Next Article in Journal
Thermally Engineered Nickel-Tungsten Oxide Films for Energy Efficient Electrochromic Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomaterials for Sustainable Green Energy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polymorph II Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for High-Efficiency COD Removal in Industrial Wastewater

by
Jemina Pomalaya-Velasco
1,
Yéssica Bendezú-Roca
1,
Yamerson Canchanya-Huaman
2 and
Juan A. Ramos-Guivar
2,*
1
Laboratorio de No Metálicos, Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú (UNCP), Av. Mariscal Ramón Castilla N° 3909, El Tambo, Huancayo 12000, Peru
2
Grupo de Investigación de Nanotecnología Aplicada para Biorremediación Ambiental, Energía, Biomedicina y Agricultura (NANOTECH), Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Av. Venezuela Cdra 34 S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Lima 15081, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(6), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060374
Submission received: 26 February 2026 / Revised: 15 March 2026 / Accepted: 17 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026

Abstract

This study reports the valorization of oil palm empty fruit bunches into cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) for the removal of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) from industrial wastewater generated by the same processing sector. Cellulose Iβ was first isolated through sequential bleaching, delignification, and mercerization, and two hydrolysis routes were evaluated to obtain CNCs: a concentrated acid route (60% v/v H2SO4, 50 °C, 60 min) for CNCs-1 and a low-acid, long-duration route (1% v/v H2SO4, 80 °C, 12 h) for CNCs-2. Rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffractograms confirmed the polymorphic transition, assigning cellulose Iβ to the intermediate materials and cellulose II to the CNC samples, with crystallite sizes of 4.99 nm for CNCs-1 and 5.43 nm for CNCs-2. Attenuated Total Reflectance–Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy analysis showed the progressive removal of lignin and hemicellulose and supported the cellulose Iβ to II transition through changes in hydroxyl bonding and crystallinity-related bands. Preliminary adsorption tests showed better COD removal with CNCs-2, which were therefore selected for optimization using a Box–Behnken design with the adsorbent mass, pH, and contact time as variables. The quadratic model was significant (R2 = 0.9675; predicted R2 = 0.8908), and the maximum COD removal reached 91.47%, decreasing the COD concentration from 2459.0 to 209.85 mg L−1 under the optimum conditions of 0.09 g CNCs-2, pH 3, and 20 min. These results highlight cellulose II nanocrystals derived from oil palm waste as a promising and scalable adsorbent for industrial wastewater treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rapid industrial and urban development has led to the discharge of large volumes of industrial wastewater, increasing water pollution. The oil-seed industry is one of the fastest-growing industrial sectors in the world. Over the last decade, the palm oil processing industry has experienced progressive growth due to high demand, reaching 78.76 million tons in 2024, with projected growth of 2.8% by 2034 [1]. This has led to increased production capacity and, consequently, the generation of considerable volumes of industrial wastewater with high concentrations of organic compounds [2]. Approximately 1.57 L of water is used to obtain 1 L of crude palm oil; on average, 75% of the water used in the extraction industry is discharged as wastewater [3]. This wastewater has a high organic load, which is reflected in the COD, a parameter used to determine the amount of organic matter susceptible to chemical oxidation present in the water [4]. The discharge of wastewater containing concentrations exceeding 1500 mg L−1 of O2 (maximum permissible limit (MPL), Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, Colombia 2015) [5] poses a threat that can lead to a decrease in dissolved oxygen (DO) in receiving water bodies, affecting the survival of aquatic organisms and disrupting the balance of ecosystems. Furthermore, the accumulation of organic matter can increase water turbidity and reduce light penetration, limiting photosynthetic processes and affecting the ecological dynamics of the aquatic system [6], representing a significant environmental risk. Therefore, there is growing interest in developing efficient and sustainable treatment strategies to reduce the organic load present in this wastewater and mitigate the impact on water resources.
Several wastewater remediation techniques using organic substances have been developed, including biological treatments [7], coagulation and flocculation [8,9], advanced oxidation [10,11], and photocatalysis [12,13]. While these methods are efficient, they have limitations, such as the generation of secondary waste, high energy consumption, and the requirement for chemical reagents and expensive equipment. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising solution for COD removal; for example, titanium oxide nanoparticles used in photocatalytic processes have reported COD removal efficiencies of between 60% and 70% [14]. Consequently, interest in developing materials from lignocellulosic waste has increased, making it an important source for producing high-value-added materials, due in part to their abundance, easy availability, and biodegradability [15]. The oilseed industry produces abundant quantities of lignocellulosic waste, which is only partially utilized, causing additional environmental impacts. However, these biodegradable wastes represent an opportunity for obtaining materials applicable in environmental remediation.
Among them, the African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), widely used for palm oil production, generates empty fruit bunches as its main byproduct, which are largely discarded or valorized as compost [16]. These oil palm empty fruit bunches, a lignocellulosic residue, typically contain approximately 32.8% cellulose, 13.74% hemicellulose, and 30.12% lignin [17]. Efficient separation of these components remains one of the main challenges for the effective utilization of this biomass.
Cellulose is the most abundant organic polymer in nature [18] and has been classified as a non-toxic and fully biodegradable material that does not generate adverse effects on the environment or humans [19]. Intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding between glucopyranose units in cellulose gives rise to four distinct crystalline forms (I–IV). Native cellulose occurs in two polymorphs, the triclinic Iα and the monoclinic Iβ, which are mainly found in bacteria and plants, respectively [20], while chemical treatments allow conversion to cellulose II, III, and IV [21]. Cellulose II, with its monoclinic crystalline structure, antiparallel lamellar packing, and higher intramolecular hydrogen bonding, exhibits improved mechanical performance, including higher fracture strain compared to cellulose I, making it more suitable for industrial applications [22]. To achieve greater removal of lignin and hemicellulose, bleaching is carried out using oxidizing agents such as sodium chlorite (NaClO2) [23]. Subsequently, alkaline treatment converts cellulose I into the cellulose II polymorph, while also promoting the residual removal of hemicellulose and lignin [24]. The removal of lignin and hemicellulose to obtain cellulose II from a lignocellulosic source can be achieved using an alkaline solution [24,25,26]. One of the most commonly used methods to induce structural changes is mercerization [27,28]. Polymorph II provides better performance than I, particularly by improving the mechanical properties and structural and thermal stability, as well as mechanical strength [29,30].
Structurally, cellulose is characterized by the coexistence of highly ordered crystalline regions and less ordered amorphous domains [31]. To obtain CNCs from purified cellulose sources, acid hydrolysis is the most widely used method. Commonly employed acids include sulfuric, phosphoric, and hydrochloric acids, as well as their mixtures [24]. Sulfuric acid is particularly attractive as it produces CNC suspensions with good stability in aqueous media due to the introduction of negatively charged sulfate groups on the surface [32,33,34]. At the nanoscale, these structures offer excellent mechanical properties and hydrophilicity, as well as affinities for different classes of pollutants [35], making them a promising alternative.
The production of CNCs from abundant empty fruit bunches offers significant potential for cost-effective and large-scale wastewater treatment. Various cellulosic sources, such as sugarcane bagasse, cotton, and rice husk [36], have been explored; however, their availability is often limited by seasonal and geographical factors. In contrast, empty fruit bunch residues generated during oil palm processing are produced daily and are readily available. Limited research has been reported on the use of biomass-derived CNCs for the removal of COD from wastewater. Among the reported materials, nanocellulose acetate, derived from dried leaves of Combretum indicum, has shown removal efficiencies of approximately 86% [4]. Similarly, nanocellulose obtained from oil palm residues has demonstrated removal efficiencies of around 70% [35], highlighting the potential of lignocellulosic materials as sustainable materials for wastewater treatment. The utilization of these residues for wastewater treatment not only contributes to efficient COD reduction but also promotes the valorization of lignocellulosic waste. However, studies employing residues generated within the same industry for the treatment of its own wastewater remain limited. Therefore, the use of lignocellulosic residues produced in the oil palm processing industry for the removal of COD from its own wastewater represents a promising and sustainable strategy, enabling the simultaneous management of industrial residues and wastewater.
In this context, the present study aimed to synthesize CNCs from empty fibers of oil palm fruit bunches—waste generated from a palm oil production plant—for their subsequent application in COD removal from wastewater generated by the same production process. CNCs were extracted from Elaeis guineensis by removing lignin and hemicellulose using NaClO2, sodium sulfite (Na2SO3), and NaOH, following the procedure of [24], with modified parameters and operating conditions. This was followed by the selective removal of the amorphous cellulose phase using two different concentrations of H2SO4. The CNCs obtained were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) to determine the polymorph type, crystallite size, and degree of crystallinity (DOC), while ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was employed to analyze intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding, differentiate cellulose I and II, and confirm the removal of lignin and hemicellulose. The resulting CNCs were used for COD removal from palm oil plant wastewater, optimizing the process through a Box–Behnken design (BBD) that controlled for the CNCs mass, treatment pH, and contact time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Reagents

Extra-pure glacial acetic acid (CH3COOH) and sodium chlorite (NaClO2, 80%) were obtained from KERM S&D (Cuarte de Huerva, Zaragoza, Spain); sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 96%), sodium hydroxide pellets (NaOH, 98%, anhydrous), and ethanol (C2H5OH) were supplied by Scharlab S.L. (Sentmenat, Barcelona, Spain); and sodium sulfite (Na2SO3, 98%) was provided by HiMedia Laboratories (Thane (West), Maharashtra, India).
The wastewater used for the COD removal experiments was collected according to Peruvian Technical Standard 214.005-2016 [37] and ISO 5667-10:2012 [38] from a palm oil production plant located in the district of Neshuya, Ucayali, Peru. Likewise, the empty palm bunches used to synthesize CNCs were collected from waste from the same oil palm production process. The process for extracting cellulose from fibers of empty oil palm fruit bunches was adapted from a previously reported method [39].

2.2. Preparation of CNCs

2.2.1. Cellulose Isolation from Empty Bunches of Oil Palm Fruit

The fiber from empty bunches of oil palm fruit (SCP) was bleached with a NaCl2O (0.7% w/v) solution in a 1:50 w/v ratio. The pH was adjusted to 5 with CH3COOH (10% v/v). Then, the material was homogenized using a magnetic stirrer at 300 rpm, increasing the temperature to 70 °C and keeping it constant for 2 h. The procedure was repeated four times until the fiber acquired a white color. The suspension was cooled to room temperature (RT) and then vacuum-filtered and washed with distilled water until pH 7 was reached. It was then dried in an oven at 40 °C for 24 h. The bleached fiber (SCB) was suspended in Na2SO3 (5% w/v) at 70 °C for 1 h, at a ratio of 1:40, and then vacuum-filtered and dried at 40 °C for 12 h. The delignified fiber (SCS) was suspended in NaOH (17.5% w/v) at 25 °C for 2 h, vacuum-filtered, and washed with distilled water and C2H5OH until pH 7 was reached. It was then dried at 40 °C for 12 h, thus obtaining cellulose (SC).

2.2.2. Synthesis of CNCs

CNCs were obtained by acid hydrolysis, following two synthesis routes.
Route 1:
CNCs-1 were obtained from cellulose by adding H2SO4 (60% v/v) dropwise under stirring at 350 rpm, in a 1:20 w/v ratio, maintaining the temperature below 30 °C for 5 min to allow complete acid transfer. The temperature was then raised to 50 °C for 60 min. The hydrolysis process was quenched by adding twice the volume of distilled water relative to the acid solution. The mixture was washed with copious amounts of distilled water until pH 4 was reached, and it was then neutralized with NaOH (0.5% w/v), added dropwise until a neutral pH was reached, with stirring for 10 min. Finally, the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 min to separate the precipitate from the liquid and subsequently sonicated for 15 min.
Route 2:
CNCs-2 were extracted from cellulose by adding H2SO4 (1% v/v) under stirring at 350 rpm in a closed beaker, in a 1:35 w/v ratio, maintaining the temperature below 80 °C for 12 h. The hydrolytic mixture was cooled to RT. Subsequently, it was washed with distilled water followed by C2H5OH. This process was repeated until the suspension reached pH 7. Finally, it was dried at 40 °C for 12 h.

2.3. Selection of CNCs for COD Removal Experiments

Preliminary experiments were conducted to select the CNCs used in the COD removal tests. In each experiment, 1.5 g of the respective material (CNCs-1 or CNCs-2) was placed in two beakers and brought into contact with 50 mL of wastewater from a tannery, which had an initial COD concentration of 876 mg L−1. The mixture was stirred at 250 rpm for 90 min at its natural pH of 7.10. The solutions were then filtered, and their final concentrations were determined. CNCs-1 exhibited a final COD concentration of 600 mg L−1, while that of CNCs-2 reached 360 mg L−1, corresponding to COD removal percentages of 31.5% and 58.9%, respectively. Therefore, CNCs-2, which exhibited the highest COD removal capacity, obtained via method 2, were selected for subsequent treatments.

2.4. Characterization

2.4.1. ATR-FTIR Experimental Conditions

ATR-FTIR spectroscopy analysis of all samples was performed with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1, in a spectral range of 4000 to 650 cm−1, using a Lyza 7000 spectrometer (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). The spectra were recorded in the 4000–650 cm−1 range because this interval includes the main diagnostic vibrations used here to assess cellulose purification and polymorphic transitions, whereas the region below 650 cm−1 did not provide additional information relevant to the present structural interpretation.

2.4.2. XRD Experimental Conditions

The XRD data were collected using a Rigaku diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan), operating with CuKα radiation (1.5406 Å) at 50 kV and 100 mA. The experimental datasets used for refinement corresponded to the measured range 2θ = 5–40° (step size: 0.02° and scan rate: 2 s/step) for cellulose Iβ and II. Rietveld refinements were performed with FullProf Suite (version January 2021) using the Thompson–Cox–Hastings (TCH) pseudo-Voigt peak-shape function with axial divergence asymmetry correction [40,41]. The crystallographic models were imported directly from the provided CIF files, where both models are monoclinic, of Laue class 2/m, with space group P21. For cellulose II [42], cell parameters were a = 8.10 Å, b = 9.03 Å, c = 10.31 Å, α = β = 90°, γ = 117.10°; for cellulose Iβ [43], a = 7.784 Å, b = 8.201 Å, c = 10.380 Å, α = β = 90°, γ = 96.55°, as an initial matching candidate. The crystallite size was calculated using the spherical harmonic approach implemented in FullProf [44].
Crystallinity analysis. The crystallinity of the extracted cellulose and prepared CNCs was analyzed by using X-ray diffractograms. The degree of crystallinity (DOC) was calculated from the integrated peak areas using Equation (1) [45]:
D O C % = A c r y s t a l l i n e A c r y s t a l l i n e + A a m o r p h o u s × 100
where Acrystalline = area of crystalline peaks and Aamorphous = area of non-crystalline peaks.
The primary objective of the characterization was to confirm the chemical purification of cellulose and the polymorphic transition to cellulose II nanocrystals. X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement provides the definitive identification of cellulose polymorphs and crystallographic parameters, while ATR-FTIR spectroscopy confirms the removal of lignin and hemicellulose and changes in hydrogen bonding. Additional techniques such as electron microscopy, BET surface area analysis, zeta potential studies, or thermal analysis, although useful in obtaining complementary information, were not essential to establish polymorphic identity or the chemical transformations addressed in this study and were therefore considered beyond its scope.

2.5. COD Removal Studies with CNCs

2.5.1. Experimental Design

Once the factors with the greatest influence on the process were selected, the BBD was used with Design-Expert v13.0 to optimize COD removal. The study variables considered were the CNCs-2 mass (g), the pH of the treatment, and the contact time (min). Each variable had three levels, low (−1), medium (0), and high (+1), according to the coded values shown in Table 1. A set of 15 experiments was designed for this purpose. The experiments were performed in duplicate, and, after the statistical analysis of the results using ANOVA, the regression coefficients of the second-order model were estimated.
Subsequently, based on the combination of the results obtained, a quadratic polynomial equation was formulated that allowed the experimental data to be precisely fitted to the optimum point [46]. The response of the experimental system is described as follows:
Y = β 0 + i = 1 k β i x i + i = 1 k β i i x i 2 + i < j k β i j x i x j +
where Y represents the removal of COD, Xi and Xj represent the coded factors of the independent variables, β0 is the response value at the central level, βi indicates the individual effect of each factor, βii the quadratic effect, βij the interaction of two factors and is the unknown error constant.
Because the COD represents the aggregate oxidizable organic content of a multicomponent wastewater, rather than a single adsorbate species, classical equilibrium isotherm models (e.g., Langmuir or Freundlich) and kinetic models developed for single-solute systems may not provide physically meaningful parameters for this system. Instead, the response surface methodology (RSM) using a Box–Behnken design was employed to evaluate the combined effects of process variables and their interactions, enabling the statistically robust optimization of COD removal under realistic treatment conditions.

2.5.2. COD Removal Process

The removal of COD from wastewater collected from a palm oil production plant was evaluated with an initial concentration of 2459.0 mg L−1. The process consisted of using CNCs-2 of 0.03, 0.09, and 0.15 g, distributed into fifteen 100 mL flasks according to a Box–Behnken experimental design. These were placed in contact with 60 mL of wastewater. The pH was then adjusted and controlled with NaOH and H2SO4 (0.05 and 0.1 M) until pH values of 3, 5, and 7 were reached, with verification performed at regular intervals. The contact time was monitored at 20, 50, and 80 min. All experiments were conducted under constant stirring at 300 rpm and at RT. Subsequently, the sample was filtered to separate the solid and liquid phases. The liquid fraction was collected for the quantification of the final COD concentration by UV–vis spectrophotometry, using the closed-reflux, colorimetric method outlined in SMEWW-APHA-AWWA-WEF Part 5220 D, 24th Ed. 2023, Chemical Oxygen Demand [47]. The COD removal percentage was determined using Equation (3):
D C O D ( % ) = C 0 , C O D C F , C O D C 0 , C O D
where DCOD (%) is the COD removal percentage, and C0,COD and CF,COD are, respectively, the initial and final COD concentrations (mg L−1 O2).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis

ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was used to identify the structural changes produced in the treatments applied for synthesis. The ATR-FTIR spectra of SCP, SCB, SCS, SC, CNCs-1, and CNCs-2 are shown in Figure 1a–d. The spectra show three main regions from 3700 to 2800 cm−1, 2800 to 1800 cm−1, and 1800 to 700 cm−1.
All spectra exhibited intense bands in the range of 3300 to 3500 cm−1 due to the stretching of the hydroxyl (-OH) group of cellulose [48,49]. The peak at 3341 cm−1, together with the weak band near 3273 cm−1, corresponds to the intramolecular O3′-H…O5′ and intermolecular O6′-H…O3′ bonds of polymorph Iβ, respectively [21,50]. After mercerization, the decrease in the intensity of these peaks and the appearance of two peaks at 3487 and 3437 cm−1 [21] evidenced the transition to cellulose polymorph II (see Figure 2). Likewise, the band at 1420 cm−1, known as the “crystallinity band”, corresponding to the flexural vibration of CH2 [51], showed a reduction in intensity, suggesting a decrease in crystallinity levels. In contrast, the increase in the band at 894 cm−1, considered as an “amorphous band” associated with the tensile vibration of C–O−C in β-(1 → 4) glycosidic bonds [25], is related to molecular reorganization in an antiparallel structure in polymorph II. These changes are significant because mercerization has been linked to the conversion of cellulose I to cellulose II [52] and to the emergence of amorphous regions with more accessible hydroxyl groups [53], while a reduction in crystalline order is associated with greater structural accessibility; both effects can facilitate interactions between the adsorbate and the surface and, therefore, contribute to the removal efficiency [54].
The transition from polymorphs I to II is also evidenced by the increase in the intensity of the band at 1366 cm−1 and the appearance of a band at 1314 cm−1 attributed to the CH2 vibrations of C2 and C6, respectively [55], confirming the structural reorganization. Changes in the peaks at 1055, 1023, and 994 cm−1 corresponding to the C–O bond in the glucopyranose ring [39,50,56] and the increase in intensity at 1159 cm−1, associated with the C-O-C stretching vibration [56], reflect the modification in the geometry of the glycosidic bond. In contrast, the band at 1200 cm−1 more clearly indicates the S=O vibration related to sulfate semi-ester groups [57].
Different characteristic peaks of lignin appear in the precursor material. The peaks at 2919 and 2850 cm−1 correspond to C–H stretching in methyl (-CH3) and methylene (-CH2) bonds [58], attributed to the aliphatic chains of suberin [59]. The peak at 1628 cm−1 is due to the C=C skeletal vibration of the benzene rings; the peak at 1616 cm−1 is due to the stretching of the C=O carboxyl groups [55,60]; that at 1507 cm−1 is due to the skeletal vibration of the C=C aromatic ring [61,62] and from the guaiacyl unit and C-H deformation in the methyl, methylene, and methoxyl groups [57]; and the peak near 1244 cm−1 is from the C-O stretching of the syringyl ring of lignin [58]. Likewise, the peaks at 1464 and 1457 cm−1 originate from the deformations of the methyl group and vibrations of the aromatic ring [55,61]. Hemicellulose groups, such as those indicated by the peaks at 1700 and 1741 cm−1, are related to C=O stretching belonging to the acetyl and uronic ester groups of hemicellulose or to carbonyl groups, including phenolic compounds such as p-coumaric acid [28,61,63]. After the pretreatments, these bands became less intense, especially after alkaline treatment, suggesting the removal of lignin and hemicellulose.
The progressive attenuation of lignin- and hemicellulose-associated bands, together with the increased prominence of cellulose-related absorptions after bleaching, delignification, and alkaline treatment, provides spectroscopic evidence of the substantial removal of non-cellulosic components. Although quantitative compositional analysis such as Klason lignin determination was not performed in this study, the chemical sequence employed is well established for the effective delignification of lignocellulosic biomass, and the ATR-FTIR/XRD results consistently support this interpretation.
The presence of cellulose is reflected at 1464 and 1457 cm−1, caused by deformations of the methyl group and vibrations of the aromatic ring [55,61]. The peak at 1636 cm−1 corresponds to the bending of H2O linked to (-OH) of cellulose, a product of deprotonation by NaOH [64]. The peak at 717 cm−1 for SCP is characteristic of CH2 rocking vibration in cellulose Iβ (monoclinic).

3.2. X-Ray Diffraction and Rietveld Analysis

Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffractograms of SCP, SCB, SCS, CNCs-1, and CNCs-2, as well as the deconvolution of SCP and CNCs-1. The precursor sample visually presents an intense and broad peak, probably centered due to the overlap of crystalline reflections with the amorphous contribution, due to the presence of hemicellulose and lignin [65]. Peak deconvolution was therefore used (see Figure 3b), revealing the characteristic reflections of monoclinic cellulose Iβ, reflected in three main peaks with Miller indices of (1-10), (110), (200) and a secondary peak (004) corresponding to 2θ = 14.8°, 16.4°, 22.3°, and 34.6° [66]. On the other hand, a low-intensity peak was seen at 2θ = 20.2° for the amorphous region [57]. The SCB and SCS samples show similar X-ray diffractograms, and more defined peaks were observed due to the removal of hemicellulose and lignin after the application of NaCl2O and Na2SO3 [22,67,68]. After alkaline treatment, the peaks shifted from 2θ = 22.3° to 21.9° (020) and from 14.8° to 12.5° (1-10), reflecting the transition from polymorphs I to II [65]. It is suggested that this is due to the amount of Na+ ions available, which allows them to penetrate the crystalline regions, modifying the intermolecular hydrogen bonds of cellulose [69] and inducing structural alterations, reflected in a lower crystallinity index (see Table 2). The cellulose II polymorph has lower crystallinity but greater thermal stability. CNCs-1 and CNCs-2 showed diffraction peaks similar to those of SC, characteristic of the cellulose II polymorph, but they were more intense owing to the elimination of amorphous cellulose during H2SO4 hydrolysis, which was consistent with the results of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy.
However, to truly confirm that these samples belonged to this polymorphic form of cellulose, Rietveld refinements were performed using the available crystallographic information. Figure 4 shows the X-ray diffractograms calculated from the crystalline models of cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. It was verified that microcrystalline cellulose crystallized under a monoclinic crystal system, so it was identified as cellulose Iβ for SCB and SCS, while, for CNCs-1 and CNCs-2, it was identified as the cellulose II polymorph, as shown in Table 3. The crystallite sizes identified for CNCs-1 (4.99 nm) and CNCs-2 (5.43 nm) were within the typical range reported for cellulose II obtained by acid hydrolysis. These crystallite dimensions are consistent with nanocrystalline cellulose domains obtained by acid hydrolysis and support the nanoscale nature of the obtained materials. Although morphological and surface analyses such as TEM, BET, or zeta potential analyses can provide complementary information, the present study was focused on crystallographic assignment, chemical purification, and process performance in COD removal. Consistently, Gong et al. [30] reported mean crystallite sizes of approximately 5.5 nm, which is close to that reported by Rana et al. [70] of 4.27–4.56 nm, ranging from ~4 to 6 nm, which are common even with variations in route/process. As Mahmud et al. [71] point out, changes in hydrolysis parameters (time, temperature) can alter the crystallinity and polymorphism of cellulose. In fact, as shown in Figure 4, variations in the H2SO4 concentration, temperature, and time resulted in slight variations in the average crystallite size for CNCs-1 and CNCs-2 [30,70,72]. Despite the close agreement of the refined unit cell parameters, confirming that both samples retained the cellulose II crystal structure, CNCs-1 and CNCs-2 differed mainly in lattice distortion, with CNCs-2 exhibiting a higher mean maximum strain. Since sulfuric acid hydrolysis preferentially attacks the amorphous regions [30], and its conditions govern the resulting CNC microstructure, the prolonged treatment used for CNCs-2 may have favored a more distorted cellulose II lattice than the shorter, more concentrated acid route used for CNCs-1 [73,74]. In contrast, the smaller SCS crystallite (3.73 nm) compared to SCB (5.03 nm) is consistent with a more aggressive pretreatment in terms of effective crystalline damage; the bleaching/delignification sequence may increase accessibility but also introduce crystalline defects and greater microstrain [44]. Specifically, the previous treatments (NaClO2/Na2SO3) preserved a crystalline fraction attributable to cellulose Iβ in SCB/SCS, while the alkaline stage with 17.5% NaOH and subsequent hydrolysis favored reorganization into antiparallel chains and I → II conversion, consistent with what has been reported for mercerization in this NaOH range [75].
In this context, the combination of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and XRD/Rietveld refinement is sufficient to support the structural assignment of cellulose II and the progressive removal of non-cellulosic components, which constituted the main characterization targets of the present work.

3.3. Box–Behnken Design

Table 4 shows the results of the experiments carried out with the BBD, as well as the percentages of COD removal (see Figure 5). After selecting the appropriate model, a statistical analysis of the data was performed to evaluate their suitability. The results of the ANOVA for the polynomial response surface model are presented in Table 5. It can be observed that the probability values (p-value) are less than 0.05, indicating the significance of the applied model [76]. In addition, the mean squares of the lack of fit, which are not significant, indicate the suitability of the second-degree model and the absence of other relationships that affect removal efficiency.
The regression coefficient (R2) of 0.9675, close to the adjusted R2, implies that the model fits well and has acceptable predictive validity (predicted R2 = 0.8908) [46]. As for the adequate precision value of 16.0964, which is higher than 4, this shows that the signal-to-noise ratio is adequate, allowing the model to be used to predict COD removal under different experimental conditions [77]. Regarding the coefficient of variation (CV%), the value obtained of 0.5442 is less than 10, indicating the accuracy of the fit. An adequate approximation of the actual relationship between the response variable and the set of independent variables was obtained.
Once the suitability of the response surface polynomial model had been validated, a multiple regression analysis was performed using the Design-Expert software v13.0 to estimate the coefficients of the regression equation. This resulted in the formulation of a second-order polynomial equation (Equation (4)).
D C O D % = 85.89 0.4037 A 1.07 B 2.09 C + 0.8525 A C + 0.9775 A 2 + 0.8825 B 2 + 1.56 C 2
where DCOD (%) represents the percentage of COD removal, while A, B, and C refer to the CNCs-2 mass, contact time, and pH, respectively. The validity of the model was also evaluated by comparing the experimental and predicted responses of the experiments (see Figure 6). The normal probability plot evidences the normality of the residuals by maintaining a linear distribution (see Figure 6b) [78]. Likewise, the plot of observed versus predicted values shows that most data points are closely aligned with the 1:1 line, indicating good correspondence between them [79]. Additionally, the random distribution of the residuals around zero as a function of the predicted COD removal percentage confirms the adequacy of the model (see Figure 6c) [46]. The obtained results corroborate the statistical validity and the adequate predictive performance of the model.
These results support the suitability of the RSM as an optimization framework for COD removal from real industrial wastewater, where the response arises from a heterogeneous mixture of organic compounds rather than from the adsorption of a single, chemically defined solute.

3.4. Effect of CNCs-2 Mass

The effect of the CNCs-2 mass on the COD removal efficiency was evaluated in the range of 0.03–0.15 g. The highest performance was observed at the limits of the evaluated range, whereas a slight increase in the COD concentration occurred at 0.09 g, which can be attributed to system saturation and suggests an approach to equilibrium conditions [80]. The increase in COD removal efficiency may be associated with the higher availability of active sites on the CNCs-2 surface, while the decrease is likely related to overlap or aggregation, resulting in an increased diffusion path length [81].
Nevertheless, the statistical analysis indicates that the linear effect of the CNCs-2 mass on COD removal is not significant within the evaluated range (p = 0.0741), suggesting that the observed variations are not solely governed by mass but rather by the combined influence of other interactions within the system. Similar results were reported by Digal et al. [4], who applied nanocellulose derived from plant biomass for COD removal from dairy wastewater and achieved removal efficiencies of between 86 and 90.8% as the mass increased from 0.5 to 3 g. Similarly, Huaman and Peña [82] developed a chitosan–cellulose nanofibril aerogel (CNF/MPCS) using 0.12 and 0.3 g of each component, respectively, and reported COD removal efficiency of 45%.

3.5. Effects of Contact Time

An evaluation of the effects of the contact time on COD removal revealed that the removal efficiency increased with the contact time, reaching 91.47% after 20 min. This behavior can be attributed to the rapid initial interaction between the CNCs-2 and the COD, driven by the high availability of active sites on the structural surfaces of the CNCs-2 during the initial stage [83].
For contact times exceeding 20 min, the COD concentration approached a plateau with only minor variation, which can be associated with the saturation of adsorption sites and the attainment of the maximum adsorption capacity [84]. Therefore, extending the contact time did not result in a substantial improvement in COD removal. This behavior was also reported by Digal et al. [4], who identified an optimal contact time of 40 min, achieving COD removal efficiencies of approximately 86–88%, and noted that certain organic contaminants require longer times to diffuse into the internal pores of CNCs-2. Likewise, Huaman and Peña [82] reported a COD reduction of 41% at a contact time of 60 min.

3.6. Effects of pH

The influence of the pH on COD removal revealed a decrease in efficiency with increasing pH, with maximum removal of 91.47% achieved at pH 3. The COD in wastewater is primarily associated with organic compounds bearing functional groups such as carboxyl (–COOH) moieties [85]. Moreover, the surfaces of CNCs-2 contain hydroxyl (–OH) and sulfate (–OSO3) groups [56].
Electrostatic interactions play a key role in the process. Abdelaziz et al. [86] reported a point of zero charge (pHpzc) of 5.4 for cellulose nanocrystal hydrogels. At pH values below those of the hydrogels, the CNCs-2 surface becomes positively charged due to the protonation of surface functional groups in the presence of excess H+ ions, leading to the formation of species such as (–OH2+) and (–OSO3H). This enhances electrostatic attraction with functional groups associated with COD. Conversely, at pH values above the pHpzc, the surface charge becomes increasingly negative, leading to reduced electrostatic attraction.
Moreover, a lower contribution from hydrogen bonding can be inferred due to the ionization of carboxylic functional groups, which typically exhibit pKa values between 3.8 and 4.4 [87,88]. At pH 3, which is lower than the pKa, carboxyl groups remain predominantly protonated (–COOH), favoring intermolecular interactions with hydroxyl (–OH) groups on the CNCs-2 surface. At higher pH values, the deprotonation of these groups modifies the interaction mechanism by enhancing electrostatic effects.
This behavior is consistent with previous studies. Digal et al. [4] reported an optimal pH of 2 for achieving approximately 86% COD removal and observed decreasing removal efficiency with increasing pH in dairy wastewater. Likewise, Zhang et al. [83] reported improved COD removal at pH 4 using electrospun chitosan–cellulose acetate fibers, attributing this behavior to the protonation state of carboxylic groups in organic matter at pH values close to their pKa.
Moreover, relatively stable behavior is observed in the pH range of 5–7, which suggests the establishment of a balance among the interactions involved under the studied conditions. Notably, considerable COD removal is also achieved at a neutral pH (wastewater pH), minimizing the need for additional chemical reagents for pH adjustment. In line with this observation, Septevani et al. [35] applied activated carbon-functionalized nanocellulose to contaminated river water, achieving a 92.5% reduction in the initial COD concentration (1304.4 mg L−1) at pH 7.5.
To evaluate the novelty of this study, the results were compared with those reported in the literature for COD removal using different adsorbents, as summarized in Table 6. The CNCs-2 developed in this work achieved high COD removal efficiency at a relatively low dosage and short contact time, demonstrating their potential for treating palm oil plant wastewater. In addition, this approach promotes the valorization of empty fruit bunch residues from the same processing plant, converting an industrial byproduct into a value-added material for wastewater treatment.

3.7. Response Surface 3D Graph and Contour Plots of Interactive Effects

Response surface plots and contour lines, based on the regression equation, allow for the optimization of process conditions and the visualization of factors affecting the system [46]. The results are shown in Figure 7. COD removal is greatest at low CNCs-2 concentrations and short contact times, with concentrations close to 87% (Figure 7a). The almost vertical orientation of the contour lines (Figure 7d–f) indicates that the contact time and pH have a greater influence than the CNCs-2 mass within the studied range. Increasing CNCs-2 does not significantly improve COD removal (Figure 7b), while a low pH and short contact time result in the maximum removal, indicated by the red region in Figure 7c. These results suggest that, once certain optimal conditions are reached, further variations in the variables do not produce significant improvements.

3.8. Possible Mechanism of Interaction

The mechanism proceeds through two main stages. In the first stage, hydrogen bond interactions dominate between hydroxyl groups on the CNCs-2 surface and oxygen-containing functional groups of the organic compounds contributing to the COD. At pH 3 (pH < pKa 3.8–4.4) [87,88], carboxylic groups remain predominantly protonated (–COOH), favoring hydrogen bond formation with surface (–OH) groups. Additionally, these hydrogen bond interactions contribute to stabilizing the overall interfacial association (see Figure 8 (2.1)). In the second stage, electrostatic interactions become predominant and are controlled by the pHpzc, which reflects the acid–base equilibrium of surface functional groups. Ibrahim et al. [95] reported a pHpzc of 6.5 for nanocellulose obtained via acid hydrolysis, whereas Abdelaziz et al. [86] reported a value of 5.4 for similarly hydrolyzed CNC. At pH 3, the condition yielding the best result is below these pHpzc values (pH < pHpzc); the elevated H+ concentration promotes the protonation of surface (–OH) and (–OSO3) groups, generating (–OH2+) and (–OSO3H) species and producing a net positive surface charge. This positively charged surface enhances electrostatic attraction with negatively charged species, particularly fatty acids present in their carboxylate form (–COO) (see Figure 8 (2.2)).

4. Conclusions

Cellulose II nanocrystals were successfully synthesized from oil palm empty fruit bunch waste through sequential bleaching, delignification, mercerization, and controlled sulfuric acid hydrolysis. X-ray diffraction combined with Rietveld refinement confirmed the complete polymorphic transition from cellulose Iβ to cellulose II, yielding CNCs with average crystallite sizes of 4.99 nm (CNCs-1) and 5.43 nm (CNCs-2). ATR-FTIR spectroscopy analysis corroborated the removal of lignin and hemicellulose and evidenced structural reorganization through characteristic hydroxyl and crystallinity-related band shifts. Among the synthesized materials, CNCs-2 exhibited superior adsorption performance and were selected for COD removal experiments. Using a Box–Behnken design, the COD removal process was statistically optimized, achieving maximum COD removal efficiency of 91.47% under optimal conditions (0.09 g, pH 3, and 20 min contact time). The quadratic response surface model demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, with R2 = 0.9675, adjusted R2 = 0.9349, and predicted R2 = 0.8908, confirming the robustness and reliability of the optimization. Process analysis revealed that the pH and contact time exerted a more significant influence on COD removal than the CNCs-2 mass within the studied range. The maximum removal was obtained under acidic conditions due to enhanced electrostatic interactions between protonated CNCs-2 surface groups (–OH2+, –OSO3H) and organic species contributing to the COD. Importantly, high COD removal efficiencies (>87%) were also achieved at a near-neutral pH, indicating the feasibility of treatment with reduced chemical adjustment. While the present work emphasizes structural confirmation and process optimization rather than exhaustive physicochemical profiling or classical single-solute adsorption modeling, the results clearly demonstrate the applicability of cellulose II nanocrystals for treating complex industrial wastewater. Overall, this study demonstrates that cellulose II nanocrystals derived from oil palm waste are a highly efficient, low-cost, and sustainable adsorbent for industrial wastewater treatment. The combination of high removal efficiency, a short contact time, and scalable synthesis highlights its strong potential for practical application in palm oil plant wastewater remediation and broader environmental engineering processes.

Author Contributions

J.P.-V., Y.B.-R. and J.A.R.-G. conceived and planned the experiments. J.P.-V. performed the experiments, with support from Y.C.-H. J.P.-V., Y.B.-R., J.A.R.-G. and Y.C.-H. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the results. J.P.-V., Y.B.-R., J.A.R.-G. and Y.C.-H. led the writing of the manuscript. All authors provided critical revisions and contributed substantially to the research, analysis, and final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Posgrado (VRIP) de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM)—R.R. N° 010238-2024-R/UNMSM and Project number B24130141i-PCONFIGI-INV 2024. The APC was funded by VRIP-UNMSM.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Edson Passamani Caetano from UFES and Renzo Rueda-Vellasmin from NANOTECH for the technical assistance in performing the X-ray diffraction measurements presented here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in performing and publishing this work.

References

  1. Informes de Expertos. Visión General del Mercado de Aceite de Palma. 2016. Available online: https://www.informesdeexpertos.com/informes/mercado-de-aceite-de-palma/toc (accessed on 18 February 2026).
  2. Adetunji, A.I.; Olaniran, A.O. Treatment of industrial oily wastewater by advanced technologies: A review. Appl. Water Sci. 2021, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Awere, E.; Appiah Obeng, P.; Bonoli, A. Water consumption and wastewater generation from small-scale crude palm oil extraction in Ghana. Water Pract. Technol. 2023, 18, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Digal, L.; Priyadarshini, P.; Kar, D.K.; Mohanty, J. Removal of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) from the Wastewater using Plant Based Nanobiomass. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2025, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ministerio De Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. RN° 0631-Parámetros Fisicoquímicos y Sus Valores Límites Máximos Permisibles en los Vertimientos Puntuales de Aguas Residuales no Domésticas—ARnD a Cuerpos de Aguas Superficiales; Ministerio De Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible: Bogotá, Colombia, 2015.
  6. Bassyouni, M.; Zoromba MSh Abdel-Aziz, M.H.; Mosly, I. Extraction of Nanocellulose for Eco-Friendly Biocomposite Adsorbent for Wastewater Treatment. Polymers 2022, 14, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Metcalf, E.; Eddy, E. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed.; McGraw Hill Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  8. Som, A.M.; Ramlee, A.A.; Puasa, S.W.; Hamid, H.A.A. Optimisation of operating conditions during coagulation-flocculation process in industrial wastewater treatment using Hylocereus undatus foliage through response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 30, 17108–17121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rajabi, S.; Ahmadian, F.; Maleky, S.; Hashemi, H. Chemical coagulation/flocculation process in organic load reduction of machining oily effluent (Z1): RSM-CCD optimization. Appl. Water Sci. 2025, 15, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Javeed, T.; Nawaz, R.; Al-Hussain, S.A.; Irfan, A.; Irshad, M.A.; Ahmad, S.; Zaki, M.E.A. Application of Advanced Oxidation Processes for the Treatment of Color and Chemical Oxygen Demand of Pulp and Paper Wastewater. Water 2023, 15, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Naguib, A.M.; Abdel-Gawad, S.A.; Mahmoud, A.S. Reduction of organic contaminants from industrial effluent using the advanced oxidation process, chemical coagulation, and green nanotechnology. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhan, X.; Chen, F. A multifunctional gelatin-based aerogel with superior pollutants adsorption, oil/water separation and photocatalytic properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 358, 1539–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dawood, E.; Mohammed, T.J.; Al-Timimi, B.A.; H Khader, E. Photocatalytic Degradation of Petroleum Wastewater Using ZnO-Loaded Pistachio Shell Biochar: A Sustainable Approach for Oil and COD Removal. Reactions 2025, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Munien, C.; Kweinor Tetteh, E.; Govender, T.; Jairajh, S.; Mguni, L.L.; Rathilal, S. Turbidity and COD Removal from Municipal Wastewater Using a TiO2 Photocatalyst—A Comparative Study of UV and Visible Light. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Awad, A.M.; Shaikh, S.M.R.; Jalab, R.; Gulied, M.H.; Nasser, M.S.; Benamor, A.; Adham, S. Adsorption of organic pollutants by natural and modified clays: A comprehensive review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 228, 115719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohaiyiddin, M.S.; Lin, O.H.; Owi, W.T.; Chan, C.H.; Chia, C.H.; Zakaria, S.; Villagracia, A.R.; Akil, H.M. Characterization of nanocellulose recovery from Elaeis guineensis frond for sustainable development. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2016, 18, 2503–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Muryanto Triwahyuni, E.; Abimayu, H.; Cahyono, A.; Cahyono, E.T.; Sudiyani, Y. Alkaline Delignification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Using Black Liquor from Pretreatment. Procedia Chem. 2015, 16, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marinho, E. Cellulose: A comprehensive review of its properties and applications. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2025, 11, 100283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vartiainen, J.; Pöhler, T.; Sirola, K.; Pylkkänen, L.; Alenius, H.; Hokkinen, J.; Tapper, U.; Lahtinen, P.; Kapanen, A.; Putkisto, K.; et al. Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 2011, 18, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. French, A.D. Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 2014, 21, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, C.M.; Mittal, A.; Barnette, A.L.; Kafle, K.; Park, Y.B.; Shin, H.; Johnson, D.K.; Park, S.; Kim, S.H. Cellulose polymorphism study with sum-frequency-generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy: Identification of exocyclic CH2OH conformation and chain orientation. Cellulose 2013, 20, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Li, S.; Wu, T.; Wang, X.; Cheng, X.; Li, D. A Comparative Study on the Characterization of Nanofibers with Cellulose I, I/II, and II Polymorphs from Wood. Polymers 2019, 11, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hubbe, M.A.; Rojas, O.J.; Lucia, L.A.; Sain, M. Cellulosic Nanocomposites: A Review. Bioresources 2008, 3, 929–980. [Google Scholar]
  24. Oh, S.Y.; Yoo, D.I.; Shin, Y.; Seo, G. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brodeur, G.; Yau, E.; Badal, K.; Collier, J.; Ramachandran, K.B.; Ramakrishnan, S. Chemical and Physicochemical Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review. Enzym. Res. 2011, 2011, 787532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheng, Y.-S.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, C.W.; Dooley, T.M.; Jenkins, B.M.; VanderGheynst, J.S. Evaluation of High Solids Alkaline Pretreatment of Rice Straw. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 1768–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Haque, M.d.A.; Barman, D.N.; Kang, T.H.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Yun, H.D. Effect of dilute alkali pretreatment on structural features and enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of Miscanthus sinensis at boiling temperature with low residence time. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 114, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vancov, T.; McIntosh, S. Alkali Pretreatment of Cereal Crop Residues for Second-Generation Biofuels. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 2754–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferro, M.; Mannu, A.; Panzeri, W.; Theeuwen, C.H.J.; Mele, A. An Integrated Approach to Optimizing Cellulose Mercerization. Polymers 2020, 12, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gong, J.; Li, J.; Xu, J.; Xiang, Z.; Mo, L. Research on cellulose nanocrystals produced from cellulose sources with various polymorphs. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 33486–33493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Potenza, M.; Bergamonti, L.; Lottici, P.P.; Righi, L.; Lazzarini, L.; Graiff, C. Green Extraction of Cellulose Nanocrystals of Polymorph II from Cynara scolymus L.: Challenge for a “Zero Waste” Economy. Crystals 2022, 12, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wulandari, W.T.; Rochliadi, A.; Arcana, I.M. Nanocellulose prepared by acid hydrolysis of isolated cellulose from sugarcane bagasse. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 107, 012045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kusmono Listyanda, R.F.; Wildan, M.W.; Ilman, M.N. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystal extracted from ramie fibers by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brinchi, L.; Cotana, F.; Fortunati, E.; Kenny, J.M. Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Septevani, A.A.; Rifathin, A.; Sari, A.A.; Sampora, Y.; Ariani, G.N.; Sudiyarmanto; Sondari, D. Oil palm empty fruit bunch-based nanocellulose as a super-adsorbent for water remediation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dash, B.; Mohanty, J. Effect of chemical pre-treatment on bioethanol production from defoliated dried neem (Azadirachta indica) leaves. Mater. Today Proc. 2024, 102, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. NTP 214.005:1987 (revisada el 2016); Agua Potable. Toma de Muestra. Instituto Nacional de Calidad (INACAL): Lima, Peru, 2016.
  38. NTP-ISO 5667-10:2012; Calidad de Agua. Muestreo. Parte 10: Guía Para el Muestreo de Aguas Residuales. Comisión de Normalización y de Fiscalización de Barreras Comerciales No Arancelarias (CNB-INDECOPI): Lima, Peru, 2012.
  39. Ichwan, M.; Onyianta, A.J.; Trask, R.S.; Etale, A.; Eichhorn, S.J. Production and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals of different allomorphs from oil palm empty fruit bunches for enhancing composite interlaminar fracture toughness. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2023, 5, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. Study of Micro-Structural Effects by Powder Diffraction Using the Program FULLPROF; Laboratoire Léon Brillouin (CEA-CNRS), CEA/Saclay: Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 2003; p. 91191. [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson, P.; Cox, D.E.; Hastings, J.B. Rietveld refinement of Debye–Scherrer synchrotron X-ray data from Al2O3. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Langan, P.; Nishiyama, Y.; Chanzy, H. X-ray Structure of Mercerized Cellulose II at 1 Å Resolution. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nishiyama, Y.; Langan, P.; Chanzy, H. Crystal Structure and Hydrogen-Bonding System in Cellulose Iβ from Synchrotron X-ray and Neutron Fiber Diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9074–9082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Balzar, D.; Audebrand, N.; Daymond, M.R.; Fitch, A.; Hewat, A.; Langford, J.I.; Le Bail, A.; Louër, D.; Masson, O.; McCowan, C.N.; et al. Size–strain line-broadening analysis of the ceria round-robin sample. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2004, 37, 911–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chiriac, A.I.; Pastor, F.I.J.; Popa, V.I.; Aflori, M.; Ciolacu, D. Changes of supramolecular cellulose structure and accessibility induced by the processive endoglucanase Cel9B from Paenibacillus barcinonensis. Cellulose 2014, 21, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Montgomery, D.C. Diseño y Análisis de Experimentos, 2nd ed.; Limusa Wiley: Mexico City, Mexico, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  47. American Public Health Association (APHA); American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 24th ed.; Method 5220 D: Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Closed Reflux, Colorimetric Method; APHA, AWWA, WEF: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hindi, S.S. Novel Recycling, Defibrillation, and Delignification Methods for Isolating α-Cellulose from Different Lignocellulosic Precursors for the Eco-Friendly Fiber Industry. Polymers 2024, 16, 2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ajayi, S.M.; Olusanya, S.O.; Sodeinde, K.O.; Didunyemi, A.E.; Atunde, M.O.; Fapojuwo, D.P.; Olumayede, E.G.; Lawal, O.S. Hydrophobic modification of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch: Characterization and application in Pickering emulsions stabilization. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2023, 5, 100282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Makarov, I.; Palchikova, E.; Vinogradov, M.; Golubev, Y.; Legkov, S.; Gromovykh, P.; Makarov, G.; Arkharova, N.; Karimov, D.; Gainutdinov, R. Characterization of Structure and Morphology of Cellulose Lyocell Microfibers Extracted from PAN Matrix. Polysaccharides 2025, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adsul, M.; Soni, S.K.; Bhargava, S.K.; Bansal, V. Facile Approach for the Dispersion of Regenerated Cellulose in Aqueous System in the Form of Nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2890–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Uppal, N.; Pappu, A.; Gowri, V.K.S.; Thakur, V.K. Cellulosic fibres-based epoxy composites: From bioresources to a circular economy. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 182, 114895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ruckenstein, E.; Guo, W. Crosslinked mercerized cellulose membranes and their application to membrane affinity chromatography. J. Memb. Sci. 2001, 187, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ling, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Xu, F. Exploring crystalline-structural variations of cellulose during alkaline pretreatment for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yue, Y.; Han, J.; Han, G.; Zhang, Q.; French, A.D.; Wu, Q. Characterization of cellulose I/II hybrid fibers isolated from energycane bagasse during the delignification process: Morphology, crystallinity and percentage estimation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 133, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abidi, N.; Cabrales, L.; Haigler, C.H. Changes in the cell wall and cellulose content of developing cotton fibers investigated by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 100, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. García-García, D.; Balart, R.; Lopez-Martinez, J.; Ek, M.; Moriana, R. Optimizing the yield and physico-chemical properties of pine cone cellulose nanocrystals by different hydrolysis time. Cellulose 2018, 25, 2925–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chieng, B.; Lee, S.; Ibrahim, N.; Then, Y.; Loo, Y. Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystals from Oil Palm Mesocarp Fiber. Polymers 2017, 9, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Md Salim, R.; Asik, J.; Sarjadi, M.S. Chemical functional groups of extractives, cellulose and lignin extracted from native Leucaena leucocephala bark. Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ferreira, R.; Garcia, H.; Sousa, A.F.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Pereira, C.S. Isolation of suberin from birch outer bark and cork using ionic liquids: A new source of macromonomers. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 44, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lani, N.S.; Ngadi, N.; Johari, A.; Jusoh, M. Isolation, Characterization, and Application of Nanocellulose from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber as Nanocomposites. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 1702538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Q.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.; Xu, F. High Purity and Low Molecular Weight Lignin Nano-Particles Extracted from Acid-Assisted MIBK Pretreatment. Polymers 2020, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tian, W.; Li, H.; Zhou, J.; Guo, Y. Preparation, characterization and the adsorption characteristics of lignin/silica nanocomposites from cellulosic ethanol residue. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41176–41181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Le Troedec, M.; Sedan, D.; Peyratout, C.; Bonnet, J.P.; Smith, A.; Guinebretiere, R.; Gloaguen, V.; Krausz, P. Influence of various chemical treatments on the composition and structure of hemp fibres. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2008, 39, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El Oudiani, A.; Chaabouni, Y.; Msahli, S.; Sakli, F. Crystal transition from cellulose I to cellulose II in NaOH treated Agave americana L. fibre. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1221–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Montoya-Escobar, N.; Ospina-Acero, D.; Velásquez-Cock, J.A.; Gómez-Hoyos, C.; Serpa Guerra, A.; Gañan Rojo, P.F.; Acosta, L.M.V.; Escobar, J.P.; Correa-Hincapié, N.; Triana-Chávez, O.; et al. Use of Fourier Series in X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis and Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) for Estimation of Crystallinity in Cellulose from Different Sources. Polymers 2022, 14, 5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Idrees, M.; Adnan, A.; Qureshi, F.A. Optimization of Sulfide/Sulfite Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Lactic Acid Production. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 934171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mantovan, J.; Giraldo, G.A.G.; Marim, B.M.; Garcia, P.S.; Baron, A.M.; Mali, S. Cellulose-based materials from orange bagasse employing environmentally friendly approaches. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, Y.; Sun, B.; Zheng, X.; Yu, L.; Li, J. Integrated microwave and alkaline treatment for the separation between hemicelluloses and cellulose from cellulosic fibers. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rana, M.d.S.; Rahim, M.d.A.; Mosharraf, M.d.P.; Tipu, M.d.F.K.; Chowdhury, J.A.; Haque, M.R.; Kabir, S.; Amran, S.; Chowdhury, A.A. Morphological, Spectroscopic and Thermal Analysis of Cellulose Nanocrystals Extracted from Waste Jute Fiber by Acid Hydrolysis. Polymers 2023, 15, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mahmud, M.M.; Perveen, A.; Jahan, R.A.; Matin, M.A.; Wong, S.Y.; Li, X.; Arafat, M.T. Preparation of different polymorphs of cellulose from different acid hydrolysis medium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kasyapi, N.; Chaudhary, V.; Bhowmick, A.K. Bionanowhiskers from jute: Preparation and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1116–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Leong, S.L.; Tiong, S.I.X.; Siva, S.P.; Ahamed, F.; Chan, C.-H.; Lee, C.L.; Chew, I.M.L.; Ho, Y.K. Morphological control of cellulose nanocrystals via sulfuric acid hydrolysis based on sustainability considerations: An overview of the governing factors and potential challenges. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jin, E.; Guo, J.; Yang, F.; Zhu, Y.; Song, J.; Jin, Y.; Rojas, O.J. On the polymorphic and morphological changes of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC-I) upon mercerization and conversion to CNC-II. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 143, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zlenko, D.V.; Vtyurina, D.N.; Usachev, S.V.; Skoblin, A.A.; Mikhaleva, M.G.; Politenkova, G.G.; Nikolsky, S.N.; Stovbun, S.V. On the orientation of the chains in the mercerized cellulose. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Buenaño, L.; Ali, E.; Jafer, A.; Zaki, S.H.; Hammady, F.J.; Khayoun Alsaadi, S.B.; Karim, M.M.; Ramadan, M.F.; Omran, A.A.; Alawadi, A.; et al. Optimization by Box–Behnken design for environmental contaminants removal using magnetic nanocomposite. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ahmad, A.; Lajis, M.A.; Yusuf, N.K.; Ab Rahim, S.N. Statistical Optimization by the Response Surface Methodology of Direct Recycled Aluminum-Alumina Metal Matrix Composite (MMC-AlR) Employing the Metal Forming Process. Processes 2020, 8, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schmidt, A.F.; Finan, C. Linear regression and the normality assumption. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2018, 98, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Piñeiro, G.; Perelman, S.; Guerschman, J.P.; Paruelo, J.M. How to evaluate models: Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecol. Model. 2008, 216, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Solhi, L.; Guccini, V.; Heise, K.; Solala, I.; Niinivaara, E.; Xu, W.; Mihhels, K.; Kröger, M.; Meng, Z.; Wohlert, J.; et al. Understanding Nanocellulose–Water Interactions: Turning a Detriment into an Asset. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 1925–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nagendran, V.; Goveas, L.C.; Vinayagam, R.; Varadavenkatesan, T.; Selvaraj, R. Challenges and advances in nanocellulose-based adsorbents for dye removal: Mechanisms and future directions. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2024, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Huaman Meza, B.L.; Peña Pineda, K.J. Aerogel Compuesto de Nanofibrillas de Celulosa y Micropartículas de Quitosano Para el Tratamiento de Aguas Mieles de Café. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Césa Vallejo, Lima, Perú, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y. Electrospun Cellulose Acetate/Chitosan Fibers for Humic Acid Removal: Construction Guided by Intermolecular Interaction Study. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 5022–5029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Villabona-Ortíz, Á.; Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Ortega-Toro, R. Kinetics and Adsorption Equilibrium in the Removal of Azo-Anionic Dyes by Modified Cellulose. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lambertz, S.; Franke, M.; Stelter, M.; Braeutigam, P. Sensing of chemical oxygen demand (COD) by amperometric detection—Dependence of current signal on concentration and type of organic species. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Abdelaziz, R.M.; El-Maghraby, A.; Sadik, W.A.-A.; El-Demerdash, A.-G.M.; Fadl, E.A. Biodegradable cellulose nanocrystals hydrogels for removal of acid red 8 dye from aqueous solutions. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Klučáková, M. New possibility for characterization of dissociation behaviour of supramolecular electrolytes: Results obtained for the International Humic Substances Society standard and reference samples by coulometry. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Vysotsky, Y.B.; Kartashynska, E.S.; Vollhardt, D.; Fainerman, V.B. Surface p K a of Saturated Carboxylic Acids at the Air/Water Interface: A Quantum Chemical Approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 13809–13818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ismail, M.; Dhiss, T.; Ben Marzoug, K.; Ben Amor, H.; Koheil, H.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Keshta, B.E. Reduction of COD level in real textile effluent using natural Tunisian clay as a low-cost adsorbent. Results Chem. 2025, 18, 102734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, T.; Yu, Z.; Yang, T.; Xu, G.; Guan, Y.; Guo, C. Modified Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for COD removal in oil field produced water and regeneration. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Heydari Orojlou, S.; Rastegarzadeh, S.; Zargar, B. Experimental and modeling analyses of COD removal from industrial wastewater using the TiO2–chitosan nanocomposites. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Atiyah, Z.Y.; Muallah, S.K.; Abbar, A.H. Removal of COD from petroleum refinery wastewater by adsorption using activated carbon derived from avocado plant. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 48, 467–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kiani, R.; Mirzaei, F.; Ghanbari, F.; Feizi, R.; Mehdipour, F. Real textile wastewater treatment by a sulfate radicals-Advanced Oxidation Process: Peroxydisulfate decomposition using copper oxide (CuO) supported onto activated carbon. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Waskito, P.; Zakir, M.; Taba, P. Chemical oxygen demand removal by modified carbon with H2SO4 from oil palm fruit bunches. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2024, 104, 9616–9631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ibrahim, M.A.; Salama, A.; Zahran, F.; Abdelfattah, M.S.; Alsalme, A.; Bechelany, M.; Barhoum, A. Fabrication of cellulose nanocrystals/carboxymethyl cellulose/zeolite membranes for methylene blue dye removal: Understanding factors, adsorption kinetics, and thermodynamic isotherms. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1330810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) ATR-FTIR spectra of SCP, SCB, SCS, SC, CNCs-1, and CNCs-2; (b) spectrum derived from (a) in the range of 3700 to 2800 cm−1 (Region I); (c) spectrum derived from (a) in the range of 1800 to 1400 cm−1 (Region II); (d) and spectrum derived from (a) in the range of 1400 to 700 cm−1 (Region III).
Figure 1. (a) ATR-FTIR spectra of SCP, SCB, SCS, SC, CNCs-1, and CNCs-2; (b) spectrum derived from (a) in the range of 3700 to 2800 cm−1 (Region I); (c) spectrum derived from (a) in the range of 1800 to 1400 cm−1 (Region II); (d) and spectrum derived from (a) in the range of 1400 to 700 cm−1 (Region III).
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g001
Figure 2. Chemical representation of intermolecular and intramolecular bonds in cellulose polymorphs (left) and II (right).
Figure 2. Chemical representation of intermolecular and intramolecular bonds in cellulose polymorphs (left) and II (right).
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction profiles during the treatment sequence: (a) all diffractograms, (b) SCP, (c) SCB, (d) SCS, (e) SC, (f) CNCs-1, (g) CNCs-2.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction profiles during the treatment sequence: (a) all diffractograms, (b) SCP, (c) SCB, (d) SCS, (e) SC, (f) CNCs-1, (g) CNCs-2.
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g003aNanomaterials 16 00374 g003b
Figure 4. The Rietveld-refined X-ray diffractograms of the SCS, SCB, CNCs-1, and CNCs-2 samples. Experimental data are shown as red symbols, whereas the fitted profiles are displayed as black lines. Peak positions are indicated by green vertical lines, and the blue solid lines represent the differences between the experimental and refined curves. The Y-axis represents the intensity.
Figure 4. The Rietveld-refined X-ray diffractograms of the SCS, SCB, CNCs-1, and CNCs-2 samples. Experimental data are shown as red symbols, whereas the fitted profiles are displayed as black lines. Peak positions are indicated by green vertical lines, and the blue solid lines represent the differences between the experimental and refined curves. The Y-axis represents the intensity.
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g004
Figure 5. Results of the COD removal process: (1) MTD-01, (2) MTD-02, (3) MTD-03, (4) MTD-04, (5) MTD-05, (6) MTD-06, (7) MTD-07, (8) MTD-08, (9) MTD-09, (10) MTD-10, (11) MTD-11, (12) MTD-12, (13) MTD-13, (14) MTD-14, and (15) MTD-15.
Figure 5. Results of the COD removal process: (1) MTD-01, (2) MTD-02, (3) MTD-03, (4) MTD-04, (5) MTD-05, (6) MTD-06, (7) MTD-07, (8) MTD-08, (9) MTD-09, (10) MTD-10, (11) MTD-11, (12) MTD-12, (13) MTD-13, (14) MTD-14, and (15) MTD-15.
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g005
Figure 6. (a) Predicted vs. experimental results of removal efficiency in binary system, (b) normal probability plot of residuals, and (c) residuals vs. predicted; black line indicates the zero-residual reference, and red lines represent the critical limits for externally studentized residuals.
Figure 6. (a) Predicted vs. experimental results of removal efficiency in binary system, (b) normal probability plot of residuals, and (c) residuals vs. predicted; black line indicates the zero-residual reference, and red lines represent the critical limits for externally studentized residuals.
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g006
Figure 7. Three-dimensional response surface graphs and contour plots: (a) CNCs-2 mass vs. contact time; (b) CNCs-2 mass vs. pH; (c) contact time vs. pH; (df) corresponding contour plots. Colors represent COD removal: blue for low, green for intermediate, red for high.
Figure 7. Three-dimensional response surface graphs and contour plots: (a) CNCs-2 mass vs. contact time; (b) CNCs-2 mass vs. pH; (c) contact time vs. pH; (df) corresponding contour plots. Colors represent COD removal: blue for low, green for intermediate, red for high.
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g007
Figure 8. Schematic of possible electrostatic interaction on the surfaces of CNCs-2.
Figure 8. Schematic of possible electrostatic interaction on the surfaces of CNCs-2.
Nanomaterials 16 00374 g008
Table 1. Experimental matrix for BBD.
Table 1. Experimental matrix for BBD.
VariablesSymbolUnitRange and Level
−10+1
CNCs-2 massAg 0.030.091.5
Contact timeBmin205080
pH of the treatmentC-357
Table 2. Calculated DOC values.
Table 2. Calculated DOC values.
SampleDOC (%)
SCP77.7
SCB57.3
SCS59.5
SC91.9
CNCs-174.4
CNCs-272.7
Table 3. Rietveld-refined parameters: lattices and volume cells, Caglioti parameters, and goodness of fit, with chi-square (χ2). Rp (%) is the profile refinement, Rwp (%) is the weighted profile residual, and Rexp (%) is the expected R-factor.
Table 3. Rietveld-refined parameters: lattices and volume cells, Caglioti parameters, and goodness of fit, with chi-square (χ2). Rp (%) is the profile refinement, Rwp (%) is the weighted profile residual, and Rexp (%) is the expected R-factor.
Refinement ParameterSCBSCSCNCs-1CNCs-2
a   ( ) 8.216 (1)8.107 (2)7.926 (2)7.945 (2)
b   ( ) 6.084 (1)6.314 (4)9.025 (1)9.042 (1)
c   ( ) 9.916 (2)10.447 (9)7.409 (3)7.399 (3)
α   ( ° ) 90.00 (0)90.00 (0)90.00 (0)90.00 (0)
β   ( ° ) 90.00 (0)90.00 (0)90.00 (0)90.00 (0)
γ   ( ° ) 105.47 (2)99.58 (4)117.32 (1)117.43 (1)
V   ( 3 ) 477.68 (1)527.25 (6)470.82 (2)471.82 (2)
FWHM parameters
U1.8983.3210.17660.2087
V−0.7533−0.2606−0.6239−0.6021
W 2.7032.6610.95840.9169
Microstructural parameters
Mean maximum strain79.38 (2)98.42 (1)36.96 (3)72.69 (7)
Mean crystallite size (nm)5.03 (5)3.73 (7)4.99 (2)5.43 (2)
Statistical goodness-of-fit (GoF) parameters
R p   ( % ) 6.428.935.275.36
R w p   ( % ) 6.268.655.665.72
R e x p   ( % ) 5.376.554.364.50
χ21.361.741.681.62
Table 4. BBD matrix.
Table 4. BBD matrix.
TreatmentCNCs-2 Mass (g)pHContact Time (min)COD Removal
IIIAverage (mg L−1)%SD (±) *
MTD-010.15750369.9357.2351.5585.2212.7
MTD-020.09780345.5359.7376.6085.6614.2
MTD-030.09550326.4328.7327.5586.682.3
MTD-040.15520271.1284.2277.6588.7113.1
MTD-050.03580326.4317.6322.0086.918.8
MTD-060.15580353.7342.9348.3085.8410.8
MTD-070.09380263.7253.4258.5589.4910.3
MTD-080.09550317.1318.3317.7586.151.3
MTD-090.03350235.6259.6247.689.9324.0
MTD-100.03520256.5258.1257.3089.541.6
MTD-110.09320214.0205.7209.8591.478.3
MTD-120.15350220.7223.6222.1590.972.9
MTD-130.09550312.0319.3315.6587.167.3
MTD-140.03750311.0299.1305.0587.5911.9
MTD-150.09720332.1321.3326.7086.7110.8
* Standard deviation.
Table 5. ANOVA for COD removal.
Table 5. ANOVA for COD removal.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model61.6468.8129.730.0001
A1.3011.304.400.0741
B9.1019.1030.710.0009
C34.78134.78117.42<0.0001
AC2.9112.919.810.0165
A23.5313.5311.910.0107
B22.8812.889.710.0169
C28.9918.9930.340.0009
Residual2.0770.2962
Lack of Fit1.0750.21300.42260.8108
Pure Error1.0120.5041
Cor Total63.7114
R20.9675 Std. Dev. 0.5442
Adjusted R20.9349 Mean87.71
Predicted R20.8908 C.V.%0.6205
Adeq precision16.0964
Table 6. Comparison of COD removal efficiency with various adsorbents.
Table 6. Comparison of COD removal efficiency with various adsorbents.
Adsorbent C 0 , C O D (mg L−1) Dose (g L−1)pHContact Time (min)Treated Water% RemovalReference
Natural clay1145.00.5 7.4180Textile effluent 66[89]
Fe3O4-IDA-Cu2+ nanoparticles- 1460 Oilfield-produced water66.7[90]
TiO2 nanoparticles with chitosan-257.4180Petrochemical effluent94.5[91]
Activated carbon from avocado seeds550.053-Petroleum refinery wastewater94.54[92]
CuO–activated carbon composite-1 760Textile wastewater72[93]
Activated carbon88.420290Synthetic wastewater63.35[94]
Modified carbon75.41
Nanocellulose (NCS05)1304.4-7-River water67.89[35]
Nanocellulose acetate (NCA)352.03 240Synthetic wastewater86[4]
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs-2)2459.00.5320Palm oil plant wastewater91.47(This study)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pomalaya-Velasco, J.; Bendezú-Roca, Y.; Canchanya-Huaman, Y.; Ramos-Guivar, J.A. Polymorph II Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for High-Efficiency COD Removal in Industrial Wastewater. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060374

AMA Style

Pomalaya-Velasco J, Bendezú-Roca Y, Canchanya-Huaman Y, Ramos-Guivar JA. Polymorph II Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for High-Efficiency COD Removal in Industrial Wastewater. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(6):374. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pomalaya-Velasco, Jemina, Yéssica Bendezú-Roca, Yamerson Canchanya-Huaman, and Juan A. Ramos-Guivar. 2026. "Polymorph II Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for High-Efficiency COD Removal in Industrial Wastewater" Nanomaterials 16, no. 6: 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060374

APA Style

Pomalaya-Velasco, J., Bendezú-Roca, Y., Canchanya-Huaman, Y., & Ramos-Guivar, J. A. (2026). Polymorph II Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for High-Efficiency COD Removal in Industrial Wastewater. Nanomaterials, 16(6), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop