Next Article in Journal
Whole-Genome Sequencing of a Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strain Isolated at a Tertiary Health Facility in Pretoria, South Africa
Next Article in Special Issue
Chlorhexidine Improves Hygiene Reducing Oral Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes with Antimicrobial Effects at Distinct Microenvironments amongst Subjects Stratified by Health Status
Previous Article in Journal
Hydroxyapatite/TiO2 Nanomaterial with Defined Microstructural and Good Antimicrobial Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Anti-Infective Periodontal Therapy on Subgingival Microbiota Evaluated by Chair-Side Test Compared to qPCR—A Clinical Follow-Up Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effectiveness of Different Chemotherapeutic Agents for Decontamination of Infected Dental Implant Surface: A Systematic Review

by
Chayya Patil
1,
Amit Agrawal
1,
Shahabe Saquib Abullais
2,*,
Suraj Arora
3,
Shafait Ullah Khateeb
3 and
Mohamed Fadul A. Elagib
2
1
Department of Periodontics, M.G.V’s K.B.H Dental College and Hospital, Nasik 422022, India
2
Department of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(5), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050593
Submission received: 12 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibacterial Treatment in Periodontal and Endodontic Therapy)

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the most effective chemotherapeutic agent for decontamination of infected dental implants. Material and methods: A systematic electronic literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google scholar between January 2010 to December 2021 was carried out by using the PRISMA guidelines. A total of five studies related to chemical decontamination of the dental implant were evaluated. The search strategy was based on the PICOS framework. Randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of different chemotherapeutic agents for the decontamination of dental implants were included in the study. The outcome variable examined was the most effective chemotherapeutic agent(s) for dental implant surface decontamination after comparing the chemotherapeutic agents used in the qualifying studies. Result: Out of the basic database of 1564 records, 1380 articles were excluded due to irrelevance, unavailability, and repetition. Furthermore, 134 articles were excluded from 184 studies for various reasons. After further filtration, 13 studies were shortlisted. Two investigators (SSA and SA) appraised the quality of the selected studies using the risk of bias assessment tool. After excluding eight studies, five articles were finally included in the present systematic review. Conclusion: The data reported for the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents in cleaning contaminated titanium surfaces are scarce, thus it is not possible to draw a definite conclusion. However, chlorhexidine (CHX) (0.2%, 0.12%), citric acid (40%) and sodium hypochlorite (1%) are the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents; amongst them, citric acid showed the highest potential for biofilm removal from the contaminated implant surface. All three agents [CHX (0.2%, 0.12%), citric acid (40%), and sodium hypochlorite (1%)] can be recommended as therapeutic agents along with their curbs.
Keywords: decontamination; peri-implantitis; peri-implantitis treatment; dental implant; biofilm removal; implant surface; chemotherapeutic agents; chemical decontamination decontamination; peri-implantitis; peri-implantitis treatment; dental implant; biofilm removal; implant surface; chemotherapeutic agents; chemical decontamination

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patil, C.; Agrawal, A.; Abullais, S.S.; Arora, S.; Khateeb, S.U.; Fadul A. Elagib, M. Effectiveness of Different Chemotherapeutic Agents for Decontamination of Infected Dental Implant Surface: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050593

AMA Style

Patil C, Agrawal A, Abullais SS, Arora S, Khateeb SU, Fadul A. Elagib M. Effectiveness of Different Chemotherapeutic Agents for Decontamination of Infected Dental Implant Surface: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(5):593. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050593

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patil, Chayya, Amit Agrawal, Shahabe Saquib Abullais, Suraj Arora, Shafait Ullah Khateeb, and Mohamed Fadul A. Elagib. 2022. "Effectiveness of Different Chemotherapeutic Agents for Decontamination of Infected Dental Implant Surface: A Systematic Review" Antibiotics 11, no. 5: 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050593

APA Style

Patil, C., Agrawal, A., Abullais, S. S., Arora, S., Khateeb, S. U., & Fadul A. Elagib, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Different Chemotherapeutic Agents for Decontamination of Infected Dental Implant Surface: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics, 11(5), 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050593

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop