Next Article in Journal
Peri-Operative Prophylaxis in Patients of Neonatal and Pediatric Age Subjected to Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of 4-[4-(Anilinomethyl)-3-phenyl-pyrazol-1-yl] Benzoic Acid Derivatives as Potent Anti-Staphylococci and Anti-Enterococci Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Human and Animal E. coli: Serotyping, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence Gene Profiling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/antibiotics11050553
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis Biofilms

by
Leandro P. Bezerra
1,
Cleverson D. T. Freitas
1,*,
Ayrles F. B. Silva
1,
Jackson L. Amaral
1,
Nilton A. S. Neto
1,
Rafael G. G. Silva
2,
Aura L. C. Parra
1,
Gustavo H. Goldman
3,
Jose T. A. Oliveira
1,
Felipe P. Mesquita
4 and
Pedro F. N. Souza
1,4,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60451, CE, Brazil
2
Department of Biology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60451, CE, Brazil
3
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo P.O. Box 05508-000, SP, Brazil
4
Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Coronel, Nunes de Melo 100, Caixa, Fortaleza 60430-275, CE, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(5), 553; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050553
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 17 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Methods in Antibiotics Discovery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
C. albicans and C. parapsilosis are biofilm-forming yeasts responsible for bloodstream infections that can cause death. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides (SAMPs) are considered to be new weapons to combat these infections, alone or combined with drugs. Here, two SAMPs, called Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII, were tested alone or combined with nystatin (NYS) and itraconazole (ITR) against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms. Furthermore, the mechanism of antibiofilm activity was evaluated by fluorescence and scanning electron microscopies. When combined with SAMPs, the results revealed a 2- to 4-fold improvement of NYS and ITR antibiofilm activity. Microscopic analyses showed cell membrane and wall damage and ROS overproduction, which caused leakage of internal content and cell death. Taken together, these results suggest the potential of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII as new drugs and adjuvants to increase the activity of conventional drugs for the treatment of clinical infections caused by C. albicans and C. parapsilosis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Biofilms are established by microbial cells on an inert or living surface, promoting the development of microcolonies with polymeric matrices and enhancing the resistance to various antimicrobial agents [1,2]. Candida species are biofilm-forming yeasts responsible for up to 15% of hospital-acquired cases of sepsis [3]. A mature biofilm produced by Candida spp. consists of an extracellular matrix composed of glycoproteins (55%), carbohydrates (25%), lipids (15%), and nucleic acids (5%) [4]. The National Institute of Health (NIH) in the USA considers biofilms to be a public health problem and estimated that they can be responsible for 80% of the difficulties in curing human infections [1,2,4,5]. The most susceptible people are immunocompromised patients, AIDS+ patients, patients under chemotherapy treatment or immunosuppressive therapies, and patients fitted with medical devices (catheters, pacemakers, and heart valves) [6,7].
C. albicans and C. parapsilosis are common opportunistic fungal pathogens that asymptomatically colonize the mucosal surfaces and skin of healthy individuals. However, in some circumstances they can cause an infection called candidiasis [8]. In addition, C. albicans and C. parapsilosis are responsible for bloodstream infections termed candidemia, which are common in immunocompromised patients, including those in intensive care units [9]. Currently, the treatment of infections caused by C. albicans and C. parapsilosis involves the use of antifungal agents that interrupt different metabolic pathways of the cell. However, some studies have reported Candida resistance to these antifungal molecules [10,11,12]. A study by Katiyar and collaborators [13] described Candida clinical isolates that contain genes responsible for resistance to some commercial antifungal agents [13]. To counter this problem, synthetic antimicrobial peptides (SAMPs) have been described as new alternatives, either alone or combined with commercial antifungal drugs, to control Candida infection and overcome the pathogens’ resistance [1]. SAMPs have some important antimicrobial characteristics found in natural antimicrobial peptides, such as positive net charge, α-helical structure, low molecular weight (600–1200 Da), high hydrophobic ratio (40–60%) and amphipathicity [1,14].
Recently, our research group designed, characterized, and evaluated the antimicrobial activity of two synthetic peptides, called Mo-CBP3-PepI (CPIAQRCC) and Mo-CBP3-PepIII (AIQRCC). These peptides were designed based on the structure of Mo-CBP3, a chitin-binding protein purified from Moringa oleifera seeds [15,16]. The anticandidal activity and mechanism of action of these peptides were evaluated by Oliveira et al. (2019) and Lima et al. (2020). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the antifungal activity and action mechanism of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII, alone or combined with NYS and ITR, against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms.

2. Results

2.1. Antibiofilm Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Two Commercial Drugs

The activities of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII (50 μg mL−1) against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms are shown in Figure 1. The biofilm formation of C. albicans was inhibited 10% by Mo-CBP3-PepI, whereas Mo-CBP3-PepIII did not show any activity. Interestingly, the commercial drugs ITR and NYS inhibited biofilm formation by only 7% and 40%, respectively (Figure 1A). Regarding the synergistic effect, the combination of both peptides Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII with ITR or NYS significantly enhanced the inhibition of C. albicans biofilm formation. For instance, the two peptides combined with NYS increased the inhibition of C. albicans biofilm formation by 40% to 80% (Figure 1A). ITR and NYS inhibited C. parapsilosis biofilm formation by 45% and 43%, respectively. In contrast, Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII inhibited this by only 15% and 25%, respectively (Figure 1B). On the other hand, combinations of Mo-CBP3-PepI + ITR, Mo-CBP3-PepIII + ITR, Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS, and Mo-CBP3-PepIII + NYS inhibited the biofilm formation by about 98%, 96%, 79%, and 82%, respectively (Figure 1B).
Regarding the degradation of mature C. albicans biofilm, ITR and NYS decreased the biofilm mass by about 50% and 30%, while Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII only degrading it by 60% and 30%, respectively (Figure 1C). Remarkably, the combinations Mo-CBP3-PepI + ITR and Mo-CBP3-PepIII + ITR did not have any effect (Figure 1C). However, the combinations Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS and Mo-CBP3-PepIII + NYS degraded 85% and 50% of the mature C. albicans biofilm (Figure 1C). Concerning the degradation of mature C. parapsilosis biofilm, only the combination Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS showed activity, reducing the biofilm biomass by 50% (Figure 1D).

2.2. Analysis of Candida Biofilm Morphology

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate damage to C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms after all treatments (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The control cells did not show any damage or alterations on the surface; only spherical-shaped cells were observed without cracks or scars. The treatment with peptides or drugs caused only mild damage, such as wrinkles and slight changes to the morphology of cells, which had a very similar appearance to the control (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In contrast, the combination of both peptides with the two drugs caused a significant reduction in the mature biofilm compared to control, and it was possible to see damage such as small blebs, new buds, scars, and rings of truncated bud scars. Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS and Mo-CBP3-PepIII + NYS were by far the most lethal to C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. In those treatments, the cells were greatly damaged, with high roughness levels, severe alterations in morphology, and a clear indication of cell lysis leading to loss of cytoplasm (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Because Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS showed the best inhibitory activity against biofilm formation, this sample was chosen to investigate alteration of mature biofilms of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis (Figure 4). The control biofilm (treated with DMSO-NaCl) did not present any damage, while the biofilms treated with NYS or Mo-CBP3-PepI presented mild damage, such as altered morphology and wrinkles, distortion, and apparent reduction in biomass compared to the controls. However, Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS was highly lethal to mature C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms (Figure 4). These biofilms had a large reduction in biomass, as well as severe cell damage, such as depression-like cavities and damage to the cell wall, alterations in cell shape, wrinkles and scars, and loss of internal content (Figure 4).

2.3. Membrane Pore Formation

The propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay was used to evaluate possible damage to the yeast cell membranes. PI interacts with DNA, releasing red fluorescence, but this is only possible when the membrane is damaged, since healthy membranes are impermeable to PI. As expected, the control (DMSO-NaCl solution) did not damage the cell membranes, because no fluorescence was detected. Similarly, cells treated with NYS and ITR did not show any fluorescence. However, Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII, alone or in combination with NYS or ITR, induced red fluorescence in C. albicans and C. parapsilosis cells, indicating these cells membranes were damaged (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9).
ROS overproduction is another mechanism employed by peptides to inhibit biofilm formation. The results showed that treatment of C. albicans cells with NYS or ITR did not induce ROS overproduction, whereas both peptides and their combination with NYS induced a slight production of ROS. None of the treatments induced ROS overproduction by C. parapsilosis biofilms (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9).

2.4. Molecular Docking

The molecular docking assays were performed to evaluate the possible interactions of the peptides with NYS and ITR. Mo-CBP3-PepI interacted with ITR and NYS with binding interaction energy (LBIE) values of −4.5 and −4.2 kcal.mol−1, respectively (Figure 10A,B). The amino acid residues Pro2 and Ile4 of the Mo-CBP3-PepI peptide showed Pi-Alkyl interactions with the phenyl (4.5 Å), piperazine (4.2 Å), and dichlorophenyl (4.5 Å) groups of ITR. Cys8 had a Pi-Anion (3.4 Å, triazole group) and a Pi-Sulfur (5.1 Å, dichlorophenyl group) interaction with ITR, and Arg6 presented only van der Waals interaction (Figure 10C). Mo-CBP3-PepI interacted with NYS by van der Waals forces between Cys8, Gln5, and Cys1. An Alkyl (5.0 Å) interaction with Pro2 and an unfavorable donor-donor (1.3 Å) with Arg6 were also observed (Figure 10D).
Mo-CBP3-PepIII presented docking scores of −4.0 and −4.1 kcal.mol−1 with ITR and NYS, respectively (Figure 10E,F). Mo-CBP3-PepIII interacted through van der Waals forces through residues Ala1, Gln3, and Cys6 with ITR. Cys5 interacted through an Amide-Pi stacked (3.8 Å) with the phenyl group of ITR. The Arg4 of Mo-CBP3-PepIII established a Pi-Cation interaction with the dichlorophenyl group (3.8 Å) and a Pi-Alkyl interaction (4.7 Å) with the methoxyphenyl group of itraconazole (Figure 10E,G). The interaction between Mo-CBP3-PepIII and NYS was supported by hydrogen bonds between residues Arg4 (2.0 Å) and Cys6 (1.9 Å), as well as through van der Waals interactions through residues Gln3 and Cys5 (Figure 10F,H).

2.5. Hemolytic Assay

As shown in a previous study [16], Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII had no hemolytic activity against any human blood type tested (Table 1), even at 50 μg mL−1. In contrast, NYS (1000 μg mL−1) caused 100% hemolysis in all human blood types, and ITR (1000 μg mL−1) caused 75%, 68%, and 58% hemolysis to Type A, B, and O red blood cells, respectively (Table 1).
In general, the combination of synthetic peptides decreased the hemolytic effect of both drugs (Table 1). The combination of Mo-CBP3-PepI with NYS resulted in hemolytic effects of 14%, 23%, and 2%, and the combination of Mo-CBP3-PepI with ITR resulted in 0%, 4%, and 8% hemolysis to Type A, B, and O red blood cells, respectively (Table 1). The combination of Mo-CBP3-PepIII with NYS hemolyzed 45%, 30%, and 18%, while the combination of Mo-CBP3-PepI with ITR resulted in 50%, 15%, and 2% for Type A, B, and O red blood cells, respectively (Table 1).

3. Discussion

Natural antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising molecules to act as substitutes or adjuvants to treat infections. However, they have some disadvantages, such as toxicity, low resistance to proteolysis, and the high cost of isolation and purification. The development of synthetic antimicrobial peptides (SAMPs) is an alternative solution to overcome these drawbacks, since they have low or no toxicity to mammalian cells, and low chance of developing antimicrobial resistance based on their mechanism of action [1,14].
Bioinspired SAMPs based on natural AMPs can have attributes that are not present in the natural molecule [17,18]. A good example is the synthetic peptide LAH4, designed based on the Magainin 2 sequence, which presented potent activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus compared with the natural peptide Magainin 2 [17,18]. Recently, our research group designed peptides derived from Mo-CBP3 and antifungal chitin-binding protein from M. oleifera seeds. Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-pepIII inhibited the growth of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis planktonic cells by the stimulation of ROS production, cell wall damage, and membrane pore formation, leading to death [15,16]. It is important to mention that Mo-CBP3 did not present anticandidal activity. Based on that, we decided to evaluate the potential of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-pepIII to inhibit biofilm formation and its capacity to promote degradation of mature biofilms of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis.
Regarding degradation of the mature biofilms of C. albicans, Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII had activity of 40% and 70%, respectively (Figure 1). These results corroborate those involving gH625, a peptide analog from gH625-M, which reduced by 61% the biomass of mature biofilms of C. albicans [19]. SEM analysis of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII showed that the biofilms suffered severe structural damage. Furthermore, SEM images suggested that the two peptides induced rupture of the cell wall and membrane pore formation, leading to internal content loss and death. The images also showed the presence of scars, buds, and cracks. These results corroborate those reported by Belmadani and collaborators [20], who observed that Dermaseptin-S1, an antimicrobial peptide from Phyllomedusa sauvagii, decreased C. albicans biofilm formation by causing changes in the cell wall structure, membrane pore formation, and leakage of internal content. Similar behavior was observed by Sierra et al., where a C. albicans biofilm suffered severe damage by the antimicrobial peptide called Histatin-5 [21]. This severe damage observed in the cell wall of both cells via SEM analysis can be explained since Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII are designed based on the sequence of Mo-CBP3, which is a chitin-binding protein from M. oleifera seeds [16]. Both peptides can interact with the chitin present in the fungal cell wall and cause destabilization of the cell, leading to rupture, electrolyte imbalance, and thus cell death.
Unlike many commercial drugs that have specific targets, SAMPs target the cell membrane and/or the cell wall [14]. The ability of SAMPs to alter the microbial membrane permeability is considered the most common mechanism of action of these molecules, making the development of resistance mechanisms by microorganisms very difficult [1,14]. Fluorescence microscopy analyses were performed to evaluate if our peptides could induce membrane damage. Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII induced PI uptake in C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms, suggesting pore formation or cell membrane damage, as observed by SEM analysis. Furthermore, the peptides induced ROS overproduction in C. parapsilosis and C. albicans biofilms. A similar profile was observed using the peptides KP and MCh-AMP1, which are synthetic peptides able to induce ROS overproduction in C. albicans biofilm, leading to cell death. ROS are involved in the damage of essential molecules such as proteins, lipids, and DNA [22].
There are some explanations for the synergistic effect of the peptides and antifungal drugs tested here. First, the interactions between both peptides and NYS and ITR (Figure 6) can explain the synergistic activity obtained, where both peptides enhanced the activity of both drugs. Additionally, molecular docking studies were performed to evaluate whether both peptides could interact with NYS and ITR. Similar behavior was detected by Souza et al. [23], where Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII interacted with griseofulvin by weak interactions, such as hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. The interaction of peptides with griseofulvin enhanced its activity against dermatophytes and reduced the toxicity of the drug, as was also shown in this study.
Two hypotheses can could explain the synergistic action between peptides and NYS. First, peptides target membranes and NYS targets the ergosterol. The interaction between peptides and NYS could result in a coordinated attack on the Candida membrane, enhancing the deleterious effect on it. Second, besides targeting the ergosterol in the membrane, NYS also has intracellular targets [24]. Once within the cytoplasm, NYS can attack the vacuole, causing its enlargement and impairing its function. Due to membrane-pore formation, the peptides might facilitate the access of NYS to the cytoplasm. It is known that Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII form pores of 6 and 20 kDa, respectively, in C. albicans and C. parapsilosis membranes [15,16]. NYS has a molecular weight of 926.1 Da, so it is feasible to suggest that NYS passes through the membrane and attacks the cellular vacuole.
The synergistic effect of peptides with ITR, which has a molecular weight of 705 Da, could be explained by its the passage through the membrane by the pores formed in it as a result of the peptides’ action. The facilitated passage of ITR through the pores formed by peptides in the membrane enhances its activity of inhibiting the cholesterol biosynthesis pathways, and thus the ergosterol synthesis [25]. One relevant fact is that both Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII improved the activity of NYS and ITR by up to 50% regarding the inhibition of biofilm formation of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Moreover, the results showed that Mo-CBP3-PepI enhanced NYS activity up to 60% in degrading the mature biofilms and preformed biofilm of both yeasts. The peptides also enhanced the antifungal activity of NYS and ITR against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms.
ITR and NYS can cause undesired effects, such as vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, abdominal pain, and dizziness. Besides these side effects, cardiotoxicity and hypertension have been attributed to ITR usage. An unexpected and interesting result was that the association of peptides with antifungal drugs reduced their toxicity to human erythrocytes. For example, NYS alone caused hemolysis of 100% in type-A erythrocytes, while Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS and Mo-CBP3-PepIII + NYS induced hemolysis of 0 and 45%, respectively, for type A blood. All treatments combining peptides with antifungal drugs were able to reduce the drugs’ hemolytic effects.
Molecular docking analysis between peptides and drugs revealed a clue about how peptides reduced these hemolytic effects. The membrane of erythrocytes has neutral phospholipids, which means that any interaction with those membranes must be driven by hydrophobic interactions [24]. It is known that NYS and ITR are hydrophobic drugs [25,26]. Thus, hydrophobic interactions with membranes of erythrocytes may drive the hemolytic activity of NYS and ITR. The molecular docking experiments revealed that peptides had hydrophobic interactions with NYS and ITR, suggesting that the hydrophobic interactions between peptides and both drugs prevented the interaction with the erythrocyte membranes, reducing their hemolytic effect.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethics Statement

Does not apply to this study.

4.2. Biological and Chemical Materials

C. albicans (ATCC 10231) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were obtained from the Laboratory of Plant Toxins of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Federal University of Ceará, Brazil. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.3. Peptide Synthesis

The synthetic peptides Mo-CBP3-PepI (CPIAQRCC) and Mo-CBP3-PepIII (AIQRCC) were chemically synthesized by the company GenOne (São Paulo, Brazil), and the quality and purity (≥95%) were analyzed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC, Jasco, Easton, MD, USA) and mass spectrometry (Waltham, MA, USA).

4.4. Biological Activity

Antibiofilm Assay

The assays against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis biofilms were performed following the method described by [27,28,29], with some modifications. To evaluate the inhibition of the biofilm formation, 100 μL of C. albicans or C. parapsilosis suspension (2.5 × 103 CFU/mL in Sabouraud liquid medium) was incubated in 96-well plates with 100 μL of Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepII or Mo-CBP3-PepIII (50 µg mL−1, as defined by [14,15,16,23]), at 37 °C for 48 h. The supernatant was removed and the wells were washed three times with sterile 0.15 M NaCl. Next, the cells were fixed with 100 μL of 100% methanol for 15 min at 37 °C and the plates were air-dried under the same conditions. Then, 200 μL of an aqueous solution of 0.1% crystal violet was added and incubated for 30 min at 24 °C. To remove the excess crystal violet, the plates were washed three times with distilled water and finally 100 μL of 33% acetic acid to solubilize the dye bound in the biofilm. After 15 min, the absorbance was measured at 600 nm using an automated microplate reader (Epoch, Biotek, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
To evaluate the degradation of mature biofilm, the cell suspensions of both yeasts (100 μL, 2.5 × 103 CFU/mL in Sabouraud liquid medium) were first incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in 96-well plates. Then, the supernatant was removed, and 100 μL of the Sabouraud liquid medium and 100 μL of each peptide (50 µg mL−1) were added and incubated again for 24 h. The culture medium was again discarded, and the same procedure that used 0.1% crystal violet was employed to quantify the biofilm mass. In both experiments, a solution of 5% DMSO in 0.9% NaCl was used as a negative control. NYS (1000 μg mL−1) and ITR (1000 μg mL−1) were used as positive controls. The synergism assays were carried out by combining the peptides (50 µg mL−1) with NYS or ITR (1000 µg mL−1) and the effectiveness was compared with the activity of the peptides and drugs alone.

4.5. Overproduction of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

The ROS overproduction was determined following the method described by Dias et al. [29], with some modifications. C. albicans and C. parapsilosis were incubated with the three peptides under the same conditions as described above. Then, 50 μL of cell suspension (2.5 × 103 CFU/mL) was incubated with 50 μL of each peptide (50 µg mL−1) for 24 h and the formed biofilm was washed with 0.15 M NaCl three times to remove the Sabouraud liquid medium. Next, 20 μL of 2′,7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) was added and incubated in the dark for 30 min at 24 °C. Finally, the biofilms were washed with 0.15 M NaCl and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus System BX 41, Tokyo, Japan) with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 525 nm.

4.6. Cell Membrane Integrity Assay

The cell membrane integrity of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis was tested as described by Dias et al. [29], with some modifications. The biofilms were treated as described for ROS overproduction analysis. Thus, 20 μL of propidium iodide (PI, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) was added and incubated in the dark for 30 min at 24 °C. Then the samples were washed three times with 0.15 M NaCl to remove the excess of PI and observed with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus System BX 41, Tokyo, Japan) with an excitation wavelength of 535 nm and emission wavelength of 617 nm.

4.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

The morphological changes in the cells of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis were evaluated by SEM (Billerica, MA, USA), using the method described by Staniszewska et al. [30]. Biofilms were fixed with 1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.15 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 for 16 h. Then the biofilms were washed with 0.15 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) three times. Next, 0.2% (v/v) osmium tetroxide was added to the samples and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and washed again under the same conditions described above. Samples were successively dehydrated with increased ethanol concentrations (30%, 50%, 70% 100% and 100% [v/v]) for 10 min each at 24 °C. Last, the final dehydration was realized with 50% hexamethyldisilane (HMDS, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) diluted in ethanol for 10 min and then 100% HDMS. The biofilms were placed on stubs and coated with a 20 nm gold layer using a positron-emission tomography (PET) coating machine (Emitech-Q150TES, Quorum Technologies, Lewes, England). The images were obtained with an FEI inspectTM50 scanning electron microscope, equipped with a low energy detector (Everhart-Thornley), and the acceleration used was 20,000 kV and 20,000× detector magnification.

4.8. Obtainment, File Preparation, and Molecular Docking

The three-dimensional (3D) structures of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII were predicted using the PepFold server 3 (https://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/services/PEP-FOLD/ accessed on 15 February 2022) [31]. The amino acid protonation of the peptides was adjusted to pH 7.4 using Protein Prepare [32]. NYS (accession number CID 16219709) and ITR (accession number CID 55283) 3D structures were obtained from the database of PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 15 February 2022) [33]. The protonation of the ligands was adjusted using the Marvin Sketch software version 15.6.15. The energy minimization of the peptide hydrogens and the ligand was conducted using Discovery Studio v. 20.1 (https://discover.3ds.com/discovery-studio-visualizer-download accessed on 15 March 2022) and Open Babel version 2.4.0 (https://osdn.net/projects/sfnet_openbabel/downloads/openbabel/2.4.0/OpenBabel-2.4.0.exe/ accessed on 5 March 2022).
Molecular docking assays were carried out using Autodock Vina, version 1.1.2 [34]. Additionally, the Autodock graphical interface version 1.5.6 was used to maintain polar hydrogens and provide charges to peptides and drugs using Kollman united charges [35]. The Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII were considered rigid molecules, and NYS and ITR were docked as flexible molecules. The grid box was defined as a 24 Å × 24 Å × 24 Å cube with the peptides in the center. The exhaustiveness was set to 16, and all other parameters were used as default. The software Discovery Studio v. 20.1 and the 3D interaction representations were realized using the Pymol program (https://pymol.org/2/ accessed on 8 March 2022).

4.9. Hemolytic Assay

The hemolytic activities of Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepIII, NYS, and ITR, alone and in their different combinations, were assessed using A, B, and O types of human erythrocytes as described by Souza et al. [14]. The concentrations of all solutions were the same as used in the synergism assays. The blood types were provided by the Hematology and Hemotherapy Center of Ceará (Fortaleza, Brazil).
The blood was collected in a tube with heparin (5 IU mL−1, Sigma Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil), centrifuged at 300× g for 5 min at 4 °C, washed with sterile 0.15 M NaCl, and diluted to a concentration of 2.5%. Each blood type was incubated (100 µL) with solutions of Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepIII (50 µg mL−1), NYS (1000 µg mL−1), or ITR (1000 µg mL−1) for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by centrifugation (300× g for 5 min at 4 °C, centrifuge Eppendorf 5810, Hannover, Germany). Supernatants were collected and transferred to 96-well microtiter plates and the hemolysis (%) was calculated by reading the absorbance at 414 nm using an automated absorbance microplate reader using DMSO-NaCl solution (0%) and 0.1% Triton X-100 (100%) as negative and positive controls for hemolysis, respectively. The hemolysis was calculated by the equation: [(Abs414nm of sample treated with peptides or drugs-Abs414nm of samples treated with DMSO-NaCl)/[(Abs414nm of samples treated with 0.1% TritonX-100-Abs414nm of samples treated with DMSO-NaCl] × 100.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All the assays were performed individually three times and the values are expressed as the mean ± standard error. The data were submitted to ANOVA followed by the Tukey test. GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (GraphPad Software company, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to generate all graphics, with a significance of p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The antibiofilm activity, absence of toxicity, and synergistic effect enhancing the activity of NYS and ITR, strongly indicated that Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII are promising antibiofilm peptides which could act as new antimicrobial agents. We also highlight their use for clinical application or adjuvants to conventional drugs to overcome resistance developed by Candida species.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions. The conception and design of the study and acquisition of data, analysis, docking analysis, and interpretation were performed by L.P.B., C.D.T.F., A.F.B.S., N.A.S.N., J.L.A., A.L.C.P., J.T.A.O. and P.F.N.S. Microscopic analyses were carried out by R.G.G.S. and A.F.B.S. Writing or revising the article was done by L.P.B., A.L.C.P., G.H.G., F.P.M. and P.F.N.S. P.F.N.S. gave final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the following Brazilian agencies: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (process numbers 308107/2013-6 and 306202/2017-4); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Instituto Nacional de Ciências e Tecnologia de Bioinspiração (Process Number: 465507/2014-0) and Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (FUNCAP). CAPES provided the postdoctoral grant to Pedro F. N. Souza (grant number 88887.318820/2019-00). We are also grateful to the staff of the central analytical facilities of UFC, Brazil.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to CAPES for providing the postdoctoral grant to Pedro F. N. Souza. We are also grateful to the staff of the central analytical facilities of UFC, Brazil.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing of the paper.

References

  1. Lima, P.G.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Amaral, J.L.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Souza, P.F.N. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides: Characteristics, design, and potential as alternative molecules to overcome microbial resistance. Life Sci. 2021, 278, 119647–119660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kumar, A.; Alam, A.; Rani, M.; Ehtesham, N.Z.; Hasnain, S.E. Biofilms: Survival and defense strategy for pathogens. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 307, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kovács, R.; Majoros, L. Fungal quorum-sensing molecules: A review of their antifungal effect against Candida biofilms. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zarnowski, R.; Westler, W.M.; Lacmbouh, G.A.; Marita, J.M.; Bothe, J.R.; Bernhardt, J.; Lounes-Hadj Sahraoui, A.; Fontaine, J.; Sanchez, H.; Hatfield, R.D.; et al. Novel entries in a fungal biofilm matrix encyclopedia. MBio 2014, 5, e01333-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fox, E.P.; Nobile, C.J. A sticky situation. Transcription 2012, 3, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kullberg, B.J.; Oude Lashof, A.M.L. Epidemiology of opportunistic invasive mycoses. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2002, 7, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Weig, M. Clinical aspects and pathogenesis of Candida Infection. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6, 468–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baillie, G.S. Matrix polymers of Candida biofilms and their possible role in biofilm resistance to antifungal agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 46, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sasso, M.; Roger, C.; Sasso, M.; Poujol, H.; Barbar, S.; Lefrant, J.-Y.; Lachaud, L. Changes in the distribution of colonising and infecting Candida Spp. isolates, antifungal drug consumption and susceptibility in a french intensive care unit: A 10-year study. Mycoses 2017, 60, 770–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. LaFleur, M.D.; Kumamoto, C.A.; Lewis, K. Candida albicans biofilms produce antifungal-tolerant persister cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3839–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ramage, G. Investigation of multidrug efflux pumps in relation to fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Arendrup, M.C.; Patterson, T.F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: Epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S445–S451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Katiyar, S.; Pfaller, M.; Edlind, T. Candida albicans and Candida glabrata clinical isolates exhibiting reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2892–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Souza, P.F.N.; Marques, L.S.M.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Lima, P.G.; Dias, L.P.; Neto, N.A.S.; Lopes, F.E.S.; Sousa, J.S.; Silva, A.F.B.; Caneiro, R.F.; et al. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides: From choice of the best sequences to action mechanisms. Biochimie 2020, 175, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lima, P.G.; Souza, P.F.N.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Dias, L.P.; Neto, J.X.S.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Lopes, J.L.S.; Sousa, D.O.B. Anticandidal activity of synthetic peptides: Mechanism of action revealed by scanning electron and fluorescence microscopies and synergism effect with nystatin. J. Pept. Sci. 2020, 26, e3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oliveira, J.T.A.; Souza, P.F.N.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Dias, L.P.; Martins, T.F.; Van Tilburg, M.F.; Guedes, M.I.F.; Sousa, D.O.B. Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepII, and Mo-CBP3-PepIII are synthetic antimicrobial peptides active against human pathogens by stimulating ROS generation and increasing plasma membrane permeability. Biochimie 2019, 157, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mason, A.J.; Moussaoui, W.; Abdelrahman, T.; Boukhari, A.; Bertani, P.; Marquette, A.; Shooshtarizaheh, P.; Moulay, G.; Boehm, N.; Guerold, B. Structural determinants of antimicrobial and antiplasmodial activity and selectivity in histidine-rich amphipathic cationic peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mason, A.J.; Gasnier, C.; Kichler, A.; Prévost, G.; Aunis, D.; Metz-Boutigue, M.H.; Bechinger, B. Enhanced membrane disruption and antibiotic action against pathogenic bacteria by designed histidine-rich peptides at acidic PH. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3305–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Galdiero, E.; de Alteriis, E.; De Natale, A.; D’Alterio, A.; Siciliano, A.; Guida, M.; Lombardi, L.; Falanga, A.; Galdiero, S. Eradication of Candida albicans persister cell biofilm by the membranotropic peptide GH625. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5780–5791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Belmadani, A.; Semlali, A.; Rouabhia, M. Dermaseptin-S1 decreases Candida albicans growth, biofilm formation and the expression of hyphal wall protein 1 and aspartic protease genes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sierra, J.M.; Fusté, E.; Rabanal, F.; Vinuesa, T.; Viñas, M. An overview of antimicrobial peptides and the latest advances in their development. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2017, 17, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Seyedjavadi, S.S.; Khani, S.; Eslamifar, A.; Ajdary, S.; Goudarzi, M.; Halabian, R.; Akbari, R.; Zare-Zardini, H.; Imani Fooladi, A.A.; Amani, J.; et al. The antifungal peptide MCh-AMP1 derived from Matricaria chamomilla inhibits Candida albicans growth via inducing ROS generation and altering fungal cell membrane permeability. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Souza, P.F.N.; Lima, P.G.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Sousa, D.O.B.; Neto, N.A.S.; Dias, L.P.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Freitas, L.B.N.; Silva, R.G.G.; Sousa, J.S.; et al. Antidermatophytic activity of synthetic peptides: Action mechanisms and clinical application as adjuvants to enhance the activity and decrease the toxicity of griseofulvin. Mycoses 2020, 63, 979–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bhuiyan, M.S.A.; Ito, Y.; Nakamura, A.; Tanaka, N.; Fujita, K.; Fukui, H.; Takegawa, K. Nystatin effects on vacuolar function in Saccharomyce. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Borgers, M.; Van de Ven, M.-A. Mode of action of itraconazole: Morphological aspects. Mycoses 1989, 32 (Suppl. 1), 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, Y.; Huang, J.; Chen, Y. Alpha-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides: Relationships of structure and function. Protein Cell 2010, 1, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Benavent, C.; García-Herrero, V.; Torrado, C.; Torrado-Santiago, S. Nystatin antifungal micellar systems on endotracheal tubes: Development, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Pharmazie 2019, 74, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lang, B.; Liu, S.; McGinity, J.W.; Williams, R.O. Effect of hydrophilic additives on the dissolution and pharmacokinetic properties of itraconazole-enteric polymer hot-melt extruded amorphous solid dispersions. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2016, 42, 429–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dias, L.P.; Souza, P.F.N.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Araújo, N.M.S.; Tilburg, M.F.V.; Guedes, M.I.F.; Carneiro, R.F.; Lopes, J.L.S.; Sousa, D.O.B. RcAlb-PepII, a synthetic small peptide bioinspired in the 2S albumin from the seed cake of Ricinus communis, is a potent antimicrobial agent against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Candida parapsilosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2020, 1862, 183092–183102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Staniszewska, M.; Bondaryk, M.; Swoboda-Kopec, E.; Siennicka, K.; Sygitowicz, G.; Kurzatkowski, W. Candida albicans morphologies revealed by scanning electron microscopy analysis. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lamiable, A.; Thévenet, P.; Rey, J.; Vavrusa, M.; Derreumaux, P.; Tufféry, P. PEP-FOLD3: Faster de novo structure prediction for linear peptides in solution and in complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W449–W454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Martínez-Rosell, G.; Giorgino, T.; De Fabritiis, G. PlayMolecule ProteinPrepare: A web application for protein preparation for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017, 57, 1511–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, S.; Chen, J.; Cheng, T.; Gindulyte, A.; He, J.; He, S.; Li, Q.; Shoemaker, B.A.; Thiessen, P.A.; Yu, B.; et al. PubChem 2019 update: Improved access to chemical data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D1102–D1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Morris, G.M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M.F.; Belew, R.K.; Goodsell, D.S.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock4 and autodocktools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 11 00553 g001 550
Figure 1. (A,B) Inhibitory activity of biofilm formation and (C,D) degradation of mature biofilm of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. DMSO-NaCl was used as a negative control and ITR and NYS as positive controls. The letters represent the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate a statistically significant difference compared to DMSO-NaCl by analysis of variance (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. (A,B) Inhibitory activity of biofilm formation and (C,D) degradation of mature biofilm of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. DMSO-NaCl was used as a negative control and ITR and NYS as positive controls. The letters represent the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate a statistically significant difference compared to DMSO-NaCl by analysis of variance (p < 0.05).
Antibiotics 11 00553 g001
Antibiotics 11 00553 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images showing C. albicans biofilms after treatment with ITR, NYS, Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepIII, and their combinations. Control: DMSO-NaCl solution.
Figure 2. SEM images showing C. albicans biofilms after treatment with ITR, NYS, Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepIII, and their combinations. Control: DMSO-NaCl solution.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g002
Antibiotics 11 00553 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images showing C. parapsilosis biofilms after treatment with ITR, NYS, Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepIII, and their combinations. Control: DMSO-NaCl solution.
Figure 3. SEM images showing C. parapsilosis biofilms after treatment with ITR, NYS, Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepIII, and their combinations. Control: DMSO-NaCl solution.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g003
Antibiotics 11 00553 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images showing alterations of mature biofilm of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis after treatment with Mo-CBP3-PepI, NYS and Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS. Control: DMSO-NaCl solution.
Figure 4. SEM images showing alterations of mature biofilm of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis after treatment with Mo-CBP3-PepI, NYS and Mo-CBP3-PepI + NYS. Control: DMSO-NaCl solution.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g004
Antibiotics 11 00553 g005 550
Figure 5. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on inhibition of biofilm of C. albicans cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity of both peptides with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Figure 5. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on inhibition of biofilm of C. albicans cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity of both peptides with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g005
Antibiotics 11 00553 g006 550
Figure 6. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on inhibition of the biofilm of C. parapsilosis cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity of both peptides with ITR. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Figure 6. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on inhibition of the biofilm of C. parapsilosis cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity of both peptides with ITR. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g006
Antibiotics 11 00553 g007 550
Figure 7. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on inhibition of the biofilm of C. parapsilosis cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity of both peptides with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Figure 7. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on inhibition of the biofilm of C. parapsilosis cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity of both peptides with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g007
Antibiotics 11 00553 g008 550
Figure 8. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on degradation of the biofilm of C. albicans cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Figure 8. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on degradation of the biofilm of C. albicans cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g008
Antibiotics 11 00553 g009 550
Figure 9. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on degradation of the biofilm of C. parapsilosis cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Figure 9. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and ROS overproduction on degradation of the biofilm of C. parapsilosis cells. Control solution of DMSO-NaCl, treated with Mo-CBP3-PepI at 50 μg mL−1 and synergistic activity with NYS. Membrane pore formation was measured by the PI uptake assay, and ROS overproduction was detected using 2′, 7′ dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Bars: 100 µm.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g009
Antibiotics 11 00553 g010 550
Figure 10. Molecular docking revealed that Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII interact with ITR and NYS. Mo-CBP3-PepI is represented in pink (A,B) and Mo-CBP3-PepIII in blue (E,F). (C,D,G,H) show the binding sites of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII with ITR and NYS.
Figure 10. Molecular docking revealed that Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII interact with ITR and NYS. Mo-CBP3-PepI is represented in pink (A,B) and Mo-CBP3-PepIII in blue (E,F). (C,D,G,H) show the binding sites of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII with ITR and NYS.
Antibiotics 11 00553 g010
Table
Table 1. Hemolytic activity of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII, antifungal drugs, and combined solutions on human red blood cells.
Table 1. Hemolytic activity of Mo-CBP3-PepI and Mo-CBP3-PepIII, antifungal drugs, and combined solutions on human red blood cells.
Peptides/Combinations% Hemolysis
Type A BloodType B BloodType O Blood
0.1% Triton X-100100 ± 0.002100 ± 0.001100 ± 0.007
DMSO-NaCl Solution000
NYS (1000 µg mL−1)100 ± 0.005100 ± 0.001100 ± 0.002
ITR (1000 µg mL−1)75 ± 0.00768 ± 0.00458 ± 0.003
Mo-CBP3-PepI (50 µg mL−1)000
Mo-CBP3-PepIII (50 µg mL−1)000
Mo-CBP3-PepI (50 µg mL−1) + NYS (1000 µg mL−1)14 ± 0.00623 ± 0.0092 ± 0.001
Mo-CBP3-PepI (50 µg mL−1) + ITR (1000 µg mL−1)04 ± 0.0038 ± 0.005
Mo-CBP3-PepIII (50 µg mL−1) + NYS (1000 µg mL−1)45 ± 0.00130 ± 0.00118 ± 0.007
Mo-CBP3-PepIII (50 µg mL−1) + ITR (1000 µg mL−1)50 ± 0.00515 ± 0.0082 ± 0.001
The mean ± standard deviation of three replicates according to ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bezerra, L.P.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Silva, A.F.B.; Amaral, J.L.; Neto, N.A.S.; Silva, R.G.G.; Parra, A.L.C.; Goldman, G.H.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Mesquita, F.P.; et al. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis Biofilms. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050553

AMA Style

Bezerra LP, Freitas CDT, Silva AFB, Amaral JL, Neto NAS, Silva RGG, Parra ALC, Goldman GH, Oliveira JTA, Mesquita FP, et al. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis Biofilms. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(5):553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bezerra, Leandro P., Cleverson D. T. Freitas, Ayrles F. B. Silva, Jackson L. Amaral, Nilton A. S. Neto, Rafael G. G. Silva, Aura L. C. Parra, Gustavo H. Goldman, Jose T. A. Oliveira, Felipe P. Mesquita, and et al. 2022. "Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis Biofilms" Antibiotics 11, no. 5: 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050553

APA Style

Bezerra, L. P., Freitas, C. D. T., Silva, A. F. B., Amaral, J. L., Neto, N. A. S., Silva, R. G. G., Parra, A. L. C., Goldman, G. H., Oliveira, J. T. A., Mesquita, F. P., & Souza, P. F. N. (2022). Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis Biofilms. Antibiotics, 11(5), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop