Next Article in Journal
Comparative Effectiveness of Ampicillin/Sulbactam versus Cefazolin as Targeted Therapy for Bacteremia Caused by Beta-Lactamase-Producing Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of 4,4′-Dihydroxy-azobenzene against Clinically Resistant Staphylococci
Previous Article in Journal
MRSA and Skin Infections in Psoriatic Patients: Therapeutic Options and New Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics11111506
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli from Dogs and Cats in Northeastern China from 2012 to 2021

by
Yifan Zhou
1,2,†,
Xue Ji
2,3,†,
Bing Liang
2,3,
Bowen Jiang
2,3,
Yan Li
1,2,
Tingyv Yuan
2,
Lingwei Zhu
2,3,
Jun Liu
2,3,
Xuejun Guo
2,3 and
Yang Sun
2,3,*
1
Engineering Research Center of Glycoconjugates, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
2
Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130021, China
3
Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun 130021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(11), 1506; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111506
Submission received: 2 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 28 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance and Antimicrobial Use in Companion Animals II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: there has been a growing concern about pet-spread bacterial zoonosis in recent years. This study aimed to investigate the trend in drug-resistance of canine Escherichia coli isolates in northeast China between 2012–2021 and the differences in drug-resistance of E. coli of different origins in 2021. (2) Methods: E. coli were isolated from feces or anal swab samples from dogs and cats, and their antibiotic susceptibility profiles and phylogenetic grouping were identified. PCR was applied on the extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) E. coli for antibiotic resistance genes. (3) Results: five hundred and fifty-four E. coli isolates were detected in 869 samples (63.75%). The multidrug resistance (MDR) rates of E. coli in pet dogs showed a decreasing trend, but working dogs showed the opposite trend. Resistance genes blaCTX-M and blaCTX-M+TEM were dominant among the ESBL producers (n = 219). The consistency between the resistance phenotypes and genes was high except for fluoroquinolone-resistant ESBL E. coli. All ESBL E. coli-carrying blaNDM were isolated from working dogs, and one of the strains carried mcr-1 and blaNDM-4. Phylogroup B2 was the dominant group in pet cats, and more than half of the isolates from companion cats were ESBL E. coli. (4) Conclusions: the measures taken to reduce resistance in China were beginning to bear fruit. Companion cats may be more susceptible to colonization by ESBL E. coli. The problem of resistant bacteria in working dogs and pet cats warrants concern.

1. Introduction

As the first choice for the treatment of bacterial infection, antibiotics play an important role in the clinical treatment of humans and animals [1] and can also promote the growth of livestock and poultry. Before China’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development issued a ban on the addition of antibiotics to feed, nearly half of the antibiotics used every year were mixed in animal feed to improve the growth of livestock and poultry. Antimicrobial resistance has become one of the most challenging problems in public health due to the overuse of antibiotics [2].
Most Escherichia coli are considered important components of the intestinal flora, but some E. coli carrying virulence genes can act as conditional pathogens to cause intestinal or extraintestinal infections, such as diarrhea, urinary tract infections, sepsis and meningitis, and a proportion of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli can inhabit the intestine as normal flora and cause extraintestinal infections [3,4]. E. coli is one of the most widespread organisms in the intestinal flora and is chronically exposed to antibiotic selection pressure; therefore, testing E. coli isolated from fecal samples for drug resistance is a good indicator of the level of resistance in the intestinal flora [5].
Escherichia coli is sensitive to antibiotic pressure and has a very high potential for the development of drug resistance, leading to an increasing number of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and even pandrug-resistant strains. MDR is defined as non-susceptible to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [6]. MDR pathogens can cause more severe, longer-lasting infections and ultimately have global pandemic potential [7]. E. coli resistance to β-lactams is usually associated with plasmid-mediated extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) [8]. As a horizontal transmission vector of drug resistance genes, plasmids can be transmitted between different species of bacteria with blaESBL. More and more blaESBL genes have been reported in bacteria, including commensal bacteria that cause canine diseases.
Current research related to antibiotic resistance is mainly focused on food-origin animals, such as livestock and poultry. However, because of close contact between companion animals and human beings, E. coli isolated from companion dogs and cats is highly similar to human isolates, increasing the possibility of passing resistant E. coli between species and bringing a potential threat to human health [9]. Working dogs around the world play an irreplaceable role in many tasks, including product detection, protection, search and rescue, owing to their keen sense of smell and long-lasting physical abilities [10]. However, few studies of the prevalence of drug resistance have focused on working dogs in China.
This study explored the impact of changes in antibiotic use trends in recent years on E. coli drug resistance phenotypes by investigating the drug resistance of E. coli in dogs in northeast China from 2012 to 2021, and also investigated the prevalence of drug resistance phenotypes and drug resistance genes of ESBL E. coli in dogs and cats, as well as enriching the drug resistance data related to E. coli in working dogs.

2. Results

2.1. E. coli Isolation

The isolates of E. coli were identified in 63.75% (554/869) of samples; the isolation rates of E. coli from pet dogs, working dogs and pet cats were 53.68% (292/544), 92.72% (191/206), and 59.66% (71/119), respectively. E. coli was more prevalent in animals with diarrhea than in healthy animals in 2021 [70% (28/40), 54.44% (49/90), respectively].

2.2. Drug Resistance Phenotypes

In total, 86.46% of E. coli isolates exhibited resistance to at least one antibiotic. E. coli exhibited diverse antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, with 230 different resistance patterns detected (Table S1). The MDR rates of E. coli isolates from pet dogs decreased from 76.92% from 2012–2013 to 62.42% in 2021 (p < 0.05), but working dogs showed the opposite trend (an increase from 41.18 to 72.86%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportions of MDR E. coli between healthy companion animals and those with diarrhea [59.18% (29/49) vs. 60.71% (17/28), respectively, p > 0.05]. In pet dogs, the proportion of E. coli with multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index ≥ 0.2 gradually declined between 2012–2021, but working dogs showed the opposite trend. E. coli in pet cats showed more serious drug resistance than that in pet dogs in 2021 (Figure 1).
The resistance rates to different antibiotics and drug resistance patterns of isolates from different sources between 2012–2021 are shown in Tables S2 and S3 and Figure S1. There was a general trend of decreasing resistance to various antibiotics in pet dog E. coli isolates between 2012–2021, while the opposite was true for working dog E. coli (Figure 2). Working dog isolates in 2021 showed higher resistance to β-lactamase inhibitors and aminoglycosides than isolates from pet dogs. Notably, almost all isolates in this study were sensitive to colistin and carbapenems, and only 1.99% (n = 11) were resistant to colistin and 1.99% (n = 11) to carbapenem antibiotics. No carbapenem resistance phenotype was found in isolates from pet cats.

2.3. ESBL-Producing E. coli

A total of 219 E. coli isolated in this study were ESBL producers, although no ESBL producer was isolated from working dogs between 2012–2013. More than half of the feline E. coli (60.56%) were ESBL producers. Healthy and diarrheic companion animals had a similar prevalence of ESBL producers [40.82% (20/49) vs. 39.29% (11/28), respectively, p > 0.05].
All ESBL-producing E. coli showed resistance to cefazolin, ampicillin, and piperacillin. The resistance rates of ESBL producers to fluoroquinolone antibiotics continued to decline from 2012 to 2021 (Table S4). It is noteworthy that 2.74% (n = 6) of ESBL-E. coli in 2021 were resistant to 11–12 antimicrobial categories (Table S5).

2.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

All isolates with ESBL markers carried blaESBL genes, and no blaSHV was detected. Our ESBL E. coli carried one or more blaESBL genes from the three enzyme families: CTX-M, TEM, and OXA-1 (Table 1), and blaCTX-M and blaCTX-M+TEM were dominant among the ESBL producers. blaCTX-M was dominant between 2012–2015, but blaCTX-M+TEM was dominant in 2021. ESBL E. coli carrying blaCTX-M+TEM+OXA-1 were detected between 2012–2021.
Comparisons with blaCTX-M-negative MDR E. coli and blaCTX-M-positive MDR E. coli showed significantly increased resistance to gentamicin, cephalosporins (except ceftazidime), monobactams, penicillins, amoxicillin–clavulanate, sulfonamides, and fluoroquinolones (p < 0.05, Table 2).
This study explored the consistency between the resistance phenotypes and resistance genes of ESBL E. coli for various antibiotics (Table S6). In total, 91.18% of AG-type (resistant to amikacin and gentamicin) ESBL E. coli carried rmtB, and the rest carried armA; 99.45% (180/181) of tetracycline resistant strains carried tet (A)/tet (B)/tet (C); tet (A) was detected in 85.08% (154/181) of tetracycline-resistant strains, tet (B) was detected in 21.55% (39/181) of tetracycline-resistant strains, and tet (M) was detected in 3.31% (6/181) of tetracycline-resistant strains. In addition, 8.44% (13/154) of tetracycline-resistant strains concomitantly carried tet (A) and tet (B), and 3.90% (6/154) of tetracycline-resistant strains concomitantly carried tet (A) and tet (M). The tet (X1–X5) genes were not detected in any ESBL E. coli. A total of 97.90% (140/143) of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole-resistant strains carried sulR genes. The sul2 gene had the highest positivity rate, up to 79.02% (113/143), followed by sul1 [48.95% (70/143)] and sul3 [19.58% (28/143)], while 2.80% (4/143) concomitantly carried three sulR genes, 37.76% (54/143) concomitantly carried sul1 and sul2, and 11.89% (17/143) concomitantly carried sul2 and sul3. Some ESBL E. coli carrying sulR genes were sensitive to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Resistance genes cmlA or floR were detected in 90.68% of chloramphenicol-resistant strains, and up to 52.63% of intermediately-sensitive strains also carried cmlA. The carriage rate of qnrS in fluoroquinolone sensitive or intermediately sensitive ESBL E. coli (47.19%) was higher than that in resistant strains (16.15%), while aac (6′)-Ib-cr showed the opposite trend.
All colistin-resistant ESBL producers carried mcr-1, and 75% (3/4) of carbapenem resistant ESBL producers carried blaNDM, while the other strain was only resistant to imipenem. PD13dc carried both blaNDM-4 and mcr-1, PD82dc and PD136dc carried blaNDM-5, and all strains carrying blaNDM were isolated from working dogs (Figure 3).

2.5. Phylogenetic Groups

The analysis of phylogroups showed that phylogroups A (37.77%) and B1 (30.16%) were the dominant groups among E. coli isolates in 2021, followed by phylogroups B2 (16.03%), F (6.79%), E (4.89%), C (2.99%), D (1.09%) and E clades (0.27%), respectively (Table S7). The isolates from different origins exhibited different structural characteristics. Phylogroups A and B1 were the dominant groups of canine E. coli; however, phylogroup B2 was the dominant group in E. coli from companion cats, and no isolates were assigned to phylogroup D. Phylogroups A and B1 were the dominant phylogroups of canine ESBL E. coli, except for those isolated in 2015, and phylogroups B1 and B2 were dominant phylogroups in feline ESBL E. coli (Table S8).

3. Discussion

Drug-resistant bacteria can be transmitted through close contact between pets and humans (such as petting, licking, or physical injuries) or through the home environment (such as contamination of food and furniture), posing a risk to children, the elderly, and pregnant or immunocompromised individuals [11]. Some high-income countries have investigated the antimicrobial resistance of E. coli carried by companion animals, such as the United Kingdom [12], the United States [13], Spain [14], Canada [15], Australia [16], Japan [17], and Thailand [18]. The prevalence of drug-resistant E. coli (86.64%) in this study was much higher than in most developed and even developing countries. Previous studies have shown that the occurrence of MDR E. coli in companion animals varies considerably between provinces in China, from 24 to 86% [19,20,21,22,23]. E. coli exhibited a variety of antimicrobial resistance patterns in our study.
Since China began to include antibiotics in the management of veterinary prescription drugs in 2013, relevant authorities have released a number of policies to curb the increase in antimicrobial resistance in animal-derived bacteria. In 2015, China issued a decision on the discontinuation of the use of four veterinary drugs (namely, lomefloxacin, pefloxacin, ofloxacin, and norfloxacin) in food animals [24]; in 2016, China banned the use of colistin sulfate to promote animals’ growth and, in 2018, China advocated avoiding the use of 3rd/4th generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolone antibiotics in veterinary antimicrobial selection. In 2019, China began a complete ban on the addition of growth-promoting additives in feed. In our study, the resistance of E. coli in pet dogs to fluoroquinolones and 3rd/4th generation cephalosporins continued to decline from 2012 to 2021, the resistance to colistin decreased between 2015–2021, and the resistance of E. coli to various types of antibiotics in pet dogs was largely on a downward trend between 2015–2021. Although China does not allow carbapenems to be used in animals [25], a few E. coli with resistance to these antibiotics and related resistance genes were still detected in this experiment, which may have been caused by the transmission of drug resistance genes from humans to pets. Additionally, there have been occasional reports of companion animals carrying relevant resistance genes in recent years in China and elsewhere [25,26], so the government still needs to control these types of antibiotics strictly, because the spread of resistance to these antibiotics will cause a global health crisis [27].
It is reported that bacterial resistance is positively correlated with antibiotic use [11]. Antimicrobial resistance was generally consistent between our isolates and clinical isolates from the Chinese antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET; https://www.chinets.com/, accessed on 21 April 2022). The possible causes are as follows: (1) The inability of companion animals to communicate the specificity and severity of their symptomatology may prompt pet owners to take precautionary and preventative measures to protect their pets, such as the use of antibiotics [28]; (2) Resistance genes may spread within the household; (3) The development of veterinary drugs is limited, and it is difficult to meet the needs of various pet diseases, so some human clinical antibiotics are used in animals; (4) Both self-medication with antibiotics and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing are prevalent in China. Self-administered antibiotics are mainly from over-the-counter purchases and leftover antibiotics from previous prescriptions [29].
As an important component of AMR E. coli, the prevalence of ESBL E. coli in companion animals varies among continents, ranging from 0.63% (Oceania) to 16.56% (Africa) in companion dogs and from 0% (Oceania) to 16.56% (Asia) in cats [30]. In this study, 41.30% (171/414) of E. coli isolated from companion animals were ESBL E. coli, which was significantly higher than the global prevalence of ESBL E. coli [30]. The rational use of antibiotics to reduce resistance remains a huge challenge in China. It has been reported that the prevalence of ESBL producers is higher in diarrheic animals than in healthy animals [31,32]. However, the prevalence of ESBL producers in healthy and diarrheic companion animals showed no significant difference in this study (p > 0.05), but the frequent and uncontrolled defecation of diarrheic pets increases the likelihood of spread of the ESBL-producing E. coli to the owner [33].
In 2021, ESBL E. coli was isolated from working dogs for the first time (34.29%). Resistance rates to most antibiotics were much lower in working dogs than in companion dogs between 2012–2013, a phenomenon that began to change in 2021. The possible reasons are as follows: (1) The use of antibiotics. Some antibiotics have been widely used in working dogs after 2020, such as penicillin and gentamicin; (2) Working dogs may acquire more drug-resistance genes from the environment during training, such as when picking up target objects from the ground. Notably, for the first time, an E. coli resistant to all 13 categories of antibiotics tested (except aztreonam) was isolated from working dog samples, and it carried both mcr-1 and blaNDM-4. E. coli carrying both genes has been previously isolated only from broiler feces in China [34] and from human patients in north Lebanon [35]. Study has shown that the fitness cost of blaNDM-4 carriage is not lower and that its presence might indicate rare occurrence and transmission among strains of different origins [34], but relevant genes were still detected in working dogs. The other two strains of E. coli carrying blaNDM-5 were also isolated from working dogs, and the fitness cost of blaNDM-5 is low [34], which undoubtedly increases the difficulty of prevention and treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections and poses a potential threat to working dogs and related practitioners. It is necessary to take action to solve the problem of the spread of drug-resistant E. coli in working dogs.
Many researchers have reported that ESBL E. coli had a higher prevalence in dogs than in cats [36,37], but the trend in this study was the opposite. This phenomenon may be caused by the following: (1) A higher usage rate of the 3rd generation cephalosporins in cats than in dogs, because cats have poor adherence to oral medication and are less likely to ingest medication in food [38]; (2) The transmission frequency of drug resistance genes between cats and owners is higher than for dogs; a study in Mexico showed that participants spent more time stroking, brushing, and hugging their cats than their dogs [39]. According to the survey data of the white paper on China’s pet industry in 2021, the number of cats surpassed that of dogs in 2021, becoming the most preferred pet; therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring of drug resistance in the intestinal flora of cats.
Most of the early ESBLs described were of the TEM or SHV type, but the CTX-M type gradually became the most prevalent ESBL type throughout the world after the emergence of the CTX-M type [40], and blaCTX-M was the dominant bla gene in this study. ESBL E. coli resistant to amikacin in this study were resistant to gentamicin, so amikacin can be used as an indicator of aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance. Compared with aac (6′)-Ib, aac (3)-II had a higher detection rate in gentamicin-resistant strains, which is consistent with the prevalence of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in Chinese human clinical E. coli isolates [41]. The resistance of ESBL E. coli from dogs and cats to amikacin in this study is mainly caused by rmtB, which is consistent with the prevalence of 16S rRNA methylases in Asia [42]. In this study, armA were isolated from ESBL E. coli in pet cats for the first time in China, and there is only one report of E. coli carrying armA isolated from companion dogs in the world [43]. Some strains carrying sulR genes are sensitive to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, which may be related to dfr, which endows bacteria with trimethoprim resistance [44]. The sul2 genes are on large multi-resistance plasmids, indicating that it is unrealistic to eliminate the resistance genes widely distributed on mobile-genetic elements by reducing the use of antibiotics in the medium and short term [45]. The detection rates of PMQR (plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance) genes (qnr, aac (6′)-Ib-cr) in fluoroquinolone resistant strains were low. It is reported that high fluoroquinolone resistance is mainly obtained through the accumulation of PMQR genes and quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDR) mutations [46]. PMQR genes do not confer a high level of resistance to fluoroquinolones but, rather, confer reduced susceptibility to these antimicrobial agents [44], so the prevalence of qnrS in sensitive and intermediate strains is much higher than that in resistant isolates. The high detection rates of tet (A) and tet (B) indicate that the main mechanism of tetracycline resistance in E. coli in dogs and cats in northeast China is active efflux, which is in line with the epidemic trend of tetracycline resistance genes in E. coli of animal origin. Resistance genes cmlA and floR are often found on plasmids and can be transferred horizontally between different species of bacteria. The high detection rate of cmlA in the chloramphenicol strains of intermediate sensitivity may be caused by the non-expression or low-level expression of the cmlA gene in vivo [47]. Most of the drug-resistant genes detected in this study exist in plasmids. The resistance rates to sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones and gentamicin were significantly higher in blaCTX-M positive strains than in blaCTX-M negative strains because these drug-resistant genes are on the same plasmid or can be co-transferred with blaCTX-M [22,48,49]. Once these genes are co-transferred with blaCTX-M, they will pose a huge risk to human health.
All phylogroups were found among ESBL producers in this study, which was only previously reported in the United States and Europe [30]. It has been reported that phylogenetic group B2 was more common in diarrheic animals than in healthy animals [50], but there was no significant difference in phylogroup between diarrheic and healthy companion animals in this study (p > 0.05). A large number of canine E. coli isolated in 2021 belonged to phylogroups A and B1, which was consistent with the prevalence trend of E. coli phylogroups in domestic animals [51]. However, a predominance of phylogroup B2 (42.25%), followed by phylogroup B1 (35.21%) was observed in pet cats, consistent with the dominant phylogroup of E. coli isolated from the urine of cats in the United States [13]. B2 and D are the most common phylogenetic groups of urinary tract infection isolates in dogs and cats, and phylogroup B2 is highly associated with urinary tract infections in humans [52], so isolates in cats are even more worrying. Integrons were less frequent in B2 than non-B2 isolates [53], and there were more feline ESBL E. coli belonging to phylogroup B1 than phylogroup B2, suggesting a trade-off between resistance and virulence [49].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection

With the approval of the Laboratory Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, professionals collected 869 feces or anal swabs, placed them in a refrigerated box, and sent them with ice packs to the laboratory for testing within 24 h. The animals sampled included pet dogs (n = 544, collected from Animal Hospitals in Changchun, Jilin Province), pet cats (n = 119, collected from animal hospitals in Changchun, Jilin Province), and working dogs (n = 206, collected from Harbin, Heilongjiang Province). In this study, samples were collected three times. Samples from working dogs and pet dogs were collected between 2012–2013, samples from pet dogs were collected in 2015, and samples from working dogs, pet dogs, and cats were collected in 2021.

4.2. Isolation and Identification of E. coli

Each sample was placed in a 4 mL centrifuge tube, to which 2 mL physiological saline was added. After vortexing and mixing, 20 μL fecal suspension were placed on MacConkey agar plates (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) and cultured at 37 °C for 16–18 h. A red single colony was selected and purified until no miscellaneous bacteria were found. Specific E. coli 16S rDNA primers [54] were used to identify the isolates. The biochemical indices of the PCR positive strains were further determined using the BD Phoenix-100™ automatic microbiological identification/drug susceptibility system (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New York, NJ, USA). The E. coli strains were stored at −80 °C for further analysis (one strain per sample).

4.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Initial ESBL Identification

The BD Phoenix-100™ automatic microbiological identification/drug susceptibility system was used to identify resistance phenotypes of E. coli isolated between 2015–2021, including aminoglycosides (amikacin and gentamicin), carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporins (cefazolin), 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and cefepime), monobactams (aztreonam), penicillins (ampicillin and piperacillin), penicillins + β-lactamase inhibitors (amoxicillin–clavulanate and ampicillin–sulbactam), antipseudomonal penicillins + β-lactamase inhibitors (piperacillin–tazobactam), polymyxins (colistin), sulfonamides (trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole), phenicols (chloramphenicol), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin), and tetracyclines (tetracycline). In addition, for potential ESBL and carbapenemase-producing strains, the corresponding ESBL/ALERT1 resistance markers were shown in the report.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli isolated in 2013 was tested with the agar disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2020), including aminoglycosides [amikacin (30 μg) and gentamicin (10 μg)], carbapenems (meropenem, 10 μg), 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins [ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg) and ceftriaxone (30 μg)], penicillins (ampicillin, 10 μg), sulfonamides (trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, 1.25/23.75 μg), phenicols (chloramphenicol, 30 μg), and tetracyclines (tetracycline, 30 μg). Colistin resistance was determined, according to the Danish Bacterial Resistance Surveillance System (DAN–MAP), and the MICs of E. coli suspected to be resistant to colistin were assessed by the broth microdilution method using Mueller–Hinton Ⅱ Broth (Solarbio, Beijing, China). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain, and resistance (R), sensitivity (S), or intermediate (I) were attributed, according to the criteria of the CLSI. Furthermore, ESBL E. coli was screened by the double-disk synergy test using ceftazidime and cefotaxime with and without clavulanic acid on MH agar. When the inhibition zone diameter obtained with clavulanic acid increased by ≥5 mm, compared with that without clavulanic acid, the isolate was considered positive for ESBL.
The ESBL producers from 2012–2013 were re-tested for their antimicrobial resistance phenotype using the BD Phoenix-100™ automatic microbiological identification/drug susceptibility system, as described above. The MAR index was determined according to the method described by Krumperman [55].

