with AMC and CTX susceptibility also carried these mutations. The PBP1a S477D/G likely contributed to the decrease in FUR susceptibility (RR = 17.5), and the coexistence of PBP1a K522E/Q/S and K525Q/R might have a strong relationship with the decrease in susceptibility to fourth generation cephalosporin CPM (RR = 6.4); however, these mutations could also be found in cephalosporin-susceptible isolates. Hence, it could be suggested that the presence of PBP1a mutations alone might not be sufficient to obtain the β-lactams-non-susceptibility, but they could contribute to increasing the MIC level and the stepwise accumulation of several mutations in the PBP1a and other PBPs could eventually lead to β-lactams-resistant phenotype for S. suis.
A few cases of substitutions in PBP2a have been found to contribute to the β-lactams resistance in streptococci. Notably, T411A substitution within the active site serine at 410STIK motif has been observed in S. pneumoniae isolates [5] and PBP2a T397A substitution has been reported in oxacillin-resistant S. uberis from Canada and the UK [17]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of mutations nearby PBP2a 592KTG conserved motif, and T584A and H588Y substitutions in PEN-non-susceptible S. suis isolated from diseased pigs. In this study, the presence of PBP2a T584A and PBP2a H588Y mutations was also related to increased AMP MIC level. However, due to a relatively low binding affinity between PBP2a and b-lactams, it has been suggested that under drug pressure, the PBP1a mutations are primarily selected before PBP2a becomes a factor in the resistance development [5].
Previous studies have shown that the most significant mutations in PBP2b include the T446A substitution in proximity to the 443SSN motif displaying a 60% reduction in penicillin affinity in S. pneumoniae. Due to the side chain of T446 contributing to stabilizing polar and hydrophobic interactions of residues surrounding the active site, the T446A mutation could perturb structural integrity around the 443SSN active site motif [18]. However, this mutation can also be found in PEN susceptible S. pneumoniae isolates [19]. In this study, amino acid substitution PBP2b I452A/S/V adjacent to 451SSN motif, was observed in both PEN-non-susceptible (90.2%) and PEN-susceptible (40.3%) isolates. Other common PBP2b substitutions, including K479T, D512E, K513E, and T515S were also identified. These mutations have been reported to be related to PEN-resistant S. suis strains isolated in the major pig-producing regions, the UK, Canada, and Vietnam [20]. It is likely that these PBP2b substitutions may also play a part in the reduction in PEN susceptibility in S. suis strains isolated in Thailand.
None of the isolates in this study had amino acid changes in the three active site motifs of PBP2a and PBP2b and there was only one mutation, M341I in the active site 339STMK of PBP2x. High-level PEN-resistant isolates with MIC of ≥8.0 µg/mL were found in 31 S. suis isolates (31/153, 20.3%), of which the PBP2x substitution rate was high. Although M341I substitution in the 339STMK conserve motif of PBP2x was not abundant among PEN-non-susceptible S. suis isolates, the presence of M341I was strongly associated with high-level PEN-resistant isolates (MIC of ≥8.0 µg/mL). Our results are in agreement with those previously reported by Hu et al. [21], which showed that the alteration of M341I in PBP2x (equivalent to M339 and M342 of S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes PBP2x, respectively) was a key mutation responsible for β-lactams resistance in pig-isolated S. suis strain R61 (MIC of >4 µg/mL) in China. In addition, S. pneumoniae containing T338A together with M339F substitutions caused a distortion of the active site serine (S337), leading to a 4–10-fold reduction in the reaction rate with β-lactams. As a result, S. pneumoniae with PBP2x T338A and M339F exhibited high-level resistance against β-lactams [5,22]. It is likely that the M341I substitution in PBP2x could be a PEN-resistant determinant to elevate the high PEN MIC level.
However, the limitation in this study was that the association of the mutations in TPD of PBBs with PEN and other β-lactams susceptibility was based on the statistical analysis only. While this study revealed mutations in that the PBP were statistically associated with β-lactams-non-susceptible phenotype, several novel mutations were identified from our S. suis population. The exact roles of those alterations responsible for β-lactams susceptibility in S. suis require further investigation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Streptococcus suis Isolates

A total of 225 non-duplicate S. suis isolates were recovered from diseased pigs between the years of 2018 to 2020, kindly obtained from Assistant Professor Dr. Pornchalit Assavacheep, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University. Most of them were isolated from lung tissue (81.8%, 184/225), followed by brain tissue (8.0%, 18/225), nasal swab (4.4%, 10/225), and joint drainage (2.2%, 5/225). Other specimen types included blood, spleen tissues, vaginal swab, pleural effusion, and tongue swab, each accounting for ≤1.0% of the isolates (Table S1). The clinical strains were isolated on Columbia blood agar with 5% sheep blood at 37 °C in 5% CO2 overnight. The isolates with alpha hemolytic colonies were further identified by conventional biochemical tests [23]. All presumptive S. suis isolates were then confirmed to be S. suis by the PCR targeting the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) and the recombination/repair protein (recN) genes. In addition, S. suis serotypes were well characterized by using the multiplex PCR-based method. If the test strain was negative with all primers, it was classified as non-typeable (NT) as described in Lunha et al. [24].

4.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Assays

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of S. suis against penicillin (PEN) and other β-lactams including ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), cefuroxime (CXM), ceftiofur (FUR), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), and cefepime (CPM), were determined by the broth-microdilution method, using a commercially prepared Sensititre BOP06F and STP6F microdilution plates (Trek Diagnostic Systems Ltd., East Grinstead, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was applied as a quality control strain and the results were within the CLSI defined quality standards. The MIC results were interpreted by using CLSI veterinary breakpoints (CLSI Vet01S, 2020), EUCAST (EUCAST, 2020), and FDA (FDA, 2019), which were previously published by Lunha et al. [24]. The isolates showing intermediate susceptibility and resistance to each agent were classified as S. suis with non-susceptible to β-lactams.

4.3. DNA Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing

All isolates were grown overnight on Todd-Hewitt broth (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) at 37 °C in 5% CO2, and genomic DNA (gDNA) were extracted by cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [25] with minor modification. Briefly, cells were collected and resuspended in lysis buffer containing 2.4 mg/mL lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Bacterial cells were lysed in 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and 0.1 mg/mL proteinase K (Invitrogen). Proteins and polysaccharides were precipitated in 0.5 M NaCl and CTAB/NaCl (10% CTAB, 0.7 M NaCl). DNA purification was carried out by mixing with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol mixture (24:1) to separate contaminants into the organic phase and nucleic acid into the aqueous phase. The aqueous-phase solution was subjected to 0.1 mg/mL RNase A (Sigma Aldrich) treatment and absolute isopropanol was then added to precipitate the nucleic acids. The DNA precipitate was collected and washed with 70% ethanol. The gDNA was dried at 60 °C for 1 h and resuspended in 50 µL of distilled water. The S. suis gDNA purification was conducted using DNA Clean & Concentrator kit (Zymo research, Irvine, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All processed samples had a minimum DNA concentration of 30 ng/μL and OD260/OD280 in the range of 1.8–2.0 verified by the NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Samples were submitted to GeneWiz sequencing facility (GeneWiz Inc., Hangzhou, China) and sequenced on the HiSeq Illumina platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) generating ∼2 GB of 150 bp pair-end sequencing reads with >100X coverage.

4.4. Sequence Analysis

Assemblies and annotations were generated by open software, PATRIC database (Pathosystems Resource Integration Center-https: https://www.patricbrc.org, accessed on 7 November 2021), with default bioinformatics pipeline. Adapter and low-quality sequences were trimmed from the generated read sequences using Trim Galore with a sliding window quality cutoff of Q20. The de novo assembly was performed using Unicycler genome assembler with minimum contigs of 300 bp produced. Draft genomes were annotated using the RAST tool kit. The poor sequencing quality genomes with a large number of contigs (>1000), N50 values of <10,000 bp or that which were inconsistent with an S. suis genomes in the GenBank database were excluded from the analysis.
The full-length recombination/repair protein (recN) gene was extracted from the annotated genomes. The test isolates were confirmed as S. suis by having a ≥95% nucleotide identity to S. suis-specific recN sequence of the reference genome, S. suis P1/7, GenBank accession no. AM946016.1. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between the isolates and the reference genome was also calculated by FastANI v1.3 with cut-off of ≥94% identity [26]. S. suis serotype was confirmed using gene content of capsular polysaccharide (cps) loci. Two serotype pairs with similar sequence (2 or ½) and (1 or 14) were differentiated using the cpsK gene, a single-nucleotide (G→C/T) substitution at nucleotide position 483 in the case of serotype ½ and 1 [27].
The sequences of pbp genes, pbp1a, 2a, 2b, and 2x, were extracted from the studied isolates. The single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with amino acid substitution were identified by the multiple sequence alignment against the reference strain S. suis P1/7 (GenBank accession no. AM946016.1) using the ClastalW in MEGA-X [28].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using the STATA (version 14.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare the prevalence of various PBPs amino acid substitutions in different β-lactams susceptibility. The relationship between the specific PBPs alterations and β-lactams susceptibility phenotypes was also calculated, and the association was reported as a risk ratio (RR) [29]. A RR of >1 was considered as the increasing probability of the co-occurrence of the genotype being studied with the measured phenotype (positive association), while RR of <1 was considered as the decreasing probability of the co-occurrence of the genotype being studied with the measured phenotype (negative association). A candidate alteration with p-value < 0.05 was considered to be independently associated with reduce susceptibility of the β-lactam antibiotics and thus a likely causal variant for resistance.

5. Conclusions

This study has found widespread evidence for increased MIC of β-lactams in the zoonosis pathogen S. suis isolated from diseased pigs. A high genetic diversity was observed along the TPD of all four PBPs. The majority of isolates with an increased MIC value for PEN were found to possess the substitutions of PBP1a (P409T) and PBP2a (T584A and H588Y). An additional M341I mutation in 339STMK active site motif of PBP2x led to a higher level of PEN resistance (MIC of ≥8.0 µg/mL). The AMP-non-susceptibility was predicted to be related to the mutations of PBP1a (P409T), PBP2a (T584A and H588Y), PBP2b (T625R), and PBP2x (T467S). The mutations of PBP1a (M587S/T), PBP2a (M433T), PBP2b (I428L), and PBP2x (Q405E/K/L) potentially play significant roles in the decrease in AMC susceptibility. Among the cephalosporins, the major mutations associated with non-susceptible cephalosporins were observed against FUR including the mutations of PBP1a (S477D/G), PBP2a (E549Q and A568S), PBP2b (T625R), and PBP2x (Q453H). Given the high degree of PBP mutants in S. suis observed, our study suggests the potential for S. suis to accumulate more PBP mutations with continued selection pressure and become increasingly more resistance to β-lactams, which could severely threaten the swine production and reduced treatment efficacy in human.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics12010158/s1, Table S1: Distribution of S. suis serotypes in different sources of specimens; Table S2: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values distribution and resistance rates of S. suis isolates; Table S3a: Deduced amino acid alterations in transpeptidase domain (TPD) of penicillin-binding protein PBP1a; Table S3b: Deduced amino acid alterations in transpeptidase domain (TPD) of penicillin-binding protein PBP2a; Table S3c: Deduced amino acid alterations in transpeptidase domain (TPD) of penicillin-binding protein PBP2b; Table S3d: Deduced amino acid alterations in transpeptidase domain (TPD) of penicillin-binding protein PBP2x; Table S4: Amino acid substitutions within the transpeptidase domain (TPD) of penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) and number of S. suis isolates with each variant, and the percent different of variant between the isolates being non-susceptible (NS) and susceptible (S); Table S5: The association between PBPs amino acid substitutions and reduced susceptibility to β-lactams.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y., K.L., S.S. and P.A.; methodology, K.L., W.C. and S.J.; validation, S.Y., K.L., S.S. and P.A.; formal analysis, K.L. and W.C.; investigation, S.Y., S.S. and P.A.; resources, S.Y., S.S. and P.A.; data curation, K.L. and W.C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.L.; writing—review and editing, S.Y., K.L., W.C., S.J., S.S. and P.A.; visualization, S.Y., K.L., W.C. and S.J.; supervision, S.Y.; project administration, S.Y. and K.L.; funding acquisition, S.Y. and K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NSTDA RDI Research Grant, grant number P20-50-967 and the NSRF via Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development Research and Innovation, grant number B05F640141.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to Pornchalit Assavacheep and Sukuma Samngamnim, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, for kindly providing the S. suis isolates. The authors would like to thank Darin Kongkasuriyachai for her constructive discussion and internal reviews of this study. We are grateful to Potjanee Srimanote for providing S. pneumoniae ATCC 49618 reference strain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Segura, M.; Aragon, V.; Brockmeier, S.L.; Gebhart, C.; Greeff, A.; Kerdsin, A.; O’Dea, M.A.; Okura, M.; Saléry, M.; Schultsz, C.; et al. Update on Streptococcus suis research and prevention in the era of antimicrobial restriction: 4th international workshop on S. suis. Pathogens 2020, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tiseo, K.; Huber, L.; Gilbert, M.; Robinson, T.P.; Van Boeckel, T.P. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lekagul, A.; Tangcharoensathien, V.; Yeung, S. The use of antimicrobials in global pig production: A systematic review of methods for quantification. Prev. Vet. Med. 2018, 160, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dechêne-Tempier, M.; Marois-Créhan, C.; Libante, V.; Jouy, E.; Leblond-Bourget, N.; Payot, S. Update on the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and the mobile resistome in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hakenbeck, R.; Brückner, R.; Denapaite, D.; Maurer, P. Molecular mechanisms of β-lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 395–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zapun, A.; Contreras-Martel, C.; Vernet, T. Penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactam resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Petrocchi-Rilo, M.; Martínez-Martínez, S.; Aguarón-Turrientes, Á.; Roca-Martínez, E.; García-Iglesias, M.J.; Pérez-Fernández, E.; González-Fernández, A.; Herencia-Lagunar, E.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. Anatomical site; typing; virulence gene profiling; antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance genes of Streptococcus suis isolates recovered from pigs in Spain. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tan, M.F.; Tan, J.; Zeng, Y.B.; Li, H.Q.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, R. Antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes of Streptococcus suis isolated from clinically healthy pigs from 2017 to 2019 in Jiangxi Province; China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yongkiettrakul, S.; Maneerat, K.; Arechanajan, B.; Malila, Y.; Srimanote, P.; Gottschalk, M.; Visessanguan, W. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs; asymptomatic pigs; and human patients in Thailand. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hernandez-Garcia, J.; Wang, J.; Restif, O.; Holmes, M.A.; Mather, A.E.; Weinert, L.A.; Wileman, T.M.; Thomson, J.R.; Langford, P.R.; Wren, B.W.; et al. Patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus suis isolates from pigs with or without streptococcal disease in England between 2009 and 2014. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 207, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hayer, S.S.; Rovira, A.; Olsen, K.; Johnson, T.J.; Vannucci, F.; Rendahl, A.; Perez, A.; Alvarez, J. Prevalence and time trend analysis of antimicrobial resistance in respiratory bacterial pathogens collected from diseased pigs in USA between 2006-2016. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 128, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vilaró, A.; Novell, E.; Enrique-Tarancon, V.; Balielles, J.; Migura-García, L.; Fraile, L. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of porcine bacterial pathogens: Investigating the prospect of testing a representative drug for each antimicrobial family. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pares, S.; Mouz, N.; Pétillot, Y.; Hakenbeck, R.; Dideberg, O. X-ray structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae PBP2x, a primary penicillin target enzyme. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1996, 3, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Varghese, R.; Neeravi, A.; Subramanian, N.; Baskar, P.; Anandhan, K.; Veeraraghavan, B. Analysis of amino acid sequences of penicillin-binding proteins 1a, 2b, and 2x in invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae non-susceptible to penicillin isolated from children in India. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y. Molecular characteristics of penicillin-binding protein 2b; 2x and 1a sequences in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing invasive diseases among children in Northeast China. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 35, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bamphensin, N.; Chopjitt, P.; Hatrongjit, R.; Boueroy, P.; Fittipaldi, N.; Gottschalk, M.; Kerdsin, A. Non-penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus suis isolated from humans. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. McDougall, S.; Clausen, L.; Ha, H.J.; Gibson, I.; Bryan, M.; Hadjirin, N.; Lay, E.; Raisen, C.; Ba, X.; Restif, O.; et al. Mechanisms of β-lactam resistance of Streptococcus uberis isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 242, 108592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pagliero, E.; Chesnel, L.; Hopkins, J.; Croizé, J.; Dideberg, O.; Vernet, T.; Di Guilmi, A.M. Biochemical characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae penicillin-binding protein 2b and its implication in β-lactam resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1848–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Granger, D.; Boily-Larouche, G.; Turgeon, P.; Weiss, K.; Roger, M. Molecular characteristics of pbp1a and pbp2b in clinical Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Quebec; Canada. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 57, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hadjirin, N.F.; Miller, E.L.; Murray, G.G.R.; Yen, P.L.K.; Phuc, H.D.; Wileman, T.M.; Hernandez-Garcia, J.; Williamson, S.M.; Parkhill, J.; Maskell, D.J.; et al. Large-scale genomic analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, P.; Yang, M.; Zhang, A.; Wu, J.; Chen, B.; Hua, Y.; Yu, J.; Chen, H.; Xiao, J.; Jin, M. Comparative genomics study of multi-drug-resistance mechanisms in the antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus suis R61 strain. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Chesnel, L.; Pernot, L.; Lemaire, D.; Champelovier, D.; Croizé, J.; Dideberg, O.; Vernet, T.; Zapun, A. The structural modifications induced by the M339F substitution in PBP2x from Streptococcus pneumoniae further decreases the susceptibility to β-lactams of resistant strains. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 44448–44456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tarradas, C.; Arenas, A.; Maldonado, A.; Luque, I.; Miranda, A.; Perea, A. Identification of Streptococcus suis isolated from swine: Proposal for biochemical parameters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 322, 578580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lunha, K.; Chumpol, W.; Samngamnim, S.; Jiemsup, S.; Assavacheep, P.; Yongkiettrakul, S. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs in Thailand, 2018–2020. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wilson, K. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2001, 56, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Werinder, A.; Aspán, A.; Söderlund, R.; Backhans, A.; Sjölund, M.; Guss, B.; Jacobson, M. Whole-Genome sequencing evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS as a species identification tool for Streptococcus suis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e0129721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Matiasovic, J.; Zouharova, M.; Nedbalcova, K.; Kralova, N.; Matiaskova, K.; Simek, B.; Kucharovicova, I.; Gottschalk, M. Resolution of Streptococcus suis serotypes 1/2 versus 2 and 1 versus 14 by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e00480-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Viera, A.J. Odds ratios and risk ratios: What’s the difference and why does it matter? South Med. J. 2008, 101, 730–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MIC distributions of β-lactam antibiotics for the 225 S. suis isolates. The frequencies of different MICs for each of the β-lactams tested were tabulated as a percentage of isolates (%) with a particular MIC value (µg/mL) for penicillin (a), ampicillin (b), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (c), cefuroxime (d), ceftiofur (e), ceftriaxone (f), cefotaxime (g), and cefepime (h). The color of bar charts indicates interpretive range for each of the antibiotics; susceptible (green), intermediate (yellow), and resistant (red). MIC50 and MIC90, the MIC which inhibit 50% and 90% of the isolates tested, respectively, were also indicated.
Figure 1. MIC distributions of β-lactam antibiotics for the 225 S. suis isolates. The frequencies of different MICs for each of the β-lactams tested were tabulated as a percentage of isolates (%) with a particular MIC value (µg/mL) for penicillin (a), ampicillin (b), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (c), cefuroxime (d), ceftiofur (e), ceftriaxone (f), cefotaxime (g), and cefepime (h). The color of bar charts indicates interpretive range for each of the antibiotics; susceptible (green), intermediate (yellow), and resistant (red). MIC50 and MIC90, the MIC which inhibit 50% and 90% of the isolates tested, respectively, were also indicated.
Antibiotics 12 00158 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram displaying the conserved active site motifs of transpeptidase domain (TPD) in penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of S. suis and most common mutation sites observed among the 225 S. suis isolates. The conserved active site motifs are marked by black triangles. The alteration sites of PBPs with >40% prevalence are indicated below.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram displaying the conserved active site motifs of transpeptidase domain (TPD) in penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of S. suis and most common mutation sites observed among the 225 S. suis isolates. The conserved active site motifs are marked by black triangles. The alteration sites of PBPs with >40% prevalence are indicated below.
Antibiotics 12 00158 g002
Figure 3. Risk ratio (RR) between candidate PBPs substitutions and β-lactams-non-susceptible phenotypes. Note only those 47 candidate substitutions with significantly differentiated β-lactams-susceptible and β-lactams-non-susceptible isolates (>50%) and found in β-lactams-non-susceptible S. suis isolates with high frequency (>70%), and M341I in 339STMK motif of PBP2x, are listed. Positive associations (RR > 1) are visualized in purple blocks and negative associations (RR < 1) in yellow blocks. Color intensity of the text labels represents proportional to the risk ratio. AMC, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid; AMP, Ampicillin; CPM, Cefepime; CRO, Ceftriaxone; CTX, Cefotaxime; CXM, cefuroxime; FUR, Ceftiofur; PEN, Penicillin. ND, the risk ratio analysis could not be determined, due to none of the FUR-non-susceptible S. suis isolates without PBP substitutions.
Figure 3. Risk ratio (RR) between candidate PBPs substitutions and β-lactams-non-susceptible phenotypes. Note only those 47 candidate substitutions with significantly differentiated β-lactams-susceptible and β-lactams-non-susceptible isolates (>50%) and found in β-lactams-non-susceptible S. suis isolates with high frequency (>70%), and M341I in 339STMK motif of PBP2x, are listed. Positive associations (RR > 1) are visualized in purple blocks and negative associations (RR < 1) in yellow blocks. Color intensity of the text labels represents proportional to the risk ratio. AMC, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid; AMP, Ampicillin; CPM, Cefepime; CRO, Ceftriaxone; CTX, Cefotaxime; CXM, cefuroxime; FUR, Ceftiofur; PEN, Penicillin. ND, the risk ratio analysis could not be determined, due to none of the FUR-non-susceptible S. suis isolates without PBP substitutions.
Antibiotics 12 00158 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram presenting the major substitution sites implicated in β-lactams-non-susceptibility.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram presenting the major substitution sites implicated in β-lactams-non-susceptibility.
Antibiotics 12 00158 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lunha, K.; Chumpol, W.; Jiemsup, S.; Samngamnim, S.; Assavacheep, P.; Yongkiettrakul, S. Relationship between Penicillin-Binding Proteins Alterations and β-Lactams Non-Susceptibility of Diseased Pig-Isolated Streptococcus suis. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010158

AMA Style

Lunha K, Chumpol W, Jiemsup S, Samngamnim S, Assavacheep P, Yongkiettrakul S. Relationship between Penicillin-Binding Proteins Alterations and β-Lactams Non-Susceptibility of Diseased Pig-Isolated Streptococcus suis. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(1):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lunha, Kamonwan, Wiyada Chumpol, Surasak Jiemsup, Sukuma Samngamnim, Pornchalit Assavacheep, and Suganya Yongkiettrakul. 2023. "Relationship between Penicillin-Binding Proteins Alterations and β-Lactams Non-Susceptibility of Diseased Pig-Isolated Streptococcus suis" Antibiotics 12, no. 1: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop