Positive Association between the Use of Quinolones in Food Animals and the Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa: A Global Ecological Analysis
1
HIV/STI Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
2
Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
Antibiotics 2021, 10(10), 1193; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101193
Submission received: 10 September 2021
/
Revised: 28 September 2021
/
Accepted: 29 September 2021
/
Published: 1 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resistance to Antibacterials in Human Pathogens)
Abstract
:(1) Background: It is unclear what underpins the large global variations in the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. We tested the hypothesis that different intensities in the use of quinolones for food-animals play a role. (2) Methods: We used Spearman’s correlation to assess if the country-level prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in human infections with Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was correlated with the use of quinolones for food producing animals. Linear regression was used to assess the relative contributions of country-level quinolone consumption for food-animals and humans on fluoroquinolone resistance in these 4 species. (3) Results: The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in each species was positively associated with quinolone use for food-producing animals (E. coli [ρ = 0.55; p < 0.001], K. pneumoniae [ρ = 0.58; p < 0.001]; A. baumanii [ρ = 0.54; p = 0.004]; P. aeruginosa [ρ = 0.48; p = 0.008]). Linear regression revealed that both quinolone consumption in humans and food animals were independently associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli and A. baumanii. (4) Conclusions: Besides the prudent use of quinolones in humans, reducing quinolone use in food-producing animals may help retard the spread of fluoroquinolone resistance in various Gram-negative bacterial species.
1. Background
It is unclear why fluoroquinolone resistance in a range of bacterial species emerged so explosively in Asia over the past 20 years [1,2,3,4]. Between 1998 and 2009, for example, the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in Shigella increased from 0% to 29% in Asia compared to 0% to 0.6% in Europe-America [1]. Likewise, fluoroquinolone resistance has emerged rapidly in other Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp., and Klebsiella spp. [1,2,3,4,5].
The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in various species of Neisseria is particularly instructive. The prevalence of gonococcal ciprofloxacin resistance in China increased from 10% in 1996 to 95% in 2003 [6]. By way of contrast the median prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in 2009 was 24% in the Americas and 6% in Africa [7]. In a similar vein, recent studies from China have found the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance to be 100% in commensal Neisseria and 66% in N. meningitidis [8,9,10].
There is however considerable heterogeneity in the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance within Asia and beyond. The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis in Australia for example, is considerably lower than that in China [7,11,12]. Part of these differences may be explained by differences in fluoroquinolone consumption in humans [7]. Global ecological studies have however found that differences in fluoroquinolone consumption only explain a small proportion in the variation in fluoroquinolone resistance for organisms such as E. coli and N. gonorrhoeae [7,13,14]. This is also evident if we consider the examples of China and Australia where their not too dissimilar levels of consumption of fluoroquinolones appear to be an implausible explanation for the large differences in the prevalence in fluoroquinolones resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (Table 1). A more striking difference between China and Australia shown in Table 1, is the larger quantity of quinolones used for animal husbandry in China.
Quinolone use in food-producing animals has been linked to quinolone resistance in a number of Gram-negative pathogens circulating in humans [15,16]. This use of quinolones could induce resistance in bacteria circulating in humans both directly or indirectly. Direct selection would occur via human ingestion of quinolone residues in meat or water/soil contaminated by animal manure [17]. Quinolones have been found to show very low biodegradability in the environment [17,18]. Selection could also occur indirectly where quinolones select for resistance in bacteria in the food-animals and these bacteria or their resistance determinants are then transferred to humans. This indirect pathway has been shown to be important in the genesis and spread of cephalosporin resistance (mainly via the spread of plasmids) in various Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli [15].
To the best of our knowledge, only one previous ecological analyses has assessed if there is an association between fluoroquinolone use in animal husbandry and fluoroquinolone resistance in human pathogens [19]. This study was limited to European countries and found that fluoroquinolone consumption in food-producing animals was positively associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in human infections with a number of Gram-negative pathogens including Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella spp. [19,20]. Differences in fluoroquinolone use for food-producing animals are less pronounced between European countries than globally. We therefore hypothesized that differences in fluoroquinolone consumption in food-producing animals would be positively associated with a greater number of bacterial species than within Europe.
2. Methods
2.1. Data
2.1.1. Antimicrobial Resistance Data
The country-level prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance for A. baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was taken from the Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy’s (CDDEP) ResistanceMap database. CDDEP aggregates data on antibiotic resistance from several sources. The isolates tested are all invasive taken from blood/cerebrospinal fluid from humans. The data are then harmonized to present similar definitions of resistance across countries and regions to enable comparisons between countries. Further details pertaining to the methodology and definitions used to define antimicrobial resistance can be found at [21]. The list of sources used to obtain the data is provided in Table S1. CDDEP provides data on fluroquinolone resistance for 10 bacterial species but only 4 of these have data for more than 15 countries. We limited our analyses to these 4 species. For each of the species, a resistance prevalence estimate from a single year for each country was provided in the dataset. This typically applied to the year 2017.
2.1.2. Quinolone Use for Food-Animal Data
We obtained the country level consumption of quinolones for animal food production in the year 2013 from a systematic review on this topic performed by Broeckel et al. [22]. This study calculated the volume of antimicrobials (in tons) by class of antimicrobial in 38 countries in the year 2013. Four categories of animals were included: chicken, cattle, pigs and small ruminants (sheep and goats), which together account for the overwhelming majority of terrestrial animals raised for food [15,22].
We used this data to calculate the number of milligrams of quinolones used for animal food production/population correction unit (PCU—a kilogram of animal product) in the year 2013. The data for the tonnage of food animals produced per country and year in the year 2013 was taken from the Food and Agriculture Organization estimates (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/ accessed on 2 July 2021).
2.1.3. Human Fluoroquinolone Consumption Data
2.2. Statistical Analyses
For each comparison, Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the country-level association between the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in each species and (1) quinolone use for animals and (2) quinolone consumption by humans. Linear regression was used to assess the country-level association between the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in each species and the two independent variables in 3 models. In the first model, we assessed the association between fluoroquinolone resistance and fluoroquinolone consumption in humans (Model-1). In Model-2 we assessed the association between fluoroquinolone resistance and quinolone use in animals. In Model-3 we evaluated the effect of both independent variables on fluoroquinolone resistance.
2.3. Sensitivity Analysis
China had a considerably higher consumption of quinolones for food-producing animals which meant it was a clear outlier in the dataset and may have skewed the linear regression analyses (Table 1 and Figure S1). In sensitivity analyses, we therefore repeated the analyses excluding China. All statistical analyses were performed in Stata 16.0 and a p-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
3. Results
The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance varied considerably between countries (E. coli- median 31.5% [interquartile range (IQR) 22.5–47.5]; K. pneumoniae- median 44% [IQR 27–62]; A. baumannii- median 53.5% [IQR 14–82]; P. aeruginosa- median 21.5% [IQR 15–34]; Table 1). Large differences in the consumption of fluoroquinolones were also evident between countries-median 721 defined daily doses/1000 inhabitants/year (IQR 421–1129; Table 1).
Quinolone use for food-producing animals varied considerably in the 36 countries with data available (median 1.9 mg quinolones/PCU (IQR 0.7–6.6 mg/PCU; Table 1). Quinolone exposure was highest in China (261.2 mg/PCU).
3.1. Spearman’s Correlations
The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in each species was positively associated with quinolone use for food-producing animals (E. coli [ρ = 0.55; p < 0.001; n = 35], K. pneumoniae [ρ = 0.58; p < 0.001; n = 31]; A. baumannii [ρ = 0.54; p = 0.004; n = 26]; P. aeruginosa [ρ = 0.48; p = 0.008; n = 29]) and quinolone consumption in humans (E. coli [ρ = 0.58; p < 0.001; n = 47], K. pneumoniae [ρ = 0.42; p = 0.006; n = 42]; A. baumannii [ρ = 0.54; p < 0.001; n = 54]; P. aeruginosa [ρ = 0.58; p < 0.001; n = 37]; Table 2).
3.2. Linear Regression Models
For both K. pneumoniae and P. aeuginosa, only human consumption of fluoroquinolones had a statistically significant effect on the prevalence of resistance (Table 3). In the case of E. coli and A. baumannii, both consumption in humans and food animals were significantly associated with fluoroquinolone resistance (Table 2). In the case of A. baumannii, this association was statistically significant in the multivariate but not the bivariate model. For both species, the combined model (Model-3) was a better predictor of fluoroquinolone resistance than Model-2 which only considered human fluoroquinolone consumption (E. coli: R2 increased from 0.27 to 0.48; A. baumannii: R2 increased from 0.26 to 0.59; Table 2).
3.3. Sensitivity Analyses
Excluding China from the Spearman’s correlations had no effect on the results (Table S2). It did however affect the results of the linear regression analyses. The major change was that the positive association between the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli and the consumption of quinolones in food-producing animals was no longer statistically significant (Table S3).
4. Discussion
In this global ecological study Spearman’s correlation revealed that the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in all four species was positively associated with the use of quinolones for food-animals. In the case of E. coli and A. baumannii, linear regression analyses suggested that quinolone consumption in both humans and food animals plays a role in the explaining global differences in the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance. As far as K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa were concerned, this association was statistically significant in the Spearman’s correlation but not the linear regression analyses. This difference is likely influenced by one outlier in the data—China. In the dataset, China has a very high consumption of quinolones for food animals, a high prevalence of resistance for E. coli, A. baumannii and lower resistance prevalences for P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae. The results of the sensitivity analysis are compatible with this explanation.
Numerous limitations mean that due caution should be exercised in drawing conclusion from this analysis. These limitations include the relatively small number of countries with available data, the lack of longitudinal data on quinolone consumption in animals and the absence of data on quinolone use for aquaculture. National differences in the minimum time between last quinolone administration and slaughter may also influence the relationship between quinolone consumption and induction of quinolone resistance. The fluoroquinolone resistance prevalence estimates from CDDEP are based on various methodologies making cross country comparisons problematic. We did not adjust our analyses for either differences in susceptiblity testing strategies or breakpoints between countries or over time as this information is not provided by CDDEP. These limitations should however result in a misclassification bias which would typically result in a bias towards the null hypothesis [23]. The epidemiology of resistance is complex and factors other than the amount of quinolones consumed may influence the level of quinolone resistance. These include poor sanitation, inadequate processing of sewage, substandard regulation of antimicrobials, weak antimicrobial stewardship, consumption of other classes of antimicrobials, travel by humans and trade of live animals and meat, variations in environmental temperatures and high levels of institutional corruption [3,4,5,13,14,15,24]. We did not control for any of these.
Despite these limitations, various types of evidence suggest that excessive use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals could play a role in inducing antimicrobial resistance in bacteria in humans. In addition to the ecological evidence of a positive association between quinolone consumption for food animals and fluoroquinolone resistance in bacteria in humans from Europeans countries reviewed above [19], other European studies have found positive assocations between the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli in humans and E. coli from poultry and pigs [20]. A systematic review on the topic found evidence that fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin resistance could be transferred from E. coli in food-producing animals to humans [16].
As noted above, an alternative pathway for quinolones used in food-animal production to induce resistance would be via humans ingesting quinolone residues in meat or water/soil contaminated by animal manure [17]. Antimicrobial concentrations up to 230-fold lower than the minimal inhibitory concentration can induce antimicrobial resistance in bacteria such as E. coli and Salmonella enterica spp. [25,26]. Concentrations of ciprofloxacin as low as 0.1 μg/L have, for example, been shown to be able to select for resistance in certain Gram-negative bacteria [25,27]. This is termed the minimum selection concentration (MSC) [25]. Quinolone concentrations in meat, water and environmental samples exceed this threshold by some margin in a number of countries, but especially so in certain Asian countries. For example, studies have found that the mean concentration of ciprofloxacin in samples of milk, eggs, and edible fish in China to be 8.5 µg/L, 16.8 µg/kg and 331.7 µg/kg, respectively, [28,29,30]. The ingestion of these relatively high concentrations of quinolones in food products was the favoured explanation for the the high median concentration of quinolones (median 20 μg/kg), found in the colons of the general human population in 3 regions of China [31]. This concentration is 200 fold higher than the MSC for E. coli [27]. In a similar vein, a study from South Korea found that high urinary excretion of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the general population were strongly associated with consumption of beef, chicken and dairy products [32]. Finally, reducing the consumption of these foodstuffs in South Korea has been shown to result in a reduction of urinary quinolone concentrations [33]. Very low concentrations of antimicrobials such as fluoroquinolones can not only generate de novo resistance but they can also select for the enrichment of already present resistant mutants [25,27]. It is thus possible that fluoroquinolone consumption in humans plays a dominant role in the genesis of de novo resistance and that low concentrations of quinolones consumed in food may promote the spread of these resistant strains.
Ecological studies are best considered hypothesis generating. The results of this study need to be followed up by detailed individual-level, association studies. Randomized controlled trials would be particularly valuable. One study design would be to randomize groups of mice or humans to various schemas of low dose antimicrobials to assess the lowest dose of an antimicrobial that does not select for resistance in resident bacteria.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10101193/s1. SBox 1: Details for how IQVIA calculates country-level fluoroquinolone consumption estimates; Table S1: Sources used by CDDEP to provide antimicrobial resistance prevalence estimates; Table S2. Sensitivity analysis of Table 2; Table S3. Sensitivity analysis of Table 2. Spearman’s correlation matrix. Figure S1. Scatter plots of the country-level association between quinolone consumption in food-producing animals and the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in (a) E. coli, (b) K. pneumoniae, (c) A. baumanii and (d) P. aeruginosa spp.
Author Contributions
C.K. conceptualized the study. C.K. was responsible for the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. C.K. read and approved the final draft.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this work.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable. This study involved ecological level analyses of publicly available data.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data we used is publicly available from: https://resistancemap.cddep.org/AntibioticResistance.php (accessed on 2 July 2021).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank CDDEP for the data provided.
Conflicts of Interest
None to declare. All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Gu, B.; Cao, Y.; Pan, S.; Zhuang, L.; Yu, R.; Peng, Z.; Qian, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, G.; et al. Comparison of the prevalence and changing resistance to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin of Shigella between Europe–America and Asia–Africa from 1998 to 2009. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, P.-L.; Liu, Y.-C.; Toh, H.-S.; Lee, Y.-L.; Liu, Y.-M.; Ho, C.-M.; Huang, C.-C.; Liu, C.-E.; Ko, W.-C.; Wang, J.-H.; et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region: 2009–2010 results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, S37–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J. Antimicrobial resistance control in Asia. AMR Control. 2015, pp. 41–45. Available online: http://resistancecontrol.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/06_Song.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2021).
- Yam, E.L.Y.; Hsu, L.Y.; Yap, E.P.-H.; Yeo, T.W.; Lee, V.; Schlundt, J.; Lwin, M.O.; Limmathurotsakul, D.; Jit, M.; Dedon, P.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance in the Asia Pacific region: A meeting report. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chereau, F.; Opatowski, L.; Tourdjman, M.; Vong, S. Risk assessment for antibiotic resistance in South East Asia. BMJ 2017, 358, j3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bash, M.C.; McKnew, D.L.; Tapsall, J.W. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria. Antimicrob. Drug Resist. 2009, 763–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenyon, C.; Buyze, J.; Wi, T. Antimicrobial consumption and susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A global ecological analysis. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M. Meningococcal quinolone resistance originated from several commensal Neisseria spe-cies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemotherapy. 2019, 64, e01494-19. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, Y.; Chen, M. Prevalence, sequence type, and quinolone resistance of Neisseria lactamica carried in children younger than 15 years in Shanghai, China. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.; Liao, M.; Gu, W.-M.; Bell, K.; Wu, L.; Eng, N.F.; Zhang, C.-G.; Chen, Y.; Jolly, A.M.; Dillon, J.-A.R. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular determinants of quinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Shanghai. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 868–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Australian Commission on Safety Quality in Health Care. Preliminary Report on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Aus-tralia (AURA); ACSQHC: Sydney, Australia, 2014.
- Wi, T.; Lahra, M.M.; Ndowa, F.; Bala, M.; Dillon, J.-A.R.; Ramon-Pardo, P.; Eremin, S.R.; Bolan, G.; Unemo, M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Collignon, P.; Beggs, J.J.; Walsh, T.; Gandra, S.; Laxminarayan, R. Anthropological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial resistance: A univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2018, 2, e398–e405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collignon, P.; Athukorala, P.-C.; Senanayake, S.; Khan, F. Antimicrobial resistance: The major contribution of poor governance and corruption to this growing problem. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- EFS Authority. The european union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06490. [Google Scholar]
- Muloi, D.; Ward, M.J.; Pedersen, A.B.; Fevre, E.M.; Woolhouse, M.E.; van Bunnik, B.A. Are food animals responsible for transfer of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli or their resistance determinants to human populations? A systematic review. Food-Borne Pathog. Disease. 2018, 15, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ben, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, M.; Liu, L.; Wong, M.H.; Zheng, C. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ecantas, L.; Shah, S.Q.A.; Cavaco, L.M.; Emanaia, C.; Ewalsh, F.; Epopowska, M.; Egarelick, H.; Ebürgmann, H.; Esørum, H. A brief multi-disciplinary review on antimicrobial resistance in medicine and its linkage to the global environmental microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC); European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Medicines Agency (EMA). ECDC/EFSA/EMA second joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, A.R.; Collignon, P.; Aarestrup, F.M.; McEwen, S.A.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Hald, T.; Wegener, H.C. Association between antimicrobial re-sistance in Escherichia coli isolates from food animals and blood stream isolates from humans in Europe: An ecological study. Foodborne Pathog. Disease 2011, 8, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Center for Disease Dynamics Economics & Policy. ResistanceMap: Antibiotic Resistance. 2021. Available online: https://resistancemap.cddep.org/AntibioticResistance.php (accessed on 2 July 2021).
- Van Boeckel, T.P.; Glennon, E.E.; Chen, D.; Gilbert, M.; Robinson, T.P.; Grenfell, B.T.; Levin, S.A.; Bonhoeffer, S.; Laxminarayan, R. Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals. Science 2017, 357, 1350–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chyou, P.-H. Patterns of bias due to differential misclassification by case–control status in a case–control study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 22, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundborg, C.S.; Tamhankar, A.J. Antibiotic residues in the environment of South East Asia. BMJ 2017, 358, j2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gullberg, E.; Albrecht, L.M.; Karlsson, C.; Sandegren, L.; Andersson, D.I. Selection of a multidrug resistance plasmid by sublethal levels of antibiotics and heavy metals. mBio 2014, 5, e01918-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stanton, I.C.; Murray, A.K.; Zhang, L.; Snape, J.; Gaze, W.H. Evolution of antibiotic resistance at low antibiotic concentrations including selection below the minimal selective concentration. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gullberg, E.; Cao, S.; Berg, O.G.; Ilbäck, C.; Sandegren, L.; Hughes, D.; Andersson, D.I. Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.; Qiu, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, L. Antibiotic residues in poultry food in Fujian Province of China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2020, 13, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, L.; Mo, Y.; Wu, Z.; Rad, S.; Song, X.; Zeng, H.; Bashir, S.; Kang, B.; Chen, Z. Occurrence, distribution, and health risk assessment of quinolone antibiotics in water, sediment, and fish species of Qingshitan reservoir, South China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, N.; Wang, J.; Han, R.; Xu, X.; Zhen, Y.; Qu, X.; Sun, P.; Li, S.; Yu, Z. Occurrence of several main antibiotic residues in raw milk in 10 provinces of China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2013, 6, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Duan, Y.-J.; Wang, S.-P.; Wang, L.-T.; Hou, Z.-L.; Cui, Y.-X.; Hou, J.; Das, R.; Mao, D.-Q.; Luo, Y. Occurrence and distribution of clinical and veterinary antibiotics in the faeces of a Chinese population. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, K.; Kho, Y.; Park, C.; Paek, D.; Ryu, P.; Paek, D.; Kim, M.; Kim, P.; Choi, K. Influence of water and food consumption on inadvertent antibiotics intake among general population. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, K.; Kho, Y.L.; Park, Y.; Choi, K. Influence of a five-day vegetarian diet on urinary levels of antibiotics and phthalate metabo-lites: A pilot study with “Temple Stay” participants. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Country-level consumption of quinolones for food-producing animals (milligrams of quinolones used for animal food production/PCU), fluoroquinolone consumption in humans (defined daily doses[DDD]/1000 inhabitants per year) and prevalence of resistance to fluoroquinolones (%) for 4 bacterial species.
Table 1.
Country-level consumption of quinolones for food-producing animals (milligrams of quinolones used for animal food production/PCU), fluoroquinolone consumption in humans (defined daily doses[DDD]/1000 inhabitants per year) and prevalence of resistance to fluoroquinolones (%) for 4 bacterial species.
| Country | Quinolone Food Animals (mg/PCU) | Quinolones Humans (DDD/1000 inh./yr) | K. pneumoniae (%) | E. coli (%) | P. aeruginosa (%) | A. baumannii (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 648 | 51 | 34 | 25 | 83 | |
| Australia | 0 | 245 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 6 |
| Austria | 0.0706 | 699 | 16 | 22 | 12 | 9 |
| Belarus | 83 | 48 | 87 | 90 | ||
| Belgium | 0.2882 | 1246 | 27 | 25 | 12 | 14 |
| Bosnia | 56 | 40 | ||||
| Bulgaria | 0.3877 | 1178 | 68 | 43 | 32 | 96 |
| Canada | 0.0105 | 815 | 19 | 21 | 19 | |
| Chile | 577 | 29 | ||||
| China | 16.0223 | 389 | 42 | 56 | 15 | 82 |
| Croatia | 733 | 48 | 29 | 38 | 98 | |
| Cyprus | 0.1139 | 45 | 44 | 25 | 76 | |
| Czech Republic | 0.1149 | 402 | 54 | 26 | 30 | 20 |
| Denmark | 0.3004 | 292 | 14 | 1 | ||
| Ecuador | 733 | 47 | 59 | 22 | 55 | |
| Egypt | 1152 | 80 | ||||
| Estonia | 0.1554 | 376 | 30 | 20 | 13 | |
| Finland | 0.0184 | 398 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 3 |
| France | 0.1415 | 688 | 29 | 17 | 17 | 13 |
| Georgia | 68 | |||||
| Germany | 0.1414 | 701 | 18 | 23 | 16 | 9 |
| Ghana | 61 | 59 | 29 | 26 | ||
| Greece | 1242 | 69 | 34 | 38 | 96 | |
| Hungary | 0.7233 | 1130 | 42 | 31 | 23 | 67 |
| Iceland | 0.0121 | 14 | ||||
| India | 762 | 69 | 84 | 34 | 58 | |
| Ireland | 0.1945 | 433 | 19 | 26 | 16 | |
| Italy | 0.5165 | 1486 | 58 | 47 | 29 | 79 |
| Japan | 0.0518 | 954 | 30 | |||
| Kenya | 40 | 58 | ||||
| Latvia | 0.1951 | 418 | 35 | 32 | ||
| Lebanon | 45 | |||||
| Lithuania | 0.1657 | 564 | 66 | 28 | 21 | |
| Luxembourg | 0.1508 | 1064 | 29 | . | 21 | |
| Malawi | 45 | . | ||||
| Malaysia | 355 | 26 | 50 | |||
| Mexico | 434 | 28 | 62 | 23 | 95 | |
| Netherlands | 0.1671 | 374 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 3 |
| New Zealand | 0.0088 | 136 | 10 | |||
| Nigeria | 75 | 76 | ||||
| Norway | 0.1408 | 258 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
| Oman | 42 | 43 | ||||
| Pakistan | 1642 | 58 | 59 | |||
| Philippines | 262 | 32 | 39 | 18 | 40 | |
| Poland | 0.887 | 638 | 68 | 38 | 39 | 83 |
| Portugal | 0.7636 | 876 | 49 | 30 | 25 | 38 |
| Romania | 1382 | 66 | 28 | 62 | 90 | |
| Russia | 1129 | 87 | 63 | 58 | 94 | |
| Saudi Arabia | 40 | 47 | ||||
| Serbia | 1158 | 74 | 53 | |||
| Slovakia | 0.1339 | 1088 | 68 | 47 | 47 | 52 |
| Slovenia | 0.1462 | 546 | 34 | 26 | 20 | 50 |
| South Africa | 589 | 28 | 35 | 66 | ||
| South Korea | 1.0048 | 766 | 37 | |||
| Spain | 1.464 | 1180 | 24 | 33 | 24 | 73 |
| Sri Lanka | 0.1531 | 578 | 49 | 59 | 33 | |
| Sweden | 0.00418 | 354 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 0 |
| Switzerland | 0.05 | 716 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 14 |
| Tajikistan | . | 17 | ||||
| Thailand | 726 | 35 | 47 | 15 | 57 | |
| Tunisia | 851 | 57 | 19 | |||
| Turkey | 1352 | 62 | 55 | 35 | 92 | |
| UAE | 1280 | 27 | 49 | |||
| USA | 0.0538 | 1002 | 10 | 31 | 19 | 39 |
| United Kingdom | 0.038 | 251 | 12 | 18 | 10 | 17 |
| Venezuela | 1199 | 17 | 50 | 81 | ||
| Vietnam | 0.1196 | 1162 | 44 | 66 | 21 | 57 |
| Zambia | 69 | |||||
| Zimbabwe | 44 |
Table 2.
Spearman’s correlation matrix of country-level prevalence of fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance (%) in 4 bacterial species and quinolone consumption in food-producing animals (milligrams of quinolones used for animal food production/PCU) and fluoroquinolone consumption in humans (defined daily doses/1000 inhabitants per year).
Table 2.
Spearman’s correlation matrix of country-level prevalence of fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance (%) in 4 bacterial species and quinolone consumption in food-producing animals (milligrams of quinolones used for animal food production/PCU) and fluoroquinolone consumption in humans (defined daily doses/1000 inhabitants per year).
| Acinetobacter baumannii | Escherichia coli | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Food-Animal FQ Consumption | Human FQ Consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acinetobacter baumannii | 1 | |||||
| Escherichia coli | 0.66 ** | 1 | ||||
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 0.76 ** | 0.72 ** | 1 | |||
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0.72 ** | 0.61 ** | 0.90 ** | 1 | ||
| Food-animal FQ consumption | 0.54 ** | 0.55 ** | 0.46 ** | 0.58 ** | 1 | |
| Human FQ consumption | 0.54 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.42 * | 0.35 * | 1 |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.005; FQ—fluoroquinolone.
Table 3.
Linear regression models testing the country-level association between quinolone consumption in food-producing animals and humans and the prevalence fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa spp. [coefficients (95% confidence intervals)].
Table 3.
Linear regression models testing the country-level association between quinolone consumption in food-producing animals and humans and the prevalence fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa spp. [coefficients (95% confidence intervals)].
| E. coli | K. pneumoniae | A. baumannii | P. aeruginosa | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Quinolones food animals | 1.93 (0.21–3.65) * | - | 2.2 (0.84–3.56) ** | 0.84 (−1.76–3.44) | - | 1.21 (−1.25–3.68) | 3.62 (−0.39–7.64) | - | 4.6 (1.79–7.46) ** | −0.11 (−1.42–1.21) | - | 0.14 (−1.02–1.30) |
| Quinolones humans | - | 0.02 (0.01–0.03) ** | 0.02 (0.01–0.03) ** | - | 0.02 (0.01–0.04) ** | 0.02 (0.00–0.04) * | - | 0.05 (0.02–0.08) ** | 0.06 (0.03–0.08) ** | - | 0.02 (0.01–0.03) ** | 0.01 (0.01–0.02) ** |
| n | 35 | 47 | 33 | 31 | 42 | 30 | 26 | 35 | 25 | 29 | 37 | 28 |
| R2 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
* p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.005.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kenyon, C. Positive Association between the Use of Quinolones in Food Animals and the Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa: A Global Ecological Analysis. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101193
AMA Style
Kenyon C. Positive Association between the Use of Quinolones in Food Animals and the Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa: A Global Ecological Analysis. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(10):1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101193
Chicago/Turabian StyleKenyon, Chris. 2021. "Positive Association between the Use of Quinolones in Food Animals and the Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa: A Global Ecological Analysis" Antibiotics 10, no. 10: 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101193
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