4.4. Detection of ARGs (Antibiotic Resistance Genes)

All ESBL-producing E. coli isolated between 2012–2021 were screened for ARGs, including (1) extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaOXA-1, and blaTEM, (2) tetracycline resistance genes tet (A), tet (B), tet (M), and tet (X1–X5), (3) sulfonamide resistance (sulR) genes sul1, sul2, and sul3, (4) chloramphenicol resistance genes cmlA and floR, (5) aminoglycoside resistance genes aac (3)-II, aac (6′)-Ib, armA, and rmtB, (6) fluoroquinolone resistance genes qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrS, and aac (6′)-Ib-cr. Carbapenemase and colistin resistance genes (blaNDM, blaKPC, blaIMP, and mcr-1–5) were screened depending on the antimicrobial resistance (Table S8). The amplicons obtained were evaluated and analyzed using a UV gel imaging system after electrophoresis. The positive amplicons were randomly selected for sequencing (Comate Bioscience Company Ltd., Changchun, China), and the sequences were analyzed using the BLAST program available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/, accessed on 12 June 2022).

4.5. Phylogenetic Grouping

DNA templates were made by the boiling method [56]. All ESBL producers between 2012–2021 and E. coli isolates obtained in 2021 were amplified with chuA, yjaA, TspE4C2, and arpA, according to the multiplex PCR method described by Clermont et al. [57]. The phylogroups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, and F) were identified according to the different amplified fragment sizes. Sterile distilled water was the negative control, and the positive control was the strain template mixture preserved in this trial.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

We tested for statistical significance using the chi-square test of independence in SPSS 20.0 software (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Pearson’s chi-squared test, Yate’s correction for continuity, and Fisher’s exact test were used in statistical significance when no/one/two or more cell counts in a 2 × 2 table were less than 5, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was regarded as the criterion for statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

With the restrictions on the use of antibiotics in China, the antimicrobial resistance of E. coli in companion dogs is on the decline. Companion cats may be potential hosts for E. coli, causing extraintestinal disease in humans. Compared with pet dogs, the problem of drug-resistant bacteria carried by pet cats has become prominent; in particular, the high prevalence of ESBL E. coli, which belong to the B2 group in fecal samples from pet cats deserves further study. Our data helped to fill the gap in the knowledge of intestinal E. coli resistance in working dogs. All ESBL E. coli carrying blaNDM were isolated from working dogs, and one of them carried mcr-1 and blaNDM-4. The problem of drug-resistant bacteria in working dogs is often neglected and needs to be paid attention. As animals in close contact with humans, the public health risk associated with dogs and cats carrying MDR zoonotic pathogens requires continued concern.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11111506/s1-s8, Table S1: Antibacterial resistance patterns for E. coli; Table S2: Percentages of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli of different origins and years; Table S3: Drug resistance pattern of E. coli. Table S4: Percentage of antimicrobial resistance in ESBL-E. coli of different origins and years; Table S5: Drug resistance pattern of ESBL-E. coli; Table S6: Detection rates of drug resistance genes; Table S7: Phylogenetic grouping of E. coli in 2021; Table S8: Phylogenetic grouping of ESBL-E. coli; Table S9: Collection Information of E. coli; Table S10: PCR primers and conditions; Figure S1: Drug resistance pattern of E. coli. References [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73] are mentioned in Supplementary Materials File.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and X.J.; methodology, X.J.; software, T.Y.; validation, Y.Z.; formal analysis, B.L. and J.L.; investigation, Y.Z., T.Y. and Y.L.; resources, X.G.; data curation, Y.Z. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.; visualization, B.J.; supervision, L.Z.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant no. 2018ZX10733402).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pomba, C.; Rantala, M.; Greko, C.; Baptiste, K.E.; Catry, B.; van Duijkeren, E.; Mateus, A.; Moreno, M.A.; Pyorala, S.; Ruzauskas, M.; et al. Public health risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 957–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marques, C.; Belas, A.; Franco, A.; Aboim, C.; Gama, L.T.; Pomba, C. Increase in antimicrobial resistance and emergence of major international high-risk clonal lineages in dogs and cats with urinary tract infection: 16 year retrospective study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Feng, Y.; Mannion, A.; Madden, C.M.; Swennes, A.G.; Townes, C.; Byrd, C.; Marini, R.P.; Fox, J.G. Cytotoxic Escherichia coli strains encoding colibactin and cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF) colonize laboratory macaques. Gut Pathog. 2017, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Denamur, E.; Clermont, O.; Bonacorsi, S.; Gordon, D. The population genetics of pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marchetti, L.; Buldain, D.; Gortari Castillo, L.; Buchamer, A.; Chirino-Trejo, M.; Mestorino, N. Pet and stray dogs as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021, 2021, 6664557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cummins, E.A.; Snaith, A.E.; McNally, A.; Hall, R.J. The role of potentiating mutations in the evolution of pandemic Escherichia coli clones. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ur Rahman, S.; Ali, T.; Ali, I.; Khan, N.A.; Han, B.; Gao, J. The growing genetic and functional diversity of extended spectrum beta-lactamases. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9519718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Derakhshandeh, A.; Eraghi, V.; Boroojeni, A.M.; Niaki, M.A.; Zare, S.; Naziri, Z. Virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes and genetic relatedness of commensal Escherichia coli isolates from dogs and their owners. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alves, J.C.; Jorge, P.; Santos, A. A survey on the prevalence of diarrhea in a Portuguese population of police working dogs. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhat, A.H. Bacterial zoonoses transmitted by household pets and as reservoirs of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 155, 104891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wedley, A.L.; Dawson, S.; Maddox, T.W.; Coyne, K.P.; Pinchbeck, G.L.; Clegg, P.; Nuttall, T.; Kirchner, M.; Williams, N.J. Carriage of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli in dogs: Prevalence, associated risk factors and molecular characteristics. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, X.; Thungrat, K.; Boothe, D.M. Multilocus sequence typing and virulence profiles in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from cats in the United States. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143335. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sevilla, E.; Mainar-Jaime, R.C.; Moreno, B.; Martin-Burriel, I.; Morales, M.; Andres-Lasheras, S.; Chirino-Trejo, M.; Badiola, J.J.; Bolea, R. Antimicrobial resistance among canine enteric Escherichia coli isolates and prevalence of attaching-effacing and extraintestinal pathogenic virulence factors in Spain. Acta Vet. Hung. 2020, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leonard, E.K.; Pearl, D.L.; Finley, R.L.; Janecko, N.; Reid-Smith, R.J.; Peregrine, A.S.; Weese, J.S. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli recovered from pet dogs from volunteer households in Ontario (2005-06). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saputra, S.; Jordan, D.; Mitchell, T.; Wong, H.S.; Abraham, R.J.; Kidsley, A.; Turnidge, J.; Trott, D.J.; Abraham, S. Antimicrobial resistance in clinical Escherichia coli isolated from companion animals in Australia. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 211, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hata, A.; Fujitani, N.; Ono, F.; Yoshikawa, Y. Surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in Sheltered dogs in the Kanto Region of Japan. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thongratsakul, S.; Poolkhet, C.; Amavisit, P.; Sato, T.; Fukuda, A.; Usui, M.; Tamura, Y. Antimicrobial resistance and Stec virulence genes of Escherichia coli isolated from non-diarrheic and diarrheic dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2019, 50, 708–714. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lei, T.; Tian, W.; He, L.; Huang, X.H.; Sun, Y.X.; Deng, Y.T.; Sun, Y.; Lv, D.H.; Wu, C.M.; Huang, L.Z.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from food animals, animal food products and companion animals in China. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 146, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.Q.; Liu, H.X.; Li, Y.Q.; Hao, C.J. High prevalence of beta-lactamase and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes in extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from dogs in Shaanxi, China. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Hao, C. Association between virulence profile and fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from dogs and cats in China. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2017, 11, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Lei, L.; Xia, Z. Increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing multidrug resistance Escherichia coli From diseased pets in Beijing, China from 2012 to 2017. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, M.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Xia, Z.; Li, G. Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from canine urinary tract infections. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 241, 108540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shao, Y.T.; Wang, Y.P.; Yuan, Y.W.; Xie, Y.J. A systematic review on antibiotics misuse in livestock and aquaculture and regulation implications in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cui, L.Q.; Lei, L.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, R.M.; Liu, X.Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y. bla(NDM-1)-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from a companion dog in China. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 13, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stolle, I.; Prenger-Berninghoff, E.; Stamm, I.; Scheufen, S.; Hassdenteufel, E.; Guenther, S.; Bethe, A.; Pfeifer, Y.; Ewers, C. Emergence of OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in dogs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 2802–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Potter, R.F.; D’Souza, A.W.; Dantas, G. The rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 29, 30–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dickson, A.; Smith, M.; Smith, F.; Park, J.; King, C.; Currie, K.; Langdridge, D.; Davis, M.; Flowers, P. Understanding the relationship between pet owners and their companion animals as a key context for antimicrobial resistance-related behaviours: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 2019, 7, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, K.S.; Lin, L.; Zhou, X. Parental self-medication with antibiotics for children promotes antibiotic over-prescribing in clinical settings in China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Salgado-Caxito, M.; Benavides, J.A.; Adell, A.D.; Paes, A.C.; Moreno-Switt, A.I. Global prevalence and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing-Escherichia coli in dogs and cats—A scoping review and meta-analysis. One Health 2021, 12, 100236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, H.; Li, Q. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug resistant Escherichia coli from swine in Northwest China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Ma, L.; Cao, X.; Hu, W.; Zhao, L.; Jing, W.; Lan, X.; Li, Y.; et al. Genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase type of Escherichia coli isolates from chicken, dog, pig and yak in Gansu and Qinghai Provinces, China. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vega-Manriquez, X.D.; Ubiarco-Lopez, A.; Verdugo-Rodriguez, A.; Hernandez-Chinas, U.; Navarro-Ocana, A.; Ahumada-Cota, R.E.; Ramirez-Badillo, D.; Hernandez-Diaz de Leon, N.; Eslava, C.A. Pet dogs potential transmitters of pathogenic Escherichia coli with resistance to antimicrobials. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, M.; Li, L.; Qi, J.; et al. The prevalence of colistin resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from food animals in China: Coexistence of mcr-1 and blaNDM with low fitness cost. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al-Bayssari, C.; Nawfal Dagher, T.; El Hamoui, S.; Fenianos, F.; Makdissy, N.; Rolain, J.M.; Nasreddine, N. Carbapenem and colistin-resistant bacteria in North Lebanon: Coexistence of mcr-1 and NDM-4 genes in Escherichia coli. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2021, 15, 934-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zogg, A.L.; Simmen, S.; Zurfluh, K.; Stephan, R.; Schmitt, S.N.; Nuesch-Inderbinen, M. High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae among clinical isolates from cats and dogs admitted to a veterinary hospital in Switzerland. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hordijk, J.; Schoormans, A.; Kwakernaak, M.; Duim, B.; Broens, E.; Dierikx, C.; Mevius, D.; Wagenaar, J.A. High prevalence of fecal carriage of extended spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in cats and dogs. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hardefeldt, L.Y.; Holloway, S.; Trott, D.J.; Shipstone, M.; Barrs, V.R.; Malik, R.; Burrows, M.; Armstrong, S.; Browning, G.F.; Stevenson, M. Antimicrobial prescribing in dogs and cats in Australia: Results of the Australasian infectious disease advisory panel survey. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2017, 31, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gonzalez-Ramirez, M.T.; Landero-Hernandez, R. Pet-human relationships: Dogs versus cats. Animals 2021, 11, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yasugi, M.; Hatoya, S.; Motooka, D.; Matsumoto, Y.; Shimamura, S.; Tani, H.; Furuya, M.; Mie, K.; Miyake, M.; Nakamura, S.; et al. Whole-genome analyses of extended-spectrum or AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates from companion dogs in Japan. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiao, Y.; Hu, Y. The major aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme AAC(3)-II found in Escherichia coli determines a significant disparity in its resistance to gentamicin and amikacin in China. Microb. Drug Resist. 2012, 18, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mohanam, L.; Menon, T. Emergence of rmtC and rmtF 16S rRNA methyltransferase in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 35, 282–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yousefi, A.; Torkan, S. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the urine samples of Iranian dogs: Antimicrobial resistance pattern and distribution of antibiotic resistance genes. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 4180490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Poirel, L.; Madec, J.Y.; Lupo, A.; Schink, A.K.; Kieffer, N.; Nordmann, P.; Schwarz, S. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Enne, V.I.; Bennett, P.M.; Livermore, D.M.; Hall, L.M.C. Enhancement of host fitness by the sul2-coding plasmid p9123 in the absence of selective pressure. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, 958–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kotb, D.N.; Mahdy, W.K.; Mahmoud, M.S.; Khairy, R.M.M. Impact of co-existence of PMQR genes and QRDR mutations on fluoroquinolones resistance in Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from community and hospital acquired UTIs. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, A.Y.; Wang, H.N.; Tian, G.B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Xia, Q.Q.; Tang, J.N.; Zou, L.K. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of antimicrobial resistance in faecal bacteria from 30 Giant pandas. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Strahilevitz, J.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C.; Robicsek, A. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: A multifaceted threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 664–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pitout, J.D.D. Infections with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae changing epidemiology and drug treatment choices. Drugs 2010, 70, 313–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Karahutova, L.; Mandelik, R.; Bujnakova, D. Antibiotic resistant and biofilm-associated Escherichia coli isolates from diarrheic and healthy dogs. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hutton, T.A.; Innes, G.K.; Harel, J.; Garneau, P.; Cucchiara, A.; Schifferli, D.M.; Rankin, S.C. Phylogroup and virulence gene association with clinical characteristics of Escherichia coli urinary tract infections from dogs and cats. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2018, 30, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tenaillon, O.; Skurnik, D.; Picard, B.; Denamur, E. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010, 8, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Skurnik, D.; Le Menac’h, A.; Zurakowski, D.; Mazel, D.; Courvalin, P.; Denamur, E.; Andremont, A.; Ruimy, R. Integron-associated antibiotic resistance and phylogenetic grouping of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy subjects free of recent antibiotic exposure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3062–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shahi, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Kumar, A. Detection of Escherichia coli and associated beta-lactamases genes from diabetic foot ulcers by multiplex PCR and molecular modeling and docking of SHV-1, TEM-1, and OXA-1 beta-lactamases with clindamycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Krumperman, P.H. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 46, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Askari, A.; Ghanbarpour, R.; Akhtardanesh, B.; Aflatoonian, M.R.; Sharifi, H.; Jajarmi, M.; Molaei, R. Detection of zoonotic diarrheagenic pathotypes of Escherichia coli in healthy household dogs. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2020, 12, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Clermont, O.; Christenson, J.K.; Denamur, E.; Gordon, D.M. The Clermont Escherichia coliphylo-typing method revisited: Improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jemima, S.A.; Verghese, S. Multiplex PCR for bla(CTX-M) & bla(SHV) in the extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram-negative isolates. Indian J Med Res 2008, 128, 313–317. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lin, C.F.; Hsu, S.K.; Chen, C.H.; Huang, J.R.; Lo, H.H. Genotypic detection and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a regional hospital in central Taiwan. J Med Microbiol 2010, 59, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Al-Agamy, M.H.; Aljallal, A.; Radwan, H.H.; Shibl, A.M. Characterization of carbapenemases, ESBLs, and plasmid-mediated quinolone determinants in carbapenem-insensitive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Riyadh hospitals. J. Infect. Public Health 2018, 11, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sengeløv, G.; Agersø, Y.; Halling-Sørensen, B.; Baloda, S.B.; Andersen, J.S.; Jensen, L.B. Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treatment with pig manure slurry. Environ. Int. 2003, 28, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ng, L.K.; Martin, I.; Alfa, M.; Mulvey, M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell Probe. 2001, 15, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ji, K.; Xu, Y.C.; Sun, J.; Huang, M.; Jia, X.; Jiang, C.J.; Feng, Y.J. Harnessing efficient multiplex PCR methods to detect the expanding Tet(X) family of tigecycline resistance genes. Virulence 2020, 11, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Luo, Y.; Mao, D.Q.; Rysz, M.; Zhou, D.X.; Zhang, H.J.; Xu, L.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Trends in antibiotic resistance genes occurrence in the Haihe River, China. Environ Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7220–7225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Robicsek, A.; Strahilevitz, J.; Sahm, D.F.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. qnr prevalence in ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2872–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liao, C.H.; Hsueh, P.R.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. Risk factors and clinical characteristics of patients with qnr-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 2907–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Robicsek, A.; Strahilevitz, J.; Jacoby, G.A.; Macielag, M.; Abbanat, D.; Park, C.H.; Bush, K.; Hooper, D.C. Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: A new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, L.; Chen, Z.L.; Liu, J.H.; Zeng, Z.L.; Ma, J.Y.; Jiang, H.X. Emergence of RmtB methylase-producing Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae isolates from pigs in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 880–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wen, J.T.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, L.; Xu, Y. Multidrug-resistant genes of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes and 16S rRNA methylases in Acinetobacter baumannii strains. Genet. Mol. Res. 2014, 13, 3842–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Alizadeh, N.; Rezaee, M.A.; Kafil, H.S.; Hasani, A.; Barhaghi, M.H.S.; Milani, M.; Sefidan, F.Y.; Memar, M.Y.; Lalehzadeh, A.; Ghotaslou, R. Evaluation of Resistance Mechanisms in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 1377–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Warburg, G.; Hidalgo-Grass, C.; Partridge, S.R.; Tolmasky, M.E.; Temper, V.; Moses, A.E.; Block, C.; Strahilevitz, J. A carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae epidemic clone in Jerusalem: Sequence type 512 carrying a plasmid encoding aac(6)-Ib. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2012, 67, 898–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Feng, Y.; Liu, L.; Lin, J.; Ma, K.; Long, H.Y.; Wei, L.; Xie, Y.; McNally, A.; Zong, Z.Y. Key evolutionary events in the emergence of a globally disseminated, carbapenem resistant clone in the Escherichia coli ST410 lineage. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rebelo, A.R.; Bortolaia, V.; Kjeldgaard, J.S.; Pedersen, S.K.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Hansen, I.M.; Guerra, B.; Malorny, B.; Borowiak, M.; Hammerl, J.A.; et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 11 01506 g001 550
Figure 1. MAR index of E. coli of different origins and years.
Figure 1. MAR index of E. coli of different origins and years.
Antibiotics 11 01506 g001
Antibiotics 11 01506 g002 550
Figure 2. Trends of resistance to various antibiotics of 554 E. coli isolates from different origins between 2012–2021 (the depth of color of the rectangle represents the degree of resistance of the isolates to the antibiotic, and the darker the color, the stronger the drug resistance). AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; MEN, meropenem; CAZ, ceftazidime; AMP, ampicillin; CST, colistin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; CHL, chloramphenicol; TET, tetracycline. Notes: the antibiotics listed in Figure 2 only include the antibiotics tested against all E. coli.
Figure 2. Trends of resistance to various antibiotics of 554 E. coli isolates from different origins between 2012–2021 (the depth of color of the rectangle represents the degree of resistance of the isolates to the antibiotic, and the darker the color, the stronger the drug resistance). AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; MEN, meropenem; CAZ, ceftazidime; AMP, ampicillin; CST, colistin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; CHL, chloramphenicol; TET, tetracycline. Notes: the antibiotics listed in Figure 2 only include the antibiotics tested against all E. coli.
Antibiotics 11 01506 g002
Antibiotics 11 01506 g003 550
Figure 3. Resistance gene profiles and resistance patterns of 12 ESBL E. coli, which were resistant to carbapenems or colistin. Black squares indicate gene presence. A. Aminoglycoside resistance genes; B. blaESBL; C. carbapenem resistance genes; D. colistin resistance genes; E. sulfonamide resistance genes; F. chloramphenicol resistance genes; G. fluoroquinolone resistance genes; H. tetracycline resistance genes; WD. working dog; CD. companion dog; CC. companion cat; PG. phylogenetic groups.
Figure 3. Resistance gene profiles and resistance patterns of 12 ESBL E. coli, which were resistant to carbapenems or colistin. Black squares indicate gene presence. A. Aminoglycoside resistance genes; B. blaESBL; C. carbapenem resistance genes; D. colistin resistance genes; E. sulfonamide resistance genes; F. chloramphenicol resistance genes; G. fluoroquinolone resistance genes; H. tetracycline resistance genes; WD. working dog; CD. companion dog; CC. companion cat; PG. phylogenetic groups.
Antibiotics 11 01506 g003
Table
Table 1. blaESBL types of ESBL producers from 2012 to 2021.
Table 1. blaESBL types of ESBL producers from 2012 to 2021.
blaESBL2012–20132015202120212021
Pet DogsPet DogsPet DogsPet CatsWorking Dogs
blaCTX-M 20 15291817
blaTEM00002
blaCTX-M+TEM1310302028
blaCTX-M+OXA-141040
blaCTX-M+TEM+OXA-141111
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of the blaCTX-M gene and antibiotic resistance of MDR E. coli in 2021.
Table 2. Prevalence of the blaCTX-M gene and antibiotic resistance of MDR E. coli in 2021.
AntibioticblaCTX-M Positive (n = 149)blaCTX-M Negative (n = 102)p-Value
Amikacin13.42%9.80%0.385
Gentamicin61.74%32.35%<0.001 **
Imipenem2.01%3.92%0.447
Meropenem1.34%0.98%1.000
Cefazolin100.00%12.75%<0.001 **
Ceftazidime7.38%2.94%0.132
Cefotaxime91.28%0.98%<0.001 **
Cefepime86.58%0.98%<0.001 **
Aztreonam60.40%0.00%<0.001 **
Ampicillin100.00%95.10%0.010 *
Piperacillin100.00%81.37%<0.001 **
Amoxicillin–Clavulanate4.03%10.78%0.036 *
Ampicillin–Sulbactam41.61%33.33%0.185
Piperacillin–Tazobactam3.36%0.98%0.406
Colistin4.03%1.96%0.479
Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole60.40%72.55%0.047 *
Chloramphenicol53.69%47.06%0.302
Ciprofloxacin47.65%32.35%0.016 *
Levofloxacin46.31%30.39%0.011 *
Moxifloxacin52.35%33.33%0.003 *
Tetracycline85.91%91.18%0.206
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.; Ji, X.; Liang, B.; Jiang, B.; Li, Y.; Yuan, T.; Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, X.; Sun, Y. Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli from Dogs and Cats in Northeastern China from 2012 to 2021. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111506

AMA Style

Zhou Y, Ji X, Liang B, Jiang B, Li Y, Yuan T, Zhu L, Liu J, Guo X, Sun Y. Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli from Dogs and Cats in Northeastern China from 2012 to 2021. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(11):1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yifan, Xue Ji, Bing Liang, Bowen Jiang, Yan Li, Tingyv Yuan, Lingwei Zhu, Jun Liu, Xuejun Guo, and Yang Sun. 2022. "Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli from Dogs and Cats in Northeastern China from 2012 to 2021" Antibiotics 11, no. 11: 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop