Next Article in Journal
Electrochemical Biosensors for Detection of MicroRNA as a Cancer Biomarker: Pros and Cons
Next Article in Special Issue
Waveguide-Based Fluorescent Immunosensor for the Simultaneous Detection of Carbofuran and 3-Hydroxy-Carbofuran
Previous Article in Journal
Drug-Based Gold Nanoparticles Overgrowth for Enhanced SPR Biosensing of Doxycycline
Previous Article in Special Issue
Overview of Recent Advances in the Design of Plasmonic Fiber-Optic Biosensors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/bios10110185
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in MXene Nanocomposite-Based Biosensors

by
Jinho Yoon
1,2,†,
Minkyu Shin
1,†,
Joungpyo Lim
1,
Ji-Young Lee
1,* and
Jeong-Woo Choi
1,*
1
Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Sogang University, 35 Baekbeom-Ro, Mapo-Gu, Seoul 04107, Korea
2
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2020, 10(11), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110185
Submission received: 28 October 2020 / Revised: 15 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published: 20 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Last Advances in Optical Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The development of advanced biosensors with high sensitivity and selectivity is one of the most demanded concerns in the field of biosensors. To meet this requirement, up until now, numerous nanomaterials have been introduced to develop biosensors for achieving high sensitivity and selectivity. Among the latest nanomaterials attracting attention, MXene is one of the best materials for the development of biosensors because of its various superior properties. MXenes are two-dimensional inorganic compounds with few atomic layers that possess excellent characteristics including high conductivity and superior fluorescent, optical, and plasmonic properties. In this review, advanced biosensors developed on the basis of the MXene nanocomposite are discussed with the selective overview of recently reported studies. For this, introduction of the MXene including the definition, synthesis methods, and its properties are discussed. Next, MXene-based electrochemical biosensors and MXene-based fluorescent/optical biosensors are provided, which are developed on the basis of the exceptional properties of the MXene nanocomposite. This review will suggest the direction for use of the Mxene nanocomposite to develop advanced biosensors with high sensitivity and selectivity.

1. Introduction

The development of biosensors to detect biological and chemical molecules that affect disease or have harmful effects is a major field of study [1,2]. The most important consideration in biosensor development is the accurate and rapid detection of target molecules to prevent the occurrence of diseases and to facilitate early medical treatment and thereby enhance the curative efficiency [3]. For this purpose, high sensitivity and selectivity are the most important characteristics to be considered in the development of biosensors. With the recent COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of biosensors in reducing the spread of diseases and facilitating treatment has become especially pertinent [4,5].
To achieve this goal, numerous nanomaterials ranging from metal nanoparticles and graphene to, more recently, transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) nanomaterials have been studied and applied for the development of biosensors [6,7]. Metal nanoparticles have been utilized mostly in the past [8,9]. However, with the discovery of carbon nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene, they have shown better performance than conventional metal nanoparticles [10,11]. Moreover, the biocompatibility makes them suitable for cellular state monitoring [12].
Nevertheless, the constant demand for nanomaterials with better performance and exceptional properties has led to the development of novel nanomaterials applicable for biosensors. Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials have attracted much interest because of their unique chemical, physical, and electrical properties [13]. In this regard, TMD nanomaterials such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and tungsten disulfide (WS2) have been extensively studied for utilization as biosensors, and are considered to be the “beyond graphene” nanomaterials [14,15,16,17].
As such, various nanomaterials have been reported and utilized for the development of incrementally efficient biosensors. Among the most recently reported nanomaterials available for biosensors, MXenes have attracted much attention for their huge potential in biosensor development because of their characteristics [18,19]. MXenes are two-dimensional inorganic compounds with a thickness of a few atomic layers and are composed of transition metal carbides, nitrides, or carbonitrides such as titanium carbide (Ti3C2) and titanium carbonitride (Ti2CN), which confers them with exceptional characteristics, including high conductivity and superior fluorescent, optical, and plasmonic properties. [20,21,22]. Just as graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) received great attention as new nanomaterials in the past, MXenes have been receiving much attention recently. MXenes represent a new novel material that has been recently used in various fields, such as catalyst generation, energy storage, and biosensors, due to their exceptional properties, including their excellent electrical conductivity, and semiconductor properties [23,24]. Moreover, the biocompatible property of MXenes enables their biomedical application [25,26,27]. Since they were first reported in 2011, MXenes have been used to develop various types of advanced biosensors, including electrochemical, fluorescent/optical, and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) biosensors, by augmenting MXene characteristics to make them suitable for specific types of biosensors or by combining them with other nanomaterials [28,29,30]. Recent studies on the development of highly effective MXene biosensors show that this novel nanomaterial is the most ideal candidate for biosensor development at present.
In this review, we discuss the advanced biosensors developed on the basis of the exceptional properties of MXene nanocomposites and provide a selective overview of recently reported studies. More specifically, this review is divided into three topics: definition and characteristics of MXene, MXene-based electrochemical biosensors, and MXene-based fluorescent/optical biosensors (Figure 1). Accordingly, this review provides the synthesis methods and characteristics of various types of MXene and their unique advantages suitable for developing specific types of biosensors clearly. In conclusion, we strongly believe that this review can clarify the current research direction and methods for utilization of MXene nanocomposites to efficiently develop efficient biosensors with high sensitivity and selectivity.

2. Definition and Characteristics of MXenes

In this section, we define MXenes, describe their unique characteristics in the context of biosensor development, and present a widely used synthesis method.

2.1. Definition of MXenes

An MXene is essentially a 2D material consisting of transition metal carbides, carbonitrides, and nitrides, with a general formula of Mn+1Xn. Here, the M represents a transition metal such as titanium, zirconium, vanadium, tantalum, chromium, or molybdenum, while X represents carbon or nitrogen. Briefly, to synthesize MXenes, the MAX phase is used as the template material. The MAX phase, which has a general formula of Mn+1AXn, has a sandwich structure with octahedral Mn+1Xn, and this structure shows strong M–X bonds and relatively weak M–A bonds. As precursors of MXenes, more than 70 different MAX phases have been identified, through which more than 20 MXenes can be synthesized [31,32]. The MXene is synthesized by removal of the A element from the MAX phase (Mn+1AXn), which is usually Al in the MAX phase, using hydrofluoric acid (HF), hydrochloric acid–lithium fluoride salts (HCl-LiF), or hydrochloric acid–sodium fluoride (HCl-NaF) [33,34]. Accordingly, the MAX phase shows a strong interaction in comparison with other 2D materials such as graphene and TMD materials, including MoS2 and WS2. Moreover, unlike M–X bonds, which contain covalent, metallic, and ionic bonds, the M–A bonds contain only metallic bonds and can be selectively removed due to differences in their bonding strengths [35,36]. For this, the MAX phase was treated with etching reagents for the selective etching of the A element. As summarized in Table 1, MXenes can be synthesized with this etching treatment. In later sub-sections, the synthesis methods and the characteristics of MXenes are discussed in detail.

2.2. Synthesis Method and Characteristics

2.2.1. HF Etching Method-Based MXenes and Characteristics

With the increasing attention on the potential applicability of MXenes, researchers have studied various synthesis methods in order to develop MXenes more efficiently and to generate MXenes with superior properties. The first synthesis method used HF as the etching reagent to develop the MXene [37]. To synthesize MXenes by using HF, researchers immersed Ti3AlC2 powder, the MAX phase precursor, into 50% HF at room temperature for 2 h. The aluminum (Al) of the Ti3AlC2 powder was selectively etched with HF treatment, after which the functional groups, including oxygen (-O), hydroxyl (-OH), or fluorine (-F), were terminated on the surface of the MXene while the Al was removed to achieve thermodynamic stability. The suspension of the reacted solution was centrifuged several times with deionized (DI) water to precipitate the powder. As shown in Figure 2a, in comparison with the structure of the Ti3AlC2 powder before the HF treatment, the MXene synthesized by the HF treatment had a multilayer structure. In addition to this study, Nb2CTx MXene nanosheets with a thickness of a few layers have been developed through control of the etching time by HF [38]. For this, the Nb2AlC powder was selected as a MAX phase precursor, and the Nb2AlC powder was immersed into 40% HF acid aqueous solution. After HF treatment, few-layer Nb2CTx (f-Nb2CTx) and accordion-type multilayer Nb2CTx (m-Nb2CTx) were fabricated by controlling the etching time. For f-Nb2CTx, the etching reaction was performed under 60 °C for 90 h, and the reacted solution was washed by centrifugation at 9000 rpm until the pH value of the supernatant became about pH 5 by changing of the solution with DI water. In addition, the supernatant was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min to obtain a pure precipitate. On the other hand, for m-Nb2CTx, all processes were performed in the same manner as for f-Nb2CTx, except that the etching time was reduced to 70 h. To confirm the electrochemical properties of the synthesized f-Nb2CTx and m-Nb2CTx, the researchers used 1 M LiPF3 mixed with ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate/ethylmethyl carbonate (EC/DEMC/EMC) as an electrolyte. The f-Nb2CTx showed a high specific capacity of 354 mAh/g at 0.05 A/g after 110 cycles, in comparison with the m-Nb2CTx. This study verified that the structure and electrochemical properties of the synthesized MXene could be controlled well by decreasing the etching time.
MXenes synthesized using HF as the etching solution show excellent electrical, mechanical, and optical properties beyond those of the other 2D nanomaterials, including TMD and graphene. In particular, the electrical properties of MXenes are affected by functionalization of the surface during the etching process of MXene synthesis, and these surface properties confer high ion transport efficiency and excellent conductivity to the synthesized MXene [42,43]. In addition, the pristine MXene (Mn+1Xn) is metallic in nature due to the transition metal M, but as the surface becomes functional, it shows semiconducting properties. Moreover, MXenes have excellent biocompatibility and toxicity that may exist can be prevented because of its easy surface functionalization [25,26,27]. These unique electrical properties and biocompatibility of MXenes indicate their huge potential for use in the development of advanced electrochemical biosensors and biomedical application [44].
Biosensors 10 00185 g002 550
Figure 2. Definition and characteristics of MXenes. (a) Schematic diagram of the synthesis process from the MAX phase to the MXene nanosheets, and SEM images of the MAX phase (Ti3AlC2) before and after hydrofluoric acid (HF) treatment (reprinted with permission from [37]; copyright (2012) American Chemical Society). (b) Crystal structure images of the MAX phase of Ti3AlC2, and the low-magnification and atomic resolution high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of Ti3C2Tx (reprinted with permission from [39]; copyright (2016) American Chemical Society). (c) Schematic image of the MXene/Au nanostructure (NS) SERS substrate fabrication process, XRD pattern, and TEM image of synthesized MXene (Ti3C2Tx), and the Raman spectra of R6G on the MXene/Au NSs SERS substrate with different concentration ranges of R6G (reprinted with permission from [45]; copyright (2019) The Royal Society of Chemistry). (d) Schematic image of the MXene-derived quantum dot (MQD) synthesis process using different solvents such as the dimethylformamide (DMF), DMSO, and ethanol (f-MQDs, s-MQDs, and e-MQDs, respectively), and the XRD pattern and FTIR spectra of the e-MQDs (black), f-MQDs (blue), and s-MQDs (red) (reprinted with permission from [41]; copyright (2018) John Wiley and Sons, Inc.).
Figure 2. Definition and characteristics of MXenes. (a) Schematic diagram of the synthesis process from the MAX phase to the MXene nanosheets, and SEM images of the MAX phase (Ti3AlC2) before and after hydrofluoric acid (HF) treatment (reprinted with permission from [37]; copyright (2012) American Chemical Society). (b) Crystal structure images of the MAX phase of Ti3AlC2, and the low-magnification and atomic resolution high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of Ti3C2Tx (reprinted with permission from [39]; copyright (2016) American Chemical Society). (c) Schematic image of the MXene/Au nanostructure (NS) SERS substrate fabrication process, XRD pattern, and TEM image of synthesized MXene (Ti3C2Tx), and the Raman spectra of R6G on the MXene/Au NSs SERS substrate with different concentration ranges of R6G (reprinted with permission from [45]; copyright (2019) The Royal Society of Chemistry). (d) Schematic image of the MXene-derived quantum dot (MQD) synthesis process using different solvents such as the dimethylformamide (DMF), DMSO, and ethanol (f-MQDs, s-MQDs, and e-MQDs, respectively), and the XRD pattern and FTIR spectra of the e-MQDs (black), f-MQDs (blue), and s-MQDs (red) (reprinted with permission from [41]; copyright (2018) John Wiley and Sons, Inc.).
Biosensors 10 00185 g002

2.2.2. In situ HF Etching Method-Based MXenes and Characteristics

Although the HF etching method is widely used for MXene synthesis, this method has some disadvantages such as the hazardous chemistry, requiring further treatment for monolayer morphology. Accordingly, other studies have suggested various approaches to compensate for the disadvantages of the HF etchant and presented synthesis methods using the HF etchants introduced thus far [18,46]. For example, one study described the development of single-layer Ti3C2Tx MXene with an atomic-scale defect structure [39]. In that study, single-layer Ti3C2Tx MXene was synthesized using the minimally intensive layer delamination (MILD) method, which eliminated the need for processes such as sonication, and large-size Ti3C2Tx MXene was synthesized using LiF in 6 M HCl. The different point defects of the synthesized Ti3C2Tx MXenes were confirmed by aberration-corrected atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Moreover, high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM imaging showed that the Ti vacancies were formed on the two-surface Ti sublayer, and that these defects were controlled by the concentration of HF used for the etching process (Figure 2b). Moreover, the conductivity of the synthesized single-layered Ti3C2Tx MXene was approximately 6.76 × 105 S/m, which was comparable to that of metallic 1T-phase MoS2 (8 × 103 S/m) or graphene (6 × 106 S/m), which have been recognized as extremely conductive nanomaterials. In another study, 2D MXene Ti3C2 was developed by using bifluoride (NaHF2, KHF2, NH4HF2) [40]. To synthesize the Ti3C2 MXene, the researchers used TiH2, Al, and TiC (ratio of 1:1.1:2) as the initial powders. Next, the mixed powders were ball-milled for 12 h and reacted with an argon atmosphere at 1400 °C for 2 h to obtain a high-purity Ti3AlC2 block. Subsequently, 1 g of the synthesized Ti3AlC2 block was immersed into 1M bifluoride solution, which was the etching solution, at 60 °C for at least 8 h. In comparison with other synthesis methods that used the complex multi-step processes, this one-step process for synthesis of Ti3C2 by using bifluoride showed large interplanar spacing.
Although the properties of MXene prepared by in situ HF etching are similar to the method synthesized using HF, this MXene has advantages compared to the MXenes prepared by HF etching method such as the prevention of toxicity in the synthesis process and the structure of synthesized MXene being a monolayer. In addition, a method of expanding the SERS characteristics of MXene synthesized using in situ HF etching has been recently studied for the development of the SERS-sensitive electrodes. For example, a novel MXene nanosheet/Au nanostructure architecture (MXene/Au NSs) with high sensitivity and stability was developed for SERS-sensitive substrate fabrication [45]. In that study, to fabricate the SERS-sensitive substrate, the researchers deposited Au nanostructures (Au NSs) by thermal evaporation on the ultrasonically cleaned glass substrate at a rate of 0.1 nm/s under 7 × 10−4 Pa, and the deposited substrate was annealed at 600 °C for 900 s. Then, the MXene nanosheet (Ti3C2Tx) was synthesized by the MILD method. The MXene/Au NS SERS substrate was fabricated by using layer-by-layer spin-coating of Ti3C2Tx at 800 rpm for 50 s on an Au NS substrate (Figure 2c). Next, Rhodamine 6G, a Raman-active probe, was employed on the MXene/Au NSs to verify the SERS-enhancing effect of the prepared substrate. The fabricated SERS-sensitive substrate showed 3.5-fold greater light average absorption, and the Raman intensity at 532-nm laser excitation showed a higher Raman signal peak in the presence of the MXene. On the basis of these characteristics, this SERS-sensitive substrate yielded a substantial enhancement factor of 2.9 × 107 at an ultra-low concentration of 10−10 M. In addition, the fabricated SERS-sensitive substrate showed the stability for Raman signal detection over 20 days. Other studies have also attempted to develop various SERS-sensitive substrates by using MXenes modified with other materials such as the Au nanorod and Au–Ag nanoshuttles for signal enhancement [30,47].

2.2.3. Synthesis of MQDs and Characteristics

In general, MXene has been synthesized as a multilayer or monolayer in the form of nanosheets, but recently, studies are being conducted to grant the superior optical property by synthesis of MXene in the form of quantum dots (QD). Moreover, similar to the other QD materials (TMD-based QDs, carbon-based QDs, and metal-based QDs), MXene-derived QDs (MQDs) exhibit superior optical properties such as strong fluorescence, high dispersibility, and biocompatibility [48]. In addition, recently, synthesis of MQDs as well as 2D nanosheet type MXene was reported by using the Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheet powder [41]. The Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheet powder was mixed with different solvents, including dimethylformamide (DMF), ethanol, or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), under flowing N2 gas for 30 min to eliminate the oxygen. In addition, the mixture was hydrothermally reacted at 120 °C for 6 h, and, subsequently, the synthesized MQDs were collected by using centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 30 min (Figure 2d). In comparison with general MXene nanosheets without fluorescence properties, the synthesized MQDs showed different photoluminescence (PL) properties at 365 nm UV irradiation depending on the used solvents. The MQDs dissolved in DMSO showed white PL emission, and the MQDs in ethanol and DMF showed blue PL emission. Using the various MXene synthesis methods described here and in further studies, we expect that MXenes with various forms and properties will be synthesized using increasingly efficient and simple processes, and that these MXenes will find use in various scientific fields, including biosensors.
As discussed in this section, MXenes can be synthesized in various types and structures by different synthetic methods, and the synthesized MXenes show superior electrochemical, fluorescent/optical, and SERS signal-enhancing properties. Thus, MXenes show a huge potential for development of highly sensitive biosensors. Accordingly, we discuss the MXene-based electrochemical and fluorescent/optical biosensors in later sections.

3. MXene-Based Electrochemical Biosensors

Among the various types of electrochemical biosensors currently in use, enzymatic electrochemical biosensors have been studied extensively because the metalloenzymes widely used as sensing probes have redox properties that are suitable for electrochemical investigations [49,50]. However, the inherent characteristics of metalloenzymes, including their low electrochemical signal generation and instability, cause limitations in achieving high sensitivity and selectivity. To solve these problems, researchers have used MXenes to develop efficient enzymatic electrochemical biosensors, as summarized in Table 2. Since MXenes show exceptional characteristics, including high conductivity and electrochemical activity and a large surface area, they are being extensively studied for their application in the development of electrochemical biosensors. Thus, MXene-based electrochemical biosensors are reported more frequently than other types of MXene-based biosensors.
Recently, an electrochemical phenol biosensor based on MXene and tyrosinase has been reported and was used as the sensing probe for phenol detection [57]. Another study reported an enzymatic beta-hydroxybutyrate biosensor based on an enzyme-decorated MXene nanosheet [58]. In these biosensors, MXene nanosheets of the Ti3C2Tx type were synthesized and used as an effective immobilization matrix for beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (beta-HBD), which was used as the sensing probe. To develop this biosensor, MXene was combined with beta-HBD by sonication for entrapping the beta-HBD. Meanwhile, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and glutaraldehyde (GA) were added to enhance beta-HBD stabilization through effective linkage. Next, a prepared composite composed of MXenes and beta-HBD was immobilized on the ruthenium hexamine-modified Au-printed circuit board electrode (AuPCB) by the drop-casting method. Ruthenium hexamine was introduced as the redox generator for demonstration of electrochemical detection of beta-hydroxybutyrate. The addition of beta-hydroxybutyrate to this biosensor allowed for controlling of the redox state of the ruthenium hexamine through the cascade reaction resulting from the interaction between beta-HBD and beta-hydroxybutyrate. The proposed biosensor detected beta-hydroxybutyrate with a high sensitivity (detection limit: 44.5 μM) and a wide linear response range (360 μM to 17.91 mM). Moreover, prepared biosensor retained its sensing property over 30 days (97.08% and 93.20% retention of its initial response after 7 and 30 days, respectively). This excellent long-term stability was derived from the layered structure of prepared MXene nanocomposite, which provided the more inner space between the BSA and the beta-HBD and provided the protective microenvironment. The results provided further evidence for the potential of MXene as an effective matrix for enzyme immobilization to construct the electrochemical biosensors.
In other studies, the Ti3C2 MXene nanosheet was synthesized by the MILD method and its surface was biofunctionalized with aminosilane to provide covalent binding sites for immobilization of a sensing probe capable of detecting the cancer biomarker (carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA) [59]. The anti-CEA bioreceptor and hexaammineruthenium ([Ru(NH3)6]3+) were used as the sensing probe and the redox probe, respectively. Through the detection of CEA by the covalently bound sensing probe on the Ti3C2 MXene nanosheet, the redox signals from the ([Ru(NH3)6]3+) decreased due to the formation of the immune complex on the Ti3C2 MXene nanosheet, which was used to evaluate the detection of the CEA. Furthermore, covalent immobilization of the sensing probe induced uniform sensing probe layer formation through efficient surface modification of the Ti3C2 MXene nanosheet, and this system finally allowed for highly sensitive detection of the target biomarker (limit of detection: 1.0 nmol/L and linear response from 0.003 μM/L to 20.0 μM/L) and long-term stability of the proposed biosensor for 7 days. Moreover, in addition to the use of MXene alone for electrochemical biosensors, hybridization of MXenes with other suitable nanomaterials has been studied to develop novel electrodes [60,61]. The three-dimensional MXene (Ti3C2Tx) and graphene hybrid film (MG hybrid film) was proposed to develop an electrochemical glucose biosensor [51]. To enhance the enzyme loading capacity and to avoid undesirable aggregation of the graphene, MXene and graphene were combined on the glassy carbon electrode to develop a three-dimensional porous film that provided effective support for enzyme immobilization (Figure 3a). By controlling the weight ratio of MXene and graphene, the researchers optimized the diameter of the pore in the MG hybrid film to facilitate enzyme loading inside the MG hybrid film. Glucose oxidase (GOx), the sensing probe for glucose, was introduced, which could react with glucose through a redox reaction. The prepared MG hybrid film showed excellent GOx-loading capacity because of its large activated surface area, abundant pores, and surface hydrophilicity. Moreover, it possessed outstanding electrical conductivity via exhibition of apparently enhanced redox peaks derived from the immobilized GOx on the MG hybrid film in comparison with other electrodes composed of only MXene or only graphene, which were used as controls. The prepared biosensor showed remarkable biosensing performance for detection of glucose diluted in real samples, with high sensitivity through the cyclic voltammetry investigation. This biosensor showed the 12.10 μA/mM sensitivity, which was more sensitive than the other types 3D porous material-based biosensors (e.g., 3D graphene film: 1.63 μA/mM), and it showed a good linear response range from 0.2 to 5.5 mM glucose. Moreover, the prepared biosensor showed the negligible decrease of the response current values over 300 scanning cycles, which was remarkably stable in comparison to the other control biosensors prepared with only MXene or only graphene. Moreover, numerous other major studies on MXene-based enzymatic electrochemical biosensors are currently underway [20].
Wearable biosensors have attracted great attention with the development of smart devices such as smart watches, and MXenes show potential for the development of wearable electrochemical biosensors [52]. Recently, a wearable electrochemical multifunctional biosensing patch system was reported on the basis of the MXene/CNT/Prussian blue composite on the flexible carbon fiber electrode to detect glucose, lactate, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) within sweat (Figure 3b). One of the most important achievements of this study was that detection of target molecules was conducted accurately by attachment of the wearable biosensor on the human body directly. As sensing probes, GOx and lactate oxidase have also been introduced. The developed wearable biosensing patch system based on the MXene/Prussian blue composite could detect various target molecules in the sweat with high sensitivity in comparison with other reported carbon nanomaterial/Prussian blue-based biosensors. This biosensor exhibited the detection limit of 0.33 µM, detection sensitivity of 35.3 µA/mMcm2, and linear response from 10 µM to 1.5 mM for glucose detection. For lactate detection, it showed a detection limit of 0.67 µM, sensitivity of 11.4 µA/mMcm2, and linear response from 0 mM to 22 mM, a range that is included in the general human lactate concentration in the sweat. In addition, this biosensor retained its detection sensitivity over 15 days. This study shows that ultrasensitive enzymatic wearable electrochemical biosensors can be developed for practical application by using MXenes.
In addition to their use in enzymatic electrochemical biosensors, MXenes have been also used to develop electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors. In general, redox-generating molecules such as methylene blue and ferrocene are utilized to develop the electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors since, unlike metalloenzymes, nucleic acids do not possess redox characteristics. However, redox signals from widely used redox generating molecules are commonly low, making them difficult to be measured easily and sensitively. To overcome this limitation and to develop optimal electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors, researchers have extensively used MXenes to confer superior conductivity and as an effective matrix for nucleic acid immobilization.
For instance, the label-free electrochemical gliotoxin biosensor was developed by using nanocomplexes composed of the tetrahedral DNA nanostructure (TDN), MXene nanosheet, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) [53]. To fabricate this biosensor, the MXene was synthesized by etching the Al layer of Ti3AlC2 using hydrogen fluoride (HF) solution, and the TDN was prepared by mixing equal quantities of the four different single-stranded DNA strands for the formation of the tetrahedral three-dimensional complex capturing probe molecule. Next, the prepared TDN was mixed with an aqueous solution of MXenes for production of the TDN/MXene complex, and the TDN/MXene complex was immobilized on the glassy carbon electrode (Figure 3c). The titanium element of the MXene nanosheet showed a strong chelation interaction with the phosphate groups of DNA. In addition, due to the tetrahedron structure of the prepared TDN, the TDN could be prevented from lying down for performing its role as the capturing probe efficiently. To investigate the gliotoxin detection performance of this biosensor, the researchers injected gliotoxin mixed with gliotoxin aptamer/signal probe into this biosensor. When gliotoxin was added to the gliotoxin aptamer/signal probe, the gliotoxin was strongly bound to the gliotoxin aptamer of the gliotoxin aptamer/signal probe. Then, the signal probe was detached from the gliotoxin aptamer and attached to the capturing probe of the TDN in the TDN/MXene complex. Finally, the gliotoxin detection performance of this biosensor could be evaluated by measurement of the signal from the signal probe bound to the TDN/MXene complex. Because of the high conductivity and flexibility of MXene nanosheets, this fabricated biosensor showed a highly sensitive limit of detection of 1.63 pg/mL and a detection range of 1.63 to 3260 pg/mL for gliotoxin by amperometric investigation, retaining its sensing property over 7 days. In addition to this study, an electrochemical multiple micro RNA (miRNA) biosensor was reported by using Au nanoparticles and MXene [62]. In this study, the MXene was used as the electrocatalyst for effective electrochemical signal enhancement, and Au nanoparticle was used to immobilize two different single-strand DNA (ssDNA) molecules modified with redox molecules (methylene blue and ferrocene), which were used as the sensing probes for multiple miRNA (miR-21 and miR-141) detection. This biosensor had a low assay time of 80 min and exhibited fourfold higher electrochemical signal than biosensors prepared without the MXene (detection sensitivity of 204 aM and 138 aM for miR-21 and miR-141 detection, respectively).
In addition to this example, a three-dimensional Au nanoparticle and MXene (Ti3C2) nanocomposite was developed for use as an electrochemical miRNA-155 biosensor [63]. The developed Au nanoparticle and MXene nanocomposite could facilitate redox signals from the methylene blue used as the redox probe in this research, thereby achieving high sensitivity (detection limit: 0.35 fM, linear response ranges from 1.0 fM to 10 nM). Moreover, MXenes have been recently combined with TMD nanomaterials, especially the MoS2, which is being studied and noted like MXenes. For example, the nanohybrid material composed of MoS2 and MXene (Ti3C2TX) was proposed to develop an electrochemical aptasensor for detection of thyroxine [64]. In this study, nanosheets of MoS2 and MXenes were hybridized on the screen-printed carbon electrode, and the three-dimensional Au nanostructures were electrochemically synthesized on the nanohybrid material layer to amplify the electrochemical signal derived from the detection of thyroxine. The thyroxine-specific RNA aptamer modified with ferrocene was employed on three-dimensional Au nanostructures synthesized on the nanohybrid material layer through Au–thiol binding. In the absence of thyroxine, the RNA aptamer existed as a folded structure, with the ferrocene located near the metallic surface. However, after addition of thyroxine, the structure of the RNA aptamer unfolded, which induced the faraway position of the ferrocene from the metallic surface and reduced the redox signal from the ferrocene. Using this sensing mechanism, a proposed biosensor based on the MoS2–MXene nanohybrid exhibited an ultralow limit of detection (0.39 pg/mL) and a wide linear response range (7.8 × 10−1 to 7.8 × 106 pg/mL) because of the employment of nanohybrid materials and three-dimensional Au nanostructure simultaneously. In another study, the other type of nanohybrid material composed of the MoS2 and MXene (Ti3C2) was synthesized to develop the ultrasensitive miRNA-182 biosensor [65]. These studies suggest a novel direction combining MXenes with other novel nanomaterials to develop ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensors. In addition to studies in which biomolecules such as enzymes and nucleic acids were introduced as sensing probes, studies on the development of electrochemical biosensors without biomolecules are also in progress, including non-enzymatic electrochemical biosensors based on MXenes [66,67].
As discussed here, MXenes have huge potential for development of various types of electrochemical biosensors, on the basis of their exceptional properties suitable for electrochemical investigation. Much research is still underway to develop new types of MXenes, which show better performance with unique structures. On the basis of these studies, MXenes are expected to be used more actively for developing electrochemical biosensors with ultrasensitivity.

4. MXene-Based Fluorescent/Optical Biosensors

As seen in Section 2, MXenes possess not only electrical or electrochemical advantages such as high electrical conductivity, electrochemical activities, and large surface area, but also strong fluorescence efficiency [29,68]. In addition, MXenes show many useful characteristics suitable for fluorescent biosensors, including chemical stability, easy surface functionalization, fluorescent MQDs with high water solubility, dispersibility, and biocompatibility due to their high hydrophilicity; thus, development of fluorescent biosensors based on MXene nanosheets has gained momentum [41,69,70]. Novel synthesis techniques for easier and more efficient synthesis of MXene nanosheets and MQDs have been developed, and effective surface modification methods have been studied to functionalize the surface of MQDs to achieve high hydrophilicity and promote their fluorescent measurement efficiency under aqueous conditions [48,71].
On the basis of these efforts, optimal fluorescent biosensors based on the MXene nanocomposite have been developed, as summarized in Table 2. In most cases, the MXene nanosheets were used as quenching molecules that could block the emitted fluorescent signals from the fluorescent sensing probes before detection of the target molecules for operation of the fluorescent biosensors. Recently, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensing systems have been developed to detect exosomes using Ti3C2 MXene nanosheets combined with the Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer [54]. The CD63 is the exosome transmembrane protein. This exosome is one of the most attractive target molecules for containing important biomolecules such as the DNA and RNA secreted from the cell, allowing its use for non-destructive cellular monitoring [72]. To develop this biosensing system, researchers bound the Cy3 labeled-CD63 aptamer, which was employed as a sensing probe capable of binding with the exosome, to the synthesized MXene nanosheets via hydrogen bonds and metal-chelate interaction of the CD63 aptamer and MXene nanosheets (Figure 4a). In the absence of the exosome, the fluorescence signal of the Cy3 was quenched by the MXene nanosheets due to the proximity between the Cy3 and the MXene nanosheet. However, after addition of the exosome, the Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer was detached from the MXene nanosheets via combination with the added exosome because the binding affinity of the Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer and surface protein (CD63) of the exosome was stronger than that of the Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer and MXene nanosheets. Therefore, the quenched signal of the Cy3 was restored, which allowed fluorescent detection of the exosome. By using this fluorescence-based sensing mechanism, this FRET-based biosensing system exhibited highly sensitive exosome sensing performance in a wide range from 104 to 109 exosomes/mL, with a low detection limit of 1.4 × 103 exosomes/mL. This detection limit value was more than 1000 times lower than the value for conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods. Furthermore, the fabricated FRET-based biosensing system maintained the exosome sensing function over 9 days, and even under a wide range of pH conditions (pH 6.4–8.4), it showed a stable fluorescence signal.
In another usage case, a fluorescent DNA biosensor was developed to diagnose the human papillomavirus (HPV) using fluorescein-labeled ssDNA (FAM-ssDNA) with Ti3C2 MXene nanosheets [73]. Like the previously discussed study, the fluorescence signal from the FAM was quenched when the FAM-ssDNA was immobilized on the MXene through the π–π interaction. However, when the target DNA, which was the partial sequence of the HPV gene, was added, the FAM-ssDNA formed double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) by hybridization with the target DNA and was released from the MXene. On releasing from the MXene, the fluorescence signal of the FAM was restored, and this fluorescent intensity was measured to analyze the concentration of the added target DNA. In addition, to enhance the detection sensitivity of the proposed biosensor, the researchers introduced exonuclease III (ExoIII), which cut the mononucleotides of dsDNA with 3′-hydroxyl terminus groups. In this cutting process, FAM was cleaved from dsDNA, and dsDNA was decomposed into ssDNA without FAM and target DNA. Then, the separated target DNA from the decomposed dsDNA could bind to the unreacted FAM-ssDNA still existing on the surface of MXene nanosheets again to induce substantial amplification of the fluorescent signal. Using this fluorescent DNA-sensing process, in the absence of ExoIII, the researchers measured the target DNA related to HPV, with a linear response range of 1.0 nM to 50 nM and a detection limit of 800 pM. However, when ExoIII was introduced, the detection sensitivity increased due to the fluorescent signal amplification phenomenon mentioned above. Thus, the detection ranges in which the target DNA was detected were widened (0.5 nM to 50 nM), and the detection limit was 100 pM. Similarly, the fluorescence-quenching property of MXene nanosheets has been utilized to demonstrate a fluorescent biosensing system for detection of various important biomolecules.
In addition to fluorescent biosensors developed using MXene nanosheets as a quenching material, MQDs have been developed and studied to develop these fluorescent biosensors by using the strong fluorescent emission property of the MQDs itself. For example, the fluorescent Ti3C2 MQD-based Fe3+ biosensor was developed in one study [55]. Fe3+ plays various roles in the physiological and pathological processes in the body, and when it is deficient or excessively accumulated in the body, it causes problems such as anemia, cancer, and dysfunction of organs [74]. Therefore, measurement of the exact concentration of Fe3+ in the body is essential. To develop a fluorescent biosensor for Fe3+ detection, the exfoliation of MXene nanosheets etched by hydrofluoric acid was performed by applying ultrasonic waves to synthesize MQDs with a size of 1.75 nm (Figure 4b). The synthesized MQDs were excited at 320 nm and generated the highest fluorescence emission signal at 410 nm, also showing stability within different solutions with a pH range of 6.4 to 8.4 and under high salt concentration (0.1 M of NaCl) conditions. Furthermore, the quantum yield of the synthesized MQDs was measured to be about 7.7%. The detection of Fe3+ was based on the following mechanisms. First, in the presence of the Fe3+, the internal filtering effect (IFE) occurred because the MQDs could not receive the excitation wavelength due to the interference of the Fe3+, which can absorb light in a range from 300 nm to 400 nm, which substantially overlaps with the excitation wavelength of the MQDs. Therefore, in the presence of both MQDs and Fe3+, some of the incoming excitation wavelength was absorbed by the Fe3+, not MQDs, reducing the fluorescence signal emitted from the MQDs. Second, by using the characteristics of the MQDs to reduce the Fe3+, the surface charge of the MQDs could be shifted to positive direction through the reduction of the Fe3+ on the surface of the MQDs. In this process, some of the Fe2+ were adsorbed on the MQD surface due to electrostatic interactions, which caused the fluorescence quenching of the MQDs. Because the MQDs were quenched due to the synergistic effect of the IFE of the Fe3+ and electrostatic interactions of the Fe2+, the researchers measured the concentration of Fe3+ in seawater and serum linearly in the range from 5 μM to 1000 μM through the analysis of the quenched fluorescence signal of the MQDs in proportional to concentration of added Fe3+. The detection limit of this biosensor was 310 nM, lower than the quality standard of drinking water (0.2 mg/L), which showed its possibility for practical application as the proposed fluorescent biosensor. Moreover, several samples containing Fe3+ were analyzed in triplicate, and the value of relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated. The RSD values of 1.1% and 1.2% were obtained at 10 μM and 250 μM of Fe3+, respectively. This result indicates that the Fe3+ detection method using the fabricated Ti3C2 MQD-based Fe3+ biosensor had excellent reproducibility. Another similar example is the development of the fluorescent polylysine-coated Ti3C2 MQD (PL-MQD)-based biosensor for detection of cytochrome c (Cyt c) and trypsin [75]. Cyt c and trypsin are the important proteins in the cell death process and involve diseases such as pancreatitis, intestinal obstruction, and cystic fibrosis [76,77]. After the ultrasonic waves were applied to the MXene nanosheets for formation of the MXene nanoparticles, the PL was added and reacted with prepared MXene nanoparticles by the hydrothermal method for synthesis of the PL-MQDs. With the introduction of the PL onto the MQD surface, synthesized PL-MQDs showed a high quantum yield of about 22%. In addition, when excited by a wavelength of 330 nm, the PL-MQDs exhibited the strong fluorescent emission at 415 nm. Furthermore, synthesized PL-MQDs showed the stable fluorescence signal in a wide range from pH 1 to pH 13, and the decrease of fluorescence signal was hardly observed even over 1 month. When the Cyt c and PL-MQD existed together, the IFE effect was noted due to the broad absorbance spectrum (from 400 nm to 600 nm) of Cyt c. As a result, the fluorescence signal of the PL-MQDs decreased in proportion to the amount of the added Cyt c. The concentration of Cyt c was measured linearly from 0.2 μM to 40 μM, and the detection limit was 20.5 nM. Next, trypsin was added to a solution in which the PL-MQDs and 40 μM of Cyt c was mixed. The trypsin hydrolyzed a Cyt c into small pieces of peptide fragments by a catalytic reaction, and the fluorescence signal of the PL-MQDs gradually recovered because of the disappearance of the Cyt c. Accordingly, the fluorescence signal intensity of the PL-MQDs increased in proportion to the amount of the added trypsin. The concentration of trypsin was measured linearly in the range of 0.5 μg/mL to 80 μg/mL, and the detection limit was 0.1 μg/mL.
In addition to MXene-based fluorescent biosensors, colorimetric optical biosensors based on MXene nanocomposites have been studied extensively due to their simplicity, rapid usage, low cost, and sensitive detection by naked eyes, which make them suitable for point-of-care testing [78,79,80,81]. For development of colorimetric optical biosensors, the peroxidase-like properties of MXenes are utilized. For example, the heterostructure composed of the Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheet and the Ni, Fe layered double hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) (MXene/NiFe-LDH) was developed for colorimetric detection of glutathione (GSH) (Figure 4c) [56]. Both the MXene nanosheets and NiFe-LDH showed peroxidase-like activity. However, when the MXene nanosheets and NiFe-LDH were combined and formed the MXene/NiFe-LDH, the combination exhibited a higher catalytic property than the catalytic properties of the MXene nanosheets or NiFe-LDH alone. This result was achieved because of the increase in the surface area accessible to ions and the acceleration of the electron transfer rate by surface conjugation of the MXene nanosheets and NiFe-LDH. The concentration of GSH was measured by adding GSH to an aqueous solution containing the MXene/NiFe-LDH, 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and H2O2. The MXene/NiFe-LDH oxidized the TMB in the presence of H2O2, and the blue color of TMB was changed to the transparent color of the oxidized TMB. However, after addition of GSH, the oxidized TMB oxidized the GSH, and the TMB itself was reduced to display the blue color again. On the basis of this colorimetric change, the detection of GSH was performed through the assessment of the restored blue color intensity of the TMB (the linear response from 0.9 μM to 30 μM concentration and detection limit of 84 nM). In addition, high reliability of the MXene/NiFe-LDH-based detection method was confirmed by showing a recovery rate in the range of 92% to 107% and an RSD value of 0.93% to 2.36% with the GSH concentration of 1 μM, 10 μM, and 20 μM in human serum samples.
As discussed in this section, MXenes are widely applicable to the development of fluorescent/optical biosensors with their unique surface chemical characteristics. Although there are some limitations to be solved, such as complexity of the synthesis process and the low oxidative stability. However, since many studies are underway to control the properties of MXene accurately, it is expected that there will be more advances in development of the Mexen-based fluorescent/optical biosensors beyond these limitations in the near future.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Numerous nanomaterials have been developed, synthesized, and utilized in the field of biosensors to harness their exceptional inherent advantages for achievement of high sensitivity and selectivity. The intrinsic characteristics of nanomaterials, such as their high conductivity and plasmonic and fluorescent properties, make them suitable for the development of advanced biosensors. Among various recently reported nanomaterials, MXenes have attracted much attention because their exceptional properties make them suitable for the development of advanced biosensors. Accordingly, since they were first reported, MXenes have been extensively studied for their potential for biosensor development. Moreover, recent studies on the development of biosensors based on the MXene nanocomposite have verified that MXenes are the best candidate among various nanomaterials for the development of various types of biosensors, including electrochemical, fluorescent, and optical biosensors, and still have huge potential for the development of next-generation biosensors such as wearable biosensing systems.
Considering these points of view, we have described the exceptional properties of MXene and recently developed biosensors on the basis of the MXene nanocomposite. For this, we provided the synthesis methods and properties of MXene and its application for developing the electrochemical and fluorescent/optical biosensors. As discussed here, MXene improves the performance of biosensors and helps in the development of advanced biosensors. Nevertheless, numerous obstacles remain for commercial utilization of these MXene-based biosensors, such as the reproducibility of these biosensors and the scope for their massive production. However, continuing research for the development of new synthesis methods or the novel structures of MXenes will form the basis for commercialization of various MXene nanocomposites and development of commercially available MXene-based biosensors. Moreover, these follow-up studies are expected to suggest a more effective conjugation way between MXene and other nanomaterials, contributing to maximizing the inherent properties of novel MXene nanocomposites to be developed in the near future. In conclusion, we strongly believe that this review can provide the creative direction for efficient utilization of MXene nanocomposites to develop advanced biosensors with high sensitivity and selectivity.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. J.Y. reviewed and wrote the MXene-based electrochemical biosensors and fluorescent/optical biosensors. M.S. reviewed and wrote the definition and characteristics of the MXene. J.L. reviewed and wrote the MXene-based fluorescent/optical biosensors. J.Y. and M.S. prepared the figure/table configuration and literature research. J.-W.C. and J.-Y.L. directed entire manuscript and contributed to this work as the corresponding author. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (no. 2019R1A2C3002300) and by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (no. 2016R1A6A1A03012845).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kirsch, J.; Siltanen, C.; Zhou, Q.; Revzin, A.; Simonian, A. Biosensor technology: Recent advances in threat agent detection and medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8733–8768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Park, Y.M.; Ahn, J.; Choi, Y.S.; Jeong, J.-M.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, J.J.; Choi, B.G.; Lee, K.G. Flexible nanopillar-based immunoelectrochemical biosensor for noninvasive detection of Amyloid beta. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Roointan, A.; Mir, T.A.; Wani, S.I.; Mati-ur-Rehman; Hussain, K.K.; Ahmed, B.; Abrahim, S.; Savardashtaki, A.; Gandomani, G.; Gandomani, M.; et al. Early detection of lung cancer biomarkers through biosensor technology: A review. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 164, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Morales-Narváez, E.; Dincer, C. The impact of biosensing in a pandemic outbreak: COVID-19. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 163, 112274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Udugama, B.; Kadhiresan, P.; Kozlowski, H.N.; Malekjahani, A.; Osborne, M.; Li, V.Y.C.; Chen, H.; Mubareka, S.; Gubbay, J.B.; Chan, W.C.W. Diagnosing COVID-19: The Disease and Tools for Detection. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 3822–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nunna, B.B.; Mandal, D.; Lee, J.U.; Singh, H.; Zhuang, S.; Misra, D.; Bhuyian, M.N.U.; Lee, E.S. Detection of cancer antigens (CA-125) using gold nano particles on interdigitated electrode-based microfuidic biosensor. Nano Converg. 2019, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Yu, D.; Zeng, C.; Miao, Z.; Dai, L. Biocompatible graphene oxide-based glucose biosensors. Langmuir 2010, 26, 6158–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohammadniaei, M.; Yoon, J.; Lee, T.; Choi, J.W. Spectroelectrochemical detection of microRNA-155 based on functional RNA immobilization onto ITO/GNP nanopattern. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 274, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elahi, N.; Kamali, M.; Baghersad, M.H.; Amini, B. A fluorescence Nano-biosensors immobilization on Iron (MNPs) and gold (AuNPs) nanoparticles for detection of Shigella spp. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Biomim. Mater. Sens. 2019, 105, 110113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hussein, M.A.; El-Said, W.A.; Abu-Zied, B.M.; Choi, J.W. Nanosheet composed of gold nanoparticle/graphene/epoxy resin based on ultrasonic fabrication for flexible dopamine biosensor using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wee, Y.; Park, S.; Kwon, Y.H.; Ju, Y.; Yeon, K.M.; Kim, J. Tyrosinase-immobilized CNT based biosensor for highly-sensitive detection of phenolic compounds. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 132, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, X.; Liu, A.; Xing, Y.; Duan, H.; Xu, W.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, B. Three-dimensional graphene biointerface with extremely high sensitivity to single cancer cell monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 105, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, H.; Cheng, H.M.; Ye, P. 2D nanomaterials: Beyond graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6009–6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Choi, W.; Choudhary, N.; Han, G.H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y.H. Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yoon, J.; Lee, T.; Bapurao, G.B.; Jo, J.; Oh, B.K.; Choi, J.-W. Electrochemical H2O2 biosensor composed of myoglobin on MoS2 nanoparticle-graphene oxide hybrid structure. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 93, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dou, X.M.; Zhao, L.; Li, X.Q.; Qin, L.X.; Han, S.; Kang, S.Z. Ag nanoparticles decorated mesh-like MoS2 hierarchical nanostructure fabricated on Ti foil: A highly sensitive SERS substrate for detection of trace malachite green in flowing water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 145331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Li, Y.Q.; Qiu, Q.; Wen, Q.R.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, W.J.; Yuwen, L.H.; Weng, L.X.; Wang, L.H. Efficient biofunctionalization of MoS2 nanosheets with peptides as intracellular fluorescent biosensor for sensitive detection of caspase-3 activity. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 2019, 543, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kalambate, P.K.; Gadhari, N.S.; Li, X.; Rao, Z.; Navale, S.T.; Shen, Y.; Patil, V.R.; Huang, Y. Recent advances in MXene–based electrochemical sensors and biosensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 120, 115643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sinha, A.; Dhanjai; Zhao, H.M.; Huang, Y.J.; Lu, X.B.; Chen, J.P.; Jain, R. MXene: An emerging material for sensing and biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, J.L.; Tong, P.; Huang, L.T.; Yu, Z.H.; Tang, D.P. Ti3C2 MXene nanosheet-based capacitance immunoassay with tyramine-enzyme repeats to detect prostate-specific antigen on interdigitated micro-comb electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 319, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.; Sun, X.; Xu, W.; Pan, G.; Zhou, D.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Bai, X.; Dong, B.; Song, H. Ratiometric photoluminescence sensing based on Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots as an intracellular pH sensor. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sarycheva, A.; Makaryan, T.; Maleski, K.; Satheeshkumar, E.; Melikyan, A.; Minassian, H.; Yoshimura, M.; Gogotsi, Y. Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide (MXene) as Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 19983–19988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meng, R.; Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Zu, L.; Peng, C.; Zheng, L.; Zheng, L.; Chen, Z.; Liu, G.; Chen, B.; et al. Black Phosphorus Quantum Dot/Ti3C2 MXene Nanosheet Composites for Efficient Electrochemical Lithium/Sodium-Ion Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Xie, X.-Y.; Li, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Q.; Fang, W.-H.; Shi, X.; Cui, G.; Sun, X. Ti3C2Tx (T = F, OH) MXene nanosheets: Conductive 2D catalysts for ambient electrohydrogenation of N2 to NH3. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 24031–24035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, H.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J. Insights into 2D MXenes for Versatile Biomedical Applications: Current Advances and Challenges Ahead. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Huang, K.; Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Han, G.; Huang, P. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 5109–5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dai, C.; Lin, H.; Xu, G.; Liu, Z.; Wu, R.; Chen, Y. Biocompatible 2D Titanium Carbide (MXenes) Composite Nanosheets for pH-Responsive MRI-Guided Tumor Hyperthermia. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 8637–8652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, L.; Lu, W.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H. MXene-Enabled Electrochemical Microfluidic Biosensor: Applications toward Multicomponent Continuous Monitoring in Whole Blood. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guan, Q.; Ma, J.; Yang, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, X.; Dong, X.; Fan, Y.; Cai, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Highly fluorescent Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots for macrophage labeling and Cu2+ ion sensing. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 14123–14133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, X.; Liu, P.; Xue, T.; Ge, Y.; Ai, S.; Sheng, Y.; Wu, R.; Xu, L.; Tang, K.; Wen, Y. A novel graphene-like titanium carbide MXene/Au–Ag nanoshuttles bifunctional nanosensor for electrochemical and SERS intelligent analysis of ultra-trace carbendazim coupled with machine learning. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jun, B.M.; Kim, S.; Heo, J.; Park, C.M.; Her, N.; Jang, M.; Huang, Y.; Han, J.; Yoon, Y. Review of MXenes as new nanomaterials for energy storage/delivery and selected environmental applications. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chaudhari, N.K.; Jin, H.; Kim, B.; Baek, D.S.; Joo, S.H.; Lee, K. MXene: An emerging two-dimensional material for future energy conversion and storage applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24564–24579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naguib, M.; Mochalin, V.N.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. 25th anniversary article: MXenes: A new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alhabeb, M.; Maleski, K.; Anasori, B.; Lelyukh, P.; Clark, L.; Sin, S.; Gogotsi, Y. Guidelines for synthesis and processing of two-dimensional titanium carbide (Ti3C2T × MXene). Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7633–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sajid, M. MXenes: Are they emerging materials for Analytical Chemistry applications?—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Srivastava, P.; Mishra, A.; Mizuseki, H.; Lee, K.R.; Singh, A.K. Mechanistic Insight into the Chemical Exfoliation and Functionalization of Ti3C2 MXene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 24256–24264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Naguib, M.; Mashtalir, O.; Carle, J.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, J.B.; Wen, J.; Bai, L.N.; Xiao, J.P.; Zheng, R.D.; Shan, X.Y.; Li, L.; Gao, H.; Zhang, X.T. One-step synthesis of few-layer niobium carbide MXene as a promising anode material for high-rate lithium ion batteries. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 14433–14439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sang, X.; Xie, Y.; Lin, M.-W.; Alhabeb, M.; Van Aken, K.L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Kent, P.R.; Xiao, K.; Unocic, R.R. Atomic Defects in Monolayer Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9193–9200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, A.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, F.; Yu, Y.; Mi, L.; Song, L. Two-dimensional MXene Ti3C2 produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Mater. Des. 2017, 114, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, G.; Niu, Y.; Yang, X.; Jin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Niu, H. Preparation of Ti3C2Tx MXene-Derived Quantum Dots with White/Blue-Emitting Photoluminescence and Electrochemiluminescence. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khazaei, M.; Arai, M.; Sasaki, T.; Chung, C.Y.; Venkataramanan, N.S.; Estili, M.; Sakka, Y.; Kawazoe, Y. Novel electronic and magnetic properties of two-dimensional transition metal carbides and nitrides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2185–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, J.; Ha, E.N.; Zhao, G.L.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, D.S.; Yue, G.Z.; Hu, L.S.; Sun, N.; Wang, Y.; Lee, L.Y.S.; et al. Recent advance in MXenes: A promising 2D material for catalysis, sensor and chemical adsorption. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 352, 306–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soomro, R.A.; Jawaid, S.; Zhu, Q.Z.; Abbas, Z.; Xu, B. A mini-review on MXenes as versatile substrate for advanced sensors. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, M.; Liu, S.; Su, D.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, G.; Qin, Y.; Li, M.Y. Controllable MXene nano-sheet/Au nanostructure architectures for the ultra-sensitive molecule Raman detection. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 22230–22236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lipatov, A.; Alhabeb, M.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Boson, A.; Gogotsi, Y.; Sinitskii, A. Effect of Synthesis on Quality, Electronic Properties and Environmental Stability of Individual Monolayer Ti3C2 MXene Flakes. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Xie, H.; Li, P.; Shao, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Chu, P.K.; Yu, X.-F. Electrostatic Self-Assembly of Ti3C2Tx MXene and Gold Nanorods as an Efficient Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Platform for Reliable and High-Sensitivity Determination of Organic Pollutants. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2303–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kong, W.H.; Niu, Y.S.; Liu, M.L.; Zhang, K.X.; Xu, G.F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.W.; Xu, Y.H.; Li, J.H. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of fluorescent MXene-like titanium Chock for carbonitride quantum dots. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2019, 105, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Feng, X.M.; Liu, Y.Y.; Kong, Q.C.; Ye, J.S.; Chen, X.H.; Hu, J.Q.; Chen, Z.W. Direct electrochemistry of myoglobin immobilized on chitosan-wrapped rod-constructed ZnO microspheres and its application to hydrogen peroxide biosensing. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2010, 14, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shumyantseva, V.V.; Bulko, T.V.; Archakov, A.I. Electrochemical reduction of cytochrome P450 as an approach to the construction of biosensors and bioreactors. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005, 99, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gu, H.; Xing, Y.; Xiong, P.; Tang, H.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Zeng, R.; Han, K.; Shi, G. Three-Dimensional Porous Ti3C2Tx MXene–Graphene Hybrid Films for Glucose Biosensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 6537–6545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lei, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Q.; He, J.H.; Baeumner, A.J.; Wolfbeis, O.S.; Wang, Z.L.; Salama, K.N.; Alshareef, H.N. A MXene-Based Wearable Biosensor System for High-Performance In Vitro Perspiration Analysis. Small 2019, 15, 1901190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, H.; Li, H.; Huang, Y.; Xiong, M.; Wang, F.; Li, C. A label-free electrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive detection of gliotoxin based on DNA nanostructure/MXene nanocomplexes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, Q.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y. Universal Ti3C2 MXenes Based Self-Standard Ratiometric Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Platform for Highly Sensitive Detection of Exosomes. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 12737–12744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y. Selective detection of Fe3+ ions based on fluorescence MXene quantum dots via a mechanism integrating electron transfer and inner filter effect. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 1826–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, H.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Sun, B. Novel Heterostructure of a MXene@NiFe-LDH Nanohybrid with Superior Peroxidase-Like Activity for Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Glutathione. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 8, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, L.X.; Lu, X.B.; Dhanjai; Wu, Z.S.; Dong, Y.F.; Wang, X.H.; Zheng, S.H.; Chen, J.P. 2D transition metal carbide MXene as a robust biosensing platform for enzyme immobilization and ultrasensitive detection of phenol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 107, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Koyappayil, A.; Chavan, S.G.; Mohammadniaei, M.; Go, A.; Hwang, S.Y.; Lee, M.-H. β-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase decorated MXene nanosheets for the amperometric determination of β-hydroxybutyrate. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ma, X.; Tu, X.L.; Gao, F.; Xie, Y.; Huang, X.G.; Fernandez, C.; Qu, F.L.; Liu, G.B.; Lu, L.M.; Yu, Y.F. Hierarchical porous MXene/amino carbon nanotubes-based molecular imprinting sensor for highly sensitive and selective sensing of fisetin. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309, 127815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.Y.; Yao, M.Y.; Dong, J.; Zhang, Q.H.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, X. Facile fabrication of flexible rGO/MXene hybrid fiber-like electrode with high volumetric capacitance. J. Power Source 2020, 448, 227398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rakhi, R.; Nayak, P.; Xia, C.; Alshareef, H.N. Novel amperometric glucose biosensor based on MXene nanocomposite. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Mohammadniaei, M.; Koyappayil, A.; Sun, Y.; Min, J.; Lee, M.H. Gold nanoparticle/MXene for multiple and sensitive detection of oncomiRs based on synergetic signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 159, 112208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yang, X.; Feng, M.; Xia, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z. An electrochemical biosensor based on AuNPs/Ti3C2 MXene three-dimensional nanocomposite for microRNA-155 detection by exonuclease III-aided cascade target recycling. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 878, 114669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kheyrabadi, L.K.; Koyappayil, A.; Kim, T.; Cheon, Y.-P.; Lee, M.-H. A MoS2@Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid-based electrochemical aptasensor (MEA) for sensitive and rapid detection of Thyroxine. Bioelectrochemistry 2021, 137, 107674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, L.; Wei, Y.; Jiao, S.; Zhu, S.; Liu, X. A novel label-free strategy for the ultrasensitive miRNA-182 detection based on MoS2/Ti3C2 nanohybrids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 137, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, M.H.; Fang, L.; Zhou, H.; Wu, F.; Lu, Y.; Luo, H.J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Hu, B.S. Three-dimensional porous MXene/NiCo-LDH composite for high performance non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 495, 143554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dang, Y.; Guan, X.; Zhou, Y.; Hao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Ma, Y.; Bai, Y.; Gong, Y.; Gao, Y. Biocompatible PB/Ti3C2 hybrid nanocomposites for the non-enzymatic electrochemical detection of H2O2 released from living cells. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 319, 128259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Feng, Y.F.; Zhou, F.R.; Deng, Q.H.; Peng, C. Solvothermal synthesis of in situ nitrogen-doped Ti3C2 MXene fluorescent quantum dots for selective Cu2+ detection. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 8320–8327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhu, X.H.; Pang, X.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Yao, S.Z. Titanium carbide MXenes combined with red-emitting carbon dots as a unique turn-on fluorescent nanosensor for label-free determination of glucose. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 7729–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Desai, M.L.; Basu, H.; Singhal, R.K.; Saha, S.; Kailasa, S.K. Ultra-small two dimensional MXene nanosheets for selective and sensitive fluorescence detection of Ag+ and Mn2+ ions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 565, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xu, Q.; Ding, L.; Wen, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhou, H.; Chen, X.; Street, J.; Zhou, A.; Ong, W.-J.; Li, N. High photoluminescence quantum yield of 18.7% by using nitrogen-doped Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 6360–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, J.H.; Choi, J.H.; Chueng, S.D.; Pongkulapa, T.; Yang, L.; Cho, H.Y.; Choi, J.W.; Lee, K.B. Nondestructive Characterization of Stem Cell Neurogenesis by a Magneto-Plasmonic Nanomaterial-Based Exosomal miRNA Detection. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 8793–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Peng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, D.; Guo, Y.; Guo, S. Ultrathin Ti3C2 nanosheets based “off-on” fluorescent nanoprobe for rapid and sensitive detection of HPV infection. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2019, 286, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, S.H.; Li, Y.C.; Cao, J.; Zhu, J.; Fan, L.Z.; Li, X.H. Sulfur-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as a Novel Fluorescent Probe for Highly Selective and Sensitive Detection of Fe3+. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 10201–10207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, M.; Zhou, J.; He, Y.; Cai, Z.; Ge, Y.; Zhou, J.; Song, G. ε-Poly-L-lysine-protected Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots with high quantum yield for fluorometric determination of cytochrome c and trypsin. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ma, L.; Liu, F.Y.; Lei, Z.; Wang, Z.X. A novel upconversion@polydopamine core@shell nanoparticle based aptameric biosensor for biosensing and imaging of cytochrome c inside living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ertürk, G.; Hedström, M.; Mattiasson, B. A sensitive and real-time assay of trypsin by using molecular imprinting-based capacitive biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, M.; He, Y.; Zhou, J.; Ge, Y.; Zhou, J.; Song, G. A “naked-eye” colorimetric and ratiometric fluorescence probe for uric acid based on Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1103, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y. 2D titanium carbide MXenes as emerging optical biosensing platforms. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 171, 112730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shao, B.; Xiao, Z. Recent achievements in exosomal biomarkers detection by nanomaterials-based optical biosensors—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1114, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Y.; Kang, Z.; Kong, L.; Shi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, M.; Yang, D.P. MXene-Ti3C2/CuS nanocomposites: Enhanced peroxidase-like activity and sensitive colorimetric cholesterol detection. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 104, 110000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biosensors 10 00185 g001 550
Figure 1. Recent advances in the development of advanced biosensors based on MXene nanocomposites.
Figure 1. Recent advances in the development of advanced biosensors based on MXene nanocomposites.
Biosensors 10 00185 g001
Biosensors 10 00185 g003 550
Figure 3. MXene-based electrochemical biosensors. (a) Construction of the MXene (Ti3C2Tx) and graphene hybrid film (MG hybrid film): the SEM and cross-sectional images of the MG hybrid film, and the calibration plot of current versus different concentrations of the glucose obtained by using the MG hybrid film-based glucose biosensor (reprinted with permission from [51]; copyright (2019) American Chemical Society). (b) Schematic image of the sensing probe electrode in the wearable biosensing system based on the MXene/Prussian blue composite, and the optical image of the wearable electrochemical multifunctional biosensing patch system connected to the portable device and human body (reprinted with permission from [52]; copyright (2019) John Wiley and Sons, Inc.). (c) Schematic diagram of the label-free electrochemical gliotoxin biosensor based on the nanocomplexes composed of the tetrahedral DNA nanostructure (TDN), MXene nanosheet, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP); its sensing mechanism; and amperometric response curves, and the analyzed logarithmic plot for the detection of gliotoxin (reprinted with permission from [53]; copyright (2019) Elsevier publishing).
Figure 3. MXene-based electrochemical biosensors. (a) Construction of the MXene (Ti3C2Tx) and graphene hybrid film (MG hybrid film): the SEM and cross-sectional images of the MG hybrid film, and the calibration plot of current versus different concentrations of the glucose obtained by using the MG hybrid film-based glucose biosensor (reprinted with permission from [51]; copyright (2019) American Chemical Society). (b) Schematic image of the sensing probe electrode in the wearable biosensing system based on the MXene/Prussian blue composite, and the optical image of the wearable electrochemical multifunctional biosensing patch system connected to the portable device and human body (reprinted with permission from [52]; copyright (2019) John Wiley and Sons, Inc.). (c) Schematic diagram of the label-free electrochemical gliotoxin biosensor based on the nanocomplexes composed of the tetrahedral DNA nanostructure (TDN), MXene nanosheet, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP); its sensing mechanism; and amperometric response curves, and the analyzed logarithmic plot for the detection of gliotoxin (reprinted with permission from [53]; copyright (2019) Elsevier publishing).
Biosensors 10 00185 g003
Biosensors 10 00185 g004 550
Figure 4. MXene-based fluorescent/optical biosensors. (a) Schematic image of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensing system based on the MXene nanosheets combined with Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer and fluorescence signal of Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer with different exosome concentrations and its linear calibration curve (reprinted with permission from [54]; copyright (2018) American Chemical Society). (b) Schematic images of the synthesis process of the MQDs and its Fe3+ detection mechanism, the fluorescence signal of the MQDs with or without 100 μM Fe3+, and the fluorescence signal of MQDs with different concentrations of Fe3+ (reprinted with permission from [55]; copyright (2020) The Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Schematic image of the MXene nanosheet and the Ni, Fe layered double hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) (MXene/NiFe-LDH)-based colorimetric biosensor for glutathione (GSH) detection and absorbance spectrum of different configurations of MXene/NiFe-LDH in tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2 with change of color and its linear calibration curve (reprinted with permission from [56]; copyright (2019) American Chemical Society).
Figure 4. MXene-based fluorescent/optical biosensors. (a) Schematic image of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensing system based on the MXene nanosheets combined with Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer and fluorescence signal of Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamer with different exosome concentrations and its linear calibration curve (reprinted with permission from [54]; copyright (2018) American Chemical Society). (b) Schematic images of the synthesis process of the MQDs and its Fe3+ detection mechanism, the fluorescence signal of the MQDs with or without 100 μM Fe3+, and the fluorescence signal of MQDs with different concentrations of Fe3+ (reprinted with permission from [55]; copyright (2020) The Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Schematic image of the MXene nanosheet and the Ni, Fe layered double hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) (MXene/NiFe-LDH)-based colorimetric biosensor for glutathione (GSH) detection and absorbance spectrum of different configurations of MXene/NiFe-LDH in tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2 with change of color and its linear calibration curve (reprinted with permission from [56]; copyright (2019) American Chemical Society).
Biosensors 10 00185 g004
Table
Table 1. Table of the studies for synthesis of MXenes using different etching solutions.
Table 1. Table of the studies for synthesis of MXenes using different etching solutions.
MAX PhasesEtching Solution and ConditionMXenesCharacteristicsReference
Ti3AlC2 powder50% HF, room temperature, 2 hTi3C2
(nanosheet) 		Excellent electrical conductivity and hydrophilic[37]
Nb2AlC powder40% HF, 60 °C, 90 hNb2CTx
(nanosheet)		Excellent electrical conductivity [38]
Ti3AlC2 powderLiF in 6 M HCl, 35 °C, 24 hTi3C2Tx
(nanosheet)		Defect structure and excellent electrical conductivity [39]
Ti3AlC2 powder1 M bifluoride (NaHF2, KHF2, NH4HF2), 60 °C, 8 hTi3C2
(nanosheet)		Large interplanar spacing [40]
Ti3AlC2 powder49% HF, toom temperature, 24 h and hydrothermal reaction with DMF, ethanol, DMSOTi3C2Tx
(quantum dot)		Excellent optical properties and biocompatibility[41]
Table
Table 2. Summary of the studies in which efficient biosensors were prepared using the MXene nanocomposite.
Table 2. Summary of the studies in which efficient biosensors were prepared using the MXene nanocomposite.
Biosensors Based on the MXene Nanocomposite
TypeCompositionSensing ProbeTargetUtilized TechniqueSensitivityStabilityReference
MXene-based electrochemical biosensorsTi3C2Tx MXene/graphene/GOx/glassy carbonGOxGlucoseCyclic voltammetryDetection sensitivity: 12.10 μA/mMNegligible current decrease over 300 scanning cycles[51]
MXene/CNT/Prussian blue/enzymes/carbon fiberGOx and lactate oxidaseGlucose and lactate in the sweatChrono
amperometry		Detection limit: 0.33 µM, detection sensitivity: 35.3 µA/mMcm2 for glucose, detection limit: 0.67 µM, detection sensitivity: 11.4 µA/mMcm2 for lactateRetention of its detection sensitivity over 15 days[52]
Ti3C2 MXene/TDN/HRP/gliotoxin aptamer/signal probe/glassy carbonGliotoxin aptamer/signal probeGlio
toxin		AmperometryLimit of detection: 1.63 pg/mL, 5 PmRetention of its current response over 7 days[53]
MXene-based fluorescent/optical biosensorsMXene nanosheets/Cy3-labeled CD63 aptamerCy3-labeled CD63 aptamerExo
some		FluorescenceDetection limit: 1.4 × 103 exosomes/mLStable signal in pH6.4–8.4 range and retention of signal over 10 days[54]
MQDs/Fe3+MQDsFe3+FluorescenceLimit of detection: 310 nMStable signal in pH 6.4–8.4 range and RSD for 10 and 250 μM of Fe3+ was 1.1% and 1.2%[55]
MXene/NiFe-LDH/ TMB/H2O2TMBGSHColorimetryDetection limit: 84 nM-[56]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, J.; Shin, M.; Lim, J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Choi, J.-W. Recent Advances in MXene Nanocomposite-Based Biosensors. Biosensors 2020, 10, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110185

AMA Style

Yoon J, Shin M, Lim J, Lee J-Y, Choi J-W. Recent Advances in MXene Nanocomposite-Based Biosensors. Biosensors. 2020; 10(11):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoon, Jinho, Minkyu Shin, Joungpyo Lim, Ji-Young Lee, and Jeong-Woo Choi. 2020. "Recent Advances in MXene Nanocomposite-Based Biosensors" Biosensors 10, no. 11: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop