Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of Food Allergy: Nanobiosensor and Food Allergen Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
A Dual Immunological Raman-Enabled Crosschecking Test (DIRECT) for Detection of Bacteria in Low Moisture Food
Previous Article in Journal
BODIPY Dyes as Probes and Sensors to Study Amyloid-β-Related Processes
Review

Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning

Department of Biosystems Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2020, 10(12), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120193
Received: 25 September 2020 / Revised: 10 November 2020 / Accepted: 26 November 2020 / Published: 29 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors for Food and Agricultural Research)
Plant stresses have been monitored using the imaging or spectrometry of plant leaves in the visible (red-green-blue or RGB), near-infrared (NIR), infrared (IR), and ultraviolet (UV) wavebands, often augmented by fluorescence imaging or fluorescence spectrometry. Imaging at multiple specific wavelengths (multi-spectral imaging) or across a wide range of wavelengths (hyperspectral imaging) can provide exceptional information on plant stress and subsequent diseases. Digital cameras, thermal cameras, and optical filters have become available at a low cost in recent years, while hyperspectral cameras have become increasingly more compact and portable. Furthermore, smartphone cameras have dramatically improved in quality, making them a viable option for rapid, on-site stress detection. Due to these developments in imaging technology, plant stresses can be monitored more easily using handheld and field-deployable methods. Recent advances in machine learning algorithms have allowed for images and spectra to be analyzed and classified in a fully automated and reproducible manner, without the need for complicated image or spectrum analysis methods. This review will highlight recent advances in portable (including smartphone-based) detection methods for biotic and abiotic stresses, discuss data processing and machine learning techniques that can produce results for stress identification and classification, and suggest future directions towards the successful translation of these methods into practical use. View Full-Text
Keywords: abiotic stress; plant disease; fluorescence; hyperspectral imaging; thermography; RGB imaging; smartphone imaging; support vector machine (SVM); artificial neural network (ANN); machine learning abiotic stress; plant disease; fluorescence; hyperspectral imaging; thermography; RGB imaging; smartphone imaging; support vector machine (SVM); artificial neural network (ANN); machine learning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zubler, A.V.; Yoon, J.-Y. Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning. Biosensors 2020, 10, 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120193

AMA Style

Zubler AV, Yoon J-Y. Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning. Biosensors. 2020; 10(12):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zubler, Alanna V., and Jeong-Yeol Yoon. 2020. "Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning" Biosensors 10, no. 12: 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120193

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop