Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic-Resistant Genes and Bacteria as Evolving Contaminants of Emerging Concerns (e-CEC): Is It Time to Include Evolution in Risk Assessment?
Previous Article in Journal
Compound Prioritization through Meta-Analysis Enhances the Discovery of Antimicrobial Hits against Bacterial Pathogens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/antibiotics10091063
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The First Report of mcr-1-Carrying Escherichia coli Originating from Animals in Serbia

by
Dušan Mišić
1,*,
Ferenc Kiskaroly
2,
Michael P. Szostak
3,
Adriana Cabal
4,
Werner Ruppitsch
4,
Tanja Bernreiter-Hofer
3,5,
Viktoria Milovanovic
3,
Andrea T. Feßler
6,
Franz Allerberger
4,
Joachim Spergser
3,
Elke Müller
7,8,
Stefan Schwarz
6,
Sascha D. Braun
7,8,
Stefan Monecke
7,8,9,
Ralf Ehricht
7,8,10,
Maciej Korus
1,
Damir Benković
11,
Malgorzata Korzeniowska
1 and
Igor Loncaric
3
1
Department of Functional Food Products Development, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Bacteriology, Veterinary Specialistic Institute “Subotica”, 24000 Subotica, Serbia
3
Institute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1010 Vienna, Austria
4
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, 1090 Vienna, Austria
5
Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University Clinic for Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria
6
Centre for Infection Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
7
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), 07745 Jena, Germany
8
InfectoGnostics Research Campus, 07743 Jena, Germany
9
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Dresden University Hospital, 01307 Dresden, Germany
10
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
11
Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Veterinary Specialized Institute “Sombor”, 25000 Sombor, Serbia
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(9), 1063; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091063
Received: 23 July 2021 / Revised: 16 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 3 September 2021
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was continuous monitoring of the presence of mcr-1 to mcr-5 genes in Enterobacterales isolated from cattle, pigs, and domestic poultry at intensive breeding facilities in Northern Vojvodina, Serbia, from 1 January 1 to 1 October 2020. Out of 2167 examined samples, mcr-1 was observed in five E. coli isolates originating from healthy turkeys. Four isolates belonged to the phylogenetic group B1, and one isolate to the phylogenetic group A. Detected E. coli serogenotypes (somatic O and flagellar H antigens) were O8:H25 and O29:H25. Core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) revealed three ST58 isolates clustering together in Clonal Complex (CC) 155 and two singletons of ST641-CC86 and ST410-CC23, respectively. Clonotyping revealed CH4-32 (n = 3), CH6-53 (n = 1) and CH4-24 (n = 1). In all isolates, the mcr-1 gene was located on a large IncX4 replicon type plasmid. Eight virulence-associated genes (VAGs) typical of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) (fyuA, fimH, hlyF, iss, ompT, sitA, traT, iroN) were detected in four isolates. These isolates were investigated for susceptibility to four biocides and revealed MIC values of 0.125% for glutardialdehyde, of 0.00003–0.00006% for chlorohexidine, of 4–6% for isopropanol and of 0.001–0.002% for benzalkonium chloride. All obtained MIC values of the tested biocides were comparable to the reference strain, with no indication of possible resistance. This is the first report of mcr-1.1-carrying E. coli from Serbia. Although only samples from turkeys were mcr-positive in this study, continuous monitoring of livestock samples is advised to prevent a spill-over from animals to humans.

1. Introduction

Colistin (polymyxin E) was introduced into medical and veterinary clinical practice in the early 1950s [1] but due to its high toxicity, systemic administration of colistin in humans was restricted for decades [2]. However, the emergence of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to critically important antibiotics for humans, especially to carbapenems, led to the gradual reintroduction of colistin into human medicine as a last resort antibiotic for the systemic treatment of severe nosocomial infections [1,2,3,4]. In contrast to human medicine, colistin has been widely used in large quantities in animals on all continents contributing to the emergence of resistance [1,2].
Colistin resistance may be mediated by chromosomal mutations or encoded by transferable, plasmid-mediated mcr genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10) [2,5]. Retrospective studies have shown that the mcr-1 gene was present in bacteria that originated from poultry in China as early as in the 1980s, and that the increased mcr prevalence from 2015 coincided with the intensification of epidemiological studies of this topic [6,7]. The mcr genes were found in bacteria isolated from humans, pigs, cattle, veal calves, broilers, chicken, turkeys, dogs, cats, food and water specimens from 57 countries, including 19 countries from Europe [1,7]. The mcr variants were mostlty found in E. coli and different Salmonella serovars, but also in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Shigella sonnei, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, members of Cronobacter, Kluyvera, Citrobacter, Providencia, Raoultella and Moraxella genera [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].
In comparison to isolates of human origin, the prevalence of mcr in bacteria from animals and food seems to be higher. Moreover, the co-occurrence with florfenicol resistance, which is a purely veterinary antibiotic, indicates that colistin resistance mediated by mcr genes may be transmitted from animals to humans or even via the food chain [6,8,9,10,11,12]. Consequently, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and World Health Organization (WHO) re-categorized colistin as “restricted” for medical and veterinary use due to its potential risk for Public Health [1,13,14,15]. However, there are countries in which the use of colistin is still approved as a growth promoter in food animals. This includes nine countries from Latin America, Asia, Africa and Oceania [15,16,17].
Although colistin-resistant Enterobacterales have been previously found in both humans and animals in Serbia [18,19], the associated resistance mechanisms have been linked to chromosomal mutations, and no mcr genes have been detected so far. Concern among the scientific and medical community that the efficacy of colistin could be lost due to the rapid spread of the mcr genes, and the continuous emergence of new mcr alleles, requires further research.

2. Results

Colistin-resistant isolates were neither found in the chicken, hen and cattle samples nor in those from pigs. However, five different colistin-resistant E. coli isolates (isolate IDs: 51, 52, 15/2, 16/2, and 72/2) were detected. These isolates had been obtained in June 2020 from intestines of turkeys from the same farm. The turkeys were 12-weeks old, clinically healthy and originated from incubator stations in Croatia (imported as one day old chicks). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was not performed during the quarantine of the animals. Isolates displayed colistin MICs of 2 µg/mL (51, 15/2, 16/2) and 8 µg/mL (52, 72/2) and all carried the mcr-1.1 gene. The turkeys from which the isolates were obtained had not been treated with antibiotics before the time of the sampling and farmers denied having used colistin on the birds. According to mlplasmids analyses, the mcr-1.1 gene might be located on plasmids.
Four of the five isolates (51, 15/2, 16/2 and 72/2) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent from three different classes and thus categorized as multidrug-resistant (MDR) (Table 1.).
Isolate 72/2 was resistant to antibiotics from 6 different classes. Solely isolate 52 was resistant to only ampicillin and colistin. All isolates carried the blaTEM-1 gene and were resistant to ampicillin. Tetracycline resistance encoded by the gene tet(A) was detected in four isolates, except for isolate 72/2, in which the tetracycline resistance genes tet(A) and tet(M) were detected. Resistance to ciprofloxacin and the presence of the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) gene qnrS1 was found in three isolates. One isolate carried the qnrS1 gene. Mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of gyrA and/or parC were also found. Within the GyrA region, Ser83Leu substitutions were detected in four isolates. In isolate 72/2, an Asp87Asn substitution in GyrA and a Ser80Ile substitution in ParC were found. In addition, resistance to the combination trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol and florfenicol, and the related antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) sul2, sul3, dfrA12, and cmlA1 were found in isolate 72/2. The obviously inactive genes aadA1 and aadA2 were detected in isolate 72/2, while strA and strB genes were found in isolate 51.
Isolates 51, 52, 15/2 and 16/2 belonged to the phylogenetic group B1 and isolate 72 to the phylogenetic group A (Table 1). Detected E. coli serogenotypes (somatic O and flagellar H antigens) were O8:H25 and O29:H25. Sequence types (STs), that were extracted from the Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data, belonged to ST 58 (15/2, 16/2, 51) and clonal complex (CC) 155. WGS-based core genome MLST (cgMLST) revealed that these three isolates clustered together. The other two isolates 52 and 72/2 represented the singletones ST641-CC86 and ST410-CC23, respectively. Clonotyping revealed CH4-32 (n-3), CH6-53 (n = 1) and CH4-24 (n = 1). Taken together, mcr-1.1-carrying E. coli isolates belonged to three different clones: B1-O8:H25-ST58-CH4-32 (isolates 51, 15/2, 16/2), B1-O29:H25-ST641-CH6-53 (isolate 52) and A-O8:H25-ST410-CH4-24 (isolate 72/2). They shared between 96.18 and 100% DNA similarity with corresponding reference sequences.
Of the 10 selected NCBI E. coli genomes belonging to different sources and included in the genomic comparison, none of them clustered together with any of our isolates. The closest isolate of ST410 to our isolates differed by 133 or more alleles (LJGG01.1). Regarding ST58, the closest isolate presented more than 75 or more allelic differences (JAALBY01.1) with our isolates and for ST641, at least 79 or more allelic differences were seen between an NCBI isolates (NNWW01.1) and our ST641 isolates (Figure 1).
In total, six different plasmids, IncFIB(AP001918) (isolates 15/2, 16/2, 51, 72/2), IncFII(pRSB107) (isolates 15/2, 16/2, 51), IncX1 (all isolates), IncX4 (all isolates), IncFII (isolate 72/2), and p0111 (isolate 72/2) were identified.
The presence of eight virulence-associated genes (VAGs) (fyuA, fimH, hlyF, iss, ompT, sitA, traT, iroN) typical of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) was detected in the isolates belonging to B1-O8:H25-ST155-CH4-32 and B1-O29:H25-ST641-CH6-53). We also detected the uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) fyuA gene in the same isolates. A list of all detected VAGs is shown in Table 2.
Biocide susceptibility testing revealed, that all mcr-1-carrying E. coli isolates, except isolate 72/2, had benzalkonium chloride (BAC) MIC values of 0.001%. The remaining isolate had a MIC value for BAC of 0.002%. Chlorhexidine (CHX) MIC values for three isolates (51, 15/2, 16/2) were 0.00006% and for the remaining two isolates (52 and 72/2) 0.00003%. MIC values for isopropanol were 4% for isolates 51, 16/2, 72/2 and 6% for isolates 52 and 15/2. All tested isolates showed a glutaraldehyde (GDH) MIC value of 0.125% (Table 3). The obtained MIC values for all biocides had comparable -MIC ranges to E. coli ATCC® 10536.

3. Discussion

Our work presents the results of a continuous monitoring study on phenotypic colistin resistance and the presence of mcr-1 to mcr-5 genes in Enterobacterales isolated from cattle, pigs, and domestic poultry (turkeys, laying hens, broilers) at intensive breeding facilities in Northern Vojvodina, Serbia, from 1 January to 1 October 2020.
A total of five mcr-1.1-carrying E. coli isolates were obtained from turkeys in June 2020. According to the local authorities, the turkeys of that farm had not been treated with antibiotics, including colistin. The origin of these isolates remains unclear, since it was not possible to prove an epidemiological link with Croatia (the origin of the respective turkey chicks), especially when considering that mcr genes have not yet been reported in Croatia, neither in humans nor in animals. Moreover, samples were taken again in September 2020 at the same farm from newly imported turkey chicks, as well as from farm workers, but neither an mcr gene nor phenotypically colistin-resistant isolates were detected. Likewise, E. coli clones belonging to ST640, ST58 and ST410 have not been reported in Croatia so far, neither in humans nor in animals. However, chromosomal colistin resistance due to mutations has been previously detected in Croatia [20,21,22].
Despite many published papers on the finding of mcr-1 genes in bacteria originating from humans, animals, food, and the environment, it is still difficult to gain accurate insight into the distribution and epidemiology of mcr-carrying bacteria of animal origin. Large and comprehensive epidemiological and surveillance studies involving different animal species are still rare, and most publications deal with reports on single isolates [23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
The hypothesis that colistin resistance encoded by mcr genes is most often transmitted from animals to humans is mostly based on the findings of a higher prevalence of mcr-carrying bacteria in animals than in humans [1,6,7,8,11,30]. Another hypothesis is that there is a positive correlation between colistin resistance and colistin usage rates in animals [1,30,31]. The latter is well-founded by data from countries where colistin is not used in animals or its use is minimal. For instance, in Iceland, Norway, Finland and Denmark, where the sale of colistin quantities is negligible or non-existent, no mcr gene has been reported in bacteria obtained from animal sources or, when mcr was found, it was more commonly detected in imported animals or imported meat products [7,31,32]. This observation is similar in the USA, where colistin is not approved for use in food-producing animals, and so far, only two mcr-1-carrying E. coli isolates have been reported from pigs in an intensive breeding farm [33] and one from a pork meat sample [34]. The same hypothesis is supported by the data on the enormous consumption of colistin in China. China is the largest user of colistin in animals, and so far, the largest number of mcr-carrying isolates (>2500) have been found in samples from animals in that country [7]. Although a positive correlation between the consumption of colistin and the prevalence of the mcr gene has been demonstrated, the distribution of colistin-resistant and/or mcr-carrying strains may be influenced by other factors. A retrospective study including 250 E. coli isolated from health pigs between 2004 and 2007 in Japan, where the use of colistin is allowed not only in food-producing animals but also as growth promoter, reported the absence of colistin-resistant E. coli isolates [35]. In contrast, another report showed a positive association between the use of colistin in pigs and the occurrence of 13% of mcr-1-carrying pathogenic E. coli in pigs in that country [36]. Whether or not the positive association between the consumption and the occurrence of resistance to colistin has been proved, there are indications that may support this. The spread of mcr, except direct selection is also influenced by cross-selection, co-selection (consumption of antibiotics other than colistin), unknown biological mechanisms, negative fitness of bacteria carrying mcr genes, clonal spreading, insects, age of the animals, pathogenic or commensal microorganism as well as the type of samples—usually the highest prevalence of mcr was found in pathogenic bacteria originated from young animals and fecal samples compared to indicator E. coli isolated from swabs or intestinal contents [35,37,38,39].
Results of a large number of studies have shown that the prevalence of the mcr-1 gene tends to be higher in E. coli originating from turkeys, regardless of the colistin usage rate. However, this should not be considered as a general rule, as other factors might be associated, including geographical variation. In France, for instance, the prevalence of mcr-1-carrying E. coli reported between 2011 and 2014 was significantly higher in turkeys (5.9%) than in broilers (1.6–1.8%) and in pigs (<1%) [40]. Germany, one of the largest consumers of colistin in veterinary medicine in the EU, but also the largest pig producer in Europe, the prevalence of mcr-carrying E. coli seemed to be higher in turkeys than in pigs [39,41]. According to Irrgang et al. [38], the detected prevalence of mcr-1-carrying E. coli originating from turkeys in Germany was 10.2% in 2010, 17.9% in 2011, 11.7% in 2012 and 10.4% in 2014. The same source stated that the prevalence of mcr-1-carrying E. coli in pigs in 2011 and 2015 was 1.5%. Another retrospective study [28] stated that of a total of 577 isolates collected from humans, animals, and food in Germany between 2009 and 2016, including a total of 424 E. coli from livestock, only three mcr-1-carrying E. coli originated from pigs. A slightly higher prevalence of 9.9% mcr-1-carrying E. coli in pigs was detected in a German retrospective study from 2011–2012 [39]. However, such findings should be taken with caution, since the isolates originated from pooled fecal samples that were pre-selected by growth on selective media supplemented with cefotaxime and enrofloxacin.
Italy and Spain were considered countries where the use of polymyxins in animal production was the highest in the EU [1,31], coinciding also with a high prevalence of mcr genes in E. coli from animal origin including turkeys. In Italy, 19.3% of mcr-1-carrying E. coli was detected in turkeys in 2013 [1], increasing to 22.9% and 25.9% in 2014 and 2015, respectively [1,42]. During the same period, the prevalence of mcr-1-carrying E. coli in fattening pigs was reported to be 0.6–6.5% [43]. In another Italian study, about 75% (n = 51) of the E. coli from diarrheal pigs retrieved during 2015–2016 were mcr-1-positive [44]. Regarding wildlife, other authors in Italy have reported 44.6% (n = 168) of the E. coli isolated from haunted wild boars as either mcr-1- or mcr-2-positive, which was the basis to hypothesize that wild boars may be a reservoir of colistin-resistant isolates [45].
In Serbia, colistin resistance has already been reported in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from animals and humans, but the mechanisms have been always linked to chromosomal mutations [18,19,46]. Based on data of the Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of the Republic of Serbia [47], consumption of colistin in veterinary medicine has been continuously declining in Serbia since 2011, with the most noticeable decline occurring in the period from 2016 to 2018. Unfortunately, there are no official data on the usage of colistin in animal production for the years 2019 and 2020 and hence, comparisons with other countries are not possible. However, the use of antibiotics as a growth promoter, including colistin, has been officially banned in Serbia since 2010.
As shown in retrospective studies, E. coli strains of ST410, ST58 and ST641 carrying the mcr-1 gene are present in animals across Europe since 2004 [48,49,50]. All E. coli clonal complexes found in our study (ST58, ST410 and ST641) have so far been associated with extraintestinal infections in humans and animals. E. coli ST410 has been found many times in humans (2002 in Canada, 2008 and 2010 in Spain, 2008 in Brazil, 2010 and 2014 in Norway) as well as in animals (2004 in cats, Germany; 2005 in dogs, Germany; 2009 in dogs, France; 2007 in turkeys, Germany; 2014 in pigs Thailand). E. coli ST641 has been reported from diseased humans (2007, Canada; 2009, Africa; 2016, USA), pigs (2004, Germany; 2011, Portugal; 2014, Thailand), fish (2001, Portugal), wild boars (2011 and 2015, Denmark), celery (2003, USA), beef (2016, USA) and chickens (2014, 2015, 2016, USA). E. coli ST58 has been detected in humans (2011, USA), chickens (2016, Africa), Cattle (2010, Ireland; 2018, 2019, USA), pigs (2005, Germany; 2009, China; 2019, USA), turkeys (2006, Germany; 2018, Netherlands) and dogs (2009, Netherlands) (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/index/ecoli, accessed on 23 June 2021) [49].
Some of the genes encoding virulence factors (VFs) found in mcr-1 carrying isolates in this study, (fyuA, fimH, hlyF, iss, ompT, sitA, traT, iroN) are typical for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and its subcategories-uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) [50]. FimH adhesins/type 1 fimbriae, are important for successful colonization of UPEC on the urinary bladder epithelium but it is also referred as a major virulence factor of E. coli belonging to APEC. At the same time, fimH, fyuA, hly, ompT and iroN are usually found in enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) isolated from both humans and animals [50]. Finding of those VFs is not sufficient for our strains to be categorized in any of the ExPEC categories, but because they were located in E. coli belonging to ST155 and ST641 which both were previously found in diseased humans and animals, pathogenic potential and possible risk for Public Health is indicated.
There is not much information in the scientific literature on the epidemiology and significance of E. coli O8:H25. E. coli belonged to this serotype has recently been isolated from chicken breast and beef samples in Brazil. Isolate possessed intimin but it was non-toxin producing, and was classified as atypical Enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) [51].
E. coli O29:H25 serotype, to our knowledge, has not been reported to this date and this is the first report of this serogenotype with the significance in veterinary medicine. E. coli O29 with another flagellar antigen type have been reported as shiga-toxin producing (enteroinvasive) strain isolated from humans [52]. Similarly, the H25 E. coli of a different somatic O antigenic structure was also found in shiga toxin-producing isolates [53].
Biocides are used to control infectious diseases on poultry farms and in slaughterhouses and can contribute to the emergence and spread of bacteria resistant to antibiotics [54,55]. In addition, resistance to biocides has already been reported. In our study, we wanted to test whether mcr-1 carrying E. coli isolates were sensitive to biocides widely used in animal production and veterinary medicine. Obtained MIC values of glutardialdehyde, isopropanol, benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine were unimodal, in acceptable ranges, equal to ranges previously established for E. coli ATCC® 10536.

4. Materials and Methods

The isolates were collected from 1 January 2020, to 1 October 2020, and included samples obtained in routine microbiological diagnostics at the Veterinary Specialist Institute in Subotica. A total of 2167 samples from intensive breeding farms in Northern Vojvodina, Serbia were processed, of which 1174 were from broilers, 502 from cattle, 332 from laying hens, 128 from pigs and 29 from turkeys. Specimens included feces, skin, nasal and rectal swabs and internal organs of dead animals. Intestinal samples taken from poultry, originated from healthy sacrificed birds as part of the routine control for the presence of Salmonella. Isolation of microorganisms and primary screening for colistin resistance were performed in the microbiological laboratory of the Veterinary Specialist Institute in Subotica. All samples were inoculated on MacConkey agar (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with 2 µg/mL colistin (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) [56]. Colonies selected from these MacConkey agar plates were identified to the species level by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonik, Heidelberg, Germany). Colistin MICs (0.125–256 µg/mL) were established with broth microdilution according to standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [57]. Isolates that displayed colistin MICs of ≥2 µg/mL were further characterized following a previously described multiplex-PCR protocol for the detection of the mcr-1 to -5 genes [58].
The mcr-1-carrying isolates were further tested for their antimicrobial susceptibility by agar disk diffusion according to CLSI [57]. The following disks were used: ampicillin (10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), and fosfomycin (200 µg) (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). E. coli ATCC® 25922 served as quality control strain for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production by ESBL-test via agar disk diffusion was performed using cefotaxime and ceftazidime with and without clavulanic acid (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany).
All mcr-1 positive isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Isolation of DNA for WGS was performed with MagAttract HMW DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) was used for the preparation of ready-to-sequence libraries. Paired-end-sequencing of the investigated E. coli was done using the Illumina MiSeq platform with a read length of 2 × 300 bp [59]. SPAdes v.3.9.0 was used for de novo construction of raw reads [60]. SeqSphere+ software (Ridom, Münster, Germany) was used for WGS data analysis. Genetic relatedness of the investigated mcr-1-carrying isolates was assessed with MLST and cgMLST following a previously described protocol [61]. The mcr-1-carrying E. coli phylotypes and CH types were established from data obtained in WGS using Clermontyping (http://clermontyping.iame-research.center/, accessed on 1 August 2021) and using CHTyper hosted at Center for Genomic Epidemiology (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/chtyper/, accessed on 1 August 2021) [62,63,64]. Resistance genes and/or chromosomal mutations were identified with Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD; https://card.mcmaster.ca/home, accessed on 1 August 2021) [65] as well as ResFinder 4.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/, accessed on 1 August 2021) [66,67]. Genes encoding virulence factors were identified using VirulenceFinder 2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/VirulenceFinder/, accessed on 1 August 2021) as well as a database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/, accessed on 1 August 2021) [68,69,70]. Serogenotypes were analyzed by SerotypeFinder (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SerotypeFinder/, accessed on 1 August 2021) [71]. PlasmidFinder 2.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/, accessed on 1 August 2021) was used for the plasmid presence detection [72]. Probability prediction of the location of a mcr gene was achieved by applying mlplasmids trained on E. coli (accessed on 1 August 2021) [73]. The genomes of WGS isolates were deposited under PRJNA725684 in the NCBI BioProject database.
Biocides susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution as described by Schug et al., [74] using chlorhexidine (CHX, Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), benzalkonium chloride (BAC, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), glutardialdehyde (GLU, Chempur, Piekary Slaskie, Poland) and ispopropanol (ISO, 99.9%, PHPU Eurochem BGD, Tarnow, Poland). Concentration ranges were 0.000015–0.016% for BAC, 0.000015–0.002% for CHX, 0.0075–1% for GLU and 1–14% for ISO. E. coli ATCC® 10536 (Microbiologics, St.Cloud, MN, USA) was tested for comparative reasons. This part of the investigation was performed at the Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science in Wroclaw. Each biocide concentration was tested in 12 replicates. Testing was repeated three times at different intervals.
Ethical opinion and approval were not needed for this study due to the fact that clinical samples were obtained within the routine microbiological diagnostics and only subsequently evaluated within the scope of this study and therefore not subjected for reporting to the Ethics Commission for the experimental animals’ welfare protection of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Belgrade, Serbia.

5. Conclusions

This is the first report of mcr-1.1-carrying E. coli from Serbia. Isolated strains belonged to ST410, ST58 and ST641 which were also previously never reported from Serbia, neither from humans nor animals. According to mlplasmids analyses, the mcr-1.1 genes might be located on plasmids. Despite the mcr-1 carrying E. coli were isolated from health animals, some of the detected virulence factors (fyuA, fimH, hlyF, iss, ompT, sitA, traT, iroN) are typical for ExPEC, therefore the pathogenic potential of these isolates and their significance for Public Health should not be excluded. All obtained MIC values of the tested biocides were in acceptable ranges, with no indication of possible resistance. Although only samples from turkeys were mcr-positive in this study, continuous monitoring of livestock samples is advised to prevent a spill-over from animals to humans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.L.; formal analysis, M.P.S., A.C., W.R., S.D.B. and I.L.; funding acquisition, D.M. and M.K. (Malgorzata Korzeniowska); investigation, D.M., F.K., V.M., F.A., S.M., M.K. (Maciej Korus) and I.L.; methodology, D.M., F.K., M.P.S., A.C., W.R., T.B.-H., A.T.F., F.A., E.M., S.S., S.D.B., S.M., R.E., M.K. (Maciej Korus), D.B. and I.L.; resources, F.K.; software, W.R.; supervision, I.L.; validation, A.T.F., S.S., R.E. and I.L.; writing—original draft, D.M.; writing—review and editing, M.P.S., A.C., W.R., T.B.-H., A.T.F., F.A., J.S., E.M., S.S., S.D.B., S.M., R.E., M.K. (Maciej Korus), D.B., M.K. (Malgorzata Korzeniowska) and I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The manuscript was co-funded by the Leading Research Groups support project from the subsidy increased for the period 2020–2025 in the amount of 2% of the subsidy referred to Art. 387 (3) of the Law of 20 July 2018 on Higher Education and Science, obtained in 2019. Project no: B190/0009/20 entitled: The ability of biofilm production in various adverse (extreme) environmental conditions of E. coli and Salmonella isolated from healthy and diseased hens, poultry farms and poultry feed factories.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical opinion and approval were not needed for this study due to clinical samples were obtained within the routine microbiological diagnostic and only subsequently evaluated within the scope of this study and therefore not subjected for reporting to the Ethics Commission for the experimental animals’ welfare protection of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Belgrade, Serbia.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EMA. Updated Advice on the Use of Colistin Products in Animals within the European Union: Development of Resistance and Possible Impact on Human and Animal Health. EMA/231573/2016. Document. 2016. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/updated-advice-use-colistin-products-animals-within-european-union-development-resistance-possible_en.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  2. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 557–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  3. Biswas, S.; Brunel, J.M.; Dubus, J.C.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Rolain, J.M. Colistin: An update on the antibiotic of the 21st century. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2012, 10, 917–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Nation, R.L.; Turnidge, J.D.; Milne, R.W.; Coulthard, K.; Rayner, C.R.; Paterson, D.L. Colistin: The re-emerging antibiotic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, C.; Feng, Y.; Liu, L.; Wei, L.; Kang, M.; Zong, Z. Identification of novel mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Shen, J.; Wu, C. Early emergence of mcr-1 in Escherichia coli from food-producing animals. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  7. Qixia, L.; Yuan, W.; Yonghong, X. Prevalence and transmission of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene in bacteria common to animals and humans. Biosafety Health 2020, 2, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elbediwi, M.; Li, Y.; Paudyal, N.; Pan, H.; Li, X.; Xie, S.; Rajkovic, A.; Feng, Y.; Fang, W.; Rankin, S.C.; et al. Global burden of colistin-resistant bacteria: Mobilized colistin resistance genes study (1980-2018). Microorganisms 2019, 7, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Díaz-Jiménez, D.; García-Meniñoa, I.; Fernández, J.; García, V.; Mora, A. Chicken and turkey meat: Consumer exposure to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae including mcr-carriers, uropathogenic E. coli and high-risk lineages such as ST131. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 331, 108750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schwarz, S.; Johnson, A.P. Transferable resistance to colistin: A new but old threat. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2066–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Poirel, L.; Kieffer, N.; Liassine, N.; Thanh, D.; Nordmann, P. Plasmid-mediated carbapenem and colistin resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  12. EMA. Countries Should Reduce Use of Colistin in Animals to Decrease the Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance, EMA/480583/2016. 2016. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/press-release/countries-should-reduce-use-colistin-animals-decrease-risk-antimicrobial-resistance_en.pdf. (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  13. EMA/CVMP/CHMP. Answer to the Request from the European Commission for Updating the Scientific Advice on the Impact on Public Health and Animal Health of the Use of Antibiotics in Animals-Categorisation of Antimicrobials EMA/CVMP/CHMP/682198/2017. 2019. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/answer-request-european-commission-updating-scientific-advice-impact-public-health-animal-health-use_en.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  14. WHO. Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine, 3rd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77376/1/9789241504485_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  15. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). 4th Annual Report on Antimicrobial Agents Intended for Use in Animals. 2020. Available online: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Our_scientific_expertise/docs/pdf/A_Fourth_Annual_Report_AMU.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  16. Wertheim, H.; Nguyen, K.V.; Hara, G.L.; Gelband, H.; Laxminarayan, R.; Mouton, J.; Cars, O. Global survey of polymyxin use: A call for international guidelines. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2013, 1, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Palmieri, M.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Pelegrin, A.C.; Mirande, C.; Brkic, S.; Cirkovic, I.; Goossens, H.; Rossolini, G.M.; van Belkum, A. Genomic Epidemiology of Carbapenem- and Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates From Serbia: Predominance of ST101 Strains Carrying a Novel OXA-48 Plasmid. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Novovic, K.; Trudic, A.; Brkic, S.; Vasiljevic, Z.; Kojic, M.; Medic, D.; Cirkovic, I.; Jovcica, B. Molecular epidemiology of colistin-resistant, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Serbia from 2013 to 2016. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Jovcic, B.; Novovic, K.; Filipic, B.; Velhner, M.; Todorovic, D.; Matovic, K.; Rasic, Z.; Nikolic, S.; Kiskarolj, F.; Kojic, M. Genomic characteristics of colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar infantis from poultry farms in the Republic of Serbia. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bedenić, B.; Vranić-Ladavac, M.; Venditti, C.; Tambić-Andrašević, A.; Barišić, N.; Gužvinec, M.; Karčić, N.; Petrosillo, N.; Ladavac, R.; di Caro, A. Emergence of colistin resistance in Enterobacter aerogenes from Croatia. J. Chemother. 2018, 30, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. D’Onofrio, V.; Conzemius, R.; Varda-Brkić, D.; Bogdan, M.; Grisold, A.; Gyssens, I.C.; Bedenić, B.; Barišić, I. Epidemiology of colistin-resistant, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii in Croatia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 81, 104263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jovcic, B.; Novovic, K.; Dekic, S.; Hrenovic, J. Colistin Resistance in Environmental Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anjum, M.F.; Duggett, N.A.; AbuOun, M.; Randall, L.; Nunez-Garcia, J.; Ellis, R.J.; Rogers, J.; Horton, R.; Brena, C.; Williamson, S.; et al. Colistin resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from a pig farm in great Britain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2306–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Gröndahl-Yli-Hannuksela, K.; Lönnqvist, E.; Kallonen, T.; Lindholm, L.; Jalava, J.; Rantakokko-Jalava, K.; Vuopio, J. The first human report of mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, in Finland. AMPIS 2018, 126, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Solheim, M.; Bohlin, J.; Ulstad, C.R.; Schau Slettemeås, J.; Naseer, U.; Dahle, U.R.; Wester, A.L. Plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant Escherichia coli detected from 2014 in Norway. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 48, 227–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kurekci, C.; Aydin, M.; Nalbantoglu, O.U.; Gundogdu, A. First report of Escherichia coli carrying the mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Turkey. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 15, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Falgenhauer, L.; Waezsad, S.E.; Yao, Y.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Käsbohrer, A.; Roesler, U.; Brenner, G.M.; Schwarz, S.; Werner, G.; Kreienbrock, L.; et al. RESET consortium, Colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in Germany. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Ewers, C.; Göttig, S.; Bülte, M.; Fiedler, S.; Tietgen, M.; Leidner, U.; Heydel, C.; Bauerfeind, R.; Semmler, T. Genome sequence of avian Escherichia coli strain IHIT25637, an extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli strain of ST131 encoding colistin resistance determinant MCR-1. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00863-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Yiyun, L.; Jian-Hua, L. Monitoring Colistin Resistance in Food Animals, An Urgent Threat. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 443–446. [Google Scholar]
  30. ECDC/EFSA/EMA (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, European Food Safety Authority, European Medicines Agency). ECDC/EFSA/EMA Second Joint Report on the Integrated Analysis of the Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Humans and Food-Producing Animals. 2017. Available online: www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Report/2017/07/WC500232336.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  31. Hasman, H.; Hammerum, A.M.; Hansen, F.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Olesen, B.; Agersø, Y.; Zankari, E.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Stegger, M.; Kaas, R.S.; et al. Detection of mcr-1 encoding plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from human bloodstream infection and imported chicken meat, Denmark 2015. Eur. Surveill. 2015, 20. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kempf, I.; Jouy, E.; Chauvin, C. Colistin use and colistin resistance in bacteria from animals. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 48, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Meinersmann, R.J.; Ladely, S.R.; Plumblee, J.R.; Cook, K.L.; Thacker, E. Prevalence of mcr-1 in the cecal contents of food animals in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02244-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  34. Wang, Y.; Hou, N.; Johnston, J.; Sarreal, C.; Jarosh, J.; Hughes, A.C.; Gu, Y.; He, X. Low prevalence of mobile colistin-resistance in U.S. meat, catfish, poultry and genomic characterization of a mcr-1 positive Escherichia coli strain. Food Control. 2020, 118, 107434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Makita, K.; Goto, M.; Ozawa, M.; Kawanishi, M.; Koike, R.; Asai, T.; Tamura, Y. Multivariable Analysis of the Association Between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kusumoto, M.; Ogura, Y.; Gotoh, Y.; Iwata, T.; Hayashi, T.; Akiba, M. Colistin-resistant mcr-1-positive pathogenic Escherichia coli in swine, Japan, 2007–2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis 2016, 22, 1315–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  37. Roschanski, N.; Falgenhauer, L.; Grobbel, M.; Guenther, S.; Kreienbrock, L.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Roesler, U. Retrospective survey of mcr-1 and mcr-2 in German pig-fattening farms, 2011–2012. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 50, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Irrgang, A.; Roschanski, N.; Tenhagen, B.A.; Grobbel, M.; Skladnikiewicz-Ziemer, T.; Thomas, K.; Roesler, U.; Käsbohrer, A. Prevalence of mcr-1 in E. coli from Livestock and Food in Germany, 2010–2015. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Guenther, S.; Falgenhauer, L.; Semmler, T.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Chakraborty, T.; Roesler, U.; Roschanski, N. Environmental emission of multiresistant Escherichia coli carrying the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 from German swine farms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1289–1292. [Google Scholar] [PubMed][Green Version]
  40. Perrin-Guyomard, A.; Bruneau, M.; Houée, P.; Deleurme, K.; Legrandois, P.; Poirier, C.; Soumet, C.; Sanders, P. Prevalence of mcr-1 in commensal Escherichia coli from French livestock, 2007 to 2014. Eur. Surveill. 2016, 21, 30135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Koper, L.M.; Bode, C.; Bender, A.; Reimer, I.; Heberer, T.; Wallmann, J. Eight years of sales surveillance of antimicrobials for veterinary use in Germany—What are the perceptions? PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alba, P.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Franco, A.; Feltrin, F.; Ianzano, A.; Caprioli, A.; Stravino, F.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Bortolaia, V.; Battisti, A. Molecular epidemiology of mcr-encoded colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from food-producing animals in Italy revealed through the EU harmonized antimicrobial resistance monitoring. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ludovica, C.; Andrea, L.; Bonilauri, P.; Gherpelli, Y.; Pezzotti, G.; Pesciaroli, M.; Magistrali, C.F. Detection of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in pathogenic Escherichia coli from pigs affected by post-weaning diarrhoea in Italy. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2017, 10, 80–83. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cilia, G.; Turchi, B.; Fratini, F.; Ebani, V.V.; Turini, L.; Cerri, D.; Bertelloni, F. Phenotypic and genotypic resistance to colistin in E. coli isolated from wild boar (Sus scrofa) hunted in Italy. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2021, 67, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Misic, D.; Asanin, J.; Spergser, J.; Szostak, M.; Loncaric, I. OXA-72-Mediated Carbapenem Resistance in Sequence Type 1 Multidrug (Colistin)-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Associated with Urinary Tract Infection in a Dog from Serbia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00219-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  46. Agencija za lekove i medicinska sredstva Srbije, Promet i potrošnja lekova za upotrebu u veterinarskoj medicini. Available online: https://www.alims.gov.rs/ciril/o-agenciji/publikacije/ (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  47. Matamoros, S.; van Hattem, J.M.; Arcilla, M.S.; Willemse, N.; Melles, D.C.; Penders, J.; Vinh, T.N.; Hoa, N.T.; Bootsma, M.C.J.; van Genderen, P.J.; et al. Global phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli and plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene indicates bacterial diversity but plasmid restriction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  48. El Garch, F.; Sauget, M.; Hocquet, D.; LeChaudee, D.; Woehrle, F.; Bertrand, X. mcr-1 is borne by highly diverse Escherichia coli isolates since 2004 in food-producing animals in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, e1–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  49. Zhemin, Z.; Nabil-Fareed, A.; Khaled, M.; Yulei, F.; The Agama Study Group; Achtman, M. The EnteroBase User’s Guide, with Case Studies on Salmonella Transmissions, Yersinia pestis Phylogeny and Escherichia core Genomic Diversity. Genome Res. 2020, 30, 138–152. [Google Scholar]
  50. Loncaric, I.; Misic, D.; Szostak, M.P.; Künzel, F.; Schäfer-Somi, S.; Spergser, J. Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant and/or Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Enterobacterales Associated with Canine and Feline Urogenital Infections. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tanabe, R.H.S.; Vieira, M.A.; Mariano, N.A.B.; Dias, R.C.B.; da Silva, R.V.; Castro, C.M.; dos Santos, L.F.; Camargo, C.H.; Yamatogi, R.S.; Rall, V.L.M.; et al. Identification and characterization of atypical enteropathogenic and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from ground beef and poultry breast purchased in Botucatu, Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Matsushita, S.; Yamada, S.; Kudoh, Y.; Ohashi, M. Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli O29:H--isolated from travellers’ diarrheal cases. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1989, 63, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  53. L’Abée-Lund, T.M.; Jørgensen, H.J.; O’Sullivan, K.; Bohlin, J.; Ligård, G.; Granum, P.E.; Lindbäckl, T. The Highly Virulent 2006 Norwegian EHEC O103:H25 Outbreak Strain Is Related to the 2011 German O104:H4 Outbreak Strain. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Bernreiter-Hofer, T.; Schwarz, L.; Müller, E.; Cabal-Rosel, A.; Korus, M.; Misic, D.; Frankenfeld, K.; Abraham, K.; Grünzweil, O.; Weiss, A.; et al. The Pheno- and Genotypic Characterization of Porcine Escherichia coli Isolates. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Grünzweil, O.M.; Palmer, L.; Cabal, A.; Szostak, M.P.; Ruppitsch, W.; Kornschober, C.; Korus, M.; Misic, D.; Bernreiter-Hofer, T.; Korath, A.D.J.; et al. Presence of β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Salmonella Isolates in Marine Mammals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sennati, S.; Di Pilato, V.; Riccobono, E.; Di Maggio, T.; Villagran, A.L.; Pallecchi, L.; Bartoloni, A.; Rossolini, G.M.; Giani, T. Citrobacter braakii carrying plasmid borne mcr-1 colistin resistance gene from ready-to-eat food from a market in the Chaco region of Bolivia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2127–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  57. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 30th ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rebelo, A.R.; Bortolaia, V.; Kjeldgaard, J.S.; Pedersen, S.K.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Hansen, I.M.; Guerra, B.; Malorny, B.; Borowiak, M.; Hammerl, J.A.; et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Eur. Surveill. 2018, 23, 17-00672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lepuschitz, S.; Huhulescu, S.; Hyden, P.; Springer, B.; Rattei, T.; Allerberger, F.; Mach, R.L.; Ruppitsch, W. Characterization of a Community-Acquired-MRSA USA300 Isolate from a River Sample in Austria and Whole Genome Sequence Based Comparison to a Diverse Collection of USA300 Isolates. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  61. Wirth, T.; Falush, D.; Lan, R.; Colles, F.; Mensa, P.; Wieler, L.H.; Karch, H.; Reeves, P.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Ochman, H.; et al. Sex and Virulence in Escherichia coli: An Evolutionary Perspective. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  62. Clermont, O.; Dixit, O.V.A.; Vangchhia, B.; Condamine, B.; Dion, S.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Denamur, E.; Gordon, D. Characterization and Rapid Identification of Phylogroup G in Escherichia coli, a Lineage with High Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance Potential. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3107–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Beghain, J.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Le Nagard, H.; Denamur, E.; Clermont, O. ClermonTyping: An Easy-to-Use and Accurate in Silico Method for Escherichia Genus Strain Phylotyping. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Roer, L.; Johannesen, T.B.; Hansen, F.; Stegger, M.; Tchesnokova, V.; Sokurenko, E.; Garibay, N.; Allesøe, R.; Thomsen, M.C.F.; Lund, O.; et al. CHTyper, a Web Tool for Subtyping of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Based on the fumC and fimH Alleles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00063-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  65. Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.L.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.; et al. CARD 2020: Antibiotic Resistome Surveillance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D517–D525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for Predictions of Phenotypes from Genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zankari, E.; Allesøe, R.; Joensen, K.G.; Cavaco, L.M.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M. PointFinder: A Novel Web Tool for WGS-Based Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Associated with Chromosomal Point Mutations in Bacterial Pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2017, 72, 2764–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  68. Joensen, K.G.; Scheutz, F.; Lund, O.; Hasman, H.; Kaas, R.S.; Nielsen, E.M.; Aarestrup, F.M. Real-Time Whole-Genome Sequencing for Routine Typing, Surveillance, and Outbreak Detection of Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  69. Tetzschner, A.M.M.; Johnson, J.R.; Johnston, B.D.; Lund, O.; Scheutz, F. In Silico Genotyping of Escherichia coli Isolates for Extraintestinal Virulence Genes by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e01269-20. [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu, B.; Zheng, D.; Jin, Q.; Chen, L.; Yang, J. VFDB 2019: A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Joensen, K.G.; Tetzschner, A.M.M.; Iguchi, A.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Scheutz, F. Rapid and Easy In Silico Serotyping of Escherichia coli Isolates by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 2410–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  72. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; García-Fernández, A.; Larsen, M.V.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Hasman, H. In Silico Detection and Typing of Plasmids Using PlasmidFinder and Plasmid Multilocus Sequence Typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  73. Arredondo-Alonso, S.; Rogers, M.R.C.; Braat, J.C.; Verschuuren, T.D.; Top, J.; Corander, J.; Willems, R.J.L.; Schürch, A.C. Mlplasmids: A User-Friendly Tool to Predict Plasmid- and Chromosome-Derived Sequences for Single Species. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  74. Schug, A.R.; Bartel, A.; Scholtzek, A.D.; Meurer, M.; Brombach, J.; Hensel, H.; Fanning, S.; Schwarz, S.; Feßler, A.T. Biocide susceptibility testing of bacteria: Development of a broth microdilution method. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 248, 108791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 10 01063 g001 550
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree for five Serbian mcr-1-carrying E. coli and close related isolates based on the cgMLST of E. coli. Colors correspond to the sequence type. Each circle represents isolates with an allelic profile based on the sequence of 2513 core genome targets. Numbers refer to the allelic differences between two isolates. Isolates with closely related genotypes were identified with a maximum of 10 allelic differences and are shaded in grey.
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree for five Serbian mcr-1-carrying E. coli and close related isolates based on the cgMLST of E. coli. Colors correspond to the sequence type. Each circle represents isolates with an allelic profile based on the sequence of 2513 core genome targets. Numbers refer to the allelic differences between two isolates. Isolates with closely related genotypes were identified with a maximum of 10 allelic differences and are shaded in grey.
Antibiotics 10 01063 g001
Table
Table 1. Results of the molecular characterization and resistance profile of mcr-1 carrying E. coli isolates.
Table 1. Results of the molecular characterization and resistance profile of mcr-1 carrying E. coli isolates.
Isolate IDPhylogroupSerotypeCH-STCC Resistance ProfileAA-Substitution
PhenotypeGenotypeGyrAParC
15/2 16/2 51B1O8:H25CH4-32ST58CC155AMP, FQR, TET, COLblaTEM-1, strA, strB, qrnS1, tet(A), mcr-1.1Ser83Leu
52B1O29:H25CH6-53ST641CC86AMP, COLblaTEM-1, qrnS1, mcr-1.1
72/2AO8:H25CH4-24ST410CC23AMP, FQR, TET, SXT, CHL, COL, blaTEM-1, aadA1, aadA2, strA, strB, sul2, sul3, dfrA12, tet(A), tet(M), cmlA1, floR, mcr-1.1Ser83Leu, Asp87AsnSer80Ile
CH: clonotype; ST: sequence type; CC: clonal complex, AMP: ampicillin, CHL: chloramphenicol, COL: colistin, FQR: fluoroquinolone, SXT: trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, TET: tetracycline.
Table
Table 2. VAGs detected in the mcr-1.1-carrying E. coli isolates.
Table 2. VAGs detected in the mcr-1.1-carrying E. coli isolates.
Isolate ID VAG Class
AdherenceSecretion SystemIron UptakeAutotransporterTTSS EffectorsInvasionToxinAntiphagocytosisMotilityProteaseSerum Resistance
15/2, 16/2, 51cfaA, cfaB, cfaC, cfaD/cfaE, ecpA, ecpB, ecpC, ecpD, ecpE, elfA, elfC, elfD, elfG, eaeH, hcpA, hcpB, hcpC, fimA, fimC, fimD, fimE, fimF, fimG, fimH, fimIaec15, aec16, aec17, aec18, aec19, aec22, aec23, aec24, aec25, aec26, aec27/clpV, aec28, aec29, aec30, aec31, aec32sitA, sitB, sitC, sitD, iroB, iroC, iroD, iroE, iroN, fyuA, irp1, irp2, ybtA, ybtE, ybtP, ybtQ, ybtS, ybtT, ybtU, ybtXcah, ehaA, ehaB, upaG/ehaGespL1, espL4, espR1, espX1, espX4, espX5ibeB, ibeChlyE/clyAuge, wzcflaAompTrmlD
52cfaA, cfaB, cfaC, cfaD/cfaE, ecpA, ecpB, ecpC, ecpD, ecp, elfA, elfC, elfD, elfG, eaeH, hcpA, hcpB, hcpC, fimA, fimC, fimD, fimE, fimF, fimG, fimH, fimIec15, aec16, aec17, aec18, aec19, aec22, aec23, aec24, aec25, aec26, aec27/clpV, aec28, aec29, aec30, aec31, aec32sitA, sitB, sitC, sitD, iroB, iroC, iroD, iroE, iroN, fyuA, irp1, irp2. ybtA, ybtE, ybtP, ybtQ, ybtS, ybtT, ybtU, ybtXcah, ehaA, ehaB, upaG/ehaGespL1, espL4, espR1, espX1, espX4, espX5ibeB, ibeChlyE/clyAugeflaA rmlD
72/2cfaA, cfaB, cfaC, cfaD/cfaE, ecpA, ecpB, ecpC, ecpD, ecpE, elfC, elfD, elfG, eaeH, hcpA, hcpB, hcpC, fimA, fimC, fimD, fimE, fimF, fimG, fimH, mrkB, mrkDaec15, aec31, fliC agn43, upaG/ehaGespL1, espL4, espR1, espX5ibeB, ibeChlyE/clyA
Table
Table 3. Results of the biocide susceptibility testing of the five mcr-1-carrying E. coli.
Table 3. Results of the biocide susceptibility testing of the five mcr-1-carrying E. coli.
Isolate IDBiocide MIC Values [%]
Benzalkonium Chloride
(BAC)		Chlorhexidine
(CHX)		Isopropanol
(ISO)		Glutardialdehyde
(GDH)
510.0010.0000640.125
520.0010.0000360.125
15/20.0010.0000660.125
16/20.0010.0000640.125
72/20.0020.0000340.125
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mišić, D.; Kiskaroly, F.; Szostak, M.P.; Cabal, A.; Ruppitsch, W.; Bernreiter-Hofer, T.; Milovanovic, V.; Feßler, A.T.; Allerberger, F.; Spergser, J.; Müller, E.; Schwarz, S.; Braun, S.D.; Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R.; Korus, M.; Benković, D.; Korzeniowska, M.; Loncaric, I. The First Report of mcr-1-Carrying Escherichia coli Originating from Animals in Serbia. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091063

AMA Style

Mišić D, Kiskaroly F, Szostak MP, Cabal A, Ruppitsch W, Bernreiter-Hofer T, Milovanovic V, Feßler AT, Allerberger F, Spergser J, Müller E, Schwarz S, Braun SD, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Korus M, Benković D, Korzeniowska M, Loncaric I. The First Report of mcr-1-Carrying Escherichia coli Originating from Animals in Serbia. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(9):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mišić, Dušan, Ferenc Kiskaroly, Michael P. Szostak, Adriana Cabal, Werner Ruppitsch, Tanja Bernreiter-Hofer, Viktoria Milovanovic, Andrea T. Feßler, Franz Allerberger, Joachim Spergser, Elke Müller, Stefan Schwarz, Sascha D. Braun, Stefan Monecke, Ralf Ehricht, Maciej Korus, Damir Benković, Malgorzata Korzeniowska, and Igor Loncaric. 2021. "The First Report of mcr-1-Carrying Escherichia coli Originating from Animals in Serbia" Antibiotics 10, no. 9: 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop